free counter with statistics Michael Clayton | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

clayton7.jpg

Beautiful Sorta

Michael Clayton / Daniel Carlson

Film Reviews | October 12, 2007 | Comments (26)


Michael Clayton is a thriller devoid of surprises but still crammed with tension. Writer-director Tony Gilroy, who also scripted the Bourne films and the considerably less watchable Armageddon, is fantastic in his first turn as director in mining every bit of his story for emotional nuance and turning what could have been a boilerplate legal drama into a compelling story about frailty, greed, and what it means to realize too late that you’ve gone too far down a dark, bad road. Perhaps the best script from Gilroy’s past that hinted at this kind of story would be his screenplay for The Devil’s Advocate, a cheesy film directed by Taylor Hackford that imagined the devil himself as the head of a law firm. The script wasn’t exactly subtle, but Gilroy’s point was that every organization has on some level been compromised by baser human desires, and his screenplay was a melodramatic representation of the extreme incarnation of that thesis. That’s what’s so gripping about Michael Clayton: Gilroy never pretends for a minute to forge a whodunit from his story, acknowledging up front that the giant law firm is crooked, that their client is covering up a deadly secret, and that this is just the way things are. However, Gilroy’s advanced approach to deconstructing the legal thriller — the revelation of the firm’s implicit corruptibility is the basis of the story, not the summation of it — winds up hindering the film’s efficacy to a certain degree. That’s not to say it’s a bad film; just the opposite. The film is beautifully composed, and Gilroy chews on prose the way few writers do. But Michael Clayton is also a cold film, one to be admired and respected, but never held, and certainly not loved. Michael Clayton is technically accomplished, anchored by another solid performance from George Clooney, but it’s also unequivocally bleak in its portrayal of the soiled human condition. Everyone here is tainted, ruined, and resigned to their damnation.

The film opens with a voice-over: Arthur Edens (Tom Wilkinson), a senior litigator at Kenner Bach & Ledeen, is explaining to his colleague, Michael Clayton (Clooney), that he’s come to an existential realization of the terrible nature of what the firm is and does and just what it means that he, Arthur, has been a part of the firm’s financial rise and moral decline over the past couple decades. But this narration is laid over scenes of the firm’s lawyers frantically working late at night to close a case, which gives way to Michael sitting at a poker table in what appears to be a kind of warehouse/drug den in the basement of a Chinese restaurant. The chronology of Arthur’s epiphany isn’t immediately clear; whether it’s already happened or whether it’s about to or whether it’s a long way off yet is still up in the air. Gilroy has a habit of simply throwing the viewer into the scene, letting relationships and personalities develop from dialogue and body language, and he does the same kind of thing with the opening sequence, which also includes an incongruous shot of Tilda Swinton sitting in a public bathroom and sweating profusely that won’t make contextual sense until the final act. Gilroy only slowly brings things into focus, his manner of gradually informing the audience mirroring Michael’s upcoming descent into greater realization of just what’s been happening in his life.

After the poker game, Michael gets a late-night call saying one of the firm’s clients needs some help with a hit-and-run, so Michael heads from New York up to Westchester to try and fix things. That’s what Michael is: a fixer, the man who does whatever he needs to do to get done what needs to be done, whether it’s squeezing a D.A. to loosen up on a client or calling in favors from the police. The Westchester client prissily says he expects a miracle worker, but Michael plainly says, “I’m not a miracle worker. I’m a janitor.” If he’d brushed off the attempted compliment, or at least acknowledged it, Michael would be a whole different breed of man, someone arrogant and cocksure. But there’s something almost dejected in the way Michael simply says he just shuttles around cleaning up messes, as if he still can’t quite believe this is where his life has ended up, and Clooney conveys all of this with nothing more than the soft gravelly rasp of his voice and the way his face can seem to fold in on itself in moments of remorse and regret. He barely smiles the entire movie; he’s too busy trying to come to grips with who he is.

The problem that Michael spends the film trying to fix is the mental breakdown of Arthur, who strips down to his underwear in the middle of a deposition in Milwaukee and begins to profess his love for one the plaintiffs. Arthur is the one that’s been overseeing the firm’s representation of UNorth, a chemical company being sued by dozens of Midwestern families who claim the conglomerate’s weed-killer compound wound up harming the farmland and poisoning those who came in contact with it. Gilroy’s not stupid enough to attempt to mine something new out of corporate-level eco-terroristic greed; he lays out up front that the firm is crooked, and their client is guilty. In the absence of any viewer-directed tension, Gilroy instead relies on the character interactions and a vague sense of inevitability to carry things through, and this mostly succeeds. But ultimately the film feels episodic and remote, consisting of a series of sequences that are often interdependent but never catching, and all of it two or three layers removed from fully engaging the viewer.

