free counter with statistics Pan's Labyrinth | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

pan.jpg

Alice in Bloodland

Pan’s Labyrinth / Dustin Rowles

Film Reviews | January 17, 2007 | Comments (91)


For folks like myself, who view fantasy flicks (or even “adult” fantasy) with the same esteem as most comic-book adaptations (i.e., with righteous disdain), you may be surprised by how entertained you’d be by Pan’s Labyrinth, a realization all the more unanticipated given the director behind the project, Guillermo del Toro (the Mexican Harry Knowles), who brought us the decidedly unfantastical Hellboy and Blade II. Granted, del Toro has more than his fair share of fans, but most — I suspect — have obscure allergies, spend countless hours chortling on message boards devoted to made-up languages, and masturbate to anime. Not that I’m judging, ever mindful as I am that it is exactly those sort of people who are known to populate comments sections with implorations to do more research, lest we forget to mention the small magical flourishes, of which there are many in the exquisitely rendered Pan’s Labyrinth.

There is also enough in Labyrinth to allow those in my position to forget, for considerable spans of time, that we are basically watching an adult fairy tale, a notion made a little more palatable by the attendant violence and the intelligent mix of politics and imagination. Certainly, there are enough fairies, fauns, and even a Lewis Carroll toad (that regurgitates its innards) to appeal to the disturbed, Tim Burton-esque adolescent in all of us, but the adult themes — war, the loss of innocence, the harsh cruelty of life — resonate loudest, even in del Toro’s impeccably created fantasyland, a divine creation that makes Spielberg’s attempts at the same seem like the work of constipated hack playing with a box of 12 Crayola crayons. In fact, I haven’t seen anything this voluptuously detailed since What Dreams May Come, though Labyrinth exchanges lush backdrops for gothic darkness, creating a bloody, almost three-dimensional dream netherworld.

Thankfully, Labyrinth also has something Vincent Ward never could have imagined: a coherent plot, here a dark, elaborate fairy tale within an engaging political allegory. The movie opens in 1944 Spain, shortly after the Spanish Civil War. The Franco fascists are in control of the country, mired in a struggle to pick off the few remaining isolated Republican militias.

As the movie opens, Ofelia (Ivana Baquero) is en route with her ailing, heavily pregnant mother to meet her new asshole stepfather, Captain Vidal (Sergi Lopez), who has been posted with his men in rural northern Spain to eradicate one of the last pockets of rebel guerillas. Vidal is the archetypical fairy tale stepfather: authoritarian, cruel, inhumane, and hostile to Ofelia. He’s also the power-mad mini-dictator of the outpost, easily threatened and quick to brutally snuff out anyone suspected of opposing the fascist cause. Unbeknownst to him, however, there are two rebels within his midst — the doctor and a servant, Mercedes (Y tu mama tambien’s Maribel Verdu) — who sneak food and medical supplies to the rebels.

On her first night, soon after Vidal viciously kills two suspected rebels, a cricket turns into a fairy and guides Ofelia into the labyrinth, where Pan (Doug Jones) — a mythical faun with Beetle Juice mannerisms — informs her that she is the princess of an enchanted underworld where her real father wears the crown. Pan, who bears a striking resemblance to an ancient tree, informs Ofelia that she must perform three magical tasks to ensure that her “essence is intact” before the next full moon in order to take her rightful place in the fantasy kingdom (I know, I know. I’d be rolling my eyes, too). The tasks include feeding stones to the giant toad, stealing a knife from a faceless, eyeless creature (who will fuck up your dreams for days), and, eventually, confronting Vidal. These tasks, however, are interrupted by her mother’s pregnancy complications, portended by a bloody Rorschach in a book of fairy tales Ofelia is reading. Pan assists her in this matter by offering a mandrake — placed in a bowl of milk under her mother’s bed and fed two drops of blood — that ultimately leads to the film’s crisis point, where both the political and fantasy storylines intersect.

Credit del Toro the filmmaker for creating such visually hypnotic film that he is able to pick up the slack where del Toro the storyteller occasionally stumbles. His reliance on fantasy lore and archetypes is either lazy, genius, or both — I don’t understand the genre enough to know if it is exhaustive research or simple recycling. In either respect, the disjunctive weaving of fantasy and reality is both jarring and cinematically melodic, like combining Public Enemy with Buffalo Springfield — it doesn’t make sense, but it somehow works; it’s breathtaking, even. The fantasy aspects of Labyrinth bring levity to the harsh political parable, while the conflict between the Francoists and the dwindling Loyalists adds heft to a fairy tale about a girl with a serious case of Peter Pan Syndrome. The combination is intoxicating.

Labyrinth is remarkable enough, in fact, to change my entire perception of del Toro — I’m not convinced, nor will I ever be, that Blade II and Hellboy are good, or even decent films, and Mimic may be one of the worst I’ve ever seen. But, maybe — just maybe — he’s sacrificed his talent up until now for cash, whoring himself out to adolescent boys and adolescent-minded men. Granted, I think that working in his native language and the relative simplicity of a fairy tale helps here, but when it comes del Toro’s stunning flair for visuals, consider me a convert.

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. He lives with his wife in Ithaca, New York. You may email him, or leave a comment below.


Last King of Scotland, The | Children of Men



Comments

interesting review, which I frankly didn't read too closely because I'm anxious to see this film and I don't want too much given away. Dustin's criticisms of Hellboy and Blade II are pretty accurate, although I will admit that I like Hellboy despite its silliness. What I think Dustin missed, however, is The Devil's Backbone, an earlier Spanish-language film by del Toro that also has the Spanish civil war as its backdrop. This film is absolutely wonderful, and fully banishes any thought of del Toro as a commercial-hack of a film maker (although he seems to cheerfully take on any goofy project that will pay the bills). The Devil's Backbone is a ghost story at an orphanage run by Republicans in central Spain, and it is everything that a fantasy story for adults should be: disturbing, populated by realistic characters, upsetting, and shockingly beautiful. It sounds as though del Toro is covering much of the same territory with Pan, but after seeing The Devil's Backbone I will gladly return there with him. It was a bit tough for me to track it down on disc, but I would highly recommend it to any cinephile, and especially to Dustin; I think seeing it will significantly change his opinion of del Toro.

Posted by: Ian at January 2, 2007 9:41 AM

I did see Pan's Labyrinth over the weekend, and adored it -- and I still agree with Ian that the reviewer wouldn't have found this film so unexpectedly entertaining if he had seen the also wonderful Devil's Backbone.

Posted by: Gordon McAlpin at January 2, 2007 11:04 AM

I'll third the glowing recommendations for "Devil's Backbone"...a truly mesmerizing and wonderful ghost story that is less a ghost story and more a tragic yet optimistic tale of evil, loss, and redemption.

