seeker.jpg

Not Worth Seeking. At All.

The Seeker: The Dark Is Rising / Phillip Stephens

Film Reviews | October 7, 2007 | Comments (51)


Things have been pretty damn good for children’s literature since this Potter fellow started selling billions of books; children’s fantasy, in particular, has undergone a second renaissance since the floodgates reopened. And with the success of The Lord of the Rings disproving both the public’s and critics’ assumptions that fantasy epics cannot, by definition, be mainstream or particularly good (let’s just ignore Dan and Dustin right now), the potential to remake the classics has never been higher — this year alone will see His Dark Materials, The Spiderwick Chronicles, and this week’s The Dark Is Rising.

Susan Cooper’s sequence is, admittedly, next to impossible to adapt faithfully — it’s slow, obtuse, profound, and an Anglophile’s wet dream; each of Cooper’s five books delves into a different guise of British mythology and folklore (from English, Cornish, and Welsh angles). Ultimately, the series deserves treatment by a long BBC miniseries. What it doesn’t deserve is the complete bastardization of The Seeker, a stupid, hollow adventure romp that shares only the name of Cooper’s books and was made by a cast and crew who didn’t give two shits about their source material.

Where to begin? First, screenwriter John Hodge’s decision to make core protagonist Will Stanton (Alexander Ludwig, actually a Canadian) and his family American expatriates in a modern setting is a pointless, arbitrary, and patently commercial change. Hodge claims that changing the character’s nationality was meant to bolster aspects of his alienation, which is horseshit, frankly, since it never occurred to anyone to make him a nationality other than American in this regard. But besides this, there isn’t really any inherent Englishness to the story anyway; Hodge also dumped the elements of folklore, and what we’re left with isn’t much.

Will is the youngest son of the Stanton family, who’ve recently relocated from the States because Pater (John Hickey) got a job as a physics professor in a merry English hamlet (shot in Romania, ha). Will’s going through the rigmarole of adolescent angst: Nobody pays attention to him (which, if you ask me, is mostly because he’s boring), nobody remembers his birthday, and no girl will give him the time of day. Then a local group of codgers led by Merriman Lyon (that formidable cocksucker Ian McShane) tell Will he’s actually a member of a group of immortals destined to defend the forces of Dark from ushering in the apocalypse, so Will had better get his ass in gear and seek out some signs that will prevent the evil Rider (Christopher Eccleston) from going all Book of Revelation. With Cooper’s mythological elements, both involving local folklore and Arthurian legend, excised from the plot, the story’s nothing but a bland Good vs. Evil setup revolving around a few boring set pieces.

And the writing is the least of The Seeker’s problems. Ludwig turns in a performance of emotional range comparable to Jake Lloyd’s cancerous turn as Anakin Skywalker in The Phantom Menace, but no actor really has anything to work with that can really achieve an approximation of depth when Hodge’s story is so lifeless and David Cunningham’s direction and editing are so bad that it’s hard to imagine even the most expectation-less kid getting worked up about it. Fans of Cooper’s books are going to be livid, but even casual moviegoers will balk at having spent their money on this dreck.


Parent: Honey, did you like the movie?
Kid: No, it sucked a turgid cock.
Parent: Oh, well, I heard that it was based on some cool books. Why don’t we go to the public library and see if we can find them?
Kid: That would be the tits.

And that’s the best possible exchange we can hope for — that The Seeker’s lack of imagination won’t crush anyone else’s, because it can be found elsewhere….

Phillip Stephens is the lead critic for Pajiba. He lives in Fayetteville, AR.


Heartbreak Kid, The | Road, The by Cormac McCarthy





Comments

Yeah, I could tell from the trailer that this movie was going be complete arse-gravy.

Posted by: Vi at October 7, 2007 3:38 AM

No. No no no. I had (and have) absolutely no interest in seeing this movie, but really? Christopher Eccleston? Why is he involving himself with this dreck?

Posted by: McGeek at October 7, 2007 3:44 AM

McGeek, you echo my thoughts precisely. He's so much better than this.

Posted by: the hel at October 7, 2007 5:10 AM

Oh gawd - I saw the title and hoped against hope that this vacuous drivel wasn't the adaptation of Cooper's work. To reduce that seriously deep (some would say glacially slow) sourse material to this Potter-lite twaddle is a crime.

Why can't they make a decent fantasy novel/movie adaptation ?