For instance, Arthur flees Milwaukee without Michael, who must then return to New York and attempt to track him down — again — while dealing with an impatient boss (Sydney Pollack) and growing friction with UNorth’s in-house legal counsel, Karen Crowder (Swinton). For a purportedly world-class fixer, Michael seems pretty out of it, both unable to clean up Arthur’s mess and unwilling to cooperate with his own client’s lawyer. Part of this is deliberate on Gilroy’s part: Michael is the hero of the piece by virtue of being the least corrupt, so his reluctance to sell out his old friend and his stubbornness in the face of corporate change are almost good character traits. But too often the film feels as wandering as its protagonist, sliding from scene to scene without much drive but loads of style. Gilroy also packs in a subplot about Michael’s desire to get out of his line of work and open up a restaurant with a brother, though the rough financing has put the water right at his head. Plus there’s Michael’s other brother, Gene (Sean Cullen), a cop whose favors are among the many Michael calls in, and Michael’s son (Austin Williams), and an ex floating around somewhere.

It’s the fantastic cast that actually keeps the entire production afloat, with Clooney leading the pack in a subdued, almost depressed role that has him blend into the background and become unglamorous and stone-faced. Wilkinson and Swinton are amazing, as well. Swinton is cold-blooded but still maintains a shred of humanity that keeps her conflicted about it, and she swings from steely composure to sweaty anxiety with eerie speed. She and Clooney only share a few scenes, but their confrontation at the end is one of the few conversations in the film that jumps with life and humor and rage and the entire terrible range of human emotion. The scene crackled with an energy often lacking from the rest of the film, and it was a reminder of just how aloof the film had managed to be: It’s tough to care for or about the people on screen when they aren’t given enough depth to become real people. It’s a shame Gilroy couldn’t find a way to work more characterization, and not just caricatures, into the script. Wilkinson is fantastic, too, breathing fire and managing to be both believably unhinged and also pathetic for being so washed up. He’s the only one trying to expose the truth about what he knows, and that makes him the film’s biggest sucker.

Early on, as Michael is driving up to Westchester, the GPS in his Mercedes gives out for a moment or two, and though there’s an in-story explanation later given for the glitch, Gilroy’s point is thuddingly clear: Michael doesn’t know where he’s going, but he’s getting there in style. And yet he winds up almost exactly where he started. At one point toward the end, he hails a cab, hands the driver a bill and says, “Give me $50 worth. Just drive.” And he sits there, still going nowhere, but resting easier now that someone else is at the wheel.

Daniel Carlson is the managing editor of Pajiba and a low-level employee at a Hollywood industry magazine. You can visit his blog, Slowly Going Bald.


Good Night, The | We Own the Night



Comments

Great review of a great movie. I enjoyed the film's aloofness, distance, and high style, though I agree it could have been more engaging. Despite that, though, the scenes that *were* particularly engaging crackled with energy (especially the final confrontation). And yes, the casting was superb. Clooney, especially, is pitch-perfect in his role.

I saw this film last weekend at the cinema in Union Square, and I was surprised by its ability to affect the packed house: the packed house would break its silence to burst into laughter together, or gasp, or (in a couple instances), cheer and clap. For all its aloofness, when it gets you, it gets you good.

Posted by: Katie at October 12, 2007 6:44 AM

Ah, crap. Twin instances of "packed house." Whatever, it's early.

Posted by: Katie at October 12, 2007 6:46 AM

its strange, while i was IN the theater i enjoyed it immensely, but no that i reflect upon it there wasnt much to enjoy and if i were to recommend it i wouldnt know what to say. however, i believe the monologue at the begining by arthur is amazing, and sums up MY feelings about big Corporate Firms.

Posted by: sana at October 12, 2007 9:10 AM

"but it's also unequivocally bleak in its portrayal of the soiled human condition. Everyone here is tainted, ruined, and resigned to their damnation."

You and I have obviously never worked at the same large companies because that pretty much sums up the scene at the multinational corporation where I earned a paycheck for one of the worst years of my life.

Posted by: PaddyDog at October 12, 2007 10:30 AM

Yes, I am that hypocritical, corporation-defendin' lawyer who LIVES for these kinds of movies. The work I do is pretty bloodless (though it does involve massive fraud), but I do enjoy watching people fight the good fight.

I'll fight the good fight when I can afford to :).

Posted by: Samantha T at October 12, 2007 10:59 AM

Yes, I am that hypocritical, corporation-defendin' lawyer who LIVES for these kinds of movies. The work I do is pretty bloodless (though it does involve massive fraud), but I do enjoy watching people fight the good fight.

I'll fight the good fight when I can afford to :).

Posted by: Samantha T at October 12, 2007 11:00 AM

You and me both, Sam-T, chalking the days on my office wall until I can open that Golden Retriever ranch and boarding house. I told DR months ago that I was reviewing my options. Maybe George Clooney can knock some sense into me.

