web
counter
 

New to Instant Netflix: Peter Jackson's Best Film to Date: Heavenly Creatures

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (26)



heavenly-creatures-hed.jpg

The story of Pauline and Juliet as told in Peter Jackson’s Heavenly Creatures is one of whimsy and fantasy, of schoolgirl infatuation, and of complicated family relationships that ultimately takes a dark, violent and almost sudden turn toward the macabre. While it feels like an abrupt and out-of-character development, Jackson manages to both prepare you for it and leave you nevertheless surprised, drawing us in from the opening scene and creating something infinitely compelling out of what amounts, in the first 90 minutes of a 99 minute film, to little more than a intense friendship between two girls.

The story behind Heavenly Creatures is all the more fascinating because it’s based closely on true events.

The story concerns a New Zealand schoolgirl, Pauline (Melanie Lynskey). Pauline is quiet, timid, and a little overweight. Her life is changed dramatically when Juliet and her wealthy parents move to town. Juliet and Pauline strike an immediate and intense friendship, bonding over their shared interest of art, of the opera, and of movie stars. There is something a little uncomfortable about their relationship, however, especially for 14-year-old girls in the 1950s. They show affection a bit too readily, and their infatuation with one another is such that, when forcibly separated, they become inconsolable. Juliet, moreover, is stricken with a case of tuberculosis and, while recuperating, through letters and a shared sense of romanticism over Juliet’s illness, the two form an even stronger, almost unbreakable bond.

That relationship becomes complicated when Juliet’s parents divorce. It means, for Juliet, that she will have to relocate to South Africa, an unimaginable separation for both Pauline and Juliet. The two thus conspire to a last, deadly resort. For those of you unfamiliar with the true account of Pauline and Juliet, I wouldn’t want to spoil it for you entirely. But if you are curious, a good place to start is the Wikipedia page of mystery novelist Anne Perry. It’s a gripping story, and I doubt that pre-existing knowledge of it would take much, if anything, away from the film.

That’s because Heavenly Creatures, as the saying goes, is more about the journey than the destination, even if that shocking destination culminates in blood (depicted in the film’s opening scene). Heavenly Creatures also represents Peter Jackson at his best, in that brief but wonderful period in his career that also includes Dead Alive and The Frighteners when Jackson had only his massive talent with which to work, before that was waylaid by a giant ego and millions and millions of dollars of other people’s money. Undoubtedly Jackson is a brilliant director, and his latest,Lovely Bones, could have been as equally compelling, fantastic, and dark as Heavenly Creatures had Jackson’s need to show off not gotten in the way.

It helps that Heavenly Creatures is such a small, intimate story populated with few characters and little in the way of actual developments leading up to the film’s tragic denouement. Jackson, who co-wrote the script with Fran Walsh, borrowing heavily from Pauline’s diary, seamlessly fills those gaps with vibrant, lush and eye-popping fantasy sequences. More importantly, Jackson decides to focus not on the crime committed at the end of the film, but on the friendship that drives Pauline and Juliet to commit such an act, regarded as one of the most evil, despicable and callous crimes of the era. Thanks to Jackson’s ability to develop those characters, as well as their friendship, we understand their motivation, even if we cannot quite sympathize. It’s shocking, but not exactly appalling.

The performances, too, are remarkable, especially that of Kate Winslet, in her first major film role. Nineteen at the time, Winslet brilliantly brings her 14-year-old character to believable life, even if her face doesn’t quite look the age. Melanie Lynskey, plucked from obscurity, also does an exceptional job of selling that almost out-of-control midway point between obsession and creepiness (Weird Fact: Lynskey also had a recurring character in “Two and a Half Men” named Pauline Parker). The rest of the cast suitably fits Jackson’s magical realist world, a world where Orson Welles is not just the devil, but a devil that roams the streets, and a devil with whom the teenage girls wants to sleep.

But it is commanding force of Jackson that turns this dark tale into a dazzling and spirited tragedy. He creates a movie that is both compelling and haunting, long before you understand what is haunting about it. The eeriness simply glides between the schoolgirl giggles, and there is something unshakably sinister in their echoes. It’s a chilling and unforgettable film, a much-needed reminder that, after 15 years of huge, sometimes bloated epics, Heavenly Creatures is the movie that rightfully earned Peter Jackson the right to make them.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



I Swear To God, Kenny Ortega, I Will Strike Your Fancy Ass Down: Dirty Dancing Gets a Remake | I Hope You Know This Will Go Down on Your Permanent Record: I Never Met a Dog I Didn't Like









Comments

This film was my introduction to:

1) Winslet
2) Jackson
3) Mario Lanza

I'm happier because of it.

Posted by: sars at August 9, 2011 2:59 PM

all the best people have chest and bone diseases, it’s all frightfully romantic.

Posted by: gp at August 9, 2011 3:12 PM

This is a great film even though it did disturb the hell out of me in parts. I'm glad you noted the completely different careers the two young actresses have had.

