jumper3.jpg

I Ain’t the Worst That You’ve Seen

Jumper / Daniel Carlson

Film Reviews | February 15, 2008 | Comments (73)


Jumper is one of the more entertaining kids’ movies in a long time, and that’s because it only occasionally feels aimed at children. Director Doug Liman brings the same punch and impact to the action scenes that he did to The Bourne Identity and Mr. & Mrs. Smith, and the screenwriting team’s collective c.v. boasts some impressive genre titles: Simon Kinberg penned Liman’s Mr. & Mrs. Smith, David S. Goyer’s history includes Dark City and Batman Begins, and Jim Uhls was responsible for adapting Fight Club, of all things. But all that potential firepower feels squandered when held up next to the finished product that is Jumper, a moderately suspenseful and generally decent little hard sci-fi tale. The film is based on Steven Gould’s novel, and while Liman’s film is ultimately a success at what it is, it’s a little deflating to realize that it is, in fact, nothing more than a young adult novel come to life, as brimming with easy solutions to hard problems as anything the genre has to offer.

The films starts out, as many of the middling ones often do, with a voice-over narration to spell out the emotions that the child actors in the prologue aren’t quite gifted enough to convey on their own. Young David (Max Theriot) is a lonely high-school kid of maybe 15; it’s unclear, or maybe just skimmed over. His mom split when he was 5, and his alcoholic father (Michael Rooker) isn’t exactly the nurturing figure David needs. He’s in puppy love with Millie (Annasophia Robb) and frequently tormented by the school bully. One day, through a mishap it’s really not worth describing in detail, David figures out he can teleport himself by concentrating hard enough. His first jaunt lands him in the library, but through practice he figures out some of the ground rules, and his self-education is one of the film’s better sequences. The effects of David’s jumps can have a slightly damaging effect on the world around him, from the noise of air and matter being displaced when he travels to walls and furniture breaking with the impact of an unfocused jump. David runs away from home, starts using his power to rob banks and buy swanky New York apartments, and becomes a snotty twentysomething embodied by Hayden Christensen. It’s the mostly grown-up David who’s been doing the narration so far, lifelessly reciting the forgettable lines about being special and having it all.

David, however, is about to have a few bad days. He’s been robbing banks ever since he dropped out of high school, spending his days jumping around the world and picking up foreign women in bars before flitting back home for some surfing or nap time. But one day a man named Roland (Samuel L. Jackson) shows up at his apartment telling David that Roland has been tracking him for years, ever since he first started robbing and jumping. Roland traps David and keeps him from jumping by firing an electrically charged cable that wraps around David and prevents his brain from doing whatever it needs to do to teleport, which is another nice moment that doesn’t just take the premise for granted but actually explains it, deepens it a little, and gives it some ground rules. David’s superpower would make him unstoppable, but by slowly introducing greater limitations and risks, Liman et al. ground the story in some semblance of reality. It’s apparently the job of Roland and fellow operatives to rid the world of jumpers, hence the knife Roland pulls out and tries to use on David. David teleports around the apartment before freeing himself and escaping.

With no other options, he returns home to Ann Arbor, Michigan, where he reconnects with Millie (now played by Rachel Bilson), who’s grown into the kind of slender and blindly trusting girl right at home in stories like this one. She’s kind, hardworking, single, and has apparently been saving herself for David’s eventual return, which certainly speeds up their new relationship. They travel to Rome together, but David gets pulled back into trouble when he meets another jumper, Griffin (Jamie Bell), who sheds a little more light on Roland’s organization and what they’re after. Griffin and David get into a brawl with two of Roland’s pals, and the animated effects are often dizzying as they jump from spot to spot, bouncing back and forth and taking everything from people to cars along for the jumps.

