museum.jpg

Bah Humbug

Night at the Museum / Phillip Stephens

Film Reviews | December 28, 2006 | Comments (64)


It occurred to me during my viewing of Night at the Museum that the films that are hardest to review are those that clearly aren’t aimed for my personal tastes or demographic. It should be obvious to any of Pajiba’s readers that, given half a chance, neither I nor the other critics who write here would deign to sit through a movie that promises only to be a holiday time-killer, a quasi-comedy-adventure with ludicrous, amusing visuals and tepid, kid-friendly comedy. And that’s exactly what Night at the Museum is: a flimsy pretext to throw a bunch of random shit together to (ideally) distract youngsters and not offend the parents or grandparents who’ve taken them to the movies on Christmas weekend.

So it’s precarious to come out of such a viewing with pretentious derogations when the film in question exists as a means to raw entertainment and not for any inherent purpose. But I can tell you that, as far as kids’ entertainment goes, I’ve seen better. The bland octogenarians-and-under-10 demographic should get what they pay for, but anyone else will probably react to the movie with the same boredom and apathy that I felt. Not even the cabal of supposedly great comedians who appear in Night at the Museum can save this paltry blueprint, which has served the family-comedy genre since the John Hughes/Chris Columbus (who produced here) era.

Larry Daley (Ben Stiller) is the archetypal moron with a chip on his shoulder. Larry has vocational difficulties (can’t hold a job), which wouldn’t be a huge deal except that his ruthlessly judgmental ex-wife and son make it clear that if he doesn’t land a steady paycheck they’ll … continue to nag and judge him until he does. Larry lands a job as a night watchman at the Museum of Natural History, where, as the previews promise, all the crap comes to life and wreaks havoc. I forget exactly why or how — it’s either Satan or some Egyptian curse.

What’s particularly sad is the unintentional museum metaphor that comes to play here, as the supporting cast is stacked with relics of comedy (Mickey Rooney, Dick Van Dyke, Robin Williams) and the underused newcomers (Ricky Gervais, Paul Rudd, Owen Wilson, Charlie Murphy). The purpose of the former is clearly to appeal to the older folks’ comedy tastes, but the latter few are more known for their adult or hipster appeal. In any case, neither old nor young have much to work with, as the CG animals and costumed buffoons are intended to create asinine situations for comedy to ensue without the comedians doing any of it themselves. The resulting blandness will be boring to all but the most insipid of holiday theatergoers.

Night at the Museum is a decades-old pretense and a cheap ploy to suck some green out of our Christmas leisure time. If you ask me, families would be better served dusting off their VHS copies of Home Alone and staying inside this year. Then again, if you’re old enough or young enough to ignore the spiteful grumblings of a jaded critic, well, Merry Christmas.

Phillip Stephens is the lead critic for Pajiba. He lives in Fayetteville, AR.









Good Shepherd, The | The Sorcerer's Pajiba!













Comments

What a shame. I had hoped this might be an old-school farcical romp. Something along the lines of It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World. Alas, I guess I'll just have to go on being annoyed by Ben Stiller.

Posted by: jbrader at December 22, 2006 6:01 PM

Well, you said it in your opening paragraph - the movies hardest to review are those not meant for your demographic. I wish you'd had a parent cover this movie so we could have a real review.

Posted by: Patti at December 22, 2006 6:13 PM

Dear Patti:
Are you 12? A real review of what? There's nothing here to see, I don't care who you are, parent, child, or family pet. There's no silk. There's no substance. Hell, on The Daily Show, Jon Stewart barely had anything to ask him about the actual film. The interview was more like, "So, the real museum is pretty cool, huh?" Even when Ricky Gervais was on the same show a few days earlier, they spoke about Ricky pissing into the kitchen sink of his first apartment, rather than even mention the film. That should scream volumes about its quality. Patti, this movie really sucks. Just skip it, save your money and rent "It's a Wonderful Life" instead.

Posted by: kotter71 at December 22, 2006 7:13 PM

Darn. I was actually hoping for more from Ben INeverTurnDownARole Stiller. I guess we'll be skipping this one.

Posted by: The Necklace Lady at December 22, 2006 7:49 PM

Jesus Kotter, calm the fuck down. It's still a movie and it's got actors and maybe, MAYBE a story. If it doesn't why don't you watch the bloody flick befor you make you're retarded comments against people who have something relevant to say.

