web
counter
 

Remembering The Godfather Part II with Francis Ford Coppola and Friends

By Drew Morton | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (18)



1265901_height370_width560.jpg

On Saturday, March 26th, the Directors Guild of America hosted another event in celebration of their 75th Anniversary. Last month, they honored George Lucas with a screening of Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope (1977) and discussion between Lucas and Christopher Nolan. This time, the DGA hosted a panel honoring Lucas’s benefactor, Francis Ford Coppola. Unlike the Lucas event, the DGA did not screen one of Coppola’s many feature films, but asked three directors, David O’Russell (Three Kings, The Fighter), Catherine Hardwicke (Twilight, Thirteen), and Paul Thomas Anderson (Boogie Nights, There Will Be Blood) to prepare short reels of some of their favorite scenes as a spring board for discussion. Each director’s selections were fairly classical while also featuring some oddities: Hardwicke picked ten minutes from Apocalypse Now (1979), P.T. Anderson chose a selection from The Conversation (1974), my personal favorite of Coppola’s films, and an odder choice, Youth Without Youth (2007), and O’Russell chose to honor Coppola’s UCLA student thesis film, the Richard Lester-esque You’re a Big Boy Now (1966) before favoring the obvious: The Godfather (1972) and The Godfather Part II (1974).

The filmmakers’ conversation, pun intended, was similar to the Lucas/Nolan Q&A in which classic stories were re-told by the aging but lively and deliciously self-effacing Coppola. He reminisced about cutting his name into “nudie” films while at UCLA and getting caught by the Dean, which prompted the school to post a sign reading “No Unauthorized Projects!” in the production wing of Melnitz Hall. He spoke about getting hired to helm the first Godfather (because he was Italian-American and because he was young) and nearly fired (executives hated the music, composed by Coppola’s father Carmine and Fellini collaborator Nino Rota, and the performers in the film), the chaos of making Apocalypse Now (chronicled in the great behind-the-scenes doc Hearts of Darkness: A Filmmaker’s Apocalypse, which I prefer to the film itself), and how the fiscal failure of the highly stylized One from the Heart (1982) put him on the path of filmmaking prostitution for nearly a decade as he paid off his debts. He even requested that the DGA screen a clip from the Robin Williams debacle Jack (1996), joking that we had to sit through the good and bad if we were to properly chronicle his career. Finally, he offered up his two biggest regrets as a filmmaker. The first was shooting One from the Heart as a film rather than utilizing the sets and technology he had orchestrated to give it the feel of a live television production. The second? Leaving the film industry in a worse position than when he found it. As he quipped, “We had the money and the power…Now, like most third-acts in a director’s life, we are doomed to the D.W. Griffith ending. Getting free drinks and telling young people that we used to be in pictures” (I may be slightly misquoting that).

Watching David O’Russell’s selections from the first two Godfather films, I began to realize what I really admired about Coppola’s work. While I love The Conversation, the power of the first two Godfather films comes from the structure they produce. The first film resonates more because of the second film and the second film only works because it builds off of and modifies what has come before. The Godfather Part II works as a sequel because it walks the line of the familiar and re-invention. The two clips O’Russell selected illustrates this perfectly. In The Godfather, Michael (Al Pacino) is an honorable Marine who is kept at arm’s length from his family’s illegal business practices by both himself and his father, Vito (Marlon Brando). He slowly sinks into the quick sand of organized crime when his brother, Sonny (James Caan), proves to be a hot headed leader. Michael solidifies his place in the mafia by killing Sollozzo (Al Lettieri) and the corrupt police Captain McCluskey (Sterling Hayden). In the scene, he reaches the bathroom of an Italian restaurant, grasps desperately for a gun that has been hidden by his associates, and returns to the dinner table that his two targets are eating at. Coppola focuses on Michael’s face, registering the fear, anger, and contemplation (it’s a prime piece of acting) and, as the clanking of the elevated train rises on the soundtrack, Michael performs the assassination. He does it for his father, as revenge for Sollozzo’s attempted assassination on Vito, and as a way to pave an easier road for his family.

Coppola rhymes this scene with young Vito’s (Robert De Niro) transformation in The Godfather Part II. An Italian immigrant in the early 1900s, Vito has begun his turn to organized crime in order to better the lives of his family. Scaling a rooftop during an Italian celebration, he stalks his prey, Don Fanucci (Gastone Moschin), rendered in a tense series of tracking shots. Again, the murder is far from graceful: Coppola makes us linger on the discomfort, the victim grasping at a gaping wound, a towel wrapped around the gun barrel starts on fire from the bullet’s ignition. Like Michael, Vito performs the assassination in the name of his family, holding the infant Michael in his arms after the deed and telling him “Your father loves you very much.”