Posted by: Mel C. at August 9, 2011 3:16 PM

Y'know if the producers of "Two and a Half Men" had any sense they would have had Lynskey clobber Charlie in the same way she did in this movie. Well, it would be more fitting than what they went with anyway.

Posted by: bleujayone at August 9, 2011 3:17 PM

This movie was terribly boring. Boring. Although it started to find a decent pace towards the end.

Besides, everyone knows that Meet the Feebles is Peter Jackson's best film to date.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at August 9, 2011 3:18 PM

I love this movie to pieces. It's everything I want in a dark fantasy film, keyword: fantasy.

Posted by: Robert at August 9, 2011 3:48 PM

Thank you, DeistBrawler. I was gonna have to set Rowles straight on that whole "best" buncha crap. Meet the Feebles FTW!

Posted by: ahamos at August 9, 2011 3:57 PM

Isn't Melanie's character in Two & a Half Men Rose???? Or am i missing something?

Posted by: Obvious at August 9, 2011 3:59 PM

I LOVE this movie. Winslet is brilliant in it. Jesus, I feel terrible for, well, no spoilers.

"all the best people have chest and bone diseases, it’s all frightfully romantic"

Best line ever.

Posted by: samantha t at August 9, 2011 4:33 PM

Heavenly Creatures is wonderful and dark, Meet the Feebles makes me wish that brain-bleach was a real thing.

Posted by: Melody Be at August 9, 2011 5:18 PM

I remember Melanie Lynskey being terrible. But then, I wasn't partial to the film in general.

Posted by: Lauren at August 9, 2011 5:20 PM

This movie haunted me in high school. I can remember knowing young people who were this infatuated and romantically careening out of control growing up. I own it and re-watched it recently. Still one of the most disturbing trips you can experience.

Posted by: hoganbcmj at August 9, 2011 5:43 PM

My mother is a huge fan of Anne Perry's work (I've read a few and she's pretty darn good, I think), so it was a huge shock for her when I told her the back story of this movie.

Posted by: Joseph Finn at August 9, 2011 5:59 PM

Unironically, Meet the Feebles is Jackson's best work followed closely by Brain Dead, The Frighteners, Bad Taste, and Forgotten Silver.

Posted by: Adam C at August 9, 2011 6:17 PM

This movie is amazing. The performances are strong, but it also has such imaginative and intense vision.

Posted by: ChickaBoom! at August 9, 2011 6:59 PM

jesus, deist, how can you have found it boring? i mean, winslet runs around the entire movie like she's hopped on dexatrim.

Posted by: gp at August 9, 2011 7:41 PM

This movie disturbed me then and still disturbs me now. Especially now that I am a mother of two pre-teens. You pick up a rock at me, you're going to draw back a nub.

Posted by: Agogagogo at August 9, 2011 8:53 PM

I'll say it incessantly. No other film better portrays the honesty of two children talking. Maybe Espiritu del La Colmena, which I think influenced it a little.

Posted by: Stacy D at August 9, 2011 9:51 PM

I can't say what his best picture is, but this one bored me. The acting was good, I just couldn't get into the story. Might have been a bad day or something, don't remember. I'd give it another chance on Netflix.

Posted by: Protoguy at August 9, 2011 9:53 PM

If you are a girl, let me save you the trouble, do not watch Meet the Feebles, you will not like it, you will want a shower afterwards. The females are all fat, gross, whore puppets and you see them have sex with male characters who are even worse. Save the soap, you'll need it.

Guys who like this, like actually enjoy this movie, are you fucking serious!?! It is hands down one of the most disgusting, pointless movies I have ever had the displeasure of watching. I've been commenting here for years, movies don't usually make me react this way, but fuck that movie.

I'm not saying it's two girls and a cup bad, but it is one step above the movie that shall not be named, and that Anti-Christ movie where Dafoe cuts off his dick.

Jesus Christ on a bagel with lox, I cannot stress the need for brain-bleach enough.

Heavenly Creatures on the other hand, is brilliant.

Posted by: Melody Be at August 9, 2011 10:08 PM

That's the point of Meet the Feebles. To offend. With muppets.

Says so right in the trailer.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at August 9, 2011 10:30 PM

Doesn't make it a good movie.

Posted by: Melody Be at August 10, 2011 12:12 AM

LOVED Heavenly Creatures - I have a soft spot for girls-run-amuck movies to begin with, and this one had the perfect balance of tension, discomfort and fantasy. Reminded me a bit of Paperhouse, directed by Bernard Rose.

Posted by: WriterMonkey at August 10, 2011 1:51 PM

Doesn't make it a horrible atrocity either.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at August 10, 2011 2:22 PM

Really hate this movie, it is really annoying. I am learning about this movie for English and some of my class mates really hates it too. They also thought it was annoying and stupid lmao!

Posted by: chiddybang at August 30, 2011 4:38 AM

Just watched it. Was generally impressed by it. That is all.

Posted by: coryo at October 5, 2011 6:35 PM