frank%2520miller%2520the%2520spirit%2520blog%2520edit.jpg

Egg on His Face


The Spirit / Ranylt Richildis

Film Reviews | December 30, 2008 | Comments (35)


Frank Miller performs very well indeed, generally, at the drafting table. He performed well as Robert Rodriguez’ sidekick, clapping in delight each time he saw one of his panels come to life via green-screen. He doesn’t perform so well when he’s left alone in the studio with a passel of actors and techs staring at him with raised eyebrows, waiting for direction. Miller’s adaptation of The Spirit flails onscreen, and its death throes can’t even be mined for entertainment value. At best, The Spirit may find half-life some day as a novelty movie — something along the lines of the Star Wars Holiday Special or Nick Fury: Agent of SHIELD. It’s the kind of movie that might be a howl to watch in a drunken group setting but makes you want to claw your eyes out if you watch it alone. The novelty factor will be especially bright if Miller’s never given a solo film project again, which looks likely; it’ll be something for next-generation mega-fans to fondle ironically some day. As it stands, The Spirit is so underwhelming that it could put those of us who loved Sin City off the (upcoming?) sequels, the way a moldy crouton puts you off not just the entire salad but also the main course wending its way to your table. Miller’s handling of The Spirit is so pokey, in other words, that it threatens to tank the graphic panel stylization which until now looked as if it might become its own particular film genre.

You can’t fault someone like Miller for wanting to take a stab at the project. The Millers and Moores of the comic world admit to the impact of Will Eisner’s influence on their work. When Eisner launched The Spirit series in 1940 (with the help of a handful of co-writers), the grit that still informs today’s graphic novels was all over movie screens but rarely located in newsprint panels. Eisner helped bring real noir to the black backgrounds of the comic strip, along with half-hearted social conscience. He played with genres, turning The Spirit into a cocked fusion that proved popular enough to keep the strip going for over a decade and to inspire graphic artists on both sides of the pond years on. Eisner’s series, however flawed, is a classic, and its fans demand that the strip be treated not just with care but with extreme competence. Miller, working out of his depth in a medium he seems to understand only vicariously, has let those fans, and Eisner, down. But detaching The Spirit from its history and looking at the movie as a stand-alone piece of film doesn’t elevate the product in the least, either. Amateur direction almost always leaves a particular sheen that congeals over a work. In efforts like The Spirit, that sheen is the only thing that holds an otherwise incoherent scramble together, and it coats the acting, the line delivery and even the blocking a certain sour way. Miller is either very tentative or very reckless behind the helm; he’s certainly not schooled enough in filmmaking to pull off the deliberate camp he aims for, which almost always fizzles even in more experienced hands.

The basic elements of Eisner’s vision remain intact in movie form. The Spirit tells the story of Denny Colt (Gabriel Macht), a cop who remains suspended somewhere between life and death after catching a bullet. Rather than rotting underground, the Spirit fights crime in a domino mask and fedora. He works in the shadows for Central City’s Commissioner Dolan (Dan Lauria) and he’s generally useful, except when he gets addled by women; every woman in Central City is beautiful, and only a handful aren’t the far end of deadly. Apart from Dolan’s daughter Ellen (Sarah Paulson) and the odd damsel in distress, the Spirit can’t trust anything with tits. There’s his childhood sweetheart Sand Saref (Eva Mendes), a femme fatale characterized by her lust for money and gems; Silken Floss (Scarlett Johansson), a scientist on an arch-villain’s payroll; Plaster of Paris (Paz Vega), an assassin who belly dances up to her victims; Morgenstern (Stana Katic), a goofball rookie cop who shoots off a little too much friendly fire; and Lorelei Rox (Jaime King), the angel of death who’s eager to claim Colt for her side. Like Miller seems to be himself, the Spirit exists in a world gendered black and white, where women are always soft in all the right places, where they’re dressed in various fuck-fantasy costumes, and where they’re almost always looking for ways to mess with the penis. The Spirit also has to contend with the Octopus, motherfucked by Samuel L. Jackson dialed to his most outrageous — again. Miller’s version is a hybrid of the original Octopus — a master of disguise — and Dr. Cobra, the villain who mucked with Colt’s system in the original series and made him immortal. We don’t see Dr. Cobra in the movie. Instead we see pretty much all we’ll ever want to see of Jackson in over-the-top mode, stuffed into a parade of costumes more desperate to get a laugh than Gilbert Gottfried.