Yet, the similarities between young Vito and Michael presented in The Godfather Part II are almost superficial. Admittedly, the film chronicles how both men rose to the throne of the same mafia family. However, the devil is in the details. By the end of The Godfather, Michael has gone from murdering in the name of his family to murder as a means of scaling the ladder of capitalism. The Godfather films depict a critical view of the American Dream in which capitalism is equated with murder and betrayal. In The Godfather Part II, Michael is shown as still going down this path and, by its conclusion, his ruthlessness has brought death to the very entity he initially sought to protect: his family. Vito’s actions are noble (his refusal to allow for narcotic trade on his turf in the first film is essentially the inciting incident), Michael’s only started off that way. The Godfather Part II, told via the timeless tradition of D.W. Griffith’s cross-cutting, is more of a study in contrast than it is in similarity and that is the film’s greatest strength.

The structure of The Godfather Part II also rhymes with that of the first film in other ways. The first film begins with a family wedding, a joyous celebration in which the elder Vito acknowledges the requests of his guests. The sequel, on the other hand, begins with a family celebration (Anthony Corleone’s First Communion) that slowly unravels before our eyes. The weak Fredo (wonderfully played by the late John Cazale) is incapable of “controlling” his drunkard wife while Vito’s favors have given way to Michael being extorted by the corrupt Senator Pat Geary (G.D. Spradlin). Like the first film, the narrative is essentially put into first gear by an assassination attempt on the head of the family. While the suspect and motives of the assassin in the first film are far from a mystery, we are left with several red herrings in The Godfather Part II. Could it have been Corleone capo Frank Pentangeli (Michael Gazzo)? Or Johnny Ola (Dominic Chianese, Junior Soprano from “The Sopranos”), right hand man to aging gangster Hyman Roth (Lee Strasberg)? Part II is much more of a mystery, as Michael attempts to piece together the conspiracy against his family.

The irony of The Godfather Part II is that Michael is pulled deeper and deeper into illegal activity while attempting to fly the flag of legitimation. He kills so he no longer has to kill; he uses profits to buy businesses that are unblemished by criminal dealings. The three-act structure of The Godfather saga, told across the three films, is the rise, fall, and attempted redemption of Michael Corleone. He commits his greatest sins in Godfather Part II, even greater than the murder and resulting alienation of his wife (Diane Keaton) and sister (Talia Shire) in the first film. The third film, weak for the obvious casting of Coppola’s daughter Sophia and an odd, incestuous subplot with Andy Garcia, tries to chronicle his redemption. Yet, Coppola and the aging Michael have one thing in common: giving too little, too late in The Godfather Part III (1990). The rhyming structure was there, but not the restraint of the first two. With Apocalypse Now and One from the Heart, Coppola slowly lost his ability to toe the line between form and content. While I have yet to see Youth without Youth or his most recent film, Tetro (2009), I still think he’ll get there, someday. The Coppola who appeared at the DGA on Saturday seemed to realize his limits, his strengths and his faults, and, most importantly, showed a unquenchable thirst for the cinema. I hope his struggle to rise again does not mirror that of Michael Corleone’s; the American cinema needs Coppola back.

Drew Morton is a Ph.D. student in Cinema and Media Studies at the University of California-Los Angeles. His criticism and articles have previously appeared in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, the UWM Post, Flow, Mediascape, The Playlist, and Senses of Cinema. He is the 2008 and 2010 recipient of the Otis Ferguson Award for Critical Writing in Film Studies.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Three Musketeers Trailer: All For One, And One For What The F*ck? | If Zack Snyder Were Paid In Internet Opinions, Sucker Punch Would've Opened with $100 Million









Comments

The towel catching fire in Godfather Part II is probably my favorite moment in movie history.

Posted by: Todd at March 28, 2011 11:35 AM

I hear this is an ok film.

But...

REMAKE! REMAKE! REMAKE!

Channing Tatum as Michael. Please.

Zac Efron as Fredo. Please.

One of those pretty dudes who're playing one of those superheroes this (or any summer) as Young Vito. PLEASE!

Posted by: zeke the pig at March 28, 2011 11:47 AM

I refuse to see the third Godfather film as I want to keep the first two pure and unsullied. I got as far into III as Michael's letter to his children when he said "anyhow" and I knew it was going to be a debacle.

