free counter with statistics Rocky Balboa | Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

blue.jpg

Eye of the (Old, Cowering, Defanged) Tiger

Rocky Balboa / Dustin Rowles

Film Reviews | December 26, 2006 | Comments (84)


I’m not going to lie to you, folks. Rocky Balboa is bad. But it’s not nearly as dreadful as I’d long feared, when it became clear that I wasn’t going to be able to appeal to The TV Whore’s Philly origins and have him cover it (apparently, he’d rather review a cooking show. I’ll let his football buddies know.). Beyond being bad, however, Rocky Balboa is impossibly sad. Sad because the film mostly serves as a reminder that the world has passed Sylvester Stallone and his Rocky character by. Sad because it’s hard to laugh at an aging former superstar and his aging former superstar character when you feel so much pity for them. And sad because Rocky Balboa might not have been that bad a film, in 1982. But now it’s like seeing a little old lady with blue hair slap on three inches of pancake makeup, some smeared lipstick, a few orange highlights, and a pair of stilettos and try to seduce a 23-year-old beefcake. It’s creepy. It’s heartbreaking. And it just makes you want to give the old lady a hug and tell her to go back to “Wheel of Fortune.”

In fact, there was a small part of me that wanted to see the movie succeed, if only so that Stallone could recapture a tiny bit of the dignity he’d left behind in Rocky V and all the subsequent films (Judge Dredd, Stop! Or My Mom Will Shoot, Oscar, Driven) that basically erased whatever esteem the man once held in our collective pop consciousness (Cop Land notwithstanding). After Arnold went into politics, Stallone became the last holdover from the era of dumb, musclebound ’80s action flicks, and though I never liked a damn one of them, it still put a small lump in my throat to see the once-mighty fall so low.

Rocky Balboa picks up in the present, 16 years, I guess, since Rocky V. Rocky Jr. (Milo Ventimiglia) is all grown up now, and an accountant for some corporate outfit. But he and his father aren’t on intimate terms, on account of Rocky Jr.’s resentment toward the shadow that Rocky’s legacy casts over his life.

Balboa himself is a seemingly content man: He runs a successful restaurant, is not hard up for money, and is a legend in Philly, where everyone knows and respects him. Unfortunately, Adrian is dead (the restaurant is named in her memory), having passed away several years earlier from cancer, so Rocky is a bit on the lonely side. He and Paulie (Burt Young, who is either drunken and deranged in real life or playing as much here — I can’t tell) spend much of their time reminiscing and visiting old haunts (replete with flashbacks to earlier Rocky films), where Rocky gets weepy and nostalgic about Adrian while Paulie only gets increasingly surly (or, at least, that’s what I think he was trying to project — dude can’t act, even a little bit).

One of the old haunts is a bar, which leads Balboa to Marie (Geraldine Hughes), a bartender with whom Rocky forms a platonic relationship (platonic, so as to not shit on the grave of Adrian). Rocky helps Marie out by getting her a job at his restaurant and acting as mentor to her teenage son, Steps (James Francis Kelly III), whose only purpose in the film seems to be to stick around long enough to name a dog that Balboa has adopted from a shelter (both Steps and the mutt appear to be part of a couple of storylines that were later abandoned, left on the cutting room floor — probably for good reason).

Anyway, at some point much, much later in the film than you’d either expect or desire, ESPN runs that computer-simulated fantasy bout, matching Rocky Balboa in his prime against the current undefeated champion of the world, Mason “The Line” Dixon (it’s good to see that Stallone still has a penchant for inflammatory, colorful names, at least). Dixon (Antonio Tarver), well … he’s a punk. He’s cocky and arrogant, and a bit of a creampuff, taking only fights he knows will lead to victory, which doesn’t endear him to any fan base — he’s sort of the modern-day Mike Tyson, who just happens to make a completely unnecessary cameo in the film.

Once Rocky sees the fantasy bout (and his victory in it), he decides he wants to get back in the ring, despite lacking any motivation to do so. Really. None whatsoever. No pride on the line. No lack of money. No Cold War bullshit. No need to prove anything. Nothing, except maybe a distaste for Three 6 Mafia. Rocky just decides, after a weepy scene with Paulie (and seriously, no one needs to see Sly cry; he looks like the goddamn Toxic Avenger), that he wants to fight again. Because he’s bored, I guess.

So, he ultimately reckons that, “The world ain’t all sunshine and rainbows,” reunites with his son, and gets back in the ring. The good news, for Rocky fans at least, is that “Gonna Fly Now” makes a rousing return for the training montage, which has Balboa punching meat and running up those famed Museum of Art steps and delivering another fist to the sky. (Sadly, Survivor’s “Eye of the Tiger,” makes no such return appearance — I know; I was crestfallen, too.)

Stallone once again writes and directs, as he did for three of the first five installments (though he wrote all five). Once he gets in the ring, he films the scenes as though he’s just discovered Microsoft Paint. He throws in a few unnecessary black-and-white shots, a few grainy ones, and then a few more where the color of blood seeps through the black and white, and — I think — he even adds a few of those stock graphics you find as background images in make-your-own-video machines at amusement parks. It’s pretty awful. The boxing match, at some point, actually gets so completely absurd that you find yourself giving in to it. You just have to shake your head, laugh a little, and offer the tiniest of props to Stallone for daring to expose his geriatric chisel to the world. It’s cheesy. It’s lame. But, it’s so harmless that it’s hard to feel outraged by it.

Obviously, I won’t clue anyone in as to how the exhibition match turned out, except to say that, sadly, Rocky Balboa doesn’t suffer a brain aneurysm and die, which introduces an otherworldly fear that, potentially, this might not be the last we see of Rocky. But the film does have one saving grace: its almost poetic treatment of Philly. Sure, it’s a poem written by an illiterate, nine-year-old Mongoloid, but it’s still kind of sweet, in the same way that receiving a hand-painted drawing from a toddler for Christmas is. It’s a shame, however, that you can’t hang Rocky Balboa on the refrigerator and forget about it until Rambo IV comes along.