Lighter note: Tilda Swinton makes me feel funny in my nethers.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at October 12, 2007 11:06 AM

Yay Ryan Adams reference!!

Posted by: Rachael at October 12, 2007 12:16 PM

If anything, it'll be supremely well acted.

Great review, Dan.

Posted by: Kevin longrie at October 12, 2007 1:20 PM

Samantha T and Socalled: That's exactly it. We're inescapably shackled to these corporations because of mortgages and college loans and whatever else. Nothing pisses me off more than people who ask me why I don't use my talents to work for Oxfam or Save the Whales. These people usually grew up in houses larger than the entire block my house was on and they have generous trust funds lining their safety nets. Once when I did work for a non-profit (and lived with three room mates in a bad part of town), my cube mate would wax on about how great it was to "be doing something for people" while she went home every night to her apartment off Michigan Avenue paid for by Daddy (wanna bet Daddy didn't work for a non-profit?). For the rest of us, I think we divide into 2 camps, those who don't swallow the Kool-Aid and wait it out until the Golden Retriever ranch is a posibility (and escape to Pajiba each day) or those who just become corporate ass-hole yes-men. And the latter is the slimiest species on earth.

Posted by: PaddyDog at October 12, 2007 2:04 PM

Go, PaddyDog, go! Woke up with a bit o' vinegar in the blood, eh? Living in SF, I frequently encounter the sub-species of limousine liberal to which you refer, and they can be obnoxious, as can the blindered sheep and corporate shepherds on the other end of the spectrum. I do run into many genuine, well-intentioned folk who legitimately bypass the consequences of corporate life -- longer hours, less noble goals -- for a more materially meager but ostensibly more fulfilling life. I admire their choices, but there are individual goals worth accomplishing, and that requires playing the game.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at October 12, 2007 2:29 PM

Go into business for yourself, I say. Then, when you DO sell out, it'll be to line your own pockets with 40 pieces instead of some CEO.

Posted by: Kitty X at October 12, 2007 3:57 PM

Socalled: there are many who would say that on this particular topic, I have a little blood in my vinegar!! If I run into one more well-heeled former university friend who gives me the disappointed "aha" when they learn I have a corporate job, I may well have to start a very bloody revolution. Let's see what a judgmental "aha" sounds like while uttered through a mouth stuffed with severed scrota!
(Watches as the entire Pajiba fellowship backs away in horror at the monster PaddyDog has become)

Posted by: PaddyDog at October 12, 2007 4:06 PM

If I run into one more well-heeled former university friend who gives me the disappointed "aha" when they learn I have a corporate job

Hee hee hee, yes, I run into that as well, especially in Northern California -- though it's usually a new acquaintance at some fundraiser who recoils ever-so-slightly upon learning what I do. I find it amusing and always want to ask them who they think pays for the cops and firemen that protect their homes, the roads they drive on, the teachers that teach their kids (though most of their kids are in private school, which I find intriguing), etc., etc. (Hint: It's about 80% from taxes on private, for-profit businesses and their employees.)

Kitty X, that is certainly the plan. I just have to arrange it in a way that doesn't jeopardize Mrs. socalled and Dorko and Dumbo, who are roughly the size of Wookiees (D&D, not Mrs. s) and require significant amounts of kibble and plush toys. That means "a few more years on my back," to paraphrase Jamie Lee Curtis. Thank goodness I enjoy the sex.

And to link this all back to the review: Once I'm in position for my next life, during my last dull, grey court hearing on some mundane procedural matter that does not involve deadly chemicals or young widows, I'm going to strip off my clothes and run around the courtroom, apropos of nothing, shouting, "George Clooney made me do it! Help me baby Jesus! Help me Jewish god! Help me Allah!"

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at October 12, 2007 4:35 PM

I have found my people! In front of a group of people in law school I said "Public interest work is for rich kids." Everybody tittered nervously and I said "Actually, I'm being entirely serious." Not a popular sentiment, apparently. The way I see it, it's a long career - perhaps at some point I can work for the public good in some capacity (the government, maybe?). One thing I won't do, though, is pat myself on the back about all the pro bono work I do drawing on the firm's time/resources. I really hate that shit.

Posted by: Samantha T at October 12, 2007 4:55 PM

"We're inescapably shackled to these corporations because of mortgages and college loans and whatever else."

That honestly reminded me of Thank You For Smoking, a great movie that goes on the same vein, contrary direction. Something along that line was Nick Naylor's weapon of choice. This is not to offend anyone out there, I still think it is a good "excuse".

Posted by: gargumma at October 12, 2007 6:02 PM

Thanks for all the spoilers-I hope you have a horrible Christmas.

