free counter with statistics Last Legion, The | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

aishwarya_rai6.jpg

My Sandal. Your Ass.

The Last Legion / Dustin Rowles

Film Reviews | August 17, 2007 | Comments (67)


The Last Legion hits over 2000 screens today across the country, and for most folks, I’m guessing, the first you’ve heard of it was when you clicked on this review. Indeed, I knew nothing of its existence until it popped up on the release schedule, and still, I’ve yet to see a single advertisement or trailer. As such, I had absolutely no preconceived notions, nor any bloody idea what the film was about when I sat down to watch it, other than the fact that IMDb tells me that both Colin Firth (1995’s Mr. Darcy) and Ben Kingsley were in it and, judging by the title and a few screen shots I could find, sandals would be featured prominently. I suspected that the film slipped under my radar because the marketing and advertising campaigns were directed, telepathically, at only those women and gay men who had always wanted to see Mr. Firth in a swords-and-sandal epic and thus the studio-manufactured neural waves flew just over my head, despite my score of 2 on the Kinsey scale. For that demographic, however, I’m sorry to report that your frustration and disappointment with The Last Legion will exist on a plane similar to that of a bad case of fellatio-lockjaw (damn! I think I found a name for my fantasy football team this year) — it’s there for the taking, but it’s all mildly PG-rated.

As it turns out, the type of film and what to expect is more or less given away within the first 90 seconds of The Last Legion with a prologue delivered by the narrator, Ben Kingsley’s Ambrosinus (gesundheit):

The legend began underneath these dark hills and under the same sky. It tells of a sword of great power forged for the conquer of Julius Caesar. This weapon was passed down until it reached the last of Caesar’s noble line, the emperor Tiberius. Upon his death, it was hidden away to keep it from the hands of evil men. For generations it lay in a secret place marked by the sign of a pentagon and, as it was written, under the very gaze of Caesar.

Indeed, Ambrosinus (gesundheit) reveals that it was his life’s pursuit to find the sword and the one “righteous enough to wield it.” That pursuit took him back to Rome, where its “bravest and best” were called back to defend its boundaries in 460 A.D. And, if you’re like me — i.e., you gave up on “Rome” midway through the first episode because anything before, say, the 6th Century A.D. has a homicidally narcoleptic effect on you — I can’t imagine you’d need any more to extinguish any desire you had in seeing The Last Legion (especially if Superbad is playing in the same theater). And, indeed, for the first 20 minutes or so of The Last Legion, I hated it with all the zeal of Dick Cheney at a baby-head eating convention. It seemed, briefly, that the competition between Troy and Alexander for this century’s most torturous peplum epic would soon be moot: The Last Legion would take the sand-and-urine filled trophy cup home to sit atop its Greco-Roman mantle.

But it was about at the 20-minute mark, after we learn that Ambrosinus (gesundheit) is a long-haired, robe-wearing philosopher capable of turning rocks into feathers and that the rightful emperor to Rome and heir to Caesar is the goddamn kid from Love, Actually (Thomas Sangster) when I realized that The Last Legion was not exactly what it at first seemed. Nope. It’s actually a fucking kiddie flick — the sort of throwaway fantasy epic boys 9-11 in 1989 would’ve probably enjoyed because of its nonsensical, undeveloped-brain friendly mythology.

With that perspective, the intensity of my hate fell from Rosie O’Donnell level to a milder level of dislike reserved for things like Rhonda Byrne’s The Secret, which merely irritate by existing, doubly so for The Last Legion because I fucking had to deal with it. I mean, if you’re going to do a silly kid’s swashbuckler on sand — directed by the guy (Doug Leflar) behind a few Xena episodes, a Hercules TV movie, and Dragonheart: A New Beginning — why in God’s blessed name do you enroll respected actors to deliver overwrought dialogue, such as this nugget of wisdom motherfucking Ghandi has to give to Romulus: “Did you see anything? Anything written? Then you know all you need to know.” But then again, I suppose even Nate and Hayes had its Tommy Lee Jones and The Sword and the Sorcerer had its Richard Moll.