Miller has tried to reproduce the strip’s mash-up of noir, slapstick, fantasy, and social reportage, but his mix doesn’t cohere. His comedy falls flat and his bizarre tableaux waft that stink of desperation mentioned above, which is usually attached to poor Jackson. The Octopus and his hench-persons soup it up on fantasy stages that include a seppuku world and a Nazi Germany world, which almost almost almost work in their oddness. Johannson’s wooden shtick helps to forgive Jackson’s stink-bomb lines and places them on the edge of brilliant — but we can’t help being aware that her woodenness is partly due to an absence of talent (thespian and directorial), and that Miller probably considers those lines uncritically clever. It’s either that, or he believes he’s made a rollicking cult hit of the so-bad-it’s-good variety, but that takes a certain kind of gift, just as making a convincing film takes a certain kind of gift. Miller gives us neither; he can only give us something half-formed that time — and lots of it — may be able to knead into cult substance, but for now we’re forced to eat a bucketful of starter rather than honest to god comedic bread. The humor rings hollow, and the false notes are compounded by the lackluster story (forgivable in better films) and the meaningless allusions to all things Greek: Elektra complexes, the Argonauts and the Golden Fleece, Herakles, and Disney-humor winks n’ nudges at Hellenic vocab.

The sputtering plot follows Sand Saref’s quest for the Golden Fleece and the Octopus’ quest for the blood of Herakles, whose demi-god juice will somehow transform the Octopus into a full-blown divine. Sand and the Octopus are at odds over the same two treasure chests, and the Spirit winds up in the middle of the showdown. It’s too bad that Macht is rudderless in the lead role, because he might have otherwise given the story something to gel around, or given the movie a shot of character. The Spirit’s player should be charismatic — he should be the centerpiece, but that honor is left to the look of the film. Like the movie versions of Sin City and 300, The Spirit’s visuals are faithful to the sequential-art formula and to many of the source material’s original panels. The movie’s world shifts between monochromatic grays and browns — dotted by a single spot of red — and splintering black-and-white contrast. The effect is, of course, eye-candy for fans of graphic novels, who may or may not have had their fill yet of seeing static loved ones animated on a screen. But while Rodriguez was able to bolster Sin City’s dazzling comic-come-to-life effects with enough tension, story and acting to give his (and ostensibly Miller’s) project heart and lungs, solo Miller is forced to rely on visuals completely and lets other aspects of filmmaking slide. The actors rush through their lines and look a little lost onscreen, especially Macht, Johansson, and Lombardi, who plays several versions of a lunkhead cloned to infinity. Paulson holds her own, and Jackson no question gives his role everything he’s got, and Mendes is 80% steady and only 20% crap, but no one gives their character even the illusion of depth, which Sin City’s actors by and large managed to pull out of their archetypes.

Given the inevitable comparisons to Sin City, and given the affection many have for Eisner’s source material, turning The Spirit into a film would have been a risky proposition even for someone like Rodriguez or Del Toro or Raimi or any other director who knows his way around a set and appreciates the comic book’s influence on his own craft. The odds were stacked against anyone game enough to try; the camp approach to Chandleresque noir has been done, undone, and done again, and the slapstick that would have been accepted as natural (and probably always funny) in the 1940s is becoming harder and harder to pull off. The Spirit is tenderly dated and could only have been revived by a more nuanced thinker. Miller has never been nuanced or (dare I say it) much of a thinker’s thinker, however wonderful and troubling his graphic novels, and however deeply his paper worlds penetrate our bulks. Opening up ideas of love, loyalty, and protection demands a storymaker’s full attention, however “shallow” those ideas may appear as they play out in the comic genre. Onscreen, they bring the illusion of life with them — the distance closes and the audience expects the director’s full support. Miller delivers a half-formed result, as if his attention span gave out midway through the project. His cinematic world looks about as deep as a page. How he manages to give so much depth to mere paper in his graphic novels, yet make a “living” screen look so insubstantial, is this week’s peanut-gallery poser.

Ranylt Richildis plays with words and ideas in Ottawa, Canada. You can email her here.


Valkyrie Review | Curious Case of Benjamin Button, The Review



Comments

the Spirit can't trust anything with tits

I love cinéma vérité!

Who picked out the names for the female characters? If they're not mined from the source material, then a big fat raspberry for Miller, on top of the bad reviews for the flick.

Posted by: rikkitikkitavi at December 28, 2008 3:21 PM

Fuck you, Frank Miller. Fuck you.

And fuck you for even putting Frank Miller and Alan Moore in the same goddamn sentence. Frank Miller is nowhere near the league of Alan Moore. I don't think he's even playing the same ballgame.

