free counter with statistics Pursuit of Happyness, The | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

happyness.jpg

I Am Will Smith’s Bitch

The Pursuit of Happyness / Dustin Rowles

Film Reviews | December 26, 2006 | Comments (86)


My critical abilities have been completely clusterfucked by The Pursuit of Happyness. Lookit: I recognized all the characteristics of a mediocre film — one that manipulates with all the subtlety of Tenacious D’s “Fuck Her Gently” — but, honestly, I didn’t give a shit. I allowed myself to be worked over like Perez Hilton at Surprise Celebrity Coming-Out Party by the wily charms of Will Smith and the tender onscreen chemistry he has with his real-life son. Hell, I knew what was coming — it was all right there in the goddamn trailer. But I still allowed myself to be blindsided and whipped about the head and face by enough swelling music and saccharine to kill an army of lab rats (I mean, c’mon: “Bridge Over Troubled Water”? How long can you get?). There isn’t an original, inventive, or organic moment in the entire film, yet I still had to suck my liquid heart out of the puddle on the floor with a stirrer straw. I think Letterman said it best when he noted last night about The Pursuit of Happyness: “Your stomach will be jerked up out of you through your nose … you will be sobbing and blubbering like a duck.”

It’s not a proud day for me, folks. I got played like a motherfucking Old Crow wagon wheel (My baby plays the guitar. I pick a banjo now.) I got burned like a Britney Spears’ toddler hovering around mom during a Ketel One-and-Marlboro binge. My dignity was ripped away from me faster than Brad Pitt’s control of his relationship three days after Angie gave it up. I got hosed, Tommy. Hosed.

I am Will Smith’s bitch, y’all.

Will Smith plays Chris Gardner, a down-on-his-luck good guy circa 1981 (evidenced by the porn ‘fro). He’s plowed his entire life savings into a medical instrument — a bone density scanner that he carries around miserably like Atlas carries the heavens. He’s dirt-poor and his breadwinning double-shift-working waitress of a dragon-lady wife (Thandie Newton) has left him to raise his son, Christopher. (Jaden Smith is decent, if only on account of the cute factor.) Gardner, via some lame plot contrivances (a chance encounter at a parking meter and, later, the ability to solve a Rubik’s cube) is also working an unpaid internship as a stockbroker at Dean Witter. He’s struggling to sustain life as a medical instrument salesman, pay rent on his apartment and, later, a fleabag motel. But rock bottom ain’t even on the horizon yet — that doesn’t arrive until the IRS seizes his few remaining dollars, forcing Chris and his son to resort to a homeless shelter, right after having spent the night in a subway bathroom (and if you’re not blubbering here, you’re going to need that lobotomy reversed, you emotionally crippled twit. What the hell is wrong with you, tough guy? C’mon — let it out. It’s very cathartic.).

There are a lot of problems with The Pursuit of Happyness, to be sure. It’s slow at times, and director Gabriele Muccino’s need to explore each and every one of Gardner’s hardships on his way to moneyed salvation gets a little ridiculous. We get it; we know — he’s poor, he can’t pay cab fares, and he really loves his kid. Not to mention the film’s largest thematic flaw: That “happyness” only comes with a big job as a stockbroker and the attendant salary (wealth comes with its own miseries, I’m sure — though you’d have to ask someone better qualified to make that assessment). Muccino also fails to take advantage of many opportunities in the storyline to explore issues of social mobility — there must be a certain level of discomfort for Gardner commuting back and forth to a homeless shelter and then spending his day with a bunch of golf-playing, millionaire geezers. But you’d never really know it from the film.

But the narrative, the endless array of insurmountable obstacles, and the feel-good conclusion aren’t really what pushes The Pursuit of Happyness deep (really, really deep) into Capra territory. It’s Will Smith, who has always had the ability to make a bad film watchable (e.g., Hitch, Bad Boys, and The Legend of Bagger Vance, a horrible film that can still bring you to tears if you’ve smoked enough reefer). In fact, in the two-and-a-half years I’ve been writing reviews, I’ve never once used this movie-critic cliché, but it’s warranted here: Smith gives a motherfucking tour-de-force performance. He has shed his obnoxious (though always charming) braggadocio and infused Chris Gardner with Smith’s own charismatic veneer, which bubbles beneath with sweaty, heartbreaking vulnerability. Indeed, Smith’s presence seeps into your soul and clings to you like secondhand smoke in a Vegas casino or, in my case, renders you speechless, fumbling around for terrible analogies that don’t properly afford Will Smith the admiration he deserves for this role. It is achy and sweet and patient and lovely and … kind of healing, in a way.

