web
counter
 

That Voodoo You Do So(rt of) Well

By Agent Bedhead | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (45)



princessfrog11sm.jpg

In a cinematic sense, there are few things more frustrating than not being able to wholeheartedly praise a movie that’s drawn with good intentions and brings back the mind-blowingness of classic 2D hand-drawn animation. It’s easy to love Disney’s The Princess and the Frog, but much of this affection results from the nostalgia of the movie’s visuals and an audience’s willingness to get lost in the rapture of the final act. To bring things into perspective, I must stress that the female protagonist, Tiana (Anika Noni Rose), starts out as an independent, hard-working woman but eventually loses her way and decides that, above all, the ultimate happiness comes from capturing the right man. It doesn’t even matter if this man is nothing but a ne’er do well slacker playboy, for love is simply enough to carry the day, and the rest falls into place. Perhaps even more exasperating, the movie promotes the notion that, if a woman so desires, she can change her man and transform him into the husband of her dreams. It’s such a terrible shame that Tiana’s work ethic — which was consistently encouraged by her late father, James (Terrence Howard) — can so easily be toppled when Tiana’s seamstress mother, Eudora (Oprah Winfrey), mentions that she’d really like some grandbabies. At that point, Tiana’s biological clock kicks in like a heat-seeking, pheromone-loaded missile. What a way to send mixed messages, Disney.

Further, the New Orleans setting of The Princess and the Frog seems rather insincere, for this could have been a great opportunity to relish the jazz-soaked culture but instead, Disney has merely chosen a convenient place where one needn’t explain that most of the characters are black. The movie’s titular princess, Tiana, isn’t a true princess but a waitress who favors double shifts to save money towards her late father’s dream of owning a restaurant. At first, Tiana scores major points for spurning any advances from ladies’ men in favor of hard work and making her own way in life. Then, it suddenly looks like all her hard work just isn’t enough to earn enough money to buy a restaurant, so Tiana looks to other alternatives. During one particularly desperate moment, she wishes upon a star and then looks down to see a frog; naturally, she kisses this frog in the hopes that he’ll turn into a prince. Of course, this amphibian really is a prince — to be specific, the ethnically ambiguous Prince Naveen (Bruno Campos) — but, since Tiana isn’t a princess (she was merely dressed that way for a masquerade party), the magic doesn’t go her way and, instead, turns her into a frog as well. For the second act, both frogs flee to the swampy bayou to figure out how to become human once again and, yes, of course they fall in love.

The Princess and the Frog takes a lot of cues from the old Disney catalog and will rustle up memories from Aladdin, The Little Mermaid, and The Lion King. A few of the characters are very well-drawn caricatures and also distract from the all-too-disappointing main players. Tiana’s lifelong best friend, Charlotte (Jennifer Cody, who does striking voice work), is an amusing Southern belle who squeals in delight at the sight of her father, “Big Daddy” La Bouff (John Goodman), and his wallet. Then, there’s the sinister Dr. Facilier a.k.a. the Shadow Man (Keith David), who looks like the voodoo love child of Prince and Little Richard but may be a bit too villainous for toddler-aged kiddies. Finally, a few bayou creatures are sure to charm, including jazz-playing alligator Louis (Michael-Leon Wooley) and romantic firefly Ray (Jim Cummings). With the help of Ray and Louis, Tiana and Naveen seek the help of a benevolent voodoo priestess named Mama Odie (Jenifer Lewis), who doesn’t help them much in the way of magic but does provide the movie’s only inspired musical number. The rest of the score is entirely flat and humdrum and seems as if it wasn’t even coordinated with the rest of the project.

Perhaps I’m being too harsh here. Aside from this trivial nonsense of a severely disappointing storyline, the film does quite well. There’s this amazing thing called “hand-drawn animation” that looks a lot better than the latest mutation of CGI or 3D hell. Imagine actually being able to marvel at thousands of lightning bugs as they dance above a Louisiana bayou before forming intricate patterns, swooshing up into the sky, and whirling into a fireworks display — that is — without it all being shoved into your 3D glasses. Further, no so-called superior technology can ever hope to replicate the incredible detail and striking color of this traditional hand-drawn stuff. It’s such a shame that Disney’s return to old-school hand-drawn style has to be marred with such a mediocre story. Don’t get me wrong though. The Princess and the Frog is an enjoyable diversion and much better than a lot of the crap shoveled out to kids these days. I just wish the script (not to mention the ordinary musical numbers) was even half as majestic as the animation.