I will admit, though, that I thoroughly enjoyed "Hellboy" and "Blade II" for the mindless fun they are meant to be. Del Toro is obviously a huge comic book fan (I'm not) and the influences can be seen in both of these pulpy flicks.

"Cronos" is another of del Toro's films worth checking out. While not as accomplished or involving as "Devil's Backbone", it definitely is further proof that del Toro, while sometimes reveling too much in his comic book fanboy love, is quite an accomplished and gifted filmmaker when given the right material.

Posted by: idiot dentist at January 2, 2007 11:40 AM

Del Toro made Blade 2 so that he could get the backing to make Hellboy (which is a terrific book to screen adaptation).

Disclaimer: I have no allergies, no knowledge of any constructed languages, and masturbate to real women only.

Posted by: Adam C at January 2, 2007 12:39 PM

I really can't wait to see this, and I really have to find "Deveil's Backbone" this is the second time someone has mentioned it! Where have I been!?!

Posted by: MRod at January 2, 2007 12:47 PM

Have to disagree with the Hellboy hate, it was everything it was supposed to be and more. And as for the cheap shots at anime and geeks, well, methinks Mr. Rowles is stuck somewhere in 1992, maybe he shouldn't procreate. :) Anyway, nice review of the film and I will check it out.
Oh and the shout out to Devil's Backbone is much deserved SEE IT NOW!

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 2, 2007 1:07 PM

I loved The Devil's Backbone and look forward to seeing this new effort.

Ian---TDB is available through Netflix, which is how I saw it.

Posted by: MaiGirl at January 2, 2007 3:12 PM

OK, I'm going to forgive the insults, and chalk them up to humor. But only once. I also enjoyed the hell out of Hellboy and Blade II, and the Devil's Backbone is some beautiful film making. The stuff I've seen of Pan's Labyrinth is stunning, so I'm excited to see a movie that's visually arresting and also a genuinely good movie. This dispels my earlier worries that it would end up like The Cell - stunning visually, but shit movie.

Posted by: TK at January 2, 2007 3:34 PM

I guess I'm a geek since I liked Hellboy (but not Blade II...or any Blade flick for that matter!)but I also liked Cronos and loved The Devil's Backbone. I can't wait to see this one. It's almost like Del Toro has been working his way up to this one through watching his previous efforts.

Posted by: wozzle at January 2, 2007 4:22 PM

Does attempting to create my own language count?
I, like many here, also enjoyed Hellboy and am dying to see The Devil's Backbone. Therefore I will be seeing this, especially after such a glowing review. Senor Del Toro...I salute you!

Posted by: ScarletKnight at January 2, 2007 9:33 PM

"1944 Spain, shortly after the Spanish Civil War" 5 years after major conflict and 8 after the beginning is hardly shortly. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Civil_War) Not to be an asshole, and so forth. Maybe if you spent less time looking at goat porn, you could get your dates straight.

Posted by: slothrop at January 3, 2007 8:34 AM

Wait.... what's wrong with goat porn?

Posted by: Hattie at January 3, 2007 9:08 AM

I'm really excited to see this movie! Yes, I loved Hellboy, the Blade movies, and especially El Espinazo del Diablo. No, I don't watch anime, I certainly don't masturbate to it, and my allergies are very mainstream, thank you very much. Oh yeah, and I'm a girl. Up yours!

Posted by: qtp2t at January 3, 2007 10:19 AM

Ooh! I'm looking forward to seeing it, though I think that creepy eyes-in-hands creature is seriously going to make me squirm.

Posted by: rebel mama at January 3, 2007 3:05 PM

I have just seen the movie and found it very boring and conventional. Well, never mind. Also, the corny ending just about ruined it for me.

Posted by: Kkskt at January 3, 2007 3:20 PM

Have to say that i'm really looking forward to this film, but not the standard-issue fanboy. I thought Blade II was a throw-away film and from what i saw, The Devil's Backbone looked like a damn goof flick. However, I was torn on hellboy even though the director's cut was good, it never even approached the cool, dark, gritty, haunting, and funny-as-hell comic that it was based on. Hopefully the next one will more closely resemble the comic.

Posted by: Smatt584 at January 3, 2007 3:55 PM

Rebel mama, I disagree wholly with everything you said, I really don't know if we saw the same movie with a response like that, this, and Children of Men, are the best films of the year.

Posted by: brandon at January 3, 2007 9:25 PM

This movie was so intense, I started shaking about ten minutes before it ended and didn't stop until well after I got home. It was such an incredible, immersive experience that I didn't want it to end.

Posted by: anna at January 3, 2007 10:21 PM

"And as for the cheap shots at anime and geeks, well, methinks Mr. Rowles is stuck somewhere in 1992..."

in '92, Mr. Rowles had a haircut resembling Jordan Knight from the New Kids on the Block, lightning bolts and all. Perhaps this is where his disdain for anime and geekdom originates...

(don't flame me too bad, Dustin...)

Posted by: idiot dentist at January 3, 2007 11:47 PM

Wow. Condescending to an entire group of people and an entire genre of pop culture. Once again, an elitist outdoes himself. Good show! Smell you later at the Jenny Lewis concert!

Posted by: I Am Never Wrong at January 4, 2007 2:11 AM

Other reviews agree with this one. This should be real good. I liked Hellboy.
"What Dreams May Come" was good art, I always wondered why that technology seemed to only have been used once.

Posted by: Londor at January 4, 2007 7:57 AM

People who dismiss anime, sci fi and fantasy out of hand are stupid. Not everyone who can appreciate imaginative artistic endeavors is a loser geek. Get your head out of your frat brother's ass.

Posted by: Have a fantastic day! at January 4, 2007 3:53 PM

Are there actually people who go to Wikipedia to learn the irrefutable truth? Yeesh...

Posted by: ? at January 4, 2007 5:01 PM

I still boggle that X-Men 3 got a great review on this site but Hellboy was panned. I love that movie so damn hard and have high hopes for the sequel.

Posted by: Rosie at January 5, 2007 3:11 AM

Cronos, The Devil's Backbone, Blade 2, Hellboy, Pan's Labyrinth.
They either have Del Toro, or Del Toro _and_ Ron Perlman, who is, along with Edward James Olmos, among the most enjoyable actors to cath in their latter day career arc.
I contemplate what other directors could have pulled out of the asshat that was Blade 2 that would have been more satisfying - I keep coming up with - Blade, Trinity (ooh, vomit on the keyboard!).

On first viewing,The Devil's Backbone actually took me and my friends back to a younger frame of mind, identifying with the orphans who make up most of the films' cast - and being scared of the unknown. I preferred it by far to The Sixth Sense, which was pandering to an American taste for dragged out reveals of the obvious.

