free counter with statistics Lust, Caution | Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

Lust%20Caution%20Image.jpg

The Smile on Your Face was the Deadest Thing

Lust, Caution (Se, jie) / Constance Howes

Film Reviews | October 19, 2007 | Comments (30)


Ang Lee is one of my favorite directors. He is detailed, poetic and supremely smart in his film craft. What I appreciate most about his work, however, is that his storytelling is patient; building moment by moment, character by character, and event by event with an unbridled appreciation for the power of silence and the weight of the subtext. I imagine one could find this attitude tedious or even boring, but unlike the neon, neurotic film quality of other detail-oriented directors, Lee’s efforts seem masterfully sane. I know, I’m gushing. I can’t help it. I’ve been anticipating Lust, Caution for quite a while and I’m happy to report that it was well worth the wait. Though the film is stubbornly long and a dark, melodramatic account of people far too skilled at deceit but fatally ill-equipped to suffer the emotional consequences of such masquerades, it still manages to be totally watchable. Of course, you’re all wondering what’s up with the whole NC-17 sexiness scandal and Ang’s artsy refusal to change one hair on his film’s…er, head. Well, we’ll get there.

Lust, Caution (Se, jie) is based on the same-named short story by Eileen Chang published in 1950. Both works are set in World War II and witness the attempts of a small, slapdash group of student resistance fighters to assassinate a powerful compatriot supporter of the Japanese occupation. Tang Wei (in a “this girl better win every damn acting award in existence or I’m definitely going to be ticked” debut performance) plays Wong Chia Chi (or Wang Jiazhi), a demure student at the University of Hong Kong who is recruited by spitfire Kuang Yu Min (Lee-Hom Wang) to perform the female lead in a politically-themed school play. Both Kuang and Wong Chia Chi’s lives are defined by the ongoing war: Kuang’s older brother was killed in battle prompting his mother to forbid her younger son from joining the army, while the death of Chia Chi’s mother left her abandoned by her British father and in the care of chilly, Chinese relatives.

The gang’s heavy-handed nationalistic play tugs patriotic heartstrings and brings the audience to it’s feet with passionate cries of “China will not fail!” but mostly serves to spark a bonfire of rebellion within the acting group itself. Not content to simply stage the wartime suffering, Kuang suggests they do their part to end it by offing Japanese collaborator, Mr. Yee (Tony Leung Chiu Wai). The kids infiltrate Mr. Yee’s world as actors by pal-ing around with one of his subordinates and assuming false identities. Cantonese country girl, Chia Chi becomes Mak Tai Tai, the fictional wife of a wealthy Hong Kong exporter. Though she successfully wins the trust of both Yee and his wife, she finds that her role is complicated when Yee’s attentions turn sexual. Suddenly, she is thrust into a very real, very seedy adulthood without much of a previous identity to cling to. Tang Wei reads this role impeccably. Ang Lee has her smoking cigarettes, walking across rooms and pushing back window curtains true to introspective form, but the simple change of expression in her eyes and posture sells the transformation from child to woman in an unbeatable instant. Tang Wei is, like someone announced loudly during the movie credits, “breathtaking.”

When the first assassination attempt is abruptly and brutally botched, the group has no choice but to fade into obscurity and wait for another chance. Chia Chi, stripped of her youthful naiveté, struggles with her now empty identity and wanders blearily through the next three years. When Kuang Yu Min tracks her down for round two of “kill the bad guy,” he is backed by the actual resistance who offer training, professional forgeries and much higher stakes. Chia Chi appears almost grateful to reenter the ruse. Soon enough, Mak Tai Tai is back in both the Yee’s home and good graces. She plays endless games of Mah Jong with the wives of the Hong Kong elite and feeds any pertinent chit chat back to the resistance in hopes of tracking, and ultimately killing, Yee. Her efforts prove to be virtually impossible since Yee is “an old wolf” who keeps his cards close to, nay, inside his chest and Chia Chi is forced to step up the farce or risk not only another failure, but also her own life. This is about the time when the sexy stuff really comes into play. Lee apparently had a doozy of a time with censorship. He didn’t back down for the US despite being slapped with a needless NC-17 rating, but it seems he actually cut out some of the racy stuff for public release in China, which really is a shame.

