monster.jpg
Actually, I Rather Enjoyed My Stay

Monster House / Kerry Benton

Film Reviews | July 21, 2006 | Comments (12)


I’m not a superstitious person by nature, but I’m just a little worried that I might have cracked a mirror or built up a little bad karma somewhere. As I sat in the theater making blind notes in my Moleskine notebook, I was gripped by a sudden and unmistakable feeling of fear. A cold finger of doubt and uncertainty crept into my world.

“I’m supposed to write a review for Pajiba,” I thought. “What if I can’t be harsh? What if the movie’s quite good?” It’s rage and fury I’m best known for, after all, not praise and warmth. Nonetheless, my quavers bode well for you, O viewer, because truly, Monster House proved to be an entertaining and well-executed film.

The basic premise of a haunted house is probably as old as the invention of the words for “haunted” and “house” in ancient Sumerian or whatever. In Monster House, however, the titular domicile, owned by viciously mean-spirited old man Nebercracker (Steve Buscemi), offers up a bit more. The house itself is a remarkably anthropomorphized creature that really, ah, stands up in its own right. Neighborhood kids D.J., Chowder, and Jenny get to do a lot more than just stumble through the scary old crib, which made for a substantially more pleasant 90 minutes. Considering that this appears to be the first major production for both director and screenwriting team, I’d call it an auspicious beginning.

Now, as a rule, I’m a bit skeptical of motion-capture technology because, paradoxically, I think it sometimes comes off as less natural than good classical animation. I must concede, however, that the technology may have finally caught up with expectations. With very few exceptions (and trifling ones at that), the characters are very natural, even vibrant. Each one is fully realized and well cast, from Kevin James’ bumbling cop to Maggie Gyllenhaal’s so-totally-over-this metal-chick babysitter. Jon Heder (of Napoleon Dynamite fame and various ignominy ever since) even managed not to make me angry, which is saying something.

I suppose the crux for any kids’ movie lies in whether the kids will like it and not be either scared or damaged by the experience. I’m probably less than perfectly qualified to gauge the fear quotient or what have you; after all, I was somewhat less than stouthearted as a child (the fire scene in Bambi freaked me right out, and don’t even get me started on Gremlins). For what it’s worth, I didn’t hear any crying or whimpering from the kids in my theater, and a lot of them seemed pretty young.

Then again, it’s probably nearly as important that adults not be bored to tears when they take the kids out to the cinema. It’s always seemed to me that parents grow numb to a lot of inanity, presumably from hundreds of repeated viewings of kids’ shows coupled with a kind of love I, being childless, really just can’t fathom. I feel comfortable saying that those filters won’t really even be necessary with Monster House. I heard the adults laughing every bit as much as the kids (myself included). I suppose many of them have suffered through the endless parade of talking animal movies of late, and I can only imagine how welcome this respite must have been. Beyond that, it’s always fun looking for (or maybe just inventing) references to other movies — I found a Sarlacc Pit and at one point saw something that bore a striking resemblance to the No-Face from Miyazaki’s Spirited Away.

Really, the only gripe I have is that I felt pretty strange walking out of a Halloween-themed movie into the 90-degree swelter of a July evening in Atlanta. Maybe kids don’t care, but my moods are a bit seasonal and, as much as I enjoyed this film, I think I might have been even more receptive in, say, late September or October. Perhaps school and homework offer too much competition or something, but it still seems strange.

The bottom line is that Monster House is fun for the kids without constantly resorting to crudity or outright silliness, is stocked with solid, well-acted characters, and isn’t an ordeal that parents (or older siblings) will have to suffer through. I consider that high praise, particularly given some of the alternatives.

Kerry Benton is a film critic for Pajiba. You can see him in action as “k” on The Supernicety.









Tsotsi | My Super Ex-Girlfriend













Comments

Finally a summer movie to enjoy even if it's a children's flick. I'm glad its good.

Posted by: Candy at July 22, 2006 4:20 PM

I saw this movie yesterday, and I was so happy it was good! Dan Harmon and Rob Schrab are awesome and I was so excited to see their names up there on the screen. My friend and I cheered.