Pan's Labyrinth is a near masterful approach to the Fairy Tales (which I hope to se explored in any Hellboy followup, as Mignola, Hellboys' creator and Del Toro's collaborator delved deep into Humans fearful Pagan history) as a genre suitable for storytellers of all scales.

I think he could have done as much with a smaller budget, but truly, I've appreciated the lush art direction of most of his films as much as editing, sound design and casting. And his action sequences represent violence as both exciting and terrifying, not merely Michael Bay yoga sequences with a body count.

It's funny to think that as movie reviewers (of all walks of life) have become more and more ossified in their interpretation of what cinema is capable of and what it_must_be_ to score points, the mass of reviewers leave imagination as an ingredient at the door. They forget to forget the frame and keep seeing the film from a dogmatic POV, never letting go and falling into - what's that thing, suspended disbelief?

Films may not be made for the jaded sensibility you write from, Justin. Fortunately or unfortunately, very few directors become critics, and vice versa. Have you made even a short film lately?

Me? I sculpt. I'd scare myself if I'd come up with these monsters, but I do recommend Del Toro's Spanish Civil War duo to people for grand storytelling and on the grounds that it respects this: terror starts with childhood - our artforms _should_ respect that. History is not as precious about children as we pretend to be in North America.
As a genre, Horror misses the boat when it stays with foolish teenagers and roadtrips gone wrong. It also mistakes exploitation and pandering for narrative elements.

Posted by: damien walder at January 5, 2007 11:42 AM

I actually enjoyed Hellboy, it was all sorts of comic book fun, but those gross evil monsters looked a tad fake. Anyway, Ron Perlman was so great in it, how could you not like it? I can't wait to see this one, sounds fantastic, I really dig the gothic fairy tale take with a political message. Maybe it'll be comparable to Gaiman's Stardust (which I can't wait to see either!)...

Posted by: gina at January 6, 2007 11:18 AM

I saw this movie and loved it. I am not a del toro fan, I don't think I made it all the way through Blade II and I thought Hellboy was very disapointing, but this movie was wonderful. It was more like Devil's Backbone than his more recient, and crapier, efforts.

I do wish that he had integrated and extended the fantasy sequences. I think the film would have flowed much better had the second task taken much longer and some of the later battle scenes been trimed.

Posted by: gee at January 7, 2007 2:19 AM

Stop shortening the title to "Labyrinth".
There's already a beautiful movie by that name, starring the wonderful David Bowie, and he didn't sex-up any goats.

Posted by: Loob at January 7, 2007 5:31 PM

I have never posted a message on the internet before, but I can't resist replying to "Slothrop". Of all the finicky messages and corrections knob jockeys such as this intellectual behemoth frequently post on websites, this was the fu*king dumbest. Incorrectly arguing with a reviewer's contextual use of the word 'shortly'? You are the very definition of a modern major venereal disease. Surely you have more important tasks in your life than penning that little ditty... an untidy sock drawer? Dirty hair, perhaps? You've cost me my posting virginity and one billable unit of time; karma's going to fu*k you up for that, you peanut.

Totally worth your posting cherry, Peter. Totally worth it. -- DR

Posted by: Peter at January 7, 2007 10:50 PM

Before reading this review I had no idea that del Toro had directed Mimic or Blade II. I suppose I've been blocking things out. Regardless, I was incredibly excited when I heard about Pan's Labywrinth and its setting of post Civil War Spain. You can count me as another fan of The Devil's Backbone, but additionally I have a personal connection with that time and place as much of my grandmother's family (including my Abuelita herself) was exiled by Franco's regime. I grew up with the stories and if I were a better writer would have written my grandmother's story. She was about Ofelia's age and I'm taking her to see the movie this weekend.

Posted by: Pia at January 8, 2007 8:47 PM

I won't comment about del Toro's other works, I really didn't like them but all of them(yes even Mimic)were etertaining in their time.

Pan's Labyrinth is amazing. When I saw previews for it I was really excited, I figured a new movie was finally coming out that would give me the same feelings that the Dark Crystal, Labyrinth(the 80's movie)and the Never Ending Story gave me as a kid. Wow did it do that and so much more.

My favorite parts were both the fantastic and the realistic. The best part in the entire film has to be when Mercedes holds her knife in Vidal's mouth and says:"You won't be the first pig I've gutted!" and gives him a wicked new smil! Then of course the pale man scene is amazing too.

Honestly the most unique feeling it gave me, which no other movie has ever given me, was this question: "Did I like the fantasy or the reality of the movie more?"

Posted by: Angelmonster at January 12, 2007 7:15 PM

I just saw the movie... expected to love it but just came out horrified. I knew the movie was dark but had no idea it was so shockingly brutal. I wish I had known what to expect--neither of the reviews I read mentioned it--but I think this is one of the most violent movies I've ever seen. Not stupid, Bruckheimer violence or show-offy epic Braveheart/Gladiator violence, but sheer monstrous brutality. Just wanted to make that clear for anyone who didn't know... my friend that I brought would never have been willing to see it if she'd known.

Posted by: sephorablue at January 14, 2007 1:41 AM

Just saw this today,and I was impressed. I am already a del Toro fan, from The Devils Backbone and Cronos, but this film transported me. Actually, what it put me in mind of was "Heavenly Creatures', a 1994 flick with Kate Winslet which is also about young girls and their descent into a fantasy illusionary fairytale world they invent to cope with an otherwise unbearable reality...not unlike the one this poor child finds herself in. Oh, and tho I agree with sephorablue that this film was brutal, the conditions of the times were as horrific as they were protrayed..war is hell. Could have done without the graphic self-surgery,however..and I havent been able to watch torture scenes , ever. Nope, never. Guess I really am a wuss...I can live with that.

Posted by: devildoggie at January 14, 2007 11:03 PM

I have to agree with sephorablue, I didn't expect the violence to be so brutal or realistic - I found myself watching some portions of the film through my fingers so I wouldn't be able to see the whole image on the screen (yes, devildoggie, especially the self-surgery.) Nevertheless, I thought the film was amazing, very reminiscent of the Devil's Backbone (another shout-out!) War is hell indeed.

Posted by: mary b at January 15, 2007 12:52 PM

I just came from seeing this, and I really enjoyed it. It's definitely dark and disturbing, and I was cringing during some parts of the film. I haven't seen much of del Toro's work, but I was impressed with this film. Great storyline and I was attentive, which is sort of rare for me, because I often find myself becoming fidgety in movie theaters. And that eyeless monstrosity is totally going to fuck up my dreams for days.

Posted by: Sarah at January 15, 2007 4:40 PM

Read the review and then the comments and wondered where I could find The Devil's Backbone. A major surprise, it showed up on the Dish two days later. It really was excellent and I am now stoked even more to see Pan's Labyrinth.

