the_blair_witch_project_05-19.jpg
A Year Later Their Footage Was Found


The Films of 1999: The Blair Witch Project / Steven Lloyd Wilson

Film Reviews | October 28, 2009 | Comments (55)


“But the car’s not far - we’re just not going to be able to find it in the dark.” - Heather

It’s the stuff of urban legend: a trio of college kids goes missing in the woods and a year later their video camera is found, the surviving footage documenting the last terrifying hours of an inexplicable ordeal. The filmmakers (Daniel Myrick and Eduardo Sánchez) spun their non-existent budget into part of the narrative of the film itself. Three kids (the actors, using their real names of Heather Donahue, Joshua Leonard, and Michael Williams) in film school take two cameras into the woods in order to make a short documentary on the Blair Witch, a local legend in the Maryland backwoods. The characters interview real locals on camera about the legend.

The approach runs into a few problems: excessively shaky camera work for one, an unfortunate side effect of Heather having never used a camera prior to the shoot and receiving only a two day crash course in its use. At points, the characters are a bit too self-conscious about the requirement to film, lapsing several times into “oh look at the neat thing the directors must have left for us, let us look at it and ogle.”

The film excels though in its “found footage” niche, never breaking the wall and transitioning into third person story telling. The actors actually lived much like the characters lived during the duration of the eight day shoot, harried by the directors all night, kept on short rations to drive them squirrelly. It was like method acting on crack, the actors goaded into the tension and fear of their characters and ordered to film themselves all along. Basic cues and direction were given via notes left in milk crates each morning, but the bulk of the reaction and dialogue was improvised on the fly by the actors themselves. If I was one of the actors, I probably would have started to suspect that I was actually in an elaborate snuff film about half way through shooting.

The film starts slowly, introducing us to the characters getting ready for their foray into the woods, meeting with locals, establishing their relationships in that typical student gray area somewhere between friend and professional acquaintance. For the first half of the film, there is little to be scared of, just the gradually mounting feeling that something is not right with the woods. Their early problems seem to be bad luck and happenstance, taking far longer than expected to hike seemingly short distances. Heather seems to be botching the reading of the map. Pouring rain slows their progress down to a miserable pace. They struggle across a flooding river and log bridge, stumbling across a clearing with seven piles of rocks, the number of victims claimed by the Blair Witch. This is the turning point at which the vague threat of the woods closes in like a fist on the three characters.

The tension ratchets up through the rest of the film as they get more and more lost, finding themselves back where they started after hiking for fifteen hours. Noises, laughter, strange symbols and piles of rock appearing around their tent in the night. There’s never any explanation, any pattern, it’s the classic chaos of the boogieman story, never seen, only sensed. The film’s brilliance (and necessary limitation) is that it never ever shows the shark. Even in the final moments of horror, nothing is actually seen. Psychological horror uses context to generate horror in the mundane, fear in a handful of dust. In that sense, The Blair Witch Project is one of the most perfect psychological horror films ever made, with hardly a single frame of footage drawing horror from anything but its context. Rustling noises aren’t scary, pouring rain isn’t scary, piles of rocks aren’t scary, a guy standing in a corner isn’t scary. But all of these things can be terrifying enough to induce coronaries if surrounded by the right context. The screen is an impenetrable wall that lets us look closely at things that would be horrifying in person, but it also gives us the false confidence to dismiss the little nagging fears. The things that aren’t scary once the sun rises also aren’t scary seen through the protective filter of a movie screen. Psychological horror aims to rip down that barrier and truly make the audience empathize on a visceral level with the characters.

The Blair Witch Project feels like an urban legend throughout, playing up that ancient fear of getting lost in the woods, that paranoia rooted in the unknown that has grown more acute as we’ve caged nature over the centuries and held it at further remove. It’s no coincidence that the nominal leader of the three (Heather) is a control freak, abrasively confident when everything is proceeding according to plan, and disintegrating when circumstance moves outside the planned box. The entire film plays on our need to control, shoves a control freak into a situation where the rules don’t work. Use the map, follow the compass, head back the way you came, find the car, follow the river, these are all logical steps, but it assumes rationality holds any sway in these particular woods. At no point do the characters caught in the snare of chaos try to figure out what the new rules are, upon which logic these woods depend, if any. The most egregious “person doing something stupid in a horror movie” moment is the point at which Mike admits that he threw the map into the river because it was useless anyway. It’s at face value indefensibly stupid, completely irrational, but at the same time it’s precisely the right impulse.