Of course, this is the downside to a review website that eschews advance screenings: We run home and write reviews on a ~ two-hour deadline while the emotions are still raw, before our critical faculties kick into full gear and reason infects our senses. So, I’m still riding the kind of cheap high (and brain-cell death) aroused by inspired-by-true stories and whippets, and I have no doubt that once it dissipates I’m going to be embarrassed with myself. I’m already starting to reflect on the many cracks in the narrative, the six-too-many cutesy coincidences, and the superfluous homeless man, whose belief that the bone density scanner is a time machine creates an insufferably adorable scene between Gardner and his son. But fuck it; I’m going to coast on this cinematic nitrous while I can, because I’m a sucker for single-father films where the kid offers both motivation and purpose. What can I say? It hits awfully close to home. Please, excuse the effusion.

So, go ahead, Pajibers. I will hit this publish button and hide behind a castle wall. Lob your stones. Call me a nancy-boy. A big honkin’ ninny. Cite the lack of bitchiness. Say I’m an unprofessional fuckwit who let a big, manipulative studio film get the best of me. I don’t care. I am Will Smith’s bitch. And, for the moment at least, I’m OK with that.

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. He is currently halfway through a three-year ‘sentence’ in upstate, NY, where he lives with his wife. You may email him, or leave a comment below.


Black Christmas | Rocky Balboa



Comments

The meeting at the parking meter isn't a plot contrivance. It actually happened in real life (although in a parking lot, not on the street).

Posted by: Johnny at December 15, 2006 4:12 PM

Bitch!

Just kidding. Long live the Will (although I won't be seeing this. I learned my lesson with sad sappy holiday movies last year, with thhe SJP flick.)

Posted by: that bees chick at December 15, 2006 4:14 PM

who am i to judge when the trailer alone brings me to tears?

well played dustin, well played indeed.

Posted by: cris at December 15, 2006 4:18 PM

It's all right, Dustin. I'll feel the same way after I see it. I am Will Smith's bitch as well.

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at December 15, 2006 4:21 PM

No stone throwing here-- I saw the trailer before a showing of "Stranger Than Fiction" and I had to pretend there was something stuck in my eye.

Posted by: Jenn at December 15, 2006 4:25 PM

I cried at Bad Boys.

Can't even imagine what this movie will do to me. Better see it alone.

Posted by: Kevin at December 15, 2006 4:33 PM

Dustin, you're not an unprofessional fuckwit who let a big, manipulative studio film get the best of you. If you were then I wouldn't come here for reviews.

And I'm fine with you being Will Smith's bitch.

Posted by: Jorge at December 15, 2006 4:36 PM

Oh you're all a bunch of pansies! The TRAILER puts a tear in your eye? For shame, pajibers. For SHAME!

"The Pursuit of Happyness (sic)" sounds like the male Titanic. I, for one, was pissed off as hell at how manipulated I felt by Titanic, so I'm staying away from this one.

Will Smith, if you ask me, can suck it.

Happy Festivus, bitches!

(Humbug!)

;-)

Posted by: Armando at December 15, 2006 4:38 PM

spending his day with a bunch of golf-playing, millionaire geysers.

I'm sure they do blow a lot of hot water.

Author's Note: Ha Ha! Noted. Corrected.

Posted by: z.h. at December 15, 2006 5:19 PM

Saw a trailer for this when I went to see Bond. I laughed, the guy I was with was moved. Seriously. What is it with men and Will Smith? Looks like a pile of steaming crap to me.

Posted by: Rachael at December 15, 2006 5:21 PM

This one is going to get me, but I'm attributing it partly to the fact that I'm familiar with the true story. I heard this guy speak and it is POWERFUL. I get so tired of people playing the victim card and lying down so that life can steamroll over them. Fight for it! And for God's sake, if you have children, FIGHT FOR THEM.

I hope this makes my husband all mushy like it did you, Dustin. That would kind of turn me on :)

Posted by: superedna at December 15, 2006 5:37 PM

Maybe I'm immune because I'm gay, but I've never seen the appeal of Will Smith. But I think you're right, Rachael. I've wondered why straight men feel the way they do about him. I guarantee I could call any one of my straight male friends and they would defend him to the bitter end. And God forbid you should make any disparaging remarks about his tv show. You'd think the magic would fade after awhile, but no, they keep right on defending him and watching reruns of that God-awful mess. Ridiculous.

I'm disappointed in you Dustin, for exacerbating an already irritating situation. You should know better. And you people quit defending him. He needs to learn his lesson. :)

Posted by: Smokin at December 15, 2006 5:39 PM

Dustin,
It's OK that you were moved. After all, here is a rags-to-riches, pull-at-the-heartstrings American tale that is TRUE :) So, suddenly, we cynical souls can again believe in the feel-good cliches our culture fed us as children.