Posted by: djo at January 18, 2007 10:46 AM

This was hands down the most powerful movie I've seen in a long time. I always get pretty into movies, but I came out of this an emotional wreck. There were plenty of flaws, of course, but they were outweighed by the overwhelming-ness of the rest of the movie. Actually, I'm pretty surprised that no one has mentioned the acting in the movie yet. All of the veteran actors were just incredible and I'm including the little girl who played Ofelia. It wasn't a case of "Well she was good for a twelve year old", because she could have been twenty five and not given a better performance. Please, please see it.

Posted by: kiki at January 19, 2007 2:47 PM

Must join the countless throng in praise of PL. I found myself far more invested in the characters than I expected and ended up crying my makeup off at several key points. I actually thought that Cpt. Vidal was kinda stock and ineffective until he clubbed the suspected rebel in the face. Hoo, was I wrong! One of my friends said that the Pale Man's stockpile of shoes reminded her of a picture from the Holocaust. I kinda doubt that it was intentional, but that small touch, and others like it, added so many layers to the film. One warning for the spoiler-free: if you get a chance to see HBO's First Look on PL, don't. It divulges a very important plot point that should be left for the viewer to discover.

Posted by: riko-chan at January 20, 2007 2:28 AM

I saw the movie, and found it to be a let down. I expected the brutality, but I expected at least an honest approach to the Spanish Civil War. Sorry to tell you, the so-called "heroes" ie the socialists -- were FAR MORE brutal than you saw in this; one of the reasons why there was such a backlash against them is because they were as brutal to the normal populace as Stalin. I would have not liked such a one-sided propaganda approach.

The movie itself did NOT make me someone who would want to be a part of this dark, I would say evil evil-feeling, faerie world. I understand he wanted to use Machen as an influence; this is not Machen. You can get a sense of attraction in Machen; I get a sense of revulsion here. The wonder is horror not awe and majesty; this is NOT how you do the faerie.

Posted by: HornOrSilk at January 20, 2007 4:31 AM

Meh, I don't think it's insanely anal to point out that this film isn't set "shortly" after the Civil War - the fact that the Fascists and Loyalists are still fighting on in this remote area long after the war is officially over (and while WW2 carries on) is an integral aspect of the film; the political tone would be different if it was set in, say, 1939.

Posted by: Stellanova at January 20, 2007 9:22 AM

Alright...

I didn't like Pan's Labyrinth.

1.) While Ivana Baquero is a beautiful child actress, I found her pale, stoney-faced reactions to fantastical happenings more and more grating as the film went on. In the face of a praying mantis turning into a fairy, a book with magic writing appearing out of no where, and in the face of a nightmare creature (with a dried blood mouth no less), the reactions are of a rather unimpressed, wonder-less child. I hate CGI for the handicaps they impose on an actor, but nevertheless, she is an ACTOR. Some sort of heightened state of emotion/urgency was necessary.

2.) Did anyone notice during her second task, she completely disregards the fairies and just randomly chooses a door to open up, which reveals the knife? Did this make sense, plot-wise, to anyone else????

3.) What the hell was the point of her becoming a 'princess'? I mean, really--what goals were accomplished?

For all the accolades lauded onto this film, I expected something much more. I'm dissapointed that people are becoming more and more won over by beautiful animation tricks, but are less inclined to mourn the loss of magic and ingenuity in the script and in the faces of actors playing opposite them.

Posted by: Lauren at January 20, 2007 4:59 PM

Well.... I can say this much, I lost appetite for my Haribo Gummy Cherries approximately 20 minutes into the film.

I agree with sephorablue and mary b: less gory more story, please. I watched half the movie through my fingers. It's one thing to accurately represent a historial era on film... But it's quite another to show a man's face eviscerated by way of bottle and (what seemed like) a 15 minute sequence of someone sewing up their own split-in-half face. Yuck.

I enjoyed the overall plot and fantasy elements... (not even falling into the forementioned "nerd" lot) but I could do without all the excessive graphic violence.

Posted by: litelysalted at January 20, 2007 9:56 PM

Just finished watching it, and I had to come back to Pajiba to check and see if the review was accurate enough to my reaction. I hated the violence, the amputation, the stitching, the blood. I wanted the fairytale sequences to be more extended, and yes, Ofelia came off as too stony a character. And it was through her that I had the biggest problem with the film: if she is told that she's the reincarnation of a princess, why does she accept it so quickly, and so silently? A more believable character would have some sort of conflict with her 'quest' rather than go ahead and take it upon herself...and, in my opinion, would be a better heroine.

The best comparison I can make is Dave McKean's Mirrormask, which had a similar plot, but instead of being a brutal, bloody, and cringe-inducing journey, was quirky, fun, and seemed to be more intellectual. None of the task's given to Ofelia seemed to have any constancy with Pan's claim that they would prove her essence "intact".

Needless to say, I can't deny that Pan's Labirynth, for all its brutality, was a beautifully executed and engaging film. I would definitely recommend seeing it, though perhaps only once...I certainly don't feel like going back to it in the near future.

Posted by: entr'acte at January 21, 2007 12:26 AM

Anime is art of the highest order. People who criticise it usually dont know much about it. Anime is not cartoons and is not animation or comic book hero antics. Anime reflects the fundamental split in Japanese society since it was defeated by the Americans and their Russian Allies in WW2. Anime uses Japanese imagery of sex, death, gore and blood sure but it is artistically portrayed in exactly the same way that Goya portrayed beauty through death and gore.

Posted by: QU"AI SHAI at January 21, 2007 2:40 AM

this is a film about spanish society and the brutal and cynical way that womens political identities were suppressed and continue to be stifled under the socalled democracy in place today. It is obvious that the blood and guts is interrelated with the Spaniards love of blood sports and cruelty. The journey of the girl is the journey of a virgin raped by the society of Spain. The mythical creatures are thinly disguised Catholic Priests - the disfigured and twisted appearances only indicate how the sexually depraved priest hood of the Catholic Church served to warp, destroy, and soil the purpose of Women. The knife that she must steal is the sexual act, the blood shed is her menstrual blood. We are all complicit, we are all guilty.
This is a film to be shown to children not just to adults.
We must make this compulsory viewing in all of our schools.

Posted by: Magda at January 21, 2007 2:48 AM

I saw this movie last night- I agree with the child-eating monster fucking up your dreams. The movie had two different plots (or so it seemed) that you never imagined would go well together, but they just do, somehow. And there's a tiny femenist streak in the movie, which is a bit of a relief.

Posted by: saga at January 21, 2007 1:38 PM

I, most likely wrongfully, see quite a few biblical relations with this movie's plot. Does the girl not avoid temptation and become accepted into the kingdom of God to greet her dead relatives and imaginary friends?
I would also rest easier if there had been more mythical creatures beyond those smeared all over the advertisements... the same advertisements that failed to inform me the entire movie was subtitled.

