free counter with statistics Orphanage, The | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

orphanage3.jpg

Caves for Coal-Carts

The Orphanage / Ranylt Richildis

Film Reviews | January 12, 2008 | Comments (43)


In my fusty little Ranylt world, even a mediocre Spanish horror movie makes for a more effective horror movie than pretty much anything generated on this side of the pond, at least these days. Before Dario Argento went to seed in the early ’80s, viewers mainly counted on the Italians to produce great Southern European thrillers—and, despite a few damp patches like Jaume Balagueró’s Darkness, or Alejandro Amenábar on a bad day, Spain has blazed a trail since the mid-’90s as the current go-to nation for effective Euro-chillers, picking up where Italy left off.* It’s probably safe to say, in fact, that Spain is keeping the Euro-horror genre healthy in the West while the Asians work their own occult potions over in their neck of the woods**. As someone who’s always preferred her horror movies with a European tincture, my appreciation for the Spanish industry is solid enough. It was Amenábar who got the pot boiling with Thesis back in 1996, and not Guillermo Del Toro—a Mexican who sometimes works with Spanish settings, history, talent and cash—but it was the ghostly ambience of Del Toro’s The Devil’s Backbone, and his fascination with the abused child as a horror device, which have permeated several recent Spanish horrors (and a few Italian-Spanish co-productions like the first-rate I’m Not Scared by Gabriele Salvatores). Whole essays have been written about the symbol of the abused child in Spanish and Italian art in the post-fascist era, so it’s not as if Del Toro invented it; he did, however, appear to revive its onscreen popularity as an ooky trope in the Southern Europe horror-film industry, and Juan Antonio Bayona’s The Orphanage is the latest Spanish trip that exploits our knee-jerk tendency to goosepimple whenever dead children emerge from the shadows.

Set a horror movie in an orphanage, and dead children are bound to figure. Belén Rueda plays Laura, a woman who purchased the orphanage that cared for her when she was a child. Laura has a kindly doctor-husband (Fernando Cayo), an adopted son named Simón (Roger Príncep), and earnest plans to turn the old orphanage into a home for half a dozen special-needs children. Simón, on his part, has a thing for imaginary friends—within the first few scenes, we learn that Simón’s original set of playmates has been supplanted by another five or six local ones, including a boy named Tomás who follows Simón and his mother home from a cave by the sea. When Simón disappears, what follows is a parent’s harrowing plunge into the waters of desperate measures and straws-grasping, iced over by all the best ghost-story fancies: clanging pipes, creaking doors, mediums, ratty dolls, secret rooms, and the creepiest kid’s party committed to film since the nanny-hanging scene in The Omen.

In this type of movie, everything rests on two things: the atmosphere the director is able to conjure up, and the protagonist’s performance. If you’re willing to let the film enfold you, Bayona’s atmosphere will lack for nothing, and Rueda’s Laura is probably one of the most convincing grief-stricken parents in a spook film since George C. Scott’s fragile widower in The Changeling. In both films, grief opens the door to curiosity, and Rueda uses her gaunt frame and face to good effect as she chases shadows real and ephemeral, emitting a lunatic maternalism that isn’t completely centered on her actual son. Like most Spanish ghost movies, The Orphanage is low-key in nearly every department, from lighting to dialogue to event. It offers only a few moments of true frenzy, relying mostly on its overall mood and the drama of the mother’s loss to build tension and work your affective knobs and buttons.

As far as horrific pitches go, I’d highlight the film’s establishing shot (in which little girls playing a Spanish version of red-light/green-light demonstrate just how creepy a kid’s game can appear through a composed frame), and the way this astonishing shot is reproduced (in a somewhat contrived fashion, admittedly) towards the film’s end when Laura takes it in her head to summon dead orphans with blackberry flan and a parent’s full attention. I’d also highlight the séance at the film’s mid-point—a structural accomplishment, in terms of narrative, which mimics the way The Changeling builds everything around its famous automatic-writing scene. I’m a sucker for a good séance on film, and The Orphanage provides a memorable one, complete with an off-putting medium (Geraldine Chaplin—of course), the latest PSI equipment, and keening children’s voices firm on communicating their intense state of pissed-offness over being made dead by fell caretakers.