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. He is currently halfway through a three-year ‘sentence’ in upstate, NY, where he lives with his wife. You may email him, or leave a comment below.









Pursuit of Happyness, The | Good Shepherd, The


Comments

hahahaha calling Mike Tyson a creampuff, the internet makes you brave little man.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 20, 2006 4:41 PM

I'm pretty sure Stallone didn't direct the first Rocky, either. I think both the original and Rocky V were directed by John G. Avildsen (who also directed the three Karate Kid movies).

Author's Note: Right you are. Noted and corrected. Thanks.

Posted by: Sean C at December 20, 2006 4:53 PM

I knew from first sight that I wouldn't see this movie, not because I haven't seen any of the other ones, have no interest in the Rocky series, and think Silvester Stallone is the most ridiculous actor ever put onscreen, but because it would make me sad to see someone punch an old man.

Posted by: Cheryl at December 20, 2006 5:02 PM

i was at the taylor-hopkins fight in vegas where part of this was filmed. "now, we have something very special for you, stick around, we're filming a scene for the new ROCKY MOVIE!"

after a bit, stallone was brought out as though he was going to fight, and we were told to cheer, it was rocky balboa, blah blah blah, and in the crowd we were all turning to each other like, 'wtf? wtf!' the cheers were half-hearted at best. no disrespect to sly or anything, but that ship has sailed, and everyone in the crowd knew it, and among us we were asking each other, "why the fuck are they making a new rocky movie? i mean, seriously."

it was all pretty sad. my guess is they had to dub over that scene to get the cheers they wanted.

Posted by: S. at December 20, 2006 5:09 PM

oh yeah; here's an image from aforementioned scene filming:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/ofthrees/328490099/

Posted by: S. at December 20, 2006 5:14 PM

"And seriously, no one needs to see Sly cry; he looks like the goddamn Toxic Avenger."

Best laugh I've had all day--takk!

Posted by: ranylt at December 20, 2006 5:52 PM

I'd forgotten what a great word mongoloid is!

Great review, totally turned me off the film, thankfully, it seems. I'm enamored of the way you're metaphorically beating the crap out of a senior citizen through the entire review. It's like this aged person has challenged you to a good-natured fight and though you feel a little bad about duking an old guy, he keeps asking for it and telling you not to take it easy on him. It's fantastic.

Unrelated, this first poster's Mike Tyson hero worship is almost quaint. It's like a little bit of 1989, right here at Pajiba. What a treat.

Posted by: Adam Michel at December 20, 2006 6:19 PM

You're damn straight I'd rather watch a cooking show than see the further degradation of The Italian Stallion, despite my Philly origins. If anything, that's amplified because of my Philly origins - I may treasure Rocky a little more than I should, and it's all the more reason I don't want to see four movies' worth of good memories chipped away (seriously, Rocky V didn't happen, no matter who says otherwise - it just didn't).

And based on your review, I think I made the right call, sucker.

Posted by: TV Whore at December 20, 2006 6:53 PM

Where the hell did you get the impression that I worship that retarded 250pound ear-biting rapist? Are you some kind of moron?
It's precisely because of those three cited reasons why I wouldn't call him a creampuff (at least to his face). So no, no 1989 time trip it's just you being a douchebag on Dec. 20 2006.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 20, 2006 6:59 PM

I don't care what nunyall says, you can't keep me away from this purely American, fist-pumping, steaming pile of dog crap. If there's one comedy to see all year, it's this one.

Posted by: zoso at December 20, 2006 7:01 PM

Surely you must mean Rocky VI at the end, not IV?

Posted by: Sarah at December 20, 2006 8:21 PM

Oh my God. I can't recall the last time I laughed so hard reading a review. I have to agree with Adam Michel on the metaphor. Brillant, I say! Poor Sly - I don't know what he was thinking. Or what idiot(s) convinced him to make another Rocky movie. That person (or those people) should be fired immediately. Admittedly, though, I did enjoy Assassins. Shut up.

Posted by: Daphne at December 20, 2006 8:48 PM

I understand your explanation later on, but your initial post seemed like you were all over Mike Tyson jock, BSlim. Go easy on Adam Michel.

Posted by: BDouglas at December 20, 2006 9:08 PM

Fresh off the heels of reading Bill Simmons' review of this movie, an interesting confluence of events has happened. It is very rare thing when I agree with him and he with you (Pajiba). I laughed out loud at his and then I come here and embarrass myself at work with one helluva chortle at the Toxic Avenger reference. I am also in agreement with the TV Whore in the fact that Rocky V never, EVER, happened.

Posted by: ScarletKnight at December 20, 2006 11:30 PM

"Sure, it's a poem written by an illiterate, nine-year-old Mongoloid, but it's still kind of sweet, in the same way that receiving a hand-painted drawing from a toddler for Christmas is."

Hi-fucking-larious!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Megan at December 21, 2006 1:30 AM

Megan: Not really; some of us don't find Mr. "Illiterate Mongoloid" Rowles' incongruent appeals to racism very humorous. It's getting to the point where my friends who read Pajiba are just skipping over his reviews. I'll probably do the same.

Posted by: Kia L. at December 21, 2006 2:34 AM

Kia: "Mongoloid" isn't a racist term. It's what Down's Syndrome children used to be called. It's along the lines of "retard," "dimwit," or some other derogatory expression for those, um, a bit less than mentally gifted. Which may still not make it particularly humorous to you ...

Posted by: Lilywise at December 21, 2006 2:59 AM

Lilywise, educate yourself so you never use this word as an insult again.

