free counter with statistics Lonely Hearts | Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

lonelyhearts.jpg

Gumshoe Flick? Nah — That’s Just Gum on your Shoe

Lonely Hearts / Dustin Rowles

Film Reviews | April 10, 2007 | Comments (22)


All right — first of all, let’s just put our feelings toward Jared Leto and John Travolta aside. Hell, let’s not allow our perception of Salma Hayek and James Gandolfini to color our opinion of Lonely Hearts, either. Let’s also, for a moment, forget that the true story of Ray Fernandez and Martha Beck has been told before, in what must have been the infinitely superior 1970 film, The Honeymoon Killers.

Instead, let’s — for a second — just focus on the first five minutes of Lonely Hearts. Let’s gander at the first scene after the credits have finished rolling: Elmer “Buster” Robinson (Travolta) and Charles Hildebrandt (Gandolfini) walk down a flight of stairs and into a viewing room, where we are given a close-up of an electric chair. Gandolfini’s voiceover states in hackneyed Ellroyian terms: “If any two maggots ever deserved to boil in their own shit, it was Ray Fernandez and Martha Beck.” Cut to three-years earlier, in which we are shown Ray Fernandez (Leto), a confidence man, picking up lonely ladies and swindling their money, until Martha Beck (Hayek) comes along and falls in love with him immediately, despite her knowledge of what he does for a living.

So what can we conclude from the first five minutes, having absolutely no previous knowledge of Fernandez and Beck? Well, we know from Gandolfini’s voiceover that they are going to be fried in the electric chair, and we know too (because con men don’t get the chair for conning) that Beck and Fernandez will kill a few people. And because Robinson and Hildebrandt are at the execution, we can fairly assume that they will be the cops responsible for catching them.

(Spoiler Warning Ahead for Those Who Lack a Sense of the Obvious.)

And that’s pretty much exactly what happens. There are no surprises in Lonely Hearts. Everything plays out almost as you’d expect it from watching the first five minutes. So, why start with that information, when writer/director Todd Robinson has no intention of throwing any curveballs our way? Beats the hell out of me. Honest to God, watching Lonely Hearts is akin to reading the last chapter of a pulp detective novel, and then starting from the beginning. Only here, instead of meaty Sam Spade-type characters, pulpy dialogue, and hard-boiled detective work, we’re given John Travolta and Jared Leto, who are about as fun to watch as thrombosis, never mind that Leto is one of the more detestable celebrities in Hollywood, that Travolta takes his cues from Xenu, that Gandolfini plays the same character he always plays (Tony Soprano as a cop) or that Hayek — pretty she may be — still has absolutely no big-screen talent.

But what’s really perplexing about Lonely Hearts is that Todd Robinson leaves out one of the more intriguing aspects of the story, namely that Martha Beck was an extremely obese woman whose girth was a metaphor for her sexual appetite and raging jealousy, which acted as a powder keg to their killing spree. What the fuck was the casting director thinking? “Hey, we need an unlikable 233-pound nurse who looks like a sack of potatoes with three chins strapped on top.” “Sweet! You think Salma Hayek would be available?”

In the true story of Martha Beck and Ray Fernandez, as in the cinematic travesty, Martha and Ray meet through the Lonely Hearts correspondence club and together operate a scheme in which Ray would woo women, propose marriage to them, and steal their money, while Martha posed as his sister, allowing her to keep an eye on her lover. But it was Martha’s insane jealousy that provoked her to kill Ray’s con victims in the first place, for fear that Ray would fall in love with them. Here, the same feelings drive her motives, but we’re left looking at Salma Hayek and wondering why in fuck’s name would she even be interested in Ray Fernandez as Leto depicts him: A weaselly, balding, sniveling guy with only marginal acting ability. If you were the type to yell things at the screen, you’d probably scream, “Look in the mirror, Salma. Have you seen that booty of yours? Why are you bothering with that shitheel?”

