free counter with statistics Secret Life Of Bees, The | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

beessecret1sm.jpg

Racism, Redemption, & the Dignified Death Grip of Latifah

The Secret Life of Bees / Agent Bedhead

Film Reviews | October 22, 2008 | Comments (35)


When it comes to film reviews, my particular “gift” is trashing the presumably shittier side of cinema. So, I am, clearly, out of my element in reviewing a film that very well might present itself for some consideration during awards season. Still, a bit of variation never hurt anyone, so long as I exercise due care to avoid the pitfall of those previously exercised bee-related puns, for which I proffer a much-belated apology. While a few such metaphors for bees are, indeed, unearthed by The Secret Life of Bees, we won’t speak of them here except to say that, apparently, bees are much like people. Also, while the film’s title can be taken quite literally, the film itself details a manner of living that is quite foreign, if not altogether “secret,” to today’s theaters. For once, African-American women appear within a film as something other than the following stereotypes: (1) Lazy, demanding, money-grubbing sperm receptacles; or (2) Career-driven bitches who, through their own selfish successes, emasculate their husbands, leaving them with no other recourse but stick their dicks into other women. These stereotypes, of course, aren’t specific to race, and The Secret Life of Bees reflects aspects of women that show that, while not superior to men, these females demonstrate the strength, compassion, and lust for life that not only is necessary for survival of the colony but also to society at large. In other words, Tyler Perry, you can just go suck on your misogynistic bag of dicks.

The Secret Life of Bees certainly isn’t for everyone. In fact, this film will likely fare much better as a matinee (or even a DVD rental) than date-night material, that is, unless any dudes out there are interested in getting slightly misty-eyed in the theater. Director and screen writer Gina Prince-Bythewood (Love & Basketball) has adapted Sue Monk Kidd’s novel into a celluloid tale that can best be described as a fish-out-of-water, coming-of-age tale set in some extremely difficult circumstances. The story tackles some pretty heavy subject matter, from racial tension and violence all the way to death, suicide, and child abuse. Unexpectedly, however, Prince-Bythewood keeps the tone as light as possible and has crafted, along with some extremely gifted actresses, an uplifting tale of sorts. As a whole and despite a fair amount of sentimentality, The Secret Life of Bees strikes a fair balance between drama and schmaltz, which is no easy feat to accomplish when dealing with rather some uncomfortable subject matter. After all, the deep South wasn’t an easy place for blacks in the period immediately following the mid-1960s Civil Rights Act.

The film opens both with a whimper and a bang, as we see a young girl hiding in a closet while her parents are fighting. In the physical struggle, a gun falls onto the floor, and the little girl’s hand reaches towards the pistol. Then, we hear 14-year old Lily Owens (Dakota Fanning) tell us that, at the age of four, she accidentally shot and killed her own mother (Hilarie Burton). As if the resultant overwhelming guilt wasn’t enough of a burden, Lily has been raised by a father (Paul Bettany) who despises her and regularly makes Lily kneel upon uncooked grits until her knees bleed. In her misery, Lily grows up obsessed with the mother that she barely remembers and only knows through a box of belongings that she keeps buried in the backyard. All is not completely lost, however, for Lily receives some care and nurturing from their housekeeper, Rosaleen (Jennifer Hudson).

Immediately after the Civil Rights Act has been signed into law, Rosaleen attempts to register to vote, is confronted by a group of white men, who smack her around, and when Rosaleen dares to get a bit “uppity,” she ends up in jail. With Lily’s help, Rosaleen escapes, and, facing equally hopeless situations, the two decide to hit the road and find a better life. Lily, guided only by a scrawling on one of her mother’s keepsakes decides to head towards the nearby town of Tiburon, South Caronlina. She and Rosaleen find refuge at a honey farm owned by August Boatwright (Queen Latifah), who allows them to earn their room and board by working the beehives. August’s sisters, the compassionate and sensitive May (Sophie Okonedo) and the lively and musical June (Alicia Keyes), also live at the farm. As the story explains, there once was also a sister named April (twin to May), but she went the way of those disappearing showers, and, somehow, their parents skipped the month of July. While the somewhat clichéd names of the sisters might lead to an assumption that they are typically one-dimensional cinematic characters, this is not the case. Instead, the seasonal breadth of the Boatwrights comes off as hauntingly poetic, if not altogether breathtakingly beautiful when reflecting the scope of their characters. Through a dignified and inspiring sense of self-reliance, August shows Lily the ropes of beekeeping and inspires the young girl as well as providing Lily with a warmth that she’s never before known.