Posted by: jim at January 22, 2007 1:19 AM

I found Pan's Labyrinth to be a fascinating juxtaposition, and Dustin's review was well-written.

I have to agree with points #1 and #2 from lauren, though. The kid was stony, and I don't have any idea why she chose the left door, other than maybe to portend that the silly twit is going to totally disregard the fairies in every way.

Also, litelysalted makes a good point about the gore. At least half of it was gratuitous.

Posted by: brutus at January 22, 2007 11:10 AM

On a side note -

It was nice to learn from the Captain how to deal with a waiter the next time he brings out the wrong bottle of wine ;-)

Posted by: brutus at January 22, 2007 11:16 AM

On the choosing of the door other than the one the faeries point to:

In my opinion, it's more of a foreshadowing of Ofelia's response to her final task. She follows what her heart says is right, and ends up choosing the right door (the object won there is the one Pan wants her to get, the one that is to be used for the final task).

At the end of the film, she refuses to carry out the task Pan lays out for her, instead following her heart to protect the baby. This is what saves her and allows her to return to her kingdom.

It sets up a contrast with the Captain. In the scene after the doctor disobeys him, the Captain confronts the doctor for not blindly following his orders. The doctor replies that blindly following orders is for people like the Captain.

Though Ofelia does make the mistake of becoming enchanted by the appearance of the food (and what's a quest tale without at least one mistake?), she does not blindly follow orders, and ends up better off for it.

On another note, to the dude who is sad that the advertisements for the movie didn't let him know the whole thing is subtitled - what exactly is the problem with that? "By the way, people who don't want to read - don't see this movie."

Posted by: Melissa at January 22, 2007 1:35 PM

It was nice to learn from the Captain how to deal with a waiter the next time he brings out the wrong bottle of wine.

Ohhhhh so wrong.... Heheheh.

Yes it was gratuitous, and I personally don't believe it added anything to the film. Not that I'm some kind of prude or likely to be associated with any kind of "family" organization... And I don't disagree with Dustin's review. However I just happen to be particularly squeamish and unfortunately it made the film less enjoyable for me.

I wrote a quasi-review on my own site (which is not nearly as thoughtful or eloquent as the one you'll find here) which elaborates my feelings on the topic.

Posted by: litelysalted at January 22, 2007 4:54 PM

litely:

Just read your blog. Nice.

"El Cantante. I believe that's Spanish for Pure Shit."

Greatness.

Oh - did anyone else like the michael jackson cameo in the middle of the film? Thought he did a great job munching on the CGI fairies.

Posted by: brutus at January 22, 2007 6:51 PM

I also was unaware that this movie was in Spanish. If I had known that, I probably would have waited for a dubbed verion. It's just not the same, reading a movie instead of watching it. Otherwise, it was a decent film. My favorite part was the second task, as there wasn't as much talking(reading), and I could pay more attention to the details in the cinematography.

Just a note, I also liked Hellboy and Blade. I also feel the need to defend The Cell. It's one of my favorite movies. Though, that may be due to the affinity I share with the persona of the antagonist.

Posted by: Xavier at January 22, 2007 7:37 PM

"...The Cell. It's one of my favorite movies."

I just died a little inside.

Posted by: brutus at January 23, 2007 9:33 AM

I was holding my breath, but... What can you expect from someone who complains about having to read a movie?

Ahhhh, so that's how Michael Jackson keeps his skin so milky white. Fairies! I should have known...

Posted by: litelysalted at January 23, 2007 1:56 PM

As for the complaints about the gore, I understand what y'all are saying. This film is not for the squeamish. But that brutality and violence sure is memorable, isn't it? Why is it necessary for her stepfather to completely bludgeon that guy's face in with that bottle? Answer: to establish him as the purely evil force that he is. At that point in the movie the jury was still out on him. Good lord, that guy is right up there with the absolutely worst villains I've ever seen on screen. There is simply nothing redeemable about him.

Posted by: Rob at January 24, 2007 2:01 AM

A few comments from a neophyte:

1) Violence: Although I spent some portion of the movie covering my eyes and peaking through them, I felt the violence was absolutely not gratuitous. It clearly and succinctly represented the horror of the world and its denizens at the time (and still). My children (ages 10 - 16) were not overly disturbed by the violence itself, and we discussed the realism of such brutality and its context on the trip home.

2) Shoes: Oh, I would be very surprised if the pile of shoes were not overtly meant to evoke the holocaust. I can't imagine anyone not missing that visual reference, especially del Toro.

3) The Pale Man: Was absolutely terrifying and if I had not been in the back row of the theater, I am quite sure I would have climbed over my seat and hidden behind it. His virtual facelessness clearly represented the brutality of the mindless primal apetite that results in actions and events described by us as "evil". It would seem that the pale man was acting according to his nature, just as the brutal dictators of the last century did. The difference between them might have been that the pale man, like other (animal) predators, may not have had a choice.

4) Ofelia's choices: I thought that Ofelia's choice to ignore the fairy's direction and opt for a different door was meant to reflect the inate knowledge of the reborn princess, and I agree with the "blind obediance" references above. She acted as her heart directed her.

5) Discordant note: Have said the above, we thought that her choice to eat the grapes was awkward. She had not been sent to bed without dinner that night, but the night before. She shouldn't have been hungry. Fresh fruit, in this time of rations was likely not available, so the luxury of grapes may have been her temptation. However, it still seemed a little out of nowhere for a child so preternaturally wise, brave and determined. Perhaps if del Toro had prefaced it a little better...

6) Stony faced: I do not disagree with this observation, but I have met children who would behave identically in such dire and dramatic circumstance, so it did not trouble me. This girl has suffered a great deal. Her father's early death (she was clearly a daddy's girl), her mother's disengagement, a childhood occupied by war. She seemed realistically withdrawn and stoic.

7) Mirrormask: Ironically,too funny. As a HUGE Neil Gaiman fan, I was VERY disappointed in Mirrormask. As we got into the car to leave the theater after viewing Pan's Labyrinth, I said, "This is the movie that Mirrormask SHOULD have been."

8) Feminism: Good point. I hadn't specifically realized the female-empowered note to the movie. In retrospect, all of the men (even the doctor) seemed impotent next to the captain, whose machismo would have been (and ultimately was) pathetic if it weren't so brutal. Pan's Labyrinth relies on the strength and grit of Ofelia and Mercedes and their willingness to do what they must. As the Captain points out, Mercedes has discovered his weakness: Pride. His arrogance allows her to exploit her position to secure food and intelligence for the resistance. I have seen this "feminine cunning and steely determination" in many hispanic films. It is similar to the portrayal of pioneer women in literature and film. Perhaps the culture of machismo creates this sort of schism in the culture of genders. Out loud, Mercedes avers that she is a coward - yet her actions prove that she is anything but.

