norbit.jpg


A $33 Million Opening Weekend — And Deserving of Every Shiny Cent

Norbit / Dustin Rowles

Film Reviews | February 9, 2007 | Comments (109)


Author’s Note: The following review was inspired by Eddie Murphy’s recent appearance on James Lipton’s “Inside the Actors Studio.”

In the many years that I have been toiling in this noblest of professions, I have never once been graced with the immense joy I experienced upon witnessing the Eddie Murphy comedy Norbit. Indeed, if I may humbly suggest as much, “comedy” is a misnomer here. It is a film about love, liberation, and the miraculous things that happen when wine-cooler bubbly passes through one’s intestines and escapes one’s sphincter with a glorious, reverberating sound. Humorous, it is. But the jokes are present only to make the pain of heartbreak less bitter upon our palates and less disruptive to our digestive systems.

Eddie Murphy’s career is unique for its remarkable variety. He is a comedian known for pushing boundaries, though he is the rarest of exceptions: A gifted actor who proves that talent and box-office success are not mutually exclusive. I offer you these fine examples: Daddy Day Care, The Nutty Professor (and its sequel), Doctor Dolittle (and its sequel), and even Holy Man, in which he portrays a television evangelist who takes America by storm. Well, I say to you: Since he broke through on “Saturday Night Live” almost 25 years ago, he has taken my heart by storm.

Here, his character is born Norbit Albert Rice. He is a soft-spoken, slightly retarded — or, I should say, mentally challenged — African-American with a meek disposition. But as the Gospel of Matthew long ago suggested, it is the “meek [who] shall inherit the Earth.” And that is the challenge for this young man. His character is poor, raised in the Wonton Orphanage by a kindhearted, racist Asian man (also played so adeptly by Mr. Murphy) after being thrown from a moving automobile by his unseen biological parents. He was then left alone and destitute outside of this small-town orphanage. But as Sting once wrote, “I’d rather be poor than a fat man stuck in the eye of a needle.” Truer words have never been spoken.

There are many adjectives I could use to describe Norbit: splendiferous, scrumpgasmic, magnerific. But there is only one word that truly captures the essence of this film, and it is luminous. I could offer a wealth of other descriptors, but allow me to briefly lay out the plot, so that you may draw your own conclusions, because it is the narrative — which unspools slowly and deliberately, like a flower in the springtime — that truly makes Norbit a masterpiece of the 21st century.

We learn early on that the title character has a soul mate in his fellow orphanage-inmate Kate, portrayed by China Anderson in the character’s preadolescent years. As children, Norbit and Kate are inseparable. And like other big-screen couples — Woody and Diane, Meg and Tom, Freddie and Rachael — Kate and Norbit do everything as one, even going as far as “pooping” together before later reading their own impromptu vows under a tree.

Sadly, however, Kate is adopted, leaving Norbit alone in the orphanage. Soon, however, he meets Rasputia, an overweight girl with a vicious scowl, who saves Norbit from teenage ruffians, who would deign to destroy Norbit’s sandcastle. Rasputia brings Norbit home with her and offers her own family as his, honoring him at suppertime with the best part of the turkey: its ass.

As we move to the present day, Norbit and Rasputia are wed. It is quickly revealed, however, that the marriage of Norbit and Rasputia is not blessed with either matrimonial or carnal bliss, despite Rasuputia’s empty assertions to the contrary. Rasputia, in the current day, is a 350-pound behemoth of a woman with “ass dimples that look like potholes” who displays her rolls of cellulite like a rap star might flash his gold teeth — as a sign of status. She is a menacing cut of a woman, all the more so for the subtle implications her character makes about obesity in modern-day America. There is no mistake, either, that her name is inspired by the Russian mystic who helped to take down the Romanov dynasty and, in a way, Norbit is her Anastasia.

We learn early on that Rasputia is having an adulterous affair with her power-tapping dance instructor (Marlon Wayans) (“I will power-tap you”), a revelation that is as gutting as anything I’ve seen since Diane Lane’s illicit liaison in Adrian Lyne’s Unfaithful. I was transfixed by the actress playing this morbidly obese enchantress, intrigued with the beauty and subtlety of her obscene, guttural disposition, and it was as much a surprise to me as it will be to you to learn — as I did when the credits began cruelly to roll — that she, too, is played by none other than Eddie Murphy himself. Is there no end to this man’s talent?

Norbit, however, is powerless to leave Rasputia. He is trapped in a dead-end marriage with a woman so despicable that she would run her sporty sedan over his dog because he readjusted the positioning of her car seat, which made it impossible for her to move around in the car without honking the horn with her gargantuan bosom. Norbit’s marital subjugation is made all the more untenable once Kate (Thandie Newton) re-enters the picture, returning to town to take over the orphanage with her fiancĂ© Deion (Cuba Gooding Jr.) in tow. Kate and Norbit reconnect after 30, and their chemistry is intoxicating. (Literally. I briefly passed out and woke up blurry-eyed, with a pounding hangover, which I could only attribute to Brobdingnagian directorial talents of Brian Robbins [Good Burger, The Shaggy Dog].) However, the 350-pound elephant in the room remains Rasputia, who is hellbent on erecting obstacles to the blossoming love between Kate and Norbit, or Korbit, as they will long be known in tabloid circles.

Rasputia repeatedly uses an ebonic Tribbianism, “How you doing?” at first for comedic effect, but as the narrative unfolds and the story of Norbit’s life takes us to deeper, darker and more mysterious places in our own psyches, that “How you doing?” takes on another meaning all together, something akin to Jack Nicholson’s ominous “Here’s Johnny!” in The Shining. I wouldn’t dare attend Norbit alone, not without someone to latch onto during the terrifying parts, of which there are many, notable among them Rasputia’s visit to a water park (“It’s like an amusement park, only I ain’t got to leave to go to the bathroom”) and a scene that features her wearing a two-piece and washing her car to Kelis’ “Milkshake,” a moment loosely inspired by a similar scene in the equally sublime Date Movie. In both instances, the effect was so haunting that I was forced to hide my eyes from the screen for a few seconds.