Agent Bedhead lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She and her little black heart can be found at agentbedhead.com.









Pride and Prejudice and Zombies Adds David O. Russell | Serious Moonlight













Comments

Well...while I agree with you in some aspects, I do think this Disney film is better about Tiana's role as a woman and a professional. True, she gets the prince, but she also gets her restaurant. SHE owns and runs it. There's something to be said about that, opposed to the previously pampered princesses of the days of yore. So, while it's not perfect, I think it's a step (maybe a small one) in the right direction.

And I'm so with you on the voodoo man. I thought he was a bit too scary for little kids.

Posted by: bonnie at December 14, 2009 2:25 PM

I'll watch it. I'm a sucker for pretty animation. That's the reason why I watched both Tinkerbell movies. Oh yeah. Boy those were pretty.

Posted by: figgy at December 14, 2009 2:28 PM

Hey! It's me!

I took the kidlets to see this over the weekend and now I'll be taking them again. They LOVED it! It probably helped that one of them is named after the princess...

Posted by: Trouble at December 14, 2009 2:29 PM

More scary than Rasputin or Ursula? As a fairly timid child, I boycotted both Anastasia and The Little Mermaid for years and years. I don't think that scary has ever been something Disney avoids.

Posted by: esme at December 14, 2009 2:30 PM

Aww, it's too bad that the movie isn't that good. I love Disney's old hand-drawn animation flicks.

Posted by: Jelinas at December 14, 2009 2:36 PM

"The Princess and the Frog is an enjoyable diversion and much better than a lot of the crap shoveled out to kids these days."


I disagree. I think every go want that show is to put out. They don't even every good know 'Dora the Explora' have without decide. Am I right? Sometimes I bet need wash smiling and confused. Even now, Princess even has go 'Big Daddy' found disappear! What a world we live in.

Posted by: Adventureman at December 14, 2009 2:42 PM

There’s this amazing thing called “hand-drawn animation” that looks a lot better than the latest mutation of CGI or 3D hell. Imagine actually being able to marvel at thousands of lightning bugs as they dance above a Louisiana bayou before forming intricate patterns, swooshing up into the sky, and whirling into a fireworks display—that is—without it all being shoved into your 3D glasses.

That's the exact reason why I want to see this movie. Human beings weren't meant to watch movies in 3D. Have you ever been to a movie and said, "Gee, this was really good, but it needs more computers, and I wish it was in 3D?" Yes, of course you have, Darth Corleone's Robotic Executioner, but I'm talking about humans here.

Plus, I want Disney's animated swan song to be an actual movie, and not some film about a talking cow voiced by Rosanne Barr.

Posted by: George at December 14, 2009 2:50 PM

bonnie! What, no Spoiler Alert! I'm sure not going to see it now that the ending is all ruined for me.

Posted by: Codeman at December 14, 2009 2:51 PM

Codeman, first of all, SO sorry [sheepish expression]. I reread my comment, and I did give something away. I hate when people do that, and even more when I do that. But don't let that detract you from seeing it. There's a lot to enjoy. I don't know about you, but I know, going into a Disney movie that any girl will get the prince...it's Disney. Unless you know of any Disney princesses who punch out the princes and then steal their balls and sell them on the black market, you know wedding bells are inevitable--Cinderella, Belle, Ariel, Jasmine, Snow White anyone?

Posted by: bonnie at December 14, 2009 3:03 PM

It's so like the stagnant people in New Orleans it's sad, but artfully drawn and giddily amusing, with a happy ending and leaving you thinking.. "WOW THAT Whole MOVIE WAS disappointingly Weird". I agree in your dreams good things come to those who wish upon a star and don't get their hands dirty with education, hard work, but then add fairy tale venue we must stick to with a voodoo addition and bigoted opinion on how a normal black girl can be a princess, sorta, you get the nasty ick factor. Women rule there. They are told you got the kids now steer them to sucess if possible. No man has the guts to stick by, marry and live a decent life anymore. So.. nothing changes, racial imbalances, dumbing down of a culture and more and more, the question of whether fathers are really necessary, is being raised, is alive and flourishing was Disney's plan.. they suceeded.

