free counter with statistics La Vie en Rose | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

laVieEnRose.jpg


Eyes, Lungs and Histrionics

La Vie en Rose / Ranylt Richildis

Film Reviews | July 12, 2007 | Comments (37)


Here’s my shame: I watched my first-ever review assignment on insomnia-acid. Funny things happen to film, of course, when you’re four nights’ sleep-deprived; a slow movie becomes interminable, and a busy one capers like a drunken stoat. That hallucinogenic tinge which creeps into your field of vision when you haven’t had your REM sometimes adds a layer of funk that can enhance or corrupt the director’s intention. Editing, which on a normal and well-rested day comes off as merely energetic, can seem frenzied when you’re out of your head with fatigue. Flashing lights slap at your eyeballs, and gravelly actors’ voices lose their rounded gruff and morph into grating. The pound of bullets can wreck your psyche if you’re too far gone, and your overall judgment may or may not be impaired (let me get that out there right up front — this is a review on crack of a special kind).

Thankfully there weren’t too many bullets flying in La Vie en Rose (aka La Môme), the latest biopic about Edith Piaf, whom I would venture to say is one of France’s most recognizable exports, along with cheese, wine and dignity. Some of you Digital Age youngsters may not know her name or her face, but you’ve all heard her voice. It’s like the proverbial battalion of typing monkeys in search of Shakespeare: watch enough movies, see enough commercials, and sooner or later you’ll come across that voice looping through a soundtrack. To call Piaf the “Billie Holiday of France” — while immeasurably flattering — is to underestimate the dimension of her cultural footprint and the significance she has for three generations of compatriots. In some minds — and in some moods — Edith Piaf seems to embody France, or at least mid-twentieth-century Paris, and this goes perhaps even more for foreigners than it does for the French. One can barely imagine the Gallic sound of a street accordion without an overcoating of that particular voice.

Before he made La Vie en Rose, Olivier Dahan was the guy you called when you wanted a music video or a second-rate sequel to a first-rate action-thriller that had been directed by someone with fuller chops. The expected bag of tricks of such a director — over-eager editing and a surreal tinge — are part of the show, here, but they mostly work. Beyond Dahan’s impressionistic (his term) narrative style and the occasional tilted angle, I spied a film of substance that proves Dahan possesses that most elusive of directorial traits: versatility. And his cuts and tilts and somewhat Gilliam-ish production design conjure up that element of the grotesque which surrounded Piaf’s life; the more overt visual tricks are married to a script mature enough to bear said tricks along, for the most part. In other words, any visual indulgences that swerved off the screen at me (which, in my state, probably seemed more pronounced than they really were) reflected the film’s central subject and communicated Piafness. It may be Filmmaking 101, but Dahan’s at least figured out the basics of backdropping story and theme with appropriate images and techniques (I’m always amazed by how many directors neglect the metaphorical opportunities their medium — their very camera — affords them).

It is a biopic, of course, so expect the expected: childhood, transformation, denouement; the requisite montage accelerating our hero’s success; and dramatic moments rendered overdramatically, as if we may not recognize their import if they’re dialed down to a lower frequency. La Vie en Rose is bound to the convention of using flashbacks to tell a life story, but here the flashbacks aren’t sewn neatly into a stable book-ended frame — time swirls around, leaps ahead, and floats backwards while always managing to situate the viewer in Piaf’s storied teleology. Dahan hits most of the highlights: the spotty parenting of Piaf’s acrobat father and alcoholic/singer mother, her fostering by a procuress grandmother and a neurotically maternal whore named Titine, the temporary loss of her eyesight, her years as a busking pauper (only nominally more savory than her near-destitute childhood), her discovery and ascendance, a love affair, and the inevitable, existential wind-down as Piaf ails and evaluates her memories on a desultory deathbed. There are also a couple of remarkable omissions, however, including an entire marriage, and Piaf’s role in the French Resistance; in Dahan’s version of events, WWII and the Occupation are conspicuously absent — perhaps because they’re the only forces intense enough to upstage Edith Piaf herself, the way Dahan presents her.