P.S. Does anyone else still find the "Fresh Prince of Belair" theme song randomly popping into their head from time to time? "Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiin West Philadelphia, born and raised, well the playground was where I spent most of my days...."

Posted by: Love you, Dustin at December 15, 2006 5:59 PM

Once again, Will Smith doing what else? Well Will Smith of course. Sorry but I'm on a personal crusade, this people are NOT actors, they are personalities doing what almost amounts to schtick.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 15, 2006 6:01 PM

And ugh, Thandie FUCKING Newton gawd, what a steaming pile of shit.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 15, 2006 6:03 PM

Or was it, "the playground was where I'd spend most of my day"? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm....

Posted by: Love you, Dustin at December 15, 2006 6:12 PM

I will probably be eviscerated for this comment, but what the heck. I don't mind actors who are "personalities" BarbadoSlim, (I have always wanted to mention how much I like your screen name, you ebony god, you, and how I wish that I had thought of it first).

If a charismatic actor who lacks versatility is well cast, I don't think it detracts from the whole. It can actually enhance a picture if they bring baggage from other performances with them, say to throw an audience member off of a twist in the narrative.

Posted by: ecp at December 15, 2006 6:17 PM

Appreciate the compliment ecp.

With regard to personalities, you hit the nail right on the head. The film has to right for the schtick. I know for a fact that Smith can act , he did that film, Six Degrees of Separation where he really immersed himself in the character. However, somewhere along the line (ID4), he decided it'd be easier to just recycle some variation of the Fresh Prince on EVERY. FUCKING. MOVIE.('cept Ali)

As an Asimov fan I can never forgive the travesty that was I Robot.

And don't even get me started on Thandie Newton

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 15, 2006 6:31 PM

I like Will Smith and, yes, I did too almost brought to tears by the trailer of the movie. I think he is an ctor that can let you feel what he feels. He's open. There are a lot of actors who just does wierd roles and just play "pretend" and there are many more who thinks that's acting. But, will smith does let you feel like you are seeing a raw human being. And I'm sucker for that.

As for some actors who only plays himself, ask yourslef, do you ever get tired for more than a year of seeing Robert De Niro playing De Niro? Or Jack Nicholson? or Denzel Washington? There are something very raw about playing yourself, or rather, playing a part of you that is in everyone else.

Posted by: YOCEAN at December 15, 2006 6:35 PM

I appreciate that you, of all critics, can admit to being swept up in an emotional rollercoaster. To some extent, it's what film/cinema/theatre/literature--all art, I guess--is really about. Why do we always insist on using our reasonable faculties when it comes to a performance? (Unless it's a Paul Haggis piece we're talking about, that is.) So, kudos.

Posted by: pseudoliterati at December 15, 2006 7:28 PM

This looks so stomach turningly awful! I'm always suspicious of "based on true"... anything stories. I have no problem letting movies carry me away and I often forgive a lot if the story and characters are interesting but this looks way, way too contrived and manipulative. If I hadn't seen this trailer... I might have been sucked in but
a) He solves the Rubik's cube to impress someone? Really? They thought that was a good idea? That single moment in the trailer told me this was a movie to miss.
b) Will's acting with his son, isn't that s... tupid, poor kid. I'm sure it's supposed to make we want to see it even more but no, less it is
c) the name is lame, "Happyness", arrrrrrggggh.

I refuse to see it.

I will say this, the review was very helpful because even though you enjoyed it and got caught up you laid out the flaws you knew were there and now I can use that knowledge.

Posted by: Nooken at December 15, 2006 8:04 PM

" I got burned like a Britney Spears' toddler hovering around mom during a Kettle-One-and-Marlboro binge. "

Do you mean Ketel One? Or am I missing something white-trashy?

Posted by: JJ at December 15, 2006 8:09 PM

The trailer for this and Marshall had me crying in the theater with the lights on (but not talking to the screen-so leave me the fuck alone already). It was shameful really.

I'm stunned by the review but not judgmental. Maybe it's the holidays that's made the reviewer go soft.

Posted by: anikitty at December 15, 2006 8:32 PM

who remembers that time on the Fresh Prince when Will got into Princeton (or something) by solving a Rubik's Cube real fast??? remember? and Carlton couldn't do it? oh, memories.

Posted by: v at December 15, 2006 9:01 PM

I'd like to add something regarding what somone posted up there about films "based" on a true story. No such "luck" here this one is "INSPIRED" by a true story. So basically this is just one step away from "we kept the names and made some shit up."

