free counter with statistics Lake House, The | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

lake.jpg
Do Not Try to Bend the Spoon

The Lake House / Dustin Rowles

Film Reviews | June 16, 2006 | Comments (52)


Way back in 1996, when college students used Pine to access their e-mail and Webcrawler was still the search engine du jour, I worked at my university library (in what would be the second of six jobs in which I’ve worked with Mr. Fox). As “weekend supervisor,” I had the run of the place, which meant I was allowed to leave the books to the work-study students while I cavorted with coeds in the library carrels. Unfortunately, on one of those many days that I abandoned my desk to wander the campus, I left myself logged into my Internet account. A friend and co-worker of mine, who may or may not have known the torture he’d inflict on me in the years to come, took advantage of that open account, and posted a message into the alt.sex.fetish.diapers bulletin board, under my name, suggesting that I liked being rocked to sleep and that I was looking for an “experienced male” who knew “how to change diapers like a midwife.”

Thanks to Garrett, many years later — out in the dating world — I frequently approached first dates with the kind of fear that Stephen Glass or Jayson Blair might have approached a call into their editor’s office, terrified that the post — which still floats around on the Internets today — would reveal me to be a Huggies fetishist. I basically had two options on these dates: 1) Assume the girl in question had seen the post (or would at a later time), and awkwardly try to explain that a misguided pal had posted it under my name many years prior, while she nodded and asked for the check, or 2) hope against all hope that she was a die-hard technophobe and would never discover my supposed fondness for baby diapers.

Clearly, if I had had the good fortune to date The Lake House’s Kate Forster (Sandra Bullock), I’d have never been presented with such a dilemma. Indeed, when you live in 2006 and miraculously fall in love with a man who still lives in 2004, apparently it would never occur to you to conduct a routine Google search to find out where the goddamn love of your life is living today. I’m all too willing to look past the whole “drop a postcard into Dr. Emmett Brown’s mailbox” premise, but if you’re going to rip off Frequency and cross it with motherfucking You’ve Got Mail, the least you could do is login to your AOL account and conduct a little background research to find out if Ted Logan is living a floor up above you now.

But then again, I suppose if Hollywood scriptwriters (or in this case, South Korean scribes) abided by the rules of logic and common sense, then we’d never be treated to pointless bullshit romantic sci-fi films like The Lake House, in which the only moments of amusement come when Keanu Reeves is asked to sneeze or cry onscreen — two actions that look remarkably similar when Neo is trying to sell his dramatic talents. Granted, I’ve been a fan of Reeves since he provided unheard-of levels of unintentional comedy in Kenneth Branagh’s Much Ado About Nothing, but Keanu’s talents do not run toward weepers, where his tears look about as natural as Ashlee Simpson’s new nose, and whatever chemistry he shared with Sandra Bullock in Speed was clearly eradicated when that bus fell below 55 miles an hour.

For those of you oblivious enough to time-travel formulas not to piece together the entire plot structure from a 30-second trailer, I’d suggest you stop reading here, lest I blow your mind with spoilers that would be obvious to even your average intellectually-impaired fan of Sandra Bullock flicks (and can you believe she’s been given the role of Harper Lee in this fall’s Infamous?).

The Lake House, adapted from the 2001 South Korean motion picture Siworae, tracks Alex Wyler (Reeves), who, in 2004, has just moved into a dilapidated structure designed by his father. There, he discovers a letter purportedly from the previous tenant asking him to forward her mail along, only he soon discovers that his previous tenant is actually a doctor, Kate, who is moving out of the lake house in 2006. Strangely, despite having relocated to a condo in Chicago, Kate continues to return to this mailbox out in the middle of nowhere to correspond with Alex, one of the many tiny illogicalities that nag at even the most patient moviegoer. Obviously, instead of alerting NASA to the time-traveling effects of this mailbox, Alex and Kate use this vessel to exchange 10th-grade pleasantries, like how much Kate “loves the smell of her dog’s paw.”