Mr. Julien actually recorded the Godfather movies onto audiocassette to listen to at work and once when I was watching II I heard, "poor Fredo" from another room as he knew from the music cue that Niri had just been given an order.

The Godfather movies are like The Wire: perfect Shakespearian or even Greek tragedies.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at March 28, 2011 11:53 AM

What a fantastic article. There's two scenes that always stick with me from those movies (both in Godfather II: the one where Fredo and Michael are at his house at the lake, and Fredo is yelling at Michael about how he's the older brother and doesn't deserve how Michael's treating him. And everything is lit very dimly, but you can see the silhouettes against the light from the window. Just thinking about that one gives me the chills.

The other is at the very end of the movie, the vignette with the family at the dinner table, gathering to celebrate Vito's birthday.

Posted by: figgy at March 28, 2011 12:01 PM

Since I love both of these films, all I can say is: DAMN YOU ROWLES!!

(Don't mind me. That's just the jealousy talking).

Posted by: Fredo at March 28, 2011 12:16 PM

And figgy, Fredo is on that awful chair with no proper support so he is flopping around. Coppola is a genius.

Since we're at it, my favourite scene in either movie is the testimony before Congress with the realistic lighting and Michael's exhausted appearance. To me it says that these people talk of honour and the family and hide behind some insular "code", but really they are nothing more than murderers and thugs. Not even Michael, who fancies himself a protector and some kind of gentlemanly throwback to a purer time, is above the essential truth of the situation: No matter the trappings of wealth, the proficiency of lawyers or the self-righteousness their statements, these people are scum.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at March 28, 2011 12:21 PM

I absolutely love The Godfather.

It has so many great moments and quotable lines.

When Pajiba recently asked which movies we can watch over and over The Godfather and Godfather Part 2 were at the top of my list.

Posted by: John W at March 28, 2011 12:34 PM

With my handle's surname, I of course enjoyed reading this.

If you haven't seen it, try to catch that documentary about John Cazale from a couple years ago (I Knew It Was You). It's a great portrait of an acting career that was tragically far too short.

For any Godfather fans who have not taken the time to listen to all three DVD commentaries that Coppola recorded, I highly recommend those too. It particularly enhanced my appreciation of the third film, which I have always felt is overly maligned, even if it is not the equal of the prior two installments.

figgy >> The second scene you mention, i.e., the film's closer, is a standout for me too. It's very serendipitous how it came to be, if you don't happen to know that story (included on aforementioned commentary). Brando wanted more money than the studio was willing to give, or he would have been included in that scene. The result was adjusted to accommodate his absence. It gives us the rest of the family happily greeting Vito offscreen and leaves Michael sitting alone by myself. That's a powerful visual metaphor.

Drew >> Off-topic and probably a fruitless question given the purpose of the event was to honor Coppola, but was there any mention of what the panelists are currently up to? I'm scrounging for a Paul Thomas Anderson update since that religious cult project of his got shelved.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at March 28, 2011 1:54 PM

"The first film resonates more because of the second film and the second film only works because it builds off of and modifies what has come before."

I totally agree with this. I watched Parts I and II for the first time just a couple of months ago. After Part I, I wasn't sure what I thought about it. Sure, it was a "good" movie but it wasn't really what I expected and I just couldn't verbalize a coherent opinion of it. In fact, for a while I wasn't sure I wanted to bother with Part II. But, hoo boy, am I glad I did. They almost have to be seen together to make any sense of them.

What has stuck with me the most: When Michael shut the door on Kay towards the end of Part II (after her confession when she came to visit the kids and try to talk to Michael) it just nearly tore me apart. I guess I'm just naive, but I swear I never saw that coming.

Posted by: elsie at March 28, 2011 1:55 PM

Darth,

No mention of current work, both from Coppola or any panelist. Last I heard, I thought PT Anderson had a rich benefactor who was financing the film. Some heiress or something.

Posted by: Drew Morton at March 28, 2011 1:57 PM

They are fantastic commentaries, aren't they DarthCorleone? I love it in The Godfather commentary when Coppola explains that he liked to include a recipe in each of his movies and that's why Clemenza tells Michael how he is making the tomato sauce.

How about a Pajiba list of the best DVD commentaries? Godfather I and II, Good Will Hunting, Sideways...

My mum cannot understand why anyone would watch a movie more than once. I've never watched these films and not reveled in the virtuosity of virtually every element*. They always spark discussion.