And, of course, Todd Robinson is not content to just muck up the should-be fascinating serial killer story, he also decides to screw up a separate subplot, this one focusing on Buster’s motivation (the guilt of his wife’s suicide) to track down Fernandez and Beck, as well as a ridiculous and superfluous affair between him and a co-worker (Laura Dern) that adds absolutely nothing to the proceedings. And you’d think that Robinson might be able to liven up this particular plotline, knowing that it was based upon his own goddamn grandfather’s investigation. But in fact, Robinson’s account is far less salacious than the true story of Beck and Fernandez played out, which included instances in which Beck would “try out” Fernandez’s lovers, if you get what I mean.

So, essentially what Robinson has done here is to take a very interesting story, sanitize it, and replace detestable real-life serial killers with the more aesthetically pleasing Leto and Hayek, forsaking all the really grim, scandalous and sensational details of the real story, giving us a a serial killer flick for the People magazine demographic. Oh, and for good measure, he also throws in some godawful Gandolfini voice-overs (“He was quite the bard. Always slipping in a little fishing expedition to feel out their bank accounts. He smelled money: Valentino. He thought they were broke: He’d bounce them like a bad check.”) just to compound the misery, because what we, the audience, needs more than anything is another reason to hate Lonely Hearts.

But for all of you who would love nothing more than to see Jared Leto fry in an electric chair, Lonely Killers at least has that going for it. Sadly, it has little else.

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. He lives with his wife in Ithaca, New York. You may email him, or leave a comment below.









God Hates Pajibas | Pajiba Love 04/10/07


Comments

Wow, so when it looks like a turd and smells like a turd...must be a turd.

Sad really...it had all the fixins to be a good flick...thanks for the review.

Posted by: Helcat at April 10, 2007 3:22 PM

y'esh! not that i was going to see it anyways, but... y'esh!

Posted by: Kevin at April 10, 2007 3:24 PM

Wow; I can't imagine casting Salma Hayek in that role. Just so everyone knows, The Honeymoon Killers is a pretty excellent version of the story -- it's all low-budget and grainy and cheap-looking, and it focuses on Ray & Martha, it doesn't follow the cops at all, and they're so...crass. It's a really ugly, fascinating movie.

Posted by: Brendais at April 10, 2007 3:39 PM

The apex of Jared Leto's acting "career" was having his face cleaved with an axe by Patrick Bateman in American Psycho.

Posted by: Manny at April 10, 2007 3:40 PM

"The apex of Jared Leto's acting "career" was having his face cleaved with an axe by Patrick Bateman in American Psycho."

I was gonna go with having his face kicked in by Durden in "Fight Club", but, nonetheless, any movie with harm done to Leto's face is good enough for me.

Haven't seen the "Honeymoon Killers", but now I'm intrigued. Sounds better than this version.

Posted by: em at April 10, 2007 4:26 PM

hell, I didn't even know this movie was made or going to be released, much less in a theater AS I TYPE THIS. meh.

Posted by: b_g at April 10, 2007 4:33 PM

Dammit dammit dammit! I was so hoping this would be a great movie. The filmmakers could have done so much with it, the source material is morbidly fascinating. Part of it was filmed at a farm about 5 miles up the road from my house so I was really hoping to go and see not only a good movie, but recognize the places where some scenes were filmed.

Posted by: stardust savant at April 10, 2007 6:23 PM

ive never even heard of this movie. and now i know why.

Posted by: bob at April 10, 2007 9:08 PM

Come on, guys. It takes a innovative and courageous director to take an interesting, clever story, and make it completely mundane and idiotic.

Congratulations, Todd Robinson. You are that director.

Oh, and Jared? Stop making music. Please? Pretty please? You have one half-decent song. But... I sometimes fantasize about watching Marilyn Manson devour you alive. That says something.