Through it all, this powerful, completely unpredictable story of forbidden love and the lengths to which people will go to make a relationship work is held together by the Oscar-nominated talents of Eddie Murphy, who creates a character that will go down in the annals of cinematic history as one of the more complex creations: He is part Karl Childers from Sling Blade, part Weird Harold, from the television cartoon “The Adventures of Fat Albert,” and part Screech, from one of the greatest syndicated television programs of the last generation, “Saved by the Bell.” It is a delightful combination, like a concoction of pickles, grape jelly, and marshmallow cream spread between two slices of white bread. And with the help of Eddie Griffin, who reprises (and perfects) his pimp character from every movie he’s ever made, the farcical wedding-scene climax in Norbit is a divine comedy of errors that will leave you on the floor gasping for air (as I was). Indeed, in his fragile old age, it is precisely the kind of inspired farce that I’d encourage Neil Simon to avoid, lest the envy drive him to an early grave.

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. He lives with his wife in Ithaca, New York. You may email him, or leave a comment below.


Hannibal Rising | Pajiba Love 02/10/07



Comments

I bow down to your masterful sarcasm, o wise one.

Posted by: Mara at February 9, 2007 6:35 PM

Dustin?


Are you okay? It's just that I worry about your sanity sometimes.

Posted by: Greer at February 9, 2007 6:35 PM

And this is why Eddie doesn't deserve an Oscar.

Posted by: SA at February 9, 2007 6:39 PM

haven't read the post yet -- just wanted to thank you for the nod to spinal tap and commiserate with you over your job, at times. you deserve hazard pay.

Posted by: melia at February 9, 2007 6:47 PM

Hmm. Didn't expect Sting to turn up in a Norbit review...

Posted by: fenchurch at February 9, 2007 6:51 PM

James Lipton better watch out for his job. That was magnificent.

Posted by: stardust_savant at February 9, 2007 7:04 PM

Do movie reviews get Pulitzers?

Posted by: anikitty at February 9, 2007 7:08 PM

"wearing a two-piece and washing her car to Kelis' "Milkshake," a moment loosely inspired by a similar scene in the equally sublime Date Movie"

Not that I saw Date Movie, but I believe the scene you're referring to was ultimately inspired by the chesty chick washing a car in Cool Hand Luke.

Posted by: Cris at February 9, 2007 7:14 PM

Thanks, Dustin! I guarantee this review was funnier then the movie and it was free to boot. Once again, thanks for taking the hit for the rest of us.

Posted by: Rob at February 9, 2007 7:53 PM

The fact that I still want him to win an Oscar for Dreamgirls makes this, as well as most of the rest of his career, even sadder to me. I am going to stick with happy memories of the old SNL James Borwn sketches before the fat suit tragedies began.

Hot tub! Gonna make ya sweat!

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at February 9, 2007 7:57 PM

The movie: Pure shit.

The review: Sheer brilliance.

Posted by: Brie at February 9, 2007 8:26 PM

" divine comedy of errors."

that, my friend, is truely magniferic.

ps. i'm fairly sure that if murphy actually wins the oscar all the signs of the impending apocalypse will have aligned. better take your canned goods down to the basement.

Posted by: cris at February 9, 2007 8:49 PM

Fantastic.

Although it makes me a little curious to see the movie.

Posted by: Max at February 9, 2007 8:53 PM

Dustin, I am a huge fan, but still had my doubt's you could pull it off for an ENTIRE review...

"...and, in a way, Norbit is her Anastasia."

That's where you hit the bull's eye!

Posted by: mfg at February 9, 2007 9:20 PM

Good job, Dustin, old bean--two birds with one hand, as they say on the hunting moors. You managed to skewer not only the movie but an entire style of film reviewing that's had it motherf%cking coming since forever.

Posted by: ranylt at February 9, 2007 9:21 PM

There is no mistake, either, that her name is inspired by the Russian mystic who helped to take down the Romanov dynasty and, in a way, Norbit is her Anastasia.

I wondered why, whenever I saw the trailer, I suddenly felt like I was beaten, disemboweled, poisoned, castrated, and drowned all at once. Then, once the ad was over, I would start laughing maniacally as I survived another attmpet on my life. It was really weird.

By the way, the review was scrumtrulescent. As they usually are. If there was an "Inside the Pajiba Studio", you would be most at home on it.

Posted by: Vermillion at February 9, 2007 9:28 PM

i`ll lay odds this will be number ONE at the boxoffice this weekend . Thats the reason i want to get outta here!! p.s. sweet review

Posted by: pasadenamike at February 9, 2007 10:18 PM

I could actually picture Lipton saying every word -- how brilliant! I imagine the Spinal Tap-esque review would read simply: Norshit.

Posted by: haughty at February 9, 2007 11:17 PM

Damn, Dustin. You've been throwing down the gauntlet lately with your reviews. What's going on? Has the Paul Haggis hate unleashed some unknown or previously untapped, awesome snarktasm from the deep recesses of your mind? If so, I must thank PH for triggering such......I can't even find the word to describe the brilliance.

It's getting to where I have to take breaks from reading your reviews because of laughing so hard.

Then, once the ad was over, I would start laughing maniacally as I survived another attempt on my life.

Oh, Vermillion. You slay me with your vivid imagery.

Posted by: Daphne at February 9, 2007 11:21 PM

So, whether it reflects on the writing quality, my own intelligence, or what I suspect to be both. There were parts while reading this review that I got into it, and almost believed, like a ray of sunshine poking through the clouds, that Norbit was a masterpiece.

Amazing.

Posted by: Eric at February 10, 2007 12:48 AM

Magniferic.
I'm crying with joy

Why is Eddie Murphy compelled to sign horrible contract packages that showcase him beautifully in one movie, then humiliate him in the next? Where the hell is his manager? Or script-reader? Or the person that keeps his meds? I mean...

Posted by: demondoll at February 10, 2007 1:18 AM

Wait, I made up a different word. I meant magnerific- sheesh.

Posted by: demondoll at February 10, 2007 1:21 AM

this is the Eddie Murphy weekend for me, i just saw Dreamgirls and tomorrow nite it's Norbit...oh whoa is me!

Posted by: paris at February 10, 2007 1:58 AM

Eddie Murphy will not be denied! If his fine acting in Norbit doesn't make him a shoe-in for the Oscar, then what hope has anyone else?

P.S. Dustin, I hope they are paying you a lot of money. You not only had to sit through this crap movie, but you also turned out an awesome review.

Posted by: Kris at February 10, 2007 3:19 AM

Careful now, before you know it you'll be quoted on movie posters and DVD box art world wide...

Posted by: Dev at February 10, 2007 3:27 AM

I could hear James Lipton in my head while I was reading this. Nice!

Posted by: Sara at February 10, 2007 12:32 PM

rubbing it on a lil thick dont you think?? remember, everything in moderation, including eddie murphey movies

Posted by: pajiba diddy at February 10, 2007 1:21 PM

Dustin, thank you for taking one for the rest of us. I had not planned on seeing "Norbit", since even the trailers made me wince in agony, but I had no idea how bad it could be until reading your review.