And yet, for all its attempted scope, Jumper never quite shakes the feeling that it’s just a high-caliber kids’ flick, albeit one with better action than usual. The film exults in the juvenile fantasies of a protagonist who never grew out of them, and who can’t see using his power beyond his own gain. That in itself isn’t unusual; most superhero origin stories start with the main character as self-centered before some external catalyst causes them to adjust their worldview in light of greater human suffering. (E.g., Spider-Man’s transition from wrestling for money to saving the world as atonement for his complicity in his uncle’s death.) But David never changes from basically a bank-robbing punk who gets caught by the wrong people, and what’s more, he never thinks twice about it. The only time the filmmakers hint that David could do something more with his gift is when David catches part of a news report about people trapped in a flooded area after a hurricane, complete with a news anchor speculating that “it would take a miracle” to get to the victims. David promptly turns off the TV, jumps to London, and cruises for townies at a bar. David never gives the people a second thought, and like that, any potential for him to think beyond himself is out the window.

The rest of the film unfolds with the economy of pace Liman’s established in his earlier works and a dogged determination to remain mostly kid-friendly, as when David attempts to sell Griffin on the idea of joining forces to fight Roland by comparing them to a Marvel Team-Up (twice). Christensen is oddly perfect in the role: He’s handsome and affable, but he excels at being that kid that screwed up one too many times and has to face the music. There’s a moment in Jumper that’s almost reminiscent of Shattered Glass, when David finally has to come clean with Millie about his life, and you can almost hear him being dragged into honesty. But the best performance comes from Bell, who’s fantastic as the kind of rogue sidekick. For the most part, though, Jumper is stuck in the awkward place between being smart enough to know its gifts and too dumb to grow up. But for kids’ stuff, it’s pretty good.

Daniel Carlson is the managing editor of Pajiba and a low-level employee at a Hollywood industry magazine. You can visit his blog, Slowly Going Bald.









Spiderwick Chronicles | Say What One More Time













Comments

I still can't muster up the cash for a ticket at the theatre for this one.

Also. H.C. never bothered me as much as he does some people/fanboys.

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at February 15, 2008 7:36 PM

The book is by Steven Gould, not David.
It sounds like they destroyed the great story of the novel. Nothing about David's estranged mother or his pursuit of those that killed her? What a shame. I loved the novel because of the character of David. In the book he is not in the least shallow, and it sounds like the film has completely removed that.

Posted by: Adam C at February 15, 2008 7:46 PM

If you're in the mood for brainless, you could do worse than Mace Windu vs. Darth Vader, I suppose.

Posted by: Kris at February 15, 2008 7:53 PM

...through all of the trailers I've seen, I somehow missed that this was a movie aimed at young'uns? I honestly thought that it was a sci-fi action flick, that Samuel L. Jackson would get to do some serious ass-kicking. I'm confused now...

That said, I still think it sounds like an enjoyable way to waste an afternoon/evening, as long as I can get someone else to pay for me.

Posted by: That Girl at February 15, 2008 8:02 PM

I dont think I've ever seen such a wide reaching and relentless advertising campaign. This movie was everywhere, and for quite awhile. Initially the premise seemed strong, but the more I saw the more sour it became. Mostly because of Christensen, and partly because of Jackson's white hair.

I like Goyer, but he has one hell of a hell to dig himself out after the turd that was Blade Trinity.

Posted by: ian at February 15, 2008 8:03 PM

Ok, this movie's running 15% on Rotten Tomatoes, but your review wasn't that damning.

So now I'm totally confused.

Posted by: twig at February 15, 2008 8:09 PM

Ditto, That Girl. I see the ads for this plenty, but had no idea it was a kids movie. Weird. It doesn't look awful, but still no interest in seeing it.

Posted by: Gabs at February 15, 2008 8:22 PM

There's a comma up in my post that's supposed to be followed by the word "and."

Just needed to point that out.

I still can't believe that this is a kids' movie.

Posted by: That Girl at February 15, 2008 8:34 PM

So...if this is a kid flick, I take it this means Samuel Jackson does not utter a single "m*****f***** [insert verb or nown]"? Why did they cast Jackson if he doesn't get to say the word?

Posted by: True_Blue at February 15, 2008 8:56 PM

The whole "It's actually a kid's movie" theme in the review means that it's so weak that it comes off like a kid's movie- just with decent action. Not aimed at children, per se, but would be better for it.

