web
counter
 

This Place Is a Prison and These People Aren't Your Friends

By TK | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (26)



rec01.jpg

As a general rule, there are two things that are frequently lacking from modern horror movies: They generally lack originality, and they usually aren’t particularly scary. I’ve written about it before, but the general trends these days are a focus on gore and jump scares. My favorite horror movie of the previous decade was The Descent, which may not have been the most original concept in the world, but it was scary as hell, had an amazing sense of atmosphere, and was just clever enough to overcome its shortfalls.

2007’s [Rec] falls into that same category. It’s brilliant in its simplicity, doesn’t treat the viewer like a moron, has fairly engaging performances, and is, frankly, scary as hell. Directed by Jaume Balagueró and Paco Plaza (both of whom co-wrote it with Luis Berdejo), this Spanish production wades through familiar territory, but still has flashes of originality coupled with a strong cast, solid writing, and an understanding of what people fear. It’s an amazingly efficient film — clocking in at a mere 75 minutes, it’s a rush — a fast-moving, brutally violent, nasty exercise that barely gives you time to catch your breath.

The story is relatively uncomplicated. Filmed through the lens of a television cameraman, Angela (Manuela Velasco) is a news reporter for a show called “While You’re Asleep” which covers events in the city that take place after hours. She and her cameraman Pablo (Pablo Rosso, who is never seen and is, obviously, also the actual cinematographer) are doing a puff piece on firemen when a call about a woman trapped in her apartment comes in. They rush to the building, where they and the dispatched policeman find the woman in her apartment, clearly deranged. She attacks and bites the policeman, and you can easily guess what comes next. Similar to the Rage Virus in 28 Days Later, the bites are contagious and quickly all hell breaks loose in the building. However, instead of the larger scale of Danny Boyle’s film, [Rec] takes its cast into far more claustrophobic places. The authorities have sealed the building, cut off communications, and no one is allowed in or out, leaving Angela, the firemen, and the hapless residents trapped as their numbers dwindle, and the numbers of the atavistic, cannibalistic infected grow.

Filmed with a sort of The Descent meets Cloverfield mentality, [Rec] combines the tight, tense confines of the building — all narrow hallways, twisting staircases and small, dimly lit rooms — with the simple cinematographic style of a hand-held camera. Fortunately, it’s being handled by a professional, so it’s not quite the nauseating, dizzy affair that Cloverfield was. Instead, it creates one of my favorite kinds of horror film atmospheres. By being so close to the cast members, in such cramped quarters, it gives the feeling that you’re right there with them, making the tension that much more effective, and the scares even more so. It uses the same organic styles of The Descent — there’s no artificial lighting, instead using only the actual illumination of the building lights, thus heightening the in-the-room feel for the viewer. And on the occasions when the lights go out, it becomes that much more terrifying.

The acting is all pretty much pitch perfect. While little back story is given to any of the characters beyond what you learn from simply watching them, you know just enough about them to care about them, and to fear them when they change. The foundation of the film is Velasco’s Angela, who serves as the de facto narrator of the unfolding events, and her combination of eager news hound mixed with terrified citizen is bolstered by her solid performance. This minimum of exposition actually serves the film well — you’re given no background, no information beyond what the cast learns as the story progresses, making you feel as nervous, paranoid, and confused as the characters. As with all foreign films, make sure you watch the subtitled version (it’s entirely in Spanish), so you don’t miss any of the natural nuances of the performances.

[Rec] is another example of how minimalist filmmaking can be much more effective than bloated, over-budgeted productions. It’s a fresh take on a familiar theme, and its techniques translate the dark atmospherics and constant, ominous feeling of dread perfectly, without feeling gimmicky. Its ending takes a turn towards the truly bizarre, but still manages to satisfy you. Watch it alone in the dark (as I did), and you’ll find yourself wholly absorbed, shoulders hunched as they approach every corner. Best of all, [Rec] is flat-out fucking scary, which is reason enough to watch. Everything else is just gravy on top of it.

TK writes about music and movies. He enjoys playing with dogs, raising the dead, and tacos. You can email him here.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Pajiba Love 05/13/10 | The Five Least "Gay" Gay Characters on Television | Exposing the Hypocrisy of Ryan Murphy









Comments

Was watching this at all similar to the DMTH debacle for you?

Posted by: Ian at May 13, 2010 2:12 PM

How does it compare to the American remake, Quarantine? I've heard Quarantine was a near shot-for-shot remake. For the record, I thought it was scary as hell and pretty damn good. I just wish the trailer hadn't ruined the final scene.

