425_speed_racer6_120707.jpg

Hollow Boom

Speed Racer / Ranylt Richildis

Film Reviews | May 10, 2008 | Comments (60)


I grew up in Western Quebec, which imported craploads of anime cartoons in the 1970s and early 80s by way of France. Children’s television in my neck of the woods teemed with characters with half-egg eyes, puppet mouths, spiked hair and absentee parents. Even stone kid-stupid, I could detect a real aesthetic difference between these sorts of cartoons and the Hanna-Barbera output my cousins in Ontario were watching. And because I was only eight years old (and kid-stupid), I used to think this strange cartoon aesthetic was a French quirk. It wasn’t until I was menstrual that I learned the true source of Astro Boy, Sophie and Battle of the Planets, or heard the word anime. Speed Racer, however, was completely off my radar—whether it never aired in my region or whether I suffered an accident of oblivion, I can’t honestly say. Whatever the reason, I missed my opportunity to develop any kind of nostalgic fondness for Speed Racer when I was young. Lacking that fanboy grease to shoe-horn me into interest, and being neither ten years old nor a gearhead (the only other two demographics bound to get excited by the film), Speed Racer turned out to be sixteen kinds of dull, the way formulaic kids’ movies usually are for folks who’ve lived more than two decades on this ball.

And I don’t mean that as sarcasm. I actually walked into the movie with a kernel of hope. Anime history aside, Speed Racer comes to the screen with a lovely kind of pedigree: the action-movie-director-turned-family-filmmaker tradition. And what a tradition that is. The Babe movies, which I love, were directed and/or written by George Miller, who also made Road Warrior (which I love). Spy Kids, which I didn’t hate, was directed by Robert Rodriguez, whose other, more adult output I love more often than not. Sure, I originally had to be headlocked into seeing both Spy Kids and the Babe movies before I discovered their charm (not trusting a family film further than I can throw it), but if the Babe pictures and Spy Kids have taught me anything, it’s that outrageous cult directors can often stir unexpected wonder out of the least likely genre. So given that Speed Racer has the Wachowski Brothers behind it (the makers of The Matrix, for those of you who cream at the mere sight of black plastic or a capital M), there was a long-shot chance the movie could have been one of those rare, dark-yet-bright hybrids beloved of both kids and adults alike.

Not this time. Peel back the anime references and the psychedelic production design, and you get exactly what you might expect from a movie that may have been conjured out of the steam of manga irony but was ultimately designed, packaged and marketed for the short set. Speed Racer, though it tries oh so hard not to be, isn’t much more than a connect-the-dots family movie, complete with hackneyed plot, cute-ass mugging, father-knows-best sentiment, and that patronizing Disney/Pixar humor which has always turned my guts. In fact, it’s almost impossible to see the bones of the original anime series through all the hallucinogenic lard (if fans are wondering). That may be fine if you want to kill two hours at the multiplex with the offspring (more on that below), but don’t bother hitting Speed Racer in a bid to satisfy your inner geek. You’ll end up starving him.

The Wachowskis are faithful to the characters and general premise of Tatsuo Yoshida’s late 1960s animated series, for what it’s worth. Everyone’s pretty much there: Speed Racer, his girlfriend Trixie, his parents Pops and Mom, his older brother Rex, his younger brother Spritle, and the family pet, Chim Chim the chimpanzee (whose presence here does nothing to lift the Monkey Curse of Suck that afflicts movies featuring be-clothèd primates). With the help of Sparky the mechanic, the Racers build and race premium machines in a world where race cars can accelerate up to 800 kilometers an hour and hopscotch over other cars to avoid collisions, often with the help of gee-whiz gadgetry. When Rex gets tarred with scandal and dies in a mountain tunnel during the harrowing Casa Cristo rally, the racing mantle falls to Speed, who emitted motor sounds long before he ever formed his first vowel. Speed shows promise with his tricked-out Mach 5 and is wooed by Royalton Industries, a corporation behind a history of big-business fixes of major competitions. When Speed turns down a sponsorship offer from Royalton, his David must out-drive a slew of champion Goliaths in order to convince the audience that pro racing isn’t just a business—that it has, gosh, real heart.