Posted by: Revert at February 15, 2008 9:09 PM

Eh, sorry. Not really that interested. I was unimpressed by the trailer, and only have faith if I see this one on DVD.

Posted by: Kamakaze Feminist at February 15, 2008 9:19 PM

Well, Hayden Christensen is hot. I guess that warrants an eventual Netflixing.

Posted by: Kolby at February 15, 2008 9:30 PM

I hope his ass saved his star wars money.

Posted by: Pookie at February 15, 2008 9:50 PM

I saw it today and thought that it was wonderfully, amazingly stupid. Really, if you're going to see a bad movie, it should be like this one. Very little plot, very short, and both intentionally and unintentionally funny. The entire movie could have been Hayden Christensen and Jamie Bell driving around Japan and bitching at each other (and occasionally blowing things up) and I would have been happy.

Posted by: Claire at February 15, 2008 10:02 PM

I cannot forgive HC for pussifying Darth Vadar. That is, by definition, the Unforgivable Sin.

....therefore I cannot forgive it.

Forgive.

Posted by: domoarigato at February 15, 2008 10:21 PM

It was George Lucas who pussified Darth Vader. Don't shoot the messenger.

Posted by: Kris at February 15, 2008 10:55 PM

A kid's flick? But wait, one the previews suggests a scene between X-ensen and Bilson that seems slightly beyond the rating of G.

But whatever. Maybe the movie industry is starting reconcile the ratings system with the terrifying state that today's youth is growing into, thanks to the influence of media whoration and the likes of Napalm Vagina, Crispy Spears, and Rehab McGee (I don't know who Rehab McGee is. Honestly, it could be anyone)

My 4 year old niece is just one thong and a meth habit away from becoming Fergie.

Posted by: Verona at February 16, 2008 12:01 AM

I like Goyer, but he has one hell of a hell to dig himself out after the turd that was Blade Trinity.

All right, now, first of all, I think we're talking about "holes" to dig out of -- there's only so many hells -- and second of all, Jessica Biel fighting vampires with her iPod on (how stupid do you have to be to deprive yourself of 40% of your ambient senses in a shadowy guerilla-type battle?) and Ryan Reynolds spouting sexual bon mots to Vice Vampire Parker Posey could not possibly be a "turd." Okay, maybe an enjoyable turd that you're passing, not enduring someone else's. Come on! That was a fun movie.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at February 16, 2008 12:04 AM

Ryan Reynolds single-handedly saved Blade: Trinity.

You cannot have your ultimate evil villain go through the entire movie menacing only a)goths, b)babies and c)blind women and expect anyone to take that crap seriously.

(I also wondered about the tactical logic of that iPod thing a little.)

Posted by: twig at February 16, 2008 12:17 AM

You know what I hate about Jumper? It took the premise of a perfectly good YA sci-fi book, something that's rightfully won awards, and got rid of all the good parts and replaced them with Hollywood bullshit - and it's not even particularly original Hollywood bullshit.

The book is about a kid who's alone, utterly so, and who can't explain his powers, and has to make his way in the world without a compass and decide what he has to do. The movie is about how teleporting people have existed ALL THROUGHOUT HISTORY and there's a SECRET ORGANIZATION dedicated to fighting them and BATTLES ON THE MOON and so on. It's like some horrible cliche happened, and a producer read while he was snorting coke, scratched his combover, and yelled at his assistant to get him some hack writer to "fix this boring book and make it GLOW, baby."

It doesn't just add meaningless crap onto the novel's excellent premise, it actively fucks around with the source material to produce something worse.

Posted by: mightygodking at February 16, 2008 3:05 AM

It was George Lucas who pussified Darth Vader. Don't shoot the messenger.

Hear, hear. Kris. I'm not a huge fan of Christensen, but it wasn't his fault the second star wars trilogy blew chunks. Any more than it was Ewan McGregor's or any other actor.

I didn't realize this was a kid's flick from the trailer either. Sad. I loved "Go", I thought "Bourne" was pretty fine, but I was hugely bummed by "Mr and Mrs Smith". I'm filing Doug Liman in the saw drawer as David Fincher - lots of potential, but definitely needs the right project.

