web
counter
 

She's Volatile

By Steven Lloyd Wilson | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (19)



the_losers_cool_pic1.jpg

The Losers is almost everything an action movie is supposed to be. It’s funny, clever, and realizes that the violence is as much about the dance as it is plot. It has major problems though, that are infuriating given just how good this could have been.

So, there’s this group of elite soldiers down in Bolivia, led by tumor-ghost-sex himself Jeffrey Dean Morgan. They break orders in order to save some kids, get stabbed in the back by a voice on the radio known only as “Max” and find themselves condemned, presumed dead, and stranded in the middle of nowhere with no cash, no passports, and a need for both revenge and a clearing of their names. Explosions and witty repartee ensue.

First, the problems. [sigh]. The fact that the problems could have been fairly easily fixed is the most frustrating part of the whole thing. There’s not much in the way of the eye roll plot problems that would render the entire movie moot. More just the sort of lazy film making that itches at the part of your brain that insists on thinking. For example, twice the team’s plan revolves around them smashing through a fence in a vehicle, which absorbs all manner of gun fire just in time for them to hop out and shoot everything within half a mile with Olympian level marksmanship, while suddenly their enemies who just pinpoint struck every inch of the vehicle cannot manage to get a bullet within ten feet of the five guys standing next to the vehicle. The second time it happened, as approximately seven thousand rounds of automatic weapons fire struck the vehicle, I thought, ah, the van’s empty and now they’re going to jump out from elsewhere. Nope. Same thing. Michael Weston would have had a way better plan than that.

There are a number of problems in the same vein. There’s the aforementioned cliched and epic ineptitude of enemy marksmanship. There’s the appearance out of thin air of pseudo-magical gizmos like a crossbow that shoots a purple thing that keeps an armored door from opening. When necessary, multiple armed guards will be disarmed by handcuffed good guys simply because they have protagonist membership cards. The plot reasons for going from point A to point B would make more sense if simply mumbled inaudibly.

But for all that, The Losers keeps a grin on its face the entire time, with a sort of manic humor that makes you like it far more than you should. It features consistently entertaining dialogue, quick and fluid banter that just flows throughout the film. It eschews the one-liner in favor of constant interplay between characters about things that have little to do with the plot. Chris Evans, who’s slated to play Captain America, absolutely kills with his comic timing. And Jeffrey Dean Morgan is simply dripping with sardonic sad-eyed charisma.

The best part of the film is the villain, Max, played by Jason Patric. Max is the bad guy I want to be when I grow up. Stealing billions, massacring children, conspiring to start wars, oh he’s sociopathic, but he has a bloody good time doing it. There’s a great exchange between him and a henchman in which Max threatens a terrified scientist and then nods significantly at the henchman. Said henchman proceeds to throw the scientist off the roof.

“Why’d you do that?” Max asks.

“You nodded.”

“That was a ‘punch him in the face’ nod, not a ‘throw him off the roof’ nod.”

“I’m sorry.”

“It was at most a ‘break his fingers’ nod.”

If you’re going to be evil, you’ve got to feel the fun.

The film is based on an ongoing comic book series, by Vertigo (seriously, I’ve got a couple hundred graphic novels and 2/3 of them are Vertigo, do they publish bad comics?). So there’s plenty more material to draw from and the movie ends more like the season finale of a television series than a stand alone film. It’s clearly built as a setup to seamlessly leap right into more films. If The Losers has a decent opening and makes back its budget, (and really if it doesn’t beat J. Lo’s turkey basting what kind of world do we live in?), then it might get the chance to do that. If the film gets a second entry, they really need to tighten up the sloppiness.

Good? Bad? It’s charismatic and a hell of a lot of fun if you can overlook the issues.


Steven Lloyd Wilson is a hopeless romantic and the last scion of Norse warriors and the forbidden elder gods. His novel, ramblings, and assorted fictions coalesce at www.burningviolin.com. You can email him here.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The Back-Up Plan Review | The Weekly Murdertank 04/24/10









Comments

I, um, don't think the comic series is ongoing. It had a big climax and everything.