On a completely unrelated note and as I am beeing slightly hipocritical, I agree with Patti because I can so get your act together Phill, give us the bitchy, not some half-assed excuse why not.

Posted by: NigelLND at December 22, 2006 8:21 PM

I'm not even sure what Nigel wrote was English.

Anywho... The premise sounds like it could be kinda cool. I mean what kid hasn't wondered what their toys do when he/she isn't around? Or what a dog does when the human is there? I was hoping for a live action Toy Story kind of movie here.

The problem with "kids movies" is that it's just too easy for them to be made like shit and toss aside all the potential for a good story because the studio knows that parents are going to be at their wit's end by Friday and longing for the kiddos to be back in front of a teacher.

Good kids movies... and there are a few, slip in some humor for the adults. Pixar does it. Home Alone (only the first one) Hell pick up a muppet movie you haven't seen since you were six and you will notice all kinds of jokes that you didn't get back then.

This is just another piece of garbage that no one will remember come July.

Posted by: Lizzie at December 22, 2006 9:01 PM

I meant what the dog does when the human isn't there. I hate this new keyboard!

Posted by: Lizzie at December 22, 2006 9:02 PM

Man, Tony Wonder sucks the life outta Hannukah cookies... or something to that effect.

Is it just me, or is there a spell-check on this shit... Way to make me even more insecure about my spelling of that, er.. Jewish holiday.

Posted by: Sandy at December 23, 2006 8:03 AM

Ben Stiller has reached into the realm of the unforgivable. He used to clever, funny, even somewhat smart in his choices. But now he's becoming a parody. In fact, he's only a couple shitty choices away from becoming *this* generation's Robin Williams. He'll use the same "frantic, nervous guy" schtick... over... and over... and the next thing you know he's wearing a doctor's coat and a fucking clown nose.

And Patti - that WAS a real review. By someone from Pajiba. I don't think it was the wrong reviewer - I think you might be at the wrong website. Try this: http://www.familystyle.com/ That wasn't meant to be a rip, by the way, but let's be real about it... "scathing reviews for bitchy people". I'm not being bitchy to you, though I will be to Nigel - Holy fuck man, get your spell check on. And maybe pick up a copy of Strunk & White. And... settle down.

Posted by: TK at December 23, 2006 9:37 AM

I generally do like the reviews here - but Phillip announced his difficulty with this type of movie at the outset, and I don't think his review was helpful. It was a little like reading a Roger Ebert review of a David Lynch film - Ebert doesn't get Lynch, and shouldn't review him.

Heh, I really pushed Kotter's button, huh.

Posted by: Patti at December 23, 2006 1:49 PM

Well, I'm glad I didn't read this before I left, because man is it off base. I'm gonna whip out the classic line here, everyone get ready.

"What the fuck were you expecting, Casablanca?!"

After you admit to having naught but disdain for this genre, saying that it basically means you shouldn't be commenting because you dislike the genre, you then proceed to make a load of value judgements based on other movies from a genre you don't like? Weak, sir. Weak.

Do I expect scathing anger at Pajiba? Oh yes. It's why I come here. However, getting a pre-conceived, flat, generic rag on "holiday fun" movies, just because they appeal to kids? Because they don't pretend toward some deeper philosophy or meta-level of experience? Because they don't attempt some sort of academic or emotional mind-fuck? That's weak and cheap. Low-hanging fruit much? Christ. If it's true that all of you at Pajiba would rather watch anything but this sort of movie, get a new reviewer that enjoys a throwaway flick. Complex solution, I know.

My review? This movie was fun. I found myself chuckling pretty regularly, I found the "tired old comedians" relatively entertaining, if a bit over-the-top cheeky, and the other "hipster genre" comics, as you call them, were clearly not there to push the "hipster" envelope or even appeal to their demo. My guess is Ben Stiller went to guys like Owen Wilson and Charlie Murphy and said "Hey, I'm doing this little distraction flick about a museum that comes to life. Casablanca it ain't. Wanna pick up a bit part and have a little fun?" Was this movie overflowing with substance? Shit no. Was it overflowing with compelling plot points and extensive character development? Shit no. Was it a good time? Yeap. A fine time at the movies. Not bad, not great, just plain acceptable. Frankly with all the tripe I pay $10 to see, expecting a non-pretentious throwaway flick and getting exactly that was pretty pleasant. The story was a little forced, some twists could've stayed straight to no detriment, some points could've been better explained, some actors could've been better utilized, but in the end, I watched a miniature Owen Wilson and Steve Coogan drive a radio controlled H3 through a park dragging a fetch bone so the tyrannosaurus rex (Rexy. Can you beat that?) skeleton would follow them, and I was pretty satisfied with that. Come on! Where's your child-like wonder and merriment?