Without the assistance of Google, Alex also inadvertently runs into the 2004 Kate, whom he discovers has a boyfriend (Dylan Walsh), which doesn’t stop him from making the moves on her while we are all treated to an insipid tune off Carole King’s Tapestry album. Nevertheless, Alex doesn’t apprise Kate of the mailbox situation; but he does eventually set into motion the events that would put her in the lake house so that she might later leave the letter that put them together in the first place. (Seriously, Marty McFly would jump all over his ass for that.)

Meanwhile, the two also agree to meet in 2006, only Alex doesn’t show up. Why? Cold feet? No. Because he’s dead, people — a plot point that is shared with us within the first few minutes of the movie, so long as you are able to recognize the back of Keanu Reeve’s head after he’s been sideswiped by a bus. Knowing this, the rest of the film is almost a foregone conclusion. Will Kate discover that the man she is in love with is the very same fella that she painstakingly tried to revive from death only a few months prior? Will she ruin their “one chance” at meeting in order to save his life? And, more importantly, whatever happened to Dogstar, the only band that has ever earnestly failed at replicating the grunge sound?

I dunno, folks; even for those of you who feel that paying $10 for a movie ticket also means putting aside your critical faculties for a couple of hours, I’d have a difficult time believing that you could be won over by The Lake House. It may be one of the few movies that manages to be both completely obvious and outright unbelievable at the same time, and even Sandy — who I begrudgingly admit has some big-screen appeal — can’t sell platitudes straight out of a 10-year-old’s Father’s Day card. But the real travesty is that The Lake House was written by David Auburn, who has turned the credibility he built with his Pulitzer-Prize winning play, Proof, into a gig where is compelled to ask Keanu Reeves to convincingly deliver the following line without appending an ironic “Woah!”:

“She’s more real to me than anything I’ve ever known.”

And to that, I don’t even know what to say.

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. He lives in a blue house with his wife in a hippy colony/college town in upstate New York. You may email him, or leave a comment below.


Garfield: A Tale of Two Kitties | Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift, The



Comments

the lake house premise also sounds so incredibly similar to the audrey niffeneger novel the time traveller's wife. Or maybe the Niffeneger's best selling novel (bought by Pitt/Aniston Brad Grey's Plan B productions before being published) was a take off of the Korean movie that inspired the Lake House.

Posted by: Marie at June 16, 2006 4:31 PM

wow...sounds like just the pile of crap i expected

Posted by: joe at June 16, 2006 4:38 PM

Overall the film was guaranteed to suck very much ass. Not only as a romantic comedy it is doomed to failure (and I'm not sure why Hollywood studios continue to churn out these type of films on a consistent basis in hopes of replicating a When Harry Met Sally box office success), it has a totally ridiculous premise, that is, that two people who are two years apart are in love with each other...technologically speaking in 2004 you could have met...whatever...it was too dumb to even watch the previews, and neither Bullock or Reeves can act out of a paper bag...(ok Bullock is a smidge better, she always plays the same characters tho)...

Posted by: Gina at June 16, 2006 4:46 PM

I knew this movie would be a steaming pile the moment I heard Keane in the trailer. I love Keane, and I liked that song very much. LAST YEAR. I always feel like the music chosen for the televsion preview is an excellent way to judge the quality of a film.

Publisher's Note: Kitty X, you've now given me the opportunity to share my favorite all-time quote from the pages of Entertainment Weekly: "Keane is for those who find Coldplay's music a little too subversive."

It's one of those lines I always wished I'd come up with first.

Posted by: Kitty X at June 16, 2006 5:56 PM

Thanks, Dustin, for making me feel like a total moron. I worked through my Coldplay obsession some time during my third year of law school. Then they made a dance remix of "Clocks" and put it on some As Seen On TV Mix CD marketed towards 14-year-old girls who dream of one day going to Ibiza, and I knew I could never hold them in the highest esteem again. BTW, you owe my sweet ass a t-shirt . . .

Posted by: Kitty X at June 16, 2006 7:18 PM

When I frist read this premise in Premiere, I thought it could be interesting. Then, when I first starting watching all of the trailers (including that Keane song), I was starting to belive that Hollywood pulled one over my eyes. Thanks Pajiba for saving my time, my money, and my dinner from going all over the place after I've barfed it up.