Posted by: lise at December 28, 2008 3:27 PM

At best, The Spirit may find half-life some day as a novelty movie -- something along the lines of the Star Wars Holiday Special or Nick Fury: Agent of SHIELD.

Oh man, that's the shitty icing on the crap cake. To be relegated to those ranks? Goddamn. Miller should just kill himself now.

Posted by: Goldie at December 28, 2008 3:36 PM

Now now, lise, don't be too hard on the man. The Sin City series (I'm talking about the books here) is pretty fucking excellent, and it's really not a surprise that he's not a good director. A blind man could have seen that coming a mile away.

Posted by: the_wakeful at December 28, 2008 3:36 PM

I don't think Miller knows how to portray a female character other than as a one-dimensional sexpot.

The noirish '40s "vintage" dialogue of Sin City was admirable, but one-trick. To see it rehashed in similar format with the wooden dialogue doesn't have the wink-and-nod irony of meta-narrative, but begins to intimate at self-righteousness (taking itself too seriously) and predictability.

Recalling that the '40s was kind of terrible for cinema would be a necessary corrective to this sort of neo-nostalgia.

In other words, gimmick movies usually don't work more than once. Aside from some of the more memorable characterizations/performances in Sin City, it was a gimmick film.

Posted by: Recondite at December 28, 2008 3:45 PM

I think sometime back in the late 80's, early 90's, Frank Miller's comic vision was considered genius in that newfangled dark age of comics way. But as time has passed, the times have passed him up. "The Dark Knight Returns" was fantastic in 85-86, "The Dark Knight Strikes Again" was terrible in the aughts. If "All-Star Batman and Robin" had been released back then it might have been considered less insane (possibly a classic?), but because it was written in 2005-06, it is just fucking stupid. The man has not had a coherent or unique thought in at least 15 years.

I personally wish I could strangle the people responsible for giving Frank "What are you retarded? I'm The GOD-DAMNED BATMAN" Miller The Spirit.

Posted by: Ken Hart at December 28, 2008 4:06 PM

From the moment I saw the first trailer for this, I knew it would end this way. Terrible, just terrible.

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at December 28, 2008 4:48 PM

Frank Miller's not just a bad filmmaker. He lost his writing talent (which was great) about 15 years ago. Now he can only draw well.

Posted by: Lucas at December 28, 2008 5:04 PM

so alot of hot ass chicks and no nudity??pass,pass,pass!

Posted by: pasadenamike at December 28, 2008 7:04 PM

Disappointing. Was looking forward to another Sin City. The presence of Johansson is bad enough, but if I could stand Jessica Assba in Sin City, well...I can pretty much take anything.

Now on to the big question: Who the fuck is Gabriel Macht? I just imdb'd him and I've never seen him before.

Posted by: Joker at December 28, 2008 8:49 PM

A 1600 word treatise on why this movie sucks? With an in-depth look at the original series and why it didn't translate? I believe this is called nerd-love!

Posted by: Marra at December 28, 2008 9:03 PM

Gabriel Macht is the thoroughly adorable actor who played the thoroughly adorable lead in Because I Said So, the one Diane Keaton doesn't want her daughter Mandy Moore to end up with, but who does, in fact, end up with Mandy Moore.

He was adorable. ADORABLE. I have waited to hear of him in something that was more worthy of his charms.

This, evidently, is not it.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at December 28, 2008 10:11 PM

Ken Hart: Yes. I'm always confronted by the Sin City example when I vent my hatred of the Miller. But it's such a hackneyed attempt at noir, I can't stand it. I read four of the books in an attempt to find something to like, and failed.

But I love Hard Boiled. I'm pretty convinced that's Geoff Darrow's doing, though.

Posted by: Moogles at December 28, 2008 10:15 PM

Was anyone surprised by this? Good grief, the trailer looked godawful. The black and white "Sin City" look is all wrong for "the Spirit." Cheese and crackers.

I don't have a hate on for Miller, but let's face it, most of the "dark" comic writer boys from the Miller/Moore period treat female characters like the worst kind of "titties be bad" stereotypes.

Posted by: rottenkitty at December 29, 2008 12:07 AM

The sputtering plot follows Sand Saref's quest for the Golden Fleece and the Octopus' quest for the blood of Herakles, whose demi-god juice will somehow transform the Octopus into a full-blown divine.

Oh, to witness the birth of Godtopus!

Posted by: Iwantsprinkles at December 29, 2008 2:33 AM

Thanks, Ranylt, for expressing the complicated reaction I had to this movie so very well.

