free counter with statistics Painted Veil, The | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

paintedveil.jpg

Hatred in the Time of Cholera

The Painted Veil / John Williams

Film Reviews | January 2, 2007 | Comments (13)


The Painted Veil tells the time-honored story of boy meets girl, boy impulsively asks girl to marry him, girl reluctantly agrees, boy catches girl cheating, boy sadistically punishes girl by dragging her to the cholera-infested interior of China.

Actually, that’s just the first half of the story, and if that were all there was, I’m not sure I’d recommend the movie. The Painted Veil never quite comes together in a way worthy of its individual talents, but its second half is intermittently forceful enough to redeem it. Based on a novel of the same name by W. Somerset Maugham, the story is set in the 1920s and focuses on the relationship between British bacteriologist Walter Fane (Edward Norton) and his wife, Kitty (Naomi Watts).

The first third of the movie is simplified and melodramatic, partly because it’s an homage to filmmaking of an earlier period, but also because it has to establish several emotional connections and betrayals in very little time. We’ve barely met the main characters before they’re getting hitched. We do know that the feminist-before-her-time Kitty has been threatened with expulsion from the family dole if she doesn’t find a husband in short order. And we know that Walter is a starchy, reserved Brit in the classical mode, though the only contact he has with Kitty before he rashly proposes to her is at a crowded party, where they share a glance and a dance.

Having married Walter (and then moved with him to Shanghai) sheerly out of fear, Kitty quickly becomes restless and falls into the arms of the more passionate Charlie Townsend (a stock role that mostly wastes the talents of Liev Schreiber). Walter is soon onto the affair (not difficult, since his wife conducts it in their marital bed in broad daylight), and when he volunteers to help study/eradicate a cholera outbreak in a remote part of the country, he uses the moment to give Kitty a chilling ultimatum: she can either go with him or suffer the stigma of being served divorce papers.

In a desperate attempt to improve her fate, Kitty tries to convince Charlie to leave his wife and marry her. His response, in short: “No.” So Kitty packs up and accompanies her husband on a sweltering two-week trip to their new home, a place where Walter plans to, in equal proportion, relieve the suffering of the cholera victims and increase the suffering of his wife, her dainty disposition to be severely tested by germs, solitude, and pointed emotional neglect.

I spent the first 30 minutes wishing that director John Curran (for whom Watts also played an adulterer in We Don’t Live Here Anymore) had cast British actors in the lead roles. Watts and Norton do serviceable work with the accents, but they’re not the most believable Brits. (In contrast, Toby Jones, as Waddington, the only other of their countrymen left in the small village, is a perfect fit. His supporting performance is the movie’s most consistent pleasure.) Once things pick up, though, it’s hard to imagine better choices.

It’s easy to forget that Norton is our best young actor by a good stretch. (Sorry, Leo.) Since his burst of great performances in Rounders, Fight Club, and American History X, he’s settled into long periods of inactivity and the occasional mediocre project (Keeping the Faith, The Italian Job). This quiet vehicle won’t do much to restore his visibility, but he’s brilliant in it. Watts is his equal, but it’s Norton who has the trickier role. The plan he executes to punish his wife for her transgressions is so severe — at times bordering on psychopathic — that it threatens to become ridiculous.

Before it does, though, Norton somehow keeps us tethered to the essential goodness of his character, which allows us, against odds, to believe Watts’ transformation when she begins loving her husband despite his continued mistreatment of her.

For most of its duration, it’s easy to see The Painted Veil as a badly dated story about a man’s right to maniacally punish a woman for her sins. Instead, it somewhat miraculously becomes a moving love story, the most anachronistic aspect of which is how seriously it takes people’s responsibilities to each other. The movie’s climactic moments — which include a few satisfying twists and turns, and a terrific speech by a nun (Diana Rigg) who compares her love with God to an old marriage — make it easier to accept its earlier stretches of undercooked exposition.

(Author’s note: A reader has pointed out that Naomi Watts was born in the UK. This is true, and deserves noting. But she moved to Australia when she was 14, and she doesn’t “read” British. I think my larger point stands — her natural accent is a light Australian one — but I gratefully accept the fact-checking note.)

John Williams lives in Brooklyn. He’s an editor at Harper Perennial and a freelance writer. He blogs at A Special Way of Being Afraid.


Pajiba! The Vampire Slayer | Pajiba Love 01/02/07



Comments

Thanks for a spot-on review. I was fidgeting for the first hour or so, and the guy behind me was in full-bore, head-thrown-back snore. But while the first part dragged, I couldn't criticize the cinematography or the stunning locations, which kept me busy until the action kicked in. Ed Norton, who usually sort of turns me off despite his talents, finally clicked for me. Naomi Watts and (you're right) Toby Jones were great, especially in their whiskey-soaked exchange. Diana Rigg has come full circle in a nun's habit, of all things, and was predictably fabulous.

