web
counter
 

New Year's Eve Review: Like Being Fellated by a Weed Whacker

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (30)



movies-7-reasons-to-.jpg

Last February, before a trailer had been spliced together with the entrails of Rainbow Killer’s career, before the marketing blitz had rolled out, and even before filming had begun on New Year’s Day, I took a stab at predicting the entire plot of New Year’s Day based solely on the casting. I was 80-85 percent correct. In fact, if I was guilty of anything in my prediction, it was assuming too much: I expected that there would be a common association between more characters instead of mostly isolated subplots that didn’t even bother with the tenuous connection.

Yet, while I knew almost every detail of the plot to New Year’s Eve going in, nothing could prepare me for the experience of watching the movie. It was like being pelted by dead puppies: So cute, but so lifeless and painful. Director Garry Marshal machine-guns dead puppies at the audience, inanimate balls of cuddly, limp broken bodies with sharp teeth that take one gash after another out of moviegoers’ souls, until the audience is covered in bruises and buried in a confetti of matted fur and dead-puppy gore.

It’s a gruesome, hollow, shitty meaningless poor excuse for a film. Awful doesn’t even begin to explain it. It’s grim, miserable and unpleasant, joyless and irritating, and demeaning to the intelligence of bullfrogs. In structure, it’s no different than Valentine’s Day: A lot of recognizable faces haphazardly stitched together like a blow-up Frankenstein, lit with a heat lamp to keep the mushy leftovers warm, and scored by a drunk who can’t keep his finger off the goddamn SWELL button. If you want a plot synopsis, just read my prediction. Halle Berry played the nurse to the dying Robert DeNiro character, while Sarah Paulson played the other pregnant woman, but it’s otherwise almost entirely accurate. It’s a nearly two-hour movie with literally 21 main characters, not even including smaller roles for Common, James Belushi, Joey McIntyre, Larry Miller, Alyssa Milano, and Cary Elwes, which means that each main character gets maybe nine or ten minutes of screen time apiece. It’s impossible even to critique performances because no one is onscreen long enough to make an impression, and the very idea of chemistry between any two actors is preposterous. They’re just character husks filled with teeth that have been Crest white-stripped down to the gleaming white nubbins.

It’s like a movie based on a Times Square brochure that’s 75 percent ad space. New Year’s Eve is actually a two-hour commercial for three other films, a dozen electronic companies, and the fading careers of most of the stars. Even the blooper reel at the end of the film is painful to watch because the actors, each of whom probably spent only two days on set, know each other so little that when they screw up a line, instead of laughing, they seem awkwardly apologetic. It’s a remarkably stupid film, wish-fulfillment wrapped around a gooey New Years’ ball of suck that never seems to drop, a dumb movie for dumb people who like dumb things. So please, if you’re a simple-minded moron who doesn’t have three brain cells to rub together then, by all means, go see this movie. It is specifically tailored to your limited capacity for intelligent thought.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The Sitter Review: A Mundane Comedy that Defiantly Wears Its Dick on Its Sleeve | New Dark Knight Rises Poster Will Melt the Motherf*cking Cowl Off Your Face









Comments

Bummer! I was really looking forward to this movie!!

Psyche! Not. I'm messin with you. As even if.

Posted by: klingonfree at December 9, 2011 11:56 AM

I'll be in my garage.
With my Snapper.
Alone.
Better make sure I have enough 2-Stroke Oil first.

Posted by: bleujayone at December 9, 2011 12:05 PM

It is specifically tailored to your limited capacity for intelligent thought.

SIKE it's actually good, right?

Posted by: the new transported man at December 9, 2011 12:19 PM

Letterman had Jessica Biel on the other night (and you MUST Google the pics of her in the white Victoria Beckham dress). Letterman read her a list of the "performers" in this movie and asked her if she was actually performed in any scenes with any of them in this movie, and she told him she didn't.

Posted by: Meander at December 9, 2011 12:28 PM

Jessica Biel's ass could, if used properly, heal the divide between Democrats and Republicans.

Posted by: The Kilted Yaksman at December 9, 2011 12:52 PM

Sounds like the perfect movie for the Twitter generation, if it wasn't full of old people.

Posted by: Slash at December 9, 2011 12:54 PM

Beautiful review. I would have been shocked if this movie was anything but horrible.

Posted by: Dave at December 9, 2011 1:44 PM

Your dead puppy analogy and bullfrog quip makes this among your most skillfully scathing. As usual, the good that comes of the existence of a bad movie I will never see is my reading your review of it. Clever observation on the outtakes at the end too.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at December 9, 2011 1:46 PM

demeaning to the intelligence of bullfrogs...

Did you know that some West African bullfrogs in single sex populations will spontaneously change from male to female? Life... finds a way.

Too bad Garry Marshall couldn't find his way to an AARP membership and out of the director's chair. But as Darth said, excellent review; all these terrible movies at least make good fodder for the ol' Rowles bitch slap.

Posted by: RobP at December 9, 2011 2:16 PM

I already knew anything with SJP sucks, and a movie named after a holiday that's not a horror will suck too.