The soul of the film is, in fact, the portrayal of Piaf which Dahan and his lead, Marion Cotillard, concocted with all their hearts. Cotillard may be familiar to readers who’ve seen Besson’s Taxi or Burton’s Big Fish, but chances are her presence here leans more towards unrecognizable, given the way she’s been made up to resemble Piaf and the way she’s adapted her voice, stance and mannerisms to suggest another being entirely, one who exists altogether in another age. Cotillard’s performance is exaggerated but apt (though it took me a while to realize this — dull synapses, and all). She pushes back with all her might against the expressionistic sets and the tragic action with her broad gestures and adamant voice; a lesser performance — a lesser actor — might have been lost in Dahan’s staging of Piaf’s turbulent history. It occurred to me only after the film was over that I had completely forgotten the woman onscreen was lip-synching every last song — Cotillard is that deep in her role, and she’s actually at her most believable when she’s portraying Piaf in her essential element, up on stage.

With eyes as big as her lungs, Piaf’s unique look and potent sound rescued her from the carnival that was her background — a carnival that Dahan represents literally as well as figuratively. The film even features a circus and a contortionist, and Piaf’s final stage performance at the Paris Olympia has Cotillard painted up clownishly with garish white face and red mouth. Deep in the background of the film’s bright dinginess can be found images of butterflies, reminding us that the scabby runt prowling the halls of a brothel after her bedtime will soon metamorphose into France’s most diminutive sweetheart, la môme piaf (literally, “the waif sparrow”). Her first public performance, in Dahan’s scheme, is La Marseillaise sung on a street-corner — how fitting that girl-Piaf sings France’s most recognizable tune, considering how woman-Piaf will one day own what is perhaps the country’s second most recognizable song, La vie en rose.

Dahan’s Piaf remains a staunch national signifier despite her disreputable origin, despite all the drugs and despite all the crying, collapsing and tantrums. Dahan registers Piaf’s impact best with a remarkable scene in which her onstage performance is muted outright, as if her singing voice were big enough to transcend the silence — it’s a voice you can almost see, and Cotillard carries it to us right through the screen. Dahan effectively makes his point that Piaf was unique, and his staging of Non, je ne regrette rien at the film’s end — the song I’d been waiting all movie to hear — is a right goosepimpler, regardless of how manipulated you may feel by the over-poignant memorializing. Strong performances, histrionic scenes, fab music and lots of pulsing color kept me awake, anyway, and somehow made the movie stick to my sleep-viscous mind.

Ranylt Richildis can be found sneezing in college libraries or dropping chalk in lecture halls. She’s somehow managed to squeeze in a film or two a day for the last decade.


Pajiba Love 07/11/07 | Rant by Chuck Palahniuk



Comments

Never heard of her.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at July 12, 2007 9:22 AM

This is a really, really great review, Ranylt. I had heard about this film, but had no interest in seeing it until I read this. You've converted me.

Posted by: Jerce at July 12, 2007 9:40 AM

One of my mom's prized possessions was a collection of Piaf's recordings.

We'd be driving down the Eisenhower with my mom belting out her songs at the top of her lungs, drawing out the French "r" as long as possible, to the amusement of my sister and I, who couldn't understand a single word of French.

This will have to be a rental, but I'm looking forward to watching it w/ mom.

Posted by: Stella at July 12, 2007 9:41 AM

This is at our local arthouse theater, which is strange as I live in Orlando the place where culture goes to die. I was interested in seeing it and now I just might! Good review Ranylt! And as a side note, I feel you on the insomnia. I have been battling it for the last couple of years. I finally went to the doctor who gave me a prescription and I fall asleep all druggy and floatly and I inevitably wake up for 1 hour exactly in the middle of the night. I just can't win.