Here, Colin Firth — in the most ridiculous outfit I’ve seen since his hand-knitted reindeer sweater in Bridget Jones — is Aurelius, charged with rescuing Romulus (the aforementioned Sangster) after the Goths overrun Rome and kill the boy’s folks, leaving Odaecer (Peter Mullan) and his henchman, Wulfila (“Rome’s” Kevin McKidd in a silly silly beard) in control of Rome. That’s right, Odaecer and Wulfila — and people give Gwyneth shit for naming her daughter Apple. Anyway, they banish Romulus, along with Ambrosinus (gesundheit), to the island of Capri and Aurelius puts together a crack-team of homoerotic swordsmen to rescue the boy. They have exactly six days. I have no idea why.

Once the kid is saved and finds his sword, Aurelius and his gang (which also includes Bollywood legend Aishwarya Rai as the Lara Croftian Mira, whose smoking hotness exists on a sliding scale with her acting capabilities), have to get to Britannia to find a legion of men who will help them take back Rome. Standing in their way is Volkyn, who looks like one of the guys in the Eyes Wide Shut orgy scene, a notion that actually might’ve put the film’s unintentional sexual innuendos in a much better context. Volkyn (seriously, who made up these names? A 7-year-old? Oh, wait: Peter Rader, the writer of Waterworld, is behind this mess) wants the sword, because he thinks he’s the rightful ruler, which sets up the sort of epic battle you’d expect in Braveheart if Braveheart had been produced for the WE! Network and was sponsored by some unnecessary vagina sanitizing product, replete with one of the most hackneyed, cringe-inducing “rousing” speeches I’ve ever heard, delivered by poor Colin Firth of all people: “Let us defend to the last breath this island of Britannia against those who would tear out its heart and soul. And then those who come after us will remember that there was such a thing as a Roman soldier (!) with a Roman sword (!) and a Roman heart (!). Hail Caesar!”

Jesus, Colin. That’s what he gets, I suppose, for taking a role as “action hero”; the corset suits him much better than the shield, I’m afraid.

Despite the almost constant swordplay and the multitude of stabbings, there is no blood in The Last Legion, which may be the film’s most impressive feat, except — perhaps — for the way it manages to mangle both Roman history and Arthurian fantasy. Because — you see — as it turns out (*spoilers ahead*), as we learn in the final minutes, Ambrosinus (gesundheit) is also Merlin, and Romulus is actually King Arthur’s father, and Caesar’s sword is actually … Excalibur.

Jumping Jehovah’s Witnesses.

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. He lives with his wife and son in Ithaca, New York. You may email him, or leave a comment below.


Air Guitar Nation | Invasion, The



Comments

"fellatio-lockjaw"
Wow... That right there is epic.
More epic than this movie ever had a CHANCE of being.

Posted by: Shaun at August 17, 2007 11:18 AM

I didn't recognize Colin Firth in that picture. I'm still not entirely convinced it's him. Mr. Darcy with stubble? Really, sometimes it's better to just accept the type-casting and go on with your life.

Posted by: Jen at August 17, 2007 11:28 AM

I read previews for this one and all it got out of me was a hearty "Meh". I mean, after 300 someone's really gonna have to crank it up to 20 to pique my interest and sword and sandals flick.

Posted by: Manny at August 17, 2007 11:34 AM

I saw one ad for this and was confused by hearing Colin Firth's voice. Is there a Bollywood dance number in the middle? That might be fun.

Um, these names are beyond stupid.
Romulus and Remus are the twins raised by wolves who FOUNDED Rome. You can't have another Romulus trying to save Rome unless we're in some Donnie Darko version of history, in which case where's Thomas Jefferson to smack Cheney upside the head.

Fellatio Lockjaw is my new porn name. My partners'? McLovin.