The Orphanage, which was co-produced by Del Toro, is no The Devil’s Backbone or I’m Not Scared—it lacks the technical granite that underpins those two films, and it also lacks their superior scripts and general unity of effect. And though I’d never condemn a genre film—especially horror—for its plot-holes, The Orphanage has its inconsistencies, sacrificing a few goats of logic here and there in its desire to please the gods of uncanny; if you demand pristine plot engineering in your scary movies, 1) you’re a more discerning horror buff than me, and 2) this is probably the worst fault you’ll find in The Orphanage, beyond its proudly derivative internal elements. This film isn’t interested in innovation; like a Tarantino, Bayona is playing cinematic DJ with a huge store of catchy chirps and buzzes lifted from other sources—and if I can get off on the musical remixes of Erlend Øye or De Facto, then in fairness I should be able to get off on the same principle when it’s applied to film. The Orphanage fuses elements from three acclaimed horror predecessors into one movie: it has The Devil’s Backbone’s Spanish orphanage setting, The Changeling’s dead, disabled children as vengeful ghosts and that riveting séance centrepiece, and The Haunting’s troubled heroine fatally obsessed with an old mansion. In fact, of all three movies, I’d say The Changeling informs The Orphanage the most; fans of the former can play match-the-ingredient while watching the latter, and probably enjoy the experience in so far as both films share a great deal of classic atmospheric devices—not to mention atmosphere. The Orphanage plays with nothing we haven’t seen before, but by and large it plays with them well, and results in a capable recombination with only minor, genre-specific problems and an overall less-than feeling when compared to some of its sister films.


* Apologies to guys like Jorge Grau and Michele Soavi for my gross rhetorical oversimplification.

**Apologies also to Nick Willing, the British director of Close Your Eyes (2002), the best formal giallo produced since the Italian heyday.


Ranylt Richildis lives in Ottawa, Canada. She can usually be found sneezing in college libraries or dropping chalk in lecture halls, but she’s somehow managed to squeeze in a film or two a day for the last decade.


In the Name of the King: A Dungeon Siege Tale | First Sunday



Comments

Spot on Ranylt, you've entirely affirmed my desire to see this. I must say, as a horror fan with a relative lack of discernment (I enjoy Argento and 80's American slasher flicks with equal intensity), this new wave of 'Euro-thrillers' is a blessing, especially in the face of Rob Zombie's re-imaginings and the ever-present torture porn fiascos. And to anyone that hasn't seen Close Your Eyes, for shame!

Posted by: Smokin at January 12, 2008 1:05 PM

Well. You knocked this one out of the park, and you can bet I'll be checking this one out.

I'm curious about the boy's performance... one of the things that has struck me about horror films with child actors is there is a distinction between the kids that are genuinely good actors, and the kids who just stare or cry in an effort to appear spooky or scared, but without any actual emotion.

Damn. That was run-on city, wasn't it.

Posted by: TK at January 12, 2008 1:15 PM

The review is right on target. I saw this on Thursday night during a free premiere. Many of the people that showed up had not idea what the movie was about and that it would be in Spanish with subtitles, but as soon as the movie began you could feel the atmosphere taking hold of the audience. I liked it a lot--found it to be interesting, well-paced and really scary at certain times, but not particularly groundbreaking. Afterwards, I was discussing the movie with a friend who loves the likes of Saw and Hostel who said that she could not believe that horror movies could be this good "without torture in them." I am seriously reconsidering that particular friendship now.

