web
counter
 

The Big Year Review: A Movie for Retirees Killing Time and Waiting to Die

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (12)



The-Big-Year-Trailer.jpg

The Big Year is about a bird-watching competition not that you’d know it from the advertising. I’ve seen half a dozen TV spots and trailers, and somehow, the marketing team behind the film has managed to avoid revealing the most crucial piece of information about the movie. From the adverts, I’d have no idea what The Big Year was about; I’d only know that Jack Black, Steve Martin 2.0, and Owen Wilson were in it, and typically, that’s enough to steer most of us away.

But the reality is, they’re the best part about The Big Year. Steve Martin avoids pratfalls and crinkles his eyes endearingly, as he does in the best scenes of his terrible family movies; Jack Black is uncharacteristically low key and likable; and Owen Wilson is well-suited to the role of sympathetic asshole. It’s not a broad comedy, it’s neither silly nor dumb; and it never reaches for cheap laughs. In fact, it never reaches for laughs at all.

Indeed, the problem with The Big Year is the exact problem the marketing attempted to work around: It’s a movie about a bird-watching competition. It is not secondary to the plot; bird watching is not used as a backdrop to tell a larger story. It’s simply a movie about a bird-watching competition, about three men who race around for a year to identify as many species of birds as possible in North America. The winner gets … bragging rights. There is a nod toward self-discovery, but really, even that’s incidental to the hundreds of species of birds that are on display.

Steve Martin plays Stew, the CEO of a large nondescript company that he retires from in order to take on his Big Year; Jack Black plays Brad, an aimless guy who lives with his parents and decides to do a Big Year to give his life some meaning and purpose; and Owen Wilson is Kenny, the Big Year record holder who puts his family-life on hold in order to maintain that record. The three of them go to distant places to find birds; they talk about birds when they’re together; and there’s a very friendly and harmless competitive rivalry between the them.

The truth is, it’s not a bad movie, but neither is it a good one. It’s a movie for bird watchers and the elderly (the screening I attended was packed with senior citizens; I can only assume the National Audubon Society organized an outing). It’s not a movie to get worked up over in either direction: It’s okay; there’s not a lot of drama; the stakes are very low; and the conflict is superficial. But, it passes the time; the scenery is nice; the characters are likable; and bird watchers will undoubtedly appreciate it (there were occasional cheers from the attendees in my screening when a particular bird was spotted).

In short, it’s a lot like a doddering grandfather: Sweet, amiable, and kind of boring. But I have absolutely no malice against it. If you’re into birds, I’d recommend it. If not, it’s probably not going to float your banana stand.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Which Of These Phenomenal Young Actors Will Debase Themselves To Play John McClane Jr. In Die H5rd? | The 60 Coolest TV Show Title Sequences of All Time









Comments

I think you actually just slightly increased the odds of my seeing this someday from a probability that I previously would have placed at zero. I'm not a bird-watcher (although that's a title that appeals to me from a fantasy resume standpoint), so I simply must be getting old. My question is: if this is really just a low-key movie about bird-watching and not the comedy riot that trailers are trying to sell, how did they get these three guys attached in the first place? Did Martin, Wilson, and Black just decide it might be fun to hang out together in the outdoors for a few weeks?

Posted by: DarthCorleone at October 14, 2011 3:39 PM

I cannot believe that this movie is about bird watching! You are absolutely correct that the marketing completely avoids that issue. Like DarthCorleone, that info actually increases my interest in the film.

Posted by: tamatha at October 14, 2011 4:58 PM

Steve Martin


“Bringing Down the House”
“The Pink Panther I and II”

The. End.

Posted by: Pookie at October 14, 2011 7:03 PM

Steve Martin

The Jerk
Dead Men Don't Wear Plaid
All Of Me

Far. From. Over.

Posted by: Jerry at October 14, 2011 7:34 PM

Yup, I'm a birder (not a bird watcher, that distinction is even in the movie) and I liked it a lot. But I enjoyed it because of the portrayal of birding, not the birds. The birds were just nice scenery. It wasn't hysterical or anything, but it was a really nice movie and made me laugh after a very bad day. But I don't think "normal" people would enjoy it as much as I did.

Posted by: Chrissi at October 14, 2011 8:39 PM

Steve Martin

The Jerk
Dead Men Don't Wear Plaid
All Of Me

Far. From. Over.

Posted by: Jerry at October 14, 2011 7:34 PM

Jerry, you do know that “All of Me” was made in 1984? And the others were made even earlier than that. Hell, according to you, Martin’s latest hit is older than AIDS.

Posted by: Pookie at October 14, 2011 8:41 PM

Retirees killing time and waiting to die?? Oh, Dustin, you wound me! Just because I happen to be one of the very few non-retired people in my local birders' group, doesn't mean it's fair to lump us all together like tha...ah, hell...you're really not that far off the mark. *sigh*

Yep, I have a feeling I will enjoy this movie greatly on account of two of my guilty pleasures, bird nerdery and Jack Black. I'm actually rather relieved to hear it wasn't a painful experience even for non-birders.

Posted by: meaux at October 14, 2011 9:54 PM

Ok… I totally knew from the first commercial I saw that this movie was about birding. I don't know why, I don't bird, I don't have friends that are into birding, there was just something about it where I was like "Oh, it's about finding some super rare bird or something like that. Weird."

This means I'm magic. Obviously. Go me!

Posted by: Intern Rusty at October 15, 2011 2:27 AM

I read about this movie over a year ago and thought it looked like something I'd enjoy. Although I love zombies and violent revenge movies, I like an occasional low-key, scenic film. I'm not fond of Jack Black but if he's not cranked out of control, I think this sounds like a lovely movie.

Posted by: snapnhiss at October 15, 2011 11:08 AM

I saw it last night on a whim (we missed the earlier showing of Moneyball and the later showing was too late) and I enjoyed it. Not the best I've ever seen, but it was enjoyable. It was fun to watch the guys compete, and it was also a cool travelogue. I know nothing about birds, but that didn't really matter. If you have ever a) roadtripped b)been involved in a competition of any sort c)been obsessed with a particular subject d) done any of the aforementioned 3 to the detriment of personal relationships, you'd enjoy this movie.

Posted by: TurnipTheRadio at October 15, 2011 12:25 PM


good review and i will definitely see this " okay " movie ......
sounds like a pleasant enough diversion.
a phrase in the early part of the review caught my attention......
" cheap laughs ". dustin praises " bridesmaids " to the skies at
every opportunity but i wonder if the scene where mother nature
demanded immediate excretion to ease the intestinal distress of
the afflicted comes under the heading of a " cheap laugh "? i
laughed like the rest of the audience but never suspected the
film would have critics referring to it as a tribute to female
empowerment . i figure that laugh was plenty cheap.

Posted by: snake at October 16, 2011 3:00 AM

I wanted this to be good for no reason other than I want Steve Martin to not suck anymore.

Posted by: Protoguy at October 16, 2011 7:54 PM