Posted by: Robby at June 16, 2006 7:25 PM

I loved the original "Il Mare" (English Title), but this remake has been destined to suck. Just from the trailers, it looked like the film was prone to special effects for no other reason than they're expected. The original was a tear jerking drama of the highest order with no special effects and the twist (was it REALLY revealed in the opening??!?) was left at the very end. In fact, the original ending of the South Korean one was so downbeat that the filmmakers were obliged to tack on a happy ending. I usually stop the movie five minutes before the end so everything feels right. Depressing, but right. I urge everyone to go and watch the original. It's not hard to find.

Posted by: Terry at June 16, 2006 10:19 PM

Dude, no BS, I seriously LOL'ed at that Dogstar crack!

Posted by: Dover at June 17, 2006 1:18 AM

Thankfully, I'll manage to escape being dragged to this by my Keanu-obsessed friend. And seriously. Make it a short film. Google the bastard. Oop. Dead. The end.

Sandra Bullock killed off any goodwill I might've had leftover from previous movies with the Miss Congeniality sequel. What a pile that was.

Posted by: Mara at June 17, 2006 2:08 AM

If the Keanu from '04, meets the Keanu from '06, will it not open up the time space continuum, producing a Nexus, i.e. Star Trek First Contact, which will in turn destroy the matrix? Holy stinking pile of movie excrement Batman!

Posted by: C.J. at June 17, 2006 10:38 AM

I'm not even finished reading the review and I'm ctfu. You mean to tell me they never even explained that major plothole??? I love Pajiba.

Posted by: Candy at June 17, 2006 11:33 AM

Yeah yeah, it's so hip and funny to make fun of Keanu Reeves, one of the few movie stars that seems to not have a self-righteous stick up his ass cough*GeorgeClooney*cough.

Posted by: P.A. Jiba at June 17, 2006 1:18 PM

Please remember that Sandra Bullock lost her identity on the internet, and can not use it anymore. When you spend a whole movie whining about loosing your identity while surfing the internet, its bound to cause some types of phobias.

Posted by: Aaron at June 17, 2006 2:38 PM

I knew Keanu would be dead from looking at his picture on the billboard for the movie--he is super pale.

P.S. Keanu rules!! Have you all forgotten that he is the one?

Posted by: Whoa at June 17, 2006 8:12 PM

Well, I won't be spending my precious $10.75 on The Lake House, because of the exact plot hole you described -- it would drive me nuts.

However, I must stand up for Sandra Bullock. I love her. I absolutely love her in every movie she's ever made, INCLUDING Two If By Sea. She deserves the role of Harper Lee, and she will kick ass.

Posted by: Katie at June 17, 2006 9:50 PM

Since I don't plan on seeing this, I immediately went and read the spoiler then I went to imdb and I must tell you that people over there are highly confused about the movie. Highly.

Posted by: Candy at June 17, 2006 9:54 PM

Well, I saw it. Because, you know, every now and then I need a really cheesy movie. And wow, did it deliver the cheese. I should've brought crackers and some wine into the theatre.

But seriously, David Auburn wrote it? That's interesting...I can see a lot of those really bad lines (a lot of which happen to take on monologue forms) working better onstage.

Posted by: lexie at June 18, 2006 12:30 PM

Mr. Rowles, you hate everything, as I very well know. Which is why I chose not to read this review before heading to the theater.

I enjoyed the movie, but yeah, the whole "Why didn't she just Google him or at least look him up in the freaking phone book?" thing bothered me, too. However, I think it was meant to be an illustration of Kate's most emphasized character trait: "I seclude myself and prefer everything be kept at a distance."

This movie requires you to "buy the miracle," so to speak. The audience can't do that unless they see at least one supporting character doing the same. I think the director could have done a better job of showing us that.

I also felt the ending was missing something. Words, maybe?

But I didn't see this movie because I was expecting cinematic greatness. I went because I had some free time with the husband and wanted to see a romance, and maybe cry a little, while ogling Keanu Reeves. Mission accomplished.

Posted by: A Marine's Wife at June 19, 2006 12:54 AM

Every movie with Keanu Reeves in it makes me think of the scene at the end of Point Break where he looks Patrick Swayze in the eye and says, "vaya con dios, mi amigo". And then I spend the rest of the day laughing.

