blogspot
visitor
My Bloody Valentine Movie Review | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

my-bloody-valentine-3d-20081216104430911_640w.jpg
Insanely, Gloriously, Craperrrific!

My Bloody Valentine 3D / Dustin Rowles

Film Reviews | January 17, 2009 | Comments (87)


You won’t find a lot of folks who’ll argue that the 1980s were a Golden Age of cinema. The dramas were as cheesy as the comedies, and barely anything — even some of the great films in the decade — holds up very well today. Sure, there were a couple of Star Wars movies (holdovers from the 70s), Kubrick was still going strong, Hughes was delivering, and both the Die Hard and Indiana Jones franchises were born. But all in all, the 80s and its big hair and synth-pop soundtracks kind of blew.

Except the horror genre. In the 60s, it was all psychological horror and the 70s were about atmospherics, but if you actually wanted to have a good time at a horror movie, there was no better decade to watch than the 1980s. Limited by their budgets, horror filmmakers had to trade heavily in creativity, and it wasn’t the directors or the actors who were the big stars of the decade, it was the make-up artists. Rick Baker, Tom Savini, and Stan Winston, to name a few. You didn’t go see a horror movie back then to be psychologically tormented, you didn’t go to be completely grossed out, and you certainly didn’t go to watch some gal get the shit beat out of her over and over again. You went because the boogeyman would come out of nowhere, you’d jump out of your seat, and then you’d laugh your goddamn ass off watching some poor teenager’s dismembered head roll down a flight of stairs permanently affixed with fellatio mouth. 80’s slasher films weren’t good, but they sure as hell were entertaining. And they beat the semen-encrusted pants off today’s sterile remakes, which rely heavily on the nihilism and are short on the splattacular laughs. Most of them are dull, and the ones that aren’t just make you sick. They’re uninspiring. I don’t imagine there are a lot of teenagers growing up today who want to be horror-movie directors or make-up artists, which is kind of a goddamn shame.

But then there’s My Bloody Valentine 3D, a movie that’s monumentally awful. But it’s the most fun I’ve had at a horror movie since the last Final Destination flick. What’s particularly troubling about My Bloody Valentine, however, is that I can’t tell if the director, Patrick Lussier (White Noise 2: The Light, Dracula 2000) is either a genius or spectacularly incompetent. The result, here, is the same: Horrendous acting, unbelievably awful plotting, and bloody fucking awesome death scenes. That’s the 80’s way, y’all. You know you’re watching a special kind of movie when a white crowd — and not just white, but Maine white — is yelling at the screen. The typical audience reaction: A bunch of teenagers laughing their fool goddamn heads off for 90 minutes and walking out, exclaiming “Worst Movie Ever!” In other words, My Bloody Valentine is sucktastic. The body count is huge, the gore is off the hook, and the plot is hilariously nonsensical.

My Bloody Valentine opens ten years ago in a small coal town. Tom Hanniger (Jensen ohmyfuckingodawful Ackles) mistakenly forgets to bleed the lines in a coal mine, and six men are trapped inside. One man, Harry Warden, uses a pick-axe to kill off the other five so that he’s got enough air to survive. Once rescued, Harry Warden is in a coma, but wakes a year later and goes on a hospital killing spree, before returning to the coal mine and fantastically murdering a group of teenagers. Only Tom, Axel (“Dawson Creek’s” Kerr Smith), Tom’s girlfriend, Sarah (Jaime King, who as a brunette is a dead ringer for Kimberly Williams), and Irene (Betsy Rue) survive before the police arrive and shoot Harry Warden dead.

Or did they?

Cut to ten years later. Tom — who has been mysteriously absent — returns to sell the coal mine after the death of his father. Sarah, the love of his life, is now married to Axel, who is the town sheriff (and who is also having an affair with a teenager that resulted in a pregnancy), and Irene is the town slut. Guess who dies first? If you said the slut, and if you correctly guessed that she ran buck naked through a parking lot and that a large-chested midget lady got a pick-axe up through the neck seconds before the town slut was poked full of holes, then you, sir, grew up in the 80s! Indeed, on the anniversary of the Valentine’s Day Massacre, either Harry Warden — in full-on coal miner gear — has returned from the dead, or someone has stolen is M.O., which is to brutally swing that pick-axe into the soft parts of the body — the eyeballs, below the chin, the neck, or even up through the taint. Failing that, a nice shovel into the mouth and out the back of the head will do fine, thank you very much.

