jackie_chan13.jpg

Ain’t No Stupid Like Ratner Stupid

Rush Hour 3 / Dustin Rowles

Film Reviews | August 10, 2007 | Comments (51)


I’m going to go ahead and say it: There’s a certain genius to Brett Ratner. He’s got no more and no less talent than, say, largely unknown directors like Adam Shankman (The Pacifier, Bringing Down the House), Brian Levant (Are We There Yet?, Snow Dogs), or Brian Robbins (Norbit, The Shaggy Dog), but Ratner has been able to parlay that mediocrity into a pretty decent career, mostly involving turning a modest profit with franchises past their prime (Red Dragon, X-Men 3) or extracting every last cent out of a blandly offensive Rush Hour trilogy. He’s a shitty director, but then again, he doesn’t aspire to be much else; he’s just another Hollywood hired gun, different only in his self-made celebrity, which he’s largely created in opposition to those who dislike him (a hatred largely manufactured by Defamer on a slow news day that steamrolled). Hell, if Ratner weren’t so reviled, the only way anyone would know him was from his segment on “Punk’d.” He gives studios what they want — serviceable, substandard fare with just enough flash to make a marketable trailer. He’s space filler — he makes Michael Bay’s work look profound by comparison. I don’t hate Ratner, but then again, I didn’t have anything invested in the X-Men films. To me, he hardly warrants the vitriol a lot of folks direct toward him. It’s sort of like yelling at a kid who wipes his feces on a bathroom stall. He doesn’t know any better, and to call attention to it just emboldens him, which is probably how he got the green light to make Rush Hour 3.

I can also see where some might have a weakness for these films; personally, if I had soft spot for the Rush Hour flicks, I’d hope someone would jab the sharp end of a broomstick in it so that it’d scab over. But that’s just personal taste. These films are completely disposable, completely forgettable, studio-driven cinematic schlock created to sell popcorn, soda, and Ratner action figure (it pees in a keg and makes out with a starletard when you pull its string). Besides setting, there’s absolutely nothing to distinguish Rush Hour 3 from the first two installments. It’s the exact same formula: Invent a bad guy, chase down bad guy, throw in some wicked bad one liners, a few jokes just offensive enough to attract the media’s attention, chase Jackie Chan up a wall, catch bad guy, roll blooper reel (which is always the highlight of these films).

This time, the setting is Paris for no other reason than it offers the Eiffel tower as a decent set piece for the finale, and it gives Ratner another canned stereotype to work with (the French hate America — ha ha ha! French people are gay by virtue of their accent —- ha ha ha!) The film starts with Det. James Carter (Chris Tucker) doing his familiar Michael Jackson routine, only he’s doing it here while directing traffic and throwing in a touch of R. Kelly. He and his partner from the first two films, Chief Inspector Lee (Jackie Chan) have had an unexplained falling out involving Carter shooting Lee’s girlfriend in the neck a few years back. No matter — the ambassador from China is shot, and the two quickly reteam to chase down the people behind the attempted assassination. The trail takes them to Paris, where they learn that the whole motive behind the ambassador’s attack had something to do with the World Criminal Court and a list tattooed on the back of a stripper’s head. I couldn’t quite follow it all, and that was either because it was so smart it went over my head, or more likely: It didn’t make any goddamn sense.

The stuff that Ratner fills in between discovering there is a bad guy and tracking him down is the usual agonizing bullshit: silly racial humor, “Three Stooges” shenanigans, and kung-fu fisticuffs. Granted, the humor here is a bit more offensive than in the previous installments (an Abbot and Costello “Who’s on First” routine with two Chinese men named You and Me is the lowlight). It says something when China — the country that sent us tainted dog food and children’s toys coated with lead paint — refused to import Rush Hour 3. What? They kill our pets and harm our children and they can’t take a stupid “Crouching Tiger Hide your Dragon” joke? Not that I blame them, of course. But I imagine it had less to do with the humor and more to do with the country’s all-pervasive fear that Rush Hour 3 would liquefy their cerebral cortex. The target audience in America doesn’t have much to fear — it melted away a good decade and a half ago, when these buddy cop action comedies rasped their last breath and Ratner took over the title of Head Studio Shill from John Landis.Indeed, Rush Hour looks and feels a lot like a film that sat on a shelf for the last 15 years, waiting for a generation unfamiliar with Lethal Weapon knock-offs to come along and see it with fresh eyes.