Posted by: TylerDFC at May 13, 2010 2:13 PM

Rec trumps The Descent for me as my top horror of the past ten years. Now The Descent is almost perfect but Rec did something that hasn't happened to me while watching a film for a very long time - it actually scared the shit out of me.

Posted by: TheChief at May 13, 2010 2:17 PM

I just recently learned about this film and added it to my queue, It is now being moved to #2, directly beneath The Descent.

Posted by: admin at May 13, 2010 2:18 PM

Ohhhhh...so the 2008 movie Quarantine was a remake of this. Gotcha.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at May 13, 2010 2:18 PM

Quarantine is essentially a shot for shoot remake of [Rec], only with worse performances, a slower pace, and horrible unintended racism. There's a final action sequence in Quarantine that trumps the ending of the original Night of the Living Dead on the "Really???" scale. The remake is an effective little chiller, but it doesn't quite hit all the notes as clearly as the original. I enjoy both, but prefer [Rec].

Posted by: Robert at May 13, 2010 2:24 PM

I totally didn't see your post TylerDFC. It takes a rare horror film to actually scare me, The Descent didn't do it and neither did Quarantine. If Quarantine is almost a dead on remake of [Rec] I guess that means I can skip it.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at May 13, 2010 2:24 PM

Other than Deb Morgan, I did not like Quarantine much. Mediocre acting and minimal. I always heard that the original was much better. Great review TK.

*Queued*

Posted by: Riles at May 13, 2010 2:28 PM

minimal suspense, that is.

Posted by: Riles at May 13, 2010 2:29 PM

I've seen both Quarantine and [Rec]. In that order. The remake is fairly close to the original, but there are some things in the remake not in the original, and vice-versa. The original is definitely scarier, since I had seen Quarantine not more than a week before and [Rec] still managed to scare the poops out of me.

I also think there is something to be said concerning the casting of well-known actors in a movie like this. Seeing Jennifer Carpenter (Debra on Dexter), Jay Hernandez, and Jonathon Schaech sort of took me out of the shared horror that you are able to maintain when watching the original. To me the actors in [Rec] could have been real people in this situation because I don't recognize them. It makes it easier to get lost in the narrative and the situation that they are trapped in.

I agree with TK's review completely. It is a fast-paced movie that really delivers the scares missing from so-called horror movies today.

Posted by: Pinky McLadybits at May 13, 2010 2:31 PM

Hoi vey, I remember seeing this in the cinema back in 07. I've NEVER been genuinely scared of a horror movie, ever.
This had me hiding behind my dads sleeve for the final ten minutes. No joke, like a five year old, hiding behind his sleeve.

Posted by: Nadine at May 13, 2010 2:43 PM

I hate hate hate hate hate scary movies, but damn this looks too good to pass up.

ugh, at least I can watch at home, safely protected by three pillows and The Hubs.

Posted by: Stella at May 13, 2010 3:07 PM

quarantine drove me batty - i would literally mute the TV at times just to get a brief reprieve from jennifer carpenter's hysterics. i think this is the main reason i've stayed away from [rec], but it sounds like perhaps this isn't the case with the spanish original...

Posted by: aprileee at May 13, 2010 3:13 PM

[rec] was fantastic - really scary, really well-acted, and the perfect length.

Posted by: samantha t at May 13, 2010 3:24 PM

Thanks for the responses, guys. I'll check out the original now. I tried to get it from Netflix when Quarantine came out but it wasn't available then. I resorted to a torrent but since it was in Spanish without subtitles I never watched the bootleg.

Posted by: TylerDFC at May 13, 2010 3:27 PM

Hey, I really JUST watched [rec]2 over the weekend and moseyed on over here to see if either of the set had been reviewed. Neither had. I was disappointed, but now I see you anticipated me and were preparing this review even as bemoaned its absence. Looking forward to the [rec]2 review next week!

BTW, it isn't nearly as good. Did that help?

Posted by: J. K. Barlow at May 13, 2010 3:41 PM

Mmm. Gravy. I'm glad the gravy is on top of it, I hate under-gravy.

Posted by: peachfish at May 13, 2010 4:19 PM

Quarantine wasn't bad it was just unnecessary. They could have just re-released the original. Also the original has a demonic possession plot thread that isn't touched on in the remake.

I imagine that we're going to go through the same thing when the remake for Let The Right One In comes out.