And who is the prime suspect? Well, Tom, of course. Or maybe it’s the sheriff, who certainly has motive. Or hell: Maybe Harry Warden really is still alive. Ah, but who the hell cares: Just as long as he keeps that pick-axe in motion for 90 minutes, all is good. And there is nary a dead spot in My Bloody Valentine. It’s a full-throttle series of jump-scares and death scenes, punctuated occasionally by some of the worst acting you’ll ever see on the big-screen. Was it intentionally bad, or was it the product of a lot of untalented actors? Beats the hell out of me (though, with Ackles and Ker Smith, I’d lean toward the latter). But it doesn’t matter. I haven’t seen acting so spot-on awful since Kevin Bacon’s Wild Things. And miraculously, the whodunit at the center of the movie actually manages to remain a mystery until the final minutes — you may guess the real identity of the killer early on, but there are enough red herrings to raise doubt until the bitter end.

And what about the Real D 3D effects? Ummm. Cool. In fact, it adds to the gloriously cheesy experience — the format is ideal for horror flicks. With a 3D animated film (which is what most of the CGI films will be screened in from here on out), it’s going to be an immersive, visual treat — it’ll be fun to watch. But with horror films: It actually adds a lot more to the experience. It puts you a lot closer to the business end of a pick-axe. And when you jump out of your seat, you won’t jump forward, that’s for goddamn sure. It’s gimmicky as hell, but then again, the entire movie is beyond preposterous. Still, as far as horror movies go, this is a label that you don’t attached to slasher flicks very often anymore: It’s a motherfucking crowd pleaser.


Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. He lives withi his wife and son in Portland, Maine You can reach him via email, or leave a comment below.


Paul Blart: Mall Cop Review | History is Dead Book Review





Comments

LOVED IT!

If this movie was a girl, I would pretend to be straight for it, take it home to meet my parents, try and hold off on sex with it by telling it that sex is special and worth waiting for, eventually come out to it in college, and then be its best friend and special uncle to its future children.

If this movie was a guy, I'd just take it home and fuck it.

THAT, my friends, is how good it was.

I had a blast.

Posted by: The Pink Hulk at January 17, 2009 1:31 PM

yay!
Making Mr. CherryPie take me to this for my birthday next week. Turning 30 needs a good, cheesy scary movie!

Posted by: CherryPie at January 17, 2009 1:33 PM

You know, I'd never seen Jaime King with darker hair before. How'd I miss that? She looks great!

I'd also add, part of the fun was reading Fangoria before the movie came out, because you did follow the makeup and effects guys and it didn't spoil anything to read about the gags being constructed, it only enriched it all. Then my friend and I would shout "EDIT!" as the shot cut before, say, Jason's axe went through the skull.

Let me just give "Waxwork" a shoutout while we're here. There are many opportunities in life to say "dig it or fuck off!", but who'd know it was a quote?

Posted by: Jay at January 17, 2009 1:38 PM

So I'm going to see Revolutionary Road tonight with a friend of mine. I read another review of this flick this morning from yesterday's paper, in which the reviewer felt similarly that this was kind of an homage to the 80s stuff (although he seemed to feel that the acting was, in fact, purposefully bad), and I think I might treat myself to a double feature today.