Still, Chan — as always — is intermittently fun to watch, though he seems to have lost a step (that’ll happen when you’re in your 50s). Unfortunately, Chris Tucker hasn’t — he’s still running the same old seizure-inducing shtick that expired halfway through Friday into the goddamn ground. The guy has made only three films in the last decade, which is three films too fucking many, if you ask me.

Alas, the best part of the film was a scene in which Chan and Tucker fall down a sewage drain and slide into a huge pit of urine and shit. It’s as close as Ratner is ever going to get to a metaphor, and I almost envy the audacity it takes to flaunt his mediocrity in the face of his audience, as if daring them to grow a goddamn brain cell and take him to task. Unfortunately, I suspect they were too busy laughing at the joke about black people liking sweet potato pie or the nun speaking “brotha” to take much notice.

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. He lives with his wife and son in Ithaca, New York. You may email him, or leave a comment below.









Skinwalkers | Stardust













Comments

I legitimately like Jackie Chan. It's really too bad that he doesn't surface in any respectable work, because I think the guy deserves better than playing a straight man to Chris Tucker.

Posted by: BLA at August 10, 2007 4:41 PM

As I mentioned earlier, I genuinely like the RH movies, especially w/ Chris Tucker. For me, it's just good mindless action/comedy, popcorn-y fluff that will be forgotten in a day or so.

But I dunno, after reading the plot of this one, I think even Chris Tucker won't bring me to this. The girlfriend gets shot in the neck?!? That's pretty twisted. And I'd forgotten the nun ghetto speak moment. Ugh. That made me cringe just seeing the trailer.

Sorry, Chris. No go on this one. I'll just stick to watching Friday on DVD again.

Posted by: Brie at August 10, 2007 4:49 PM

Al I have to do to enjoy these films is remember that Jackie Chan used to do porn. Aaaah. See? It makes everything funnier. It's also what helped me get through all the Rocky's. never underestimate the hilarity of seeing a 'famous' person naked.

Anyways, I think I like Rush Hour 1 or maybe 2? I liked one of them and I just wish Jackie HCan would stop being such a whore. He seems kind of sweet, after all.

Posted by: MaliceAlice at August 10, 2007 4:53 PM

I have never seen a Rush Hour movie because a) Jackie Chan interests me in no way whatsoever, and (more importantly) b) Christ Tucker's voice is like nails on a chalkboard to me. I just can't take it.

Posted by: wsapnin at August 10, 2007 5:12 PM

Recently read the Playboy Interview of Tucker (while they relegated Paul Rudd to the 20Q interview). If the movie was half as boring as this guy I feel for anyone exposed to his "comedy". Good review. As for Ratner, I liked what he did with X:3. Otherwise, he is a glorified music video director.

Posted by: JP at August 10, 2007 5:20 PM

Chris Tucker will always be Ruby Rhod to me.

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at August 10, 2007 5:31 PM

Argh, JP, no! You liked X3? It seemed really bland to me in a Daredevil (film not comic) sort of way. I'm not saying it was horrible, just . . . really middlin'.

I've never seen a Rush Hour movie either; just can't stomach Chris Tucker. This formula works better with Owen Wilson -- I'll take Shanghai Knights.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at August 10, 2007 5:41 PM

"Chris Tucker will always be Ruby Rhod to me."

Bwaaah! Thanks for that Kevin! Your free box of Gemini Croquets is on the way.

Bzzzzz! Bzzzzzz!

Posted by: Manny at August 10, 2007 5:42 PM

I saw an ad for this movie on a bus shelter when I was slightly drunk and riding my bike home from the bar.