Posted by: Malky at April 23, 2010 7:27 PM

Yep, pretty much what I suspected it'd be;
will probably catch it at some point. I like the idea of Javier Bardem and Stringer Bell on the same team.
Too bad about the old Wildly-Variable-Bad-Guy-Marksmanship syndrome though, that's something that can't be ignored, ever.

Posted by: actwithoutdoing at April 23, 2010 7:32 PM

Malky: Huh, you're right. Sorry about that, when I looked it up on wikipedia it said "Ongoing Series," but upon closer inspection that meant in terms of the format of the issues, not the overall status.

What was your take on the comic series? Worth reading?

Posted by: Steven Lloyd Wilson at April 23, 2010 7:35 PM

"If you’re going to be evil, you’ve got to feel the fun."

I am evil, and I try to feel the fun everyday. Sometimes it's just tiring, though.

Glad to hear this is just in-line with expectations. Fun, forgettable.

Posted by: MM at April 23, 2010 7:44 PM

I will definitely go and see this purely based on the series. SLW Your so right. Most of what they publish is good and I am a fussy Bastard.

Posted by: peanut at April 23, 2010 8:00 PM

tumor ghost is gorgeous.
i loved drinking him in, despite rainbow killer's presence and the general crappiness of grey's anatomy.
it's a shame that the film isn't as well thought out as it could've been, but i'm almost willing to see it just so the j-monster doesn't win this weekend...
then again, i'm sure it'll be just as satisfying to catch it on netflix rather than pay exorbitant amounts at the theater, so i leave it up to the rest of you.
i think it'd probably be best for me to watch ghost tumor in action alone in my house anyway-they might arrest me for self abuse otherwise.

Posted by: wonky tired at April 23, 2010 8:34 PM

Didn't they all die in the comics? Maybe not in the Vertigo stuff, but in the original DC comics?

Posted by: Ken Hart at April 24, 2010 12:04 AM

Jeffrey Dean Morgan had me at "Joker." Unf. So wrong, but so hot.

Posted by: linny at April 24, 2010 12:26 AM

...that would be The Comedian.

Getting my crazy hot psycho super people all mixed up in here.

Posted by: linny at April 24, 2010 12:28 AM

SLW, I love you, man, but: "armed guards" is already plural. See the "s" on the end? In English, that means "more than one." But it's vague; could mean two, could mean a vagillion. What a coincidence! "Multiple" is equally vague. Could mean two, could mean a vagillion. "A few," "some," "many" -- as vague as they are, they're more specific that "multiple." Nobody thinks "a few" means more than 10,000. We probably aren't REALLY talking about a vagillion armed guards. More like "a number I couldn't be bothered to count but much closer to 'many' than 'a vagillion.'"

So why did you use "multiple"? Did you think "armed guards" just wasn't plural ENOUGH? Or just trying to sound like you're writing a police report?

The beer brings out the copy editor in me and I hate redundancy and I don't fuckin' apologize for it.

Posted by: , at April 24, 2010 2:49 AM

Then you'll love this. From a post re: the South Park episode with Mohammed:

Anonymous: "Muhammed was a pedophile who had married a 6-year old and screwed her when she was 9."

Anonymous2: "The had in the previous post is redundant."

Posted by: Brenton at April 24, 2010 3:43 AM

"suddenly their enemies who just pinpoint struck every inch of the vehicle, cannot manage to get a bullet within ten feet of the five guys standing next to the vehicle..."


I believe this phenomenon has been called The Stormtrooper Effect. No matter how patently efficient the antagonist is they can't seem to take down anyone vital to the plot. It also happens to Ninjas.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 24, 2010 6:38 AM

Logic in a balls out action movie?

The worst part of the movie was that one of of the trailers that preceded it was for Step Up...3D Kill me now.

Posted by: Adam C at April 24, 2010 7:18 AM

What was your take on the comic series? Worth reading?

I thought so. It seems to be more serious than the movie sounds (can't say until I see the whole thing yet). If the trailer is to be believed, Aisha (Zoe Saldana's character) has way too many lines. Still sexy as hell, just more of a "stabby" than "talky".