Peace

Posted by: Chen at December 21, 2006 4:15 AM

You do realize that this site and Simmons are basically the only two places you'll find bad reviews of this movie?

It's almost as if the two of you took the pre-opening criticisms (he's too old, this ship has sailed, etc etc) and just jotted them down instead of actually watching and reviewing the flick.

Honestly, it wasn't that bad. Everyone I personally know that saw it liked it, and like I said, I'm seeing about 80% favorable reviews from the net so far.

Posted by: J. Weezy at December 21, 2006 4:22 AM

Oh, for Christ's sake, now we're getting offended over use of the word "Mongoloid"? I swear, people actively search for shit to get offended by. And Chen, if you'd scroll further down in your link, you'd see that Lilywise was actually correct in her definition as well.

Anyway. I can see why this would make a person sad. Particularly me, since, and I say this completely without irony, I truly enjoy Rocky I, as well as First Blood. Those two + Copland are Stallone's best work, and they are actually very effective. But to watch an old man get punched around, especially in these waning days of boxing, is unfortunate. Not to mention the inherent ridiculousness of Rocky getting motivated to fight because of... a video game? What the fuck is that?

Finally, I find it amusing that in both First Blood and Rocky, his sidekick/mentor is played by someone who COMPLETELY overacts - Burt Young as Paulie and Richard Crenna as Col. Trautman.

Posted by: TK at December 21, 2006 9:38 AM

Sarah:
Dustin's referring to RAMBO IV, which should be creaking its walker-carrying ass into a theater near you in a couple of years. I hear he's still working on the script.
Anyway, Rocky III and IV were two of my favorite movies as a kid, and I still haven't/can't watch V all the way through. I'm convinced that Sly is purposefully taking a shit on my childhood. I agree with Dustin that it's depressing to watch a past-their-prime action star reaching for their past glory, especially when we have to endure a shirtless muscle-flab glory-grasp. And this Milo Venwoeihv;sdye guy is my least favorite actor on Heroes, so he can rot in this film.
All that said, I'll watch it on HBO next year.
P.S. Speaking of past-its-prime, I watched Superman Returns last night and it sucks balls.

Posted by: Kballs at December 21, 2006 11:34 AM

I don't know - I feel like Sly isn't all that deserving of vitriol. There are so many other offensive actors out there to heap shit on.

Anyway, I flinched at "mongoloid", too. It's a very outmoded word for kids with Downs - it was very commong, too. I don't think people are being too sensitive about it.

Posted by: Samantha T at December 21, 2006 12:08 PM

So..........
People actually read this site for its politically correct content.....?
Shit, where have I been?!

Posted by: artgal1990 at December 21, 2006 1:22 PM

To me,Stallone is like Van Damme (or however you spell it) except his crappy acting isn't hilarious, just painful.

Posted by: Squarah at December 21, 2006 1:46 PM

Artgal990 - no, but the reviewers are smart dudes who hold filmmakers to very high standards (as they should). I see no problem with pointing out to them if they've used insensitive language. They generally handle this kind of criticism very intelligently and appreciate hearing their readers' opinions on the review itself - prose included.

Posted by: Samantha T at December 21, 2006 5:38 PM

Samantha T...vitriol is a bit strong. Seems like Dustin as well as most of those commenting are just confused as to why Sly is still trying to ride the Rocky (and apparently Rambo) wave. Sure, he is not the most offensive of actors, but that doesn't mean this movie needed to be made. Hell, there were four sequels prior to this one - what else needed to be said? Plus, he hasn't aged particularly well, so I get some of the "walker" references.

Posted by: Daphne at December 21, 2006 7:02 PM

Perhaps then Mr. Stallone should have chosed a different name for his opponent as it is also offensive. The Mason-Dixon Line? Freedom vs. Slavery? How is that not offensive. As far as mongoloid goes, I found it quite funny and I have worked with people who have Down's Syndrome. It would be a horse of different color were Sly actually a retarded kid, but that is clearly not the case...I think.

Posted by: ScarletKnight at December 21, 2006 7:12 PM

YOU'RE MY BOY, BLUE!

Posted by: Vincent at December 21, 2006 7:59 PM

Some of you are missing the point on why "mongoloid" is such a nasty slur -- it used to be the anthropological term for the physical characteristics of Asians, and only later took upon the supposedly egalitarian definition of dullard when it was applied to Downs children. Insulting Downs kids is bad enough, but using a term of race to do so and thereby connoting the idea that Asians are stupid and inferior is even worse.

It's sad to see it used even on Pajiba.

Posted by: David at December 21, 2006 8:57 PM

If there are any mongoloids reading this, please weigh in on the subject. I'd love to hear it. I am so so sick of this pervasive sanitization of language to spare everyone's precious feelings. This is the result of soccer moms saying "Good job" every time Junior tosses a pack of Froot Loops into the grocery cart.

Author's Note: Be that as it may, I'll concede it was poor word choice; in my muddled little brain, I actually thought that Mongoloid was a synonym for Neanderthal. And, after the first person took offense, I felt like I was living my very own Geico commercial. At any rate, pardon the offense. It was simple idiocy.

Posted by: MrG at December 21, 2006 9:27 PM

Yeah, it may have been a poor word choice, the author admits as much, but isn't what he meant more important than what he actually wrote or the words he used?

He wasn't using the term "mongoloid" to demean people of Asiatic descent or to malign the mentally retarded. He meant to poke fun at Stallone's idiocy and missteps in writing and making this film. Jesus Christ, you'd think he was Michael Richards or something.

Posted by: PP at December 21, 2006 11:59 PM

Dustin- I'm definitely with you on feeling the pain of the omission of "Eye of the Tiger." It's like watching the Sly's other movie "Over the Top" without the song "Over the Top."