Posted by: Rachel at July 22, 2006 5:43 PM

Damn, I really wanted to see this movie last night, but my friend wanted to see You, Me, and Dupree instead.

Bastard.

But now I'm looking forward to it when I do see it.

Posted by: Amanda at July 22, 2006 8:45 PM

It looks like a fun kid film that adults might enjoy for sure...like The Incredibles, which I liked too, sometimes animation is the way to go, look at Shrek it tweeked the whole fables tradition and offered up new treats for adults and kids. That takes some doing and should be recognized whenever it doesn't come up stale. And yeah, it should have been released at Halloween, maybe even more people would have gone to see it...

Posted by: Gina at July 23, 2006 4:40 PM

This is in no way comparable to The Incredibles. The Incredibles had wit and heart, which I found very lacking in Monster House.

It's better than a lot of the dreck that kiddie movies have become, but it's certainly not one that you'll want to watch over and over again. What was the point of the babysitter's boyfriend, except to be obnoxious? The soon-to-be-absent parents? Even the trip to the video game guru was filler. And despite the effects being less creepy than Polar Express, it's still more visually jolting than visually exciting.

I will say this: it is NOT one of those arch kiddie movies that are really aimed squarely at parents (i.e. Shrek). It is a kiddie movie. They aimed for average and they hit their mark.

Posted by: indigotea at July 24, 2006 12:06 PM

I've only heard good things about this movie; I'm really looking forward to it.

And Gremlins freaked the shit out of me too.

Posted by: Emily at July 25, 2006 12:26 AM

Just watched it this weekend with the kids and wife. We all loved it. My 5 year-old daughter got a wee bit scared toward the end, but never took her eyes off the screen .. neither did I. The CGI is amazing, real .. but not overdone; taking away that 'animated' feel about it. You'll love it.

Posted by: GaryJ at July 25, 2006 1:56 AM

I'm probably less than perfectly qualified to gauge the fear quotient or what have you; after all, I was somewhat less than stouthearted as a child (the fire scene in Bambi freaked me right out, and don't even get me started on Gremlins).

I still cannot watch Gremlins, or even see a picture of a Gremlin, without having a minor panic attack. I was 3 when my parents took me to see this movie, and I have been traumatized ever since. Glad to see I'm not alone. :-)

Posted by: Whitters at July 25, 2006 11:37 AM

This movie was pretty great to watch from both an entertainment, and technical aspect. I found myself rather impressed with the camera work along with the fun characters and story.

Anyone else find it odd that this movie feels different because it wasnt littered with adult innuendos?

Posted by: Ken Hart at July 27, 2006 2:11 AM

What's the deal with moleskins? Why are some people so obsessed with them to the point of blogging about them. I know this computer-nerd [I say that affectionately, not to offend anyone here, but just as a description] guy who actually blogs about them with other people. Its just a notebook!! Why oh why does there have to be an exclusive cult for everything?!! Even notebooks??

Oh, and I can't stand these animated computer graphics movies for kids. I know real hand drawn animation will never come back and I can't support this crap its just flat out lazy to let a machine realize a design you invented.

Posted by: shoogie at July 27, 2006 11:49 AM

My son who is four requested to go sit in the lobby because it was too scary. The nine & twelve-year-olds loved it.

Posted by: Christine at July 28, 2006 4:54 PM

I liked it a lot, but I'm not so sure about it missing adult innuendo. It didn't have some of the gross-out adult jokes, but it did have lines like "My dad's at the store and my mom's at the movies with her personal trainer," or something to that effect. This is one of the first movies of this kind where I was able to pick out a lot of the voices, which speaks to the consistent level of talent assembled and the intelligent move of casting actors with unique voices--since after all that IS their contribution to the movie, not their looks or physical comedy. As if to underscore this, they had a trailer for that animated movie with Martin Lawrence (more of a physical comedian) voicing one of the characters, and I didn't even know it was him until the end of the trailer.

Posted by: Eep at August 7, 2006 12:09 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time