I grew up on that stuff. I saw the first MBV back in probably '83 (once it had come out on VHS, which at that time took at least a year from theatrical release). The only thing I really remember from it now is the old lady in the dryer (and please tell me they re-did that scene...), but it's funny, Dustin, that you mention Baker, Savini, Winston, because those guys were my idols at that time. They, and those terrible horror movies, are what got me into movies, and later into film. (Though you did forget Rob Bottin, student of Rick Baker and genius in his own right.) I wanted to do that (FX makeup) for a living; every year for halloween, I was a dead... something. Cheerleader, prom queen, hooker, whatever, as long as there was blood I was happy. I had a core group of friends when I was 15 who would all get together at somebody's house, and we'd all walk down to the video store and rent 6 or 7 movies and stay up all night watching them. We had so much fun with all those crappy movies, because they were fun. This is why I get so mad about these remakes, and the exact reason you mention: they were about having a good time. This: "Most of them are dull, and the ones that aren't just make you sick. They're uninspiring." is it, to a tee.

Wow, I just got all emotional and verbose there. Yeah, I think it's definitely a good day for a double feature.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at January 17, 2009 1:45 PM

Oh, Jay, Fangoria was the *shit*, man. Ha! How I loved that mag at the time.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at January 17, 2009 1:47 PM

Rowles, your hypocrisy knows no bounds.

Posted by: Pookie at January 17, 2009 1:52 PM

Rowles, your hypocrisy knows no bounds.

You're no hypocrite, Dustin, you just like to sound like one.

Posted by: Sean at January 17, 2009 2:10 PM

How come 3D Porn never caught on?

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at January 17, 2009 2:39 PM

Goo.....

Posted by: Pookie at January 17, 2009 2:56 PM

Wanna go see it so bad.

Posted by: Jean at January 17, 2009 3:35 PM

I wholeheartedly agree with the notion that all things shitty in this movie were on purpose, and that the director is in fact a genius. From the profound stupidity of Jamie King's character (waiting to press the alarm and shoot the gun until after everyone gets throughly killed), to the midget chip shot, "Stop yelling at me!", the black sheriff's shady looks, and the ridiculous gore, I think this is one of the funniest deconstructions the horror genre has ever seen. I wasn't entirely sure whether I was laughing at it or with it until Kerr Smith's character said something along the lines of, "I think we're being mocked." After that it was easy to see that everyone involved was definitely in on the joke, and there are plenty of similar moments to solidify the theory that all involved were bounding balls out into meta-movie territory. Best moviegoing experience I've had in a while, bring on the fucking sequel.

Posted by: Willis at January 17, 2009 3:39 PM

I didn't know Kerr Smith was still acting. Or at least working, acting might not be the best description for it.

Posted by: Carrie at January 17, 2009 3:58 PM

Dammit! I was all set to go watch Clint Eastwood in "Dirty Harry: The Retirement Years" and here you go and pique my love of cheesy 80s horror by putting this out.

Decisions...decisions...

Posted by: Fredo at January 17, 2009 4:05 PM

L.O.V.E. 3-D porn? Man, some of the 2-D stuff is bad enough. It's already difficult to find porn in which you DON'T see the woman's kidneys and there ISN'T a "facial." I don't care about that stuff. But if all that were in 3-D? I'd have to quit it altogether.

Oh but I think 3-D porn is called "having sex."

Posted by: Anastasia Beaverhausen at January 17, 2009 4:17 PM

Those of you in favor of women taking facials, Yea.

Those opposed to women taking facials, Nay.


Polls will close at 7:00 P.M.
At 7:30 P.M. the results will be published.

Decision 09

Posted by: Pooke at January 17, 2009 5:07 PM

Yea

Posted by: Pookie at January 17, 2009 5:08 PM

"horror filmmakers had to trade heavily in creativity"
That's the funniest thing you've ever written.

Posted by: Brett at January 17, 2009 5:39 PM

Brilliant.

I was seriously hoping this movie would be sucktastic, craptacular, and/or shitriffic.

Posted by: mc at January 17, 2009 5:42 PM

Maine White got a big laugh out of me. My roommate is from that wicked pissah of a State. But you moved there, if I'm thinking right. You weren't raised with the whole accent and weird Maine customs...

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at January 17, 2009 6:19 PM

I just finished watching the movie "Bill Jack" and I want to learn Karate and go on a spiritual journey like he did. I'm also going to make Coven's "One Tin Soldier" my theme song. We must start to respect each other.

