web
counter
 

It’s Not the Size of the Noggin but the Motion of the Notion that Matters

By Agent Bedhead | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (14)



megamind1sm.jpg

DreamWorks famously committed to releasing a record three films in 2010 and has gone on to do so with mixed results. Katzenberg & Co. started out strong with How to Train Your Dragon but regressed to autopilot with Shrek Forever After and just flat ran out of steam with this latest project, which isn’t a revolting film by any means but isn’t exactly deserving of praise either. Much like Universal’s recent addition to the 3D-animation antihero game, Despicable Me, Megamind presents audiences with a supervillain undergoing an identity crisis. The movie also relies heavily upon the D.C. Comics stash of character archetypes; it does so primarily by performing a twist on the Superman/Lex Luthor dichotomy and gratuitously tossing in a bunch Green Lantern references. The result is not nearly as clever as director Tom McGrath (Madagascar) and a couple of inexperienced screenwriters (Alan Schoolcraft and Brent Simons) would have us believe, but I’ve got no doubt that audiences will nonetheless reward the minimal efforts coming from these filmmakers.

Now, I’ll concede that Megamind’s visuals are rather impressive and actually make good use of 3D effects, but this eye candy is just that. The script is crafted around a list of 3D effects with little afterthought given to providing a story worth telling. Megamind, like Shrek, appears to revolve around the assumption that there really are no more stories worth telling that haven’t already been told; as such, this movie subsists upon aping superior tales of yesteryear with all of the overwrought self-awareness of writers who just recently learned the meaning of “meta” (but haven’t watched nearly enough contemporary movies to realize that the tactic has already been done to death). This cinematically juvenile approach wouldn’t be such a problem if Megamind didn’t also have much in common with the aforementioned Despicable Me (which emerged earlier this year as a startlingly original property); but since I’m feeling rather generous today, not even those similarities would necessarily damn Megamind either but for the fact that Despicable did it all — visuals, voicing, and script — far better in terms of the super-villain turned antihero.

Megamind unoriginally riffs upon the superhero and supervillain archetypes under the flimsy excuse of offering “commentary.” The problem, of course, is that no new thoughts are expressed by the terribly insubstantial script, so Megamind ends up being an impossibly inferior product, which has been mass-marketed and shoveled into theaters upon the backs of a bunch of A-list voices. That’s supposed to be adequate to pull you into theaters. Well, it’s not enough, dammit.

Working with an exceedingly simple story, Megamind tells the tale of good vs. evil in Metro City. Many years ago, two infants — Metro Man (Brad Pitt) and Megamind (Will Ferrell) — simultaneously left their own planets in capsules bound for Earth. One of them lands, relatively speaking, in the lap of luxury; the other one somehow lands inside of a prison. I think you can guess how well this plays out for the blue, light bulb-shaped cranium, correct? Megamind is “Bad to the Bone” (a merciless tune already shamelessly regurgitated within this year’s Cats & Dogs: The Revenge of Kitty Galore) from the very beginning of life on Earth. From that point on, Metro Man and Megamind find themselves ensnared within a rivalry of the ages until one of their battles inexplicably results in the death of Metro Man. Afterwards, Megamind finds himself, quite simply, incapable of coping without his former nemesis to keep him hopping.

Much like Despicable’s Gru, Megamind soon grows disenchanted with the fruits of villainy; but instead of deciding that there’s much more to life (i.e., family) than being the biggest, baddest villain of them all, Megamind decides to place himself back at square one. So he summons his most loyal servant, who just happens to be named Minion (David Cross, an entirely lost cause at this point), to conjure up a new and improved mortal enemy on the good side. Naturally, the plan doesn’t work out as anticipated; even more predictably, Megamind develops a love interest in Roxanne Ritchi, (Tina Fey) the prototypical ace television reporter in manner of Lois Lane. For her part, Fey is scrappy, while Jonah Hill is goofy as Roxanne’s cameraman, Hal, who very unsubtly recalls a few Green Lantern incarnations. The enduring appeal of Brad Pitt shines through in his voice work, but his role is fairly limited. Meanwhile, Ferrell briefly does a Marlon Brando-esque voice reminiscient of Jor-El but, otherwise, sounds like someone squarely kicked him in the blue balls. Perhaps someone really should do just that, so that Ferrell can join Megamind in ultimately crumbling underneath the weight of their own jointly presumed cleverness.