The Rocky series lost it for me after they killed off Apollo. That was sacrilege.

Posted by: Gigi Worthington at December 22, 2006 5:39 AM

I agree with the above poster. I realize this is a Pajiba site, but Dustin Rowles and a few others are the only reviewers who have panned Rocky Balboa. Though I haven't seen it yet, I'm looking forward to seeing it since I enjoyed the original Rocky but didn't see all the versions II-V.

What drew me to seeing this latest (and presumbly last) Rocky movie is exactly the reasons Dustin hates about it. Yeah, it might be unoriginal, repetitive, yada, yada.... however; that's what made it popular in the first place and not just by Philadelphians. Sly & Rocky are synonomous personalities, and although Sly Stallone is not a boxer he is a fan and knows about boxing and boxers. IMO, Sly pretty much captures the ups and downs of a former Heavy Weight Champion as seen in the movie. So lighten up Dustin, and let Rocky (Sly) shine in his championship season.

Honestly, it can't be that bad (it grossed $60 million on its premiere day). Approximately 75% of the other reviews have been highly favorable!

Posted by: M. Castle at December 22, 2006 8:51 AM

I'd recommend reading Sly's interview in the latest Entertainment Weekly, if you're feeling sorry for him. He is 100% aware of how this movie may appear to others, but his reasons for making it are actually pretty non-pathetic. He's actually got a pretty decent sense of humor about it and comes right out and says that it's hard to get older in Hollywood. I appreciate a man saying that, for once.

Yes, I'm sticking up for Sly in print. Have always had a soft spot for that droopy-eyed mofo.

Posted by: Samantha T at December 22, 2006 10:08 AM

Gotta say that I love the pic for this review!!!

Posted by: Alli at December 22, 2006 11:01 AM

I'm with Samantha T on this - I think Stallone is far more self-aware than we give him credit for. He was on local radio show in Boston last week and actually gave a pretty good interview. So while it doesn't appeal to all (myself, a Rocky nut, included), I'm not gonna knock his motivations *too* hard.

However, I'm still fine with Mongoloid.

Posted by: TK at December 22, 2006 11:42 AM

Gotta tell you... as much as I love Pajiba, I think you're dead-wrong about this film.

But I'm an old softie.

It's a fine little film. Earnesty bleeds out of every shot. There's more heart in this film than most anything released in '06 (though that's not saying much, but I digress).

I loved it.

Posted by: Dario Delfino at December 22, 2006 12:25 PM

The new rocky movie kicked ass- it was beautiful- if you have a heart for the way we as human beings work through our lives-- and the message was great compared to what we are told to believe every damn day of our lives- we ought to fight- stand up and say I am- we don't point the finger and roll over becoming victoms of our lives- You are not a victom- life is totally about taking the hit and continuing to move forward. I loved this film,-- I was worried after rocky five that it would be another flop but-- but it did not dissapoint -- Work hard--- what's wrong with a movie that inspires you to do that? All the other movies this year - politically whining about where we are at in the world today- this one inspires you to change it and to actively fight for what you believe in---Activism vs. Pacifism-
let's bring back that american spirit--- no one "owes" you nothing- you are responsible for what you make your life-
If I could be rocky- I would

Posted by: kenzo at December 22, 2006 5:07 PM

1) I would rather see a fake Rocky/Mason fight than a real fight between anybody in boxing today.

2) I'm on a casual Rocky fan, but I really enjoyed this one. It's just about an old guy looking back and figuring out what he's about.

I thought Rocky being so old was pretty relevant to sports today. There are a lot of 40 year old pitchers doing pretty well, and guys like Jerry Rice who stay in the NFL successfully. Foreman came back in boxing.

Sports writers have spent considerable time lately speculating as to why athletes compete past their prime, and why they tarnish what would be amazing careers.

The best answer is probably that they are competitors. It's what they do.

Anyway, it's not like Rocky did anything amazing in this one. He just boxes in an exhibition match against an out of shape champ that doesn't take him seriously.

I thought it was worth seeing.

Posted by: Joe at December 22, 2006 5:31 PM

For what it's worth, I read the EW interview. My opinion still stands - I see no reason why another Rocky movie was necessary. I get why Sly wanted it made, but I don't really think there was a growing constituent of movie goers feeling hopeless because of Rocky V. Plus, the story of the Rocky the underdog has been told five times already. I don't know, I have no problem with recurring themes in movies, but I can't help thinking that the money spent on this film could have been used on another project providing a fresh take.

And it somewhat confuses me that we're in a world where a celebrity being coherent, dare I say, insightful is a big deal. I guess I have a stone-cold heart, as it's not anything particularly special, IMO. Perhaps I'm giving celebrities too much credit, but I'd like to think most of the underexposed celebrities are fairly intelligent, self-aware folks. Also, I could take for granted that I'm among well-spoken people almost every day.

Anyway, I totally agree that the Rocky franchise lost me once Action Jackson was out of the scene. Sacrilege, indeed!

Posted by: Daphne at December 22, 2006 7:03 PM

I LOVED THE MOVIE, IT IS A MUST SEE TO BE HONEST, YOU ALL NEED TO PAY RESPECT TO STALLONE WHO GAVE US THE BEST INSPIRATIONAL UNDERDOG STORY OF OUR TIME. I CAN'T RELATE TO ANYONE WHO WOULD NOT BE EXCITED TO GO BACK TO PHILLY AND ENJOY THE NOSTALGIA OF THE STORY AND BE INSPIRED BY THE HEART OF A CHAMPION IN A MAN LIKE YOU AND I. WE ALL GREW UP ON ROCKY AND THE SOUNDTRACK THAT IS AS GREAT AS THE IT'S LEGACY. I RELATED TO ROCK AS HE WAS GOING THROUGH SOME PAIN BUT HAD THE COURAGE TO WALK TOWARDS IT, AND FIGHT DESPITE NAYSAYERS AND SHOW HIS SON THAT HE PRACTICES WHAT HE PREACHED IN POWERFUL LINES THROUGHOUT TO GET HIS LICENSE AND HIS SON OUT OF THE MATRIX OF WHAT HE WAS LIVING IN, ONE I CAN RELATE TOO AS WELL. I DONT KNOW WHAT ELSE YOU CAN ASK FOR IN A MOVIE BUT A HERO WHO MOTIVATES YOU TO GET UP FROM HITS OF LIFE AND KEEP FIGHTING. THAT IS WHAT WINNERS ARE MADE OF BUT OBVIOUSLY YOU ALL DONT KNOW WHAT HEART IS ALL ABOUT. GREAT JOB STALLONE, YOU DID DO IT FOR ROCKY AND YOURSELF.

