web
counter
 

The Devil's Double Review: Hussein in the Membrane, Hussein in the Brain

By Brian Prisco | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (18)



devilsdoublereview.jpeg

Bad guys are always so much cooler than good. Even Bruce Willis at his badasserousest had to face against the likes of Alan Rickman. In Paradise Lost, the most entertaining and interesting character is Lucifer. And such is the case with Lee Tamahori’s The Devil’s Double, a biopic based on the life of Latif Yahia, an Iraqi soldier forced to live as the double of Uday Hussein. The depiction of Uday Hussein as this demonic imp, this gaptoothed wild monkey who snorts coke from knifepoint, steals schoolgirls off the streets of Baghdad to rape them, and parties to the Rhino Records Razor and Tie “Greaties of the Latey Eighties” soundtrack, is nothing short of mesmerizing. The film becomes this unholy amalgam of The Parent Trap and Scarface. It truly is a mob movie, with the big baddy daddy Saddam loping about like a porn-stachioed Tony Soprano while his unruly son cavorts like a gleeful maniac in his palace. If it were nothing but a film about Uday Hussein’s antics, it would be a fucking revelation. As it stands, it gets mired down in the dreadful depiction of Latif Yahia as this stalwart noble warrior forced to stand witness to Uday and his machinations. Latif Yahia comes off like Lancelot on Miracle Whip, and every scene with his scowling and frowning seeks to do nothing more than belabor the shameful crap quality of Michael Thomas’s screenplay. Which you would think would have come from the Macbook of a freshly squat USC grad and not a veteran who penned Ladyhawke and The Hunger. Instead of a focusing on the monster and making a horror story, they focus on the dreary morality of Latif Yahia and hand in a script worthy of “Threat Level Midnight.” But what do you expect from Tamahori, known for directing xXx: State of the Union and Next? I just count myself blessed nobody skysurfed over a blazing oil fire.

As the film opens, during the first Bush era of White House Domination, Iraq is bullchinashopping the Middle East. First the Iran squabble, and now they are seeking to take back Kuwait. Saddam Hussein is in full power, dictatoring and like, and he’s set up his two sons in palaces where they live with reckless abandon. Latif Yahia, a schoolmate of Uday’s who somewhat resembled him, is pulled from military service and forced into the den of the young Turk, where he’s told he will play a double. The Hussein’s had long been using doubles for Saddam, as was depicted in the historical docudrama “Arrested Development.” His family properly threatened and the soldier properly Abu Gharibbed, Latif has no choice but to undergo facial reconstructive surgery in order to resemble the mustachioed lothario.

Dominic Cooper plays both Latif and Uday, and it’s a remarkable performance. I lauded Edward Norton for his doobious dual performance in last year’s Leaves of Grass, but it feels at times as if Cooper is actually two separate actors. Added to this is the added degree of difficulty, because while people know Edward Norton is a talented actor, rarely do we concern ourselves with Cooper. It’s not that he does a bad job in the normal day to day, it’s just that he’s never really done much to distinguish himself — at least to my knowledge. (Feel free to belabor this, Brits and Britophiles, for I know dear Dom has done much in the way of cinema.) I’ve always thought he looked and performed like a Bebe’s Kids sketch of Robert Pattinson. His Latif is brooding and his eyes carry such anger and heat, aside from his firmly set shoulders and constant annoyed scowl, you can always tell when you watching Latif and when you are watching Uday. Yet Cooper as Uday is the awe-inspiring performance. He’s a living firework, a live-action “Grand Theft Auto” character, strutting around with a gap-tooth grin, a cigar, and waving around a gold-plated AK-47. He’s cartoonish, ridiculous, charismatic, and a horrible horrible person. You are amused by his slimy capering, and then his violent turns. He really does recall Tony Montana, only smeared with hummus and a while not unibrow maybe communicollegebrow. He’s a clown prince of evil, and Cooper’s manic Uday is pretty much the only reason I would recommend watching this film.

Unfortunately, the film is less about being Uday Hussein, and more about the noble put-upon. Latif Yahia is a fucking Boy Scout, and it’s tiresome. Of course he doesn’t want to portray such a scumbag as Uday. Of course he will nobly put himself forward to protect innocents. Of course he’s just doing this to keep his family safe. This is bad enough. But Thomas feels the need to tack some sort of awful love story — rescuing the damsel in distress in Uday’s mistress Sarrab (Ludivine Sagnier). I love Sagnier, because she’s Bijou Phillips reliable in basically getting graphically naked in almost every film. I swear she has a rider in her contract that someone has to ride her in every film. But she’s so terrible in this film, she could’ve been replaced by a cardboard cutout. She has all the depth of a Robert Plant video vixen and she spends most of the movie wearing terrible wigs and awkwardly making sexy faces. It’s an embarrassing character, and an even worse performance. Sagnier is so sexual that even hearing the words “Swimming Pool” gives me a semi-erection (which is awkward between Memorial and Labor Days), but she’s like watching a Toddlers and Tiara subject suddenly 3 Going on 30-ed. The rest of the script isn’t much better, as it’s obviously geared not to examine Uday Hussein but to make Latif Yahia look like a grand and honorable honored hero forced to endure him. And thus, we’re forced to endure Latif.