There is a repeated futile complaint by the characters that this sort of thing just doesn’t happen, that people don’t just vanish in America, not realizing that once they entered these particular woods, they weren’t really in America anymore.

“It’s not the same on film is it? I mean, you know it’s real, but it’s like looking through the lens gives you some sort of protection from what’s on the other side.” - Joshua

Steven Lloyd Wilson is a hopeless romantic and the last scion of Norse warriors and the forbidden elder gods. His novel, ramblings, and assorted fictions coalesce at www.burningviolin.com.


Pajiba Love 10/28/09 | 25 Fights I'd Like To See Between Characters Played By The Same Actor





Comments

remember the hype, and seeing this movie when it first came out.. my friend was terrified and i was completely... underwhelmed.

Posted by: Alex at October 28, 2009 2:23 PM

Blair Witch was not scary, it was boring and the "characters" were annoying. The shaky cam technique only made me nauseated and I had to "watch" most of the movie with my eyes closed. I HATE that it spawned even more shaky cam films!

Posted by: peachfish at October 28, 2009 2:26 PM

I probably would have really enjoyed this movie had I been able to watch it. Sadly, the movement of the camera was waaaaay too much for me, especially on the big screen. I spent the whole time looking at my lap with my hand covering my eyes. When you just listen to the movie? It's really isn't exciting.

Posted by: Jeni at October 28, 2009 2:27 PM

Nitpicky, I know, but it's cues here.

Posted by: mswas at October 28, 2009 2:27 PM

I love roller coasters, I can ready in a moving vehicle, I love being on boats...but my stomach cannot handle shaky cam on the big screen. If I watch it at home I still have to keep lights on, otherwise (in a dark room) it still has the same effect.

Posted by: peachfish at October 28, 2009 2:32 PM

Wonderful review! I, too, remember all the hype and had to wait until it was released on dvd to see it.I admit it was spooky, but I craved more back story

Posted by: brite at October 28, 2009 2:32 PM

Only moment in the whole show I liked was the very, very end in the basement. Other than that, it took a whole lot of Gravol to get through it.

On that note, ever see what happens when someone eats 20 Gravol at once? Funny shit ensues.

Posted by: Xtreme at October 28, 2009 2:34 PM

Damn, is the excessively shaky camera work in TBWP primarily Heather's doing? I've gotta go back and check that out. If so, women in found footage films are setting the cause of female camera operators back decades because in PA, the closest I got to yelling at the screen was nearly saying "Goddammit, for shit's sake, do NOT hand the fucking camera back to Katie, don't d-oh for fucks sake...ok, I'll be watching the exit sign for a bit here..." and I'm not talking about scary scenes, I'm talking about panning 45 degrees in a room while talking without making it look like the operator is an epileptic ostrich riding a disco roller coaster.

Posted by: laredo at October 28, 2009 2:36 PM

Msas: exactly.

Yeah, so how are we concerned readers supposed to discreetly email typos etc to the authors of these reviews (for your own good you know) if there is no email contact info? We all just want a little QA around here. We are THAT type of crowd.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at October 28, 2009 2:37 PM

True story:

A month or so ago I was taking some of my teenage girl students for an un-mounted trail excursion (we led the horses and walked on foot) down to the state park adjoining our stables. On the way down the hill in the woods we noticed some very conspicuous piles of stones in the road.
Instant.
Creeps.

We gave them a wide berth.

Seriously, that movie has ruined me.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at October 28, 2009 2:44 PM

I loved this movie. Scariest thing I had ever seen then, and I haven't been that scared by a movie again. Maybe it was just that the timing was perfect, and I was just at the perfect age to watch and be terrified by it, but I think it's a pretty effective movie if you let yourself get into it. Doesn't work on repeated viewings, maybe (though you do catch a LOT of little things you might've missed the first time) but it totally worked the first time I saw it.

And goddamn, that header picture still gives me the jeebies.

Posted by: figgy at October 28, 2009 2:46 PM

This is actually, to this day, one of my favorite films. People are filled with shock and dismay when they hear me say this, but it's true, I fucking love The Blair Witch Project.

Everything about the film is close to perfection, especially the shaky camera work, and the chunks of unanswered questions. Driving the frustration, and isolation the characters felt, straight home.

