free counter with statistics Martian Child | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

john_cusack4.jpg

K-SUX

Martian Child / Dustin Rowles

Film Reviews | November 2, 2007 | Comments (36)


So, let’s say that instead of this, Lloyd Dobler and Diane Court survived some tough times in college, a time that fostered a lot of introspection for Lloyd, and he decided — during that period — to become a science-fiction writer. He and Diane married, chilled out considerably, and lived a very modest, humble life together for 15 or 20 years, and then Diane passed away of unknown causes. Lloyd grieved for a couple of years, sought comfort from his sarcastic, over-protective sister (still played by Joan Cusack), and then decided on a whim to adopt a child. Not just any child, however; a psychologically damaged child, abandoned so often by foster parents that he’d developed a troubling dissociative disorder that made him believe he was from the planet Mars. Fortunately for Lloyd, as the famous author of a Harry Potter like sci-fi novel, he knew a little something about fictional alien life, so the two wounded souls become an uncommonly good match for one another.

And that’s about what Martian Child amounts to; a sweet, sometimes cute film that outlasts its premise by a good 75 minutes or so, but thanks to the presence of Lloyd … ahem, John Cusack, it’s not a terribly obnoxious film. Just kind of cloying and blah. A decent rainy day film if your Netflix queue inexplicably goes dry. Or, for Cusack completists, two hours that you probably won’t mind losing for the greater Cusackian cause.

But, back to that plot: After David (Cusack) takes Dennis (Bobby Coleman) back to his house, he tries his damndest to mainstream Dennis into, well, earthling life. Dennis, who prefers living in an Amazon.com box during the day, eventually weans himself out with UV block and sunglasses, eats Lucky Charms exclusively, and wears a gravity belt made of Duracell batteries to keep him from floating away (if anything, Martian Child is tailor-made for product placement). David, initially, is patient and understanding, succumbing to Dennis’ fantasy life in the hopes that if he can gain Dennis’ trust, he can pull him slowly into reality.

And that’s really where the premise goes awry. The kid is annoying as hell — not the actor, per se; just the character, who sticks with that Martian Asperger’s long after the gimmickry stops being cute. At a certain point about twenty minutes in, Dennis completely loses his adorable-kid appeal, and you just want to pick up the little guy up, throttle him, and say, “Stop it. Stop hanging upside down from trees. Stop stealing your classmates’ shoes. Take off those goddamn sunglasses, and stop doing that thing with your fingers before I break one!” (Please do not call social services on me). Credit Cusack for making it tolerable to sit through, and for selling the hokum with a certain amount of blasé charm.

In fact, Cusack is the sole bright spot in Martian Child, aging gracefully into the father role, and becoming exactly the sort of Dad that Say Anything portended: A patient, affectionate Poppa who toes the line between friend and father-figure exceptionally well and who, even when he loses his temper, nicely expresses his love through anger. It’s just that Martian Child is a terrible vehicle for those talents. It’s got all the painfully banal formula touchstones: cute kid, dead dog, repeating motifs, and a big, climactic waterworks-inducing speech. It’s a bit like having intercourse with a guy, I suppose: You don’t have to put a lot of effort into it to get the expected result, but that doesn’t mean it’s a particularly enjoyable experience. Likewise, Martian Child is a movie you may will yourself not to hate out of respect for Cusack, but if you’re not one of his slavering admirers (as I am), you’ll likely loathe Martian Child for all the right reasons: It’s nauseatingly sentimental, seemingly scripted by General Mills and Kleenex, and gallingly predictable. Fortunately, in a month’s time, Grace is Gone will arrive in theaters and, thanks to one of the best lead performances from an actor all year, Martian Child will be all but forgotten.

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. He lives with his wife and son in Ithaca, New York. You may email him, or leave a comment below.


Angus | Bee Movie, The



Comments

Bummer. I really was really looking forward to this, but it isn't getting the best reviews. At least I will know that going in and won't be too disappointed.

Posted by: jadeblue at November 2, 2007 4:25 PM

Deep down, even though I wanted this to be good, I knew this was going to be the outcome.

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at November 2, 2007 4:28 PM

I heart pajiba and check it every day, but can you guys write one freakin' thing about John Cusack without calling him Lloyd Dobler?

it's getting older than the 2-year-old babybels in my crisper

get over the Say Anything obsession, puhleeze

if i see "Loyd Dobler" on this site one more time i just may get really angry and stuff myself with lolcats

Posted by: Plobes at November 2, 2007 4:37 PM

My love for John Cusack covers a multitude of suck.