Posted by: Amanda47 at August 17, 2007 11:55 AM

P.S. What the hell Ben Kinglsey? Do you have an expensive drug, alcohol alimony problem we don't know about? You're running around in sandals, kissing Mary Kate Olsen (eww)? Go back...Go back! You sexy beast.

Posted by: Amanda47 at August 17, 2007 11:59 AM

Urgh I can't. type. today. Too much coffee makes me jittery.

- ? after upside the head
- Kingsley

Posted by: Amanda47 at August 17, 2007 12:01 PM

Colin Firth and Aishwarya Rai?

I. Can't. Not. Go...

Posted by: Seth L at August 17, 2007 12:09 PM

THEY MAY TAKE OUR LIVES... BUT THEY'LL NEVER TAKE... OUR ROUND TABLE!

Oh, wait. Wrong flick.

This irks me because it's not revisionist history. THAT, I could live with. No, it's complete fucking fantasy. They might as well just set the fucking thing in fairy land and make Arthur ride a magic flying unicorn. And Merlin can be a 12 year old girl who turns blue when angry. If you're gonna make shit up, just make a bunch of shit up. Don't do it under the guise of history.

Fucking hell.

Posted by: TK at August 17, 2007 12:12 PM

The "spoiler" is prominently featured in the ads for this so way to go marketing department! Probably because they knew it was the only interesting thing about the flick. Looked terrible so at least the review was entertaining.

As for Kingsley slumming in this role, remember that he played a vampire king in Uwe Boll's "Bloodrayne". If you haven't seen it don't bother, it's more dull than deliriously awful as hoped for.

Now that we have LOTR, is it too much to ask to get a well made King Arthur movie or series of movies that plays straight with the mythology of Camelot? I'm sick of this realistic/revisionist crap like "King Arthur" and "First Knight". It's been 25 years since "Excalibur", we're due for an update.

Posted by: Rob at August 17, 2007 12:29 PM

This sounds so awful. Is this billed as a "historical epic"? Thanks for giving me the ending. That gave me a pretty good laugh. Oh Mr. Darcy, how could you? Ben Kingsley, what is your excuse?

Love the quote, TK.

While 300 was fantastic, it was historically inaccurate, but when something looks that good you can look past minor flaws. There is no excuse for trying to pass fantasy for history.

Posted by: Melody at August 17, 2007 12:30 PM

I think Colin Firth must have some strange "Six Degrees of Jane Austen" thing going on. He comes to prominence as Mr. Darcy in an excellent P&P production, then sinks as low as is humanly possible in the (pauses to spew vomit) horrendous P&P "modernization", the Bridget Jones turd, then plays opposite Austen's Elinor Dashwood (Emma Thompson) in Love Actually (a film that began great and then deteriorated rapidly) and now he's playing opposite the Bollywood Elizabeth Bennett (Aiswarya Rai) in this movie.

Posted by: PaddyDog at August 17, 2007 12:41 PM

Aishwarya Rai...meh. She has this sleepy-drunk look in her eyes that is very unappealing to me. And Colin, please tell me that you owed someone money, or you lost a bet of some sort, because I cannot imagine you doing this.

Ben Kingsley...you know, I'm just not counting any films after "The House of Sand and Fog." Loved that one too much to sully my brain with this.

Posted by: Brie at August 17, 2007 12:44 PM

Dustin,

Friendly query--did you mean:

...this century's most torturous peplum (A loose outer robe worn by women in ancient Greece)epic,

or...this century's most torturous pablum (trite, naive, or simplistic ideas or writings; intellectual pap)epic?

Posted by: Dr. Derek at August 17, 2007 12:49 PM

For those of you that enjoy Arthurian myth, I highly recommend the book "The Dragon and the Unicorn" by AA Anastasio. It's a very bizarrre reimagining of the Arthur origin story involving norse and pagan mythology, as well as quantum physics and the occasional unicorn. Who is an interstellar creature created of energy packets.

Trust me, it's actually a really engaging, if somewhat challenging read.