Your review, however, was awesome.

Posted by: Camille at February 10, 2007 1:21 PM

Dustin:
I sent you a beer-soaked, spontaneous (see: stupid) email earlier this week that has embarrassed the hell out of me ever since. I've been trying to find a way to apologize for such a ridiculous rant, and after reading this magnifique review and busting my sides with laughter, I can finally exhale and say
1) thank you for not responding to my nonsense;
2) after reading all the great work you've put out this week ALONE, I feel guilty as hell for having diverted your attention from doing it any longer than I did.
If you see this, please forgive my unwarranted intrusion on your email address, and I'll leave the writing to the ones here at Pajiba, who do it just fine thank you, & limit myself to a comment once in awhile, like maybe, "This review ROCKED, dude!" (ooh, it even hurt me to read that):
Forgive my seemingly irrational intrusion on the otherwise excellent comment site, fellow readers.

Tony in SC: Sadly, I don't believe I received your beer-soaked email. We've been bombarded with literally hundreds of spam emails a day, so I may have missed it amongst all the Cialis offers. Shame, too. I love drunken rants.

Posted by: Tony in SC at February 10, 2007 2:39 PM

Hey, Good Burger fucking ruled! Lay off Eric, man, It has all been downhill since he single-handedly won the match against Bronx Science. Lay off!

Posted by: C-Dog at February 10, 2007 3:06 PM

I am totally stealing the word "scrumpgasmic." As in, "Dustin, this review was SCRUMPGASMIC!"

As someone mentioned in the "Dreamgirls" comments, Eddie Murphy needs a good director to adopt him and save him from himself. I really get the impression that he feel like this is what he is best at, and it's just so sad and wrong.

Posted by: Edith at February 10, 2007 3:29 PM

Dude, I could hear Lipton's voice in my head, awesome.

I see this is another film graced by the Thandie Newton seal of shittasticness., her presence on any film is guaranteed to add at least 50% more suck.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 10, 2007 4:50 PM

[ala Fight Club]

Tyler Durden: Ok, any celebrity.
Narator: I'd fight James Lipton.

Posted by: keith at February 10, 2007 5:42 PM

okay. I have to admit that the preview does make me laugh sometimes, due solely to the part where the fat suit Eddie Murphy is washing the car to those insipid pussy cat dolls.
But seriously WHY does everyone keep saying he shouldn't get an Oscar for a really good movie just because he was in a different one that really blew?!?
Philip Seymor Hoffman? TWISTER. The extent of that dialogue? "Run! FASTER!!!"
Halle Berry?!?! BAP?!?!?! Seriously guys. The oscar should be given based solely on the performance. Not past history.

Posted by: eliza at February 10, 2007 8:16 PM

Eddie Murphy doesn't want to be saved from himself. Dreamgirls was a fluke in a Pluto Nash career.

If the oscars are based on performance, Jackie Earle Haley gave THE best sup actor performance this year.

Posted by: Kate at February 10, 2007 9:01 PM

"I imagine the Spinal Tap-esque review would read simply: Norshit." (haughty)

Brilliant. Likewise for the review.

Posted by: Diana at February 10, 2007 9:12 PM

Dustin,
Just now read (rather, got the courage to check) your response to my earlier post, and I'm as ecstatic as a little schoolgirl that you didn't see it! (fyi, it was a request to submit an as-yet unwritten article concerning an absolutely unique, original subject - that Iraq war thing is just f***ing wrong! - as if enough hasn't already been said about the state of this shitty administration in much better English than I can muster), so consider yourself spared the waste of time it was destined to be even before I hit the 'send' button - between the Sundance hustle, the new 'roundup' dates, and that now-legendary 'Tearjerker' list located just a bit below this article, you have currently got to be the hardest-working man in the movie-review business. That the quality of it all has been of equal excellence to the quantity is merely a humble gift I-oh, okay frak it, enough of the butt-kissin'...
But did want to add one thing concerning this entire sorry Norbit affair: even not having seen Dreamgirls myself, just from what I've read from various sources regarding Murphy's performance-

how much more of a contender WOULD he had been for the Oscar, if the business, the media & all concerned had only kept this latest travesty a secret until after the Awards itself?? Or does anyone think it makes any diff at all at this point?

Eliza made a great argument, but I believe Kate (sadly) nailed that very reason in the first line of her comment.
Thanks for the outlet, guys.

Posted by: Tony in SC at February 10, 2007 10:06 PM

I'm sorry, lemme be more specific in my above hypothetical, then I'll leave everyone alone:

Let's just imagine that Norbit didn't exist, at least yet; that Murphy had the sheer, solitary strength of his Dreamgirls performance ALONE to even be aware of in the public consciousness at this point- what difference, if any, would it make in the voter's minds? Would he have more of a chance, less of chance?

Dammit, I worshiped Eddie Murphy as the 'new thing' when he came out with 'Delirious' in the 80's (I was 26) and honestly believed at the time that his fresh persona was first introduced that he would be the 'one to beat' for giving us such an incredible 'jolt' of much-needed new, energetic talent not only then, but 20 years down the road, meaning NOW, like I depended on Pryor and Carlin to deliver for the last multiple decades. Boy, I would have lost hard had I bet long-term on on Eddie.
I still wish him the very best, but if it were me in his shoes, I'd be so (justifiably) angry as all hell at the timing of all the promos & seemingly rushed release of this crap, at really the most crucial point in this Oscar race so far. (But again, I don't know if maybe the dumbass HIMSELF is the one behind all the rush promotion & release of Norbit, in which case he deserves whatever the hell he doesn't get).

(Is there a precedent for a great performance not receiving an otherwise much-deserved Oscar based solely on the film the actor followed it up with, and finished, before any actual votes being cast?)

I'm sorry, I have to agree even more with Kate that this potentially-great-but-sadly-wasted 20th century comedian (my term)has no coherent desire to "be saved from himself," as she so beautifully put it.
But still, I'm just a real sucker for comeback stories.

Posted by: Tony in SC at February 10, 2007 11:17 PM

I was delighted by the words "scrumpgasmic" and "magnerific," but the icing on the cake for me was the bit about Rasputin, the Romanovs, and Anastasia. BRILLIANT.

Posted by: bonnie at February 11, 2007 12:41 AM

I sincerely hope every voting member of the Academy sees this review and the movie before casting their vote for Eddie Murphy as Best Supporting Actor. There needs to be a rule that good performances are negated by really bad ones.
Great review...I will never be able to watch James Lipton again.