Although all of the major characters of The Secret Life of Bees do happen to be women, some males do appear in some auxillary roles to illustrate their impact on the characters’ lives. However, the focus remains on Lily and the Boatwright sisters, and each of these actresses gives a magnificent performance. Dakota Fanning, having redeemed herself from that child-rape atrocity known as Hounddog, makes the transition from a plucky and somewhat annoying child star to an emotionally-developed young actress on the verge of a long-lived career. Her portrayal of a character that has never known love — “I can’t think of something I’d rather have more than someone lovin’ me” — is both heartbreaking and heartening. Queen Latifah is convincing as a beacon of strength and kindness in her role; Alicia Keyes positively glows and demonstrates that her acting talent rivals her already-proven musical abilities; and Sophie Okonedo is transcendent while portraying her character’s emotional translucence.

The Secret Life of Bees is as much about redemption and a young girl’s search for love as it is about racism. Prince-Bythewood somehow manages to skillfully highlight the issues of race and violence but doesn’t dwell upon them. Instead, these issues develop valuable character-related context and provide a framing device for Lily’s physical and emotional journeys. In the end and despite the odds, Lily and the audience both find love and a sense of family in the oddest of places.

Agent Bedhead (a.k.a. “Kimberly”) lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She can be found at agentbedhead.com.


Pajiba Love 10/22/08 | Panty Removers



Comments

Wait a minute, I thought this review was going to trash the movie for having as its centerpoint a group of magical, mystical black people who redeem an angelic white girl! What the....?

Posted by: samantha t at October 22, 2008 1:13 PM

Yeah, I feel cheated! This is no way to start a race war... Jesus, Kimberly! You should know better!

Posted by: Skitz at October 22, 2008 1:17 PM

Maybe this is just a difference of perspective, but in serious cinema my perception is that women, and perhaps particularly African-American women, are almost exclusively portrayed as strong and compassionnate with a strong lust for life.

Posted by: Eep at October 22, 2008 1:25 PM

What a nice surprise! From the weird trailers, I was expecting the worst and had no plans to check it out. (the trailer gave no indication what it was about! which usually signifies a crap plot.)

I have to admit, I've always liked Queen Latifah, even if I haven't watched some of the more horrible movies she's been cast in.

Posted by: staylor at October 22, 2008 1:49 PM

I'm glad this got a good review, I remember enjoying the book a lot.

Eep you and I are not watching the same cinema. Tell me the movies were the women are as you describe, so I can go out and buy them all and have them on constant rotation.

Posted by: Stella at October 22, 2008 1:49 PM

"WHERE" not 'were' doh!

Posted by: Stella at October 22, 2008 1:51 PM

But are the bees racist at least?

Posted by: Great Mango at October 22, 2008 1:59 PM

Yeah, is that the secret of the bees? That they're racist prick bees? Does Latifah even rap in this? Sing? Nothing? Is anybody in a fat suit? Explosions? Kathy Bates?

...fucking cinema nowadays...

Posted by: Skitz at October 22, 2008 2:04 PM

My recall doesn't really work that way, so I turned to google and it gave me this list, the ones of which I've seen I agree with:

http://ezinearticles.com/?100-Strong-Women-Movies&id=1080174

I mean seriously, I think this would be faster if we tried to think of (again serious) movies in which there weren't any strong women with compassion and/or a lust for life. Except that none spring to mind. Well, except maybe for In the Company of Men, but it was part of the premise of that movie that the woman they selected was vulnerable, and really she still had a dignity to her.

Posted by: Eep at October 22, 2008 2:08 PM

"strength,compassion, and lust for life"
"emotional journey"

Are you sure this review isn't a joke?

Posted by: Lilly at October 22, 2008 2:13 PM

". . .apparently, bees are much like people."

The women do all the work and the men are drones who do nothing? Oh, yeah, I guess that is what this movie is about.

Posted by: BWeaves at October 22, 2008 2:23 PM

I wouldn't watch this if it were water and my balls were on fire, but HEY KIMBERLY! Did you see the shout-out to you from John Malkovich in the November Esquire, the one with smokin' Halle Berry on the cover?