Posted by: DRAGOS SON at December 22, 2006 8:01 PM

"even to the dull and the ignorant;
they too have their story."
*desiderata*

I am not referring to Rocky. I am referring to the reviewer. You said something extremely interesting to me. You said at one point you started to "give into it"..."it's hard to feel outraged".People like you miss the point entirely. Sly like Rocky and anyone whoever hustled a day in their life realize that life and the rest of the world co-exist as a series of of mutual compromise.Whether or not it's taking a title shot or some dill hole is talking through a movie you just paid 10 bucks to see. You have to root for your enjoyment,, happiness,, whatever. I have always been what sophisticated sports fans would call a 'Homer'. Not just about sports (although seriously Da Bears am I right or am I right). You shouldn't have to give in to having a good time. You should have to give in to having a bad time.
It is a great film unless you were looking
for a movie about cooking.

Posted by: Southside Johnny at December 22, 2006 11:13 PM

"even to the dull and the ignorant;
they too have their story."
*desiderata*

I am not referring to Rocky. I am referring to the reviewer. You said something extremely interesting to me. You said at one point you started to "give into it"..."it's hard to feel outraged".People like you miss the point entirely. Sly like Rocky and anyone whoever hustled a day in their life realize that life and the rest of the world co-exist as a series of of mutual compromise.Whether or not it's taking a title shot or some dill hole is talking through a movie you just paid 10 bucks to see. You have to root for your enjoyment,, happiness,, whatever. I have always been what sophisticated sports fans would call a 'Homer'. Not just about sports (although seriously Da Bears am I right or am I right). You shouldn't have to give in to having a good time. You should have to give in to having a bad time.
It is a great film unless you were looking
for a movie about cooking.

Posted by: Southside Johnny at December 22, 2006 11:16 PM

It is such a great comment I felt it necessary to post it twice. I rule ! Yo Adrian ! I did it.

Posted by: Southside Johnny at December 22, 2006 11:22 PM

I too flinched at "mongoloid" - thanks for making amends! If anything, at least you've gotten the people who read your reviews to realize it's just as offensive a term as "retarded", "gay," "homo," or "fag" when used in a derogatory way, especially if you're not referring to a mentally retarded or homosexual person.

Yes, I'm a teacher. And I tell my students the same thing. I'm not one for political correctness, per se, so don't get all "Oh my god no one can say anything anymore blah blah whine whine!" It's a matter of respectful language, that's all.

Also, I won't go see Rocky. Sly should have accepted that his past has passed, in my opinion. He's like one of those 65-year old grandmas who wears skin-tight clothes, high heels, boob jobs, and their newest face-lifts with pride. O let your youth go gracefully into that good night...

Posted by: Ariel at December 22, 2006 11:23 PM

Do not go gentle into that good night,
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

Dylan thomas

Posted by: Southside Johnny at December 22, 2006 11:31 PM

Drago's Son.... shhhh, little one. Gob ack to bed before you wake up mom and dad.

Posted by: TK at December 23, 2006 9:39 AM

Drago's Son.... shhhh, little one. Go back to bed before you wake up mom and dad.

Posted by: TK at December 23, 2006 9:40 AM

Drago's Son.... shhhh, little one. Go back to bed before you wake up mom and dad.

Posted by: TK at December 23, 2006 10:18 AM

See, this is why you shouldn't make fun of mongoloids. Nice try honey. Keep hope alive,,, eye of the tiger,, etc etc.

Posted by: Southside Johnny at December 23, 2006 3:41 PM

"Oh, for Christ's sake, now we're getting offended over use of the word "Mongoloid"? I swear, people actively search for shit to get offended by." -- TX

Happened to me once or twice with the word "mulatto", which used to be the polite way of saying "interracial". I still think it's better than "mutt" which really sounds like an insult.

There's a great song called "Mongoloid" but I can't remember who did it? Ramones?

Posted by: Matt at December 23, 2006 9:40 PM

Actually, I am mulatto. And I'm in no way offended by the term. I think interracial is clunky and sounds like you're talking about porn. And Matt, I think it was Devo that did Mongoloid.

Posted by: TK at December 23, 2006 11:00 PM

This film, yes although told many times.. was an amazing piece of history in the making. It had to be made to conclude a rather horrible Rocky V.. that being said the movie was rather inspirational. Simply put a guy whose considered a bum can put such heart into such simple words was the most amazing thing I've ever seen an on-screen character do. The movie although not the GREATEST OF ALL TIME deserves its compliments. I was happy with the film. It was also realistic a boxer who cannot posess speed will often posess strength so a lot of personal and physical battles were faught.. I in no way thought about what ive just said.. that being said this movie was well drawn. by the way.. mongoloid for all you people who care.. because feel like stirring trouble.

Posted by: T at December 25, 2006 12:58 AM

I am very ambivalent with regard to my opinion about this film. There were many good moments. Specifically, the scenes of Stallone with Ventimiglia standout for me. The image of Adrian standing at Rocky's doorstep nearly succeeds as the most haunting image I have seen all year in cinema (I still can't watch "United 93" again).