Posted by: Pookie at January 17, 2009 6:27 PM

I abstain from voting. I don't care what happens in anyone else's bedroom. I just don't understand, from a male point of view, why something that's basically masturbation would feel better than finishing during real sex, but I'm not a man, so whatever.

I think the whole 3-D aspect of this might have me climbing the walls. I don't care about watching people get beaned with a pick-ax, but if that pick-ax was coming my way, I might start climbing the seat behind me. And I'm sure the person in that seat would not appreciate it. Better to save it for a rental.

Posted by: Genny (also Rusty) at January 17, 2009 6:40 PM

I don't understand the whole horror movie thing. I don't like to be scared. I've always thought that people who enjoy getting spooked are like people who enjoy pain. That's my theory. I have a lot of theories. Another one is that unicorns are the albino offspring of a torrential affair between a rhino and a horse. What I'm trying to say is that I will not watch this film.

Posted by: Joker at January 17, 2009 6:52 PM

I am so nice, I took my 14yr old niece and some of her friends to see it today. They told there moms they were going to see something with Kate Hudson in . Of course, they wouldn't sit near me. It was fun to watch them yell and scream and laugh a few rows ahead of me. Can't ask for anything more than that. It sucked, but it entertained teenage girls.

Posted by: sean at January 17, 2009 7:00 PM

...because if I'm going to spend the whole fucking day with you at Jo-Ann Fabric listening to you go on and on about some shitty curtains you're going to make for the kitchen window, then the least you can do is indulge me with the occasional milk mustache.

Posted by: Pookie at January 17, 2009 7:07 PM

What? I can't vote? What's this setting deadlines shit? Just another effort to keep the Poor Man down. I'm feeling seriously disenfranchised here, I think there's a lawsuit and a multi-million dollar settlement in this for me ...
+++
Doesn't a craptacular '80s-style horror movies deserve a craptacular '80s-style Joe Bob Briggs body part count? So how many eyes/heads/arms/legs/miscellaneous roll, and how many breastesses?

Posted by: bucdaddy at January 17, 2009 7:10 PM

Due to a last minute technical glitch voting will be extended to 8:00 P.M., and the results will be published at 8:30 P.M.

Sorry for the inconvenience
Director of Elections

Posted by: Pookie at January 17, 2009 7:15 PM

Nay.

White folks talking to the screen? What has happened to America? I might have to see this movie to find out if this happens in my town. I could bring some of my black friends and act all scandalized.

Posted by: greer at January 17, 2009 7:24 PM

You best believe I won't be paying to see this garbage. I'll wait out the 10 day hold and use one of my many promo passes. Promo passes are better known among my circle as "Robert threatened to blog them out of business" passes. Whenever someone fucks up at AMC, I write a nasty e-mail to whoever is in charge of the chain and the corporate office, explaining how awful the experience was. If they ignore my complaint, I fire off another e-mail extolling how many blogs I work for and how quickly I could turn thousands of film goers against their chain. Since they are still afraid of blogs (it's like kryptonite to corporate America), without fail, I receive a fresh stack of coupons and promo passes with a stock apology in the mail. God bless American commerce.

Posted by: Robert at January 17, 2009 7:28 PM

Aye. In the eye.

Posted by: bucdaddy at January 17, 2009 7:35 PM

*Alert* *Alert*

The Polls have now Closed
At 8:30 P.M. the results we be published.

Posted by: Pookie at January 17, 2009 8:05 PM

*Breaking News*Breaking News*Breaking News*

The Facial Amendment has been voted into law.
68% Yea
31% Nay

These results have been certified by the Elections Board and Office of Records, Voting Divison.
Director Of Elections.

Posted by: Pookie at January 17, 2009 8:34 PM

No challenged ballots. No hanging chads. Every vote should be an Internets vote.

Posted by: bucdaddy at January 17, 2009 8:42 PM

Within our great democracy it is the people that dictate the course of our nation's journey. We use the ballot as a way of governing. Voting is what separates us from the uncivilized. One man one vote is the order of the day and the people have spoken.