*Except when Kay says "It was an abortion. An abortion, Michael. Just like our marriage is an abortion." Histrionic much? I hate that line and am tempted to mute it when I watch. NOBODY talks like that and Diane Keaton's line reading is bad enough to suggest she felt the same way.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at March 28, 2011 2:22 PM

It was such a powerful visual metaphor, in fact, that it caused me to type "myself" instead of "himself." No, I'm not secretly Al Pacino.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at March 28, 2011 2:23 PM

Mrs. Julien >> Yeah, they are great. The overall impression that I got from them is just how humble and down-to-earth Coppola is. It's strikingly ordinary how so many individual elements of these great films came together, but taken as a whole they are an impressive labor of love on the part of Coppola and his many collaborators.

Now that DVDs are dying off and we're moving toward streaming media, I wonder if the art of the good film commentary is going to suffer as a result. The Internet gives us so much ability to hype and receive behind-the-scenes treatment in via featurettes before the films are even released, that I feel like that might also cut into the demand for them.

That abortion scene never struck me as off as it does you. I feel that Kay must have internalized so much resentment over the years over what Michael was doing with their lives that a histrionic lashing out like that seems plausible. After suppressing and bending so much to his way, she needed to finally consciously hurt him, and that seemed an effective way of doing it.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at March 28, 2011 2:33 PM

My two favorite movies of all time! Although I think II is slightly better, if for no other reason than the overwhelming sense of foreboding that is present. Also I love the contrast between the two weddings. The old world motif versus the tacky "Americanized" version. Especially the part where Frank Pentangili tries to get the band to play a song that was featured in the first movie and they didn't know it.

Posted by: TheBlackMenace at March 28, 2011 6:10 PM

Great read. Pacino and Cazale (great in everything) were fan-fucking-tastic in the first two films.

Posted by: Snrub at March 28, 2011 6:17 PM

These films always throw me in the minority, though I should stipulate that I don't dislike them, I'm just not in love with them. I should clarify that I went some twenty odd years without ever seeing them and have heard about them forever. Because of course I have, they are classics. From a cinema perspective I can easily recognize this, the camera work, the haunting music, the fabulous lines that I had never even known some of which came from this pair of movies. But for whatever reasons it never connected with me in the way I hear other people talk about all the time. I bought both of them on dvd probably 4 years ago, and watched them in one sitting, and just thought okay that was a pretty good movie and that was it. I assume had I been watching them once or twice a year like a lot of people, or even half the amount of times I've watched anything that was in my list from last week, my opinion would be different. So with that in mind, this thread has already set in motion the plan to set aside the time to watch them together and see what happens.

However, I did the same thing with Scarface and I fucking hate that movie. I accept that other people seem to like it/love it. But they should accept that I don't have to feel the same way. In the same vein of something being considered a classic and its just expected that everyone has seen it and loved it, that holds true for quite a lot of films with me. I usually don't point them out until someone says "hey, you tell them, what did you think of ________? they don't believe me." I typically am of no use to those people, its almost always to opposite response they were looking for. Which with my initial sarcastic responses to just about anything anyone says, it goes over like I was joking anyway.

Posted by: protoformX at March 28, 2011 8:13 PM

I think I O-ed while reading this, Morton. Good job!

I love how this brought out all the Godfather lovers. My favorite scenes actually involve seeing how the Godfather became the Godfather, as a young father struggling to support his family. I love how loyal he is to his wife (it's quiet in the film, there's a bit more in the books).

Mr. Snuggle and I can just start quoting either of these movies at any point and the other person can do the corresponding lines. We wore out two VHS tapes and we're on our second set of DVDs. In other words, much love.

I think Sonny was misunderstood.

Posted by: Snuggiepants at March 28, 2011 11:51 PM

I've toned down my beer snob proclivities over the years and I'm more of a live-and-let-live kind of guy now. It helps that I live in Madison, WI and the options available to me are much better than in most places. I no longer will drink light beers as I tend to get an upset stomach - I think the last Miller Lite I tried was a year ago before an outdoor hockey game. But I'll still occasionally have a PBR or a Budweiser. They don't taste very good to me compared to a New Glarus or Lake Louie micro and I wouldn't buy one myself but I wouldn't turn one down if offered.
My favorite new trend is micros in cans - perfect for a tailgate, camping or canoeing. I always felt weird about bringing a cooler of bottles to a Cubs-Brewers game at Miller Park, but now I can get a twelver of Dave's BrewFarm lager (an excellent micro from Wilson, WI) or Capital Brewery's US Pale Ale and rock the soft-side cooler on the bus over. Perfection!

Posted by: cosplay wigs at April 1, 2011 5:01 AM