Posted by: Doctor Nick at October 7, 2007 5:13 AM

Oh gawd - I saw the title and hoped against hope that this vacuous drivel wasn't the adaptation of Cooper's work. To reduce that seriously deep (some would say glacially slow) sourse material to this Potter-lite twaddle is a crime.

Why can't they make a decent fantasy novel/movie adaptation ?

Posted by: Doctor Nick at October 7, 2007 5:13 AM

I'm actually quite tired of the constant barrage of fantasy epics and movies where kids discover "a whole new world full of magic" and so on, et cetera. It's not that I'm an unimaginative twit, because they can be done well, and I do enjoy them when they are...but it just seems like they so RARELY are.

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at October 7, 2007 5:46 AM

Here's an idea. How about making a fantasy movie in which the protagonist isn't some "chosen one" with unique powers meant to fulfill some prophecy?

Posted by: Darth Corleon at October 7, 2007 6:18 AM

Well, they ask Christopher Eccleston why he was in this movie in this interview. His answer says it all...


http://www.scifi.com/sfw/interviews/sfw17063.html

Posted by: laurence at October 7, 2007 7:29 AM

You mean like Stardust? Which I enjoyed by the way. Well, I really can't wait for Hollywood to discover Terry Pratchett. Hmm...that came out wrong. I can wait. Indefinitely.

Posted by: joker at October 7, 2007 7:44 AM

I saw the trailor for this movie while standing in line to see Waitress. And I almost had an anneurism. I also remember thinking that of all the books I read as a child The Dark is Rising is one of the few that would suck as a movie because it couldn't (shouldn't) be done. Now, if they do Invitation to the Game I might consider it.

Or be equally horrified.

Posted by: Scarlett at October 7, 2007 7:48 AM

I'm gonna slam this piece of shit based solely on the high douche factor transmitted by that smarmy little shit they're trying to ram down our throats.

The clips just scream: "here's your next teen heartthrob isn't he just dreeeeeeeeeamy."

fuck that

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 7, 2007 10:16 AM

joker: I'd like to see Christopher Nolan direct an adaptation of Pratchett's Night Watch (with Christian Bale playing Vimes, naturally) - that could just be me, though. I'd watch Bale floss his teeth if Nolan were pointing the camera at him.

Posted by: dillthedevil at October 7, 2007 11:02 AM

Well, after seeing that trailer, it looks like I can say adieu to another good part of my childhood.

Look, if they had just made a bland, Harry Potter-lite flick, I would've simply been disappointed. But now they had to turn half of the story into an after-school teen drama special as well? Why would they do this?

Then again, if that pile of shit Eragon (a watered-down version of an already mediocre story) can drum up almost $75 million in box office sales, I suppose that I should've seen this coming.

Posted by: MrSparkle at October 7, 2007 11:20 AM

Invitation to the Game? God, I read that in fifth grade, and even though I liked it, I never thought it was a very popular title. Did that turn into a cult hit while I was pubertizing?

Posted by: Revert at October 7, 2007 12:50 PM

I am impressed that you're the first reviewer I've read who is actually familiar with Susan Cooper's books. At least enough to NOT claim that since the movie sucked, Susan Cooper must just be another hack trying to latch onto J.K. Rowling's success. I have a feeling most of those other reviewers are ones who haven't read any of the Harry Potter books, as well.



That being said, my friend still doesn't get why I started throwing things at the screen during the trailer when we saw Stardust.



Oh, and Kevin, I'm sure there's adolescent fantasy out there where some nobody tween dosen't discover they're the lost Princess of Xenu and the only one who can avert the coming Apocalypse by using the Porpentine, but frankly, they're written for kids. Most often, kids who feel left out of little league and being pretty and popular. So, it's not a big stretch to think that we all were hoping that someone would appear and say that WE were the chosen one and had to save everything and be special.

Posted by: Rowen at October 7, 2007 1:17 PM

This was my FAVORITE series of books as a young person, and when I heard it was coming out, I was cautiously excited....but no more. The trailer sucked all the joy out of it for me, and your review has just underscored my desire to skip the movie altogether.

Thank you for suffering so that I did not have to.

Posted by: Dana at October 7, 2007 1:37 PM

"I am impressed that you're the first reviewer I've read who is actually familiar with Susan Cooper's books. At least enough to NOT claim that since the movie sucked, Susan Cooper must just be another hack trying to latch onto J.K. Rowling's success. I have a feeling most of those other reviewers are ones who haven't read any of the Harry Potter books, as well."