Lust, Caution is incredibly graphic, but each sexual act (there are three distinct encounters) characterizes Mak Tai Tai’s relationship with Yee in a way that dialogue could never hope to. Yee’s initial sexual sadism and ferocity turns comparatively kittenish as Chia Chi / Mak Tai Tai slowly, but surely, ensnares him. Each embrace, look, sexual position and sound during their infidelity lends necessary weight to their carefully constructed relationship. When the power balance shifts for good and Chia Chi realizes that she has irrevocably become Mak Tai Tai, the audience is privy to the why of it in no uncertain terms. The mere implication of a sex life would not have accurately conveyed why Chia Chi would trade to her true identity for a fictional one. In a moment of weakness, our heroine explains to Kuang in half simile, half truth: “He’s (Yee) like a snake that is working itself into my heart.”

With the rich film color, the intimate, shadow portraits and the wide panoramic shots of culturally clashed China Lust, Caution is a fortress of visual snackitude. I felt guilty at times for gazing at Mrs. Yee’s (Joan Chen) impossibly delicate tea set, Mak Tai Tai’s silk Quipao dresses and the dusty, rickshaw laden streets of war torn Hong Kong instead of the subtitles. It was worth it, though. I suppose Lust, Caution might not be a perfect movie, but it came close. Even after 2 1/2 long hours and a whole bottle of water, the end still found me incredibly invested, clenching the arms of my seat and listening to whispered cries in the audience of “No! Don’t say it,” and “Hurry!”

Constance Howes is a book critic for Pajiba and a graphic designer living in Philadelphia. Her hobbies include making out and messing shit up. In short, she’s a firecracker. She blogs over at I Love You in the Face.









Pajiba Love 10/18/07 | Things We Lost in the Fire


Comments

I'm glad to read a good review of this, since I'm a slave to Tony Leung but previous reviews have been mixed. Thanks.

Posted by: Todd at October 19, 2007 9:24 AM

Oh. my. god.

Thank you, Constance, for an incredible review, and for the news (which I had somehow missed) that Ang Lee has put out another movie. Ang Lee, Tony Leung, and Joan Chen too? I am SO THERE.

...if it ever comes to my little Southern town. Not bloody likely.

Posted by: Heqit at October 19, 2007 9:46 AM

So Lee had to go and ruin it with all the pornographic content thus guaranteeing that almost no one will get to see it do to the NC-17. What's the purpose of this. How does it even serve the storytelling?

Seriously, any director who nowadays decides to up the graphic sex content without serving the story is just an irresponsible pervert.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 19, 2007 11:17 AM

Barb, honey, sometimes you just want to see some hot Asians doin' it well in a film that is also well done and by a brilliant director. (see also: various Wong Kar Wei films)



I am so excited about this, and I'm glad Lee stuck to his guns on the censorship. I'm also pretty sure that Ang Lee doesn't really do "gratuitous."

Posted by: Leigh at October 19, 2007 11:25 AM

Leigh: that's what porn is for.

I don't see how sex scenes that will get a film such a rating serves THIS story in particular. His "vision" ended up screwing the investors.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 19, 2007 11:31 AM

The movie was certainly not "ruined" by the sex scenes. As noted in the review, the plot is aided by the scenes, and the characters would have been hollow without them. Besides that, the scenes are pretty tasteful and well done, it's certainly not low-brow porn.

Also, anyone who doesn't go and see this movie because of the NC-17 rating obviously couldn't appreciate it that much.

Posted by: lfrac88 at October 19, 2007 11:31 AM

The movie was certainly not "ruined" by the sex scenes. As noted in the review, the plot is aided by the scenes, and the characters would have been hollow without them. Besides that, the scenes are pretty tasteful and well done, it's certainly not low-brow porn.

Also, anyone who doesn't go and see this movie because of the NC-17 rating obviously couldn't appreciate it that much.

Posted by: lfrac88 at October 19, 2007 11:32 AM

Leigh, I agree. I think that Constance did a good job of describing exactly the why NC-17 material was important and necessary to the movie. Cheers to Lee for standing up for his film and refusing to cut it. If you want to cast blame for people not being able to see it, look at the MPAA or the industry in general, not the artist.