Posted by: Marifer71 at January 12, 2008 1:19 PM

Well, I've been waiting for yall to review this since I saw it on the 1st!
I went to see this because it was definitely not in the torture-porn genre. I like horror movies, I do, even though my girlfriend doesn't believe me. She dips into the films with gore; I prefer suspense.
Anyway, I thought it was a good film. There were a few plot holes, yes. And I thought the ending could have been a little more subtle (did they really need to spell it out the way they did?). But it was intriguing, beautiful, and definitely worth the price of my ticket. It made me jump a couple of times and there was a point that made the audience go "oh . . . gross" and many people put down their forks with a clatter (I don't want to spoil anything. You'll know when you see it.) That counts as a good movie for me, so well done.

Posted by: Sharon at January 12, 2008 1:21 PM

I can't find anything negative to say about about the film or the review.
That sucks.

I'll see it and not like it, out of spite.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 12, 2008 1:42 PM

....maybe this movie would have worked better if the lead female character was a dyke, ummmm, I mean a lesbo. What I'm trying to say is I believe this movie could have been more interesting with some lesbian characters.

Posted by: Pookie at January 12, 2008 2:00 PM

It doesn't surprise me that people went to this movie and were surprised that it was a foreign-language film. I don't know how many people noticed, but they actually released a trailer for US audiences that didn't include dialogue. Pretty sad that people have to be tricked into seeing movies with subtitles. Lord. And if I recall correctly, they did the same with Pan's Labyrinth.

Posted by: Lannie at January 12, 2008 2:47 PM

Awesome. I'll grumble a little about the plot holes and quickly get over it, if this movie's as good as you say. I love me a good horror movie, especially one that seems like it's not going to be too gory (I'm of the opinion that tons of blood do not make up for a lack of tension).

Posted by: Cady at January 12, 2008 3:02 PM

Lannie, I just read your comment as mine was posting; it IS sad that people have to be tricked into watching movies with subtitles. My favorite movie is Wong Kar Wai's "2046" and I'm CONSTANTLY trying to get someone to watch it with me. Their first question is always, "Well, does it have subtitles?" And once I tell them it does, they suddenly realize that they have something to do Saturday night, and just won't be able to make it. Same with "Das Boot." :(

Posted by: Cady at January 12, 2008 3:06 PM

Screw people who won't watch subtitled movies. Don't even bother trying to argue with them. They will never see 2046 or Pan's Labyrinth or Das Boot, which is punishment enough.

I recall a fairly flame-ish exchange on this subject in an old Pajiba column. Apparently, anyone who can read and comprehend subtitles quickly enough to follow the movie is an elitist, so watch yourselves.

Posted by: Jerce at January 12, 2008 5:16 PM

Euro-chillers, Euro-horror, Euro-this, Euro-that, wtf? This is almost as worst as the academy awards category "best foreign movie". Can't we just recognize a good movie when we see one, without slapping a label on it that basically says "but it is non-american"? I cringe when i see the Apple trailers homepage, filled with "comedy", "action" and "foreign". Foreign? What kind of genre is that? Does the US audience need a warning that a movie might not have the US vibe to it? I guess so, why else do they remake foreign movies to americanize it, instead of presenting the, usually superior, originals. Heck, you would save a lot of money that way, just hire some good voice-actors (personally, i'm more the sub titles guy, but that's just me) and release it.

Posted by: Arthur Dent at January 12, 2008 5:24 PM

*siiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigh*

Should I make a disparaging reference regarding the correlation between lack of reading skills required to comprehend subtitles and Wal-Mart...?


*ponders, deeply*

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 12, 2008 5:29 PM

My God, RanyIt. You actually made BarbadoSlim quiet, if only for a moment.

BarbadoSlim. With nothing bitchy to say. At all. Of all people.

I am really scared all of a sudden.

P.S. I was suckered into that subtitles miasma Jerce mentioned (I believe it was about The Host), and I have to disagree with that assessment. It wasn't that people who read subtitles were elitists, it was that some jackass thought that just because someone didn't dogmatically prefer subtitles over dubbing, that made them a drooling idiot. In that case, the asshole was indeed being an elitist, but not because of the subtitles directly.