Most view this movie now a days with a sour taste, they were "underwhelmed" or felt lied to or couldn't deal with the cinematic blue balls the last 2 minutes leave you with. Well phooey.

Great movie.

Posted by: Brian at October 28, 2009 2:51 PM

It scared the crap out of me because at the time I was going to college in rural Maine. Maine is over 50% woods and it takes 12 hours to go from the top to the bottom. People don't realize that you really CAN get "lost in America" until they go up there. Even loggers don't go down some roads or paths because they'll never find you.

I'll always remember this movie because we brought a sweet innocent girl from the Czech Republic to see it, and she spent 98% of the movie with her eyes closed. She got scared just hearing the screams!

Posted by: scorzi at October 28, 2009 2:55 PM

Another facet of the Blair Witch phenomenon was the marketing campaign that wormed it's way into our heads before we even really knew about the movie. There were 1 hour 'documentaries' on the Sci-Fi channel about the Blair Witch legend, complete with interviews of witnesses and 'anthropologists' who analyzed the site where the backpack containing the footage was found. There were all kinds of websites about the paranormal that cropped up about the Blair Witch. It was pretty believable. I had a friend who got curious and started checking out all of the Google hits for The Blair Witch and decided something was fishy when he couldn't find a single reference on the internet more than 1 year old.
It really was genius.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at October 28, 2009 2:55 PM

Mmmmmmm, you all THAT from this movie?


Maybe I watched it wrong...

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 28, 2009 2:58 PM

Steven, I don't like the way you spell your name. I'm going to start spelling it "Stephen." I prefer that. Carry on.

Posted by: Nicole at October 28, 2009 3:00 PM

Yawn.

I was totally underwhelmed by this movie. I saw it about halfway through the summer of 1999 but by then the marketing campaign had been bunked and then debunked and then rebunked.

I went into it wanting so badly to be scared and all I got out of it was a stomach ache caused by a jumbo sized bucket of popcorn and Shaken Camera Syndrome.

Homeboy standing in the corner was pretty creepy, but other than that, I found it to be relatively boring.

And, that Heather person really bugged the crap right out of my colon. I remember her standing on stage at some award show (maybe the Golden Globes? I don't remember. I drink a lot.) and I remember an overwhelming urge to punch the television.

Posted by: stopthemadness at October 28, 2009 3:13 PM

My best friend and I saw this before the hype really began. I remember after the movie ended, the audience didn't make a sound - nobody spoke to each other, everyone just got up and silently filed out. Afterwards, my friend and I went to her sister's (we were visiting), and we ended up sleeping in each other's bed with the light on because we were so freaked out. And for months afterwards, her husband liked to freak her out by ensuring she found him standing in the corner when she entered a room.

So yeah, Blair Witch scared the beejesus outta me.

I'm planning on seeing Paranormal Activity, and I have no doubt I will start regretting it in the theatre.

Posted by: Melissa at October 28, 2009 3:18 PM

The film’s brilliance (and necessary limitation) is that it never ever shows the shark. Even in the final moments of horror, nothing is actually seen.

And this is why the movie lost me, just a little bit. I do think it's a great horror movie (though I can understand people who don't care for it). But the fact that no threat is ever actually seen is what made me not really think about it much afterwards. There was nothing, in retrospect, to be scared of. Contrast that with The Ring, which also limited the audience's exposure to the thing-we're-supposed-to-be-scared-of, but showed just enough of it that there was something I could imagine in the dark after I turned out the lights that night. Both movies scared the hell out of me as I was watching them, but only The Ring CONTINUES to scare me.

Still, good movie, though.

Posted by: Todd at October 28, 2009 3:19 PM

Generally I'm the first to get sick with shaky-cam work but this didn't bother me much. Having worked with grad students, I knew a few who were very much like Heather, which upped the realism for me, and I much prefer horror when they leave some stuff to your imagination instead of showing lots of gore. Yes, there are slow bits. Not many movies are perfect.

But little things like the rock piles and the stick sculptures, that showed someone perhaps a little unbalanced had passed through recently, created a lot of tension. The little kids giggling that they hear in the dead of night in the middle of the woods where there shouldn't BE any freakin' little kids was terrifying to me. Josh's disappearance, the discovery of that bloody package the next day--they were all bizarre, unexplained events that really made me wonder just what the hell were they dealing with, was it human, could it be fought, and how awful would it be to suddenly find yourself in a place that should be familiar but now makes no freakin' sense?