And yet I got the impression that Stallone treated me to some re-heated leftovers. The big fight 'tween Balboa and Dixon matches in terms of editing and score to the Re-Match in "Rocky II." Nothing new there save the verisimilitude of Lampley and Merchant's color commentary. The only poignant moments in the fight scene come by virtue of the spliced ghosts of Shire and Meredith, who along with Weathers were the only consummate actors in the Rocky series.

And I think there in lies the disappointment for me. "Rocky Balboa" shines outside the ring. The relationships between Rocky and his family (real and extended) are beautifully realized and wonderfully paced. But once Balboa starts training Stallone leaves his supporting actors behind grinding the film to a halt. It's as though all the character development were just so much smoke and mirrors to keep the moviegoer enthralled long enough for the Theatre Manager to avoid having to hand out the inevitable re-fund.

Posted by: Mr. West at December 25, 2006 6:58 AM

"Isn't there some sorta law against Mongoloids serving food to the public? There oughta be."

One of my favorite Tarrantino penned lines ever. I know it has nothing to do with the film at hand but all this mongoloid talk just popped it into my head and I have to get it out.

Posted by: Matty at December 25, 2006 11:18 AM

Dude, a 60-year-old achieved an 8-pack. At that point, who cares about the (numerous, glaring) plotholes. Have some respect, man! And fyi, I am a 22-year-old charging you to pay respect to what I the history books tell me is a legend.

Also, this was my first Rocky; maybe it's the holiday spirit, but I now want to rent the first one because a) I want to see what the whole Adrian business was about and b) this last one was admittedly bad, but it's not nearly as bad as others I've seen recently and it so wanted to be good, and if this is the weakest link I don't think I'm wasting my time on the strongest. Bring on the montage.

Posted by: Becca at December 25, 2006 10:39 PM

Good Call Becca - Rocky does deserve respect, first of all - check out his arms cuzo, call me crazy but I won't be messin with that 60 yr old anytime soon and second -this movie wasn't all that horrible. Granted it does seem a tad bit absurd for a man whos had as many birthdays as Stallone to jump into the ring with the reigning champ but, dare I say it, I was impressed with the fight.
You can't teach an old horse new tricks - but you can definately watch a stallion kick some ass - no matter how old he is.
Listen, most of the reviews badmouthing Balboa are from people who haven't even seen the movie. What does it boil down to? Go See It. Decide For Yourself.
Fighters Fight

Posted by: Rocko at December 27, 2006 12:47 AM

IMO:the character is a LEGEND,the actor is a human being(and a surprisingly warm,nice guy(EW interview)..ive yet to see this movie,as i'm in the u.k,but there is something you can take away from EVERY rocky film(even V.),be it a line or a funny,tender moment,or the feeling of your dream being achievable,which stallone's writing definately inspires.R.I.P adrienne.forget tommy gunns and ivan drago,big up mickey and apollo.its official like the referees whistle,i WILL be paying to see this film,which is more than i can say about most of the hollywoodland nonsense released this year.happy holidays...

Posted by: F.T.A. all day at December 27, 2006 4:54 PM

What a fuck are you talking about.The only comment that had sense was of F.T.A. This goes to the other guys who think that rocky 6 was a shame. Well If your admiration for this movie was threaten by a fear of silvester stallone letting you down(fucking pendejo) as easy as not watching it. As said, he is a legend. Just a little question: Do you think he cares for how you feel o think about him?? or is he in for the money?... If you are going to complain, then I invite you to do not see the next rambo... Lets hope you all don't watch it.

Posted by: Alexander at December 27, 2006 6:42 PM

Whoa Alexander.. I think I agree with you, but I can't be too certain.. Your not makin too much sense there bud

anyway Sir U.K. was dead on when he said theres always something to get out of a Rocky Movie. Bottomline chill out with the trashtalkin.
This movie contains the Legend. Show some Respect
The Price of a movie ticket is a small one to learn from the Italian Stallion

Posted by: Hmm at December 27, 2006 10:10 PM

Sometimes I think people just look for negative things to write because it's too much to just sit back and enjoy a "feel good" movie. We have to overanalyze, overthink, and complicate good movies because it just feels good to bash the hell out them. Plus it's really cool when one can provide really big, seldom used words while doing so to show us just how creative, witty, and oh so smart they are. It was a good movie, I enjoyed it. Get over it.

Posted by: SamShade at December 27, 2006 10:11 PM

I CANT BELIEVE THE REVIEW YOU HAVE GIVEN FOR THIS MOVIE. ITS OBVIOUS THAT YOU ARE NO WRITER, YOU DONT UNDERSTAND WHAT THE WHOLE SERIES ARE ABOUT DO YOU? YOU ARE JUST A PATHETIC LITTLE MAN WHO LIKES PUTTING OTHER PEOPLE DOWN. THIS WAS A GREAT MOVIE, I HOPE YOU SERVE A LIFE SENTENCE UP THERE WHEREVER YOU ARE. I WILL NOT WRITE A LONG REPLY COS YOU ARE NOT WORTH IT BUDDY! SCREW YOU CREEPO!

Posted by: soroush at December 28, 2006 12:05 AM

Wow, Soroush-
Please stop YELLING AT US ALL! And for the love of God, take the caps button OFF!!!

Posted by: Helcat at December 28, 2006 11:23 AM

Was it a great movie? I don't think so. But it erased the bad memories of Rocky 4 and 5 for me, and I thought it was a fitting end to the series. Certainly better than if it had just ended with 5.

If George Foreman can get back in the ring in his 50's, I can buy Rocky at whatever age he was.