Even with all of the underwhelming aspects of Megamind to consider, this movie will likely be the third commercial success this year for DreamWorks. So next time you find yourselves sputtering mad over the cultural perversity of The Twilight Saga and its ability to rake in billions of sparkle-tainted dollars, an even more culpable target for lowering the standards of cinema can be found merely by looking at kiddie flicks, which undoubtedly kick starts bad taste in movies. In other words, these kids learn at an early age to value that which looks really good but offers nothing else; and they seek out similar pretty packages in adolescence. Attempting to counteract these cultural assaults is nothing new to world-weary parents, but for those who choose to remain blissfully ignorant, please rest assured that your time may soon come. Just like those who smugly sit back and think, “MY child won’t have tantrums,” you might also believe that “MY child will have taste.” Well, you’re wrong, and you too will suffer at the hands of flashy and entirely vacuous crap similar to Megamind. Think of it as a rite of parental passage but, if at all possible, attempt to postpone the inevitable until the DVD arrives.

Agent Bedhead lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She and her little black heart can be found at agentbedhead.com.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Pajiba Love 08/11/2010 | MEGA-SHARK LIVES ON! | Ethics vs. Politics: The Keith Olbermann Question | Pajiba Debates









Comments

Huh. I saw this yesterday and thought it was a lot of fun.

Posted by: Even Stevens at November 8, 2010 1:08 PM

Even Stevens,

What part of black little heart do you not understand? Bedhead warns you right up front that she is dead inside and no amount of 3D zoomfoolery is going to change that. She scoffs at your warm heart and love of *wretch* fun.

Posted by: Kballs at November 8, 2010 1:20 PM

This is true... I am used to the black hearts around here, I generally have a shriveled, cold nothingness myself. I don't know why I thought this would be different.

Posted by: Even Stevens at November 8, 2010 1:34 PM

Blah, blah, blah...shut up. It was funny and cute. It was a good movie.

Best quote - "I...I feel cold...and warm and light and dark."

Posted by: Littlejon2001 at November 8, 2010 1:41 PM

Saw it this weekend with the family, they loved it and a good time was had by all. I gave it a B+, it loses the a letter grade for "Bad to the Bone", which is fighting with "I Feel Good" in a constant battle to be the most overused, unoriginal, thoughtless, stupid song you can put on a soundtrack. I liked the movie, I thought Ferrell did a good job carrying the movie. I could have done with a bit more of Metroman, Brad Pitt only has about 10 lines in the entire movie, but it was a good movie. The 3d looked a million times better than HTTYD. Which I enjoyed as well.

Other than BTTB, the music wasn't terrible. The Guns and Roses song at the end was so badass, laser lights and everything; my boys LOVED that part.

Considering we spent $60 bucks on the trip, that we all thought that it was a good time and that the money was well spent speaks volumes. Worth it.

Also the pop-culture references were well done, love you Bedhead, but I wish you had liked this more :(

Posted by: Mebe at November 8, 2010 1:44 PM

So, if we haven't seen Despicable Me yet, then this will be pretty good?

Posted by: Paultera at November 8, 2010 1:55 PM

I agree that it wasn't as good as Despicable Me, but I liked Megamind a great deal. Comparing it to Shrek seemed a bit unfair. It managed to avoid all the fart jokes and other body humor that seem to distinguish the Shrek movies. There were a few pop-culture references, but they weren't off-putting or overly important to the story. I also admit to enjoying the GnR at the end. It was a nice nod to our generation's collective misspent youth.

Posted by: idgiepug at November 8, 2010 2:00 PM

Megamind is the Brainiac/Superman battle, in a cartoonish form, that we will most likely (and unfortunately) never get to see in live action, on the big screen.