Attempts to appeal to a general audience are made with a carefully chosen cast: there’s John Goodman as Pops Racer, Susan Sarandon as Mom, Matthew Fox as Racer X (that lantern jaw gives Fox the perfect look for a brooding, cartoon strongman), and Christina Ricci as Trixie. Emile Hirsch—probably most familiar to viewers as Into the Wild’s Chris McCandless—plays Speed, but any performative value he may bring to the screen is rubbed out by frenetic editing, which turns acting into a series of one-expression instants that never require the chops needed to segue that expression into others (yes, Speed Racer is plagued with berserker editing—it’s more mash-up than movie). The Wachowskis even cast a few novelty actors and British badboys: Richard Roundtree shows up as Ben Burns, an aging Grand Prix champ; John Benfield (that fantastic mallet-face best known to North Americans as Kernan in the Prime Suspect series) has a small role as Block, a villain who knows how to use a piranha tank; and Roger Allam, as Royalton, channels Tim Curry with dishy purple verve and almost makes the movie interesting. The adult actors are good to fabulous in their roles; the child actors, on the other hands, deliver the usual child-actor pabulum: chronic stiffness on the part of Nicholas Elia, who plays Speed as a boy, and manic mugging on the part of Paulie Litt, who plays Spritle (his performance is bound to win over old aunties everywhere and it’s one which—since I’m not an old auntie—I never want to re-live).

Pardon the pun, but high-octane doesn’t begin to describe the look and feel of Speed Racer, refurbished by the Wachowskis into a candy-colored blur of fluorescent streaks, quick cuts and booming sounds. The filmmakers’ intention is hard to miss: provide a virtual reality of speed racing onscreen. Special effects have been innovated and technical conventions turned upside-down in this movie. That should have been a good thing. But the Wachowskis let their greenscreen swallow them whole, and their Frankenstein monster of a movie makes monsters out of the faces that swim and blink and veer around onscreen. A cross-country rally race turns into a boggling assault of colour and motion that chases away the tension. I have never felt so bored and numb in the face of so much goddamned fanfare. The Lite-Brite backdrops and acid primaries and pastels ought to marvel, but instead they simply exhaust, and the only thing that weighs down the frantic is an anchor of schmaltz. Parents should know that Speed Racer, while serviceable as a family film and superficially novel, is the cinematic equivalent of a Big Gulp of Jolt and a bag of Fuzzy Peaches; you may as well throw your kids in a lake of Orange Crush and turn a strobe light on them for two hours—they’ll be about as over-stimulated exiting Speed Racer.

It’s a shame. The movie could have been something more. It could have been a satire on the corporate reality of professional sports, but it pussies out and makes grand claims about ideals that, these days, seem hollow. It could have electrified us with its liquid effects, but instead it’s an inert, two-hour exercise of spinning in the same spot. The characterization of the baddies is nothing new, but it’s more classic than clichéd, and the wonderful baddies are assisted by a surreal phalanx of dream-gadgets. It could have been a goddamned ride, but everything drowns in a soup of impressions that never have a chance to impress before flying off the screen. I had flashbacks to Warren Beatty’s Dick Tracy which, for all its look-at-me production design, and for all the waves it made when it came out in 1990, has an empty center and a lame-ass legacy. Take the kids if they’re immune to sensory overload—they’ll probably have a grand time. But all the stunt casting, hip Asian stylings and novelty effects can’t give this thing the edge or texture that geek-happy adults may want to believe this thing possesses. It is what it at first appears to be—a bloated corporate product designed to sell merchandise, and, despite its message, an inadvertent endorsement of the likes of Royalton Industries rather than the Racers themselves.