Posted by: Jen at October 19, 2007 11:35 AM

This is unbelievable, so I'm supposed to believe that the ONLY way to tell this tale (based on a very tight little short story btw) was by piling on violent sexual content that merits an NC17 rating?
Is this the same site that went all ape-shit over the objectification of women in torture porn flicks?

Ha! so you CAN objectify and violate women on film! All you have to do is dress it up as "art" and attach a director with some cred. I'll keep that in mind.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 19, 2007 12:03 PM

Barb:

Did you even read the review, idiot?

Posted by: sia at October 19, 2007 12:07 PM

I agree with Jen, Leigh, and Constance. I found the sex scenes to be integral to the story and plot and character development. It would have been a different and far inferior movie without them.

I quote (for those that obviously didn't read Constance's brilliant review [ahem, looking at you B.S.]): "Lust, Caution is incredibly graphic, but each sexual act (there are three distinct encounters) characterizes Mak Tai Tai's relationship with Yee in a way that dialogue could never hope to." And, also, "The mere implication of a sex life would not have accurately conveyed why Chia Chi would trade to her true identity for a fictional one."

'Bout sums it up right there, doesn't it B-Slim?
What burr got up Slim's butt that he is defending investors, rather than focussing on the audience?

Brilliant review of a powerful movie. Ang Lee answered a question I had been wondering: How could he possibly make another movie as heartfelt, true, and moving as Brokeback Mountain? Well, he did.

Posted by: rudy at October 19, 2007 12:13 PM

BarbadoSlim,

Are not you objectifying women by saying that portraying their sexuality frankly and honestly is objectification?

The sexuality in torture porn is gratuitous and, often, completely one-sided, where as here it grows organically out of the characters and the story. What's so wrong with that? What are you afraid of?

Posted by: b00 at October 19, 2007 12:15 PM

First of all, I'm crossing my fingers that I can find a theater within a 50-mile radius that's showing this (though, from the review, a farther trek might be warranted).

Secondly:

"I suppose Lust, Caution might not be a perfect movie, but it came close. Even after 2 1/2 long hours and a whole bottle of water, the end still found me incredibly invested, clenching the arms of my seat and listening to whispered cries in the audience of "No! Don't say it," and "Hurry!" "

Constance, did you intend to end your review with a phrase almost identical to the one that capped Jeremy's review of Brokeback Mountain (the last Ang Lee flick reviewed here), or do you two simply have similar, and excellent, taste?

Posted by: becca at October 19, 2007 12:34 PM

Our local paper reviewed this movie (quite favorably, I might add) this past weekend. One of the most interesting comments made by the reviewer was the following:

"The filmmakers, including screenwriters James Schamus and Hui-Ling Wang, are showing us the battle between two wills, not a pornographic peep show. (This subtle distinction has eluded the ratings board of the Motion Picture Association of America, which recently gave an R rating to The Heartbreak Kid, a comedy that makes sight gags out of forceful, graphic sex, children snorting cocaine and even bestiality.)"

I think that perhaps the old saw about the American Public (or at least the MPAA) being more terrified of authentic sexual relations between consenting adults than overwhelming graphic violence is still very true. And really, very sad.

Posted by: pinkcheese at October 19, 2007 12:40 PM

Ang Lee is one of my favorite directors too! Thanks for the great review Constance, I can't wait to see this.

Also, Tony Leung is super hot.

Posted by: Jen at October 19, 2007 1:00 PM

Hmm, Barbado I am kind of surprised by you on this one. Your reaction to sex on screen is interesting considering this movie, an arthouse Chinese picture, is hardly gratuitous and uses sex to move the plot forward in ways that dialogue can't.

This discussion could easily migrate onto feministing...the rating system in the US is skewed towards violence and away from sexuality, particularly feminine sexuality. The idea that sex- the universal themes of power struggles, non-verbal connections, silent actions over words, is more frightening than blood and guts and has to be classified with/as porn just shows what a slippery slope American morality is on. I don't always agree with Naomi Wolf but in Promiscuties she wrote about how we have eliminated sensuality (touching and kissing) from the Victorian age and have gone so chaste that ANY touch immediately powers towards all out sex.