Posted by: John W at May 13, 2010 5:46 PM

I saw [Rec] the day before I left to study abroad in Barcelona. Three delirious plane flights later, I stepped into my white tile, tall staircased apartment building. Where I was living on the top floor.

I'm relatively certain I escaped alive, but this could all be a hallucination.

Posted by: Victoria at May 13, 2010 6:06 PM

[Rec] is better than Quarantine even though the remake was almost shot-for-shot the same. It's in the performances and the fact that, because it's a foreign film, you are not aware of who the actors are. That allows you to buy into the characters as real people getting filmed while the insanity happens.

Also the denouement works better in the original (even if its a bit convoluted).

Posted by: Fredo at May 13, 2010 6:19 PM

I wonder if the remake was almost shot for shot the same movie. I wish someone would mention that. 12 times.

Posted by: Name: at May 13, 2010 7:56 PM

I saw Quarantine before I saw [REC], and I found the former film an agreeable timewaster. The latter film scared the SHIT out of me.

Quarantine fell into the American film trap: THE AUDIENCE IS TOO STUPID TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS GOING ON; ADD MOAR EXPOSITION. It actually brings the film to a screeching halt for an autopsy sequence where they take the time to theorize about what's going on.

Meanwhile, [REC] takes a more organic approach and trusts the audience to keep up and put the pieces together. The characters find clues that give a general outline of what is going on (and personally, I think the original's explanation is much more frightening than the remake's). Also, scarier [REC] monsters are scarier.

Has anyone heard that Quarantine is a nearly shot-for-shot remake? I read that somewhere.

Posted by: Craig at May 13, 2010 8:11 PM

If you liked [rec] I would say don't see the second one, it blew nards.

Posted by: blahblah at May 14, 2010 4:23 AM

This is the only horror movie that I've seen recently that made me sleep with my lamp on for 2 weeks straight. I am 27 years old. Sad, or awesome? I like to think it's a bit of both.

Posted by: Lyric at May 16, 2010 6:28 AM

I finally watched Quarantine last night (as my FBjibers will know =p) and YIKES does that film suhuuck.

All I can do really is reiterate the points already made ; it is INDEED shot for shot, but with all the charm and scary removed.
Jennifer Carpenter flips from barely contained fear to hysterics WAY too quickly and the screaming fear becomes annoying hysterics in 0.000001 of a second, which as people have said, removes the sense of growing fear and basically shouts at the audience THERE PEOPLE ARE SCREAMING YOU SHOULD BE SCARED NAOWWWWWWWWRAAAAAAAAAAAARGH

Also, and SPOILER SPOILER

In [Rec] the virus is supposedly caused by a possessed girl who's illness or possession has infected other people. She still lives, (sort of) in the building and turns up at the end as a monstrous, emaciated figure, glimpsed in horrifying flashes through a night vision lens, lunging and staggering about in the dark.
She is everything you where scared of as a child, and more. She is every witch and boggle and long fingered Thing that made you jump into bed rather than risk it grabbing your ankles.
She is terror.

In Quarantine, the demonic possession is done away with and replaced with the vaguest of vague allusions to a Doomsday Virus stolen from a lab by eco terrorists.
We're left to assume the completely NOT SCARY but physically identical down to the boobs MAN living in the penthouse is...i guess one of the eco terrorists who was researching the stolen virus?
No idea. Also the creatures are shown to eat small animals but Patient Zero Zombie dude lives in an apartment furnished almost entirely by rodent cages packed full of live, healthy rodents.
No sense is ever made of this.
Nor is any sense made of the recordings Angela and Scott play, of moaning voices which might be a real voice slowed down. That moment didn't need to exist but its there. In the original the recordings are the old priests diaries regarding his study of the possession/virus, but in Quarantine, they're...noise.
It's fucking pathetic, frankly, that they even bothered remaking it, or that when they did they chose to copy so much without bothering to UNDERSTAND any of it.

Posted by: Nadine at May 18, 2010 9:19 AM

Please!, Rec was as scary as a cute bunny cavorting in a field of flowers.
The last horror film that scared me was Salem's Lot, and that was when I @13.
The whole film was boring, and not scary at all.
The fact that it was shot a la Cloverfield, made it worse, fucking cams do not make for a more authentic experience, they make for a more annoying one!
As for the parts with the nightvision-----meh!!!!!!!
I'd watch Descent any day over this drek.

Posted by: Stublore at May 19, 2010 6:44 PM