Posted by: 5grrls at January 24, 2007 8:08 AM

Hey, can you guys watch the SPOILERS in your comments???!!! Thank you.

Posted by: janiac at January 24, 2007 4:34 PM

I guess I'm the only one who walked away digusted. This is a story about a mad girl. Pan does not exist, the fairies, the whole shebang. Ofelia can't cope with her new life and creates a mythical world that mirrors her own, but in a context she prefers. The story of the war, the captain and her mother, mercedes and the rebels seem dross drenched in blood, the work of a masochist dilettante. So thanks, del toro, for conviencing legions of impressionable people that violence against girls is ok if it's beautiful.

Posted by: PanSham at January 24, 2007 5:27 PM

Well wouldn't it be nice to see a Spanish film that *doesn't* have a monstrous/problematic father figure?

I wasn't particularly freaked out by the fantastical monsters - it was the actual real-world brutality that made me whimper. Beautiful film, sure, but anyone who's serously thinking of showing this to kids needs their parenting licence revoked.

Possibly linked to the un-creepiness of the fantasy creatures was the fact that the fantasy sequences just weren't very well thought out. They were too short, there was no real motivation behind any of it, it was never particularly clear what Ofelia would have to gain from becoming a princess in a world she's never been to - I'm sure there are better ways of depicting a tragically lonely girl's death wish.

What really bothered me was the fact that Ofelia just naively accepted everything - a seven-foot temperamental, potentially violent fantasy creature-father figure (as witnessed in the carving...) tells her she's a magical princess and she must follow orders to escape to her "real" home, away from the grasp of her temperatmental, definitely violent stepfather - and unblinkinly she accepts.

WTF? No question about what would happen to her real mother and unborn brother, she just wants to live a fairy tale life. Again, it would have made more sense if there had been more of a hint of her suicidal tendencies for example.


Again inexplicably, the tasks changed along the way. Had I been told that after breaking explicit rules in an integral task I was - what the heck! - given another chance, I'd seriously be wondering what does this creeptoid want from me. If I've already proven myself unworthy why not wait for the next potential princess to stumble along and leave me to my fantasy-free, cruel world as suitable punishment?

The film looked good, the real world characters worked for me (even if a certain someone recovered from multiple stab wounds a bit too easily), and I suppose the fantasy sequences served as useful distractions, allowing for a bit of break from the really pervese goings on in the non-magical world. So yes, it is worth watching, but it's far from a masterpiece.

Posted by: Spongie at January 24, 2007 11:05 PM

I must say I am a big fan of many-a-thing fantastical, and Pan's Labyrinth has already pulled me in, even though I have not seen it yet. My only concern is the use of Spanish. Does it make viewing difficult? Or does it simply add to the atmosphere? I would also like to ask anyone on this forum who knows when this Movie will be coming to Australia (i.e. Townsville, North Queensland)? I am really looking forward to it.

ANd one more thing. From the trailers that I have seen, the story seems to draw a lot on folk lore (the faery/fae/fairies) and similar myths (like Pan from Greek Mythology). If anyone is at all like me and likes to read enthusiastically in the fantasy genre, I recommend The Ill-Made Mute (Part of the Bitterbynde Trilogy), my favourite book of all time. If there ever was a way to make this trilogy into movies (god forbid) this seems the way to go.

Posted by: Fallow at January 24, 2007 11:16 PM

Don't know about Townsville, but I saw it in Perth over the weekend. Maybe check arthousey type cinemas before the Greater unions etc.

I take it you haven't seen many subtitled films before? It's not particularly hard - obviously it's a slightly different viewing experience when you don't just automatically understand what the characters are saying, but I'd say having a foreign language (be that Spanish, Swedish, Japanese) does add to the ambience.

You might even enjoy a subtitled movie more than you would if you actually udnerstood the language - if a script sucks a foreign viewer does not necessarily feel the full force of it. ;-)

Posted by: Spongie at January 25, 2007 4:50 AM

No, I've seen heaps of movies with subtitles. Just wondering if, in this case, it is difficult to view. Obviously not :) I also heard that they have, only recently, done a wider release in america. So, I'm guessing, it will take a while to get to Townsville (Dreamgirls is only coming here by 1st February). But I will gladly wait!

Posted by: Fallow at January 25, 2007 6:04 AM

Wow, was going to take my mom to this, but hearing the violence (I was wondering what the R was for) I think I'll wait and go by myself! Thanks, commenters, for saying what none of the reviews have.

Posted by: Gebba at January 27, 2007 3:03 PM

I just saw this and really really loved it. A couple of points in defense of the film - the violence was brutal but not in any way gratuitous. Maybe it's my own obsessive love of fairy tales, but her reactions seemed perfect to me. She's a daydreamer. Clearly she was hoping something like this would happen to her. Don't little girls still wish to find out they're really proncesses? The eating of the fruit had nothing to do with being hungry. This is a common fairy tale theme people. Irressistable (read: enchanted) food that lures and traps the hero. Her single-mindedness about eating the grape makes it clear it isn't mere hunger.

Posted by: mm at January 27, 2007 8:03 PM

I have come to realize what i love the most about the film is Ofelia's sense of courage without fear. She was awesome! The whole film for me was amazing and i can't stop thinking about it.

I highly recommend a stiff drink before you go and see it. 10 out of 10.

Posted by: Martyn Grace at January 27, 2007 10:20 PM

I loved this movie, I think everyone who can, should see it. Even my boyfriend liked it, and he's 22 and usually only likes war movies. I highly recommend it, and it was actually a very pleasant surprise because I didn't expect it to be so captivating. It gets better once the story unfolds a bit further into the movie and before I knew it I was crying towards the end. Although it may not move you to tears like it has for me, all in all I think most people would find it a very well rounded fairytale movie with a bitter-sweet ending.

Posted by: Chrismarr at January 28, 2007 2:52 AM

Hmmm. I came away stunned also, but reflecting back i think now that the violence is a little gratuitous. Yeah, after the rabbit hunters scene we understand that captain=evil. I dont need to see it that explicitly, or any of the further overdone violence to get that beaten into my head.

As for why Ofelia ignored the fairies: wasn't there a picture in her magical book of the little girl covering the middle door with her hand, as if to say "not this one"?

Lastly, I think Magda's comments on this story detailing the loss of virginity to a violent spain bears further thinking. Captain is the authoritarian male, and he ends up shooting/penetrating the innocent heroine. Interesting also are the playing against each other of Ofelias mother (a weaker woman subjecting herself to the Captain for self preservation) and Mercedes, who also serves the captain, but for a more 'noble' purpose. I think alot could be said about the women in this movie besides just that "there was a small feminist subplot" (Does that just mean there was a woman not bending over to take it?).