Posted by: Ben at June 19, 2006 1:14 AM

"Mr. Rowles, you hate everything, as I very well know. Which is why I chose not to read this review before heading to the theater."

That is SOOOO no true, he liked Wedding Crashers and Madea's Family Reunion (Author's Note: Hardly.) and Chronicles Of Narnia (for some reason), but most importantly you CAN NOT say anything bad about the man who admits a "heterosexual man-crush on Mr. Van Wilder"! Seriously, the only good thing in Blade: Trinity was Ryan Reynolds and the only guy who saw it was our dear Mr. Rowles: "Ryan Reynolds provides the comic relief in the form of the Jason Lee-esque, curse-filled, beautifully lame, one-liners delivered with well-timed and enthusiastic bravado. His inability to shut up while onscreen and his two scenes with Parker Posey are perhaps the film's finest moments". Good job Dustin, you're TOTALLY my kind of guy!

Posted by: irina at June 19, 2006 5:41 AM

Keanu? I thought he was an F B I AGENT!

Posted by: Helene at June 19, 2006 10:23 AM

Wow, what's with all the hating on Keane? Have you actually listened to their CD?

And I hate when people compare them to Coldplay... they're completely different. (For one thing, Keane doesn't even have a guitarist.)

Anyway, I like both, and I don't really see what either has to do with this suck-o excuse for a movie.

Posted by: d at June 19, 2006 11:13 AM

re: Sandra Bullock as Harper Lee in Infamous.

I was REALLY surprised too, but I've seen the movie (don't ask) and she's surprisingly talented in that role. I used to hate her, but I'm really excited for the release of Infamous. Toby Jones blows Phillip Seymour Hoffman out of the water

Posted by: j at June 19, 2006 11:19 AM

Thank you for publically recognising that Keanu Reeves was funny, funny, funny in Much Ado! I like to picture Kenneth Branagh directing that shot with his henchmen- 'Wait, cut. Right, the leather trousers AREN'T SEXY ENOUGH for the aggression in this scene. Keanu, get on the table, and Gary is going to massage you with oil as you deliver your hateful tirade against Claudio. Hateful, BUT SEXY.GO.'
Why was their oil? Why was Keanu so gruff? And why was Claudio played by someone who looked like Josh Hartnet but wasn't very good and over-articulated?
Having said, I love that movie. Especially when Kenneth Branagh does the splashy dance in the fountain, and Brian Blessed. AND Kenneth Branagh's beard semi-reconciled me to the idea of facial hair being attractive.
Lake House = looks really bad. What would make it better, maybe, would be a massage scene with some leather trousers...hmm...

Posted by: chaaamy at June 19, 2006 12:21 PM

"...he liked Madea's Family Reunion (Author's Note: Hardly.)"
Hehe, sorry about that. I just quoted from memory, but now I went back to the review and acknowledged the error of my ways. Please accept my most humble apologies, totally my bad on that one. Still a huge fan, though not one with a good memory... :)

Posted by: irina at June 19, 2006 12:40 PM

The really odd thing about this movie is that there is a far superior version of the 'magical letters across time' plot in the Hallmark Hall of Fame gem 'The Love Letter'. Starring Campbell Scott and Jennifer Jason Leigh. In that version, the guy is in the 1990s and the girl is in the 1860's and he bought her old desk at an antique shop. Thus, no annoyingly obvious Google option.

Posted by: karen at June 19, 2006 1:15 PM

I was just wandering, who hid the persuasion book under the floor? is it Bullock or Reeves?

Posted by: Joanne at June 19, 2006 10:49 PM

Dogstar....... that's funny. For all You Movie Buffs out there, I have a question. (Hope You don't mind the off-topic-ness) What the heck is with all these movies on DVD that have trailers/commercials that You have to sit through ?!?!?! I rent about 2 flix a year, and don't ever see me buying one, but what is up with that ? How can You stand for that crap?

Posted by: Rex Karz at June 20, 2006 12:21 AM

Rex, press menu on your dvd remote and it'll take you to the start screen. It is annoying but sometimes I watch it in case I see something I'd like to rent in the future.