Posted by: dot at February 16, 2008 3:08 AM

How did I miss that this was a kids' movie?

Posted by: madrigalstar at February 16, 2008 5:23 AM

Am I the only person who totally thought Topher Grace was in this?

Posted by: Todd at February 16, 2008 7:05 AM

His mom split when he was 5

I do hope you mean his parents split, and not just his mom. ;)

Meh, this whole movie sounds like the kind of brainless, mildly entertaining flicks you put on on a boring Sunday afternoon. And I don't think it was intended to be anything more.

Posted by: Linda at February 16, 2008 7:24 AM

Linda - "split" also means leave, no?

Also, did I mention that I think Hayden Christensen is hot?

Posted by: Kolby at February 16, 2008 10:30 AM

That kinda sucks. I saw a few minutes of it on... I dunno TNT or Cartoon network or something, and it didn't look too bad.

I guess it's only saving grace now is the Jamie Bell dance montage and... Wha? There's no dancing?

Well fuck that then. On to day three of Vodkannukah...

Posted by: Skittimus Maximus at February 16, 2008 11:02 AM

Ditto the earlier comment that this is not necessarily a movie made for kids but with a plot and conflict resolution similar to those found in movies for children. C'mon people read a little better.

I don't find HC hot--just kinda whiny. I guess I need to shake the Anikin Skywalker image of him from my brain and give him another shot.

SkitMax--day 3 of Vodkannukah may find me with the Godfather (also known as the Godmother in some mixology books) Vodka/Amaretto on the rocks. mmmmm.... How many hours til boozethirty?

Posted by: wsapnin at February 16, 2008 11:45 AM

"Am I the only person who totally thought Topher Grace was in this?"

I would have preferred Topher to Hayden. And if Sam Jackson is not swearing I don't know why he was cast.

Posted by: greer at February 16, 2008 12:03 PM

Wake me when Dustin does a real-time review of "Newsies." That shit would make my year.

Posted by: Dingles at February 16, 2008 1:51 PM

And yet, for all its attempted scope, Jumper never quite shakes the feeling that it's just a high-caliber kids' flick

Oh.

So maybe I skimmed.

Posted by: Verona at February 16, 2008 2:01 PM

Add my name to the petition for a real-time Newsies review. Never before or since has a movie so gloriously shitty wormed its way so thoroughly into my heart.

Posted by: Smithy at February 16, 2008 2:14 PM

Did someone in here just call BLADE: TRINITY "fun"?

Wow, someone's looking to have their opinion-having license revoked.

Posted by: Case at February 16, 2008 3:02 PM

Blade:Trinity is fun, much in the same way that getting kicked in the ding dong is fun.

I've seen this trailer about 10-15 times, and it wasn't until I read this review that I realized that Darth Hayden was in it.

Posted by: TK at February 16, 2008 3:36 PM

You fuckers talking shit about Blade:Trinty, at least Blade didn't have no faggots in it.

Posted by: Pookie at February 16, 2008 4:21 PM

Pookie You fuckers talking shit about Blade:Trinty, at least Blade didn't have no faggots in it.
I couldn't agree more; lumps of meat in gravy really add gravitas to any movie they're in

Posted by: cockroach at February 16, 2008 5:02 PM

Listen cockroach, I don't know what no gravitas mean, don't be using no faggoty words.

Posted by: Pookie at February 16, 2008 6:28 PM

I saw this movie Friday night, and I have to say that i quite enjoyed it. I can't help but love any super hero movie in which the protagonist is truly neutral. Also the bad guys being religious was a touch that i can always appreciate.

The lack of moral grandstanding is something that's usually lacking in this genre, and it's something i wish they had the courage to do for Wanted (judging by the trailers it looks like the protagonist is going to be a run of the mill goody two-shoes, read the comic if you want to see him in all his evil glory).

Not the best movie I've ever seen, but a good 5 steps up from shitfests like AVP:R. Also just to clear up the worries about a Samuel L. Jackson movie without swearing: he never goes the full Mother F**ker, but he does swear quite a bit during the movie, and the violence is no less than could be expected (somewhere around spiderman).

