free counter with statistics Material Girls | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

materialgirls.jpg
Lifestyles of the Vapid and Superficial

Material Girls / Kerry Benton

Film Reviews | August 18, 2006 | Comments (27)


I was tempted to claim here that I am incapable of imagining the target demographic for this movie. It would make me feel better, truly, to look out upon the vast sea of humanity and find no eye gazing at this (now metaphorical) screen. Sadly, however, I reckon I’ve got a pretty good fix on the image-obsessed, scary-thin, insufficiently clad, reality-TV-drone tweenie set at which this dreck is aimed.

The plot, such as it is, follows sisters Ava (Haylie Duff) and Tanzania Marchetta (Hilary Duff, and no, I shit you not on the name), who stand to inherit their deceased father’s cosmetics company and all the attendant fortune. That the characters hew closely to certain expectations we’ve all crafted from Internet gossips and tabloid obsessives — high fashion, glamorous parties, matching bejewelled SideKicks — is so obvious that I hate to point it out, but there it is. There’s really not a great deal more there; there are some half-hearted attempts to humanize and round out the sisters, but such efforts end up feeling more confusing than defining.

In the midst of a tribute party for their father, a TV news expose claims that Marchetta cosmetics have caused horrifying skin disorders that the company has covered up or some such. Anyway, quite literally overnight Ava and Tanzie find themselves disgraced, homeless and — due to some barely credible credit-card contrivance — penniless. Of course, they’re not actually poor. All they have to do is sell the company to arch-rival Fabiella (Anjelica Huston) and each of them nets $60 million. That even the notion of poverty is applied to these two is preposterous and offensive, but somehow ends up being the implied drive for the remainder of the movie. A remainder that is, of course, exceedingly predictable, as the duo try to clear their father’s good name, save the company, and get back to being rich again. They’re joined, sort of, by company CEO Tommy (Brent Spiner, who actually does make a direct Star Trek reference that I imagine still won’t resonate with most of the audience) and a pair of lower-class love interests, one of whom is played by a bored-looking Lukas Haas. I’m fairly certain even the 6-year-old in the back row knew who the “villain” was going to end up being within the first 20 minutes, but when the worst case scenario ends with the protagonists as, um, still exceedingly wealthy, it’s hard to really care anyway.

Ultimately, the film itself ends up being a kind of meta-representation of the culture it depicts. It’s the thinnest possible story trying to support a cast full of marionettes instead of characters with dimension. Essentially every joke is a throwaway, low-hanging fruit — Tanzie donates her old Dolce & Gabbana to the homeless, Tara Reid and Fred Durst are implicated in Spice Girls karaoke, etc., ad nauseum. And, oh, before I forget, hardly a scene goes by in which someone doesn’t use some sort of hopelessly outmoded slang. I think the writers were trying to be cute, but, really, having the black CFO refer to the girls’ inheritance as “cheddar?” Guys. Really? And dear sweet baby Jesus, don’t get me started on “chillax.” It’s not even funny in a self-referentially lame way. I admit, I did laugh once and, while it may have just been because I needed so very badly to feel some kind of emotion at all, I can’t deny that the shifty hillbilly-type guy threatening to set his neighbor’s cat on fire was pretty funny. I’m just a sucker for jokes about setting stuff on fire, I guess.

It may well be impossible to effectively satirize the Starlet/Heiress axis of superficiality. The whole business would appear to me — and, I hope, to most non-idiots — to be absurd on its face. When the reality is already so purposefully, unabashedly, conspicuously over-the-top shallow, what tools are left to the satirist? Such a send-up would be wonderful, but this movie certainly isn’t it. It’s just another insipid, uninspired advertisement for a lucrative brand. In fact, following the show, a theatre employee handed me a sampler package of perfume with the Hilary Duff trademark (quite literally) scrawled across the bottom. I don’t believe I could possibly have concocted a more appropriate conclusion.

Kerry Benton is a film critic for Pajiba. You can see him in action as “k” on The Supernicety.


I Am a Golden Pajiba! | Accepted



Comments

I wonder what it feels like to be famous, in Haylie's case, for no reason.

