web
counter
 

The Lion King 3-D Review: The Circle of Life for a Few Dollars More

By Agent Bedhead | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (23)



lionking1.jpg

Ordinarily, I’d be rolling my eyes in sheer dismissal at the fact that Walt Disney has re-released one of its most beloved films [to be more precise, its 32nd animated feature film that also hails from the studio’s so-called “Renaissance” period and just happens to be the top-grossing ($783 million globally) hand-drawn animated film of all time] while jacking up the price with a 3-D premium. Yet I’m not nearly as apathetic about this re-release as I presumed, due to my erroneous presumption that the 3-D couldn’t possibly make much of a difference. Unfortunately, all of the digital trickery involved is not a subtle endeavor and, as such, takes away from most of the previously-existing breathtaking moments of what was once a sprawling epic. Here, the 3-D does not enhance the movie in question but makes the visuals substantially less appealing, which in turn lessens the mythic stature of the story itself.

Such a damn shame.

That’s the main reason for reviewing The Lion King 3D, right? To tell you what effect the 3-D makes upon the 1994 classic. Well, it makes a great difference in that it looks like crap now. The technique used is not a delicate enhancement, the animation now seems layered, and the extra dimension is much more of a distraction than anything else. The sweeping views of African plains are now rendered into a dimly-lit farce, and the careful focus shiftings of the original are now mere gimmicks. Obviously, this is also post-production 3-D that we’re dealing with here too, so if you want to relive the frustrating, what-the-hell-am-I-looking-at feeling of the Clash of the Titans remake, well, be my guest. Instead of reflecting a painstakingly applied gradation, The Lion King 3D is the cinematic version of a pop-up book. That is, the visuals are now flimsy and easy to pull apart even for the least discriminating viewer.

The story, however, remains the same as do the themes. The circle of life, death, loss, guilt, fear, destiny, and responsibility are all still present in an original story that still heavily borrows from preexisting tales and, mostly notably, evokes shades of Hamlet and Bambi as well as gratuitously bathes in Biblical overtones. Also still intact is the remarkable voice cast that includes James Earl Jones, Jeremy Irons, Rowan Atkinson (as the hovering tutor-bird, Zazu), and Nathan Lane.

And so we re-witness the birth of lion cub Prince Simba (voiced early on by Jonathan Taylor Thomas and later by Matthew Broderick), who is born to proud parents King Mufasa (James Earl Jones) and Queen Sarabi (Madge Sinclair). Simba is welcomed with much joy to the Pride Lands by everyone except for one soul. The King’s brother, Scar (Jeremy Irons), wants the throne for himself, so he tries and fails to kill young Simba; some years later, Scar eventually executes a plan to kill Mufasa and make Simba believe that he was responsible for his father’s death. Scar then assumes the throne and Simba heads into exile. Long story short, he meets Timon (Nathan Lane) and Pumbaa (Ernie Sabella), sings “Hakuna Matata,” and is eventually persuaded by his childhood friend, Nala (Moira Kelly), to return and defeat Scar and the three hyenas (Whoopi Goldberg, Jim Cummings, and Cheech Marin). Yes, I’m oversimplifying the plot a great deal but also expect that most of you know the drill.

In the end, it seems pointless to re-release this movie in 3-D, but it’s also a nice way to welcome back some quality into theaters that even Disney itself can’t hope to reach these days. So it’s great that the story is back out there, and it’s nice to have the opportunity to see The Lion King on the big screen when most of us have only seen it on VHS or DVD; but the 3-D lessens the original experience. Yes, the landscapes, the stampede, and Atkinson’s flight-bound Zuzu pop out when you put on those funny glasses, but the unavoidable muting of the colors outweighs all of the 3-D novelty. Further, those potentially scary sequences will truly freak out the young ones in 3-D. As always, the movie does contain a significant amount of intense violence (Mufasa’s death by trampling stampede and the climactic battle) and very wrenching moments involving the loss of a parent. No matter what feelings that The Lion King 3D manages to stir up, however, it’s all about the extra bucks. By the way, the Blu-ray “Diamond Edition” of the movie hits stores in two weeks, so this movie’s re-release in 3-D is no mere coincidence.

Agent Bedhead lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She and her little black heart can be found at Celebitchy.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Drive Review: I'm Going Where the Road Won't Dare | Disappearing TV Characters, Actors Turned Musicians, Musicians Turned Actors, and the Sexy Psychopaths that Murder Them









Comments

Ah, well. Like you said, it might be nice to see it on the big screen if you haven't before. But lucky me, this was the first movie I watched repeatedl in theaters, back when I was 11. I think I made 5 different family members take me to the theater to see it. So I'm not missing much.

But it is pretty damn sad that this will be the way people watch it. It's just so damn useless. I imagine they could've made just as much money (and without inflating prices for 3D) just by re-releasing it in theaters in 2D.

Posted by: Figgy at September 17, 2011 1:34 PM

I sincerely hope that no one goes to see this.

Posted by: TheOtherGreg at September 17, 2011 1:43 PM

We are taking my baby brother to see it tonight he is 6. We are 31,26,24,18 and the baby is 6. I shouldn't have read this because we are kind of excited because we only saw it on VHS.

Posted by: Blacksred at September 17, 2011 2:17 PM

I agree with you, Figgy. I would have loved to take my oldest daughter to see the original version in the theatre but not in 3D. I remember exactly where I saw it the first time. I bawled like a baby in the opening scene with that amazing choir singing "The Circle of Life" combined with the visual and emotional elements. Probably the most beautiful animated sequences in film history, in my opinion.

Posted by: prairiegirl at September 17, 2011 2:29 PM

I prefer the Little Mermaid, thank you very much.