Posted by: vaguelyamish at August 17, 2007 12:49 PM

About the names: they're real, or at least some of them are. Odoacer overthrew Romulus Augustulus in 476. There was a later Goth named Wulfila, although I don't know if there was one involved in this particular event.As for Aishwarya Rai's character, I can only ask: WTF? I don't need female characters and love stories to see a historical/action movie. I just need a good movie.

Posted by: Kate at August 17, 2007 12:52 PM

Jen, I'm with you...I don't believe that is Colin Firth either. Please Colin, go back to Austenland. And soon.

Posted by: KWV at August 17, 2007 12:53 PM

Wow. Usually I get behind actors I love who do crappy movies (see: Gary Oldman, The Scarlet Letter), but this is too much for me. Colin Firth must be having a serious identity crisis. I mean, no one in the world does stuffy English yet charming enough that you want to f*** him better than Colin Firth. And yet, here we have a pseudo-Arthurian legend where he dons sandals. However I must confess that I've always wondered what his legs looked like.

Posted by: Rachael at August 17, 2007 1:03 PM

goddamn kid from Love, Actually (Thomas Angster)
Sangster according to IMDB

Posted by: Brian at August 17, 2007 1:19 PM

Rachael: If you want to see Colin Firth's legs and an entertaining film, rent the original Fever Pitch (based on the Nick Hornby book) and ABSOLUTELY NOT the horrendous American version (I know Hornby needs a solid financial future for his autistic son but he really sold out letting them do that idiot re-make).

Posted by: PaddyDog at August 17, 2007 1:19 PM

Not a spoiler, actually since the entire way through this review I was thinking "I thought this was the new Excalibur movie I've seen advertised"

Posted by: Brian at August 17, 2007 1:27 PM

PaddyDog: Thanks! I've actually been looking for the original Fever Pitch film, but I think I'm going to put it in my netflix queue today. Even the cover for that remake gives me a horrendous headache.

Posted by: Rachael at August 17, 2007 1:28 PM

My cat's name is Romulus. Remus went to the ex, which saddens me because I think the cats should have had a duel before I moved out.

Posted by: lex at August 17, 2007 1:38 PM

and damn, can those Jehovah's Witnesses jump

Posted by: gunter at August 17, 2007 1:40 PM

I think Colin Firth is actually stuck in a "horrible child/tween movie" rut. See: What a Girl Wants and Nanny McPhee (also with Emma Thompson). Please, Colin, turn it around!

Posted by: Wendi at August 17, 2007 1:55 PM

I actually think I may have seen a trailer for this earlier this week. It passed by in a blur, and the only reason I even remember is that my husband shouted "JUNK!" at the screen, and I looked up just in time to see the film's name. Now, the husband regularly declares movies to be "JUNK!" based on the shittyness factor of their trailers, but I am glad that, this time at least, he's been proven correct in his shouting.

Posted by: Kolby at August 17, 2007 1:57 PM

HOLY SHIT.
This is Xena level storytelling right there but without the *wink* "we know this is for fun" factor.

Anyway, I found Clive Owens' King Arthur flick to be quite well accomplished and entertaining.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 17, 2007 2:18 PM

Oh, and in honor of this movie's naming scheme I shall henceforth be addressed a Barbadicus Slimminous .... Flavian.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 17, 2007 2:28 PM

Anyone else notice in the trailer for this film that the line "What you do in life echoes in eternity" is uttered? Hmmmm....where did I hear that one before? Very original.

Posted by: Matt at August 17, 2007 2:52 PM

This HAS to be the funniest review I have ever read on this site or any other, and we all know that's saying a lot. Hands-down hysterical. I need to go change...think I just peed my pants laughing my ass off.

Posted by: Di at August 17, 2007 2:57 PM

I never understood the appeal of Colin Firth. Perhaps because I hate all chick lit--whether it's Bridget Jones or Jane Austen--but he holds all the sex appeal of a plate of mashed potatoes for me.