Personally, I think sex is a very relevant, albeit uncomfortable, part of adult filmmaking. Just look at "Tell me you love me" on HBO. I don't mind that this film is NC 17. In fact, I think there should be more NC 17 films so it changes the connotations from porn to adult storytelling. Unfortunately, studios are so afraid of the NC 17 rating and reaching that middle ground teen market that a lot ends up on the cutting room...

And with that.

Have a good weekend Pajibans! Amanda

Posted by: Amanda47 at October 19, 2007 1:22 PM

You know, NC-17 doesn't mean "no one can watch this movie." It just means it's a movie for ADULTS, and frankly, I enjoy an intelligent piece of art with some sex thrown in. Sex is an integral part of life, and it does humanity a disservice to eliminate it from our art and culture. Just because some people are uncomfortable with sex doesn't mean the entire world has to pretend it doesn't exist. That's what the NC-17 rating is for, so if sex freaks you out, you can go ahead and not watch this movie.

Posted by: cady at October 19, 2007 4:04 PM

Thanks for the review- I love Ang Lee, and cannot wait to see this film!

Posted by: demondoll at October 19, 2007 4:20 PM

Man, I've seen this poster so many times that I'm surprised the film is actually coming out.

Thanks for the great review.

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at October 19, 2007 11:32 PM

I saw this movie about a week ago and still can't get it out of my mind. It haunts you and seeps into your bones. I would put this movie in my top 3 movies of all time.

Posted by: s.eth at October 20, 2007 2:10 AM

Considering some of the things BarbadoSlim has said before with regard to Asian women (look at his comment on this http://yeeeah.com/blog/2007/09/07/vanessa-hudgens-is-dead-meat/)
it doesn't surprise me that he feels threatened by a film portraying complex Asian sexuality.

Posted by: Genevieve at October 20, 2007 12:45 PM

Posted by: Genevieve at October 20, 2007 12:47 PM

Huh?
How does a NC-17 rating prevent almost everyone from seeing a film?
Unless we've slipped into the Twilight Zone and have awaken in 'Kid Nation'... ?

Posted by: Rykker at October 21, 2007 4:15 AM

In reference to the number of people asking why an NC-17 film would prevent everyone from having a chance to watch it:

There are some movie theater and rental chains (Can't remember exactly which ones. Anyone?) that have a policy about not showing or renting any movies rated NC-17. So for people in areas where there isn't a variety of movie theater chains there might not be a showing available for them. Here in Richmond nearly all the cinemas are run by Regal, so if Regal has that "No NC-17 policy" it's highly unlikely that I'll see this one until it comes out on DVD.

That's why the rating is viewed as a monetary kiss of death for a film; it limits the film's ability to screen in a larger number of theaters.

Posted by: Alabamapink at October 21, 2007 1:34 PM

didn't anyone catch The Ice Storm?That one had 'average' written all over it.

Posted by: daniel at October 21, 2007 8:18 PM

Hey ripvandaniel, did you just awaken from a prolonged slumber? What does your comment have to do with the subject at hand?

Posted by: rudy at October 22, 2007 6:56 AM

Great review, Constance. I really like Tony Leung (and wasn't aware Wang Lee-Hom was in this!), so I'm glad to hear it's good. A minor quibble - it's "qipao", not "quipao".

Posted by: Toklas at October 22, 2007 5:49 PM

I am assuming that you were able to take your eyes off "the dusty, rickshaw laden streets of war torn Hong Kong" and read the subtitles long enough to realize that the entire second half of the film actually took place in war torn Shanghai?

Posted by: noname at October 22, 2007 7:08 PM

Great review and spot on about the sexual content - absolutely contextual and necessary to the story. Just one correction - the main action takes place in Shanghai, not Hong Kong, which is where the preliminary stuff takes place.

Posted by: just a minute... at October 23, 2007 4:05 AM

I just saw this movie and it is breathtaking. I cannot understand why this is not R rated film.
It is a grown up film. The final sexual act is disturbing, but only because you can tell what is happening to her character without any words being spoken.
Great movie, go see it if you have to drive an hour to the theatre. I was lucky and drove 15min.

Posted by: mamitabrujita at November 30, 2007 12:57 AM



searchthesite.jpg