Also i just have to say that the special effects in this film were amazing. Not to say they blew my mind or anything, but almost every shot had something in it, but almost the entire movie was seemless (on or two renders of full environments were a bit iffy). It made me wonder at how amazing modern technology really is.

Posted by: Chugga at February 16, 2008 6:48 PM

Aaah, what the hell, this thread has run its course, but after a fine bottle of some kind of wine I got on sale at a Rite-Aid store, I just wanna throw in my own shit, since I haven't been able to hook up (or on) for awhile.

Some of you might remember me, the long-time Diane Lane lover who waited so anxiously for the 'Untraceable' film that I ultimately refused to go see after the 'Jiba review. I respect these reviewers, & additionally they've made a noticeable difference in my selections of films I'd have never heard of otherwise. I'm goin' crazy with the Netflix thingy, saw 'Maxed Out' and 'The Wire' and 'Iraq War Uncovered' because of your reviews, and I've never been let down

NOW,
As Columbo would say (without the class or timing of the original Columbo), "S'cuse me, can I ask a question here?"

I saw a 10-15 second trailer of this on TV and could SWEAR I saw Diane Lane in about a half-a-microfibre-of-a-nanosecond before the end.. is she indeed in this pic??

The rest of you just calm your f**kin' asses down, holla at me with a nickname or whatevah if you got some complaint about my interruption, & I'll then I'll just quietly depart this vicinity without poppin' a well-deserved cap in yo ass if you don't fill me in right quick..

(sorry, I'm feelin' all 'Omar' cool tonight, just finished episode 11 of the recent season - damn, I've really come to love this series!)

Anyways, can't justify my own neglect of this film that seemed to come out of nowhere, so my fault there. And all these other cool stars? get out.

So back to Diane:

Am I wrong? 'Cause if I am, sorry to have interrupted, peeps, just looking for some info
(btw, get the dvd 'Fierce People' if you want to see this wonderful actress at her most luminescently, incandescently, indescribably pure classic motion-picture goddess beauty at her absolute prime, a part of what I assume is a straight-to-dvd effort done beatifully and in an overall really good film, directed by Griffin Dunne & w/ Donald Sutherland, who's absolutely cool in his own part. I highly recommend it).

Sorry to be that particularly jerky asshole who jumps in without regard to any others and shouts out inappropriately for stars who aren't in the movie reviews just read (like Pookie, I defend the first 'Blade' movie right up there w/ 'Evil Dead' - and dat's sayin' somethin' there- shit, some movies just defy crticism altogether)

So on with the shit, is my babe Diane innit or not???

Posted by: TMax at February 16, 2008 6:58 PM

I looked it up on imdb, and i Diane Lane is indeed in the movie. She plays the protagonist's mother.

Posted by: Chugga at February 16, 2008 8:30 PM

if Sam Jackson is not swearing I don't know why he was cast.

Got that right. I've always thought Samuel Jackson says "motherfucker" better than anyone else on earth. Seriously, the Star Wars prequels get at least fifty percent more enjoyable if you mentally insert that into every one of his lines.

"We must unravel the mystery of these Sith motherfuckers!"

Posted by: Todd at February 16, 2008 10:51 PM

I already mentioned this week that the third "Blade" was my favorite. Didn't *love* any of them, but yes, it was FUN.

Yes, Diane Lane is in "Jumper" but you don't know why for a while and it's not a bad twist.

And yes, "Jumper" was FUN. And not in that "oh it's idiotic but I had an idiotic good time" compromised way, it was a real gas to watch once it really started cooking. They do a lot with editing and sound so that your brain gets even more visual effects than are actually there. Crafty. But jump effect itself is fantastic. Gotta tip the hat to Alan Cumming's Nightcrawler, but this continues that fine tradition.

No, it's not literally a kids movie, not with one night stands and fuck words.

Oh will I ever hear the end of "Newsies"? I thought it was just some weird thing an old girlfriend and her roommate were into. Then I slowly realized it was so much bigger than that.