King Arthur was a hackneyed hunk of cheese too, but at least it had Clive Owen AND Ioan Gruffudd.

Posted by: june at August 17, 2007 2:59 PM

That 'fro looks ridiculous on Firth, makes him look like morning DJ circa....hmmm 1974-75

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 17, 2007 3:08 PM

Hmmm, if following Barbado's lead correctly...I'd be....Kolburnia?

Posted by: Kolby at August 17, 2007 3:26 PM

They made a little movie a few years ago called King Arthur that did the exact same thing as this: bring in "historical" and Roman elements into the King Arthur story. That movie TANKED at the box office, so I don't understand the point of making another movie that's pretty much THE EXACT SAME THING!!!! Also, I'm tired of King (motherfucking) Arthur. Make up some new stories already.

Posted by: Jeff at August 17, 2007 3:27 PM

They made a little movie a few years ago called King Arthur that did the exact same thing as this: bring in "historical" and Roman elements into the King Arthur story. That movie TANKED at the box office, so I don't understand the point of making another movie that's pretty much THE EXACT SAME THING!!!! Also, I'm tired of King (motherfucking) Arthur. Make up some new stories already.

Posted by: Jeff at August 17, 2007 3:27 PM

Sorry about the double!

Posted by: Jeff at August 17, 2007 3:28 PM

Hmmm, if following Barbado's lead correctly...I'd be....Kolburnia?

Posted by: Kolby at August 17, 2007 3:26 PM
***************************************************

YES, I would recommend you add maybe a Maximus and completely out of left field third name such as Plinicus

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 17, 2007 3:47 PM

Someone mentioned that Romulus and Remus were the founders of Rome and it stupid that someone named Romulus would try and save Rome. Sorry dude, but the last recognized emperor of the Western Roman Empire was a dude named Romulus. So I guess on that limited note, the movie isn't that stupidly cheesy. Just on that one point I guess.

Posted by: Diablo at August 17, 2007 4:16 PM

Umm... "'Rome's' Kevin McKidd is a silly silly beard."

IS a silly silly beard, or IN a silly silly beard? I can't decide which option sounds less appealing.

Posted by: AM at August 17, 2007 4:33 PM

Dr. Derek. Peplum "is a distinct film genre. The common English language term is "'sword & sandal film"', while in German the genre is known as "Sandalenfilm" or "Römer Film." The word "peplum" is the name of a diminutive skirt usually worn by men in these films." I learned this while searching for Romer Film synonyms. And I totally should've squeezed Sandalenfilm somewhere into the review.

AM: Should be "in." Noted and corrected. Same to you, Brian on "Sangster." Thank you both. -- F.L.

Posted by: Dustin Rowles at August 17, 2007 4:43 PM

My interior monologue throughout the majority of this review was along the lines of 'la la la la hee gesundheit la la la la'. Until I got to the spoilers, at which point it became 'la la la l-wait, what?'

Posted by: 'Cuno at August 17, 2007 5:13 PM

I must say, the spoiler made me snort. Loudly. And then choke on my water.

The whole review was hilarious.

Posted by: pinkcheese at August 17, 2007 5:45 PM

Fellatio Lockjaw, meet Cunnilingus Rugburn. Starring in "Blue Balls of Fire", the seminal work in the little known genre, abstinence porn. It's the Christian rock of the adult film industry.

I'm operating on little sleep. At least it's a keyboard and not a forklift.

Great review.

Posted by: denadn at August 17, 2007 5:47 PM

So....when is Pajiba supposed to be putting up their review of Superbad? How long are we supposed to wait? Because I'm getting pretty impatient.

Posted by: REW at August 17, 2007 6:09 PM

Dustin I enjoyed your review, but I have to go see this movie. I would do Colin Firth any time any place, so I'll just focus on him on the big screen and ignore the rest.