Posted by: jjrox at September 17, 2011 2:51 PM

I just took my 11 year old daughter and her friend to see the 3D version last night. I took my now grown sons to see the original at the theaters when it came out back in 94 or whenever that was. Like you, I thought the original was better, the colors were more realistic of a dusty African savanna than the pastel overlay of 3D birds and flowers. I have nothing against 3D when it enhances, as it did in How to Train a Dragon. That was incredible use of 3D, but of course that was designed from the ground up as a 3D movie.

For what it's worth, my daughter and her friend really enjoyed the 3D version of The Lion King, so it's worth it for the kids.

Posted by: MP McDonald at September 17, 2011 3:11 PM

Sometimes "improving" a film makes it worse.

George Lucas, you're on my List.

Posted by: The Wanderer at September 17, 2011 4:26 PM

There are a few showings in 2D, depending on your area. I can put up with the transparent cash grab if it lets me see this movie again in its original form in theaters.

Posted by: Artemis at September 17, 2011 4:31 PM

We are taking my baby brother to see it tonight he is 6. We are 31,26,24,18 and the baby is 6. I shouldn't have read this because we are kind of excited because we only saw it on VHS.

Posted by: Blacksred at September 17, 2011 2:17 PM

VHS, the fuck! Who the fuck are you guys, the Waltons?

Posted by: Pookie at September 17, 2011 6:09 PM

I remember seeing this in the theater. My dad had told me I was probably going to cry (I think he secretly cried when he saw a preview screening) and yep, I sure did. The music to the stampede scene still gives me chills.

Posted by: Lauren at September 17, 2011 6:55 PM

Kahuna Miata: The Circle of Greed.

Posted by: The Mutt at September 17, 2011 7:50 PM

I was never a huge fan of The Lion King. But the SNES game rocked.

Posted by: Lucas at September 17, 2011 8:00 PM

Best Disney villain song? "Be Prepared" or "Hellfire"?

Posted by: Fredo at September 17, 2011 9:39 PM

VHS, the fuck! Who the fuck are you guys, the Waltons?

Posted by: Pookie at September 17, 2011 6:09 PM

If I was drinking milk, it would of come out my nose and be all over the screen. :-D

I must confess, I also own the VHS of "The Lion King" and "The Black Cauldron" (extra geek points)

Posted by: vhrico at September 18, 2011 12:02 AM

I'd like to think of 3-D technology used in movies by studios to be like the tailor-con artists Emperor's New Clothes; they make the movie extra dark and fuzzy, give you goofy glasses, and charge you extra money so that you can "see" everything in "glorious" Three Dimensions! "Oh, isn't that marvelous? Wow it looks soooo real, doesn't it? You see the awesomeness, right? No? Well only a fool couldn't see the vast improvement our retroactive treatment gives this movie. You're not a fool, are you?" Well actually, that's what the studios are counting on.

And of course, hoodwinked parents out there will then claim that they too see the non-existent brilliance in the attempt to give 3-D where none was before. They will then take their squealing whelps to this presentation by the Duggarload and shell out the unnecessary extra pence to give their family eyestrain for the next 90 minutes. It will be then and only then when one of the brats in question will finally declare, "But I can't see anything at all!" will it dawn upon these meatheads of the rather obvious truth. This technology should once again be banished to the bowels of cinematic Hell for another 25 years until someone can utilize some actual light into the picture and find a purpose for using it besides screwing up movies shot in 2-D.

Posted by: bleujayone at September 18, 2011 12:32 AM

Posted by: Q at September 18, 2011 3:59 AM

Diamond edition?

Posted by: csb at September 18, 2011 5:04 AM

Best Disney villain song? "Be Prepared" or "Hellfire"?

Posted by: Fredo at September 17, 2011 9:39 PM

Tough call...but I'd go with Hellfire, because though Tony Jay might tie with Jeremy Irons in the "I was born a Bad Guy with this Voice" category, the chants from the Mass in the background elevate the song to the truly vicious.

(And I have to give props to 'Savages', simply because the imagery in the movie coupled with the two sides singing made it extra creepy.)

Posted by: nessun at September 18, 2011 2:35 PM

I'd have to go with "Be Prepared" if only for the malice that Jeremy Irons brings to the song. "We're gonna kill him. And Simba, too." But "Hellfire" is a pretty great song too and I think "Hunchback" is probably the most underrated of the new Disney classics. "Lion King" was dark but Hunchback was pitch black at times and really pushed the adult themes to the limit.

And the imagery is both haunting and beautiful. I remember seeing it in the theater and catching my breath at the panoramic shot of Notre Dame under siege as molten fire poured out of the windows. That is one intense movie.

Posted by: TylerDFC at September 18, 2011 7:15 PM

Fuck this. F-U-C-K. FUCK. THIS.

There, it had to be said.

Posted by: , at September 18, 2011 8:46 PM

3-D makes at least a little bit of sense when the source is 3-D, like live action or a Pixar-like film. However, no amount of post-production (short of entirely reanimating the movie) will ever make a 2-D hand drawn cartoon look 3-D because it just isn't. I'm sure it boosted the grosses a bit, but artistically, how does someone decided to do something like this? Live action movies already have a weird "leveling" effect in 3-D. Cartoons are just going to make that stand out even more.

Posted by: Socrates_Johnson at September 19, 2011 11:01 AM

I can't even fucking conceive of how fucking stupid it is to add 3D to a 2D animation. I mean, post-production 3D is a fucking joke anyway, but at least in live action films one has the consolation that the images on screen are recordings of actual three-dimensional objects, be they physical or virtual. But 3D-ifying a fucking CEL ANIMATION? It's like... it's like... no, I literally can't think of anything more inane.

Posted by: Robin at September 21, 2011 12:09 AM

I love it! Good read!

Posted by: Kente Cloth at September 21, 2011 9:23 PM