To reiterate, the act of reading subtitles doesn't make you an elitist. Acting as if doing so makes you 200% better than the rest of humanity, however, does. I mean, it is just READING ENGLISH ON A SCREEN, not deciphering the Rosetta stone, for Pete's sake.

Posted by: Vermillion at January 12, 2008 5:32 PM

I mean, it is just READING ENGLISH ON A SCREEN, not deciphering the Rosetta stone, for Pete's sake.

Have you been, like, out lately? To a public place? Like maybe to a nearby Wal-Mart?

There, see what happens when you hesitate, Barbado? I beat you to it! Neener!

Posted by: Jerce at January 12, 2008 5:45 PM

Ok, am I experiencing some serious deja vu right now, or did we have a similar conversation re: subtitles, in the comments section of Pan's Labrynth? I do believe we did.

Anyway, subtitles don't bother me, but scary movies tend to. I have an almost child-like imagination, and horror films stay with me for days...and nights. Having said that, I do want to see this....wish me luck, y'all, with psyching myself up.

Posted by: Kolby at January 12, 2008 6:47 PM

I can't wait to see this movie! It just got it's more wide spread release last week, so now I only have to drive 30 miles to the nearest theatre playing it instead of 400. I have read a few reviews that focus completely on the plot holes and inconsitnecies, and it was really nice to get a more well-rounded one.

Posted by: Kay at January 12, 2008 7:27 PM

Got it. So when I get around to seeing this, I'll be put off by the plot holes. I'm ok with that. So long as the actors are good and the director makes it creepy I'm ok with that.

Unless, of course, my wackadoo brain somehow makes the plot holes and inconsistencies add up to a perfectly logical experience, then I'll absolutely love it. This is coming from someone who loves Exorcist II: The Heretic, and not in a so bad it's good way.

Posted by: Robert at January 12, 2008 9:19 PM

I swear, Ranylt, sometimes I have more fun reading your reviews than I do with the movies they're addressing. Actually, most of the time.

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at January 12, 2008 9:33 PM

i have to agree with Kevin l , reading your reviews ms richildis, is a real kick..they need to pay you more money!!

Posted by: pasadenamike at January 13, 2008 12:04 AM

Subtitles are, like, totally for losers.

Posted by: Moron O'Malley at January 13, 2008 12:31 AM

BSlim - I would LOVE to have a conversation with the Missus. Any woman taken as your bride has got to be a special lady. I must know her secrets.

Kolby, I too have an issue with horror movies staying with me. Been like that ever since I was a little girl. Good luck!

Regarding Subtitle-Gate - I thought it all started when someone innocently asked about them, and some condescending ass (I thought it was a woman, actually) thought it proper to insult her for asking such a question. So....I'm guessing the verdict was that subtitles > dubbing?

Posted by: Daphne at January 13, 2008 1:55 AM

Cady: Love love love 2046, and I have the same problem with that movie. NO ONE will watch it with me. Can't they understand how breathtakingly beautiful that film is?

Posted by: Rachael at January 13, 2008 9:41 AM

I've been a fan of Spanish horror ever since stumbling across The Devil's Backbone at a film festival several years back. The title got me in the door -- the movie provided that rare thrill of a new discovery. So I've been looking forward to this, and RR's review has whetted my appetite even further. And what's not better whetted?

Regarding 2046, I haven't yet seen it, even though I'm fairly sure it will blow me away. In a weird way, I'm holding onto the anticipation. It's a mirror image of the pang of jealousy I feel when I turn someone new onto A Confederacy of Dunces -- they're about to experience it for the first time, and I'll never get to do that again.

Posted by: sansho1 at January 13, 2008 9:47 AM

don't nobody want to do no reading at no show. them people that made this movie should have told everybody that some reading was involed with the movie. I ain't going to see no movie, they won't get my dollars.

Posted by: Pookie at January 13, 2008 10:52 AM

I love the Changling--it's a movie more people should know about. Glad you mentioned it in the review.