Didn't help that shortly after watching, I moved to a house with 7 acres of woods that closely resembled the woods in the film. With lots of rocks. Sometimes imagination can be a bad thing.

Posted by: DeadBessie at October 28, 2009 3:25 PM

The laughing children and the tent slapping were hands-down the scariest part of the movie. You were already terrified by the repeated noises--and who isn't terrified of hearing things in the woods in the middle of the night? Even more terrifying that they were RHYTHMIC noises. So you were already tense as hell from that and then...children laughing? In the completely solitary woods in the middle of the night? Oh, fuck no. Just thinking about it really creeps me out.

Posted by: figgy at October 28, 2009 3:31 PM

Love that line from The Waste Land. Nice review.

Posted by: GunStreetGirl at October 28, 2009 3:32 PM

Nice Waste Land reference in there, Stephen.

I agree with you on most points. I think that the Blair Witch Project was both the beneficiary and the victim of it's spectacular hype machine. It worked at the beginning- huge box office, etc. But as time wore on, even way back when, it became sort of a joke, and the backlash began.

Ignoring the hype and backlash, was it the scariest movie ever? no. It was uncomfortable in a good way, and I can tell you, having seen it before it became a "phenomenon," the audience was terrified. What stands out for me was it's uniqueness. So unlike anything before it... Gotta give it props for that.

I also have to admit that I was a little unsettled by it- I lived, at the time, where I worked, and I was all alone every weekend. I had a hard time sleeping that night... And I'm a grown ass man, built like a linebacker.

Posted by: logar at October 28, 2009 3:34 PM

I went to see this movie as a teenager with my best friend. We had entirely different reactions. I went through the whole movie just waiting for the insufferable characters to be killed off.

My friend, on the other hand, said to me as we were walking out, "And the scariest thing about it is that it's a true story!"

I literally smacked her in the forehead.

Posted by: Alexandra at October 28, 2009 3:38 PM

I have no issue with shaky cams. It's never bothered me.

I really enjoyed this movie. I loved it in the theater and the once or twice I've watched it on DVD. The guy standing in the corner at the end gets me every time.

Posted by: Forbiddendonut at October 28, 2009 3:43 PM

I never saw this movie.
I did see its porn equivalent, the Bare Wench Project. I was under the influence of something illegal at a friend's house. The shaky cam coupled with heaving fake bosoms made me so nauseated that I stumbled off into a bedroom to lie down.
But I always thought it was drugs that made the shaky cam so unbearable.
The more you know . . .

Posted by: myysharona (formerly Sharon) at October 28, 2009 3:48 PM

I really liked this movie. It was a pretty original idea for its time, which is cool. It managed to creep me out without cheap and tired blood and gore. Not an easy thing to do. I really liked the way they used the power of suggestion and subtlety for the scares. Maybe some did find these characters "annoying". I found them to be realistic and natural. (I felt like I already knew these people) They were all far better actors than you usually get in any teen horror flick. The movie created this overall feel of good, old fashion spookiness and I love to break it out every October to get myself all psyched up for Halloween.

Posted by: bubblegumshoe at October 28, 2009 3:57 PM

Psychological horror uses context to generate horror in the mundane, fear in a handful of dust. In that sense, The Blair Witch Project is one of the most perfect psychological horror films ever made, with hardly a single frame of footage drawing horror from anything but its context.

I'm sorry. There's subtle psychological horror (my favorite), and then there's a film where a trio of whiny characters get lost in the woods and react to things not seen by the viewers. I think Polanski's Repulsion or maybe even Val Lewton's Bedlam are far stronger examples of psychological horror films that show little and accomplish so much. I mean, you see a dead rabbit festering on the table or a mentally ill young man collapse after being coated in gold leaf, but nothing more graphic than that. Both are far scarier without having a paranormal element than The Blair Witch Project.

Blair Witch is an exercise in brilliant marketing. It's about the only thing I like about the film. The hype machine was deafening and nothing this extensive had been tried before through the internet. If the film had actually matched the quality of the advertising scheme, I'd probably be a big fan. I don't think it even comes close.

I enjoyed your review, but strongly disagree on most of the points you made.

Posted by: Robert at October 28, 2009 4:14 PM

The only movie to ever give me nightmares, I thought the film was just brilliant.

Sure I was 18 at the time, but it had also been heavily debunked (so the hipster/cool kids were busy trying to make fun of it everywhere you went). However, just like Paranormal Activity, you have to believe in the story and go with it for it to have an impact.