Posted by: Pookie at January 17, 2009 8:52 PM

*tear rolls down cheek*

Oh beautiful Pajiban skies
For Amber Waves of grain
For purple nipples' majesty
May we not suck in vain!
America! America!
God(topus) bless us every one!
While men may rest
Beers on their chest
And wife's work's never done!

Posted by: bucdaddy at January 17, 2009 9:43 PM

you poet you!

Posted by: Pookie at January 17, 2009 10:01 PM

What is a Godtopus? I hear people here say it all the time.

Posted by: Pookie at January 17, 2009 10:06 PM

Pagan deity.

Posted by: bucdaddy at January 17, 2009 10:36 PM

Well I'm a Pagan, but not a deity.

Posted by: Pookie at January 17, 2009 10:41 PM

I like, ALMOST, want to go see this movie. But then again, my laziness wins out and I'll probably wait the 2 years for it to come to OnDemand and watch it while I try and take a nap. Hopefully we'll have 3D-HDTV by then.

Posted by: kate at January 17, 2009 10:44 PM

Kate, do you have a webcam?

Posted by: Pookie at January 17, 2009 10:58 PM

I was bracing for this review to be extremely harsh, so I was very pleasantly surprised to see that you echoed my feelings about the movie. It was a blast! I was hoping it would be spectacularly ridiculous, and it was all that and more. And, I actually jumped a couple of times from the pick axe swinging toward my skull. I'm also telling myself that the director, actors, and everyone involved was in on the joke and purposefully bad, because it's more fun that way.

Posted by: puregonzo at January 17, 2009 11:57 PM

What the fuck, Pookie? What's with the missing 1%?

Did we get some write-in votes?

By the way, I voted "nay". I prefer my lady to either swallow, let it slide down the ass crack or take it on the milk juggs.

I just don't have any interest in jizzing on my wife's face.

Now. Back in the day, if I was tappin' sum ho with the li'l' bro', I would go down lo and blast that ass 'f da beyotch was givin' sass.

Jus' jack that crack, ya know?

Then wit ma tip drippen I'd let her do sum dick licken of the jizzum, ya dig? Fuuuuu-uck dat.

But no head to face, man, no head to face.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at January 18, 2009 12:00 AM

Anna, if I could "have sex" I wouldn't be so intrigued by the idea of 3-D porn.

Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at January 18, 2009 12:17 AM

By the way, I voted "nay". I prefer my lady to either swallow, let it slide down the ass crack or take it on the milk juggs.

I just don't have any interest in jizzing on my wife's face.


Posted by: L.O.V.E. at January 18, 2009 12:00 AM
________________________________________________________________________


Sorry L.O.V.E., but I just don't see the difference between a facial and a big gulp. One is the "Ark of the Covenant," and the other is the " Holy Grail." Both will get you to the promise land.

Posted by: Pookie at January 18, 2009 12:51 AM

Every woman needs a taste of testosterone once a week. It keeps her "balanced".

Posted by: admin at January 18, 2009 1:18 AM

Now I gotta get a nutt gotta get a nutt gotta get it quick
Ya know because I love this shit so....

Posted by: admin at January 18, 2009 1:28 AM

I've always thought that people who enjoy getting spooked are like people who enjoy pain.

Not necessarily, Joker. For instance, I love horror movies, and I really dislike pain. Like, alot. I really don't like it at all. I run away and hide from pain.

Anyway, this movie was super super fun. I laughed my ass off.
***SPOILER*** God, why do I have to do that for this? What a bunch of whiners people are. Anyway, they totally did dead lady in the dryer!! Yay! ***End Spoiler***
I think a large part of the enjoyment, for me anyway, derived from the lack of that "berserker editing" technique that Dustin is so fond of railing against (and rightfully so). Plus, the scenes set in the dark weren't so dark that you couldn't see what the hell was going on. Also, popcorn for dinner.