Posted by: lyricalcatt at July 12, 2007 9:43 AM

Great Review!
My favorite part: Dahan's Piaf remains a staunch national signifier despite her disreputable origin, despite all the drugs and despite all the crying, collapsing and tantrums

Perfection.

Posted by: Constance at July 12, 2007 10:04 AM

Almost perfect review of a great movie. The impressionistic directing captured more than the person of Piaf, it captured the persona.

Ahem, BarbadoSlim, your comment is called an "admission against interest". See the movie, then you will understand who Piaf was and what she represents.

Posted by: rudy at July 12, 2007 10:21 AM

BarbadoSlim I certainly hope you're kidding! Not knowing Edith Piaf is like not knowing Sinatra...

This movie opened the 2007 DC Film Festival a couple of months ago (which is pretty arty and internaitonal for a full fortnight). I missed the movie but arrived at the party as folks got out of the theater. The best I can say is that people looked kind of shell shocked and grim..and then headed to the bar and dance floor. Hard.

In short this film is very very French- moody, grim, stoic, atmospheric and nostagalgic. It's too bad they glossed over WWII as France suffered so much during the occupation and Piaf's music was the soundtrack. Seems like a missed opportunity.

I'll probably NetFlix it.

Posted by: Amanda47 at July 12, 2007 11:05 AM

BarbadoSlim, you may not have heard OF her, but I am willing to bet that you have heard her. Also, nice review Ranylt, but it's BILLIE Holiday.

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at July 12, 2007 11:06 AM

I've been wanting to see this for a while now but no one will watch a musical with me. After reading this great review, I'll go by myself.

Posted by: Lex at July 12, 2007 11:17 AM

I saw this film last weekend and it was great. I whined a bit about having to see a movie I had to "read" but I thoroughly enjoyed it. And, I was a blubbering mess at the end during Piaf's final performance. I wish they'd put something in there about the Resistance but, all in all, it is definitely worth checking out if playing at an art house theatre near you.

Posted by: Michelle at July 12, 2007 11:56 AM

I saw this a few weeks ago and I have to say, you hit the nail on the head with this one. I was espsciall'y down with your description/assessment of Dahan's visuals and camera work. And truly, it was impossible to tell that Cotillard wasn't actually singing those songs herself. Brava.

Posted by: Rebecca at July 12, 2007 11:58 AM

how about a list of great 'Resistance' movies?

Goodness knows there have been some great ones made and the sheer diversity of countries represented would be really interesting to see.

Posted by: Stella at July 12, 2007 12:52 PM

I am so glad they are using Piaf's voice and allowing Cotillard to lip synch. You know if this has been a US production, it would have been a vanity project from some starlet to "sing" Piaf for us. If a film is intended to pay tribute to a phenomenal voice, then use that voice for Christ's sake (do you hear me Joachim Phoenix?). Unless they want to make a Judy Garland biopic with Rufus Wainwright, then I'll let it go.

Posted by: PaddyDog at July 12, 2007 1:09 PM

Joaquin.

Posted by: j at July 12, 2007 1:44 PM

Noted and corrected, but he still can't sing like Johnny Cash.

Posted by: PaddyDog at July 12, 2007 2:33 PM

Wonderful review.

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at July 12, 2007 3:09 PM

lyricalcatt: Same problem.

Ranylt: You shouldn't wait too long to do something, I'm a chronic insomnaic, and didn't realize after a point that I hadn't slept in five days. Then the hallucinations began, and I called everyone within my area code to save me scorpions on the wall, the giant spiders dropping egg sacks in my hair, and the electric eels swimming under my carpet. It was one of the scariest days of my life, and more than a year later all of my family members still watch my sleeping habits closely.

I enjoyed the review as well. Honestly, I had already kind of dismissed the film after frequently reading about the relentless portrayal of her histrionics and the blunt overstatement of what a damaged, badly-behaved woman she was. Also, I wasn't terribly interested in people justifying the fact that this stuff was sort of glorifed in another film, because this is what you must expect...FROM A GENIUS!!! And that the plebes must endure...FOR ART!!! I had heard similar things go on in VIVA CALLAS and COPYING BEETHOVEN, and that it's to their detriment. But if you say that it's more than a bunch of screeching setpieces held together by astounding triumph, I trust you.