Yeah--my hometown newspaper's review kept comparing this to Harry Potter, and the critic in the New York Times kept saying: "Where have we seen this before?" about all the "chosen one" plot points...I haven't read the original books, but I know enough to know that Susan Cooper was writing fantasy long before JK Rowling was.

Posted by: Genevieve at October 7, 2007 1:40 PM

Well, shit.

Yeah, I read this book in a children's literature class in library school and was very, very impressed. Having just read the new "Order of the Phoenix" I loved how it was even *more* paranoid and "oh man, we're fucked!!" Thus, as with some others, I thought "Dark is Rising? Eccleston as the Rider? Oh, cool!!"....but then....details started emerging....

I've been pimping this book for a few years now, so I do hope some kids will visit my library as suggested and get the good stuff.

Posted by: Jay at October 7, 2007 1:51 PM

Christopher Eccleston was in Gone in Sixty Seconds, for fuck's sake. So I'm not sure where "he's better than this" is coming from. He's fine as an actor and all, but he's not exactly discerning when it comes to picking movie roles.

Posted by: Daphne Wilson at October 7, 2007 2:54 PM

Why is Eccleston in it?

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$, that's why. He's a working actor. He can't be terribly precious about turning down a job. Besides, maybe he thought there was a chance it would be good.

I hate, hate, hate everyone involved with this shameful travesty. This series of books is one of the best I've ever read. It does deserve the deep miniseries treatment.

At least they haven't butchered The Chronicles of Prydain... yet!

Posted by: alone in the dark at October 7, 2007 3:01 PM

Christopher Eccleston, fine term as Doctor Who, but hmmmmmm, read on more than on place that he was a real bitch about not being typecast or some bullshit of that sort. And now, he pulls this.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 7, 2007 3:13 PM

[b]a local group of codgers led by Merriman Lyon (that formidable cocksucker Ian McShane)[/b] what is this about? why the hate for Lovejoy?

and is the preview feature on these posts terrible or is it just me? It just shows me the html code instead of what it will look like after being posted.

Posted by: EricD at October 7, 2007 3:52 PM

well nm then. the preview showed me exactly the same thing that appeared after posting.

Posted by: EricD at October 7, 2007 3:54 PM

EricD

Use > instead of [] for your tags.

And the McShane references is Deadwood.

Posted by: alone in the dark at October 7, 2007 3:56 PM

This is horrifying. I base my disdain of Harry Potter on the knowledge that there are better children's fantasy series out there (eg: The Dark is Rising), but no one will pick up the books if this movie is all they see.

Posted by: Starbuck at October 7, 2007 4:00 PM

thank you alone in the dark
don't know how i screwed that up.

I never watched Deadwood but was thinking of checking out the first season. Is it commonly accepted that McShane does a terrible job in that series?

Posted by: EricD at October 7, 2007 4:56 PM

EricD,

No, no, a thousand times no. McShane's performance in Deadwood is a modern classic. He just uses the word "cocksucker" about fifty times... a sentence.

Posted by: alone in the dark at October 7, 2007 5:16 PM

Gen, Susan Cooper won Newberry honors for this series back in the 70s. What people don't really realize is that J.K. Rowling, as good as she is, wouldn't be anywhere without authors like Cooper, Le Guin, L'Engle, etc doing this stuff, and doing it well, long before she thought it up. She's standing on the shoulders of greats.


Alone, you obviously don't remember The Black Cauldron. Disney has spent the last 20 years trying to forget they made that movie.

Posted by: Rowen at October 7, 2007 7:24 PM

alone, thx for the info. i've added Deadwood to my get list

Posted by: EricD at October 7, 2007 7:36 PM

dillthedevil: While the thought of a movie adaptation of Night Watch makes me tingle in special places, I can only think that it would be fucked up no matter who they got to direct/act in it. Also, while Christian Bale is le awesome, I don't see him as Vimes. Too young. And, unfortunately, not dorky enough to play Past!Vimes. Maybe Ned Coates, however. My point being, I love that book with a fierceness and would need any movie of it to be simply amazing, capturing both the humour and the pathos, where it can make me giggle and sniffle at the same time.