And another thing, leave your frakin' kid home. Nepotism sucks, and should not be endorsed. I just KNOW he forced the studio to hire the kid.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 15, 2006 9:19 PM

dreamgirls.... now!!!!!!!

Posted by: copter at December 15, 2006 10:16 PM

dreamgirls.... now!!!!!!!

Posted by: copter at December 15, 2006 10:17 PM

Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiin West Philadelphia, born and raised, on the playground is where I spend most of my days, chillin out, maxin, relaxin all cool and shootin some b-ball outside after school...

Shutting up now.

I think there's something really cute and earnest about Will Smith...I don't know, I've always liked the guy. I'm not totally his bitch--I'm pretty much Ewan McGregor's bitch until the day I die, since I see no matter what he makes, good or bad--but I see where Dustin's coming from. I have to say, though, I think the TV show kinda adds to the appeal. In a way.

Also, yeah, it kinda looks like it has potential to be crappy, but eh, my coal heart has to pump out real blood once in a while.

Posted by: em at December 15, 2006 11:46 PM

I've never seen any of her movies before, so I haven't formed any kind of opinion about Thandie Newton. I'm seeing a lot ragemonkey, here? Is she bad, or is she just in bad movies (there's probably a reason I haven't bothered to see anything she's done)?

Posted by: M at December 16, 2006 1:46 AM

His son kinda looks like Wanda Sykes, huh?

Posted by: M at December 16, 2006 1:54 AM

Like the reviewer, I'm posting this shortly after seeing the film. Unlike the reviewer, I was not won over by Will Smith's performance.

The Pursuit of Happyness is... boring, in a word. It was very hard to sympathize with the character because I couldn't connect with him. He was too busy running everywhere and when he was talking with his son, it didn't seem so much like relationship-building as much as an opportunity to try and manipulate me into thinking that this is a touching movie.

I actually thought Thandie Newton's character was more sympathetic. She's not a bitch, like the trailers make her out to be. She's just tired, trying to hold everything together.

I'm going to try reading the book. I'd rather learn about Chris Gardner's story from Chris Gardner.

Posted by: fcprincesse at December 16, 2006 2:30 AM

Brought to tears by the trailer? That's insane. I cry at the drop of the hat, but this movie just made me roll my eyes and keep checking the time on my cellphone. And I cry when I see lost dog signs!!!

Posted by: Squarah at December 16, 2006 3:14 AM

" it didn't seem so much like relationship-building as much as an opportunity to try and manipulate me into thinking that this is a touching movie. "

Yes! Thank you!

Posted by: Squarah at December 16, 2006 3:15 AM

I'm with you, Squarah. I cry easily, yet I merely rolled my eyes at this one, too -- in my case, at the trailer, not the movie, which I will never see.

Posted by: Lily at December 16, 2006 8:41 AM

my sister and i both cried watching the trailer and i can't stop thinking about this annoying movie ever since.

Posted by: adrianne at December 16, 2006 12:28 PM

I think this is an insult to the people who actually go through intense periods of poverty and never really "make it". It's like giving those who suffer this false hope of success...this is not how it really is, and movie writers shouldn't pretend it is either when they write tripe like this...also, they should spell happiness correctly...really...!

Posted by: Gina at December 16, 2006 2:02 PM

"I think this is an insult to the people who actually go through intense periods of poverty and never really 'make it'. It's like giving those who suffer this false hope of success...this is not how it really is, and movie writers shouldn't pretend it is either when they write tripe like this...also, they should spell happiness correctly...really...!"

Though his story is probably an extreme case, this really did happen. The man who it's about was actually on the set making sure it didn't stray too far from the real thing (obviously some stuff had to change to make it fit into a movie). But this isn't some fairy tale. It did happen.

Posted by: Vida at December 16, 2006 2:18 PM

I'm on the fence about seeing this one in the theater, but I did also see the trailer for it at Stranger Than Fiction (which, I loved, and incidentally, made me cry at completely weird times), and thought it looked sappy, but not sickeningly so. My husband, on the other hand, sniffled, and I daresay he got teary-eyed, as he's often the one that's a total sucker for those types of movies. So we'll probably see it, and I don't mind because I do like Will Smith, despite some of the horrible movies he's been in (I, Robot, Wild West, etc.)

Posted by: zadzi at December 16, 2006 3:30 PM

Mood must be everything--or I need to sign up for one of those lobotomies. I snorted at the trailer (so did the bf and a buddy of ours), Will Smith has never "made a movie" for me and, overall, I'll believe it when I see it.

Which I won't.

There, Dustin--maybe I've bitchified this page a little for ya.

Posted by: ranylt at December 16, 2006 3:38 PM

I haven't seen the movie, but a review told me the reason it's spelled "Happyness" is because that's the name of a crummy daycare Will Smith's son goes to, and it kills him that they can't even spell the word right.