Posted by: ecp at January 13, 2008 11:23 AM

C'mon Pookie, I bet you'd shell out some bucks for a subtitled movie if it had dykes and lesbos in it.

Then again, so would I.

Posted by: TMax at January 13, 2008 11:56 AM

Well TMax I must admit I'm partial to the tenderness that woman on woman love provides.

Posted by: Pookie at January 13, 2008 12:30 PM

El Orfanato was a decent film, but I was incredibly annoyed by the ending.

*SPOILER*
I mean, the woman finds out that she has (accidentally) caused the death of her child and kills herself. And then we get this EVERYTHING'S ALL RIGHT -shit. Even the husband is smiling. What the hell.
*END SPOILER*

Posted by: Hakobus at January 13, 2008 12:47 PM

"And though I'd never condemn a genre film--especially horror--for its plot-holes..."

This is where I completely disagree. I suppose it depends on how smooth the other elements of a film are brought together and also how gaping those plot holes might be, but if if I feel like I'm having to make grand leaps in logic to make up for lack of plot, then I can't help but lose some appreciation for the film as a whole. Direction and screenplay are the backbones of any great movie, and while I'm willing to forgive certain smaller missteps or lost-trail endings in an otherwise interesting and well-thought out piece, if there are glaring things left unfinished, I can't say I'm a fan.

I'm going to be unpopular by saying those are some of the reasons I didn't like Pan's Labyrinth. (And also, the fact that the lead girl was being played by a block of wood. Though I suppose it's hard to show any emotion in the face of so much CGI. Ha!)

Anyway, that's the way I see it.

Posted by: WhatThe? at January 13, 2008 3:58 PM

Hm. Now I don't know what to think. Several of my friends thought this was too predictable to give them a scare of any sort, and griped that it didn't bring anything new to the table. Seeing dead people? Scary looking kids? Been done. Quite a few times. I don't think I'm too excited about this one.

Posted by: tt_marie at January 13, 2008 9:30 PM

Well done RR for freaking me out with a review alone. And just before I needed to go into my basement and do some laundry. I may have to wait until tomorrow to do that. I don't mind plot holes in horror movies. I'm such a scary movie wuss that plot holes can be the only thing saving me from getting way more scared than I should be from a damn movie.

As for subtitled movies, since my life and family schedule only allow me to see one or two movies in the theater a year, most of my movie viewing is done at home. And then, due to personal priorities in life, my only TV to view them on is a 13" set that is going on 15 years old. Subtitled movies don't work very well on that medium, making them low priority viewing in this household. Less waiting time for the rest of you, I guess.

Posted by: katy at January 14, 2008 12:28 AM

Good luck, Colby! Horror movies torment me for weeks, too. I can't handle them- I just like to reading Ranylt's reviews.

Posted by: demondoll at January 14, 2008 1:36 AM

Fantastic review, and you referenced some of my favourite horror movies within it. Although: no UK release date as yet so I'll have to procure it by... other means.

This may sound odd but I actually find horror movies with subtitles more affecting than those without - especially the more mediocre ones. It takes a lot for me to purely sit and watch a movie, a good film (I watched Brokeback Mountain for the first time last night and near burnt a hole through the shirt I was ironing because I got so engrossed) I can sit and watch but even then I tend to get fidgety - I play games on my phone, read the paper, doodle, file my nails... anything to keep me semi occupied. With subtitled films I'm forced to actually keep my attention on the screen for the entire movie (unless it's French), in the case of horror films it means I actually stay in the mood of the movie making them scarier and hence: better.

I'm aware that I'm rambling but still: No. Freaking. UK. Release. Date.

Posted by: Alex the Odd at January 14, 2008 10:00 AM

I honestly can't wait for this movie. I just recall it being compared to Pan's Labyrinth and I was overcome with excitement. I loved the hell out of that movie and now quiver everytime I hear Del Toro's name. *quiver* Count me late on the bandwagon, but it all goes back to the not so much discovering my roots, but the embrace of all that it means to be a part of La Raza.