And it sure did. Dreamt about standing in that corner WAY too often for my own good.

Wonderful review!

Posted by: misterorange at October 28, 2009 5:07 PM

I was teaching 8th graders when this came out. After one too many kids coming to school actually freaked out thinking it was real (early in the marketing stuff) and one too many times assuring them it was not (I knew it wasn't a documentary, but that's about all I knew), I decided to see it.

I wanted to slap, choke and kick Heather about three minutes in, so you can imagine how I felt when we got to the snotty nose close-up.

However, I did think it was pretty good with the fuck with your mind genre. I feel like a doofus, but I thought the guy standing in the corner was peeing. So I thought "WHAT THE HELL?" when it abruptly ended like that. So he was pissing, and she fell and busted her head open or something? And then he disappeared because he was scared he'd be blamed?

After it was explained to me, I felt totally retarded. But I agree the ending was much better that way than with him pissing.

About the shaky cam: it always bothers me for the first several minutes, then it's like my eyes/brain gets used to it or something. Same thing with those Bourne movies.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at October 28, 2009 5:32 PM

i saw this in the theater before any hype had really gotten to me. i think i may have teared up i was so scared. this movie is the reason i refused to camp for ten years.

Posted by: katie b at October 28, 2009 5:40 PM

The thing that bugged me were those early scenes where they get lost in the woods. Having grown up and hiked all my life in Oregon, I kept whispering to my friends in the theater that all they had to do when they found the stream was to go down it. Instead they wander around forever in circles. There's even a scene where they realize they have been going in circles.

FACE PALM!

They were in freaking Maryland...going downstream would have eventually lead them to civilization or even Chesapeake Bay! It might be a long forced march, but you'd do it if you were being stalked by an evil spirit.

I know, I know, it's also supposed to be spooky and magical that they are lost in the film, but damn, they dont even give themselves a chance. Idiots.

I think that's why the kids were laughing at them.

Posted by: anderbot at October 28, 2009 6:46 PM

Saw this film in the cinema and hated it. I'm in Ireland so obviously all the hype surrounding it had been played out for ages and its was a big anti-climax. But.....rented it out a few months later and watched it at home, alone in the dark. Scared the bejeesus out of me. I live out the country in the middle of nowhere so that probably didn't help. But the bit near the end where the guy is standing in the corner? Scary.

Posted by: sheepeyes at October 28, 2009 6:54 PM

This movie scared the bejeebus out of me. And I am not afraid to admit it....

Posted by: Janey at October 28, 2009 6:57 PM

All i got from this movie was 10$ poorer...oh and the camera work was so bad I threw up, on the floor outside the theatre in the hall- and I DO NOT get motion sick. I didnt find it scary at all. I did however feel bad for the person who had to break out the carpet cleaner.

Posted by: elusive at October 28, 2009 7:25 PM

I have never seen this movie nor do I have any real urge to see this movie.

What's your thoughts on this? Should I see it? My husband says (and I do quote, oh my brothers) "Sweet baby jesus, no. Worst. Movie. Ever."

He has good taste (Brotherhood of the Wolf aside) in movies so I've always trusted his judgement. But now...now I question.

Posted by: Kelly at October 28, 2009 7:31 PM

I think I saw this in the wrong environment. I was in a well-lit house, full of people who were coming and going from the room and making lots of noise. I really didn't like it or find it effective at all. Maybe I need to be alone in a darkened room...

Posted by: Daniel Hall at October 28, 2009 7:41 PM

I saw this at the local indie theater with my parents, aunt and uncle. I was 12 at the same and it terrified me for days. Even worse, my uncle decided to build one of those creepy stick people and put it on our front door when for when we got home later that night.

Posted by: schrome1019 at October 28, 2009 8:54 PM

So you and your friends are lost in the woods. You have brilliantly thrown away the map. Lost, sleep deprived and scared.

BUT.

All of you smoke. You are in an area with a creek and trees and brushy twiggy kindling all around you. Why wander around for another day waiting for the witch? Set a massive fire on one side of the creek in a more rocky area, and wait for the fire companies from the three surrounding counties to rescue you. Sure there are fines to pay, the environment is harmed, etc. But at the end of it all, if you stay out of the fire, you are alive. And possibly the witch is dead - as it is common belief that burning kills witches.