Posted by: Jay at February 16, 2008 11:34 PM

Aight, I hated HC in the Trilogy, but he plays one fantastic whinny little stuck up brat (See Life as a House and Shattered Glass). In Jumper, he actually played his part pretty well. But, if you think that it is February, and any really good movie is either waiting two months or was pushed up for Oscar Nods, then know you are going into this to pass an hour or two while turning your brain off. If you do that, it was a pretty decent movie. Nothing to write home about, but a good little flick to turn your brain off and enjoy. And ultimately, isn't that what movies are good for (among other things).

Posted by: Nico at February 17, 2008 7:31 AM

No fucking way I'm gonna pay to watch lameness personified aka Hayden "emoting means looking constipated and raising my voice like a little whiny bitch and I made Darth Vader emo" Christensen. NO. FUCKING. WAY.

Besides the other hipster looking douchebag in the promo for this is grating to listen to. FUCK HIM and FUCK THIS MOVIE.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 17, 2008 9:58 AM

on a completely unrelated note...

i didn't take part in the "song to get your freak on" comment diversion on Thursday because i honestly couldn't think of any music that i purposely put on to heighten arousal, so to speak. i have, on occasion used Otis or the Reverend Green to create a mood but not to actually get freaky to.

well, after an exhaustive weekend of research with the missus, i think i struck paydirt. Gotan Project's first album, La Revancha del Tango, has come out on top (all puns intended) as the clear champion.

start with track 2, Epoca, and just let the music take it from there. or, you can puff a bit of a j during the first song so by the time Epoca starts you'll be rearing to go. you won't be disappionted, i guarantee it.

honourable mentions to Kruder & Dorfmeister's The K&D Sessions (CD 1), and Black Sabbath's Paranoid (i know, i know- i was a little skeptical at first, too, especially considering the fact we were driving along a country road at the time, but halfway through War Pigs we realised we really needed to pull over. on a side note- it turns out that after about an hour's worth of driving, the hood of my Mitsubishi is warm enough for some outdoor winter fun.)

oh yeah, and Hayden Christensen is just a much to blame for turning Darth Vader into a pansy as George Lucas (may he rot in hell). As Nuremberg proved, "I was just following orders" is not an acceptable defense of one's actions.

Posted by: causaubon at February 17, 2008 10:37 AM

If I were Darth vader I'd be out in the galaxy fucking every bitch I could get my hands on. I woundn't be running around with an older man designing death stars.

Posted by: Pookie at February 17, 2008 2:21 PM

I love how, three years later from when plot details were coming out, that there's still this grumbling of "he became Darth Vader because of a GIRL?!?! How lame, man!!" I don't know, people hate that he wasn't friggin Damien and can't handle it.

Posted by: Jay at February 17, 2008 4:00 PM

we never expected him to be Damien. we expected him to be Lear, or Hamlet.

Lucas had said, from the very begining, that his plan/dream was to make the entire Star Wars saga, the tragedy and redemption of Anakin Skywalker. it was supposed to be epic.

having a hissy-fit over Natalie Portman does not a tragic hero make.


(although i am kinda sweet on Natalie Portman)

Posted by: causaubon at February 17, 2008 4:24 PM

I don't know, people hate that he wasn't friggin Damien and can't handle it.

Posted by: Jay at February 17, 2008 4:00 PM

--------------------------------------------------

Listen, I don't give rat's as if he wasn't Damien or what...ever. The problem is HIS ACTING SUCKED, get it? HE SUCKED, he had zero emotion, zero delivery. The script was idiotic? Yes, but SO WERE ALL OF THEM, all of them 'cept Empire. Lucas can't write worth a damn. This bitch just didn't even TRY to sell it. He's a fucking "actor"...ACT! bitch.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 17, 2008 4:54 PM

booyah!

