web
counter
 

Pest? More Like Future Reprobate.

By Agent Bedhead | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (27)



ramonabeezus1sm.jpg

In the midst of July-borne heat, there’s one thing that any movie — particularly a G-rated one — shouldn’t do, which is to depress the living hell out of its audience. This is an inexcusable outcome for what should have been a feel-good summer movie for girls and their nostalgic-minded mothers, most of whom have harbored fondness for author Beverly Cleary’s novelized family from Klickitat Street. Now, consider this a mild spoiler warning for what follows, although it seems useless to provide such a warning with an adaptation of books that’ve been in print for several decades and continue to be widely read during elementary school story times.

With Ramona and Beezus, the filmmakers have not merely adapted the first novel, Beezus and Ramona, in Cleary’s series. Instead, this movie is a dumping ground for various misdeeds from several books, including Ramona and Her Father, Ramona and Her Mother, Ramona Quimby, Age 8, Ramona Forever, and Ramona’s World. Onscreen, the cumulative effect appears choppy and sitcom-ish, but at least the filmmakers have guaranteed to a virtual certainty that there won’t be any future jaunts by Ramona in a theater near you. And although I’m relieved that these are not franchise-minded filmmakers, there’s a more troubling result of the blended-up Quimby family history. Here, the “nine-years and three-months old” Ramona (played with impotent gusto by Joey King) engages in behavior that was better suited for her four-year old self. So, she comes off onscreen as much less of a pest and more of an ADHD-afflicted mascot for the Adderall crowd. Further complicating matters are director Elizabeth Allen’s execution of misguided CGI live-action sequences which, presumably, are meant to lead us into Ramona’s overactive imagination. Once again, the age factor complicates matters, for many of these sequences come from the mind of younger Ramona, whose movie counterpart reenacts them as a fourth grader. Now, this child is obviously not mentally retarded, but one could be forgiven for thinking so while watching a gleefully unaware Ramona parachute (in slow motion, no less) through a cotton-ball filled sky while “Walking on Sunshine” blares in the background. In other words, we’re witnessing a future reprobate instead of the spunky, misunderstood middle child beloved by several generations of young girls.

The movie’s pacing also misses the mark. As is typical of contemporary movie adaptations of beloved classics, the best moments are utterly wasted as a matter of promptly direct course. Sure, there’s Ramona’s defiant, dinner-table battle cry of “Guts, guts, guts!” as well as her act of squeezing an entire tube of toothpaste into the bathroom sink, but this all takes place within the first ten minutes. Then, the audience can look forward to another 90+ minutes of serialized zany antics, which are punctuated by the preoccupied Quimby parents (John Corbett, basically reacting to Ramona as he does to “Tara,” and Bridget Moynahan, essentially a pair of eyebrows), who briefly stop muttering about Dad’s newfound unemployment to shake their heads as if to remark, “Oh, that Ramona!” And since Ramona receives no more depth than a 3 ring circus, it’s nearly impossible to feel empathy for the character, which makes for too many awkward audience moments when the depressing shit kicks into gear. This is particularly the case when, right in the middle of the movie, the family cat, Picky Picky, dies. Since mom and dad are both away, the Ramona and Beezus (Selena Gomez, who’s a bit too — how do you say — Latino to serve as a credible Quimby) bury and memorialize their cat all by themselves. While the importance of this scene shouldn’t be underscored in terms of sisterly bonding, the film never really moves back into jovial territory. The plot merely moves forth onto Ramona’s next mess-up, but the sadness continues to linger.

Within the already cluttered landscape of Ramona and Beezus, several subplots are crammed in as well. Inexplicable importance is placed upon the presence of Josh Duhamel (A little something for da ladies? Not bloody likely.) as next-door neighbor Hobart, who puts the moves on Ramona’s Aunt Bea (Gennifer Goodwin) by popping “Eternal Flame” in the cassette deck. Meanwhile, Beezus heats up her romance with Henry Huggins (Hutch Dano) while speaking French to sound more sophisticated, which brings me back to the obvious miscasting of Gomez in this movie. Are we supposed to believe Selena Gomez could be the product of a sweaty exchange of bodily fluids between Corbett and Moynahan’s eyebrows of doom? Presumably so, but it’s quite telling that Disney Channel’s “Wizards of Waverly Place,” places great emphasis on the titular wizard family’s mixed heritage (that is, a fat white guy married to a slightly ravishing Latino woman), which puts any questions to rest about Gomez’s presence as one of the siblings. In this movie, it’s fairly obvious that Gomez was cast only for her name recognition amongst tweeners; yet Gomez distracts enough to cause lingering questions about Beezus’ parentage, which if anything, functions as just more evidence that this movie doesn’t provide compelling enough material on its own.