Posted by: memikeyounot at February 11, 2007 12:34 PM

Great review again, Dustine. I agree with earlier posts that I could hear James Lipton's voice. But then at some point it seemed to morph into Will Farrel's version of James Lipton, which was even better.
When I saw the previews for this movie, the character of Norbit reminded me vaguely of Bowfinger(if anyone can even remember that one), with Eddie Murphy playing Jiff. I actually kind of liked Bowfinger when I saw it, not that I anticipate seeing Norbit.

Posted by: zadzi at February 11, 2007 2:27 PM

"....because it is the narrative -- which unspools slowly and deliberately like a flower in the spring ..."

I knew at this point in the review Dustin was about to cut loose like a wolverine at a petting zoo.

He did not disappoint.

Posted by: Gracie at February 11, 2007 2:48 PM

I know they're just films, but geez! Between this guy, Tyler Perry and Martin Lawrence... And they all do such good business in the States. I know with M.L. there's been a bit of diminishing returns but profits are still being made.

You all know what I would say if I could be bothered, but at this point, I can't. The point it too tired to make, but still stands to reason.

Posted by: M at February 11, 2007 4:04 PM

Coming to America makes me bust up upon every single viewing, and I've prolly watched it several times a year since I was 8. How did Prince Akeem become such a douche?

Posted by: Amanda at February 11, 2007 5:00 PM

Thanks for reminding me, zadzi: Murphy's performances (both of them) in 'Bowfinger' were wonderfully restrained and outright hilarious in their own ways, I still love that movie.
Fortunately, I don't think he had too much creative control over Steve Martin's project, which probably saved Eddie's butt.

Posted by: Tony in SC at February 11, 2007 7:32 PM

Unbelievable. No words......

Posted by: Candy at February 11, 2007 8:56 PM

May I just say, that was but a masterful review that only one, Mr. Lipton, could match? Good show.

Posted by: Rachel at February 11, 2007 9:23 PM

A $33 million opening weekend for Norbit? Are you fucking kidding me?

I guess we are sliding towards that future Mike Judge displayed in Idiocracy, where one day someone will release a movie showing nothing more than a giant, naked ass farting at the camera for two hours, and people will flock to the theaters to see it.

Posted by: MrSparkle at February 11, 2007 9:51 PM

I work as a writing tutor at an American college. Recently, much to my chagrin, the language professors of the school took to using movies as the basis of their assignments.

Some of the essays the students have taken to me have given me nightmares. I'm just waiting for someone to come in with an essay panting over torture porn. Then, perhaps, my despair will be complete. I've already encountered students with essays panting and celebrating actual torture, so I figure this is inevitable. (Celebrating torture as a suitable response to my own minority group, even! I swear, there are twenty other tutors. How do these people fucking find me?) *twitch* I digress, however.

Your beautiful piece of well-defined sarcasm gives me a little bit of my hope for the world back. I'd print it out and give it to people, if I weren't deathly afraid that they'd think it was serious. And they would.

Oh, how they would.

Posted by: Anonymouse at February 11, 2007 10:02 PM

$33 million?? Are you kidding me? Generation Douchebag just got douchier.

Posted by: bonnie at February 12, 2007 12:28 AM

SURPRISED AT THE SUCCESS NORBIT HAS?? WELL YOU STUPID PEICES OF CLOSEMINDED SHYTS.EVERYONE DOES NOT THINK LIKE YOU.HALF OF YOU I SEEN POST ON OTHER SITES AND EVERY DAMN BLACK MOVIE YOU TEND TO TRASH IT AND GIVE IT A BAD REVIEW SEEMS YOUR NEVER F-ING HAPPY.NORBIT WAS HILARIOUS AS HELL AND IT HAS A GREAT MORAL TO IT AND ONLY A STUPID IDIOT WHO TAKES LIFE SO SERIOUS TO THE POINT HE OR SHE IS LIKELY BALDING OR WRINKLE IN THE EYES FROM STRESS WOULD CRITICIZE SUCH A MOVIE BASED ON ITS OUTRAGEOUS HUMOR WHICH YOUR TO LACKING IN HUMOR HAVING TO FIND FUNNY THE LEAST BIT.SHUT THE HELL UP AND GROW THE HELL UP.NO ONE IS LISTENING TO YOUR GARBAGE ASS CRITICISMS AND THE OBVIOUS IS IN THE MOVIE SELLS.THERE ARE PEOPLE OUT THERE THAT ACTUALLY LOVE THE BLUNT,OUTRAGEOUS HUMOR THAT COMES WITH EDDIE MURPHY THAT IS QUITE COMMON AMONG MANY AFRICAN AMERICANS WHICH HALF YOU SURBURBAN TRASH BASTARDS WHO PREFER GARBAGE FILMS SUCH AS MY,MYSELF AND IRENE OR THAT MOVIE WITH DREW BARRYMORE AND THE EUROPEAN ACTOR AS BEING A GREAT OSCAR DESERVING FUNNY FILM WHEN I SEEN IT AND IT WAS THE MOST BORING,DRYEST IN DRY HUMOR MOVIE IN THE WORLD.WERE ALL ENTITLED TO OPINIONS BUT ANYTIME YOU ASK ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME? AS A RESPONSE TO ITS HIGH BOX OFFICE SALES THEN PERHAPS THE PROBLEM ISNT THE FILM NORBIT.PERHAPS THE PROBLEM IS YOU AND THE WAY YOU VIEW A MOVIE AND HOW SERIOUS YOU TAKE SHIT AND YOUR CLOSEMIND AND FAILURE TO ACCEPT OTHERS OPINIONS AND HARP ON YOUR AS IF IT IS FACTUAL.GROW THE HELL UP!.GO SEE NORBIT.33 MILLION DOLLARS AND A NUMBER 1 BOX OFFICE HIT PROVE IT IS FUNNY AS HELL TO SOME DAMN BODY.

Posted by: you stupid slags at February 12, 2007 7:42 AM

And so speaketh the target audience.

I've never been much for the lowest common denominator approach myself.

Posted by: Wandring_Soul at February 12, 2007 8:21 AM

Dustin were you being sarcastic.
I'm torn. HELP!!!

Posted by: Jean at February 12, 2007 8:57 AM

"You Stupid Slags":

The caps lock key is the little one on the left of your keyboard between the tab and shift keys. You may want to press it again. If you are having trouble locating the space bar, please check under your thumbs, provided they aren't currently stuck up your ass.