Posted by: Kermit at November 2, 2007 4:42 PM

Sex with a guy: "You don't have to put a lot of effort into it to get the expected result, but that doesn't mean it's a particularly enjoyable experience."

AHAHAHAHAHAHA

It's like a glass-half-empty version of "Sex is like pizza. Even when it's bad, it's still pretty good."

Oi, you've made my day.

Posted by: Stella at November 2, 2007 4:45 PM

"A patient, affectionate Poppa who toes the line between friend and father-figure . . ."

You put your right toe in, you take you right toe out, you put your right toe in and you toes it all about.

I think you mean "tows the line." Gotta love spell check.

Posted by: BWeaves at November 2, 2007 4:46 PM

I always thought it was "toes", you know, like stading firmly on a line, with no deviation?

Posted by: pinkcheese at November 2, 2007 4:52 PM

Erm, standing, rather.

Posted by: pinkcheese at November 2, 2007 4:53 PM

that's like my friend who thought the phrase was "something peaked her interest" not "piqued"...

Posted by: Stella at November 2, 2007 5:02 PM

Pinkcheese is right (as was Dustin), "toe" is correct.

Posted by: Pedant#3 at November 2, 2007 5:04 PM

Wait, I thought K-PAX was K-SUX?

In deference to Plobes, I will henceforth refer to Cusack as "Lane Meyer."

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at November 2, 2007 5:19 PM

"It's a bit like having intercourse with a guy, I suppose: You don't have to put a lot of effort into it to get the expected result, but that doesn't mean it's a particularly enjoyable experience."

gotta love it. Great review.

Posted by: lively at November 2, 2007 5:27 PM

My love for John Cusack covers a multitude of suck.

Posted by: Kermit at November 2, 2007 4:42 PM

************************************************

Oy...you said it.

*long sigh*

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at November 2, 2007 5:34 PM

I have always loved The Cus and then I moved to Chicago and found out he is second only to The Piven in Douchebaggeriness.

It was a sad, sad day.

He's still purty to look at and listen to (on script that is)

Posted by: ILiveInChicagoNow at November 2, 2007 5:36 PM

Oh and, I wonder if John would mind if I asked out Beth?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at November 2, 2007 5:36 PM

I stand corrected.

Thanks

Posted by: Bweaves at November 2, 2007 5:50 PM

socalledonlycousins,


that's brilliant. i like better off dead soooo much better than say anything, and its not referenced very often.
but what's up with Cusack playing characters with one-syllable L first names and two syllable last names?

Lloyd Dobler
Lane Meyer

Posted by: Plobes at November 2, 2007 6:22 PM

add to last post: two syllable last names ending in ER???


my friday night commenting nerdosity endz hear!!!

Posted by: Plobes at November 2, 2007 6:24 PM

I was actually considering going to see it despite your (and other reviews) until you mentioned dead dog. wsapnin can't handle dead dogs. Dead parents, yes, Dead dogs, no. I'm just twisted in that way.

Posted by: wsapnin at November 2, 2007 6:24 PM

add to last post: two syllable last names ending in ER???


my friday night commenting nerdosity endz hear!!!

Posted by: Plobes at November 2, 2007 6:24 PM

Just the ads for this movie made my ovaries twitch a little, so this definitely looks like a rental where I can "girl" all over the place in the privacy of my own home.

Sorry, but Cusack as cute daddy=Sunday morning chick-flick bliss.

Posted by: heatdamaged at November 2, 2007 7:00 PM

I have heard disturbing reports that John Cusak is (sigh) a douche bag. My teenage love of Say Anything and Better Off Dead made him a favourite until I heard he actually hates being asked about BOD and actually says he doesn't remember that movie - WTF. Though Grosse Point Blank did redeem him somewhat in my eyes and 1408 was not too bad - I'm trying to forget Must Love Dogs and Serendipity. I wanted to like this movie too but when the trailer made me tear up I kinda got the Pay It Forward panic - You Must Cry Now ending feeling. I will probably see this some rainy Sunday but probably not in the theatre.
Thanks for the great review.

Posted by: Popsi_zen at November 2, 2007 7:00 PM

God, what is it with annoying teen and child characters in movies? All I could think about during Dan in Real Life was how much I wanted to backhand that slut daughter. (When I wasn't thinking how blah the entire film was.)

It just totally kills the premise, because no parent could ever love a child as annoying as that. Thanks for the heads-up.

Posted by: Gudrun at November 2, 2007 7:15 PM

It's a bit like having intercourse with a guy, I suppose: You don't have to put a lot of effort into it to get the expected result, but that doesn't mean it's a particularly enjoyable experience.