Posted by: daniel at October 12, 2007 8:46 PM

You know, I come from a regular family, went to law school, accumulated about $120,000 of debt and have worked public interest jobs since I graduated and have never found that money was a real issue.

I don't buy the whole "I'm too broke to not practice corporate law" line. It's all about lifestyle choices. I have loans and a mortgage just like anyone else but I can make it work on less than $50k a year.

Look, I don't care what people decide to do with their time. If you want to live the soul-sucking existence of a big firm associate, fine. Someone has to do it, I suppose. All I am saying, is that you don't actually need to be making the kind of money that those places pay to live a decent life.

IMO, it is pretty delusional to tell yourself otherwise.

Posted by: Kate at October 15, 2007 8:11 AM

Kate, that was pretty harsh. Not to mention, your statements don't factor in a number of things... where do you live? What's the cost of living like? I'd say it's a lot easier to hold down a 50K a year job if you live in a less expensive part of the country where you bought your house for 150K (or less), as opposed to living in NYC or Boston or somewhere like that, where the cost of living is exorbitant and housing prices are through the roof. It's easy to judge people when you don't know their personal circumstances... and this is coming from someone who DOES work for the public interest. I'm just saying, there are more factors at play than your sweeping, judgmental statements took into consideration.

I can't believe I'm sticking up for corporate attorneys. I need a shower.

Posted by: TK at October 15, 2007 11:43 AM

If I run into one more well-heeled former university friend who gives me the disappointed "aha" when they learn I have a corporate job

Oh holy yes, PaddyDog. I have buckets of sympathy for you. Whenever I go back to my hometown I'm surrouned by well meaning friends who've graduated with "worthwhile" degrees, working for charities or "wating to do something that matters" (ie. "being a jobless layabout") still living with, and funded by, Mummy and Daddy. And then I get looked down upon for taking the first, maybe "unworthy", job I could find so that I could pay my sky-high rent and put food on my table. Ah the cost of being a grownup. And we're talking entry level stuff here, it's not even like I've sold my soul to a major corporation - I work for a University for God's sake.

Wow, didn't know I had quite such a big sore spot regarding that particular issue.

*ahem* anyway... carry on.

Posted by: Alex the Odd at October 15, 2007 12:02 PM

TK - I wasn't meaning to be harsh I just wanted to point out that most people don't get paid nearly as much as corporate attorneys and yet they still seem to manage to get by.

I'm not trying to critique anyone's career choices and personally I don't see anything all that wrong with going the corporate route, but to claim that working in the public interest sector is a financial impossibility just seems a little disingenuous to me. If you really wanted to do it, you could.

And I live in Chicago, which isn't exactly low cost living. Not to mention, it's a good location for me to sharpen my skills as a moonlighting panhandler - gotta make those ends meet.

Posted by: Kate at October 15, 2007 6:19 PM

Personally, I enjoy any movie with a Plato reference in it, you don't get too many of those these days. I'm suprised no one has caught on here yet? I thought much more highly of you Pajibaians.

Posted by: Laura at October 16, 2007 1:15 AM

Kate: Fair enough. Thanks for clearing that up, and here's a quarter and a sandwich. Please don't spend it on booze or crack.

:)

Posted by: TK at October 16, 2007 10:36 AM

I truly appreciate people who keep it real and do public interest work because they're committed to it, debt be damned. I don't have that kind of fortitude. I, personally, quite literally could not make $50K with my present situation what with childcare, loans, am of advanced age, etc., but I do tip my hat to those who live on a shoestring to help others.

With that said, the biggest offenders of the condescending "Oh, you've sold out" variety are those with income coming from another source (husband, family, etc.) and can afford to be the secondary income. Now *that* frosts my ass.

Posted by: Samantha T at October 16, 2007 12:44 PM

Another in the long line of crappy Clooney movies whose purpose is to espouse a lame liberal point of view. Obviously, for the many millions of us who take pleasure in working and achieving goals, the movie had no "real" plot and everything was force-fed to us. This movie is only meant for the loser lemmings that cry foul from other people as opposed to taking the blame on themselves for their miserable lives.

Posted by: RealMan at January 22, 2008 11:06 AM

I feel like I'm taking stupid pills here... has there been any movie in which George Clooney has contributed anything to the art of screen acting besides his accent in "O Brother, Where Art Thou?" Imagine my surprise when I discovered Clooney was up for awards consideration for this film. Was no one paying attention to Tom Wilkinson or Tilda Swinton? Fuck me running, Sydney Pollack did more acting in his introductory scene than Clooney managed throughout the entire film. "Michael Clayton" was a waste of my life, and the most frustrating part is that I'll never get those two hours back.



Ah, bollocks. I'm going to move to Hollywood and become a star on the new style of method acting: "go by a different name, glare intently at things, and speak in an overly terse tone".

Posted by: Max at March 2, 2008 4:21 PM