At first I thought that I had somehow gone back in time or was having some sort of flashback. Then I came to the conclusion that someone had just accidentally put up an old poster for Rush Hour 2.

...then I saw the "3" on the poster and said aloud "Why the hell would they make a Rush Hour 3?!"

I think that I saw Rush Hour, thanks to my low-brow moving-loving ex-boyfriend, but was just as shocked to see that they bothered to make a Rush Hour 2 so I just avoided it.

Posted by: Cassie at August 10, 2007 5:42 PM

Oops, that should be low-brow MOVIE loving ex-boyfriend. Nope, not still drunk.

Posted by: Cassie at August 10, 2007 5:45 PM

Again, I say, one must read our own St. Paul Pioneer Press review, complete with gems like


"Practically everything Chris Tucker says in "Rush Hour 3" is hilarious"


and


"Which leaves us with helium-voiced, loose-limbed Tucker, a true original who works far too infrequently"


to appreciate the full glassy-eyed contentment with which Middle America views these pieces of mindpoop. My brain hurts. Today, I am not from St. Paul.

Posted by: shyestviolet at August 10, 2007 5:51 PM

Again, I say, one must read our own St. Paul Pioneer Press review, complete with gems like


"Practically everything Chris Tucker says in "Rush Hour 3" is hilarious"


and


"Which leaves us with helium-voiced, loose-limbed Tucker, a true original who works far too infrequently"


to appreciate the full glassy-eyed contentment with which Middle America views these pieces of mindpoop. My brain hurts. Today, I am not from St. Paul.

Posted by: shyestviolet at August 10, 2007 5:51 PM

Not so fast, shyest -- here's a little snippet from the SF Chronicle review:

Chan and Tucker's chemistry is at its combustible best. Cinema nuts will have fun identifying the many references to famous scenes from other movies, lovingly knit together by director Brett Ratner.

In fairness, the review wasn't completely glowing, but there's PLENTY of blame to go around for the success of crudstain Ratner.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at August 10, 2007 6:05 PM

Someone once pointed out to me that the Rush Hour franchise were the most successful and lucrative American films EVER to feature no white leads. Like Oliver Twist (when it finally hit him what his new friends were really up to), I sort of just stood there astonished and had naught to say.

Posted by: Mac at August 10, 2007 6:18 PM

"...and throwing in a touch of R. Kelly."

You mean he's peeing on underaged girls?

Posted by: alone in the dark at August 10, 2007 6:33 PM

Chris Tucker is one eyeroll away from being a truly offensive Step N' Fetchit stereotype. He's up there with Jar Jar Binks in the Characters That Have Made Me Embarassed To Be White list.

I'm almost embarassed to admit being a Prison Break junkie, due to Ratner's association with the show. I console myself that it's really Paul Scheuring that's responsible for everything I like about the show. Well, and the delicious mancandy in front of the camera. *cough*

Posted by: june at August 10, 2007 6:59 PM

Brie-for real tho-you are kidding right?! Jackie Chan did porn? I know Bruce Lee did romance films before action but JACKIE CHAN DID PORN?!?!?!?!?!?

Posted by: Amee at August 10, 2007 7:49 PM

Actually, I wrote that comment, but yes. The Chan did porn back in the day, as did that guy who played Rocky whos name I can never spell. Cracked.com has all the details. It's shaudenlishis. I actually can't find the link right now, but it's out there. I think Cameron Diaz did some lite S&M stuff too?

Posted by: MaliceAlice at August 10, 2007 8:05 PM

I have no intention of seeing this movie, and I, too, wonder why it was even made,

BUT

someone actually said that the pairing of Owen Wilson and Jackie Chan is better than Tucker/Chan. I absolutely MUST disagree. Owen Wilson is beyond annoying and not at all funny. The two had zero chemistry. I don't even think "Shanghai Nights" can even be classified as a comedy.

On another note, during Tucker's long hiatus, it was rumored that he had issues with the cursing and foul language the roles he was offered, due to his religion. Don't know if that's true, but I do get the sense that he's become rather tame since then. And the truth is, Chris Tucker is not a bad dramatic actor. Anyone ever see "Dead Presidents"? He played a tragic Vietnam vet turned heroin addict. Not one of my favorite movies (its depressingly sad), but I thought everyone was really good in it.