Posted by: Maria at October 28, 2009 9:10 PM

I actually remember an interview with the actors in which they stated they DID start wondering if they'd been taken into the woods to die.

I was a sophomore in college when this came out. My friends and I bought into the hype and waited in line to get tickets to the special midnight showing. A guy in the parking lot offered my boyfriend and me $30 for our tickets. We turned it down.

That night, I made it 30 minutes into the film and felt the walls close in. I got dizzy and terribly nauseated. I ran out of the theater and puked in the a garbage can in the lobby. Turns out, bouncy cameras make me extremely motion sick which is pretty funny since I'm a roller coaster junkie who can read books sitting in the backseat of a car. My friends never let me live it down, especially since a local entertainment reporter mentioned my "incident" in his article.

I finally saw the movie a few weeks later. On Dramamine.

Posted by: superEdna at October 28, 2009 10:00 PM

I get motion sickness very easily but this one didn't bother me.

Yes it became overhyped- but I saw it on a whim, the first night it was out... several days after a pretty serious knee surgery. So between the Percocets and just happy being out of the hospital, I loved this movie.

What you don't see, what you have to imagine in your own brain and nightmares, is ALWAYS scarier than what's shown on the big screen. (Except Hannibal Lecter...Hopkins nailed that entire character).

I still hesitate a bit at night when heading downstairs to my basement all alone.

Posted by: Be Adequite! at October 28, 2009 10:18 PM

Anderbot I think the point was that no matter what they did, the 'witch' would keep making them go in circles. I guess they didn't want to do that in the movie as it would be too unrealistic to film, but I think that was the idea behind it. Also I guess they were too scared and tired to think straight.

Kelly, I think you should watch it. If only to make up your own mind about it. You could be pleasantly surprised!

Posted by: figgy at October 28, 2009 11:05 PM

Shakycam doesn't bother me. 240 edits in a 120-second trailer, now THAT bothers the everliving motherloving FUCK out of me.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at October 29, 2009 12:11 AM

Well it scared me. I made the mistake of watching it alone at night, and as soon as it got to the bit with kids hitting the tent (or whatever it was to do with kids, kids in horror films are frickin hateful) I had to turn it off. Then I told myself I was being silly and put it back on. I lasted five more minutes and turned it off again and put something fun on instead. I still had to sleep with all the lights on and was sure something was creeping up the stairs.

My imagination is evil. The scariest bit about the film is that you don't see anything. The whole time I was expecting something to jump out at the camera, and if it had I'd have probably jumped but then been ok with it. The not seeing is what got me.

Posted by: Carrie at October 29, 2009 6:17 AM

i know that guy mikey being all spooky in the corner of this movie! we went to college together. he was part of an improv troupe and now he shows up on law & order occasionally. he was part of this shoot right after graduating college and there was a rumor that he had died on a camping trip and that's why no one had seen him all summer. when he showed up in town again we were all "wtf??" and he explained he had been shooting a movie about dying in the woods. just goes to show you how the game of telephone gets played in a university theater dept.
i like the movie. it scared me enough. the three actors got totally screwed on the $$$ end though and for that i'll never ever go see another movie these filmakers make.
the end.
and fuck a bunch of capital letters this early in the morning.

Posted by: JenVegas at October 29, 2009 7:41 AM

The most interesting legacy of The Blair Witch Project is it really proves how subjective the horror genre is. Half the people say it was boring and stupid, the other half are terrified by it. I think it depends entirely on the type of person you are, what you find fundamentally scary, and how you interact with media. I very rarely can separate myself from entertainment to say "It is only a movie/book/etc." When I am in the grip of a particular narrative, it dominates me. I have zero difficulty empathizing with what is happening on screen so their terror becomes mine. I have a very vivid imagination anyway, so the "realistic" horror movies really do a number on me. I am the type that is far more terrified of what you DON'T see, just another reason I hate the recent crop of gore filled films (Hostel, etc) that trade suspense for disgust. I don't find them scary, just tedious.

The 2nd best movie of the "shaky cam" horror genre is definitely "Open Water". That one is damn scary too, all the more so because the events are 100% plausible and people DO get lost in the ocean. It was scarier than "Blair Witch" too.

Really nice review, Steven.

Posted by: TylerDFC at October 29, 2009 8:08 AM

My 14 year old son bugged me relentlessly to take him to this movie. The hype was cresting, but not quite debunked yet. We went to The Little Art Theater, a small, cramped throwback to hometown theaters. No previews, just a pitch black theater filled with folks and we dived into the film.