So burn on you, complainers! I'm going to be snotty about it to cover up my shame that I said the same thing about the movie before I knew the context.

Posted by: Grumblecakes at December 16, 2006 6:41 PM

This has nothing to do with the film, but... Thank you, Dustin, for introducing me to Old Crow Medicine Show. I can't thank you enough.

Posted by: Anne at December 17, 2006 8:26 AM

dustin or justin whatever you "name" is, you are a pussy.

Posted by: timi at December 17, 2006 1:06 PM

No more alone-time on the internet for you, timi!

Posted by: timi's Mom at December 17, 2006 3:22 PM

Is there some sort of clause in Will Smith's contract that every movie he's in has to contain a scene where he runs down a city street with an open button down shirt on and a white tank top underneath it?

Posted by: Chriso at December 17, 2006 3:37 PM

Chriso-I think you've uncovered something. I believe it's the "beater clause" and I'm sure that Eminem [sic?], Kid Rock, and now K-Fed are super pissed that he thought of it first. They've been sweating in their own damn tank tops. [or maybe I'm just typing nonsense again.]

Posted by: anikitty at December 17, 2006 5:01 PM

haha, love your similes, dustin.

Posted by: peace pipe at December 17, 2006 6:30 PM

Good lord. I started blubbering at the trailer to this - teared up at that shit TWICE. Then I found out my roommate, who has a heart of steel, did the same. I can't wait to see this shit.

Posted by: RMJ at December 18, 2006 2:21 AM


Here's the one thing that puzzled me. So, supposedly, the scanner was a failed business -- twice the price for only marginal improvement right?

However, by the end of the film, he had in fact sold all the scanners. His initial insight was correct...he was just capital starved. If he had the right investment in his business (such as his wife supporting him for a year or so) he may have been able to make good without being a stock broker.

In fact, since the early 1980s were the very prehistoric days of High Tech, he might have done very very well.

The other thing about that scanner (sorry, it fascinates me) is -- it was portable! That's right, just like the early Osborne portable computers, this was an X-ray type machine that you could carry.

So, I guess, in a way I of course feel sympathy for the guy, but not in a social or even emotional way. To me this film was sort of like Kafka's "The Trial" where everything that could go wrong for the guy, does go wrong. He's a victim not of the Capitalist System, but of the insane governmental bureaucracy and a lackluster marriage partner.

Posted by: John Bailo at December 18, 2006 5:34 AM

Not to seem like I'm taking the cynical, "Lewis Black" role on the Pajiba comments pages, but CRYING AT A TRAILER?!?!?!?!

COME ON, PEOPLE!!!!

Posted by: Armando at December 18, 2006 7:57 AM

The trailer bored me to tears.

Posted by: sp at December 18, 2006 9:06 AM

"This has nothing to do with the film, but... Thank you, Dustin, for introducing me to Old Crow Medicine Show. I can't thank you enough."

Anne - if you like those guys, might I recommend both Acoustic Syndicate and the Lazybirds, if you haven't discovered either of them already?

Posted by: mezzomom at December 18, 2006 9:52 AM

crap, dustin, i teared up at the fucking trailer too, and i was watching casino royale with my dad... damn you, willl smith. and yeah, you're spot on with his ability to make shite films kinda watchable. i mean, fuck, i've seen wild wild west three times. THREE TIMES! what the fuck is that about?

Posted by: johnny just come at December 18, 2006 11:40 AM

I have no desire to see this movie as I abhor Will Smith and everything he stands for. I can't tolerate the misspelling of happiness in the title; I'm sure it has some sort of cutesy explanation, but how many kids (and adults, no doubt) will spelling happiness with a Y due to this excreable film?

Posted by: mutterhals at December 18, 2006 11:59 AM

Mezzomom - Thanks, I've not heard of either of them before - I'll definately look them up. We don't have anything like your selection of 'country' (I hate the genres they put on them - how on earth can you sum up music like that when it's all so different?) music easily available here in the UK, so it's great to get tip offs like that :D

Posted by: Anne at December 18, 2006 12:08 PM

Thandie Newton's accent was AWFUL! She sounded like Rosie Perez. It was not good. But the movie was pretty good. I had no desire to see it but was dragged and I cried (the bathroom scene!!!) but it was hard for me to feel that bad for him. I mean, you are living in a bathroom or sleeping on a subway, how about you get a second job on the weekends? Or drop the internship until you aren't dragging your kid to homeless shelters everyday. The only thing that I think saved me from crying more was right at the "touching parts" the sound went out on our movie and some guy was like, "ok I'll be the kid someone be Will," so we were all laughing. Got a free movie pass out of it though!