Posted by: Ginger at August 10, 2007 9:53 PM

someone actually said that the pairing of Owen Wilson and Jackie Chan is better than Tucker/Chan. I absolutely MUST disagree. Owen Wilson is beyond annoying and not at all funny. The two had zero chemistry. I don't even think "Shanghai Nights" can even be classified as a comedy.

Yes . . . someone actually named . . . socalledonlycousins! Bwahhhh! I think sentence no. 3 of the quoted paragraph kind of tells the story, because it's essentially like saying "I don't like Vince Vaughn." You like Wedding Crashers or you don't, you like Bottle Rocket or you don't, etc., and that's just as valid as any other opinion. Not only do I find him far preferable to Chris Tucker, I find him winning. But he's not on the "If I Had to . . ." list.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at August 10, 2007 10:16 PM

The comment above about a lowbrow boyfriend who subjected his poor girlfriend to watching the tripe that is Rush Hour inspired me to say that if any of you ladies would like a date this weekend to see a movie OTHER THAN Rush Hour 3, I'm available.

As for Chris Tucker, he might very well have had some good roles ten or more years ago, but it's tough to respect the acting chops or comedy timing of someone whose ONLY movies in the last nine years have been the Rush Hour series. He might very well have been doing better or more generous things with his time, and I salute him for that if so, but his presence in movies - whether he gets a $20 million payday or not - seems fairly irrelevant to me.

Posted by: Rob at August 10, 2007 11:43 PM

But I imagine it had less to do with the humor and more to do with the country's all-pervasive fear that Rush Hour 3 would liquefy their cerebral cortex

that's gold...

Why would you make this film? I mean, how long has it been since Rush Hour 2? Nobody remembers it and no-one cares. Bah.

Posted by: rach at August 10, 2007 11:54 PM

I also read the Playboy article with Chris Tucker and was impressed by how he spends his free time, traveling around the world as a relevant do-gooder (if you want specifics, read the article). But I don't understand why he's only done the three RH movies in the last 10 years. Not because he's so good in them I'm dying to see him in something else, but because that's what he considered to be worth his time waiting for. I really don't get it. But I love Friday. I'm going to have to rent that sometime soon.

Posted by: katy at August 11, 2007 1:17 AM

Chris Tucker rocked in Friday and Jackie Brown -- "Good looking out" -- but in his Playboy interview says he wouldn't do those kind of characters anymore.

Socalled -- what can i say, I'm a Sci-fi Slut

Posted by: JP at August 11, 2007 3:39 AM

I love Jackie Chan movies when he makes them in HK. The Police Story trilogy is pure brilliance. Even Rumble in the Bronx is a fun ride and possibly the best US Chan film he has made.

But to watch a Rush Hour movie is to want someone to spend 90 minutes rubbing sandpaper on your face - same effect really; bleeding and pain that won't go away long after you've stopped. Such a shame as his GOOD films are a world apart from his crap American films.

Brett Ratner should just die though, he destroyed Xmen in that last film, it was horrifying.

Posted by: Smartie at August 11, 2007 7:29 AM

well dispite what you chris tucker hating freeks say i think the rush hour tilogy are entertainig mindless fun which is the whole point of these films and nothing else!and in response to one of the comments made about owen wilson being a better partner than chris tucker for jackie chan bullshit shangai nights was just a rip off of rush hour but set in the wild west chris tucker is a very funny man check out the def comedy jam series and you will see just how funny he is as for jackie chan well he just does what he does best kickass and climbs walls like a spider monkey keep the rush hour movies coming i say

Posted by: pb at August 11, 2007 7:58 AM

dude, did you go to elementary school?

there's this new craze...it's called punctuation. jump on the bandwagon.

oh, dude, and also...learn to spell. it might get you laid in the next millenium.

just some suggestions.