And, super awesome bonus: 3-D trailer for Coraline.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at January 18, 2009 2:21 AM

blarrgh. I think pajiba needs a weekend open comment thread, like dlisted recently started. For drunks like myself who have nothing better to do in the wee hours on a Saturday. (just barely sober enough to proofread...) Also: Dr. Horrible rocks. The Hammer is my penis. I love horror movies, will have to see this one asap. 'scuse me, my wineglass still has something in it....must attend to that.

Posted by: s. pisaster at January 18, 2009 2:28 AM

That's a good idea s.pisaster, sometimes in the midnight hour when I've finished with my porn and finished myself off I become very talkative but I don't have anyone to share my ideas with. I've told Rowles to have more threads on the weekend but he don't listen to me, he listens to those socalled darlings of pajiba with their boring stories and homo-erotic leanings. Then we have to listen to Rowles's stories about him being a button man for some goddamn crew when he was in college. I think I'm going to walk down to Mcdonald's and get me some hot cakes and find me one of those comfort girls and tap her before she goes home for the night. My neighbors want me to go to church with them but I'm not mentally ready to stop fighting my man-urges. I'm a bloated mess, I need to feel good about myself.

Posted by: Pookie at January 18, 2009 8:25 AM

(∩_∩)(∩_∩)(∩_∩)You'll find the best selection of hot babes, sexy singles, and beautiful dating right at the exclusive interracial dating community,
*************INTERRACIALLOVING.COM***************.
Come in and stay a while. Post a message, a pic of yourself and check out the hot photo galleries. You are guaranteed to find someone you like here.(∩_∩)(∩_∩)(∩_∩)

Posted by: Anonymous at January 18, 2009 8:36 AM

testing

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 18, 2009 9:37 AM

HA!

Posted by: Pookie at January 18, 2009 9:39 AM

i was really dreading your review of this movie because i freaking LOVED it! every death scene was different, i was laughing my ass off, embarrassed by jumping out of my seat at least twice and totally skeved out by the jaw ripping scene.

Posted by: courtney 1 at January 18, 2009 1:02 PM

Pookie, have to again disagree regarding face vs swallow. Shooting the face is for show, swallowing is for effect. If she swallows their is no disruption. At that exact moment you are exploding its with the dick getting sucked, not you jerking it. Also, you can still get some post-ejaculation sucking.

Hitting the titties is better than the face anyway. I would rather see shiny titties then jizz face.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at January 18, 2009 1:08 PM

(∩_∩)(∩_∩)(∩_∩)

Oh God, the cow noses are back!

FEAR THE COW NOSES!

Posted by: Jerce at January 18, 2009 1:27 PM

Point taken L.O.V.E., but hitting the face is so much more psychologically empowering than your typical swallowing. Swallowing is the end result of a journey, but hitting the face and watching your work get immortalized on your lover's face is a transcending event. When you allow your lover to swallow, she is in fact taking your power away. When hitting the face you are in a way conditioning your lover to bow to your power. In a patriarchal system in which I live a man must make his mark,and hitting the face is the only way his power will be realized.


Swallowing disrupts the life force of your power, it negates all your work and prevents you from having a mentally picture.

Finally, hitting the face is a subliminal picture that crystalizes your ascent, and puts you on the path to your destiny.

Posted by: Pookie at January 18, 2009 1:45 PM

Nay, Nay ..... NAY

Why would I want my power to be realized while having sex is beyond me. Than again reading Pookie makes holes in my brain as usual.

Posted by: Vladimir at January 18, 2009 4:16 PM

I think, splooging the face or: "lovesplattering" is the pinnacle of natural male on female domination. It tells her:

"yeah, I just came all over your face bitch!"

And the female subject respectfully accepts."

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 18, 2009 4:41 PM

Pookie does not avoid women, but he does deny them his essence.

Posted by: Jay at January 18, 2009 5:11 PM

Vladimir I give you the secrets of the pyramids and you throw that shit away for the secrets of the motherfuckin' masked magician. You small insignificant man you, I deliver unto you the gods and you forsake it for knowledge of making a goddamn car disappear. I am through dealing with all of you motherfuckers. I have tried my best to elevate the level of discourse here as it relates to the human condition. I can no longer continue here, I'm done.