Posted by: lyricalcatt at December 18, 2006 1:05 PM

What's a Thandie Newton? Is it related to Fig?

Posted by: satan's poolboy at December 18, 2006 3:09 PM

I cried a bit when I saw this trailer as well . . .but only because I was laughing so hard at yet another emotionally manipulative, overly sentimental waste of time.

=)

Happy Holidays!

Posted by: T at December 18, 2006 4:04 PM

Several people are bitching about the HappYness spelling - however, its relevance is explained in the film.

To the person above who mentioned the scanner - I'm pretty it's profitable when you're selling them on a regular basis, but he wasn't. However, considering he managed to sell a few while in his internship and on weekends; you have to wonder what he did all day if he only sold one every other month or so. Also - why didn't he have some other form of employment?

The trailer made me tear up a bit too, but the movie left me sort of blah. The story itself comes across as superficial. It glosses over several points of conflict (his separation, sort of vilification of his ex-wife - who actually seems quite interesting, his kid's schooling - hello! He's five and at day care?)

Oddly for a movie based on true events - there was a lot of required suspension of disbelief. (The way he was always clean and in suits and able to fed his kid - but they supposedly had no money, and are they trying to tell me that no one at DW was observant enough to catch on!?)

Of course it also beats us over the head with the father/son thing - which, really, isn't the most interesting thing here. Smith's kid wasn't very good, cuteness will only get you so far, and he wasn't really given much to work with anyway. Nevermind how annoyingly arrogant he came off as IRL interview (like on Regis).

I haven't had a chance to read Gardner's book, but I'm guessing this movie doesn't really do his story justice. He strikes me as a very ambitious man and I'm sure there a multitude of reasons to admire him, but this portrayal felt like one big arse kiss.

Posted by: Kara at December 18, 2006 4:16 PM

Dustin,

You big nancy-boy! Damn you and your tissue-thin hide! Getting all choked up like a fresh cabin boy in the foc'sle -- get ahold of yourself, man!

However, that said, Will Smith does have a curious ability to appeal to manly seafaring types like myself. I suspect its those waggly ears and the proper sartorial display of a wife-beater. Curse your Smith-blurred eyes, Dustin, now I'm getting all blubbery! Must concentrate on giant mechanical spider....

Posted by: Capn Gravy at December 18, 2006 9:18 PM

who remembers that time on the Fresh Prince when Will got into Princeton (or something) by solving a Rubik's Cube real fast??? remember? and Carlton couldn't do it? oh, memories.

v, that's exactly what I blurted out when I was watching the movie. I wondered if it was a shout out, or just laziness in writing, or a coincidence.

you have to wonder what he did all day if he only sold one every other month or so. Also - why didn't he have some other form of employment?

Kara, I asked myself that, too. I also asked the friend I saw it with tonight. I'm guessing some of that time was spent on unsuccessful sales calls. But if he had gotten a regular weekend job, something in retail or the service industry, he wouldn't have had to depend on selling those overpriced contraptions. He would have made enough money to find him and his kid a hotel room each week. I guess the real Chris Gardner could explain why he didn't get a real job, like cleaning or waiting tables. But I wasn't reading his book; I was watching Will Smith's movie. So the movie should have explained it.

Posted by: Bianca Reagan at December 19, 2006 3:52 AM

I totally agree about the irresitibility of Will Smith. He's totally gross, so cheesy, all his movies are B crap, his music is lame, and yet I can't help smiling and feeling an inner sense of well being like every time I see him. I want to see this movie really bad. How embarassing.

Also, whoever was ragging on Will's nepotism and betting that he forced the studio to cast his kid, I DOUBT it. I mean I'm sure he was all for the idea, but it's a TOTAL sales gimmick to have his real son in the movie, that alone will make people go see it. I'm sure the studio was all OVER it as soon as the realized the kid was a passing actor.

Posted by: Grace at December 19, 2006 2:53 PM

That was a beautiful review. He had me crying like a baby too. I was so PISSED. I KNEW it was a slow movie but that bathroom scene pushed me over the edge

Posted by: Will Smith's Ho at December 19, 2006 10:58 PM

Oh shut up you douchebags who refuse to not only watch the film, but criticize Dustin's review.

The Rubik's cube scene was something I anticipated, having been a Fresh-Prince fan growing up. And you'd have to look at it in the context also, since the movie was set in 1981 and people were having contests on how long it took to solve one. So no, it's not a stupid scene.

And the word "happyness," yes it's spelled wrong for a reason.

P.S. The movie is entertaining. Period.