But the title of this article was hilarious

Posted by: glyrics at December 9, 2011 3:08 PM

I knew this would just be a rehash of Valentine's Day as soon as I found out about this movie's existence, so I can't say I'm really surprised with your review, Dustin.

Posted by: Mr X at December 9, 2011 3:57 PM

Ebert had a pretty funny one-star negative review of this as well that's worth checking out. Not as good as his zero-star reviews of Jaws: The Revenge or Caligula, but still amusing.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at December 9, 2011 5:53 PM

You know, in my years reading Pajiba, I've read an awful lot of hilariously gruesome and retch-inducing descriptions of terrible movies, but something about the idea of having dead, bloody puppies cannonballed into my face trumps all of those prior feelings of squickyness. You've outdone yourself today, Dustin.

Posted by: Amanda6 at December 9, 2011 7:02 PM

"Like Being Fellated by a Weed Whacker"

Doesn't matter had sex.

Posted by: Salad_Is_Murder at December 10, 2011 12:40 AM

I was able to derive some joy from Valentine's Day because Jennifer Garner is awesome and I wasn't expecting anything but apparently NYE is like infinity times worse...

...but if it beat Twilight at the box office, I would not complain. Wonder about America's taste, sure, but I do that on a daily basis.

Posted by: Sadie at December 10, 2011 4:17 AM

They replaced The Muppets with this at the local theater.

There Is No God.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at December 10, 2011 9:25 AM

So Dustin, does this topple Jack and Jill (or Bucky Larson)? Does this movie have Nick Swardson in it?

Posted by: Adrien at December 10, 2011 12:37 PM

It's depressing to see Lea Michelle actually get a movie role. Out of all the talentless idiots on TV likely to star in a movie eventually, her's was the one I was least eager to see.

I'd rather watch the Miz and Flavor Flav in a PG-13 family comedy with Snooki as the main love interest than watch a Lea Michelle movie.

Posted by: Devil Child at December 10, 2011 12:43 PM

Adrien: It was bad, but it's not even in the same league as Jack and Jill or Bucky Larson. Those were crimes against criminals.

Posted by: Dustin Rowles at December 10, 2011 1:47 PM

It's depressing to see Lea Michelle actually get a movie role. Out of all the talentless idiots on TV likely to star in a movie eventually, her's was the one I was least eager to see.

Okay...Lea Michelle may be incredibly annoying and idiotic at times but she is FAR from talentless. You can dislike her all you want but I think calling her talentless is a bit unreal.

Posted by: KC.com at December 10, 2011 2:52 PM

My significant others coworkers keep trying to bribe me into forcing him to go see this with me. I have told them repeatedly that while I am all for making him suffer through something he has no interest in for the sake of my own amusement, I am not willing to punish myself in the process.

So we decided that I am going to drag him to Beauty and the Beast when it is rereleased in January. I will print out all of the lyrics for him so that he can also sing along.

Posted by: DominaNefret at December 10, 2011 2:58 PM

But the real question is: What song does Jon bon Jovi sing at the end?

Posted by: Nikkers at December 10, 2011 6:46 PM

I'd rather have my eyeballs taken out and thrown on a blender on high speed than go see this movie.

Posted by: MRod at December 10, 2011 9:45 PM

Your dead puppy analogy and bullfrog quip makes this among your most skillfully scathing. As usual, the good that comes of the existence of a bad movie I will never see is my reading your review of it. Clever observation on the outtakes at the end too.
if you interested, please check this exciting club for fun goo.gl/R6pfL
Thank you very much.

Posted by: kengao46 at December 11, 2011 9:32 PM

Hey, now quit fucking around with all the niceties and tell us how you REALLY feel about this movie!!!!

Posted by: handy_man at December 11, 2011 9:57 PM

Having read this, now I want you guys to review Love, Actually. I need more bitchery after Bobby Finger's devastating analysis on the Hairpin!

Posted by: Ageha at December 14, 2011 9:59 AM

Interesting article. It is unfortunate that over the last 10 years, the travel industry has already been able to to deal with terrorism, SARS, tsunamis, bird flu, swine flu, as well as first ever real global tough economy. Through it the industry has proven to be robust, resilient and dynamic, locating new approaches to deal with adversity. There are always fresh challenges and chance to which the sector must again adapt and react.

Posted by: find your power animal at January 6, 2012 3:30 AM

New Year's Eve Review: Like Being Fellated by a Weed Whacker I was recommended this web site by my cousin. I am not sure whether this post is written by him as no one else know such detailed about my difficulty. You're incredible! Thanks! your article about New Year's Eve Review: Like Being Fellated by a Weed WhackerBest Regards Cindy

Posted by: android market at January 30, 2012 3:45 AM

New Year's Eve Review: Like Being Fellated by a Weed Whacker I was suggested this web site by my cousin. I am not sure whether this post is written by him as nobody else know such detailed about my problem. You are incredible! Thanks! your article about New Year's Eve Review: Like Being Fellated by a Weed WhackerBest Regards Rolf

Posted by: invest liberty reserve at January 30, 2012 3:45 AM

Couldn't have said it better myself.

Posted by: Federico Garduno at February 4, 2012 11:02 AM