Ranylt Richildis lives in Ottawa, Canada. She can usually be found sneezing in college libraries or dropping chalk in lecture halls, but she’s somehow managed to squeeze in a film or two a day for the last decade.


Pajiba Love 05/09/08 | He Is Not Human. He Is A Piece of Iron



Comments

I'd love to say I'm surprised... but I'm not. Despite a decent premise and a mostly good cast, the trailers made me want to lie down with an ice pack on my face. I can't imagine sitting through 120 minutes of that.

This is the curse of CGI. There was a time when car movies were cool, mainly because they had actual, real cars. Since the advent of trash like the Fast and the Furious movies, you rarely see any actual racing movies anymore.

Goddamn, I miss Steve McQueen.

Posted by: TK at May 10, 2008 1:30 PM

It wasn't a terrible way to kill two hours. The plot moves at a brisk pace.

The Wachowskis are good at making movies where all you do is sit back and watch the colors. Once I realized that about the Matrix Reloaded and Revolutions, they became more enjoyable than trying to find a deeper meaning.

But I would say wait for it on DVD or if you can spare the expense, the IMAX was a good place to watch it.

Posted by: Jim at May 10, 2008 1:53 PM

Yeah, let's not kid ourselves. We knew this would be a heap of Paris Hilton. My only hope was that it would be either hilarious-horrible or something worth MST3King over.

Posted by: Jamila at May 10, 2008 1:54 PM

I'm gonna stick with my kid brother Erik Henriksen at the Portland Mercury. We generally have the same kind of fun. I'd been a little hesitant so I hope he's not wrong.

any performative value he may bring to the screen is rubbed out by frenetic editing, which turns acting into a series of one-expression instants that never require the chops needed to segue that expression into others

That is the show. I can only hope he gasps and groans as well (and that's always been one of my best impressions). Thanks for the reminder, Jim. I'd forgotten there's an IMAX version. Boy is it annoying to work the weekend. I'd go tonight but there's crucial group Who-ing to do.

Posted by: Jay at May 10, 2008 2:11 PM

How was Christina Ricci in this? I've had a certain fondness for her ever since "The Addam's Family Values," my movie of choice from age seven to twelve. I wouldn't see this even if she is in it, but I would hate for this movie to give people a new chance to make fun of her.

Posted by: Erin at May 10, 2008 2:36 PM

Christina Ricci was in this because she already looks like a Japanese cartoon. No editing or effects needed. I love her to death, but goddamn. That girl is more manga than manga.

And I want a band now just so I can name it Monkey Curse of Suck.

Posted by: Sharon at May 10, 2008 2:55 PM

"Go Speed Racer (Far, Far Away!)"

I recall watching this in the days of my so-callow youth, and I DESPISED IT. It made Beany and Cecil look nuanced.

And now, Sweet Zombie Jesus, they done gone and made this hideous, too-weird abortion of a flick. The Wachowski Bros. after The Matrix, could be given the benefit of a doubt but when they decided to remake this the Brothers W deserve to be stuffed in a bottle, cork firmly in place, and set adrift in the Japanese Current.

Posted by: The Wanderer at May 10, 2008 3:39 PM

I just got back from the film and I really enjoyed it. I've never seen the cartoon, I'm not a racing fan, and I'm a 26 year-old female, so I'm not entirely sure about the toddlers-or-gearheads comment.

I didn't have high expectations, but it delivered exactly what I anticipated, which was two hours of fluff that was really fun to look at. I can't imagine that the original source material boasted much depth and social commentary, so I'm not really sure why anyone would go into this movie anticipating such. I really don't think the film was trying to be anything it wasn't.

Posted by: Roads at May 10, 2008 3:43 PM

I have never felt so bored and numb in the face of so much goddamned fanfare.

Very good review, Ranylt, even if the movie itself is teh suck.

I was convinced from the first time I was assaulted by the trailer that this thing was a turd. It's only Saturday but it looks like, for once, the moviegoing public agrees with me.