I'm nobody's parent, hell I don't even understand kids, but this movie was still a good time. I expect kids will eat it up, and I expect parents will be more entertained than they are watching Pokemon or Bob the fucking Builder. Frankly, if you have any of your inner child left, you'll probably be amused at least, likely entertained. If you liked Jumanji, you'll probably get along with this just fine. It's not quite that caliber, but it's a sibling.

Posted by: Adam Michel at December 23, 2006 2:41 PM

I'm nobody's parent

Please keep it that way. No one deserves your easily amused, lowest common denominator idiot genes.

Posted by: Ike at December 23, 2006 5:25 PM

Wow, the holidays sure bring out the best in everyone. Usually it's just the review that's bitchy, not just the talkbackers.

Posted by: I Am Never Wrong at December 23, 2006 5:39 PM

Wow, Ike. Chillax. I guess we're just not as smart as you. You win.

Posted by: Common Denominator Idiot Gene Carrier #2 at December 23, 2006 7:10 PM

Damn Ike, just rip him another one why don't ya? Oh well, it's what he gets i suppose.

Posted by: Rob at December 23, 2006 7:22 PM

Are these reactions to a movie review or have I stumbled on exised portions of George Saunders "The Optimist" piece last week in New Yorker ?

Weird seeing Robin Williams' name among the "relics of comedy". Sure he was godawful on the Comic Relief show this year, but relic?

Btw, since Mickey Rooney has never been funny or otherwise talented in his entire excuse for a career his inclusion makes zippo sense.

Didn't even know that Dick Van Dyke was still alive.

Oh, and I also hate Owen Wilson. Luke is way cuter and was also in a classic X-Files episode where he makes Mulder jealous.

Posted by: Matt at December 23, 2006 9:19 PM

I was starting to think I was the only woman in the world who hates Owen Wilson. Because I certainly do hate him.... I hate his voice, I hate his face, I hate his hair.... I just HATE. I hate Jennifer Lopez more, but Owen's high up there on the Hate Scale.

But I would go see a movie where bad things happen to him. I like that movie Enough because that filty, pompous trollop Jennifer Lopez gets the shit kicked out of her. Does Owen Wilson get a beat-down from anyone? Because that would be a big, fat, Merry Xmas to ME!

Posted by: Hattie at December 23, 2006 11:48 PM

hey matt, we could give a shit who you think is cuter. I have a feeling your ( no parent) also.. saved ya some typing there IKE

Posted by: pasadenamike at December 23, 2006 11:55 PM

Please keep it that way. No one deserves your easily amused, lowest common denominator idiot genes.

Oh, I think you deserve them. In fact...
Ike, I am your father.

Seriously, taste in movies is now criteria for procreation privilege? Is this pretty much your day, wallowing in a pool of self-importance pontificating in your fantasy world that dissension from your rubric of taste constitutes a violation of social order punishable by breeding restriction? Why don't we focus on the film and less on personal attacks, or is your argument against this film so weak that the only viable tactic was an attempt at character debasement?

Posted by: Adam Michel at December 24, 2006 3:16 AM

I love how Adam\'s rambling riposte was so carefully constructed, clearly indicating a desperation to prove an intelligence of which Ike so mordantly posited there was none.

Posted by: Parul at December 24, 2006 2:44 PM

A. I love the word "rubric".

B. This movie was crap, but preferable to seeing Eragon with my 11 year old niece, and I was mildly entertained by a T. Rex wagging its tail.

C. I remember a time when Pajiba comments were something other than flame wars between people who think being a dick is cool and people who think trashing anything just because it exists is how to be a cool dick. The comments used to be amusing. Now they're lame attempts to assert some douchebag's idea of a smart aside. It's painful really. Merry Christmas.

Posted by: Kitty X at December 24, 2006 6:47 PM

did you ever notice that lately, every single person on the internet is just having so much fun acting like an asshole? like it's so super cool to act like a prick to someone you don't even know? treating other people like shit and loving it because you're anonymous and can get away with it?

i'm not exempt from this either. but what the fuck is wrong with all of us? seriously?

happy christmas, everyone. wait a minute. sorry--kitty x beat me to it--i didn't have the stomach to read the comments all the way down.

anyhow, i had to say it too.