---

Dustin:

In the words of a famous man: "You make Gandhi look like a child molester." Bravo, sir. I've been waiting for the Pajiba review of this ever since I saw the preview for it before Borat. You did not disappoint.

Posted by: tigi at February 12, 2007 9:40 AM

Eddie Murphey is pretty awesome. Regardless of his bad movies.

I just saw Coming to America for the millionth time the other day. Still one of my favorite movies.

Posted by: kayla at February 12, 2007 10:26 AM

I think our screaming ranter pretty much summed up everything the author of the review and the posters were trying to convey.

Generation D screams for recognition folks.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 12, 2007 10:44 AM

I'm going to start directing people I don't like to these sarcastic laden reviews in the hopes they won't pick up on it, and get excited to see these fil- uh, mov- well I guess I should just call them garbage and be done with it.

A categorically sublime review, though I'm sure I'll eventually end up watching this when they start showing it 50 times a week on TNT or TBS.

Posted by: Demos at February 12, 2007 10:48 AM

'you stupid slags': First off, why are you called people uneducated pieces of hot metal?

Second, you really have to work on your vitriol if you are going to go insulting people around here.

Third, what Drew Barrymore movie are you talking about? The only movie I could think of was Donnie Darko, and that wasn't a comedy, unless you are really f*cked up in the head.

Forth, Epic Movie was Number 1 movie as well. Actually, you probably liked that one too. Nevermind.

Fifth, I am African-American, and live smack in the middle of Southwest Atlanta, Georgia. It doesn't get much blacker than here. And I still think this is the biggest piece of excrement on the planet. And frankly, I find it insulting that you dare claim that most African-Americans enjoy this type of humor. How is a grown ass man dressing up as a crass, asinine, fat woman supposed to only be funny to a certain race or location (since you bring up the suburbanite angle)?

Lastly, just because you like this movie, doesn't mean you can't take a typing class at the Y or something. People tend to take your post less seriously if you sound like a fifth-grader. Also, if you are going to curse, then do it. Don't punk out and then misspell the edited word.

Amanda: Prince Akeem is such a douchebag now because he no longer has Semmi. I maintain that Eddie Murphy needs to stop ignoring Arsenio Hall's calls. All his troubles started when he stopped hanging out with Arsenio. Just saying.

M: You are not the only one. It is a sad fact that these three have establish the 'fat black woman' as a subgenre of comedy. It is sad that these guys don't think they are funny enough as themselves, and don't think actual FEMALES can handle the roles.

Posted by: Vermillion at February 12, 2007 10:54 AM

First...to SLAG...I have NO idea where you got the assumption that critics can tear this movie aprt and do so because Eddie Murphy is black. He was black when he made coming to america, and beverly hills cop, and did his stand-up, and was on SNL. He was black just a few months ago when dreamgirls came out. So what a coincidence?! He's still black now. His skin color has nothing to do with the fact that he makes shit movies in comparison to earlier comic brilliance. The other coincidence...Martin Lawrence and Eddie Griffin are in the same boat. They USED to be funny...and both happen to be black. Now...as you sit in your study hall at whatever-T-Smith Elementary (could be highschool though given the state of our schools these days) you will inveitably think I am saying 'It isn't a coincidence that all these actors happen to be black and all their movies happen to suck; ergo all us "shyts" don't like black actors." Not in the least. I think what you are seeing here is the decline of a once great comedian. Just like ML, just like Eddie Griffin. (If you tell me eating french fries out of a piss-soaked toilet is funny then I swear to god i hope you get anally raped by a bengal tiger with aids.) These comedians are now phongin it in...through poor management. Like Adam Sandler. Like Steve Martin. Like Robin Williams. They all used to be funny. They all now give most people wioth more than 2 brain cells a twitch in their left eyes. That is my peaceful explanation and I hopw you can learn to respect the opinions of others, and that they can, and likely will differ from yours many times throughout your life. That's what you should be learning your freshman year in highschool. Calm down. Take your ritalin. make sure you pay attention from now on in keyboarding, english, psychology...this will seriously help your ability to respond to a post on a website. Again..this is my peaceful reply to an obviously angry young person. but my normal reply???

THIS MOVIE IS BEING CALLED SHIT BECAUSE IT IS SHIT! DEAL WITH IT AND DON'T MISS YOUR BUS.

Posted by: PissBoy at February 12, 2007 10:54 AM

SLAG...Another thought just came to mind so I'll attempt to be as reasonable as possible and refer to you as the person you truly are:

Eddie. I can understand your frustration. Yet another opening weekend at the top of the box office, and yet another opening weekend with more people laughing you out of the room than are laughing at your films. This would drive anyone up a wall. I know what you're going through. We all see it. We know your pain. We think about it all the time as I'm sure you do. "How can it be that I'm at the top of the box office, one of the most lucrative per-film actors of the last 25 years, and yet, I have no sense of self-respect. Am I making these movies only for the money? Do I not love my craft enough to actually read past the title page of the script? Why do i have such an insatiable habit for hookers that look like Don Cheadle?" That last question is mine, but if you don't mind...answer it in your reply. I wish I had the answer to these and the hundreds of others we all know you have. Your solution lies in 2 places. 1. Never do another movie where you play more than 1 role ever again. It was funny in Coming to America (originating on SNL). Focus on 1 set of line for 1 character. At least then, if the movie is routine, you have a CHANCE, albeit an outside one, to shine above the material. 2. Call Arsenio. He's in your 5 I'm sure. Remember...everyone in your 5 is free anytime. No matter what the network. Call him. I'm pretty sure he's not doing much. He'll take your call. You guys can go catch one of your movies together...just make sure you keep sharp objects out of his reach until the pain subsides, post credit roll.

Posted by: PissBoy at February 12, 2007 11:09 AM

I tried to read this review, but I have too much WRINKLE IN THE EYES FROM STRESS.

Seriously, people, wrinkled corneas are no joke. To avoid wrinkled corneas, watch your stress levels, drink seven glasses of water a day, and avoid watching any films featuring men in fat suits pretending to be obnoxious women.

Talk to your doctor if you suspect you have WRINKLE IN THE EYES FROM STRESS.

Posted by: Wednesday at February 12, 2007 11:15 AM

Wednesday and Vermillion, your comments seriously rival Dustin's wit!

I'm sitting in front of my computer laughing by myself like an idiot, at the review AND the many brilliant comments. Not to mention the unintentionally funny ones...

As far as I know I don't suffer from WITEFS, but I sure am addicted to Pajiba!