Posted by: Pookie at January 18, 2009 5:18 PM

Nice going "Vlad" SEE what you did?

Hey Pook?

you gonna be alright?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 18, 2009 5:25 PM

NOT THE FACE!!!

I don't mind if sex gets a little sticky, but I agree with Slim (I can´t believe I just typed that) that it´s all about men wanting to assert their dominance, which to women feels like aggression and is therefore not sexy.

On the other hand, I see how a more insecure man might get the urge, because let´s be fair, if there is ever a moment when women are in control, it is during fellatio...

Posted by: Pants at January 18, 2009 5:40 PM

The review pretty much confirms the thoughts I had this movie based on the trailer. Fun to watch, but ultimately craptacular. I wish I could see this in the theater, but since I seem to be out of a job it's probably best if I save my $20 for other things. Like my water bill. I do have a couple of free passes since our crappy local theater royally fucked up the sound when we went to see the last Bond movie, but I'm saving those passes for Watchmen. Priorities.

Posted by: stardust_savant at January 18, 2009 6:25 PM

Damnit Vlad. Don't you know how sensitive Pookie gets when he's alone on the weekends, drinking and watching porn?

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at January 18, 2009 6:40 PM

As our resident disapproving teacher with a yardstick in her hand, I would like to point out that once again the comments thread has devolved into nothing but blood drinking, milk moustaches, and anal shenanigans.

Do you people have no shame?

Posted by: Anastasia Beaverhausen at January 18, 2009 9:20 PM

Ana, I do not have any shame. I've been bad and my pants are down. So is that yardstick just for measuring or what?

By the way, Anal Shenanigans is my new favorite band.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at January 18, 2009 9:40 PM

The yardstick is for your naughty hands and this soap is for your mouth.

NAUGHTY! YOU'RE NAUGHTY!

Oh and I'm the lead singer of Anal Shenanigans. We're hoping to get gigs at all the Holiday Inns on the eastern seaboard. Don't read anything into that.

Posted by: Anastasia Beaverhausen at January 18, 2009 11:24 PM

Through the years many women have been delighted to cum on MY face. But when it's MY turn, chicks like PANTS get all "NOT THE FACE"?

I'm sensing some serious hypocrisy here ...

Posted by: bucdaddy at January 19, 2009 1:22 AM

...has stolen is M.O.,


I think you meant HIS M.O.?

Rent someday, gotcha....

Or will it not be as cool on a lame 2D TV?

Posted by: WhoWhatWhere at January 19, 2009 1:41 AM

Listen Daddy and friends, I´d hate to snail trail all over your little sausage fest here, but when a woman loves a man in the face it´s because he´s all up in her thrill, which is a good thing. When I man tries to jizz the phiz he´s marking his territory, which, if my face is anywhere near your fun stuff, is redundant to say the least.

In love and war all is fair but I implore you, when adressing a girl´s visage, please, say it, don´t spray it!

Posted by: Pants at January 19, 2009 5:02 AM

Anastasia Beaverhausen and the Anal Shenanigans! You should totally go on tour with Julie's band.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at January 19, 2009 11:11 AM

might I suggest a compromise...

just have facial in the shower... wet and wild sexy times are fun for all :)

then the girl can just wash it off discreetly while the man gets the satisfaction of having just jizzed on her face... its a win-win

Posted by: Tammers at January 19, 2009 1:36 PM

I´d hate to snail trail all over your little sausage fest here, but when a woman loves a man in the face it´s because he´s all up in her thrill, which is a good thing. When I man tries to jizz the phiz he´s marking his territory, which, if my face is anywhere near your fun stuff, is redundant to say the least.

I *heart* Pants.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at January 19, 2009 1:46 PM

No no no Tammers! this is not up for negotiations. What's next, faking orgasms? Getting a facial in the shower is cheating. The goo must be allowed to do its job, washing it off disrupts the power of the event. I'm getting upset all over again, is anybody listening to me? You fucking people just don't want to listen, the goo is the power, and letting it hit the face is a part of the process that galvanizes and strengthens us.