Posted by: dee cee at December 14, 2009 3:27 PM

Hey Bonnie, did you see the 6th sense yet? Yeah, Bruce Willis is really a ghost.

That just happened.

Posted by: superasente at December 14, 2009 3:44 PM

figgy,

I've watched both the Tinkerbell movies and plan on watching the third when it is released next year. I'm a sucker for 2d movies.

Posted by: DoubleH at December 14, 2009 3:44 PM

Hey Bonnie, I know you're a chick and all, but you should really see Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back. Darth Vader is Luke's father.

Boom.

Posted by: superasente at December 14, 2009 3:45 PM

Hey -- hey Bonnie. Ever seen The Usual Suspects? Yeah, Verbal is making the whole story up.

Suck it.

Posted by: superasente at December 14, 2009 3:48 PM

Between Adventureman and Dee Cee's posts I need to go lie down. Wake me when the lambs stop screaming.

Posted by: TylerDFC at December 14, 2009 3:51 PM

The best part about this movie is the visuals. Hands down. Just a gorgeous, gorgeous film.

That said, I agree with Bedhead on all points. Everything was going fine in the beginning (independent woman style) until sometime on their quest in the Bayou she loses her brain and independence. Characters were fun, but nothing very memorable except the firefly Ray. Music was fun, but there aren't any songs that got stuck in my head or made me want to buy mp3's of them all...

Overall, a nice effort, but still doesn't get even close to the heights of the classics.

Posted by: BAM at December 14, 2009 3:52 PM

This will contain spoilers, but nothing worse then what was above--

I'd have to disagree (partially). It's true that the end sort of ends with 'all you need is luuuuv,' but it doesn't come out of nowhere and it certainly doesn't come from that one comment by Oprah-as-her-mother (that comment is immediately followed by a musical number in which the main character re-affirms her desire to open her restaurant).

There are two competing ideas in the film--hard work will make you happy OR having a family you love will make you happy. Today, we'd like to think both are possible, but in Disney-land Tiana has to chose. The end is most disappointing because Tiana choses the conservative/traditional-Disney route (all I need is YOU to be happy, Prince!) and that sort of doesn't mesh well with today's definition of an independent woman.

Posted by: wicherwill at December 14, 2009 4:04 PM

I was really hoping this movie was a return to form for 2D animation and it sounds like, for the most part, it is. Awesome.

Posted by: annoyingmouse at December 14, 2009 4:05 PM

I don't know about you, but I know, going into a Disney movie that any girl will get the prince...it's Disney.

Exactly. I knew they weren't changing the formula. Still want to see it.

Ursula scared the shit out of me. I doubt this Voodoo Man can top that. And what about the Queen from Snow White?

Posted by: Brie at December 14, 2009 4:08 PM

Oh Jazz-soaked culture.... not to be confused with (insert Tiger Woods reference here)

Posted by: Colostomy Baggins at December 14, 2009 4:18 PM

God damn I love Adventureman. I could (try to) read that guy's posts all damn day.

Posted by: Snath at December 14, 2009 4:31 PM

My wife took our three year old to this on Friday; her first movie in a theater! My wife thought it was pretty good, but my daughter wouldn't shut up about it until something like two or three in the morning. We just couldn't get her to go to sleep, it was ridiculous! She just wanted to sing and dance and act like a princess all night long.

So I think Disney accomplished their goals.

Posted by: Snath at December 14, 2009 4:33 PM

...Am I missing something with Adventureman? Or did my brain just up and leave when I wasn't looking?

Posted by: dsbs at December 14, 2009 4:55 PM

I have to disagree with your assessment of Tiana, she works hard to get the restaurant, and in the end it HER(sorry no italics) money that buys the old sugar mill. She falls in love, that doesn't mean she's giving up her dream, it just means she not willing to sell her soul, so to speak, in order to get what she wants.