Posted by: causaubon at February 17, 2008 4:59 PM

Well *that's* different, Slim, and you're entirely entitled to loathe his acting ability. The catch-all "Vader's a pussy" is what makes me roll my eyes. I thought his mother and wife dying were good emotional fuel for a violent break, and I buy it, but I've appreciated the meaning of that trilogy regardless of whether or not the execution was always up to snuff (ie. the Weimar-ness of the Old Republic)...and sometimes if definitely wasn't. Either way, I don't think the character itself was ruined and that I'll certainly stick to.

Posted by: Jay at February 17, 2008 5:01 PM

"We must unravel the mystery of these Sith motherfuckers!"

I just spewed coffee all over my computer screen. This is why you shouldn't read comments and drink at the same time.

Oh, and Dingles, you just made my day...a living hell. I love Newsies for some unknown reason and now I'm going to have that damn soundtrack on loop in my head for the rest of the day. Thanks.

Posted by: Kay at February 17, 2008 6:29 PM

Whoa, whoa, whoa....the Blade Trifecta is all GOLD! Anyone who says otherwise should immediately remove the stick from their ass.

Come on...*vampire dogs*!!!

Posted by: HallsyHatesU at February 17, 2008 6:30 PM

The what?

THE FORCE,

the WHAT?

*ignites lightsaber* say "what" one more time! THE FORCE MOTHERFUCKER? DO YOU WIELD IT!?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 17, 2008 6:39 PM

...BSlim, I know I probably shouldn't encourage you, but that made me feel all tingly inside.

I'm just going to sit here, dazed for a moment.

Posted by: That Girl at February 17, 2008 8:33 PM

Count me among the MANY who didn't know this is supposed to be a KIDDIE flick.

Jesus --- talk about marketing fuck-ups.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at February 17, 2008 8:37 PM

That does have a bit more zazz than "you're under arrest, Chancellor".

Posted by: Jay at February 17, 2008 9:40 PM

this movie is total crap.... useless film for the ADD generation

Posted by: maltinej at February 17, 2008 10:13 PM

That does have a bit more zazz than "you're under arrest, Chancellor".

Easy fix: "You're under arrest, motherfucker."

A few more:

To Anakin when confronting Palpatine: "Yes, he deserves to die, and I hope he burns in Hell!!!"

"What does Yoda look like? Does he look like a bitch?"

"Purple lightsaber. When you absolutely, positively got to kill every motherfucker in the room. Accept no substitutes."

Posted by: Vermillion at February 17, 2008 10:25 PM

While we're on the topic of Samuel L. Jackson's general badassery: he allegedly requested a purple lightsaber just for the hell of it. Not only did Lucas acquiesce, but there is now a whole lot of retroactive backstory about why Mace Windu has a purple lightsaber, just because Samuel L. Jackson wanted one.

I discovered this while researching lightsabers in order to answer the question: If a lightsaber were swung at Superman, would it affect him?

For the record, I say it would.

Posted by: That Girl at February 18, 2008 12:51 AM

Son, yer average Russkie don't take a dump without a backstory.

Oh, I mean....yes, George let him have it, thus it became canon, thus someone had to write down why. Every damn extra now has a name and a backstory and a planet. I still miss Hammerhead, Snaggletooth and Walrus Man though.

I *think* Bastila Shan's yellow is now official too, but as far as I know it's not appeared onscreen yet. But I digress.

And now you've just reminded me that no one knows when the hell another Superman movie will arrive. Dammit.

Posted by: Jay at February 18, 2008 1:15 AM

Mara Jade also wielded it an "off-color" saber, I think it was magenta. Well, at least she did, before they wasted her ass.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 18, 2008 7:42 AM

please disregard superfluous *it*

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 18, 2008 7:43 AM

"Purple lightsaber. When you absolutely, positively got to kill every motherfucker in the room. Accept no substitutes."

HA!

Posted by: Todd at February 18, 2008 8:02 AM

I discovered this while researching lightsabers in order to answer the question: If a lightsaber were swung at Superman, would it affect him?

For the record, I say it would.

Posted by: That Girl at February 18, 2008 12:51 AM


Long time listener, first time caller. I just had to note that I wasn't sure of the answer to this question, so I asked the 8 year old Lizardspawn. According to him Superman would be affected somewhat by the lightsaber, but not killed. This is because the lightsaber contains "a teensy bit of kryptonite, among other things". Apparently Gus Gorman sits on the lightsaber board of engineers.