Posted by: livvie at December 24, 2006 7:36 PM

Comment battles (and flaming in general) are fun. Being snarky doesn't rise to the level of "treating people like shit." Sticks and stones, ya know?

I agree with Ike. There are a slew of good movies in theatres right now and Adam decides to set fire to his 10 spot instead of checking one out? He should be castrated!

Posted by: sif at December 25, 2006 12:29 AM

"I'm nobody's parent."

And with an attitude like that, hopefully you never will be. There are enough joyless parents in the world.

Posted by: Sam at December 25, 2006 12:55 AM

Oh Ben Stiller *sigh*

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 25, 2006 10:01 AM

Good Lord people, merry fucking Christmas!

Despite the awful review I'm still going to see this movie. One of the best inventions is the public library that carries popular DVDs. I can check it out with my library card for free. Then if I hate it, I haven't wasted money on it. Or if I like it, then I've supported my local library and saved my money for a better film. Just like I did with V For Travesty...whoops, I mean Vendetta.

Calm down people. Oi to the world.

Posted by: stardust savant at December 25, 2006 12:48 PM

Why was it a travesty?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 25, 2006 12:55 PM

actually this:

No one deserves your easily amused, lowest common denominator idiot genes.

isn't funny. it's said to hurt people--and i know, because to my shame i've done the exact same thing--and to show other people what a TOTAL CLASS-A WINNER you are at the intarwebz.

if anyone thinks that saying shit like that from behind the safety of their keyboard is somehow stimulating, fun, a lark or just all about the zany kooky laffs, they're sorely mistaken.

all it does is make you sound intolerant and ugly.

the older i get, the less patience i have for it. just fucking relax and give each other a fucking break, FFS. /steps off soapbox

Posted by: livvie at December 25, 2006 1:14 PM

If I were straight, I would totally want to marry Livvie and Kitty X, but I'll settle for being their GBFF.

Posted by: Craig at December 25, 2006 1:40 PM

The husband, the child and I were considering seeing this, but I think we'll pass. We watched It's a Wonderful Life last night for the first time in several years (first time for our daughter to ever see it--she's 12) and we were reminded what a great piece of story-telling it was. It kinda ruined us for the cheap knock-off shit passing as movies nowdays, so we'll not be heading out to the gigamultiplex today.

Posted by: Kathy at December 25, 2006 5:54 PM

I enjoyed your comments, Adam... and I'm looking forward to seeing this movie when it hits DVD.

Posted by: Mary at December 25, 2006 7:01 PM

I think one thing missed in this review is that there's a whole lot less Ben Stiller-ism in this movie than there is in a lot of the other things he's done. Most of his movies involve bad things happening to his regular Joe character (or a complete nutball, but those characters are often interesting), and then us supposed to be either laughing at them or feeling sorry for him. His characters never really do anything, they just show up and meander through a circus of increasingly unfortunate and stupid mishaps. This movie actually had Ben Stiller's character doing things for most of it, making it much more enjoyable. I could've done without the sad sack family angle, but the movie was a better direction for Ben Stiller to go than most of the stuff he has done recently.

Posted by: Emily at December 25, 2006 8:43 PM

Movie Exec (hair slicked back Patrick Bateman-esque): And then, the museum...comes...TO LIFE! (cue smoke and The Final Countdown by Europe)

Ben Stiller / Entire Room: GENIUS! (cue applause)

Cut.

Posted by: Double-good Yeah Uh-huh Alright at December 25, 2006 11:20 PM

clearly indicating a desperation to prove an intelligence

Or I could just write like that. Clearly, you've seen a substantial enough set of my compositions to make that determination. Clearly, you're also a rhesus monkey. Clearly, I can make that determination based on the evidence at hand.

I agree with Ike. There are a slew of good movies in theatres right now and Adam decides to set fire to his 10 spot instead of checking one out? He should be castrated!

Wow, that's two votes for selective breeding based on cinematic taste! What a world, friends.

Name one of these "good movies" of which there are a "slew". The theater is rife with trash right now, one of the more disappointing holiday cinema seasons in recent memory. Based on my opinion, please proceed to your nearest physician for sterilization. On your way, try to excuse me for enjoying a trite distraction as a film-going experience. It'll be hard, I'm sure. Also, work on a plan for the rest of your life that includes not watching a single film that opposes anyone anywhere's taste. It's pretty dangerous, otherwise. Mine isn't going so well, but I persevere, even unto now.