The banter is there though. And Max is just as deliciously evil. The ending...kinda soap-operish for my taste, but they try to sell it as hard as they can.

Point is, at least give the first trade a shot. That should give you an idea if you want to continue.

Posted by: Vermillion at April 24, 2010 8:44 AM

The English major in me has to point out to the nitpicky copy editor in you that some (or all) of the plurality of guards could have been unarmed. Thus, armed multiple guards establishes that among the the plurality of guards, there were multiple individuals who were armed.

I'm just sayin.

-Frob

Posted by: frobme at April 24, 2010 12:22 PM

SLW: I read The Losers in its TPB format, and am really curious to see how Peter Berg decided to approach the story arc in transitioning the comic to the big screen. It sounds like they probably had to re-jig Andy Diggle's original quite a bit in order to shoehorn the involved plot into two hours, while still leaving lines open for the sequels (did someone mention an earlier DC version, as well?).

Anyways, I've been looking forward to this movie, hoping they retained the fun bits without fucking it up too badly. From what you say it sounds like they've made some good casting choices and despite the caveats, it should be a fun way to kill a couple hours.

I'm not a huge comics fan in general, but I agree with you about the consistently high quality of DC's Vertigo imprint. Have you read Mike Carey's Lucifer? While not in the same action/adventure genre as The Losers, it is a brilliant expansion of Neil Gaiman's character from The Sandman.

*****

Oh, and in reference to the nitpicky grammarian who tried busting your balls for referring to "multiple armed guards"... WTF?!? Clearly buddy has had limited exposure to the printed word in its myriad forms across these interwebs, otherwise he would long since have lost his mind in frustration at the relentless and egregious slaughter of language that abounds in far more flagrant instances than your negligible alleged redundancy. (Jeez, does it show that I've been watching Deadwood reruns lately?)

Posted by: Robi Saint Antoine at April 24, 2010 2:47 PM

I thought it was a fun flick. Decent action, great, weird villain, and I really enjoyed Jensen, Pooch, and Couger's interplay. Plus an excellent song by Journey. And JDM can get in me at anytime.

It did lose me at trying to make me believe Zoe Saldana's stick form could kick anyone's ass. But she looked pretty!

Adam C, my theater just started laughing at the Step Up 3D trailer.

Posted by: Jennifer at April 24, 2010 4:59 PM

(did someone mention an earlier DC version, as well?).

The original Losers was a war comic about four super-awesome soldiers who were all the sole survivors of their original units and thus considered "unlucky" by their fellows, so they were assembled together to form a super-unit, kinda. Also they had a dog.

It's a fun war comic, as 1960s war comics go.

I'm not a huge comics fan in general, but I agree with you about the consistently high quality of DC's Vertigo imprint.

Vertigo puts out plenty of bombs. They're mostly ignored because they last for one collection which nobody buys. Nobody is going to come here and say "hey guys when are they going to make a The Exterminators movie" - or American Virgin, Kid Eternity, Crusaders, American Century, Codename: Knockout, Mobfire, Ghostdancing, Angeltown, The Extremists, Outlaw Nation, Deadenders, Testament, Haunted Tank (I cannot believe they fucked up Haunted Tank so badly), The Filth, Army@Love, The Witching or Brave Old World. Black Orchid is proof that Neil Gaiman can write shitty comic books. Swamp Thing has had multiple terrible, nigh-unreadable runs. And you ever notice that there aren't any collections of Animal Man or Doom Patrol that aren't written by Grant Morrison? There's a reason for that.

Vertigo publishes daring, brilliant stuff. A lot of it. But the reason they have such a good reputation for publishing daring, brilliant stuff is because they also print a lot of total dogshit that nobody remember six months after they cancel it.

Posted by: mightygodking at April 25, 2010 3:19 AM

Hey now mgk, American Century and Exterminators were great! Though I would agree no sane person would ever make a movie of either of them...

Posted by: Adam C at April 25, 2010 2:41 PM