Posted by: LuvGems at August 17, 2007 6:24 PM

AWESOME! I just saw that Tyler Durden is making a film review website! Now I'll be able to go somewhere and see EXACTLY what it looks like when one guy rips all his 'news' and opinions from another site! I'm sure his reviews will be lucid, heavy with deep-rooted wit, and completely free of any sexist or homophobic ramblings! Color me excited! ...but only after you fuck him in the ear with a shovel.

Posted by: PissBoy at August 17, 2007 6:26 PM

King Arthur was a hackneyed hunk of cheese too, but at least it had Clive Owen AND Ioan Gruffudd.

Here, here! Ioan should play vaguely dark characters more often; he was damn sexy as Lancelot, if a tad vertically challenged.

June - the appeal of Colin Firth is lost on me as well. He's attractive enough, in an incredibly bland way. I've heard he's quite the nice fellow in person, though. Generally speaking, bumbling Brits don't do it for me. Then again, I think I'm among a small minority of women who don't drop the panties solely based on a man's accent.

Posted by: Daphne at August 17, 2007 6:43 PM

"June - the appeal of Colin Firth is lost on me as well. He's attractive enough, in an incredibly bland way. I've heard he's quite the nice fellow in person, though. Generally speaking, bumbling Brits don't do it for me. Then again, I think I'm among a small minority of women who don't drop the panties solely based on a man's accent."

It's not the accent, it's the eyes. Or maybe its the grin. He can use those eyes VERY effectively & his grin is just totally charming and appealing. But to each his own.

Posted by: LuvGems at August 17, 2007 6:52 PM

I've seen plenty of TV ads for this movie, but I only took notice because the line "Bring me Caesar's sword!" sounds like "Bring me seasoned salt!"

@ Matt: Indeed. Russell Crowe is laying in wait with a telephone for LL's writers.

Posted by: ohgrl at August 17, 2007 7:02 PM

"Bring me seasoned salt!"

I don't know why that strikes me as so hilarious, but I can't seem to stop giggling. And I haven't even seen the commercials...

Posted by: pinkcheese at August 17, 2007 7:21 PM

the film is actually loosely based on a book by an italian historian/fantasy author called Valerio Massimo Manfredi. i've read the book and though it is purely fiction, there is some cleverness behind the whole plot. the historical names are right, Romulus Augustulus and Odoacer were real figures, but the whole story has to be taken as fictional work.
now i havent seen the movie, 'cause probably it won't come out over here in italy, but as always i trust you guys and i won't be going to see it, maybe i'll just download it or something, just for the sake of laughing at something so utterly bad.

Posted by: pipe at August 17, 2007 7:35 PM

Man, even reading this review about the movie bored me to tears. Every time a part of the story appeared, I'd just doze off, mid-review.

I can't imagine how mind-numbingly boring this movie is.

Posted by: AD at August 17, 2007 7:48 PM

BRING ME SEASONED SALT!!

BRING ME OTHER CONDIMENTS!! AND A SPATULA!!

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 17, 2007 8:02 PM

i will go to see the INDIAN CHICK. I`ve heard she`s scary hot, smokin HOTTY...right SLIM?

Posted by: pasadenamike at August 17, 2007 9:12 PM

Pasadena

Read that the Indian chick is supposed to be the "most beautiful woman in the world", doubt it but I would like to see her for myself, I'll probably download this to stick to the man while am at it.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 17, 2007 9:47 PM

B-Slim, thats exactly what i heard also. The most beautiful WOMAN in the world..Aishwarya Rai lets hope this opens some doors (back would be nice!) for this sweet new flower!!

Posted by: pasadenamike at August 17, 2007 11:52 PM

"For that demographic, however, I'm sorry to report that your frustration and disappointment with The Last Legion will exist on a plane similar to that of a bad case of fellatio-lockjaw (damn! I think I found a name for my fantasy football team this year)"

That just made my freaking day.

Posted by: Ben at August 17, 2007 11:58 PM

As a devout Jehovah's Witness, I must correct you. We can't really jump, except for the black ones.