I fell for it hook, line, and sinker. I slept with the lights on for a week. I still can't watch it by myself.

Posted by: Ignatz at October 29, 2009 8:09 AM

Saw it opening night, in Waco, TX after 6 or 7 beers with a buncha friends. Totally fun. Never got sick from the motion.

Christmas '99, I made a Blair Witch stick figurine for an ornament exchange. I don't think anyone understood what it was. I was disappointed and took it home for my own tree. Pop Culture Reference 0 - My idiot friends 1.

In Fall of 2000, did a class group project where we had to show small group dynamics, in action through a film. We chose Blair Witch. Great examples throughout the film: isolated small group who drive themselves nuts.

Posted by: gunnertec at October 29, 2009 8:50 AM

Just know a great celeb site ___Tallconnect CO M___ where you can me et many big beautiful wo man and hand some guys.

Posted by: Oliver45 at October 29, 2009 9:43 AM

The first time I saw this movie I made the mistake of going to a Saturday afternoon matinee. The audience noise (screaming babies, baby mama drama, etc) ruined the experience for me completely. The second time I saw it was at night with a bunch of college kids. I still remember it as the single last time I have ever, EVER heard an entire audience shut the hell up.. and STAY shut the hell up.. throughout an entire movie. So for that, if nothing else, I hold this movie in high regard... and I still go to actual big-screen theaters now and then hoping to find another movie that has the same sort of power.

Posted by: Ray at October 29, 2009 10:18 AM

I didn't see this in the theater, so when my department decided to do BWP as a Halloween decorating theme, I really didn't get it. Everyone dressed in hiking/camping clothes, we actually set up a tent in our department, and someone made lots of those little stick figures. Then I rented it when it came out on video. I watched it in broad daylight and it creeped me out.

My husband was annoyed I'd watched it without him, so we watched it again--after dark. He grew up on a lake, his house backed up against woods, and the hands tapping on the tent scene terrified him, because (unlike me at that time) he had been camping and slept outdoors overnight. He told me that when you're sleeping in a tent, every noise is amplified by your imagination, and the scariest thing you can think of is someone coming up and tapping on the tent or making noises right outside it.

I'm not sure why, but the house in the woods really gave me the shivering willies. Someone in the comments above mentioned they'd liked to have seen more of a backstory. Being the nerd that I am, I bought the "Blair Witch Project Dossier," which was just a companion paperback that explained all the backstory and had lots of plausible-looking documents regarding the fictional project and the search for the students. Believe me, the backstory was plenty creepy and scary.

But I agree with others: this movie got me precisely because it didn't show me too much (leaves what's scary up to the imagination) and because it was (at that time) a fairly original way of telling a story.

Posted by: Noelegy at October 30, 2009 1:53 AM

Just watched this for the first time. It was okay. Definitely felt the suspense at the end. As for the boarded up house, all I could think was "are you guys idiots? If ever there was a place a bunch of murderous locals would hang out in, that would be it!" Of course, growing up in SE Pennsylvania, I saw tons of houses like that on the roadsides. Very creepy.

Posted by: Minty at November 1, 2009 1:29 AM

Right on, Tyler -- both your philosophy about the subjectivity of horror, and the fact you're the only other person I've ever met, besides myself, who likes Blair Witch AND Open Water (the review for which was where I made my first comment on Pajiba, sans alias).

Posted by: Rykker at November 3, 2009 6:10 PM

I watched BWP last night by my self and it scared the heck out of me, so creepy. At the very end when Heather followed Mike down to the basement and Heather screaming Miiike! over and over agin in that bloody murder bone chilling scream gives me the chills! I must have imitated that scream today a hunderd times, although not as loud and it gave me the chilly whilly's every time! It was very suspenceful and thats why it was scary!!!
I wanted to save Mike, he looked like a little boy standing in that corner. I have 2 boy's of my own and it just hit to close to home, thinking that someone's boy was in danger in the creepy old house in haunted woods!!

Posted by: Julie Averill at November 4, 2009 3:11 AM

I remember scaring the crap out of my boyfriend with this movie. He was working on his dissertation research back then and hadn't heard any of the film's hype/mythos at all, and I didn't tell him. He about shit himself, and I was so very amused...

Posted by: Jerry at November 12, 2009 4:06 AM





Post a comment

 (required)

 (required)


Preview of your comment:



Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.