As for the movie being reviewed, didn't even know it existed, don't plan on seeing it. Only read 'Dark Is Rising' and 'The Grey King' (I think?) and that was a long time ago. I have no idea if I even still own the books. However,

Parent: Honey, did you like the movie?
Kid: No, it sucked a turgid cock.
Parent: Oh, well, I heard that it was based on some cool books. Why don't we go to the public library and see if we can find them?
Kid: That would be the tits.

is the win.

Posted by: 'Cuno at October 7, 2007 7:48 PM

"The Dark is Rising" without the mythology, eh? Will their next film be a remake of "Lawrence of Arabia" without all the pesky war in it?

I hate myself for wanting to see this. I know that it will make my brain hurt and that by the time the end credits roll I will be gnawing on the arm of my chair in impotent rage.

Posted by: looneymoth at October 7, 2007 8:58 PM

Rowen,

I had forgotten it! Thank you very much! Aaaaaaaaaaaaaggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhh!

As far as Rowling goes, every generation thinks that they've discovered the best real deal. L'Engle and Andre Norton and LeGuin stand on the shoulders of Robert Louis Stevenson, Wilkie Collins,and Edgar Rice Burroughs. It's a continuum. I don't begrudge Rowling a thing; I think she did a fantastic job with the Potter books. Maybe we should be putting some of the great books of the past in the hands of today's kids; then again, maybe they're just waiting to discover the next great author.

Movies like this won't help, though.

Posted by: alone in the dark at October 7, 2007 9:11 PM

I always thought Reaper Man, Mort, and Guards, Guards! would make great movies. So many possibilities with Pratchett. How about Nathan Fillion as Vimes? Casting the wizards would be a hoot. Of course everyone would think it was derivative of Rowlings. . . that so pisses me off.

Posted by: tired one at October 7, 2007 9:57 PM

Ooh, Alone in the Dark, you could have kept going back...Dunsany is my favorite, even if I can't afford half his writings.

Posted by: Phaeolus at October 8, 2007 12:34 AM

Rowen>> I understand the escapist impulse that whole "chosen one" storyline is fulfilling. I just think it might be nice for a change to create a fantasy story that empowers those kids with the idea that they can achieve greatness without being the second coming, because none of them actually are.

Posted by: Darth Corleone at October 8, 2007 3:45 AM

I am a huge fan of the books, and I sure cannot imagine how on earth they could intelligently be translated to the silver screen.
This is bastardization at its lowest. I shall be avoiding this motion picture.

Posted by: Catherine at October 8, 2007 9:30 AM

Actually Darth Corleone, China Mieville did just that with Un Lun Dun. The "Chosen One" gets knocked out of the story pretty early, and her normal best friend ends up saving the world. It's a pretty entertaining little book.

Posted by: Taffer at October 8, 2007 9:46 AM

Hmmm...not surprising that this sucked, I'm afraid. When adaptations remove all the intelligence and "hard bits" out of fantastic children's literature, all you're left with is the wrapping paper and no gift.

It was different with "Eragon" because there was no intelligence in there to begin with. The movie is utterly hilarious in a MST3K kind of way, though.

"Spiderwick Chronicles" might turn out to be good because it's such a lightweight source...it's written for a younger audience than "The Dark Is Rising" or anything comparable. There's nothing challenging to destroy.

I still retain hope for "The Golden Compass", which is the only one of Pullman's books that has enough action to make a decent movie.

Posted by: Wednesday at October 8, 2007 10:18 AM

I am a bit ashamed to say that I have actually seen this movie. I knew it was going to be bad from reading the reviews and seeing the trailer, but something in me just had to see it for myself. I did think Eccleston did well as the rider, and actor who played will was good too, but the story itself . . . was it even a story? They pretty much mangled Cooper's wonderful tale.

On a side note, I'd never thought of Cooper's books as being obtuse or slow (and I hate slow books), so I was surprised when so many people commented on that. I guess when you like a book, you can just race through it!

Posted by: Meagan at October 8, 2007 11:19 AM

My daughter wanted to see this, but I was putting her off, mostly because I didn't like the book. I know, I know, but god it was DULL, and all I could think of were the half dozen better fantasy series I could have been reading. Maybe I can just keep hemming and hawing until it slips out of theaters.

Posted by: pinkcheese at October 8, 2007 11:28 AM

"At least they haven't butchered The Chronicles of Prydain... yet!"

Other people have beaten me to this, but just let me say that I still haven't forgiven Disney for this. And apparently they're just trying to pretend it never happened.