And with an attitude like that, hopefully you never will be. There are enough joyless parents in the world.

Um, what? Joyless? What attitude again? This comment is just a complete enigma. That I "don't understand kids"? Is that it? That I liked this film? That I thought our illustrious reviewer was out of line with his critique? Which part makes me a bad candidate for parenting? Could I not just be too young for kids? Perhaps have not have found "the one" with which to continue my family legacy? Could I perhaps be medically incapable of procreating? I'm confused how you've deduced that I would be a "joyless parent" in any event. I'm so joyful your own kids definitely like me better than you. Your wife too. We like to sit around and draw unfounded conclusions based on your opinion about movies. We just laugh and laugh...

and I'm looking forward to seeing this movie when it hits DVD.

It's easily worth a matinée price, and the big screen adds something to the scale of the setting and some of the elements. At $10 it's tenuous, at $5 it's well within acceptability.

It's fantastic how my original post, which was entirely on topic I might add, has spiraled into this mess. Oh intertron, how your waxing webs weave woefully wending wiles. Alliteration totally proves I'm intelligent, right? God, I'm so desperate to prove it. I need this. I desire your endorsement, interweb, deny me no longer!

Posted by: Adam Michel at December 26, 2006 3:22 AM

JESUSFUCKINGCHRIST.you know what happen when flame wars spiral out of control? it stops snowing in new jersey.

Posted by: isupportaadam at December 26, 2006 9:52 AM

OK--back to the topic kids.

Phillip, we get it. You are smarter than the rest of us because movies like this are sooo below your extremely high level of intelligence. What's the matter with cartoony laughs? Were you never a child? Do you think this movie was made for its grand social, cultural and artistic statement? Was Bugs Bunny?

My kids (12, 9 & 8) belly laughed throughout the whole movie! I was mildly amused through most of it and even laughed out loud a few times. But this movie wasn't made for me or you. It was made to give my kids belly laughs on Christmas Day. They have been chuckling about the movie and riffing lines all morning. Isn't that what it's all about? Or is it your high brow opinion that counts?

If you guys don't like these movies and are loathe to sit through them for the review, why don't you find someone with a different perspective who can give an honest opinion from a different point of view.

Posted by: wsapnin at December 26, 2006 11:18 AM

First off: I kinda doubt anyone would read anything this far down, but here goes.

I enjoyed Jumanji, I like comedy that makes kid laugh and, yeah, being a Berkeley drama department grad, I sure as hell appreciate something that goes for entertainment and not to be of some high-browed message.

HOWEVER, I think the point of review was that it's so easy for these holiday kid comedy flicks to be an empty "safe" movie that treats children like easy targets. This genre has so much more potential to be better, and there are a lot of examples.

Don't you rather have your kids see some entertaining flicks that's actually good? Just watching the trailer I'm sure as hell the movie won't come any closer to any good holiday kid movie that leaves kids with more than just "belly laugh", though there's nothing wrong with it, mind. Kids get so used to junk in everry aspects of their life and don't you rather wan them to know there are something better?

Kids are smart. And I want them to be smarter. I mean, am I wrong to think there could be more "Mutilda" and "It's a wonderful life"?

Anyway, I think I won't see this movie. Not in theatre, at least. Unless otherwise convinced. Dunno, I could change my mind and this could be a good fun, but I trust the review on this site. Isn't that why we all check this site?

Posted by: YOCEAN at December 26, 2006 3:21 PM

i saw this movie and it was bad.
the idea for the plot is actually good but the way its executed is not good. at all. the acting is just bad and the character development is barely there. i do not like ben stiller, however i did see this movie because it was a holiday type movie, and i thought perhaps it would do away with my ben stiller hatred. no such luck.
even the cute animals and the easter island head werent as funny as they could have been. nothing was really developed enough to stand out, except obnoxious owne wilson and whoever played octavious. owen wasnt funny.
noen of it was relaly funny. robin williams character stands out well above stiller's lame "dad". thats pretty sad.
anyway,
i wouldnt recommend this movie to anyone, not even when it comes out on dvd.