Posted by: Person at December 14, 2009 4:56 PM

Yep, Disney's goals Snath is to get sucker ass parents like you and me to take our kid's to this shit, then buy them the outfit for Halloween, buy it on DVD, grab the Happy Meal with the toy on the way home from said theater, and tuck them in their beds with their Princess and the Frog comforter tucked tightly around our little ones as they clutch their (insert kid's favorite Princess and the Frog character) stuffed doll oh so tightly. That's always Disney's goal.

Fuck Team Edward, Disney are the REAL vampires.

Posted by: John Denver's Wingman at December 14, 2009 5:14 PM

Thanks, superasente, for "spoiling" those movies for me. Don't bother to tell me about Rosebud: I already know.

Posted by: bonnie at December 14, 2009 5:22 PM

How did she have to choose? If anything, it seemed to argue for balance. The character that was all about marrying a prince was portrayed as very silly and shallow, not someone to emulate.


I'm not seeing how she was any less independent by the end of the movie. She opened her restaurant with her own money. The movie made a point in showing that. The prince wasn't wealthy, and didn't magically grant her every wish. They did work together in repairing the building, but how is that a bad thing?

I also liked the fact that the villain was actually creepy. He felt less bland than most recent villains and he wasn't played for laughs, ever. It gives the movie a needed energy when the villain is actually something to be afraid of.

Posted by: misty at December 14, 2009 5:23 PM

It's the sled, dude. It's the sled from his childhood. Do you remember that scene from early in the movie? He's out in the snow and the wealthy guy comes to take him away (creeeepy). It's the sled from that scene.

That reminds me.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1qNUajsSwI

Posted by: superasente at December 14, 2009 6:20 PM

I was going to cut a bitch if the voodoo 'Shadow Man' wasn't Keith David. The man has the best voice for that sort of thing in the biz.

Posted by: Daniel Hall at December 14, 2009 7:35 PM

OK, OK, but what about the firefly? That thing was giving off a serious Jar Jar Binks vibe in the trailer, is he not as bad in the movie or is he actually worse?

Posted by: Irving Washington at December 14, 2009 9:06 PM

Agent Bedhead (aka JillAss) has clearly not been in love for a very very very long time. women make choices based on love that they would not otherwise. that is the point of the movie JillAss.

Posted by: la chica at December 14, 2009 9:31 PM


I haven't posted in a while. I haven't felt too clever. And I'm not feeling especially clever right now, either.

But look, this movie is a chorus of stereotypes, covered in a Disney meringue. Imagine that someone had gotten out the high-stepping "Scarlet Creeper" from the the big book of weird racial representations, taken it to the princess boutique at Disneyworld, and gotten it prettied up for little girls, so that he seemed a handsome royal. So the only black prince is dirt poor? And not even black? And a neer-do-well? And the only black princess is not really a princess, but a mouthpiece for bootstrapping? Suck it, people. Let's not revel in this movie, this insufferable piece of crap. Want to take the temperature of American race relations? Here is your anal thermometer. Oh, and they haven't washed it since the last time they used it.

Seriously, please, let offer a critique here, and not just debate this on Disney's terms. Which princess is more liberated? Is she the best? Blargh!

Of course, my daughter, who is 3, couldn't look away. So I've got some work to do.

Posted by: Lance at December 14, 2009 9:43 PM

You know what, sometimes when it comes to little kids' movies, I like to just let all the crap go and see if we have fun. And we did. I took my 6 year old to the premiere in NYC and she absolutely loved it. She was a bit frightened by the scary parts, but relieved when Shadow Man was gone. I thought it was a beautiful film, and I didn't feel a need to dissect the messages. At this age my girl believes in love, and who am I to mess with that?

Posted by: Cindy at December 14, 2009 9:52 PM

Sigh, I really wanted to hear BSlims take on this. I kept refreshing, hoping he would show up, because, sadly, he is one of my favorite things abut Pajiba (as are TK and Vermilion, so I doubt Slim would feel flattered...)