Liked the movie once, will probably not watch it again without a definite fast forwarding through all the violence

Posted by: bp909 at January 28, 2007 11:42 AM

Wow, why all the complaints about the gore? Ftr, each "gorey" scene lasted a few seconds on screen. Close your eyes, and it's gone. I hate gore, but it really, really, really establishes the extreme moral flaws of the captain and his crew, AND the brutalities of the war happening around Ofelia's story. Sure, it's disturbing to see half of that in there, but the entire movie is creepy; I didn't go in there expecting the entire thing to be butterflies and rainbows. If anything, seeing things like a man's face get banged in with a hammer made the scenes with Pan a bit more wonderful (and a nice change to breathe), because it creates a beautiful set of contrasts. For every extreme gore scene, there is a gorgeous 'nature' panorama that restored my mood completely.
I love the mixture of gore and beauty in this film. It made me really feel scared, startled, amazed and bewildered like few films have in a while.

Although, I think part of the massive "ew, gore!" reaction is due to the fact that the only time US movies consistently have gore is in the Torture-Slasher clunkers to hit the cinema lately (of which the same 20 people are seeing, over and over). Oh well...


All in all, great movie, honestly. If you're bothered by having to read Spanish, well.. learn to multitask? I find that once you get used to watching subtitled films, it becomes much easier. These days I hardly even notice a film is in subtitles, since reading/watching is second nature to me (particularly from my numerous anime movie viewings..).


As for Mirrormask, I loved it, but I do think it could have been.. "more", I suppose. I see where it wanted to go, and I love it for what it accomplished, and appreciate it for what it was trying to do.


For me, Pan's Labyrinth is a vision that was perfectly executed and realized. I see the dream, I feel the dream, I'm a part of it, and that's just a great feeling to get from a movie.

Posted by: AD at January 29, 2007 3:10 AM

I loved this movie...
Just wanted to say that I too notice the picture in the magic book of Ofilia covering the middle door telling her "not this one". I'm glad someone else noticed this and it wasn't in my imagination.

Posted by: Bec at February 2, 2007 1:04 AM

I enjoyed listening to the Spanish voices it made the film all the more magical for me.And of course Maribel Verdu is the loveliest creature!
The brutality of the war imagery is the reason children should not go and see it.
The tacky ending is brilliant - corny, but just right!

Posted by: Katalinkipinki at February 2, 2007 2:39 PM

devil's backbone, a great movie. so too is cronos, and blade 2 but frankly i'm still scratch'in my head on all the hoopla spun on pan's labyrinth. if watching a sadist for 2 hours is wonderful then good luck. as i walked out of the theater i felt i had been set up by a manipulative trailer. this is a dim film that never could get its feet off the ground, a film time will forget quickly regardless if it wins an academy award.

Posted by: rob at February 2, 2007 11:16 PM

I didn't find the ending tacky or corny at all. In fact I found it almost unbearably heart-wrenching; I don't know if I can fully explain why without spoiling things.

Posted by: nova at February 4, 2007 6:25 PM

Nova, I know just what you mean. Tacky and corny? Even though it is..."different" from other endings, that's what makes it so incredibly beautiful. And if you pay attention in the beginning very closely,the end brings the whole story full circle in the most stunning way.

Posted by: Julila at February 5, 2007 3:33 PM

I just saw Pan's Labyrinth and I was mesmerized, not by the CGI effects but for the story and how powerful it is, in cruel times fantasy is the only way to escape the harsh reality.

Posted by: goldend at February 8, 2007 1:31 AM

I saw PL on the weekend and loved it. It was beautiful to look at and the child actress' calmness and dignity were a refreshing change from the hysterical gurning from (many of) Hollywood's child actors. I'm still not sure how much of the story happens in the 'real world' and how much only happens in Ofelia's head, but I adored it!

Except: torture. Why torture? Nasty.

Posted by: Louise at February 11, 2007 10:32 PM

You have to be kidding me. PL is dark, predictable and boring. How to explain the scene where Mercedes practically disembowels Captain Vidal who is next shown running out of the barn, then sewing his mouth up?! Surely he would not have survived the vicious knifing. I guess suspension of continuity is part of the fairy tale too, huh? The girl dies in the end.

Posted by: Flesh Eating Trimspa at February 14, 2007 11:13 PM

I just this movie tonight after The Number 23 and The Queen. What a depressing movie. I don't mind an adult fairy tale, but God, almost every good character in this movie gets murdered, including the prepubscent heroine! I mean, c'mon, a movie with more than one scene in which captives are brutally tortured or maimed? Who were they marketing this to? And it's not enough to have Ofelia brought back to life or entirely into the magic world; no we have to continue to see her dead body, just so that we know that this was all just some schizo-dream, and that she really was murdered by the Capitan. I don't mind happy endings, when there is a narrative context or need fulfilled by it. But this was such a downer.

Posted by: sva1994 at February 28, 2007 9:53 PM

I just saw Labertino last night. I enjoyed it, but I found it to be a shade too predictable. I went in with only the barest notion of the plot (Girl moves to country and finds fairyland), but I knew what was going to happen at least 5 minutes ahead of time at every major point in the film. I liked it, but I can see now why the academy might have picked another film for Best Foreign Film.

A few points though:
Bitching about subtitles. Really people, we are BITCHING about SUBTITLES? Wondering if there is a dubbed version? So you have to read the movie. Big deal. It's a foreign film. Dubbed versions are just terrible. The dialogue is messed up and the mouthes and words don't match.

The violence was far from gratuitous. There were only a few cases where the violence wasn't implied by a cut.

I actually thought Ofelia's acting was good. I saw her as kind of a strange little girl, wrapped up in a dreamworld. When that dreamworld seems to come true, she accepts it. Perfectly natural.

I did like this film, and would recommend it, but I wish the Obvious!Foreshadowing had been toned down just a little bit.

Posted by: nyltiak at March 1, 2007 8:45 AM

I finally got to see this movie and I have to say that I loved it.
It wasn't what I expected from the previews, that's for sure.
I was really quite suprised by how brutal it was in places. I wouldn't say it was gorey, but it was done in a way that really, really made me cringe.
But it was also done in a way that made the movie better.
Ofelia's desire to leave everything behind and live in a fairy tale kingdom is understandable and believable, as are the lengths she will go to to get there.