Posted by: WTF at December 26, 2006 6:15 PM

What I don't understand is the sentiment that, because it's Christmas, there should be no flaming. So it's okay for people to anonymously berate each other and one up the other intellectually every other time of the year except Christmas? Because there's a supposed warm and cozy feeling that many get during this time of the year? That's ridiculous. The morons won't turn off their idiocy, immaturity, or jerkiness just because some holiday lights are up, someone is drinking eggnog, and A Christmas Story is getting its annual 24 hour marathon on TNT/TBS/USA.

It will always be easier for those who desire to hide behind the anonymity of the Internet and insult others. It's not cute, funny, or okay in January, April, or October. So, please, can we move beyond "It's Christmas, where's your sense of decency?" bullshit, and realize it's probably best to ignore the petulant comments? I'm no expert on fire, but doesn't a flame extinguish (eventually) when you stop adding logs?

Unfortunately, once a site starting generating more hits, it's inevitable that the influx will include idiots as well as the intelligent and insightful. Why does this surprise anyone?

Posted by: Daphne at December 26, 2006 9:45 PM

I just saw this movie at an IMAX theater. It was packed full and I had to sit in the second row, which was painful and probably distorted my perception of the movie. In the end, it was just OK. My kids got bored about half way through. I was hoping for a better movie, because the concept, I thought, was brilliant. There was so much more that could have been done to make it a good movie. Alas that didn't happen. If your kids are begging to see this, it is better than The Santa Clause III or Deck the Halls, but take them to Happy Feet first. Or Charlotte's Web.

Posted by: Suzy at December 26, 2006 10:55 PM

Come on livvie, put me in my place. Call me names. ZING ME!

quote:
>you [...] ugly

Feel the power of the dark side!

Flames are fun. Anyone who gets their feelings hurt shouldn't be on teh internets. Check out the comment threads on thesuperficial some time. Those folks are a riot. (actually the recent wave of nic-switching is kind of lame but still...)

Adam - One good movie? There was a hint in my last post...
quote:
>He should be castrated!

Posted by: sif at December 26, 2006 11:52 PM

This could have been predicted. Phillip, my friend, you have yoursefl a backlash. You snubbed too many 'safe' movies, so now there is an automatic defense popping up to stop this one from sharing the same fate.

It seems to me (and I admit, I may be mistaken) that some of you stauch defenders took offense to what looked like an honest admittance of bias. You snap at Phillip, asking if he was ever a child, and saying he is either being snobby and pretentious or has a heart two sizes too small.

As you said: the movie isn't an award winner. It is just a midly entertaining time killer, and if you weren't in that frame of mind (as he admits he wasn't), you won't enjoy it. So why get upset at him for saying that very thing? You end up repeating the same conclusion he had, but fault him for doing so.

And how many movie critics you know ever say that their opinion is skewered because of personal bias? They all are, but how many ADMIT to it? THat was Phillip's caveat to those who felt the way you did. The snarky comments he made, were you really that suprised by them HERE? Of course he was going to sound bitchy. THe word is right at the tope pf the site. If you did not want such a review, why come here, knowing the reviewer was going to do such jokes?

As for the flaming and such, come on now. Telling someone they don't deserve to procreate because of some perceived lack of education and personal worth is as classy and witty and my niece calling someone an "assbutt". And who decied that what determined the proper level of intelligence to be worthy of reproduction? You? Forgive me if I don't automatically consider a complete stranger trustworthy enough to determine the progenitors of the human race.

Posted by: Vermillion at December 27, 2006 2:13 AM

I just like the idea that Owen Wilson is small enough that someone could step on him.

Posted by: MRod at December 27, 2006 11:07 AM

Well, I've seen this one and Eragon, and I'd see this one twenty more times in a row before I'd see Eragon ever again.

It was fluff. If you dislike fluff, don't see it. Yeah, there were big gaping logical holes in the plot. But there were still moments of silliness, and it wasn't painful to sit through (re: Eragon, unless you were MST3K'ing it, or something actively insulting like Barnyard.)

I'm not going to work up a vitriolic sweat over something so mild-mannered and relatively inoffensive. The review, for all its lack of interest, was pretty much on target. A disposable review for a disposable movie.

Posted by: Wednesday at December 27, 2006 1:35 PM

My family and I saw this a couple of days before Christmas. I'm the youngest (in my mid-20s). We went because we all wanted to see a movie, and wanted to see one that wouldn't a) have my sibling and I averting our eyes during the sex scenes, or b) my father cringing at the chick-flick-ness of it or c) boring any one of us to tears because it is three hours long.