Though I guess that's becoming more common these days (i.e. two real life heiresses).

Posted by: Kevin at August 19, 2006 5:13 AM

I must admit, I really would like to see these two sisters make out with each other. Maybe in the sequel.

Posted by: Joey at August 19, 2006 12:53 PM

I have no intention of seeing this movie ever.


But I am a trekkie, so would anyone mind sharing the reference?

Posted by: anaxa at August 19, 2006 1:03 PM

Can I just say, for my ego's sake, that I am a teen girl of the demographic apparently "aimed for" in this movie, and I wouldn't see it under threat of bodily harm?

Posted by: ~Moi~ at August 19, 2006 2:22 PM

I am disowning anyone who goes to see this movie with good intentions. It's not like being forced to watch the stale, corny, wanna-be family comedy "RV" was good, but this, this is just unacceptable. Why was this movie made, again? An unsucessful attempt to gain the Duff sisters more popularity? Fuck them. Especially the older one. Riding the coattails of her younger sister, managing to be even more ugly and snoody. The target audience of this film should be lit on fire.

Posted by: d at August 19, 2006 2:50 PM

What is today's coatail-riding is tomorrow's breadwinning. It won't be long before Hilary has a giant flameout with her grandpappy-lover, her family unofficially disowns her, half of Haylie's face magically falls off, making her slightly less equine-looking, and she'll be instructing young girls on how to love themselves. Love themselves through filial identity-theft.

But that has nothing to do with the film, so I've proved once again I'm a mean-spirited little wench. Meh, Turn, Turn, Turn.

Posted by: M at August 19, 2006 4:48 PM

Author's Note: anaxa : Alas, it was predictably shallow... at the offices of Fabiella, these great big automatic doors open with a hiss and Brent's character says "Whoa, beam me up!"

It's not that the reference is obtuse, but that I'm not sure how many early-to-mid teenaged girls (or boys for that matter) know who Data is.

Posted by: k at August 19, 2006 5:12 PM

i`m with joey , they should be making out or some at least some light petting!!

Posted by: pasadenamike at August 19, 2006 7:10 PM

Thanks, K.


Damn! I was hoping that the bastard screenwriters could at least be good for something!

Posted by: anaxa at August 19, 2006 8:24 PM

Why the hell would Anjelica Houston be a part of this awful thing? It was bad enough that she was in Daddy Day Care

Posted by: Adria at August 20, 2006 12:31 PM

I have to convince my 11 year old daughter she does not need to see this. She was already quoting stuff from the trailer this morning.

God help me. I refuse to spend a penny on this piece of tripe.

Posted by: Kathy at August 20, 2006 6:39 PM

Wow - I named a character on The Sims Tanzania several months ago because I wanted something completely random and ridiculous. I guess that qualifies me to write a Duff sisters movie now!

Posted by: Lortra at August 21, 2006 12:42 AM

Is it me, or did Bette Midler and Lily Tomlin make this same movie eons ago? I think it was equally awful then but at least had two leads who had earned the right to have their names attached to the word "career".

Posted by: Siobhan at August 21, 2006 11:17 AM

I think this is aimed at the Tweens, not so much Teens. A ten-year old would find this entertaining, whereas a 16-year old is next door watching those Motherf***ing Snakes on that Motherf***ing plane.

Posted by: courtney at August 21, 2006 12:29 PM

Why? Why did the Duff sisters even bother with making movies when you can clearly see that the Olsen twins can't even make a decent movie either? And it's about nothing really, about being rich and losing it all and being poor for like 5 seconds...it's just insulting to everyone's intelligence...

Posted by: Gina at August 21, 2006 3:32 PM

Being in the "TEEN" age demographic the movie was geared towards, I couldn't help but dry heave when I heard the saddening news of another Hilary Duff monstrosity heading to theaters. I saw the trailer and I literally cried out in pain. But no, it wasn't over, Haylie-Horse-Face had to be in the "movie" as well. Were the writers on something when the made Hil's name TANZANIA?? WHAT THE HELL???? Its demeaning for all teens to be thought of as owning a circa-2004 sworovski crystalized Sidekick, they really need to stop doing that, its just sick. Ew, I think I have to puke from just the thought of "material girls"... *runs to bathroom*.