Posted by: Pookie at January 19, 2009 1:52 PM

Jeez Pookie! How long do you want to leave it on for? Until it gets crusty? And I'm not the kind of girl that jumps up and has to shower the second it touches my skin, but eventually you need to get cleaned up.

Posted by: grinder at January 19, 2009 2:40 PM

Well grinder, you wear make-up all day so what's the big deal. I'm not saying that she should wear it all day. But like when a football player scores a touchdown, he should be able to at least marvel at his work for a couple of moments.

Posted by: Pookie at January 19, 2009 2:56 PM

simmer down Pookie... I meant no disrespect... it was just a suggestion... I have no problem with a guy blowing his wad all over my face if that's what he wants...

but here's a little secret... while you MIGHT think the goo is the power... it's not... the real power is with the woman who LETS you spray her face with your goo... because if she is unwilling... you will damn sure pay for and hear about it... I promise... see... gentlemen... we really DO have all the power when it comes to sex... and I don't hold it over my man... but am willing to do things that HE wants... because I know he wants them... when I moan and beg for him to cum on my tits or my face... its not because I need or want that hot sticky man milk all over me... its because I know he WANTS me to want it.

Posted by: Tammers at January 19, 2009 3:47 PM

Badly needed subject change: While I enjoy looking at both Jensen Ackles and Kerr Smith, no way I'm paying even cheap movie prices to see this. I'll wait for it to show up on cable in about 3 weeks.

Posted by: Slash at January 19, 2009 4:14 PM

Pookie, Pookie,
At least I know you don't have a cross-dressing fetish. Comparing man milk to make-up!
Like Tammers said its about making your man happy and I've done a lot worse than get a milk-stache, the only thing I don't like about that act though is the unpredictablity of it. You don't know where it's going and how much you are getting. Which I suppose is why the dudes like it so much.

Posted by: grinder at January 19, 2009 4:33 PM

Good Lord. A true gentleman gives the woman a heads-up courtesy tap before he blows. That way she can get her face and mouth OUT OF THE WAY.

Posted by: Anastasia Beaverhausen at January 19, 2009 4:43 PM

It's NOT being shown in 3D in my area. That makes me sad. In my pants.

Posted by: Nadha at January 19, 2009 6:00 PM

Good Lord. A true gentleman gives the woman a heads-up courtesy tap before he blows. That way she can get her face and mouth OUT OF THE WAY.


Posted by: Anastasia Beaverhausen at January 19, 2009 4:43 PM
________________________________________________________________________


A courtesy tap? Shiiiiiit, a courtesy tap my ass! This ain't no goddamn democracy.

Posted by: Pookie at January 19, 2009 6:10 PM

Wow, I was gonna avoid this like a syphylitic hooker, but if it evokes the squee's of delight I had as a high schooler in the 80's, watching the REAL "Friday the 13th," "Nightmare on Elm Street," "Dawn of the Dead," "The Fog," and such classics as "I Dismember Mama,"

I HAVE GOT TO SEE THIS SHIT!!!!

Love me some humorous hack-n-slash.

Posted by: dammitjanet at January 23, 2009 12:41 PM

blink, looks around
Oh, sorry to crash the uh, the party, um... I was looking for Donkey Punch? Not, not a demonstration, the review. I'll just, uh...

backs out slowly

Posted by: Sweetie Dahling at January 23, 2009 1:20 PM

i loved that movie it was mind blowing and surprising at the end what tom did. i loved that it was funny with that midget when he killed her and that women runnig naked and that dude saying shes his hooker.what ever happend to that little boy whens hes hiding behind the couch?

Posted by: asabirna ross at January 28, 2009 11:15 AM

it wa sthe most gory filmed classic ive ever seen this whole school year.it rox my sox.

Posted by: sabirna ross at January 28, 2009 11:18 AM

it wa sthe most gory filmed classic ive ever seen this whole school year.it rox my sox.

Posted by: sabirna ross at January 28, 2009 11:19 AM





Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.