The way I see it, if this movie was Rocky 5 (and ended the series there), then some of the negativity surrounding it would have eased. As it is, the reception to the movie has been pretty positive. I think it's hard not to compare Stallone with Rocky in this movie, both over the hill but capable underdogs.

Posted by: Steve Lang at December 28, 2006 7:39 PM

Definitely one of the best movies I've ever seen in my entire life. Unbelievable scripting, acting was amazing. A perfect end to the Rocky series. The writer of this column seems like he has a little too much hate in his blood. Jealousy is a terrible thing. Rocky for president

Posted by: jesse at December 29, 2006 11:09 AM

To SamShade about those negative reviews and "big, seldom used words" :

It doesn't make me "feel good" to critique "Rocky Balboa." It doesn't make me feel above it all. I don't need validation from others on a messageboard to boost my sense of self-worth.
But posting my review of "Rocky Balboa" does elucidate (hope that's not too big a word) my thoughts about the film and "get over it."

And if you or anyone else would like to re-read my post I did give some positive points about the film. But ultimately for me -- again for me -- the sum of this picture does not equal its parts.
I am not overanalyzing or overthinking just giving my honest opinion.

I am glad that you enjoyed the film. But I think that you would have to agree that you cannot think for everyone else on this board.

Posted by: Mr.West at December 29, 2006 7:09 PM

This review seems to be unnecesarily harsh on the movie. I just saw it tonight and didn't think it was really that bad. There were some cliche moments, and there was some emotional mind f*ing (particularly at the beginning) which I -embarassing to admit - fell for, but I guess that's what this Rocky's all about. It's kind of the goodbye tribute film - the legacy of Rocky ends here, and let's just remember the glory days one more time before Rocky walks off into the sunset. I mean why not? How can anyone hate Rocky? Seriously - I agree with points like, what's the real motivation to fight again, and it ended up being kinda anti-climactic, because there really wasn't much at stake this time. But I guess it's hard to hate this character that's just a sweet, kind guy who makes goofy pre-schoolesque jokes (often at his own expense) and is a little lonely. There's often very little wrong with having heart.

Posted by: surly suzie at December 30, 2006 1:32 AM

Your review was written well and I see why you didnt like the movie. I have been a Rocky fan since the first one. I did not care for Rocky V but upon seeing this movie I was suprised. I really liked this movie. It may be pushing the limits , but hey , isnt that what a movie does? I enjoyed it and would tell any Rocky fan to go and see it. Thank You.

Posted by: Mike at December 30, 2006 9:28 PM

You know what dude. Your wrong, the movie was great. He didn't try to make himself look like he was something he wasn't. Sly is a brilliant story teller, and it was a brilliant end to one of the greatest heros of all time. There is not one bad movie in the bunch, and Rocky Balboa was simply magic.

I don't know why people like you insist that the movie sucked. The movie deserves an award, and alot of the quotes and lesson will stick with me for the rest of my life.

Your a sad little man Dustin and I encourage any of the people who read this to go and see the movie for themsevles. It's pure magic.

Posted by: Mike at December 31, 2006 3:20 PM

Dustin, not to beat a dead dog but your review was on the spot.

Posted by: Mr.West at January 3, 2007 2:14 AM

Saw the movie on New Years Eve and it's not perfect but I think it's he best since the 1st or II. Rocky III, IV and V, in my opinion are the embarrasing far-fetched chapters in the series. Even with a cheesy bar-scene, unnecessary added affects in the fight, the fact that Spider Rico and Marie make an appearance 20+ years later, and Rocky's opponent's name, Balboa is STILL FAR BETTER than III, IV or V. Mason Dixon (eh, smirks). Clubber Lang (laughs histerically). I'd watch Antonio Tarver act over Mr. T anyday.

Posted by: rob at January 4, 2007 2:28 AM

You are some of the most easily offended people on the net. If I were a writer for this site I'd be afraid to use the term Nip-Slip because some of you will yell at me for using a racist term for Japanese people in WW II. Its sad when you have to dig through old anthropology textbooks to know if you should be offended by something.

I thought the movie was OK, though. I never saw the older ones, I just got dragged to this one because I made them watch 'Tae Gu Gi: The Brotherhood of War' so I wasn't able to compare it to Rocky 1-whatever.

Posted by: Matt 2.0 at January 4, 2007 8:07 PM

I understand where Dustin is coming from and he has a point. Rocky is old and was yesterdays news and after Rocky V i wouldnt even show my face! But what can i say, i have a soft spot for Rocky ya sure he didnt have the brains but he went in with brute force and heart! and you dont see too many movies like that these days. And just for that im still giving the movie an A+ sure the story direction etc.. all deserve at most a C/B-.. When its all said and done, i wanted to shout with the crowd 'Rockee Rockee' and just for that to bring back the memories of Rocky I II and III. A forgotton icon and to bring finally a decent ending (Rocky V killed the whole series! i was soo disappointed with that) to a great icon! i am content and i give it an A+... Rest in peace Rocky you done good! sure it wasnt with grace and spunk and w/e not.. but still you came through... good for you!

Posted by: Joel at January 7, 2007 1:20 AM

Rocky had some stuff left in the basement, let him let it out...Why can't you people understand that?...

Posted by: Rocky at January 9, 2007 7:11 PM

Rocky Balboa was quite good I thought. You cite his age/clownish appearance/infeasibility etc etc as detractors but both the film and it's obvious correlation to it's creator embrace these stereotypes in such a manner that they become central to it's success. You are suppossed to be the jaded critic /flimista with the firm, preconceived belief that the entire premise is ludicrous. I was, and when I left the theater- I wasn't. Kudos to Mr. Stallone for his austere treatment of himself, his creation, and to some extent the generation that gave us both.

Also, it's not so much that the word "mongoloid" is stunningly un-pc, fuck pc. Metaphoric retard jokes just lack wit and flair, which are two things you should keep in sharp supply given this poor review.