For all of the whimsical, anecdotal moments within Ramona and Beezus, director Allen sure manages to inspire absolute inertia in its execution. This adaptation will neither impress fans of Cleary’s work, nor will it inspire those few children who are unfamiliar with Ramona’s adventures to head to the library. Even the lone authentic connection to Cleary’s novels — provided late in the game when Ramona discovers some of her father’s sketches (which strongly resemble those of the original illustrators but are likely mere replicas) — don’t make a difference at all. Sorry Beverly Cleary, but Ramona Quimby is dead.

Agent Bedhead lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She and her little black heart can be found at agentbedhead.com.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The 20 May-Decemberiest Romances in Film | Dear God! | Trade News that Will Razz Your Berries









Comments

Not that I had any hope that this would be even slightly decent, but this still makes me sad.

Posted by: Jeni at July 26, 2010 2:09 PM

Having never heard of these books before, I thought the movie was called "Ramona and Bejeezus."

Posted by: BWeaves at July 26, 2010 2:14 PM

I'm glad the two dumped castoffs from Serendipity could come together and birth two awful moppets.

Posted by: Courtney at July 26, 2010 2:29 PM

“Walking on Sunshine” blares in the background.

ANOTHER ONE. Movies need to stop using that song RIGHT NOW.

What a great review of a stupid movie, Bedhead. I just loved reading it, even if I had absolutely no interest in the film.

Posted by: figgy at July 26, 2010 2:38 PM

TAMMY SMASH. What a wasted opportunity. Beverly Cleary, who is 94 and still writing(!), is a genius who created a decade's worth of sequel material if the filmmakers were even remotely competent. I suppose I should consider that a blessing? Nope, SMASH.

**anyone remember the AWESOME PBS series about Ramona? Anyone? Bueller?

Posted by: Tammy at July 26, 2010 2:38 PM

The only way I listen to "Walking on Sunshine" is if it's being sung by Philip J. Fry. Other than that, GOOD DAY.

Posted by: Pinky McLadybits at July 26, 2010 2:39 PM

Yeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah. I knew they were going to fuck this up. It still makes me super sad though.

Posted by: JenVegas at July 26, 2010 3:02 PM

The best thing about this movie even existing is the fact that my husband - a 35 year old, great, hulking beast of a man - sat straight up in his recliner after seeing a commercial and yelled "WAIT! WHERE'S HENRY HIGGINS? Ramona was in the Henry Higgins books! And what the heck is a Beezus?" He then rattled off the list of books that involved Henry Higgins and seemed genuinely confused as to why the movie was not about Mr. Higgins.

It was a strange moment.

Posted by: ZombieNurse at July 26, 2010 3:07 PM

Yes, Pinky, that song is not to be sung otherwise

Posted by: VinKong at July 26, 2010 3:09 PM

Basically, Ramona is like the Urkle of the bookseries, an obnoxious but little used side character that gradually turned into the central focus of the book series, shoving Henry (the original focus), Ribsy and even Ramona's sister into the background. I haven't read the original books in decades but I still have fond memories of them.

Posted by: Irving Washington at July 26, 2010 3:35 PM

Bedhead's comments about Beezus seeming peculiarly Latino remind me of another bad movie: National Lampoon's Vegas Vacation, which was run on cable often in the late 90s and early 2000s (hence why I have seen it, not that it's any excuse) and which starred Marisol Nichols as Audrey. And even though those movies rotate out Audrey and Rusty for every installment, I couldn't get past how clearly Latino she looked and sounded despite being the supposed offspring of Chevy Chase and Beverly D'Angelo.

Colorblind casting can work, just not when it seems to defy genetics.

Posted by: Drew at July 26, 2010 3:46 PM

Bev's books were among the first that i started reading when I was young, and I also found some of the old made for tv movies that whatever random publication group did, and I loved those, well, almost, they didn't go succiently with Romona's world, but they were good.

That being said........I want to know why Hollywood would even think of trying to make a classic into....a shambling, rambling, piece of trash. What, did they tell Clearly, "Give us the rights, we'll do it well?" and then sham her to pieces? She's an Oregonian by birth, I'm an Oregonian 9 months out of the year, and this to me as someone who lives Oregon and the state that produced Dear Beverly, is an outrage.