I have to share this quote I saw on Rotten Tomatoes: "Imagine if the pod race in Star Wars Episode I was as bad as everyone said it was, and took itself twice as seriously, and went on for more than two hours."

Posted by: Jerce at May 10, 2008 3:48 PM

Despite being a gearhead nut, Mr. Pink makes a yuck face every time he sees ads for Speed Racer. I think he got turned off when he saw the Yokihama tire tie-ins gracing the pages of his car mags.

And I would most certainly not take Little Pink to see this. I don't want to risk sending him into seizure territory. He'd probably be just as happy staying home and watching a monster truck rally.

Laws, the menfolk in my house can be rednecks.

Posted by: Alabamapink at May 10, 2008 3:49 PM

After years of speculation, one of my favorite cartoons as a kid was going to be made into a movie, which I was hoping would be in short a tongue in cheek version of the cartoon, and instead they took the serious approach and made this into Nascar for kids that is seizure inducing. Damn, and I was excited for it.

Posted by: Kamikaze Feminist at May 10, 2008 4:41 PM

I've had a certain fondness for her ever since "The Addam's Family Values," my movie of choice from age seven to twelve.

Same here, Erin. I could quote her lines by heart back then. But, seeing as today is my birthday, I will not be wasting perfectly good drinking dollars on this movie. Instead, I will be putting my money towards the stomach pumping that is bound to happen tonight. As for my birthday wish... it's something along the lines of a steel liver.

Posted by: jM at May 10, 2008 4:43 PM

Kamikaze Feminist - "hope" and "Hollywood" are two things that are basically incompatible.

In fact, hope was your first mistake.

Posted by: I Love Beets at May 10, 2008 4:48 PM

I was excited by the first trailer; it looked like it would be slightly dizzying and fun. As I started to see other versions, though, that changed to "nausea-inducing."

I think I'll pass on this one. Maybe DVD.

Posted by: Mimi at May 10, 2008 5:22 PM

So my adoration for Emile Hirsch aside, I was excited to see this movie, even though it does look kind of lame. I love in the beginning of the trailer where they use the original music. My fondness for Speed is definitely childhood based. In fact, my first actual gift to my father, meaning a gift where I actually purchased it, it wasn't purchased by my mother and then my name was attached, was a Speed Racer tie. And it was awesome. I guess I like kids movies because I can just sit back and take the shit at face value. Plus the fact that the Wachowski Brothers are now a brother and sister amuses and amazes me.

Posted by: Kash at May 10, 2008 5:25 PM

Hate to break it to you Kash, but that "Lana Wachowski" business is bullshit. Much as I hate Fox News, this pretty much clears it up:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,295909,00.html

Posted by: I Love Beets at May 10, 2008 6:15 PM

But, but, but...Speed was my very first crush! I've anticipated this film since I heard about it. I love Emile Hirsh. I'm a 30-something female, not a gear head nor a fan of any type of car racing. Just a Speed Racer fan (still have the shirt and a couple of calendars I can't bear to part with). Thanks for dissing my dude. I'm going anyway though.

Posted by: MissNev at May 10, 2008 6:38 PM

any performative value he may bring to the screen is rubbed out by frenetic editing, which turns acting into a series of one-expression instants that never require the chops needed to segue that expression into others

That is the show. I can only hope he gasps and groans as well (and that's always been one of my best impressions).


Jay, that's the part of the show I was most hoping they'd reproduce - that crazy, hyper-excited monotone (no, really!) that all the characters used in the cartoon. I didn't notice it in the trailers, though, and no way am I paying to see the film.


Parents should know that Speed Racer... is the cinematic equivalent of a Big Gulp of Jolt and a bag of Fuzzy Peaches; you may as well throw your kids in a lake of Orange Crush and turn a strobe light on them for two hours.

Hee! I love that description. Keeping my kids well away from the seizure-inducing entertainment....