I'm a bit conflicted, since the first hour was so hard to sit through...but the last half-hour was completely affecting.

Posted by: Cris at January 2, 2007 10:18 AM

1. norton is an american. watts was born in great britain and had lived there for 14 years. if she is not a brit, who is?

2. no doubt norton's role had been enhanced from the novel, but make no mistake according to the book and the script this was the transformation story of kitty who was on every page of the novel, her husband walter died 2/3 into it and was in the background most of the time. you may up-play norton and his role, but watts remains the lead and kitty the main character of this story.

Posted by: steandric at January 2, 2007 2:29 PM

Watts is Australian, if I'm not mistaken. Yes, I know too much about celebrity gossip.

Posted by: Samantha T at January 2, 2007 3:32 PM

Liev Schreiber continues to be criminally underused in Hollywood. It's quite depressing. As for Norton, he's a brilliant actor who makes some odd decisions for movies. But I'll never forget the moment when I discovered him and knew he was something special - the final scene in Primal Fear. Still gives me chills.

Posted by: TK at January 2, 2007 3:38 PM

Oh hell yes, TK. That final scene in PF made me buy the movie. I have to (soft of) agree with John - Edward Norton, while a bit older than him, easily surpasses Leo. Don't have anything against Leo, as he is great in his own measure. I am reluctant to call any specific actor or actress "the best of" anything, as no one has the perfect track record, IMO. Nevertheless, I have always found Edward Norton to be at the top of the pack.

And no, Liev doesn't get the love he deserves. If he wasn't with Naomi, I'd totally have his babies. Oh, okay, I know he doesn't know I exist. I'm just sayin'.

Posted by: Daphne at January 2, 2007 8:44 PM

Uh-oh! I meant, sort of, not "soft of." Hee.

Posted by: Daphne at January 2, 2007 8:45 PM

samantha & john williams: as steandric said, naomi watts was born in britain, raised there until she was 14. her mum still lives there. she has lived in the united states longer than she has lived in australia, & a director from montana discovered her. her british accent was as good as toby jones. & of course toby jones is british too.

quit reading gossip, which is more often than not wrong. you have the right to your own opinion (like you did not like the film or the acting), but you do not have the right to your own facts.

& john williams...you ought to go back to writing film music.

Posted by: john at January 2, 2007 9:04 PM

i went to see the film a second time w/a brit. he said her accent was perfect for the time & place. just as her american accent is perfect. what she says is that it is easier to take on an accent than to speak in her own tongue (lightly australian, you call it) because one can get into the character better. if you had not thought she was australian, you would have thought she was british like toby jones. just like many seeing her in the ring for the first time thought she was an american actress. an australian critic compared her facility w/accents w/meryl streep.
btw, she even speaks some gaelic (on inside the actor's studio.

when people don't like a film, they make up things from gossip to buttress their judgment, & then try to justify their mistake later when they should just admit they were mistaken.

she 'spoke british' in wyvern mystery w/derek jacobi, & may 'speak british' in cronenberg's eastern promises about a midwife exposing an international sex ring in london next fall.

Posted by: john at January 2, 2007 9:13 PM

holy crap john, obsess much?

Posted by: markus at January 2, 2007 9:54 PM

Painted Veil is an old fashioned story, only in the sense it is set in a time not our own. Male power and the terror of gossip were facts, like motor cars and hair styles. (I'm not sure where JW is getting that Kitty was a feminist. She's a spoiled, not totally self-inflicted airhead in both the movie and the book.) What, we can't look at the past and learn more about ourselves? Okay, no more movies about WWII. Yay!

In comparison to Toby Jones, Edward Norton was not a Brit, but otherwise he was ideally cast. I completely bought him as a partly sweet, partly dangerous, and mostly strange bacteriologist, who would marry someone like Kitty, of all people, and expect it to turn out well.

I had a problem with Naomi, though. She's a fine actress, but lacking in charisma. The role needs charm, or, oh something to stop you wondering "what does he see in her?" for the first hour. Without it, there's no tension, just a sense that Kitty is getting what she deserves.

I loved the way Naomi and Edward handled the dialogue. They obviously watched a lot of English films from the 1930s to prepare.

Posted by: Janis Mann at January 2, 2007 10:47 PM

John, please note my "If I'm not mistaken" qualifying language. I'm a lawyer - I hedge for a living.

Posted by: Samantha T at January 3, 2007 12:19 PM

i hate naomi watts.

that is all.

Posted by: razh at January 5, 2007 2:22 PM

I am in love with Walter Fane. I thought that they would butcher this movie. I sincerely thought that it wouldn't live up to the books expectations. I like this adaptation. They weren't spot on on all things but throughout the film the books essence was there. Atleast now reading the book, I have a face to my Dr.Fane.

Another great adaptation to a really great novel is Wuthering Heights. Heathcliff -acted by both Ralph Finnes (recent) and Sir Laurence Olivier (classic)

Posted by: carrie at June 16, 2007 10:30 PM