Posted by: Fernando at August 18, 2007 12:50 AM

It's not the accent, it's the eyes. Or maybe its the grin. He can use those eyes VERY effectively & his grin is just totally charming and appealing. But to each his own.

I hear you, although I don't agree. I was thinking about women I know who don't find Colin all that physically attractive, but rave about his accent. He's not the only actor I've heard referred to in that way - it seems to be something about American women and accents. Don't get me wrong, accents can be sexy!, but it's more like icing on the cake, not the cake itself.

Posted by: Daphne at August 18, 2007 1:13 AM

aishwarya rai is an incredibly overrated "beauty". she is the "favourite bollywood actress" of people who don't watch bollywood films. she is boooring and NOT "the most beautiful woman in the world".

Posted by: bleh at August 19, 2007 10:00 PM

"despite my score of 2 on the Kinsey scale"
Ha! I knew it! Too much gossip related and celebrity obsessed content for an author of this website to be a Kinsey-scale 0!

Posted by: Arthur Dent at August 22, 2007 10:37 AM

I don't know why they keep letting hack writers do scripts for Arthurian stories, there are so many excellent books on the subject that I would love to see turned into a (good) movie. Check out the Arthur trilogy by Mary Stewart, "The Crystal Cave", "The Hollow Hills" and "The last Enchantment", these are stories worth the legend and I think done right would make phenomenal movies. Plus she spent a lot of time researching all the legends and comes across as plausible and very realistic, and it involves all the history with the Romans.

Posted by: Songkla at August 23, 2007 11:48 AM

i bloody love pajiba. i started watching this yesterday, having never heard of it before either and came to a similar conclusion which went a bit like this...

me - 'gasp!'
other half - 'what?'
me - 'it's mr freaking d'arcy!'

2 seconds later....

me 'GASP!'
other half - 'what?'
me - 'HE'S GOT 4 CHINS!'

we didnt make it any further and now having read the spoiler, i'm very glad.

Posted by: sarah at August 23, 2007 12:10 PM

The comments here are much more entertaining than the film, probably, or the review. Dustin, sweetie, that gesundheit thing wasn't funny even the first time.

Also, it helps, when reviewing a film that bills itself as a historical epic, to make oneself aware of the history involved. But, as you say, the film is really a children's fantasy. What were they thinking?

Pardon me if I seem bitter. When CGI came in, I got all excited, thinking about the amazing true stories that could be brought to life, with relatively little cost.

Instead, we get Troy, The Crusades (which didn't totally stink, but near enough), and this bastardization. I guess there is no substitute for a good script, and some understanding of what makes the story interesting, as opposed to pandering to the lowest common denominator.

The result is that for a large majority of audiences, 300 is the gold standard of a "sword and sandals flick". I'd like to send out a big FUCK YOU, FILM MAKERS, for that.

Posted by: Janis at August 24, 2007 4:40 AM

Peter Mullan?

I'm so there!

Posted by: Jeff K at August 24, 2007 7:06 AM

I truly believe that after this stinking pile of dog poopy called a film, that Hollywood is cooking up a legendary/fact based film with two actors in the Colin Firth/Ben Kingsley model:

Look for "The Greek Philosopher's Stone", starring Hugh Grant and Anthony Hopkins
coming to a theater near you.

Posted by: samson at August 24, 2007 12:30 PM

When I saw the trailers for this I realized that it was going to be another history-on-crack remix of Arthurian legend. Just like that godawful movie with Kiera Knightly in it...Guenivere as a fucking pict. I remember watching that piece of crap with my (now ex)best friend, who thought it was GREAT...I couldn't stomach more than 5 minutes of it, kept pointing out all the inaccuracies, and finally ended up leaving the room 'for a snack'.

Posted by: uberinscrutable at August 25, 2007 1:10 PM

(the entire review)

.. WHAT?

...

No. Wait. WHAT?

Posted by: duckandcover at August 28, 2007 3:59 PM