Posted by: Candy at June 20, 2006 1:12 AM

I sometimes wonder if River Phoenix hadn't died if we'd not have the superstar version of Keanu Reevs that we're all forced to endure these days. I think him being in "My Own Private Idaho" w/River gave him a legitimacy he never deserved.

Posted by: chriso at June 20, 2006 1:48 AM

I'm almost glad they made this movie (which I will likely never see) just so you could write this hilarious review. Very enjoyable. 2 thumbs up.

Posted by: Hannah at June 20, 2006 9:49 AM

I am bereft, Dustin. I thought, surely this will be a decent weepy romance... But it seems it was not meant to be. I can't believe they didn't fill in the plotholes. It's so fucking easy to do, man -- one has only to watch the Rob Lowe scene in Thank You For Smoking wherein he leapfrogs over the problem of smoking in space with one line of dialogue: "Thank god we invented the blah blah machine..."

Ah, well. The older I get, the fewer great movies they make. Or was it always thus?

Here's a wee list of the films I've most enjoyed recently:

The Ballad of Jack and Rose -- disturbing, but endlessly fascinating.

Capote -- much better than I expected.

Breakfast on Pluto -- painful and poignant.

The White Countess -- painful and poignant.

Bee Season -- painful and poignant.

Everything is Illuminated -- alternately painful, poignant and hilarious.

And here's some stuff I hated:

Prime

Two for the Money

Red Eye

The Brothers Grimm

Casanova

Match Point

Bride and Prejudice

The Affair of the Necklace

The Weatherman

Broken Flowers

The Squid and the Whale

Most of the reasons for hating the above films are probably obvious, save the last two; those, I hated not so much for themselves as a whole, but for their lousy fucking endings. I also seem to be almost alone in the universe in loathing Match Point, and would just like to say here and now and for all time that it seems any film in which Scarlett Johanssen has more than six lines will almost certainly be permanently and irrevocably rendered sucky. The woman cannot fucking act.


(Exception: Good Company, wherein her wretchedness is ameliorated by the stellar performances of Dennis Quaid and that really good actor from that show about the 70s. Can't remember his name, more's the pity, because he is astonishingly good.)

I don't know why I felt compelled to share this with you all, but there it is.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at June 20, 2006 10:05 AM

I just had some hot cocoa & it's really watered down & crummy...much like this movie sounds. great review though, diaper lover.

Posted by: Misha at June 20, 2006 3:52 PM

I agree with you on most of the above, Maryscott, including Match Point. However, I have to throw Scar a bone in that I thought she was pretty good in both Ghost World and Girl With A Peal Earring. It was so weird to me that Girl and Lost in Translation came out at almost the same time. They both have very similar themes of hidden affinity/companionship/love. Lost was one of the most boring, cheesy, mildly racist (I mean, how much of the alleged "humour" revolved around the Japanese being short, silly, and not very adept at speaking English) movies that I have seen in a long time. Nothing happened, ever! And Girl was a beautifully filmed, well-written, truly interesting historical drama with a lot of accurate detail. And it went out with barely a whimper. Sad.

Posted by: MaiGirl at June 20, 2006 3:59 PM

I don't know what's with my typing lately. That's "humor." I am so not British!

Posted by: MaiGirl at June 20, 2006 4:01 PM

Awww... You had me at "Pine".
Sweet memories... (Sniff sniff)

Posted by: Scott at June 20, 2006 4:42 PM

Maryscott, you're thinking of In Good Company with Scarlett Johansson and Topher Grace with Dennis Quaid as the father.

Posted by: duckandcover at June 20, 2006 6:06 PM

When will Keanu FINALLY be nominated for that much deserved oscar?

- My Daily Zen.com

Posted by: Master Zen at June 20, 2006 6:52 PM

Maryccott,
I'm TOTALLY with you on Match Point. I figured it was because I'm not a Woody Allen fan (I hear his good stuff was before my time), and I have no interest in watching his earlier films (I have no doubt I'll be called an idiot with no education for this comment). Scarlett was useless in the movie, but she's kind of overrated anyway, IMO.

Posted by: Daphne at June 20, 2006 11:46 PM

Ya know what? I saw this last night and I LIKED it.