Posted by: idiot dentist at August 11, 2007 8:32 AM

There is a lot of mindless entertainment that is meant to be nothing more than mindless - but the point is that it be entertaining and the rush hour series is FAR from it. Watching Flavor of Love is mindless entertainment - the people are so ridiculous that it's funny - watching rush hour 1, 2, or (ugh) 3, is painful. Tucker tries so hard and is still so not funny and so obnoxious that it's actually depressing to watch someone so desperate. Owen Wilson, though not some kind of comic genius, is much easier to watch if for no other reason than it doesn't seem like he's trying as hard.

Posted by: Soda at August 11, 2007 8:51 AM

oh, dude, and also... millenium is spelt millennium.

Posted by: rosie at August 11, 2007 9:09 AM

oh, dude, and also... millenium is spelt millennium.

Posted by: rosie at August 11, 2007 9:09 AM

the rush hour films do what they are meant to, make lots of money for everyone involved, end of story. why bust a nut over it? why bother to hate on Chris Tucker when he is following Ratner's direction and the studio's script? "If you liked the first two Rush Hours you'll like this one, if you didn't, you'll hate it even more than the previous two." der

Posted by: rosie at August 11, 2007 9:19 AM

why bust a nut over it?

Rosie. Read the masthead.

So you're saying that, because of your reasoning, the movie shouldn't be reviewed and we shouldn't discuss it? On a movie review and discussion website?

Interesting idea.

Posted by: TK at August 11, 2007 9:54 AM

you can read it that way TK, or you can read it that to produce a scathing and bitchy review of a Rush Hour movie is like shooting fish in a barrel. knock yourself out buddy!

Posted by: rosie at August 11, 2007 10:18 AM

Ratner gives junk hungry masses what they want: junk. I didn't have any animosity toward Ratner until X3. All of his movies are mediocre but taking the reins from Brian Singer and delivering THAT X3 p.o.s. is unforgivable. Now he has taken to putting "A Brett Ratner Film" in front of his creations as if that's a mark of quality and renown. Rush Hour 3 will probably break records. Whee.

Posted by: Tyler at August 11, 2007 10:24 AM

I was forced to watch Rush Hour 2 my sophomore year in an Asian Studies class (we were supposed to keep a tally of stereotypes but we were really watching it because movies are great filler) and God how I HATED it. I hate the trailers for this, and being a hardcore francophile my blood pressure rises with each joke at the expense of all things Gallic. Anyway brilliiant review as always, filled with sharp image-driven analogy, snark and meanderings into reflection on the nature of the film industry in America, and good point about Ratner's manufactured success--I never really pondered who was behind these awful things.

Posted by: Amelia at August 11, 2007 12:51 PM

The only one good thing about all three of these....eh...things, has been Zhang Ziyi.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 11, 2007 12:58 PM

well dispite what you chris tucker hating freeks say i think the rush hour tilogy are entertainig mindless fun which is the whole point of these films and nothing else!and in response to one of the comments made about owen wilson being a better partner than chris tucker for jackie chan bullshit shangai nights was just a rip off of rush hour but set in the wild west chris tucker is a very funny man check out the def comedy jam series and you will see just how funny he is as for jackie chan well he just does what he does best kickass and climbs walls like a spider monkey keep the rush hour movies coming i say

[*Vermillion sighs, shakes head, mutters:*] "That's a paddlin'."

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at August 11, 2007 1:02 PM

Rosie - fair enough, and you're right, it is like shooting fish in a barrel. However, the alternative is to only review movies that the readers would like or probably like, and frankly, where's the fun in that?

Posted by: TK at August 11, 2007 2:23 PM

[*Vermillion sighs, shakes head, mutters:*] "That's a paddlin'."

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at August 11, 2007 1:02 PM
**************************************************

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

*looks down at Vermilion's sandals*

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 11, 2007 4:29 PM

*looks down at Vermilion's sandals*

... paddlin' the school canoe...

Posted by: TK at August 11, 2007 5:05 PM

Dammit, socalled.

I don't know what is worse: the grammar, that you used ME to call them on it, or that I didn't think of it first.