Posted by: Edith at May 10, 2008 6:47 PM

As an American I take great umbrage with pajiba at letting a frog review Speed Racer, and to make matters worst pajiba has seen fit to let a skirt spew bile upon one of America's greatest cartoons. Being a former latch- key-kid there were many a day when I would come home from school to an empty apartment because my uncle would be out trying to get food for the little kids to eat and score some smack for him. Speed Racer was like a beacon of light during those troubled times. How does one speak so negatively about Speed or Racer X for that matter? Next thing you know pajibas going to let some spick review Prince Planet, god help us all.

Posted by: Pookie at May 10, 2008 8:36 PM

I was going to ask "Who in fuck liked 'Speed Racer' so much that (s)he has spent the past 20 years just dying to see a 'Speed Racer' movie?" but Kamikaze pretty much took the fun out of it.

I'd also ask "Why the fuck do they keep turning cult cartoons that three people ever saw into big-budget movies?" but since I know the answer -- it's cause 10,000 movies screens can't sit empty -- the fun is pretty much shot out of that one, too.

Sigh.

Posted by: bucdaddy at May 10, 2008 9:11 PM

You know Pookie, your retirement is beginning to resemble Jay-Z's.

Posted by: Sarina at May 10, 2008 9:12 PM

Pookie, you're back! Awesome.

I state the obvious for a reason. It's all I've got.

Posted by: Darcy at May 10, 2008 9:14 PM

cult cartoons that three people ever saw

Now that doesn't apply here.

More people have watched/do watch this cartoon than your precious Cowboy Bebop, you pigs!!


(however, best negative headline I've read--"No, Speed Racer. No."

Posted by: Jay at May 10, 2008 9:25 PM

Coming soon: The Herculoids

Posted by: bucdaddy at May 10, 2008 9:37 PM

I know a ton of people my age who watched the Speed Racer cartoon as kids. However, I'm not sure I could come up with three people who actually liked it. That cartoon was awful. I cannot fathom why anyone thought it would be a good idea to make it into a feature film, live-action or otherwise.

Posted by: Sarina at May 10, 2008 9:39 PM

I have a friend who has been anticipating this to the extent that he has been avoiding everything related to the movie. He doesn't know what he's in for. Oh, just to be there and see his face. (This is the same man who vehemently defends Nic Cage. I've tried to get him to see the light. The only flaw in my arguement is that I love Matchstick Men, a film carried solely by his... I grimace to say... talents.)

Posted by: Tyranthesaurus Rex at May 10, 2008 10:11 PM

i have to learn to stop watching actors i like when they are not actually acting. i love emile hirsch, have ever since 'the dangerous lives of altar boys', but then i saw him on letterman and damn, what an idiot.

Posted by: -b. at May 11, 2008 6:35 AM

More people have watched/do watch this cartoon than your precious Cowboy Bebop, you pigs!!

Aw, man, why did you have to go for the kidney punch, man?

Yeah, I saw it, both the original and the 90's American remake (a-ha, didn't know about that, didja?), and except for the cars, I couldn't stand the damn thing. Luckily for me, I still had Robotech and G-Force. If this show was the main exposure anyone received, no wonder there is so much disdain for anime.

By the way, welcome back Pookie (curses!), and what the hell is "Prince Planet"? Did ted Turner lose his mind again and make another over-the-top environmental cartoon?

Posted by: Vermillion at May 11, 2008 7:35 AM

I had flashbacks to Warren Beatty's Dick Tracy...

Precisely! You'd think they would have learned from Beatty's mistakes. Although, does this movie have famous actors wearing stupid prosthetic faces? If not, then maybe they did learn something...

Posted by: mswas at May 11, 2008 8:33 AM

Considering my expectations for this movie lied somewhere between "The Forbidden Kingdom" and "What Happens in Vegas" I can say I was surprised at how much I ended up liking it.

This is a movie for kids. It's got a candy-coated cast, a marshmallow heart and every scene drips in syrupy-sweet goodness.

So, you might want to get tested for diabetes if you see this movie.