Posted by: gmoff at January 11, 2007 2:49 PM

what a fuking coments, roky was very good.

Posted by: tarzan at January 18, 2007 12:56 PM

most of you guys are too young to know what its like to see yourself slowing down. Rocky is a guy past his prime still trying to figure shit out. Guess what? you never stop. Yea Sly is old, compared to you maybe but in shape yea! Jack Dempsey beat the shit out of two muggers in his eightys. you pretentious, little chicken chested pencil necked, never fought or kept coming back. Sly made some dumb ass movies, so did all the little punk bitches making movies now. Hey I'm 57 get in the ring with me. I'll rip you a new one.

Posted by: Gus at January 20, 2007 11:44 PM

Great movie. What an inspirational undertaking. I must admit I was dubious about the whole project but having seen it....Stallone, you're back on top. A very humble movie with none of the old "look at me, I'm the champ". Rocky comes back to us as the man who started it all. The hard-working, underpayed philosopher who just wants what we all want...a chance to prove to ourselves that we deserve to be here. If you've got half a brain..like our reviewer here...don't watch it. This movie is all heart!!!

Posted by: John at January 22, 2007 9:54 AM

I would have to agree completely with Gus, even though I'm only 21 years old. This movie hits upon a subject that either you can comprehend or you can't. If you can't, then it is a waste of your time to go see it. It's about the ceaseless need for a man to have goals and ambitions. It is about the need to constantly re-evaluate your situation in life and try to determine how it can be improved upon, because once you think you are at a safe, comfortable place, that is when you get lazy and life loses its meaning. Without goals and something to look forward to, we are directionless, unproductive, and ultimately unhappy with ourselves. This movie was about the pursuit of that happiness, but more importantly it was about the NEED for that pursuit; for the pursuit of whatever fulfills you. For Rocky, he's a fighter, and so fighting is it for him, but this movie can be applied to anyone's situation, fighter or not. If you are sitting on your ass with no aspirations, this movie will hopefully break through to you this vital point. If not, well, hopefully you will figure it out some day. Great movie.

Posted by: joe at January 24, 2007 1:40 AM

I am a huge Rocky fan. But I was skeptical about how this one would turn out. And having gone seen it with a neutral attitude, I found out it was nearly the best one he made. I totally got into the fight and had no idea what to expect to come out of it, even though he had been hinting for years what would happen. Most movies made these days are brainless. I suppose if you don't have a brain, you can't appreciate a movie unlike all the others.

Posted by: Duda at January 28, 2007 2:08 AM

"Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. He is currently halfway through a three-year 'sentence' in upstate, NY, where he lives with his wife. "

Well done fucknut! A Rocky review from a crim. Ur a cocksucker and to be honest, probably haven't even seen the movie - probably just heard about it from a prison guard. And if the "sentence" part is a joke - someone needs to put u in jail for a fucked up review.

Rocky VI (or Rocky Balboa as it is commercially called) is the perfect ending to one of the greatest characters and stories ever produced in a movie. Yall whine about Stallone's acting and his appearance - if u think it was such a shit job, why don't u go and make one urselves and then we'll see how fucked up ur talents are.

Stallone put his rep, his career and himself on the line with this one and I think he came out on top. It probably won't be enough to get him an oscar or any major film role, but it showed he still has what it takes to be a good movie maker and actor. He played to his strenghts (which was the Rocky character) and came up with something special.

Some people just don't like the Rocky movies altogether, and that's fine. Not everyone will like everything. But if u put this movie into context within the whole Rocky series, it's the perfect fit and and damn good stand-alone movie to boot.

So Dustin Rowles - why don't u go spend more time with "Bubba" and get the raping u deserve for giving Stallone and Rocky a raping they didn't. And the rest of u jerks that just hang shit on Stallone and Rocky, get a life.

Cheers for reading!

Posted by: MafiaRob at February 17, 2007 11:04 PM

its just a movie guys... and a good one too. the new age who love cgi movies may not like it. but the fact remains that its an earnest effort and a wonderful movie to put an end to the series. [hope its an end:)]

Posted by: raulf at February 25, 2007 1:36 AM

I felt the same way when they made Karate Kid III.
And Police Academy 6. God I miss the '80s.

Posted by: Tony at April 27, 2007 3:30 PM

let me just say that i waited for this movie to be released on DVD so i could get it with my netflix membership. now, i wish somehow i could get reimbursed for the rental.

the first 55 minutes or so i actually enjoyed...as the characters' relationships were developed and a similar pace to the original 'rocky' movies was introduced. and then, out of the blue, 'rocky' was in the ring. what a terrible example of screenwriting. i am convinced the last 35-40 minutes of the movie was filmed to cater to outside interests...the acting is terrible, the action is patchy and unrelated to the first half of the film...marie urging rocky to 'win' just like adrian...wasn't it CLEAR in the early part of the movie that rocky WAS NOT looking for that sort of relationship? and then all of a sudden, steps, marie's son, is a corner man?

i could go on and on, but here's a synopsis of this movie (do not dare call it a film).

rocky sentimental. rocky try to play off the fact that Talia would not be in the sequel. throw in several appearances by Sly's buddies and you have a movie that should have ended with rocky falling from a bar stool and slowly fading away. i only wish the accountant that robbed rocky blind in the earlier sequel would have appeared in real life to do the same to Sly...so this abomination would not have come to theaters.

'rocky' should have been killed at the end of 'rocky II' somehow.

i haven't been this disappointed in the tail end of a movie since 'from dusk till dawn'. it's like everyone involved completed the first part of the project and then smoked a lot of crack...and then finished the movie to buy more crack.

or steroids.

Posted by: uneequeone at May 17, 2007 4:23 AM



searchthesite.jpg