Posted by: TK at April 10, 2007 9:18 PM

I don't understand the attitude towards Ms Hayek. Whenever she's been on "Ugly Betty", she owns the screen. All eyes are on her. She was also perfect as 'Frida'. So please be more specific on why you think she can't act or can't hold her own opposite other stars.

Posted by: matt at April 10, 2007 11:33 PM

Martin Scorcese was supposed to direct the original, but got fired after one week after he spent that week trying to frame an empty soda can in a bush. Just goes to show you that when you're making lurid, pulpy low-budget flicks, you can't get too artsy.

Posted by: Hell Britannia at April 10, 2007 11:40 PM

I'm sorry Matt, but Salma Hayek does NOT own the screen on Ugly Betty. She might if you're remotely attracted to her, but for those of us that aren't, we can see the campy acting for what it is. I love Salma Hayek, but I'm not at all deluded that she is a wonderful actress. Yes, she was good in Frida, but that was her pet project and she probably acted her heart out. Just because you're beautiful doesn't mean you can carry a role like this, even if it was sanitized to the point of meaninglessness.

Posted by: Rachael at April 11, 2007 12:00 AM

"All right -- first of all, let's just put our feelings toward Jared Leto and John Travolta aside."

I'll get on that. Right after I finish slicing off my nipples, super-gluing them to my eyeballs and mastering blinking comfortably under these new conditions.

There are two little rooms. Travolta is in one, Leto in the other. The doors will be sealed for seven days. There's a gun to your head--you have to choose to stay in one of those rooms. Which will it be?

Posted by: Ranylt at April 11, 2007 9:52 AM

Ranylt, that's easy. I subdue my attacker, take his gun, shoot Travolta, and force the attacker into the room with Jared Leto.

Either than or I shoot all three.

If he can't be subdued... I take the bullet.

Posted by: TK at April 11, 2007 12:55 PM

TK - Best. Plan. Ever. Bravo.

Posted by: alanna at April 11, 2007 3:15 PM

I'm not totally familiar with the original story, but does anyone else find it odd that Leto is playing a guy with the last name Fernandez, while Hayek is playing someone with the last name Beck? Shouldn't his character be an hispanic person and hers be a white one? Je suis confusée.

Posted by: b at April 11, 2007 3:46 PM

This was the big Saturday night movie at the Jacksonville Film FestivaI last year and it was a huge letdown. The review got it right. At least there was free alcohol afterwards.

Posted by: Anna at April 11, 2007 3:48 PM

TK for president! You are right on!!

Posted by: derekthered at April 11, 2007 7:03 PM

My first informative post here ever-

I want to see this other movie (a Criterion selection, no less)-
http://www.imagesjournal.com/2003/reviews/honeymoon/text.htm

It makes this Travolta movie seem even more pointless, if that's possible.

Posted by: Steve at April 13, 2007 1:45 PM

One more link- the real story is truely bizarre-

http://www.crimelibrary.com/serial_killers/partners/fernandez/1.html

He actually had a 'THE LOOKOUT' type accident that changed his personality. And believed he had sexual powers due to voodoo.

How it got morphed into a story with Salma Hayek, I'll never know. Maybe they should've done a SHALLOW HAL-type transformation on her, that woulda worked!

Posted by: Steve Lang at April 13, 2007 1:59 PM

Some how I doubt that acting ability had anything to do with how she got the role. It sounds like the director didn't want to go with the facts on this one and decided to just shove his head up his a$$. I have yet to see Leto act in anything or maybe I assumed that he was just a paid extra at the time. Once again Hollywood shows us what the results of money and inbreeding can do. Pity though because I actually really like Gandolfini

Posted by: bestleftunsaid at April 15, 2007 11:57 PM

A movie with the same story and the same title has already been made. It was directed and edited by faculty members of the film school I go to.

http://imdb.com/title/tt0102329/

This is trivia, not a reccomendation.

Posted by: a name could be stupid to give here at April 25, 2007 1:11 AM



searchthesite.jpg