Posted by: M at July 12, 2007 3:11 PM

Awesome work, Ranylt. I'm actually a fan of both Piaf and Holiday, so while I probably won't rush out to the theater to see this, it's definitely getting a rental.

And I hate to ask and broadcast my ignorance, but... how do you pronounce your name?

Posted by: TK at July 12, 2007 3:13 PM

God, I love this woman's music and her voice. I can somehow see the comparison between Billie Holiday and Piaf, but Billie Holiday has a completely different style and voice than Piaf, well at least to me she does. In any case, great review.

Posted by: Gigi Worthington at July 12, 2007 5:00 PM

Anne (in Reno) Nice catch. As a fan who knows better and as a spelling fanatic, my head hangs in shame. I've put in a request to the Pajiba monkeys for a wee fix-it.

TK RAN-ilt Rich-ILL-diss (messed-up ancient Welsh names, godbladdit...)

Everyone else Stop! You guys are giving me the warm 'n fuzzies when you're supposed to be handing me my tits in a sling.

Posted by: Ranylt at July 12, 2007 5:21 PM

Sorry, fresh out of slings. The review was lovely, and I am looking forward to seeing it if it ever comes to my local theater.

Posted by: bonnie at July 12, 2007 6:33 PM

When referring to those gruff actors' voices, I think you meant 'gravelly', not 'gravely', unless you meant to imply some kind of seriousness.

But, pedantry aside, great review. You actually elucidated some of the use of filmic technique, which in my opinion is sorely lacking in many reviews. This film's over the top lush style has drawn praise and criticism alike, but you evoked it well. I'm looking forward to seeing it more now.

You'd better get used to praise, unless your next review isn't up to par, in which case we'll happily tear you a new one.

Posted by: L2 at July 12, 2007 7:30 PM

Now, there'll be no tits in any slings on baby-Pajiba-birth-day!
Seriously though, I liked the review, even in spite of the lack of sleep. I agree w/ Jerce, you've sold me on seeing this now. And as a fan of Billie and Jeff Buckley (who evidently loved Piaf), I have sort of had her on my mental list-of-things-to-look-into-further for a while anyhow. So thanks and well done, madame.

p.s. to TK, thanks for asking about the name as I was wondering too. Until I saw it up top I had always assumed it was just a pseudonym. I guess with a name that unique, you don't need a pseudonym!

Posted by: GreenMyEyes at July 12, 2007 9:49 PM

a few of her songs are in the movie Bull Durham. ive had her on my ipod for about 2yrs cuz that is like my FAVORITE movie ever. best sports movie of ALL TIME.

Posted by: suzette at July 13, 2007 12:21 AM

Fantastic review! I love when I read a review of a film I've just seen and formed an opinion on and it makes me rethink certain scenes and now I want to watch it again!
I was bitterly disappointed they didn't even MENTION her work with the Resistance. She saved over 100 lives! How can you just skip that? I'm French, and she was seriously a heroine, not just the voice of our country. She really was more than just a star, and I felt this was a little demeaning.
And the *SPOILER*


...dead child thing? My friends and I argued over whether it was true, and I'm ashamed to admit that I was adamant that she did not have any children and that it was just a metaphor for all of her loss, as the girl was named Marcelle (s in Marcel the boxer) and the husband Louis (as in her father, Louis) and I had to come home and Wiki it and then hang my head in shame.

And TK; second time in as many days that I thnk you. Been wondering that for a while.
And Ranylt, HOORAY for using real names!