Posted by: mt at February 12, 2007 11:45 AM

Wednesday and Pissboy- I'd say that your comments were my favorites, but I am too bitter from my BALDING and WITEFS to be a reliable source. As a female, the balding is particularly stressful, which really only exacerbates the wrinkling. What to do, what to do?

Yes- Bowfinger was terrifically funny. It is clear to me know that this was due to Steve Martin's brilliance. Eddie- I weep for you.

Posted by: Go Big Red at February 12, 2007 12:38 PM

I feel sorry for Eddie Murphy. He used to be so funny. I think the last movie that he was in that I enjoyed was Bowfinger.

"You're doin' great! You're gonna be a big star!"

Posted by: rebel mama at February 12, 2007 12:42 PM

I guess your pie didn't work.

Posted by: alexis at February 12, 2007 1:15 PM

I think you guys are being a little hard on you stupid slags. Can't you see....he's just worried about us. The yelling isn't angry yelling -- it's more like when your mom would yell because she just loved you so darn much and didn't want to see you throw your life away. Right? I mean, yss is deeply worried that our lack of humor having will ruin our lives. He doesn't want us to get WITEFS or balding. Because he cares. And sure, he cares so very much that he yells. And he forgets that pesky second "o" in 'too,' and can't take the time to put in an apostrophe in 'you're' - but who can blame him, really, when so much is on the line? Lack of humor having is serious, people.

Posted by: puckerby at February 12, 2007 3:27 PM

The yelling isn't angry yelling -- it's more like when your mom would yell because she just loved you so darn much and didn't want to see you throw your life away.

Tyra? Is that you?

Posted by: claire at February 12, 2007 3:54 PM

Caps Lock is cruise control for cool.

Posted by: Me at February 12, 2007 4:39 PM

Vermillion: Thanks for the support. I know living in Canada, people often think my sensibilities have been white-washed (I'm black). Nice to be reminded by others sometimes that 'black', and 'humour', and 'intelligence' aren't mutually exclusive. Anybody with a brain stem and a hammer can see that this isn't attempting to be Lawrence of Arabia, but if you don't do what you're doing well, then you're just sitting around with your dicks in your hands with nothing to show for your efforts but...millions and millions of dollars.

Time to add to my student debt.
Such a fun thread, guys.

Posted by: M at February 12, 2007 4:52 PM

Of course only the nominated performance should be considered in a perfectly objective vacuum, but the Oscars are far from a vacuum. Performers are rewarded for their bodies of work all the time, and - given how subjective much of this crap is - I don't think that's entirely unreasonable. Some years are stronger than others, and sometimes great performances get passed over. Maybe Al should have won for Godfather Part 2 instead of Scent of a Woman, maybe Denzel should have won for Malcolm X instead of Training Day, and maybe Russell should have won for The Insider instead of Gladiator. Certainly all Oscar-winners have their acting "skeletons" (although I think the Philip Seymour Hoffman Twister performance was the only fun thing about that movie), but does that mean it's out of line to let those seep into the judgment of the voters? I simply don't think it is. I'm not going to slight Eddie because he wants to get the dollars from the masses. Do I think less of him artistically? Yes. But the bottom line is that it's the fault of the audiences for going to see Norbit in droves. Don't you think if movies like Dreamgirls could consistently open at $30 million that Eddie would be taking more of those roles?

Posted by: Rob at February 12, 2007 4:58 PM

Yes, Y.S.S. (you stupid slags), I am a stupid slag, because I trash this movie because I hate black people. BRILLIANT reasoning.

I just don't know where to start. I guess we'll go with this: I AM getting WITEFS because all-caps hurt my eyes. And being called a closeminded shyt makes perfect sense, because I HATE seeing movies in which a once-talented comedian dress up in a fat suit for gags and farts. Damn, I am so judgmental. I am glad for your long, postmodern post. It reminds me why I belong to this site. Generation D is still going strong!

BTW, which Drew Barrymore/European guy movie are we talking about? Was Drew nominated for an Oscar???

Posted by: bonnie at February 12, 2007 5:13 PM

uggghh. *dresses up* Guess I got carried away and forgot to make sure my grammar was correct.

Posted by: bonnie at February 12, 2007 5:18 PM

Dustin,

Genius, pure f***in' genius.

I've said this before in my comments:
Thank you. Better you than me

Was the title of this essay to splendiferousness of Eddie's performance changed once it earned what it so rightly deserved this weekend? What was the original title?

Author's Note: Thanks, Brian. And the original title was a nod to Spinal Tap: The Looser the Waistband / The Deeper the Quicksand

Posted by: Brian at February 12, 2007 5:22 PM

Dear You Stupid Slags:
I'm sorry. I don't speak uneducated-angry-black- moron. Can you please type that again in English. Thanks.

Posted by: Drea at February 12, 2007 5:24 PM

Dear You Stupid Slags,

It's me, Whitey. I got your message. You nailed me. I read your comment and I am filled with remorse (that means I feel like shyt). I think you are absolutely right, the problem IS me and the way I view a movie. No longer will I go to a movie sober OR conscious.

Posted by: Whitey at February 12, 2007 5:56 PM

Did anyone else suspect that maaaaybe that "Slags" person was just someone pretending to be an idiot to make everyone else feel more validated in our snobbery, to give us all a tangible enemy to fight against and strengthen our collected point that movies like this suck? Honestly, I bet it was Dustin or something. And on that note, I agree it was a great review, but let's move on and stop orgasming all over it.

Posted by: B at February 12, 2007 6:01 PM

But orgasms take the wrinkles away.

Posted by: Vi at February 12, 2007 6:38 PM

I heard MadTV's Will Sasso's impression of James Lipton in my head as I read this. lol.

I'm James ... LIPTON!

Posted by: duckandcover at February 12, 2007 7:41 PM

BWAH! I almost spewed onto my computer screen. If it was Dustin, it was brilliant. B, I don't think I can move on. The review is great, but the comments just make it even funnier.

And, I actually saw the entire trailer for the movie. [shudders.] $33 million for that????

Posted by: bonnie at February 12, 2007 8:09 PM

Oh, wow. Pissboy, you rule. I wish I had thought of that "he's in your 5" line. Damn.

And I would never thought that he could be Eddie. Maybe Sick of the B.S.'s little brother (see NMN's Michaal Richards article comments), but not Eddie. Although, it could be Marlon Wayans as well. This is one of the few times he had stepped out of the Wayans 'hot zone', and he may be feeling a little lonely and unsure of himself.

Still, nobody knows what movie Drew Barrymore got an Oscar nod for?