Jeez, Dustin, I know you're married, so you don't have to worry about the big, bad dating pool anymore, but try not to demotivate the women of the world from sleeping with us, o.k.?

I promise I'll aspire to make it at least a "particularly enjoyable experience" for whatever woman deigns to sleep with me!

Posted by: Darth Corleone at November 2, 2007 8:14 PM

Darth - look at it this way: he's not poisoning the dating pool; he's just lowering expectations. All the easier to make the experience particularly enjoyable when that woman comes knocking.

Posted by: Tiki at November 2, 2007 9:02 PM

Tiki>> I'll just hope expectations aren't lowered so far that women don't even bother.

Of course, the concept of lowering expectations so as to enable a pleasant surprise is straight out of Say Anything's script. :- )

Posted by: Darth Corleone at November 2, 2007 9:07 PM

Darth- I think he meant having sex with a guy if you're a straight man. Which would make it an understandably unpleasant experience. But I could be wrong.

Posted by: brenda at November 2, 2007 10:58 PM

@Popsi-zen -- I second that. I know someone (my sister-in-law) who was an actress in Chicago and knew him back in the day. She says he was a total douche, very full of himself (unlike the infinitely more talented David Sedaris, who she also knew). Okay, so much for my name-dropping by proxy. The point is, I've always got that not-physically-attractive-but-still-i'm-too-good-for-you vibe from him and I've never been much of a fan. HOWEVER, my husband and I watched "1408" (meh) on Halloween and all I could thing of was how much he looks like Bill Hicks now. And I love Bill Hicks. Seriously -- the guy needs to STOP with the lame-ass rom-coms (and now cute-kid flicks) and do the Bill Hicks story. It could be like "American Splendor" but better, with the right people writing and directing. This could seriously revive his career. However, I get the feeling the guy just can't see himself as anything but a romantic lead.

Posted by: RLS-1 at November 3, 2007 12:05 AM

Whoo! I'm all hot and bothered at the thought of a person named Darth Corleone.

Posted by: Your mom. Seriously. at November 3, 2007 12:21 AM

popsi-zen, i couldn't agree more. the first thing i thought when i saw the preview for Martian Child was "i bet they wished they could of cast haley joel osment in that role." It looks exactly like the second coming of Pay It Forward, but if i was able to forgive spacey for that, then i can forgive cusack for this.

Posted by: citizen_cris at November 3, 2007 2:16 AM

why all the hard-ons for Cusack. he plays a self obsessed whiny shit bag in all his movies. He takes zero risks in the characters/movies he chooses and he's a total prick in real life but gets off cause he plays non-dick roles. F-him and shitty cliched filled movies!

Posted by: grooldog at November 3, 2007 11:56 AM

Well Dustin, you have obviously been sleeping with the wrong men. Yeah we're pretty easy to get into gear but if you are going to drive us to a satisfying climax it takes a little technique if not effort. I suppose that your lack of enjoyable results is in direct correlation to your lack of effort. As with many processes, you only get out of it what you put into it. Condolences to your partners; you should not expect them to do all the work. The journey should be as enjoyable (for both) as the destination.

Posted by: rudy at November 3, 2007 6:10 PM

I don't know if it is all the douchebag comments I've heard (through other people)him make or the crap he puts on the huffington post or the reports of how he treats the people who pay to see his movies (not to mention wait staff)but I really think his douchebaggery is starting to show in his acting. Although it could just be the image is tarnished beyond all repair ,I just get the feeling that each new roll he plays he either feels is beneath him or above us (the movie going public) either way I'm through. And I read in a rag somewhere where Piven did an interview about Cusack being a dick to him now that he is successful in something or another I laughed at the douche calling the douche a douche.

Posted by: ccr at November 5, 2007 5:24 PM

I'm going to be superficial once again: never thought Cusack was cute.

Posted by: Samantha T at November 6, 2007 6:25 AM

Is it just me, or does the kid in the photo appear to be spinning his head around à la Linda Blair?

Posted by: QueBarbara at November 6, 2007 2:19 PM

i was the second for one of the characters in a movie starring John Cusack umpteen years ago -- the one about a guy who finds a million dollars that fell off a truck and he goes mad. i remember John staying completely in character. i tried flirting with him but he didn't give me the time of day bec he was busy being mad. you have to take my word that i was hot back in the day. i am stunned that that man would take on a role that gets this kind of review. then again, come to think of it, nobody watched that mad money movie either.

Posted by: nix at November 8, 2007 10:25 PM