I loved the Cooper books as a child, but not equally. I'm still not crazy about Over Sea, Under Stone, but Greenwitch has grown on me over the years (hmm, that statement is a little scary, now that I look at it). Even so, I never found them obtuse. But The Dark is Rising, The Grey King and Silver On the Tree have been winners since I found them as a child.

This movie just makes me want to hit someone. The changes are pointless, and the studio can't even get a good preview out of the film. Here's hoping for a remake in 10 years.

Posted by: Kate at October 8, 2007 12:04 PM

I'll be the 'n'th person to say it: the books were amazing. And since there're a lot of Post-Potter kids looking around for something to read, just like the Grateful Dead fans who had nothing to do with their lives once Jerry Garcia died and stared following Phish merely as a substitute, I've been suggesting the Dark Is Rising sequence for a while too. It could be their "Phish", children's literature-wise of course. Baby steps... baby steps...

Posted by: Indiebass at October 8, 2007 12:46 PM

I am told that my sister-in-law, who loved - and still loves - the book, was weeping scalding tears of anger and betrayal when she saw the trailer. Guess no-one can rape your childhood like Tinseltown.

Spot-on review. Keep walking past the cinema kids, the library isn't far.

Darth Corleon>> Blame Joseph goddamn Campbell.

Posted by: Toilet_Trader at October 8, 2007 1:31 PM

Taffer>> I'm aware it's been done in fantasy literature. It just seems to be a rarity in which adaptations producers choose for the cinema. Thanks for the recommendation, though. I had not heard of that one. :- )

Posted by: Darth Corleone at October 8, 2007 2:39 PM

Taffer>> I'm aware it's been done in fantasy literature. It just seems to be a rarity in which adaptations producers choose for the cinema. Thanks for the recommendation, though. I had not heard of that one. :- )

Posted by: Darth Corleone at October 8, 2007 2:40 PM

I always thought Reaper Man, Mort, and Guards, Guards! would make great movies. So many possibilities with Pratchett. How about Nathan Fillion as Vimes? Casting the wizards would be a hoot. Of course everyone would think it was derivative of Rowlings


How would anyone imagine TP to be a derivative of Rowlings? His heroes aren't...heroes, they just get things done, preferably without getting themselves killed. Fillion as Vimes? too young. I just hope they stay the hell away from the Discworld otherwise I'll cut a bitch.

Posted by: joker at October 8, 2007 5:11 PM

I went and saw this movie last night. It was one of the worst movies i've ever seen, but despite this (and mostly due to an otherwise empty theater), i thoroughly enjoyed myself. Word of advice: if you must go and see this movie, the only way you're going to enjoy it is if you make fun of it constantly or otherwise ignore it while it's playing.

Posted by: Chugga at October 8, 2007 10:54 PM

I'm a long time lurker who has never posted before, but, man, may I say something now? Thank you, damn it. I am so, so tired of people blaming Cooper for a boring book to turn into a boring film, and all the rest. Damn it, I feel really sorry for her right now. These books WERE my childhood. Long after I put away most of my childhood favourites, and stored them in boxes, this series still sits on my shelf. And it will stay there.

Posted by: Louise at October 9, 2007 6:59 AM

My sister and I love these books, and consider them neither boring nor slow. When the preview came on in the theatre, we immediately burst into simultaneous shrieks of rage. The men couldn't understand why we were rocking catatonically for several minutes afterwards. Why why why?

Posted by: hilaryous at October 9, 2007 8:25 PM

Sad, sad sad about this - I was concerned when I saw the trailer but was remaining cautiously optimistic in the hope it would be like Bridge to Terabithia, i.e. nothing at all like the trailer. (Plus, the moment in the trailer when the Black Rider pulls up next to Will - goosebumps all over my body.) And then I heard an interview with Susan Cooper in which she was not at all pleased with the adaptation. And this review confirms my worst fears. I shall cuddle up with the books and some hot cider this weekend and pretend that the movie doesn't exist.

Hey, did anyone else really want to learn Welsh after reading The Grey King? I still borrow the line about Welsh babies dribbling a lot.

Posted by: alanna at October 9, 2007 9:19 PM

I'm holding out hope that the next big kid's film (after The Golden Compass) will be an adaptation of Redwall directed by Mel Gibson.

You know it could happen. Total slaughter porn that takes place in an Abbey. It would be perfect for Mel.

Posted by: imk at October 10, 2007 1:19 PM





Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.