Posted by: ScarletKnight at January 14, 2008 10:38 AM

I'm with you all on the 2046 love. That is such a fantastic movie. I'm a solitary movie watcher, though; I prefer to be by myself, with no distractions.

As for this one, I'd been tempted to see it, and the comparisons to The Changeling have sold it. I make no secret of my adoration of that flick, or just how creeped out I get (after more than 20 viewings) by that sceance scene, or more accurately, the immediate followup. Reel-to-reels just look scary to me now.

Posted by: pinkcheese at January 14, 2008 10:53 AM

The story has indeed been done before, but this didn't prevent me from really enjoying this movie. I was totally engrossed. I even involuntarily cursed out loud at one of the "make you jump" moments. When it was over, I realized that I totally should've seen what was coming, but I didn't. I had gone in expecting more horror, but was really pleased that what I got was suspense.

Posted by: Smello at January 14, 2008 11:53 AM

pinkcheese-I'm with you on watching alone, especially the really good movies because I get so tired of family members (who I otherwise adore)saying "What does that mean? I'm lost" and "Oh jeez Mom, not another THINKING movie!"

Posted by: lateformyfuneral at January 14, 2008 12:59 PM

lateformyfuneral - I watched Jane Eyre on Masterpiece Theater with my daughter this weekend, and she only asked me what was going on 3 or 4 times. I wanted to sing a Halleluiah chorus, 'cause that was seriously a miracle (especially for a 9yo.)

Posted by: pinkcheese at January 14, 2008 3:20 PM

Lateformyfuneral, pinkcheese: I developed my (thankfully now completely broken) habit of narrating throughout movies from growing up with my Mother, she's one hell of a smart woman but has the attention span of a gnat when it comes to movies - basically requiring a constant string of dialoge from me: "You see that's important because of what she said earlier in the flower shop, and look see? That's relating to the time she went fishing with her Dad when she was a kid..."

I did this unconsciously for years but stopped after the well meaning death threats of my friends.

One of my pet-peeves is someone walking in when you're half way through a movie they haven't seen and then sitting down to watch. Even if they don't ask what's going on I find myself tensed up waiting for the inevitable question - because I can't just say "oh he's mad because they're getting married" or some such, I have to go right into the back story of every character. It's even worse when it's a series because I will explain the history and relationships between every single character that comes on screen thus I'm not actually watching the program either.

It's a compulsion. I can't help it.

Posted by: Alex the Odd at January 15, 2008 5:07 AM

Alex, I feel the same way!!! I get overwhelmingly uncomfortable when I'm watching something and someone comes in during the middle of it and starts to watch it. Sometimes I just start the movie over.

I can't wait to see this movie! I think I'm going on Sunday. I love subtittled films b/c I actually have to pay attention.

Posted by: Mistress Violet at January 17, 2008 1:24 PM

AtO, Now that you have watched BBM, may I suggest that you read Jeremy's review? As much as I was deeply affected by the movie itself, his review helped me to appreciate BBM even more. It was at that moment that I experienced my conversion to Pajibahood. I knew that I had found my Web-based cinefile home. You are one of the inhabitants whose comments I most treasure. We simply must do cocktails. I have a gin that makes the most potent and tasty Martinis in the universe.

Posted by: rudy at January 17, 2008 1:47 PM

Spot on review. Also nice command of subject. Watched "I'm not scared," last night. Thanks for recommending i, you are good!

Posted by: Jim Kinney at January 30, 2008 1:39 PM

I wouldn't call this a horror movie. It's a melodramatic ghost story. As such, the plot holes really kind of spoiled it for me. And as someone mentions above, the over-the-top ending was a little saccharine for my tastes...

Good little film, but I hope this doesn't turn out to be film of the year (as some are already saying).

Nice review, btw.

Posted by: Swineshead at March 31, 2008 4:10 AM