Posted by: Taylor Kozakar at November 8, 2010 2:22 PM

What I get out of this review is that if I haven't seen Despicable Me then I will enjoy this film. Is that about correct?

Or should I just go watch Despicable Me instead?

Posted by: Sean at November 8, 2010 3:01 PM

I watched "Megamind" this weekend, and since it's the sort of thing I'm predisposed to like I did...but also felt something was missing.

Made the comment earlier that if the book "Soon I Will Be Invincible" would've had a sense of humor, it probably would've been a lot like "Megamind"...but because "Invincible" came out before I've already read that story, which is why "Megamind" felt a bit stale. That and I've been enjoying the comic series "Irredeemable", a well written take on "Superman gone bad", which made the idea of Titan (Tighten?) as "unstoppable superjerk" seem a little...yeah, stale.

'Course I'm a fan of pretty much all of the voice talent, even thought Brad Pitt did a GREAT job as Metro Man, so that saved a lot of it for me.

Finally, I'm not sure what Bedhead was on about, because aside from Tighten's name being Hal, I hit upon no other Green Lantern references in the movie. Y'all know I would've noticed them if they were there.

I love you, Random Citizen. See you around Metrocity.

Posted by: Green Lantern at November 8, 2010 3:54 PM

Take the dreariest, dullest, most self-indulgent, overbaked review you could ever imagine and multiply that ... by six!

Posted by: Ollo at November 8, 2010 9:26 PM

It wasn't great, but this review makes it sound much worse than it was. And the ultimate "hero moment" was actually kind of clever.

As far as GL references, I think Megamind looks at Hal at some point and says, "You'll do." But that would be a reference to Kyle Rayner not Hal Jordan. (GEEEEEEEEEEEK)

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at November 9, 2010 6:18 AM

Fun movie - The comparisons with Despicable Me aren't even valid. It's like reviewers are grasping for a theme, see two Evil Geniuses, and say that the apple and the orange are the SAME because they're both fruit from trees. *bangs head*

Solid B. I didn't care for the femme in distress (even if it was Fey), Will Ferrell was still Will Ferrell but at least entertainingly so (and the Brando was fan-fucking-tastic), Brad Pitt was gloriously understated, and Jonah Hill . . Jonah's a one-trick pony but he's landing the same trick roles, so I guess he's not a disservice. It's not original, it leans on Ferrell's propensity for over-the-top dramatic moments and entrances, but it executes the themes well and not out of the character of the movie - because why be evil if you can't do it with Style?!

Posted by: idiosynchronic at November 9, 2010 12:16 PM

I took my son to this movie a few days ago and the feminist in me was acting up so much that I couldn't enjoy it.

The movie itself was your average kid's movie - somewhat funny but lacking real wit and very predictable. My big problem with this movie was the female lead (actually the only female role in the entire movie).

I was disappointed several times as it actually seemed like they were setting the scene for Roxanne to get powers or to somehow save the day. But nothing ever came of it. There were three "supers" in this movie - all male. Roxanne, though not your typical damsel in distress, was nothing more than a cheerleader for various male characters. I do appreciate that she was written as being less helpless than "girlfriend-to-the-superhero" characters usually are. But seriously, couldn't they have had her do SOMETHING heroic? In one scene, Roxanne is shown running up behind Titan with a pole in her hands to hit him before he can hurt Megamind... seconds later, she drops it and runs in the opposite direction without doing anything. WHY?

A big part of my disappointment in this movie was that I am a huge fan of Tina Fey. I thought she had more feminist pride than this. In my opinion, this was a relatively unisex movie - that is, it wasn't Barbie and it wasn't Transformers. It wasn't preferentially directed to one gender over the other. Roughly 50% of the target audience is female. With that in mind, why doesn't Roxanne get to be a hero too? I don't get it. I just thought that after the success of a fantastic kid's superhero movie like Monsters vs. Aliens, which I felt had a strong, positive feminist message, kid's movies might start to get a little less sexist.

Posted by: Feminista at November 10, 2010 1:13 PM