From "What I've learned":

"Twenty-five or thirty years ago, you became famous, what's the worst that could happen to you? Page 6? Cindy Adams? Liz Smith? There weren't cell phones with cameras. Waiters didn't listen to your conversations and send them to Drudge or Defamer or Gawker or Jezebel or AGENT BEDHEAD. Now we're all Japanese. We're a nation of paparazzi. And it's okay. You make your peace with it. We get so many rewards, we're much more remunerated than other people, so I guess we should take more licks than other people, too."

Are you messing with me? Malkovich, Malkovich, Malkovich? - AB

Posted by: bucdaddy at October 22, 2008 2:45 PM

Hi my name is Sophie Okonedo and I am one of the greatest actresses on the planet.

Can we put her in everything? Please?

Posted by: twig at October 22, 2008 2:57 PM

what I liked the most about that link, Eep was the author's story.

Posted by: Stella at October 22, 2008 2:59 PM

My mother gave me this book to read a few years ago, and I absolutely loved it.

I hope it's still playing the weekend I'm home, so that she and I can see it together-- it sounds like it managed to avoid the major suckage it was in danger of, what with the casting and really sensitive subject material.

Also, WTF Paul Bettany? I will see ANYTHING for that man.

Posted by: That Girl at October 22, 2008 3:23 PM

Indeed... would make a great movie :-)

And hey, I just want to be clear that I love to see strong characters of any kind in movies (and weak ones. Really any interesting and well-drawn character), I just feel like every time a movie like this one comes out, I hear about how finally there is a movie with a strong female character... and I feel like there are tons of them. I don't know if it's that people don't pick up on it, or that the pattern of sexism is so ingrained in our social psyche that we're constantly surprised when it doesn't rear its head. Or as I said, maybe it's just the movies I happen to see.

Oh, American Psycho would be another one that didn't have strong female characters, but again I think that's kind of the point since we're seeing the story from Bateman's viewpoint. I mean the movie was directed by a woman and screenwritten by her and a lesbian (an awesome one; Guinevere Turner), so I'm guessing that the intention was not to denigrate women.

Posted by: Eep at October 22, 2008 3:25 PM

Glory be, that show was nice of those blacks to help that angelic white girl reconcile her past all the while fighting for the fucking right to be treated fairly.

Posted by: Pookie at October 22, 2008 4:04 PM

I was very fond of "Love & Basketball" and will be interested to see this one, when it comes up on the Netflix queue. Thanks for the review.

Posted by: zh at October 22, 2008 4:38 PM

I read this book a few years ago and really liked it. I was afraid the movie would mishandle the material. Now I will have to overcome my aversion to Dakota Fanning and see this. Do you swear she's not annoying in this film?

Posted by: rlr260 at October 22, 2008 4:41 PM

I'm with That Girl. Good movie or not, if Paul Bettany's in it, I'm there! The fact that I might even enjoy this film is simply a side bonus.

Posted by: JK at October 22, 2008 4:42 PM

AB, Serious as a heart attack.

Posted by: bucdaddy at October 22, 2008 6:12 PM

Maybe this is just a difference of perspective, but in serious cinema my perception is that women, and perhaps particularly African-American women, are almost exclusively portrayed as strong and compassionnate with a strong lust for life.

Well, there's yer problem. SERIOUS cinema. And I am sure you will agree, there is little in cinema that one can take seriously. You either have a strong bullshit meter or lucked out. Either way, good on ya.

Still, Bedhead getting referenced by John Malkovich Malkovich Malkovich? Coolest. Shit. Ever.

Posted by: Vermillion at October 22, 2008 6:31 PM

Agreed on the coolest shit ever.

I'm willing to accept that I might have just seen and heard of a coincidentally pro-female collection, but if the preponderance of movies portray their female characters as fluffy weak eye candy, to the point that it's a pleasant surprise when one doesn't, then what are some names of the movies that do so? And serious is a relative term; if you look at the list on the link I posted, you can see that you can get into some fairly bargain-basement action dreck and still have a positive portrayal of some or all of the female characters. I would be impressed if someone could come up with more than a handful of A movies from the past several decades with a negative view of women.

Posted by: Eep at October 22, 2008 6:56 PM

I would be impressed if someone could come up with more than a handful of A movies from the past several decades with a negative view of women.

Okay, I like a challenge:

Nearly every horror movie ever made ("nearly" leaves out stuff like The Descent and Alien).

The Tyler Perry oevre (as mentioned in the review).

Just about any "romantic comedy" or "chick flick" where the main character is browbeaten by "fate" to fall for a certain man, with no real reason as that he is less of an asshole than whoever she dated before.