Posted by: Diamond at December 20, 2006 1:15 AM

Oh thank God! I always prided myself on being truly dead inside, but I bawled like a bitch at this trailer. I count Bad Boys 2 as one of my favorite movies simply because, I too, am Will Smith's bitch. I still won't pay money to see this of course, but I definitely can guarantee that when it shows up in my Netflix queue that I will sob like the bitch I am. Sigh.

Posted by: MG at December 20, 2006 4:47 PM

fuck you i almost cried reading this review. i'm gonna have to fake dropping my water bottle the whole way through this movie.

Posted by: rx at December 20, 2006 9:12 PM

i just the pursuit of happyness...and i am also proud to be will smith's bitch.

Posted by: cris at December 20, 2006 9:59 PM

Gahhhh how can you buy into this film. While the French Princes acting is good, the movie and its message is unfortunate and disrespectful.

It portrays the poor,sick, and helpless as animals whos only redemption can be found in doing everything in their power to acheive material wealth.

Sure, Chris Gardner had incredible will-power and balls to do what he did but 99% of responsible parents would rather take ANY job and keep their children warm and safe than risk living on the streets for 6 months to try and land a 'respectable' job.

Go ahead and enjoy this movie but realise it has A LOT less to do with reality than it claims to.

Posted by: kt88 at December 20, 2006 11:06 PM

THE FRENCH PRINCE

ahah silly me.

Bonjour Jazzy Jeff!

Posted by: kt88 at December 20, 2006 11:07 PM

Will Smith is yummy

I am his bitch too

If only that bitch Jada would step back, yo

Nice review!

Posted by: Plobes at December 22, 2006 1:42 PM

HELP! someone please email me and tell me why happiness is spelled happyness??!! rhbird@aol.com. thank you!!!!!

Posted by: rhonda at December 22, 2006 4:36 PM

Happyness is spelled wrong on the sign of the daycare center where Will Smith's character takes his son everyday. The daycare center is run by Asians who don't speak English well - I guess that might imply that they can't spell well either?

Go see the movie. It's OK that it's not perfect. At least it makes you feel good, helps you to remember that there are there are good people in the world, and it might make you want to throw a few more coins in that Salvation Army bucket.

This movie is the polar opposite of that horrible movie that everyone loves - The Departed. I've decided that I'm not going to waste any more of my time and money watching people kill lots of other people. Life is just too short.

Posted by: suzy at December 23, 2006 1:06 AM

I think happiness is probably spelled wrong for more than one reason, and the fact that everyone is taking the time to talk about it is probably the most important one. It draws attention to the movie.

The only reason I ended up in this area to post is because I saw a small cbs clip where they were spelling the name of the movie and I thought it was a typo, then I kept seeing it over and over again. Of course, I checked the main website and yes, it was spelled that way. Why? well i think I just got my answer, I am not at all interested in seeing this movie, but it still got my attention and I ended up reading more about the movie because of my initial interest.

If you ask me, for being spelled wrong, it is actually pretty brilliant marketing.

Kudos to the marketing dept.

Posted by: viciouz at December 23, 2006 10:34 AM

Glad to see that the Pajibs is stepping up to the sappy movie plate... I say forgive yourself. Once in a while a movie will just bitch slap you into shortbus mode, but admitting you've been manhandled (ESPECIALLY by a Will Smith performance; has everyone forgotten Enemy of the State already? You KNOW that you can't put it down when flippin' the channels (ye olde Shawshankie grab!) is the first step to cynical country, and back to swaggering into a theatre with testosterony confidence once again. Your sensitivity chip is knee-jerking only because Will Smith can maintain THE cheese Kraftiest 80s-style panic-stricken face, ever. We fell in love then; it's okay to revisit the old flame now. Easy Dustin. Eaaaaaaaasy.

Posted by: Macademia Nut at December 23, 2006 7:09 PM

Um..if this question was already answered, my apologies. But - isn't 'happyness' supposed to be 'happiness'?

Posted by: Danielle at December 27, 2006 1:05 PM

i didn't want to see this, but got vetoed by my friends. it was an alright holiday underdog movie. but what really got my kudos was the fact that they actually carried the voice-over narrative throughout the film. most of the time, the main character just sets up the story and then disappears, which is just lazy storytelling (it's nit-picky, i know, but, damn). so, yay screenwriter for that detail.