Posted by: denka at March 4, 2007 1:19 AM

I saw this movie the other week and I loved it! Definitely the best I've seen in a while, everything (actors, script, CGI, music) was brilliant and extremely moving. Some of the violence was a bit brutal, but nothing nightmare-worthy, and I'm usually a big wuss when it comes to the squeamish stuff. The only complaint I had at the time was when Ophelia ate the grapes (standard fairy-tale mistake), but I guess that ties in with the theme of blindly following orders. The Faun can been likened to the fascist Captain Vidal, in that he ordered Ophelia not to eat anything off the table, despite her hunger, and without any explanation as to why. Her rebellion against the Faun's instructions and her ability to think for herself led to her salvation, a very positive message for the rest of us.

Posted by: Tania at March 6, 2007 12:35 AM

This movie sucked. I can't believe that I'm the only reviewer to say so. To begin with, it was subtitled in Spanish. Nothing on the movie poster or previews said anything about it being subtitled. Shouldn't that be a requirement? I mean, what if I can't read? Or my eyesight wasn't good enough to be able to decipher it? I missed many of the cool special effects because I was too busy trying to read what the people were saying. I go to movies to WATCH, not to read.
If I want to read a story I'll buy a book.

But then they started in with the brutal violence. Holy Crap!! Once or twice was bad enough, but it occurred over and over throughout the movie. Even at 8 bucks a ticket or whatever it was, my wife and I finally just got up and walked out. What a total waste of a rare date night.

I haven't been this disappointed in a movie for years. It takes a really $hitty movie to make me get up and walk out of the theater. And its really too bad, because it had so much potential to be a great movie. Call me when it's released in ENGLISH and without all of the unnecessary gore.

And furthermore, I was appalled at those reviewers that suggested showing this movie to children. Forget having your parental license revoked. Anyone that would show this movie to a child should have a wine bottle shoved into their eye socket.

Posted by: Bad Dog at April 11, 2007 3:37 PM

A stunningly horrible film which has somehow managed to convince a number of people that hopelessness is the central feature of a "fairy tale."

The movie couldn't decide which foot to come down on and decided a dismal combination would work, which it didn't.

Subtitles? Grow up. Not every film worth seeing happens to be in badly dubbed English. I've seen enough movies that the subtitles were fine, thank you.

But back to the pointless, cruel and bleak film. For a moment. The plot set up an opportunity to go one of two ways -- the real world vs. myth (In the truest sense of the word) which it failed to follow, lacking vision and courage. Instead, it traded triumph for a cheesy-ass quasi-parable of deep despair vs. an even deeper despair and madness.

People who see the world as the movie defined it cannot see the world as it is, or can be. The movie stands as a stark tribute to the lack of heart, not the presence of it.

Posted by: DrMojo at May 19, 2007 1:11 AM

WoW!... The guy that made Pan's Labyrinth is the same one that made Blade II. I never would've guessed. Del toro really pulled a 180 between those two movies. Must admit, didn't know who was (or I just still is) Mr. Del Toro, but I'll try and check out more of his films. Minus Hellboy, which I saw...and kinda liked.
Thanks for all the wonderful comments.

Posted by: loneferret at May 20, 2007 8:11 AM

I think it was a good story but it was a little too depressing for me. I originally thought it was going to be a fairy tale but the movie focused more on the war and so it was almost like watching a history movie in high school. Too many main characters died and it wasn't very magical or enthralling, it was rather sombre or dreary. For one, I'm still confused why so many awards was given to this movie since there really was no special effects. The only good thing was possibly the costumes or make-up of the faun and what not, but Lord of the Rings had a lot more special effects and cinematography. I don't think it was a bad movie but I think it got too much credit for a regular, average movie.

Posted by: sean at May 21, 2007 11:35 PM

That was such a lame horror movie, it was almost like a child's movie. Freddy vs Jason was way better as well as the Grudge. I mean what was with the whole war scenes and fairy tales, where was all the hacking and slash, what a bore. My younger brother generally doesn't like horror movies but that was pretty tame, I mean there wasn't any chainsaws or anything. Hey what's the name of that movie up for all the nominations, it's in spanish with subtitles or something, I heard that's suppose to be better than this one. Oh and why did this one have subtitles if it was spoken in English? I must say I've seen far better romance movies, Pan's Labyrinth was just an average comedy. I was suspecting a good drama and all I got was a musical.

Posted by: Xerythropes at May 22, 2007 12:09 AM

Pan's Labyrinth is such a good movie. I definitely enjoyed the hell out of it. I was surprised though, because i was unaware that it was an adult film. I only saw previews for it on T.V. and then my hubby rented it, and I fell in love. There was a specific scene that surprised the hell out of me (one with a father and son) because, like I said, I didn't know it was an adult "fairytale" story. Definitely enjoyed the movie, and will take you guys up on TDB... sounds like it was a good movie.. will have to check it out. thanks!

Posted by: angella at June 6, 2007 2:04 PM

Ever since I read this review, I've been impatiently waiting to get my hands on this film.

And.... what can I say apart from WOW.

Having read a couple of the comments just now (Ok, ok, *most* of them, because that's how sad I get), I'm surprised by the claims of gratuitous violence. However, the comment that surprised me most was "Pansham"'s.

"This is a story about a mad girl. Pan does not exist, the fairies, the whole shebang. Ofelia can't cope with her new life and creates a mythical world that mirrors her own, but in a context she prefers. The story of the war, the captain and her mother, mercedes and the rebels seem dross drenched in blood, the work of a masochist dilettante. So thanks, del toro, for conviencing legions of impressionable people that violence against girls is ok if it's beautiful."

It's so surprising to me that Pansham seems to 'get' one of the interpretations (it's no conincidence that the girl is named Ofelia, a variation on Othelia), but fails to grasp it on the most basic level. Violence against girls is *not*being encouraged here. Rather, if we take the ofelia-is-mad interpretation, we are being shown the detrimental effects of violence, and how it can cause someone to retreat into a mystical, imagined world.

Posted by: Nina at June 20, 2007 4:53 AM

I couldn't even finish the movie. After the Captain shot the doctor, I'd had enough of the violence, death and depravity. The real world is horrible enough and I don't need to see those manufactured graphic images and imaginary plots to realize that. After reading the spoilers, I'm really glad I didn't waste 20 more minutes of my life getting depressed about a FAIRY TALE. There are plenty of other things to be depressed or outraged about.

Posted by: Jasmine at June 24, 2007 8:22 PM

I couldn't even finish the movie. After the Captain shot the doctor, I'd had enough of the violence, death and depravity. The real world is horrible enough and I don't need to see those manufactured graphic images and imaginary plots to realize that. After reading the spoilers, I'm really glad I didn't waste 20 more minutes of my life getting depressed about a FAIRY TALE. There are plenty of other things to be depressed or outraged about.

Posted by: Jasmine at June 24, 2007 8:25 PM

To all of you who thought the violence was too much: You are aware the movie is Rated R "for graphic violence," right?

Posted by: Jen at July 31, 2007 5:17 PM