Posted by: isabelle at July 13, 2007 2:05 AM

Just a couple of things I wanted to mention, as a hopefully not too snooty French citoyenne.
1. I think Piaf's immediate association with France is mostly an overseas thing. I could be wrong, but there a few other singers, (largely unheard of outside of France), such as Barbara, née Monique Andrée Serf, who are easily as important to, and certainly as respected/ cherished by the French as Edith Piaf.
2. "la môme Piaf" doesn't mean "the waif Sparrow". It means "the Piaf kid", because of how short she was. A sparrow is a "moineau".
Great review, though.

Posted by: Gabrielle at July 13, 2007 12:59 PM

And the *SPOILER*

...dead child thing?

I didn't like that part. Surely having a child and then loosing it, is a big deal (even if Edith Piaf was 17 and it was probably an accident). Yet they tucked this whole episode into two minutes at the end of the film.

Ok sure it wasn't a straight linear biography, but still.

Posted by: ChrisD at July 13, 2007 2:13 PM

la môme Piaf" doesn't mean "the waif Sparrow". It means "the Piaf kid", because of how short she was. A sparrow is a "moineau".

Gabrielle - I would see the film, where they make the explicit point that "piaf" is a Normandy slang term for "sparrow"--perhaps no longer in current usage.

Posted by: Ranylt at July 13, 2007 6:50 PM

Aha. I stand corrected re "Piaf".
(But "môme" really is kid, not waif. Though if it's reference to her diminutive size, I guess that makes sense.)
Sorry about that.

Posted by: Gabrielle at July 13, 2007 7:47 PM

Gabrielle, that bugged me too. Mome is kid, not waif. Grr.
But then I'm always unhappy with French/English translations and subtitles. I drive all my friends crazy going, "well, that's not quite right..."
Tant pis. C'est la vie!

Posted by: isabelle at July 14, 2007 1:45 PM

To all of you saying you will wait for the rental: DON'T! This is a must see in a theatre. I was absolutely transfixed throughout this film, as I don't think I've been since seeing The Piano. It is everything a film can be, using the visual AND the narrative to tell the story. The flashbacks & flashforwards which are so hackneyed in other movies make perfect emotional sense. It is glorious. It doesn't matter if you've never heard of Edith Piaf. Go and learn something new. Cotillard is mesmerising. I actually came home and had to look up whether it was she who was singing.

I'd see it again.

Posted by: Esme at July 14, 2007 10:26 PM

Gabrielle, Isabelle

Take heart about the "mome" thing. I checked my Cassell's, which indeed includes "waif" under "mome" (along with "brat" and "urchin" and "kid"). As "waif" refers to size (in English, the adj. "waifish" applies to petite models), many have indeed translated "mome" as "waif" in _Piaf's_ case. I have seen it quite a few times.

I hope this satisfies. As a fluently bilingual anglo, I take great pain in getting such things right, because mistranslations bug me, too. :)

Posted by: Ranylt at July 15, 2007 5:56 PM

Ditto the praises on the review. Piaf was one of the greats. But the omission of the WWII years surprises me.

But I have to say...that QuizLaw picture of Michael Moore is so hilariously distracting.

Posted by: el barto at July 16, 2007 1:58 AM

I stopped reading this review as soon as I read the line that "dignity" was among "France's most recognizable exports".

Posted by: James S at July 16, 2007 3:16 PM

Ranylt,
Thank you. I concede.

James S,
Go back under your bridge and wait for billy goats to pass, will you? Thanks.

Posted by: isabelle at July 17, 2007 2:52 PM

Resisting... the.... warm.... fuzzies....

I'm embarking on a 5 day mini-marathon of late night screenings this week - I'm going to be beyond shattered by Tuesday but damn if that means I won't do it- this film is first on my list. I'm overjoyed at your sparkling review as I'm trying to balance out decent movies with absolute dross. Cross fingers.


(superb review by the way)

Posted by: Alex the Odd at July 18, 2007 4:50 PM

actually Gabrielle iut means little sparrow. she was so tiny she lookes like one and not simnply a kid, peopl have tendency to be a little more creative than that

Posted by: rio at July 22, 2007 11:40 PM