Posted by: Lizardqueen at February 18, 2008 12:25 PM

Well, Lizardqueen, since kryptonite is present in the lightsaber, a well-placed blow could prove fatal. Although I'm sure it would take a miracle for a Jedi to get through the hurricane breath, heat vision, super-speed, super-strength, flight, and the super-elasticity of Supes underpants.

Posted by: ScarletKnight at February 18, 2008 1:40 PM

Thanks for the Van Halen reference. It was just clever enough to make me smile.

Posted by: Brian at February 18, 2008 2:22 PM

I hated this movie. I fell asleep after dummy Bilson made the 2nd or 3rd reference to his flunking Algebra, so he could not be in banking.
I woke up at the credits. At least I got a good nap.

Posted by: debi at February 18, 2008 4:44 PM

I don't know. For me you couldn't find more 'meh' actors for this than HC and Rachel Bilson - it was light and fluffy and about as deep as a Neutragena commercial. I hoped to like RB, but she kinda disappointed me with her run on Chuck (never watched the OC) and this certainly hasn't improved my opinion. I kept thinking how much fun this would be if they got Jason Bourne and Maria Kruetz... wishful thinking, I know.

I did like the special effects, especially the electric boogaloo wand thingy...but, c'mon, PALADINS???? Talk about a streeeetch to get that to fit... huh? You might as well call them Crusaders for that to make sense. Were paladins in the book?

The only paladin I know is the one I play on WoW and she'd eat HC for breakfast. Hammer of Justice FTW!

Posted by: Stella at February 18, 2008 4:46 PM

Re: Blade: Trinity

Jessica Biel as a superhero. Worked for me. See also Stealth. She's getting cast in girl flicks and Adam Sandler flicks. This must stop.

She still has at least three serious Warrior Goddess movies in her and she needs to get on with it.

Posted by: Meander at February 18, 2008 5:13 PM

I think calling this a kid's movie is going a bit too far. They took a young adult book and tried to broaden the scope of the audience for film. They did remove a lot of the character development and the mother plot was changed as a means to justify a sequel. But that's Hollywood for you.

The plot was thin. But this was really a plot created to surround a premise, teleportation, rather than the other way around. The acting was good in parts, a bit bland (HC) in others. The action and effects were well above average. They kept it short (about 90 minutes) and didn't try to make the move too deep. Overall, it was enjoyable. If it continues to do well, I would expect to see a sequel with some of the original cast. If it does OK, expect something along the lines of Butterfly Effect 2 and never go see it.

Posted by: altan at February 19, 2008 1:21 PM

All you need to know about the futility of Hayden Christian-anderson's performance is that the Anakin/Darth Vader character gained infinite dramatic depth with the addition of an immobile mask and someone else's voice. Just picture HC voicing the line "The plan has been altered, pray I don't alter it further." We needed to see Anakin express far more malevolence (rather than petulance) to bridge the character to the Mr. Joshua of the Empire.

Posted by: denadn03 at February 19, 2008 4:05 PM

I saw this movie last night and I really wish I'd known it was a kids movie. Because if I'd known it was designed for 12 year olds, I would have lowered my expectations and not been so bitter about $10 wasted. I felt like the director was just throwing all the special effects at us so we'd have one tiny little thing to like about it. The concept was interesting, and I kinda liked the protagonist, but... it just fell apart.
Which is why I'm not surpised to learn it was based on a book. I got that icky tingle midway through that made me suspect a decent book had, once again, be severely ass-raped by Hollywood.

Posted by: Fleur at February 20, 2008 4:19 AM

Uh, Rachel Bilson was clearly much more of a horrible actress than Hayden, if you are ignorant enough to call his acting style poor acting.

She's homely, overly thin, was terrible on the OC, and reinforced the insipid nature of this movie.

Also- the sexscene is ridiculously appropriate. It's grossly idiotic. Worst I've ever seen.

Posted by: Cheyney at February 27, 2008 12:18 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time