I've been trying to explain the experience to folks that asked me what I thought of the film. I am unfamiliar (for once) with the comic source material, but this movie struck me as having one of the most uneven tones of anything I have ever seen. It was like it wanted to be all things to all people: a comedy, a violent thriller, a self conscious tongue in cheek acknowledgement of comic conventions and anachronisms, a loving tribute to those comic conventions and anachronisms, a floor wax and a salad dressing.

I, too, felt that it might at best transmogrify into one of those movies that I'd end up really enjoying zoning out to on random Sundays, as I stared at TNT praying for hangover salvation.

I can't say I didn't expect it to be bad: I've had a niggling suspicion that Frank Miller let loose as an unfettered director would be catastrophic. But I give him props: I just thought he would lose his mind and be all blood and guts and cleavage shots and decapitations. Apparently that's just his fans who happen to be directors (and god bless Rodriguez and Snyder, cuz I loved Sin City and 300 for their BANG!POW popcorn fun).

But Miller seemed to actually want to have some humor, and possibly pathos? mixed in with the T&A and guns and boom boom. It just didn't fly.

And even though Sam Jackson was hog wild, I thought it was one of the more enjoyable parts of the film. Hyper stylized adaptations such as these seem to be the ideal place for manaical villains like that.

I'm rambling--I guess it's because this is one of those movies that had small moments that indicated it could have been so much more, which make its failures as a film that much more disappointing. It's not a heartbreaker, but as noted in the review, it's almost as if anytime a comic book adaptation fails it sets back "the movement."

*Shallow note: Gabriel Macht was very cute, and had a disturbingly attractive mouth. Hope he makes it out of this one to try again in another film.

Posted by: brodiekins at December 29, 2008 7:36 AM

And just think, at one point Brad Bird was lined up to do this movie.

*sigh*

Posted by: twig at December 29, 2008 8:41 AM

Well, I thought it was a silly, wiseass, knowing cartoon. Being "The Spirit" and Frank Miller, there was cheesecake too. I had a pretty good time. Maybe an animated movie based on Darwyn Cooke's run would be more fitting (like the "New Frontier" movie) but while I can't say it's good, I'm not complaining. Also, I don't have this problem with Scarlett Johansson. Besides, you all have "Wolverine" coming, so I'll feel no guilt in enjoying this.

I think this is where I scream "Speed Racer!" and go down in a hail of bullets.

Posted by: Jay at December 29, 2008 9:53 AM

I think this is where I scream "Speed Racer!" and go down in a hail of bullets.

Jay, give me some credit. I can both be impressed with at least 8/10 of Speed Racer and think that Frank Miller's completely lost what made Sin City and 300 exciting to watch, and possibly his mind as well.

Posted by: twig at December 29, 2008 10:37 AM

Well, that's more my ongoing vendetta against Ranylt of course.

Posted by: Jay at December 29, 2008 10:41 AM

Sorry, I kind of jump into nerd fights like a chubby shark on chum.

Posted by: twig at December 29, 2008 10:45 AM

it threatens to tank the graphic panel stylization which until now looked as if it might become its own particular film genre.

Oh Godtopus, I hope you're right. I can't even tell you how sick I am of this fucking overused gimmick. It needs to end NOW, as well as Frank Miller's reign of terror and all these shitty graphic novel movies. Blargh.

Scarlett Johanssen's as dull as a box of hair.

Posted by: figgy at December 29, 2008 12:08 PM

Miller's best work was almost always the result of collaboration with other talented creators. Left alone, his kinks and pathologies just become the lube for gratuitous and angry fetish jizz-bombs.

Posted by: firedmyass at December 29, 2008 12:51 PM

I like Frank Miller quite a bit though I have been baffled by his 5 year cold streak. I saw this and bit into my fist for 2 hours because it was so painful. Having read everything he's written for the last 20 years I say that his work, Ronin, some of the Sin Cities, can be transcendant. I'd rank him third behind Moore and Gaiman as the best comic writers of the last 30 years. The problem with the film, aside from the crappy digital movement that is destroying a lot of pictures, was that what works on paper doesn't directly translate. Miller wrote what would have been a slightly entertaining comic (still part of his slumming period), staying true to his usual style, and it fell flat -- as is 2 dimensional flat- on the screen. The actors didn't help, though I did like Macht. Had he been free to show the women topless, as he does in the comics, it might have barely made the leap to arrested development male geek porn goodness. There's just nothing to watch here cause your immagination isn't free to make the noir dialogue work, the fetishised women stay dressed, the digital crap sucks, and the director is clearly inexperienced.