The Haggis Movie (we all know which one).

Just about all of the grossout and bawdy comedies (this includes classics like Animal House all the way up to whatever iteration of American Pie is on video now).

Pretty much every gangster/criminal movie (especially if it involves a popular rapper, but then again, there is Set It Off which also had Queen Latifah, and I thought those women were pretty damn strong).

Honestly, listing them all out would be an exercise in futility.

As for the list, I can't really argue with it, but still, only 100? Across the whole of cinema? And a good chunk of which are foreign films and, as you said, bargain-basement movies? Are you really that surprised that folks are still a little wanting in the "strong female portrayal in films" department, especially when it comes to A-list movies?

I gotta say again, you were either extremely lucky or have a great bullshit meter.

Posted by: Vermillion at October 22, 2008 7:25 PM

For once, African-American women appear within a film as something other than the following stereotypes: (1) Lazy, demanding, money-grubbing sperm receptacles; or (2) Career-driven bitches who, through their own selfish successes, emasculate their husbands, leaving them with no other recourse but stick their dicks into other women

soooo, they are just like white women

Posted by: anon at October 22, 2008 8:35 PM

Most of those bawdy comedies are B movies, not A movies. Animal House is going pretty far back, but probably counts. American Pie... mmmmmmmmaybe, although I would argue that the guys in the movie are idiots and the women are smarter and have far more dignity than the guys.

The list was one person's list of 100 movies that have strong women. I can list plenty more myself. My point was that I presented a list of 100 and added some myself, and could add plenty more, and yet everyone seemed/seems to think that movies like that are rare without even offering a counter example.

In the Haggis movie at least one woman is portrayed as weak, but others are portrayed as strong (unless I've completely forgotten it). Hence they are weak women, not weak because they are women.

Horror movies are also mostly B movies, but even within the genre there are strong women who may seem vulnerable at first but end up using intelligence and toughness to survive (Scream, Red Eye, etc).

I'm not sure I can accept entire genres anyway. After all my point is that everyone has the idea in their head that movies in general are unkind to women, but that if you actually look at it movie by movie it's really not the case. Picking a genre and saying, "Well, but everybody knows that those movies don't respect women," is doing exactly what I was talking about. So far you've given me two movies against my 100+ as evidence that most movies don't portray women as strong. If that convinces you, that's great, but I think it's at least worth considering whether you're just assuming something to be true despite a great deal of evidence to the contrary.

Posted by: Eep at October 22, 2008 9:15 PM

This sounds like the kind of "chick flick" I can deal with.

As long as there is no female protagonist desperate to have a man/baby/beauty pageant sash, I think I can get behind this one.

Posted by: greer at October 22, 2008 9:18 PM

American Pie... mmmmmmmmaybe, although I would argue that the guys in the movie are idiots and the women are smarter and have far more dignity than the guys.

Really? More dignity? One is designed from the get-go a sexual trophy (a constantly naked, sexually curious, stunningly gorgeous woman of indeterminate accent and willing to sleep with a guy just for inviting her over?); another is classed as a prude who (for some reason) has to be deflowered; the one adult woman feels it necessary to sleep with an underage teen boy. Even the most personable female has to have a fetishistic attachment to her flute. Any other female character is barely glossed over. Just because they don't get involved in dick and fart jokes doesn't mean they are being dignified or respected. They are stand-ins for adolescent fantasies instead of actual human beings.

Maybe that is the question I should ask you is by what do you mean respect for women? Does the woman have to have a cool line or two? Does she have a fully-developed characterization? Or can she just not get knocked around by males? It seems you have a different criteria for movies than I. I know I consider a film respectful to women when it doesn't treat either the female characters or the female audience like idiots, for starters.

And how are you classifying what differentiates an 'A' movie from a 'B' movie? I know I am going by popularity, and those movies are a hell of a lot more well-known than (sadly) Miyazaki and others on that list. And if you mean quality, well, that is a bit unfair, because a quality picture would have well-rounded characters, regardless of gender. It seems less like you don't think these movies aren't disrespectful, and more like you are disqualifying them from discussion, which doesn't really resolve anything.

Honestly, I have no problem with your view on these films. And it is great that you are willing to discuss these things. I am simply trying to understand where you are coming from. And maybe once I get that, a true counter can emerge.