Here's what works: Matthew Fox, whom I've never been a big fan of, nails Racer X. It's like he's having the time of his life. Roger Allam is mustache-twirling evil and you do end up rooting for Speed to wipe that smirk off his face. And the family dynamic between the Racers was engaging.

Hirsch does an adept job as does Ricci, but I had far more fun following their kid counterparts. Sarandon is wasted as Mom and Goodman fares only better as Pops (They're there to deliver one good line or scene and then be background).

If I'm making it sound like I hate this movie, I don't. It's pleasant summer entertainment. The best description I can give you is "Look at the pretty colors. Things go fast. Things go boom. Bad "nonja" joke. Things go faster. What is the monkey's job again?"

Posted by: BFFredo at May 11, 2008 11:28 AM

Watching Speed Racer on the Captain Chesapeake show, in Maryland, in the early 70s, definitely biased me towards seeing this movie. It really is for kids, but I loved it.

Posted by: Adam C at May 11, 2008 3:19 PM

Did this movie really need 135 minutes? Was reading another review and I was startled by the run time. I think I watched the show a little over the years and could see how you can make an OK movie of it - from the commercials it looks visually stunning - but why does in need to be 10 minutes longer than No Country?

Posted by: Brian at May 11, 2008 3:51 PM

everytime i see a trailer for speed racer i want to leap through the tv and strangle it. i don't know why, emile hirsch just has that effect on me. he's so bland. tofu has more flavor than him.

Posted by: citizen_cris at May 11, 2008 6:15 PM

Interesting and I mean that in a "Wow could you be any more of a 'I love to get my shit-encrusted butthole fucked by a huge cock and lick the shit and jizz and butthole juice off the hard cock while it jizzes in my mouth and all over my face' twatsnorggler" way that you manage to play character assassin with Pixar/Disney when they had absolutely nothing to do with this movie in any way, shape or form. But you just had to get in your dig at Disney, no matter that the subject at had has never and will never have any association with the company in any way.

And as for you complaint that the movie didn't make any satirical statement on the corporate reality of professional sports, how much of a galacticlly 'tarded moron are you? This is a no-brains summer blockbuster and to expect or demand it to have some deep social messaged of ANY significance or even insignificance shows what 'tard you truly are.

Posted by: Ben at May 11, 2008 6:20 PM

All I ask is that Hollywood keep their grubby hands off of Thundarr the Barbarian. I do not need to see Vince Vaughn as Mookla.

Posted by: MrC at May 11, 2008 7:15 PM

that patronizing Disney/Pixar humor

Disney yes. Pixar no.

No to the point of laughability.

Posted by: twig at May 11, 2008 7:35 PM

Ranylt, I can't believe Quebec sovereigntism deprived you of Speed Racer. Please tell me you didn't miss out on Wild America and Inspector Gadget too? What about Disney Afternoon? Quelle horreur!

Posted by: Agente Provocatrice at May 11, 2008 8:11 PM

OMG *Sharon* I thought the same thing:

Monkey Curse of Suck would be a great band name.

Where do you live and what instrument do you play?

Posted by: MaryWoo at May 12, 2008 2:03 AM

Speed Racer felt repetitive and its really head inducing. Im really fired up on Indy 4 but the early lackluster reviews worry me. Even The Dark Knight might have trouble beating Iron Man on its entertainment value and box office muscles.
I know Ledger is being glorified because he died but Im not so taken by his past resume and even him as the Joker. It feels and looks nothing new.
And the love interest situation,between Katie and Maggie I can see Bruce going looney over Katie not Maggie.
http://community.livejournal.com/ohnotheydidnt/22180576.html

http://www.wwtdd.com/post.phtml?pk=5273

Posted by: Randy at May 12, 2008 2:53 AM

the only thing i incorrectly predicted about this movie after seeing the first trailer was how many deaths would be attributed to epileptic seizures caused by the frantic lights and editing.

given the wachowski's awful track record it wasn't hard to see this flopping. they've written 15 movies, only 2 turned out good (the matrix, v for vendetta) and directed 8 with only 1 hit (the matrix). they're quickly becoming the farrelly brothers of the action genre if they aren't already there.