Posted by: Ellie at August 22, 2006 6:14 PM

Please, please tell me the scene was delected when Tanzania found herself in close quarters with an extremely butch-looking cell-mate who received a makeover utilizing cosmetics composed of--wait for it--toe jam and *jesus* I can't even remember the other shit they used!!!!

Saw this gem last summer as part of a test audience!

Posted by: wildrose at August 22, 2006 9:20 PM

delected=deleted!

Posted by: wildrose at August 22, 2006 9:22 PM

Author's Note: wildrose: no. no it wasn't. it was just as asinine and offensive as you recall.

adria: I had the same inital impression, but soon realized that there are actually quite a number of questionable choices in A.H.'s past, sadly.

various: A bit of Hilary on Haylie make-out action might have helped, if only for the fact that I might have missed a few minutes of stilted dialogue and unfunny "jokes" while my brain parsed the implications of on-screen incest in a film with this rating. I sincerely doubt, however, that it'd be much of a turn on.

Posted by: k at August 23, 2006 1:03 PM

As part of the teen age group this movie may have been targeted at, I can't believe that anyone not some Lizzie McGuire-obsessed tween girl would go see this. What kind of producer agrees to make these films for her? She's crap and so is any story she's in.

Posted by: Camille at August 24, 2006 7:51 PM

Haylie Duff famous for no reason? Come on, man, she was in Napoleon Dynamite!
(Satirizing the very kind of snobby superpopular queen-bee alpha female she has now become...oh, it's a wonderful life, isn't it?)

Posted by: Peter at August 24, 2006 11:09 PM

oooh wow.
another movie with hilary duff
Haylie is been a sponge suckin all the fame-
and for what?

Posted by: black_huddy@hotmail.com at August 25, 2006 12:55 AM

This isn't really surprising. Hollywood has been pumping out this garbage for decades. We always call it garbage and they just keep on making it. I just always assumed that they new it was shit and that they were just fullfilling some contract promise and that they new they would end up eating it in the end, but their "star" would be happy because she got that 2 picture deal and would agree to keep spinning out the middle school music for there company where they would make up the difference, and then some, on said middle schoolers.

Duff is just another one of those shallow, oblivious, hyper-sheltered, forced conservative Disney chicks that dont make a dime after 21. They have no clue what they are doing. They just blindly follow the "trail of fame" right into a brick wall.

Just let your manager "handle it". He knows exactly what hes doing. Cha-Ching.

Posted by: Erik at August 30, 2006 10:11 PM

Whatever happened to the natural, unmaked over Disney Hillary Duff? New teeth and heavy makeup have just neutralized her charm. Hillary get rid of your entourage and agent.

Roseabel

Posted by: Rose Adler at September 4, 2006 3:59 PM

shut up everyone! that film was good. you in case you havnt noticed, are adults. you would hardly enjoy a kids film. anyone who is NOT stupid would know that. you are so stupid!

Posted by: shauna at October 21, 2006 11:04 AM

My roommate is watching this as I type. Ergo, I've been subjected to the dreadful sound of the Duffs and this pitiful (not to mention suprisingly offensive) "plot" for the past hour.

I had no choice but to consult Pajiba for emotional support. THANK YOU.

Posted by: Lindsay at January 12, 2007 9:17 PM

"shut up everyone! that film was good. you in case you havnt noticed, are adults. you would hardly enjoy a kids film. anyone who is NOT stupid would know that. you are so stupid!"

There are so mant things wrong with this post.
You're generalising too much, i can assure you that not all teenagers want to see this movie, i'm 15 and i would rather die 3000 painful deaths that see it. and there were 2 other people who said they were in the target age group who refuse to see it too.
So think before you speak or else everyone will consider you the stupid one instead.

Posted by: Cassie at January 23, 2007 12:17 AM