Posted by: Vermillion at February 12, 2007 8:32 PM

I don't think Y.S.S. was saying Drew Barrymore had been nominated for an Oscar, I think he was saying that we Pajibans think she deserves one (as opposed to thinking Eddie Murphy deserves a nom? I'm guessing here). I would venture a guess that Y.S.S. was talking about "Music and Lyrics," perhaps? I'm basing this on his description of it as "that movie with Drew Barrymore and the European Actor" (Hugh Grant?) Though obviously he hasn't been around here long if he expects the review for "Music and Lyrics" to be positive....

Of course, I could be wrong, given that I'm trying to interpret HALF YOU SURBURBAN TRASH BASTARDS WHO PREFER GARBAGE FILMS SUCH AS MY,MYSELF AND IRENE OR THAT MOVIE WITH DREW BARRYMORE AND THE EUROPEAN ACTOR AS BEING A GREAT OSCAR DESERVING FUNNY FILM WHEN I SEEN IT AND IT WAS THE MOST BORING,DRYEST IN DRY HUMOR MOVIE IN THE WORLD.

Though if "Music and Lyrics" IS the ... dryest in dry humor movie in the world, sign me up.

Ooooh - or maybe Y.S.S. thinks Drew Barrymore was in "Venus"?!?

Posted by: Edith at February 12, 2007 9:49 PM

I believe yss was referring to the new movie with Drew B and Hugh Grant (aka "that European guy"): "Music and Lyrics." He wrote "Oscar-deserving", not "-winning", and, from what I can tell of the context, probably meant it sarcastically (aka The ast refuge of the...).

I know--it was probably hard to spot that outstanding slight of rhetorical craft amid all the...whatever it was.

Posted by: ranylt at February 12, 2007 9:56 PM

...And apparently it's contagious, because that would of course be "sleight", not "slight".

Posted by: ranylt at February 12, 2007 9:58 PM

Dammit, Edith...

Posted by: ranylt at February 12, 2007 9:58 PM

you are all my people. Let's make out. You too, y.s.s., clearly you are a misunderstood genius.

Posted by: Theresa at February 13, 2007 12:33 AM

No, no, I think YSS is thinking of that movie with Jude Law and Kate Winslet. I, too, frequently get Drew Barrymore and Kate Winslet mixed up - it's all that WITEFS.

Posted by: elsworthy at February 13, 2007 7:16 AM

Heh. I actually first thought of that movie, and then I thought, "I must be balding from my lack of humor having - that's Cameron Diaz, not Drew Barrymore!" Who I apparently confused because of "Charlie's Angels," and because I haven't actually seen "Holiday," or whatever that one was called.

So - we have no idea what movie Y.S.S. was talking about, because Drew Barrymore is interchangeable with too many actresses in too many lame rom-coms, and because there are entirely too many EUROPEAN ACTORs. So come back, Y.S.S., and clarify. We'd love to hear more!

Posted by: Edith at February 13, 2007 9:02 AM

I know we're all having fun here at Y.S.S. 's remarks, but seriously....doesn't anyone remember the WITEFS pandemic of 1915? I checked with my HMO and I'm not even covered for the vaccine. They had the nerve to pretend they don't know what I'm talking about....can we say "Conspiracy"? Obviously, the government doesn't want a panic on their hands. That's why we haven't heard from Y.S.S. since the last post....SOMEONE GOT TO HIM! Everyone is at risk people....not just the surburban trash bastards and the bald among us who enjoyed My,Myself And Irene.

And in defense of Y.S.S.'s Drew Barrymore confusion, I also confuse her with Jodie Foster and think he's referring to Silence of The Lambs, which I didn't think was very funny either.

Posted by: Kate at February 13, 2007 12:22 PM

I thought the Oscars were to award the individual performance, not an actor's entire body of work.

My bad.

Can you call (insert Academy Award winning actor who's ever made a back movie here) and tell them to send their Oscars back?

Posted by: ciji at February 13, 2007 12:39 PM

Opps: typo.. back=bad

Posted by: ciji at February 13, 2007 12:40 PM

I couldn't resist...I had to come back. Does anyone else think Y.S.S. sounds like a screaming version (syntax alike!) in the 'All Your Base Are Belong to Us...' video?

Now...on to whomever drew the parallel between Eddie's body of work and that of Philip Seymour Hoffman and pulled 'Twister' out of his/her ass.
Are you f'ing stupid???

Let's look at this from a couple angles; first being collective bodies of work (insofar as being an ACTOR...not the movie as a whole). I challenge anyone to name me 6 roles PSH has played poorly? Even in crap movies like Along Came Polly, he (as I suggested Eddie can do) rose above the material he was given and made his role funnier than most people coould have made it. There's a believability to his performances that are the purest definition of ACTOR. He manages to to draw you into every performance with this honesty in his overall approach. I've believed he was the guy in every role I've seen him in. Now...Eddie. I challenge anyone to find me 6 roles where he manages to do what PSH does. He has a longer resume and it's pretty hard to come up with them. Not to mention...the bodies of work he's chosen have also sucked shit through a solid gold tube. Eddie Murphy is the black Hugh Grant. In all of his movies, especially the last decade or so, he plays nothing more than a variation of his most recent character. Ryan Reynolds was quickly falling into this crowd as well, but if he can continue to make the turn he started making in Smokin' Aces he's avoid it swimmingly. Only once in a while has Eddie managed to fall into that part that brings out the talent he has...and I'm sorry. Hate me if I feel like he should be the farthest person from the podium on Oscar night. He'll likely get it though because of the money he brings in for Hollywood. Eddie Murphy is Halle Berry. Jamie Foxx is Halle Berry. Consitantly going 0-fer-whatever as far as working choices go while others can hit it out of the park 7 out of 10 times. Philip Seymour Hoffman deserved his Oscar. Eddie Murphy doesn't even deserve a nod. It's like comparing Apples to dogshit.

And one last thing sprang to mind...cuz I have to take my lunch break at work....Eddie always plays Eddie...just like Hugh Grant always plays Hugh Grant...Is it odd that they both have a serious predilection to Don Cheadle-esque hookers in bad wigs??? Maybe the could just get a younger looking outfit for Tyler Perry and everyone would be happy.

Posted by: PissBoy at February 13, 2007 1:14 PM

And before anyone else gets to it...yes...my lunchbreak ALWAYS makes me think of masculine hookers and the men who love them.