Posted by: Stan at May 12, 2008 6:58 AM

Actually Stan, they've only written seven movies, and their additional writing credits are for The Matrix tie-in video games (The Matrix: Path Of Neo, The Matrix Online and Enter The Matrix) and some of the Animatrix segments.

As for the movies they've directed, there have only been five (three of their directing credits on IMDB are, again, for the video games), and Bound did pretty well if I remember rightly.

Sorry for the pedantry...

Posted by: Dill The Devil at May 12, 2008 7:40 AM

Ranylt, I suspect you are much younger than I am, which would explain why you never saw Speed Racer as a child. I did see it, and I didn't get it. It looked weird next to all the other cartoons, and it didn't make sense. Their eyes were too big, the chimp WTF?, the kid brother named Spittle (sic), and the HORRIBLE COMPLETE LACK OF ANIMATION. What was it? One frame per second? And then there was that horrible theme song that you couldn't flush out of your head, except with repeated off-key singings of The Brady Bunch theme song at the top of your lungs. GO SPEED RACER! Blah!

Posted by: BWeaves at May 12, 2008 9:43 AM

I don't think you have to be of a certain age to have seen Speed Racer as a child. I'm only 30 and it aired when I was a kid, and my sister's only 21 and it also aired when she was little.

I also don't think the Speed Racer cartoon sucked because it was anime. It sucked because it was a shitty show. I've got no great love for anime, but Belle and Sebastian had the same annoying animation style and I liked that show. Speed Racer was just plain awful.

Posted by: Sarina at May 12, 2008 10:00 AM

With "Get Smart" coming, I guess the unasked question here is: Is there any TV touchstone that's so obscure and/or so bad that H-wood won't try to turn it into a major movie? When is the garbage dump finally mined out?

Maybe there's a comment diversion in that: They'll have hit rock bottom when they make a movie out of ...

Mr. Peabody and Sherman?

Tom Slick?

Super Chicken?

The Banana Splits?

Lady Elaine Fairchilde?

Posted by: bucdaddy at May 12, 2008 10:47 AM

I never had an opportunity to watch the original Speed Racer, but I was a fan of the early 90's remake. I was an easily impressed pre-teen. To sum up my feelings for this film in a simple simile: it was like riding a carnival centrifuge for 2 hours wearing a collar made of lit sparklers - dynamic, but nauseating.

Posted by: Dan at May 12, 2008 10:50 AM

It's weird. It used to be, if there was a hit movie, they didn't do a sequel, they made a TV show out of it. Now, they take old crappy TV shows and try to make movie franchises out of them. Can I please have something new, and good, please, please, please, for a change? (Yeah, Iron Man is on my to do list.)

Posted by: BWeaves at May 12, 2008 11:49 AM

Again, America said "NO" to "Grindhouse" and everyone's worse off for it.

Posted by: Jay at May 12, 2008 12:44 PM

Good call on the writing and directing credits, I should be more thorough when I'm trying to be an asshole.
As far as Bound doing well, I should have stated that I was basically ignoring everyone else's thoughts and going with my own opinions.... and I didn't like Bound, although Jennifer Tilly was good.

Posted by: Stan at May 12, 2008 1:38 PM

oh and yeah, the wachowskis' suck.

Posted by: Stan at May 12, 2008 1:44 PM

Who else thinks "Ben" is a studio flack posing as a message-boarder, complete with adolescent scatalogical hyperbole, mispellings and a hip contraction of "retard", just like all the kids are doin' these days?

Now that would be a BRILLIANT "satirical statement on the corporate reality".