And screw you, BarbadoSlim, for laughing along.

Posted by: Vermillion at August 11, 2007 5:08 PM

hmmm, TK i don't know if the only alternative is to review movies that the readers would like eg in the case of sequels there are the ones that a Pajiban may have high hopes for but know will break their heart.

my previous entry wasn't very clear as i did use the word review, have no probs with the review, was more surprised by comments as always i guess, the depth of emotion over Rush Hour? "i can't believe i bought a starbucks coffee and it tastes like shit"

anyhooooooo

Posted by: rosie at August 11, 2007 10:27 PM

Umm, so apparently Roman Polanski is in this film, I mean movie?

Posted by: Justin at August 12, 2007 3:22 PM

On another note, during Tucker's long hiatus, it was rumored that he had issues with the cursing and foul language the roles he was offered, due to his religion.

But he doesn't have a problem feelin' up the scantily clad women? Or that his character wants to sleep with any woman seemingly attractive who's willing? What the fuck ever, Chris Tucker. If the rumor is true, then he's even more full of shit than I previously thought. Man, that whole "I found religion" routine is incredibly annoying, and it is ironic that he was referenced as channeling R. Kelly in the review (who went through a similar "I gots me some 'ligion" period). No one is twisting his arm to make RH movies, and as far as I'm concerned, the world would be a better place if he makes no more movies.

That said, Jackie Chan doing porn? Is hilarious. Oh, the benefits of a Pajiba education!

Posted by: Daphne at August 12, 2007 7:14 PM

Choosing who is better: Chan/Wilson or Chan/Tucker is like playing a game of 'Who's the smartest retard?'

That being said...retards can be funny sometimes, so I don't mind RH3 being made. i just won't give it my money...which I knew I wouldn't be doing anyway. HBO will eventually show it and on a lazy Sunday evening when I have nothing better to do and I don't feel like touching myself, sure I'll watch it.

Posted by: PissBoy at August 13, 2007 12:01 PM

Hi.. i totally thought that Rush Hour 3 was a joke.. it was a major waste of time where jackie, chris and ratner do whatever they want for the hell of it. it was a big ass joke~!!
P.S. PLEASE REVIEW EL CANTANTE... WOULD LOVE TO HEAR UR OPINION ON IT.

Posted by: Gigi at August 13, 2007 3:29 PM

Wow, quite a snippy little comments section we have here...

Rush Hour 3 is just an annexe of Norbit Syndrome: sitting in a movie theatre, waiting to watch the feature presentation and that trailer is the only one that gets the entire audience laughing. This tells me two things:

1) The guy next to me is going to check his phone constantly throughout the movie and give a running commentary on what's going on despite the fact that it's fucking Die Hard 4.0 and really not that hard to understand

2) There is no hope for humanity.

Posted by: Alex the Odd at August 14, 2007 4:52 AM

I need an opinion/interpretation of a scene in the RH3 trailer from you trusty Pajiba readers/commenters. In that part where Chris Tucker tells an asian bad guy to stop embarassing himself because he's asian and speaking french.. Isn't that a little offensive? I read it that way, whereas a friend said it's supposed to be a joke about Americans hating the French?

What is the joke there? The whole theatre laughs during that part in the trailer and I have no idea why.

Posted by: JL at August 14, 2007 3:28 PM

I need an opinion/interpretation of a scene in the RH3 trailer from you trusty Pajiba readers/commenters. In that part where Chris Tucker tells an asian bad guy to stop embarassing himself because he's asian and speaking french.. Isn't that a little offensive? I read it that way, whereas a friend said it's supposed to be a joke about Americans hating the French?

What is the joke there? The whole theatre laughs during that part in the trailer and I have no idea why.

Posted by: JL at August 14, 2007 3:29 PM

I have no idea JL. See above re: no hope for humanity.

Posted by: Alex the Odd at August 15, 2007 4:12 AM

i for one was sooo relieved when the nun was revealed not to be maggie smith. whew.

Posted by: egg at August 22, 2007 11:05 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time