Posted by: Vermillion at October 22, 2008 10:34 PM

oh, FINALLY. A good movie by a female director? those are extremely rare these days. I'm glad this one sounds so good. Will definitely look out for it.

Posted by: figgy at October 22, 2008 11:40 PM

And I get so happy every time Queen Latifah shows up in a movie! And a GOOD movie!

I LOVE THAT WOMAN. She'd make the best cool aunt EVER.

Posted by: figgy at October 22, 2008 11:55 PM

If the bees aren't going on a killing spree, and/or not buzzing trees/vines/zombies/otherwise life-impared creatures into going on a killing spree, I pass. A girl gotta have her standards.
Also Jennifer Hudson... eugh.

Posted by: Irina at October 23, 2008 12:40 AM

I loved this book so was naturally leery when I heard a film was on the way. Some of the casting did nothing to allay those fears. But, thanks to this review, I will check it out. Of course, if it is even slightly dreck, bedheads will roll.

To see a GREAT movie about a strong woman, get your hands on "Shirley Valentine", a Brit film starring Pauline Collins who won a Tony for this role on Broadway. She plays a housewife beaten down by the boredom of an existence where she is a doormat to most of her family. She resorts to drinking wine while talking to her kitchen wall
and lamenting her once rebellious nature. Things then change... and not in a Lifetime movie sort of way. This is not "just a chick flick". It is hilarious, real and superbly acted.

Posted by: djo at October 23, 2008 10:10 AM

A to B movies I am basing on cast and production values/budget. When there is a major budget and established actors' reputations involved, the chance of really anyone being denigrated goes way down.

So American Pie... see I think there's a difference between the characters respecting women and the directors respecting women. Again consider American Psycho, which treated women about as horribly as you can imagine, but did so to say something about Bateman. Personally I thought that for a movie of the genre they developed Tara Reid's character fairly well. I mean, yes, she did finally decide to give up her virginity, but that was the culmination of an arc that lasted the entire movie and involved many periods of uncertainty. The college girl that Oz strikes out with at the start of the movie is clearly in the position of power and superior maturity. Really all of the girls in the movie (except Nadia) are more mature than the guys and require them to grow up to some degree before reaching the next level of their relationships. And really Nadia isn't supposed to be a character. As you rightly noted, she is a fantasy, intended to say something about Jason Biggs' character in his failure to have confidence in himself when placed in a "sure thing" situation with a fantasy girl. When you get down to it, it's a movie about the relationship between the guys. Are the male characters in movies about relationships among women usually so lucky? Perhaps I have the same prejudices that I'm railing against, but my perception is that the men in the Fried Green Tomatoes genre are usually either completely evil or one-dimensionally good. But I don't think they're really saying that men are one dimensional, it's just that the movie isn't about them. They are part of the backdrop, there to say something about the women who love or hate them.

Posted by: Eep at October 23, 2008 10:27 AM

Are the male characters in movies about relationships among women usually so lucky? Perhaps I have the same prejudices that I'm railing against, but my perception is that the men in the Fried Green Tomatoes genre are usually either completely evil or one-dimensionally good. But I don't think they're really saying that men are one dimensional, it's just that the movie isn't about them.

Now this is an excellent point, which does make me view certain movies in a different light. Maybe I (and by extension, the viewing audience) shouldn't view lack of development as an insult, at least when it concerns peripheral characters or less-serious pieces.

Still, there are quite a few movies that are insulting to either gender even if the movie purports to speak to them. As I said, I can't think of a single Tyler Perry movie that didn't turn a female character into either a man-desperate emotional basket case or a vile harpy. Of course, the men don't fair any better. And I would consider those A movies, maybe not for the budgets (which are increasing), but certainly for the casts and production.

And even with the consideration of production/budget/cast, several of the films on that list don't really rate as A movies. Well, maybe some of the foreign ones in their home countries were high cost and high profile (and a few were big here), but even Night Watch (one of the most expensive Russian movies ever made) barely touched what an average American movie costs. Hell, $10 million is considered indie budget here.

I guess I still don't see why you are surprised that some people have not seen more films with positive portrayals of women. And I still say that by limiting the discussion to a certain criteria you consider "serious cinema", you are stacking the deck, so to speak.

Posted by: Vermillion at October 23, 2008 7:50 PM

I saw it, thought it was mediocre or maybe I'm just tired of the "magic negro" genre. Can't white folk solve their own fucking problems for once?

On second thought it was mediocre.

Posted by: allheavens at November 3, 2008 11:09 PM