Posted by: MaryWoo at May 12, 2008 4:05 PM

The more I see of the Wachowski's work, the more The Matrix seems like a lucky shot. At best, they make "not terrible" films that should be soooo much better than they end up. At worst, they make the Matrix 2 and 3

Posted by: Dave S at May 13, 2008 5:01 AM

I'm baffled by the reverence for "The Matrix." The Matrix-produced artificial world looked like a pretty good place to live to me. Why would you want to mess with that?

Posted by: bucdaddy at May 13, 2008 11:09 AM

I'm convinced the first Matrix was a fluke. Ever since, everything the Wachowskis touch turns to shit. I can't even watch the original Matrix anymore, knowing what follows. It makes me sad, angry, and a little constipated.

Posted by: Misanthrope at May 13, 2008 1:13 PM

raw like sushi, haters to the left

I had so much fun at the IMAX tonight that I am now FURIOUS(!!!) at reviews like this.

I'd go on but it'd just be sputtering, incoherent profanity and, you know, I hate to be negative.

(but what the fuck is wrong with these people?)

Posted by: Jay at May 14, 2008 12:45 AM

The Wachowski bros certainly put a lot of effort into making Speed Racer... the movie overall looked and felt like a cross between anime, a kaleidoscope, that Flintstones movie, a video game and the Dukes of Hazard

Posted by: patrick at May 14, 2008 1:08 PM

I freely admit this movie is directly marketed to me - a 40+ obsessive Speed Racer fan who grew up before the higher quality anime was produced. I am also by career an art and creative director, the use of art, design and color for communication is what I research and study every day. I admit I am extremely biased in favor of this movie. The plot and characters are exactly what I wanted, and probably not suited for any other audience.

But those racing sequences across the big screen are like nothing that has ever been seen before... a new style of portraying action that uses the freedom of layered virtuality to the point that the audience is not some passive viewer, but an active participant... A powerful use of palette, pacing and now dimension to control perception and emotion, pushing sensibility to the point they create a real and physical connection with the audience. Even those hating the the film come away admitting the racing sequences were amazing... But this new unique effect - an impossibly deep immersion - diminishes rapidly with the screen size. In IMAX it's an exhilarating experience, but on your TV it's going to be just a car race. Watching it on DVD, or even Blu-Ray you're never going to know what we 40-something rabid fanboys were going on about.

The trailers did NOT represent the film.

Posted by: Scott at May 16, 2008 1:17 PM

Scott, I haven't seen the film but my brother and I are big Speed fans. My brother saw it and he shared your sentiment exactly. I hope the trailers do not represent the film because well, they suck more than Lindsay Lohan does. But seriously, I don't want my little cult cartoons being butchered on the big screen. I'll give it a chance but the trailers were criminal. Filmmakers out there, please leave Jayce and The Wheeled Warriors alone. And while you're being nice, leave Ulysees 31 alone too. My childhood wasn't that happy but the little happy memories I had are crumbling in multiplexes worldwide. Why can't directors just come up with some material of their own to butcher?

Posted by: Chuck Stars at May 17, 2008 6:34 PM

Speed Racer used to be on before Sailor Moon when I was a middle-school tween, and it used to annoy the crap out of me. Me, someone who sat around waiting to watch Sailor Moon, arguably as lame of an anime.

But the boyfriend wanted to see this, and I actually liked it. Except for that fucking monkey and that stupid kid. Spot on with the Monkey Curse of Suck, Ranylt. I hated that monkey so much.

It wasn't sooooo horrible. A little grating, but the driving scenes were exciting because I had no idea what the hell was going on. Pretty shiny lights, oooh. Now, when they make a campy live action version of Sailor Moon, I am SO all over that shit.

Posted by: Gudrun at May 18, 2008 2:46 AM

I went in expecting crap, and i kinda loved it.
going back for the imax ride this weekend to see if it holds up to a second viewing.

Posted by: ms. george at May 29, 2008 2:17 PM

bucdaddy, I'm waiting for "It's the place to be: The Green Acres Movie."

As far as cartoons go, I'm amazed they haven't redone Thundercats.

Posted by: Vee at May 29, 2008 9:28 PM