You know what? We really enjoyed it. Yes, it is a kid's movie, but sometimes those can be entertaining for adults, too. This isn't "The Incredibles" (which I thoroughly enjoyed). And there are some actual plot problems that might be addressed by someone who viewed the movie as it was intended. I don't think this is necessarily a bad review - it is just irrelevant. I agree that perhaps someone who appreciates the genre should be tasked with rating the quality of a member film. I don't go around reviewing samari epics - I don't quite get them, and I never like them, so clearly it doesn't make sense for me to pass judgement on the quality of one over the other.

Posted by: Lollygagger at December 27, 2006 3:41 PM

It was not very funny, but it was still kinda fun.

Posted by: Sunsneezer at December 28, 2006 8:37 AM

Actually, I love "kids movies", and many of them are great! Ice Age, Shrek (though it has adult humor), I love kids shows, such as Foster's Home for the Imaginary Friends.Powerpuff Girls, and "kids entertainment" that is good can entertain anyone! I dont need sex, blood, and gore in my movie for it to be good. That being said, Night at the Museum was a tad bit bland. I will agree. A total of 5 times I laughed out loud, and hard at that. Particulary scenes with the old men and the cavemen. The cavemen were the funniest thing in the movie. I feel that the movie had so much potential! But the movie reeked of "half way jobness". I know its not a real word, but it sums up the movie nicely!

Posted by: Loni at December 29, 2006 3:13 PM

Is it just me or does Ben Stiller look like Skeletor in that pic?

And yes, I had nothing constructive to add to the commentary.

Posted by: Angel H. at December 30, 2006 9:07 AM

"hey matt, we could give a shit who you think is cuter. I have a feeling your ( no parent) also.. saved ya some typing there IKE

Posted by: pasadenamike at December 23, 2006 11:55 PM"

Yeah, and I have a feeling "your" a [needle-dicked] hetero-fascist moron. #149 on revengeworld.com (manpics)

and no Angel, you're not the only one who thinks Stiller looks like Skeletor.

Btw, Pajiba: ever heard of a flick called "Bonneville"? Jessica Lange, Kathy Bates, Joan Allen & Christine Baranski star and I never heard about it until tonight browsing thru the IMDB. Supposedly it came out in September.

Posted by: matt at December 30, 2006 9:27 PM

Am I the only one who thought Mickey Rooney was dead?

Posted by: Graham at December 30, 2006 10:48 PM

If anyone is still reading these comments at this point, I have to add that we took our kids, ages 6 and 11, and they laughed their, er, heads off. Oh no, does this mean my children have lowest common denominator idiot genes? Get real people, it's a KID'S movie. It's a movie for KIDS. The "plot" only exists in theory-- it's much more about the special effects and action. Andy you know what? Sometimes that's okay. It's nowhere near as insulting/offensive as all the talking aninmal flicks we had to sit through last year.

p.s. My kids are no Berkley drama dept. grads, but they loved Matilda, too.

Posted by: sarah at December 31, 2006 11:10 AM

Agreed, Sarah. You people are taking this movie review too seriously. No one wants to watch Citizen Kane the day after Christmas, for God's sake. Pull your pretentious heads out of your asses and save the snobbery for the next persecution-complex fueled New Millenium Nigga tirade where it belongs. See you there!

Posted by: Matt 2.0 at December 31, 2006 11:54 AM

No one wants to watch Citizen Kane the day after Christmas, for God's sake.

Speak for yourself, prole.

Posted by: Garant at January 1, 2007 3:15 PM

"Were you never a child? Do you think this movie was made for its grand social, cultural and artistic statement? Was Bugs Bunny?"

Actually, Bugs Bunny did have brilliant cultural commentary - check it out again sometime!

Posted by: Alarmjaguar at January 1, 2007 3:37 PM

Took my boys, ages 8 and 12, to see this yesterday. I had read the review here beforehand, as well as the comments, so I had pretty much no expectations whatsoever. It was a crap shoot.

Laughed my ass off. Sure, part of it was purely a knee-jerk reaction to the laughter rolling out of my children, but still... I'll take a good laugh however I can get it these days. So many movies now are judged on how 'real' they are, or how much they delve into issues/politics/nerve-grinding-relationships, etc. Personally, I get enough reality every single day when I go to work or have yet another fun-filled psychotic email from my estranged sister. I don't need or want it in my entertainment, at least not consistently. The occasional thought provoking movie can hold me over for ages. More often I'll take a belly laugh at the expense of a T-Rex shaking its ass like a damned Golden Retriever.