Finally, there's a single moment early in the film when the love story establishes and a pair of kids do the movie's best acting and you think, 'hey, this guy still is a master storyteller'...then the rest of the movie slaps you over and over again in the face.

Posted by: oRrOY at December 29, 2008 12:54 PM

Jay,

I am sorry I am late for the party on Speed Racer but I waited for DVD to see it thanks in part to Ranylt's review. I am so sorry I did. I went back to the original comments from that review and I agree COMPLETELY with your comments there. I now share your vendetta against her. I am baffled by Speed Racer appearing on so many worst of 2008 lists. Rarely have I seen a filmmakers vision executed so wholly. I can't believe anyone bankrolled this film thinking they would get their money back, but if you were a fan of the original series I don't understand how you could be disappointed in this movie.

Posted by: Ed Newman at December 29, 2008 1:53 PM

As with "Krush Groove", time is gonna tell, Ed.

Mind you, my enemies list for that movie is obviously much longer than one person.

If the women were naked here it would've really been wrong for The Spirit and Miller would've caught unending hell for turning it into Sin City and being his irrepressible pervy self, and The Spirit is nowhere near Sin City in that respect. It never lets itself get that serious. I stopped buying them recently when Sergio Aragones took over though because then it just got too goofy. My biggest disappointment here was that the title wasn't made part of the architecture, per the book's MO.

I'm almost sad, though, that since Lionsgate probably won't want a sequel unless this thing grows EIGHT legs in the next week or two (HAW HAW), I'll never get to read "DUDE, Angelina Jolie should TOTALLY play P'Gell!!"

Posted by: Jay at December 29, 2008 2:14 PM

Miller put off Sin City 2 for this crap?!? No wonder Mickey Rourke is hesitant to sign back on. Damnit Miller, you had to "branch out" didn't you? You see what happens when you try? FAIL. Suicide really is the only answer. C'mon Frank, it won't hurt, just take some pills, drink a little wild turkey and take a hot, hot bath. Mmm, bubbles...sleep...

Posted by: smatt584 at December 29, 2008 3:56 PM

I hated Sin City. I was bored out of my effin mind for most of it. I had passing thoughts on seeing The Spirit, since I did kinda enjoy 300, but the boiling hatred I have for Scarlet Johannson put a quash on that REAL quick.

Posted by: Nadha at December 29, 2008 4:28 PM

Nadha, although i disagree with you regarding Sin City, your comment about Scarlet Johannson just restored my faith in humanity. Except Scarlet Johannson, that is. Bitch can't act.

Posted by: smatt584 at December 29, 2008 6:31 PM

So it hasn't been my imagination all along that ScarJo is a vacant stare with boobs? I mean, the girl is pretty and stacked but she lost me on "The Island" with that blank...stare.

How bout a totally random list of the (seemingly)dumbest actors/actresses?

Posted by: greer at December 29, 2008 6:44 PM

Dammit, now you're all just goading me with misspelling! You know that irks me!

Posted by: Jay at December 29, 2008 7:46 PM

I read the above review to the housemate, but insisted. We went.

Nothing could have prepared us for what we were subjected to. The noisy row of eighteen-year-olds actually walked out. I kept looking for Adam West.

We were quickly reduced to Mystery Science Theatre commentary as a survival mechanism. "I can't die..." (Oh, yes you can) "...but I can be bored!" (Us, too.) "We end this now!" (No, twenty minutes to go.)

I am glad I saw it, though, as it must represent the experience of the audience during the opening of 'Springtime for Hitler.'

Posted by: Karasu Amagoi at December 30, 2008 12:55 AM

It should've been Brad Bird who translated Eisner's stories to the big screen.. What a waste, what a huge fucking waste..

Posted by: Edo8 at December 31, 2008 9:39 AM

I was shocked when I found out that Frank Miller was directing this, then heard that it sucked also. Not surprising, Miller isn't a director, he's a writer, and a graphic novel writer at that. So directing is a longshot and may not even translate well on screen either. It's sort of how when Neil Gaiman directed that one movie and it was all over the place. Although the visuals were nice, so I suspect the same thing happened with this movie too.

Posted by: ph at December 31, 2008 2:39 PM

Anyone who's ever put eyes on that recent "Batman & Robin" series of Miller's can see where his mind's been at lately. The guy's all about dementia, sex, one-liners and no originality whatsoever. And then, this...

Posted by: godzillafoil at January 3, 2009 5:16 PM