The Devil’s Double breaks out weirdly graphic acts of sudden violence and nudity like it was edited by a STARZ exec. “We need more tits! Cut open that guy’s stomach and show intestines! C’mon, people, that gun’s not going to cock itself. This needs at least 15% more wang.” Unlike some of the other films I’ve seen as of late, Dominic Cooper’s Uday Hussein is literally worth the price of admission. Cooper gives a bravura performance in an otherwise dull and overlong film. There’s so much potential in writing about living the life of a scoundrel. And the Husseins are those rare characters that really can’t sue for defamation of character. When the world cheers your demise, literary licenses be damned. I’d rather watch the villain plot and scheme than deal with the dumb hero being all noble and shit. I believe it was Mother Teresa who once said, “We don’t need another hero. We don’t need to know the way home. All we want is life beyond the Thunderdome.” As astonishing as Latif Yahia’s sacrifice was, the more interesting character is the devil he doubles. Hopefully, enough people can overlook the weakness in the script to properly appreciate the hellcat two-part performance of Dominic Cooper. It’s a gold-plated career maker.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The Future Review | I Can't Decide Whether to Fall in Love or Yack Talking Kittens | The Guard Review | I Can't Tell If You're Really Mother F*cking Dumb or Really Mother F*cking Smart









Comments

This review seemed more interested in being funny and snarky than telling us about the movie. Too interested in one-liners and inside jokes than the movie itself. I give the review 2 stars out of 4.

Posted by: logan at July 15, 2011 10:39 AM

I thought it was a useful review--1. Main character lame and martyr-ish. 2. Villain = exciting and gives a good performance that makes the movie worth watching if you're into that kind of thing. 3. Domenic Cooper a better actor than previously suspected. 4. Female lead unimpressive at best, but often naked. 5. Plot stupid, but film is both violently and sexually graphic.

I think I know everything I need to.

Posted by: Siege at July 15, 2011 10:46 AM

I always knew there was a right kind of casting for Dominic Cooper. He has been mis-cast as a romantic lead too often (which he doesn't have the looks or personality for) that it's clouded the mischievous kind of character he showed he's capable of portraying in History Boys.

Also: I love "communicollegebrow" and shall be using it from now on.

Posted by: PaddyDog at July 15, 2011 11:21 AM

On Pajiba, films generally get the review they deserve (stylistically). Imagine how many bad movies a reviewer has to sit through. It would get tedious writing perfunctory summaries and evaluations. Finding clever ways to Dennis Miller things up must be one of the consolations a reviewer has. Inevitably, the word play is going to get away from them every once in a while. As long as the movies get appropriate treatment and we get a sense of its quality and plot, I figure no harm no foul. For smaller films, such as those from festivals, they take a more straightforward approach.

I will admit to disappointment that we didn't get to see the "solid gold crotch shot" poster for this movie again.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at July 15, 2011 11:29 AM

Logan's comment makes it seem like he paid too much attention to the jokes he didn't like and failed to notice that the jokes actually pointed out many flaws in the movie, while also pointing out how the movie could have worked better, which would require attention to the movie itself.

I give Logan's sense of humor a 1 out of 5.

Posted by: Paultera at July 15, 2011 12:00 PM

Another potential movie-going experience, ruined.

But, yes: Heroes are often the least interesting people in their own movies, which means a movie's success often relies on the quality of the villain.

Posted by: , at July 15, 2011 12:39 PM

That wasn't Mother Teresa you dunce, it was Goethe.

Posted by: Blake Shrapnel at July 15, 2011 1:09 PM

I remember seeing the trailer for this and being interested. I might still be inclined to watch it.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at July 15, 2011 5:32 PM

Did you mean a Robert Palmer video vixen? Robert Plant videos usually have deserts or castles or Honeydrippers (depending on the decade).

Posted by: happy camper at July 16, 2011 12:45 AM

I'm agreeing with DeistBrawler. Because it's true. Also because he agreed with me the other week.

Posted by: Rest In Peace at July 16, 2011 11:02 AM

hey what was that comment about USC grads? the ones that will be more successful than this reviewer could ever aspire to be?

Posted by: Richard Doughs at July 17, 2011 4:53 PM

Poor review

Posted by: Bling at July 27, 2011 10:22 AM

The trouble is that we have a bad habit, encouraged by pendants and sophisticates, of considering happiness as something rather stupid. Only pain is intellectual, only evil interesting. This is the treason of the artist: a refusal to admit the banality of evil and the terrible boredom of pain.

Posted by: K. Le Guin at July 29, 2011 11:54 AM

K. Le Guin just blew my mind.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at July 29, 2011 1:58 PM

Seconded Mrs. J. Also, the review was fine.

Posted by: Socraz6 at July 29, 2011 2:58 PM

LOLs for communicollegebrow and the "Mother Teresa" quote.

Posted by: RichieRich at July 31, 2011 4:49 AM

Yeah, I thought the review covered everything I need to know about the movie and still gave some very fun portmanteaus. I think, even though the review made me feel that the movie isn't worth the $$ to see it in theatres, this will be one for the Netflix.

And Blake Shrapnel -- bwahahahahaha!! Love it!

Posted by: Double R at August 4, 2011 7:34 PM

You do say "this" a lot, in the first paragraph.

Posted by: The Dude at August 25, 2011 11:07 AM