Posted by: julia Getts at December 29, 2006 3:00 PM

The damn asians in the movie spell happiness wrong on his son's daycare door, and then make him watch "The love Boat" to educate him on the navy. (*chuckles* this part in the movie is crazy funny) I found the movie hilarious at times and heart-wrenching at others. I wasn't bored at all. But I have to admit, the kids pisses you off. And for that, he deserves and Oscar if this is really how the real guys kid actually acted. He was a brat! I was tempted to jump into the screen and smack him around the motel! When your kids get out of hand, beat them! All Smith's character did was say "stop!". but at one point, he grabs him and gives him that "You little f***er if you know whats good for you" tone, and drags him away. That was a good part of the movie too. I say, see it. It's great but you start to feel bad for the guy. Oh yeah, and the portable machine?? It provides a heaping of comic relief. Which you WILL need.

Posted by: Loni at December 29, 2006 3:31 PM

"And for that, he deserves and Oscar if this is really how the real guys kid actually acted. "

Sorry this is supposed to be, "And for that, he deserves an Oscar if this was how the real Christopher acted while his father was struggling."

Posted by: Loni at December 30, 2006 2:56 PM

Loni obviously doesn't know kids! Even good kids have meltdowns, and he was only 5!!! Besides, he redeems any brattiness in that one scene in the gas station when his father sees him looking at the candy bars, and his (the kid's) first reaction to "Do you want one?" is "No, it's ok." Heartbreaking.
Also, I've noticed that no one has really said anything about the "chapters" announced via voiceovers by Smith. I think it's important to note that at the end, when he's gotten the job, he says that "this little part right here is happiness." I think that this (plus the fact that there isn't any "after" filmage of new houses and expensive cars) contradicts what some have said about the movie giving the message that having material wealth is the road to happiness. I think the message was really that happiness is really in that brief moment when all of your *pursuit* pays off, and in this case was mostly a profound sense of relief for Gardner that he could finally provide for his son and that he'd attained something of the level of promise he'd shown earlier in his life. In the end, I really don't think it was about the money, even though most of the events seem to revolve around the absence of it.
I could go on and on...I think this movie appears to be slightly less complex than it really is, just because a lot of the dialogue gets subsumed by the high level of emotion and the seemingly simple rags-to-riches plot.

Posted by: M.M. at December 31, 2006 5:08 AM

I raised 5 kids from infancy, so dont say I dont know kids. Despite the candy bar incident, the boy still has his bratty moments in the movie, PERIOD. When he would start ging crazy and questioning Smith's character, everyone in the packed theater would begin to hiss and suck their teeth. IT WAS ANNOYING! If it didn't annoy you, thats fine, but don't tell me I don't know kids, I just don't take crap from the ones I take care of.

Posted by: Loni at January 1, 2007 7:18 PM

I walked out of the theater saying exactly the same thing: this is one I SHOULD have hated. It had all the ingredients I usually barf back up. But somehow all the flaws made the story real, and I completely forgot the real-life father-son chemistry--this pair made tht story alive. Only one minor disagreement. I definately felt the heavily veiled unease about suddenly rubbing elbows with the privledged. I think Will Smith conveyed that beautifully, subtly. Maybe because I've been there, done that. I'm glad the movie didn't have a scene to explain that.

Posted by: Old Enough at January 2, 2007 11:42 AM

Sure it was cheap, and you could literally feel the formula that the table of writers used to piece it together, but what impressed me was the thoroughly un-saccharine nature of the ending. What was it? Five seconds of happiness? And after the abundance of obstacles that had stressed me for the previous two hours, I could feel Gardner's happiness. Fo' real.

Posted by: Susie at January 3, 2007 8:43 PM

Danielle asked: Um..if this question was already answered, my apologies. But - isn't 'happyness' supposed to be 'happiness'?

Seriously. If you are trying to be funny, you lose. If you're just that unobservant - you still lose. Thank you for playing. You'll get no consolation prize.

Posted by: Kara at January 4, 2007 3:32 PM

Yes, I agree with anyone who said this movie is shit. because it is.
Its like babel, you dont give a fuck what happens for the characters. because you know Willy is going home to a million dollar bedroom.
What women is giving up her child like that and leaving out of the scene never to be seen again?

Hes an uncle tom, he should be giving away millions like Oprah.

Posted by: Klaus Kinski at January 7, 2007 7:03 PM

I think everyone here saying this movie is an insult, or a crap story is so wrong, baring in mind this is the REAL story of one mans life. It brought a tear to my eye watching a man and his five year old son spend the night in a public toilet. To me this story is so touching and I think it deserves the amazing reviews it got. I find it hard to think no one could be upset watching this film about a man and his upward battle through life, to protect his son, and find them both a better standard of living. I think the endong of this film, and the whole story is beautiful. This film is so deserving.

Posted by: loop at January 21, 2007 5:46 PM

heii a ilke ur move bye!
xoxo

Posted by: karime at January 23, 2007 9:49 AM

The mission of the your site.
cheap carisoprodol

Posted by: Thanasis at April 27, 2007 7:46 AM