Throw the bone!

Posted by: Nola at January 1, 2007 10:34 PM

Good god, it's the apocalypse. This is what happens when I let my eye off Pajiba for a week or so. Some revelation is at hand!

My remedy is for all ya'll to take your knob adjusters for "self righteousness," "bombastic intelligence," and "assholery" and turn them from 11 back down to say, 7 or 8 like usual around here. Aye yaye yaye.

Posted by: slick at January 2, 2007 12:09 AM

Sorry Garant, I meant to say "no one that knows what a hyperbole is wants to watch 'Citizen Kane'...". Thanks for the unnecessary correction. Prick.

Posted by: Matt 2.0 at January 2, 2007 12:24 AM

There there Matt, we all ignored your adorable little opinion of Citizen Kane once already. Run along now and don't forget to go potty before bedtime.

Posted by: Nikolay at January 2, 2007 7:40 AM

Angel, I was thinking he looked a little like Killface. Who also resembles Skeletor.

Hmm... male anorexia?

Posted by: MRod at January 2, 2007 1:09 PM

My husband and I went to see this New Year's Eve, and I have to admit I like it, although I'm not a big Ben Stiller fan; he's just too short and too intense and too too (although I did like him as Mr. Furious in "Mystery Men").

I read the Pajiba review as a matter of habit before I saw it, because I always like to get the Pajiba angle.

Things I liked: That the film seems to encourage people to learn more about history. That the characters interested in history and learning in the film aren't denigrated or ridiculed (with the exception of Rebecca referring to herself as "the history geek"). I nearly busted a gut when Owen Wilson's character said, "I ain't quittin' you!" The sense of regret Larry displayed when the caveman got caught outside the museum; as though he finally realized his responsibility. Robin Williams actually didn't play Robin Williams for once. His portrayal of TR was exactly appropriate.

Things I didn't like: Not the fault of the film, but when Ricky Gervais's character tells a museum patron to "Control your young," a talkative child right behind us said, "He's acting stupid," and the child's dad said, "Yeah, he is stupid." Right, because expecting parents to control their children and not let them touch the not-meant-for children exhibits (not all museums have turned into The Science Place) is "stupid."

I wasn't real fond of the ex-wife; her character seemed to be included in the film just as a nag. I've never seen Dick Van Dyke play a bad guy before and that kind of messed with my fondly-held traditions just a bit.

But overall I thought this was exactly what it set out to be: fun entertainment, not too deep, a little something to appeal to everyone. And I have to admit I got pretty tickled at the Easter Island head's stiff-lipped "dum-dum" and "gum-gum" utterances.

Posted by: Noelegy at January 2, 2007 2:07 PM

thank you everyone! i had promised to take my 3 year old to a movie and thought this would be the most suitable...with so many people ragging on how crappy this movie was going to be, i went in with the lowest of expectations...and had a GREAT time! i love when that happens--expect crap, have a great time vs. the opposite: expect a great film and leave so disappointed....thanks again all!

Posted by: maxpurr9 at January 8, 2007 7:24 PM

I went to see this last night with my boyfriend (I read reviews after I've seen a film).

We both laughed PLENTY through this film.
Plus I have only seen Dick Van Dyke in Mary Poppins... I think, Was he also in 'Chitty Chitty Bang Bang?' And It was just cool to see that he still looked the same.

Also Steve Coogan was in it... which reminded me that I had to go rent Alan Partridge out as bf hasn't seen it.

And it was Really funny seeing Ricky Gervais 'Acting' At the end .. the look in his eyes was just priceless.

I came out thinking "this is the best film I've seen since 'Happy Feet'" Although now I'm wondering If I saws 'Pans Labyrinth' in between...

Posted by: sarah at February 26, 2007 6:21 AM

It's nice to see that Dick Van Dyke can still dance and Mickey Rooney (who's been acting since the '30s) can still kill arse. Cheers, old timers!

Posted by: Tony at March 5, 2007 11:35 AM

I'm not usually a fan of this cheesy and cliched kind of film, but I did enjoy it. At the very least there are some cool visual effects and a couple one chuckle inducing laughs. Overall, it was mildly entertaining and what more do you want after opening presents and stuffing your face like a pig?

Posted by: Thizzle at May 22, 2007 6:46 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time