I'm gonna go see it anyway, just to judge it on how bad it is.

Posted by: LordNinja at July 26, 2010 3:53 PM

What possible CGI could they need for this movie? Did they need it to change the glances of the male extras who were eye-humping Selena Gomez?

Posted by: Jim Doggie at July 26, 2010 4:20 PM

WAIT, WHERE'S HENRY HIGGINS?
I didn't realize he was in those books. I'm pretty sure Ramona and Beezus's parents would be concerned if their daughters were hanging around an elderly British man who was offering them "language lessons".

Posted by: Jim Doggie at July 26, 2010 4:28 PM

I cannot believe I'm commenting on this, however, it is Henry Huggins in the Cleary novels. I have three little girls and I'm trying to impart some of my childhood by reading the books to them. Henry Higgins is the lead in My Fair Lady....which I've never seen...ever...

Posted by: DrZaius at July 26, 2010 4:47 PM

My friends live on Klickitat street here in Portland. How effing cool is that?
Also, STOP MAKING CRAP MOVIES OUT OF MY CHILDHOOD FAVES!!
Sorry to go all KANYE there, but it needed to be said.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at July 26, 2010 4:53 PM

Oh, it wasn't that bad. But I will admit that my mom bud and I cried like biddies after the cat died. And we've decided our kids must be heartless because no one else shed a single tear! (True confession: We also bawled in Up.)

And the fat white guy in Wizards of Waverly Place is supposed to be Italian...Russo.

Posted by: merandmamom at July 26, 2010 6:00 PM

They originally wanted Miley to play Beezus. Try to envision that.

Posted by: Wembley at July 26, 2010 9:28 PM

I always wanted to clap Amelia Bedelia across the mouth.

Posted by: Jo 'Mama' Besser at July 26, 2010 10:31 PM

merandmamom- Who didn't cry within the first 6 minutes of Up?

Those people are dead inside and go on to make movies that suck the soul out of children's literature.

Posted by: Cabbage at July 26, 2010 10:43 PM

Who didn't cry within the first 6 minutes of Up?

Up was an uninflated Disney hackwork, now Jonah Hex, that was a masterpiece of cinema. Megan Fox shows the whole world how to be the piecce de resistiance of actress working.

Posted by: Armond White at July 27, 2010 2:17 AM

I'm actually glad this sucked, because now I won't see it, and the books can live on in my head. I loved them as a kid, and don't want anything challenging that nice memory. Which is also why I won't be re-reading them.

Posted by: nolalola26 at July 27, 2010 4:03 PM

I vaguely remember the books and that will continue

Posted by: Candy at July 27, 2010 11:19 PM

As usual, Pajiba is white as fff.

Selena Gonzalez is too Latina guys. This goes up there with Rowles being totally confused about why Chris Rock was making a documentary about black women's hair.

Way to show off how lily white you can be.

Posted by: Mexcillent at July 28, 2010 1:47 PM

I don't really care whether Ms. Gomez is too Latina or whatever. But I do think that she is too good-looking to play the role of Beezus. The character in the book was awkward and had acne, Selena Gomez is too flawless. What's next casting Taylor Lautner as Super Fudge? Come on...

Posted by: TrophyWife at July 29, 2010 12:02 PM

Are you kidding me? This movie was outstanding! Well done, simple and sweet, with actors that performed exceptionally well. I would go back to see it again. These reviewers are people who probably have no connection to real people, and would rather game online and have strange fascinations with graphic animation that neither portrays real human relationships as they are nor raw human emotion. Ramona and Beezus was a great movie that demonstrates the power of love and importance for individuality...with very little use of computer animation.

Posted by: Millie at August 2, 2010 9:25 AM

I agree with Millie - my husband and I sat and watched this movie for the first time tonight. I read most of the Ramona and Beezus books, and my husband was a Henry Huggins fan, so we both love Beverly Cleary's books. We found this movie delightful - we laughed - we cried, we related with these characters - and the movie was a great adaptation putting the characters at ages that made the books work. Ramona had a fabulous imagination, and we, as adults, still do, so had no problem with Ramona's active imagination. It is a film we would definitely recommend. It is a feel good movie and we give it a thumbs up.

Posted by: Janet S at January 1, 2011 10:59 PM