Yes, there are plot holes big enough to drive a howitzer through, but I enjoyed it. I was not looking for deep. I was not looking for profound. I wanted a warm and fuzzy, pink slipper kind of movie and that is exactly what I got.

The acting was decent. Keanu only gave one totally cringe worthy line delivery in the entire movie. Sandra gave a bit of a one note performance, but her banter with Keanu did elicit a few chuckles (particularily at the 'I can't believe we just had our first fight.' line.) Ebon Moss-Bachrach constantly looked like he was about to burst into tears, which got annoying but besides that, the supporting cast was solid.

Besides, Christopher Plummer was in it and he always adds a touch of class to any proceeding.

So, if you want something that will engage your critical capacities, take your Delorean to the drive in. If you want something that will tug on the heartstrings a little bit, go see this movie.

Posted by: Catboreal at June 22, 2006 5:58 PM

bravo Daphne. I hate Woody Allen too. and Stanley Kubrick and David Lynch (except Twin Peaks) i have not seen Matchpoint, but I am sure I will (i bravo Daphne. I hate Woody Allen too. and Stanley Kubrick and David Lynch (except Twin Peaks) i have not seen Matchpoint, but I am sure I will (i

Posted by: briana at June 22, 2006 10:48 PM

love scarlett) is woody in it? his writing is not so bad, but to listen to him shamelessly congratulating himself for being so brilliant for two hours is just fucking excruciating. even the review for the Lakehouse was forgettable (no offense Dustin) i wouldn't waste my time with the movie.


....sorry i used a less than sign to make a heart and it cut off.... love scarlett) is woody in it? his writing is not so bad, but to listen to him shamelessly congratulating himself for being so brilliant for two hours is just fucking excruciating. even the review for the Lakehouse was forgettable (no offense Dustin) i wouldn't waste my time with the movie.


....sorry i used a less than sign to make a heart and it cut off....

Posted by: briana at June 22, 2006 11:05 PM

As soon as I saw the trailer and who was in the movie I was begging that when the title came up it wouldn't be The Time Traveler's Wife (and what a half assed version). I've nver liked either one's acting, though Bullock's is perhaps, slightly better. I just love that book, I'm so glad that's not it.

Posted by: Camille at June 23, 2006 10:26 PM

You didn't like The Squid and the Whale?? come on, that movie is like a long, steamy makeout session with a vampire. A hot vampire. It hurts, but it's worth it. And the ending was somewhat abrupt but I liked it because you see just enough to know that he's not colorblind anymore-- he can see the true colors of his father and mother. Great movie.

P.S. Keane is great if you're babysitting a 2 year old who won't go to sleep. And Coldplay can easily sedate a roomful of snippy middle aged women. All crap can serve some purpose!

Posted by: Javelin at June 30, 2006 4:56 AM

The Lake House is one of the best movies I have ever seen. The LOSER who wrote bad things about it has a huge problem. Keanu Reeves is a great actor. Sandra is a great actress.

Posted by: Smiley at July 2, 2006 8:15 PM

Wow, loved the movie! And if you really think about the story, then there is only one "plot hole". Something with the dog...

Posted by: yet at July 24, 2006 11:19 AM

Hey do any of you guys know what song that is when the trailer first starts playing.. its not the keane song.. its like an acoustic or somthing..

thankyou

Posted by: Steven at July 26, 2006 3:05 PM

I just saw it yesterday. So, yes, it has all those potholes, I agree, but DAMN, Keanu is HOT!!! Too bad his chemistry with Sandra from Speed is all gone.

Posted by: Cuca at September 10, 2006 8:09 PM

The Lake House is my favorite movie of all time! I can't believe everyone hated it this much!

Posted by: Elizabeth at September 24, 2006 7:49 PM

Its only a movie!
So suspend belief and enjoy a feel good film thats well acted and has great scenery.
And i personally wouldn't have a problem waiting 2 years for Sandra Bullock!

Posted by: Danny at February 22, 2007 7:03 AM

What was the quote that Alex underlined for Kate in the book he put under the floor boards ?

Posted by: Heather at May 27, 2007 5:18 PM

What was the quote that Alex underlined for Kate in the book he put under the floor boards ?

Posted by: Heather at May 27, 2007 5:18 PM