So I am sitting here, thinking that maybe Slim is at work, and for some reason cannot post like he normally does. Or mayhaps he feels like he said everything he needs to in the Box Office thread (yeah, I don't think so either)

But then, I got an irresistible image in my minds eye. Slim, sitting in a theater watching this movie. Little girl, face full of anticipation, watching a movie with her daddy, ON A SCHOOL NIGHT! Slim, sulking in the theatre, looking at his beloved daughters shining face and praying (if he does such a thing) that this movie does not disappoint her.

I cannot wait to know.

Posted by: Theresa at December 14, 2009 10:25 PM

Let's all focus on the real question here: what is a JillAss? Is this something the cool kids are saying these days? Why is Agent Bedhead a JillAss, and not, say, a BrendaAss or a DebbieAss?

Posted by: marya at December 14, 2009 11:13 PM

"Then, there’s the sinister Dr. Facilier a.k.a. the Shadow Man (Keith David), who looks like the voodoo love child of Prince and Little Richard..."

Really? Every time I see the billboard, I swear they made Meshach Taylor (from Designing Women) be the character model.

Posted by: Leigh at December 15, 2009 12:36 AM

I whole heartedly agree with Misty on the theme of balance. Tiana teaches Naveen how to work a little, and Naveen teaches Tiana how to dance. As for the locale, well, frogs would need to end up in a swamp right? How ridiculous would it have been in Chicago? (I know, originally a swamp, I live there)

Took my 8 y.o. and 4 y.o. twin daughters, and we all enjoyed it.

Ray the lightning bug was great, and has one of the sweeter story lines.

Posted by: antietam at December 15, 2009 2:23 AM

a jillass is a female jackass. this is the stupidest review i have read all year. i normally enjoy the snark but snark combined with stupidity doesn't work for me.

Posted by: la chica at December 15, 2009 2:10 PM

All I know is that this movie saves the tradition of taking my Mom to a movie on Christmas Day. We go to the Christmes Eve Service at church, so we can spend Christmas Morning opening gifts and drinking cocoa, then hit the first matinee...and I was trying to imagine my 84 year old Mom watching Avatar :-)

Disney movies are perfect if you accept what they are: beautiful to look at, entertaining and romantic in the old-fashioned sense of the word.

Posted by: lil_a at December 15, 2009 3:51 PM

More scary than Rasputin or Ursula? As a fairly timid child, I boycotted both Anastasia and The Little Mermaid for years and years. I don't think that scary has ever been something Disney avoids.

Posted by: esme at December 14, 2009 2:30 PM

Rasputin wasn't a Disney villain. Anastasia was a Don Bluth (The Secret of NIMH, The Land Before Time) creation.

Posted by: duckandcover at December 15, 2009 5:57 PM

The end is most disappointing because Tiana choses the conservative/traditional-Disney route (all I need is YOU to be happy, Prince!) and that sort of doesn't mesh well with today's definition of an independent woman.


SPOILER
Really? It's conservative/disney to own your own business? Name a Disney princess who did that. In the end, she got her man AND her restaurant. SHE ran it, he helped. It was named after HER, not him. Yeah, they got married, but it was her dream to own a restaurant and she accomplished that. Marrying the Prince was a sidenote. Are we really saying that just because she got married in addition to making her dream come true, it cancels out having her own business? That women can only have one and not the other? Really?

Posted by: ceejeemcbeegee at December 15, 2009 9:42 PM

How about Cruella DeVil? Bitch still scares me and I'm on the late side of 40.

Posted by: alacrify at December 18, 2009 10:26 PM

la chica this reviewer actually makes sense so be quiet already! Princess and the Frog may be good in some aspects but it's no Disney classic

Posted by: la chica is a dumbass at December 30, 2009 2:37 AM

I'm late to this party, but my three-year-old child is obsessed with this movie. As to the songs, I liked the one about the friends on "the other side." I suppose it's conventional, but I don't think it's putting forth anything too onerous. It also pokes fun at the girl who is obsessed with princesses.

Posted by: samantha t at September 20, 2010 10:34 AM

The definition of some really good music players for kids? My cousin is 5 years of age and for christmas I'd prefer to buy her a mp3 player, she loves my nano but I think it becomes difficult for her to utilize it. Are there the proper job ones for kids?

Posted by: MP3 players for kids at March 18, 2011 6:58 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time