Posted by: PissBoy at February 13, 2007 1:15 PM

Sarcasm noted, but I'm not saying that the Oscars should reward bodies of work as opposed to the individual performances. I'm just saying that they do, and I think it's a necessary and understandable evil. The Oscars are a nice honor and fun to discuss, but I don't take them seriously enough to get that fired up over them. Film appreciation is far from an exact science.

Posted by: Rob at February 13, 2007 5:09 PM

Oh, and by the way, I echo the praise, Dustin. This review rocks.

Posted by: Rob at February 13, 2007 5:10 PM

Not jumping on you Rob...There was someone else who drew the PSH comparison...your mention of him in Twister echo's my sentiment that at least he plays all of his characters well...and yes the oscars are nothing to get fired up about.

And as far as film appreciation...that's why I come HERE. Because I won't have to see 'Steve Matin and Eugene Levy kicking each other in the balls...Fantastic! When is Cheaper by the Dozen 11-teen coming out?' I think that's why we all come here. Every single person on this board can sniff a turd in a rosebush with the greatest of ease...then YSS the turd burglar comes in and provides the BEST unintentional comedy one can imagine. I don't see a downside anywhere...other than WITEFS. (

Posted by: PissBoy at February 13, 2007 5:21 PM

"Author's Note: Thanks, Brian. And the original title was a nod to Spinal Tap: The Looser the Waistband / The Deeper the Quicksand"

Wow - my comment was read and responded to - I feel honored. Meant to come back to come back earlier to check

Whoohoo - Mudflaps, not nearly enough mudflaps references on the web. I knew something was missing

Posted by: Brian at February 13, 2007 9:02 PM

I think that they'll work some of the rough spots out of the concept for the second and third installments.

Posted by: tom at February 14, 2007 12:01 AM

It says something that I find the image posted in association with this movie infinitely more terrifying and nightmare inducing than the one on the "Hannibal Rising" entry.

Oh dear.

Posted by: Nick at February 14, 2007 2:00 AM

Y.S.S, come on. We know it's you, you don't have to hide from us, your former fans.

Really, people here just want to see a return to form. Don't take it so personally. Dreamgirls was ok. Not great, but ok. So, hey, lets try not to be so angry ok?
We won't bring up Pluto Nash anymore if it makes you so mad, but I and the other concerned posters here really think you should stop wearing fat suits because, hey, it's been done. So Ed... I mean You Stupid Slags, let's just calm down a little and try to work things out. Deal?

Posted by: lex at February 14, 2007 11:25 PM

Somewhere out there Jonathan Swift is smiling.

Posted by: Mr.West at February 15, 2007 10:59 PM

I had a satirgasm.

I must, in fact, compliment you with another made-up word: stuponfucious. It means the, uh, state of, um, being awesome.

Posted by: Shadowen at February 17, 2007 1:32 AM

I am SO GLAD I stopped by today!

"satirgasm"


A half hour well spent!

Posted by: momly at February 17, 2007 3:08 PM

That was breathtaking!

Posted by: Jo-Anne at February 23, 2007 4:44 PM

Oh man. I realize I'm late to the party, but I need to say that yesterday, due to unusual social circumstances, I was forced under threat of loss of income to watch this movie. It was an experience of pure pain.

Posted by: van at February 26, 2007 11:37 PM

Hold up!!! Now i jus read almost everybody's little outragious,stupid,funny,and angry comments about the movie "Norbit". How old are we people? 17,18,19,20 somewhere around there? C'mon let's be real. Almost every movie Eddie Murphy has been in has been hilarious. I can name a few. "Trading Places", "Beverly Hills Cop", "Harlem Nights", "Nutty Professor", "Holy Man", (wasn't good, but it was funny) "LIFE", "I Spy", & "Daddy Day Care".
Now maybe i'm being to nice but MOST of his movies are good. Whether they are kid movies like "Shrek", or even "Mulan". I watch all types of movies and after seeing the comments about "Norbit" I got a little pissed off. Some of you are jus taking this a little to serious. The movie was funny and had a good story. SIMPLE AS THAT. If you think about it that's all you want in a comedy movie right? Correct me if i'm wrong. I don't see what the whole fuss is about. The damn movie was funny. VERY FUNNY. Probably one of my favorite comedy's. So all the buckerin about how the movie was dumb and all that bullshit. It can jus stop. If any body has something to say holla at me

Posted by: Duke at February 27, 2007 8:49 AM

Okay, Duke, consider me baited. As a woman, I don't find it amusing when a man dresses up in a fatsuit. Maybe I have no sense of humor. I just find the idea of laughing at an obese woman repulsive. I would like to point out, Norbit is not the first (in Love Actually, they made plump/fat jokes against the Natalie character that really pissed me off), nor will it be the last.Fat jokes are tasteless. Period.

Next, I have nothing against Eddie Murphy (except for his Scary Spice baby daddy issue, but that's personal and will never ruin my enjoyment of Shrek). I think you are the only person to mention Trading Places, one of my favorites of his ("It was the Dukes!" always cracks me up). Eddie makes good movies, but he also makes bad ones. This, my friend, is no Trading Places.

I also think that many of us are just disgusted by the idea of Eddie Murphy getting in a fatsuit AND playing a cognitively challenged character. It's insulting actually. Insulting to people who have weight problems or cognitive challenges, insulting to movie viewers to think that we'll plunk our money down to make fun of those marginialized by society, and insulting to Murphy himself. He should know better.

Posted by: bonnie at February 28, 2007 4:00 PM

Great article, great comments one and all.

Keep up the good work!

Posted by: Eddie at March 1, 2007 2:52 PM

No, Duke, "most" of Eddie Murphy's films aren't funny, but a large enough percentage of his body of work is, enough so that we know that he is capable of much better.

Maybe - just maybe - if he wouldn't continually slap his audience upside their (our) collective heads with his oversized "any-job-that-pays" attitude, he would have had a real shot at that Oscar.

I want Eddie Murphy to do good, funny movies. I want the same from Bill Murray, Steve Martin, Robin Williams, and several others who we all know have it in them, but whom also continually choose work based solely on the paycheck.

Posted by: Xopher tm at March 1, 2007 5:18 PM

I thought Norbit was hilarious. Maybe this outrageous style of humor isn't for the majority of you guys here but I don't think just because it's not your type of humor you should denounce it as a crappy meritless movie. Eddie really did a good job in the facial expressions and physical movements of his characters. The body suits and makeup looked authentic.

I also don't think Eddie Murphy was making fun of fat people. Rasputia was funny mainly because of her obnoxious personality.

Posted by: Lotusgirl at August 3, 2007 2:44 AM