jackass.jpg
The Tortured Soul of a Jackass

Jackass: Number Two / Dustin Rowles

Film Reviews | October 14, 2006 | Comments (108)


There’s a scene in Johnny Knoxville’s latest documentary, Jackass: Number Two — a gritty, urbane examination of the post-adolescent retardation of men in their late 20s/early 30s — that involves a container of horse ejaculate. I’m reluctant to disclose the details, mindful as I am about revealing the fine intricacies and schematics of the Jackass plotline, but there’s an almost undeniable hidden metaphor in that half-bottle of prostatic fluid, and what the bearded jackass (Chris Pontius) and Mr. Knoxville — who turned in a literally haunting performance as Luke Duke in last year’s Dukes of Hazzard — do with the equine spunk provides a suitable distillation of the movie as a whole, propelling the narrative undertones to another, more complex stratum. It’s probably obvious to anyone, but what the director, Jeff Tremaine (who in addition to the Jackass films, also directed their sublime precursor, Boob), is trying to essentiate with in this particular vignette is that the three leads — Knoxville, Steve-O, and Bam Margera — really, profoundly want to fuck each other. On a chair. In the backseat of a Volkswagen Bug. In a library carrel. Or against a rock. Wherever. It doesn’t really matter, just so long as there is penetration involved.

But what’s made clear when Knoxville and Pontius drink the horse’s spooge (oops — sorry, I didn’t mean to ruin it for you) is that in a society still driven by the Christian right and red-state morality, 30-year-old men with wives, girlfriends, and masculine reputations to uphold still cannot whip out the lubricant and give in to their primal urge to slip it into the backdoor. And unfortunately for these poor, subdued men — two of whom have children — the only real outlet for the repressed sexual frustration is to drink the ejaculate of a horse, or stand around in the nude and inflict pain on one another, while anointing the appropriately named Wee Man as their phallic mascot. It’s a cheerless state of affairs —nearly a year after Jake Gyllenhaal and Heath Ledger mainstreamed man-love into our cultural zeitgeist — that this group of men still must play with poisonous snakes in lieu of one another’s sexual members or, worse still, substitute the goring of a bull’s horn for the feel of a man.

There are other critics, mostly middle-aged white men who write for print publications, who fail to understand the plight of the Jackass crew. They unfairly decry both this movie, the original Jackass film, and the television series (yes, there is that much pent-up sexual frustration) as the beginnings of the moral bankruptcy of America, presaging a time when the profundity in our pop-culture landscape will erode into nothing but a series of blows to the groin. I cannot buy into that sentiment. Clearly, these critics’ minds have been so addled by decades of Scorsese, De Palma, and Spielberg that they can no longer recognize the significance of a grown man who would literally deign to eat horse shit — such an act is unmistakably tied to one’s inability to progress beyond Freud’s anal stage, providing ample subtext to the film’s homoerotic overtures.

But is Jackass 2 funny? In a word: Yes. In fact, if it weren’t so hilarious, it’d be outright heartbreaking. And rather than being derided by critics, Mr. Tremaine should be applauded for elucidating so clearly the sexual-identity crises bubbling beneath the surface of so-called “frat-boy” America. Like the men of Jackass, millions of fraternity brethren must spend their weekends with Greek letters affixed to their chests, self-destructively drinking themselves well past the point of inebriation simply to cope with the psychological torture of having to share a room with an attractive floppy-haired collegiate with a popped collar. Borne out of those frustrations were the almost paganistic hazing rituals of fraternities, the circle-jerks, and the alcohol-fueled self-punishment and humiliation that Knoxville, et al., have simply filmed and turned into a snuff-like form of entertainment, billed as “low-brow” to those not in the know.

But we know, Mr. Knoxville, Mr. Margera, Mr. O, and Mr. Wee. We know that no one who wasn’t experiencing a great deal of emotional conflict would anchor a fish-hook into a cheek and swim with a school of deadly sharks. We know that you would not punch a bear trap unless you were trying in vain to stifle a great deal of rage. We know that you wouldn’t play with an anaconda in a tank full of balls unless they were metaphors for what you cannot have. And we know that no one who wasn’t crying on the inside just a little would rocket-propel themselves over an ocean, unmindful of the dangers of death, unless some part of him longed for an afterlife where he were free to love whomever he would, in any uninhibited manner he chose. And certainly, nothing even need be said of the segment entitled, “The Butt Chug.”

By and large, the intended audience for Jackass: Number Two will miss the not-so-subtle implications of the film. Most will be too busy wiping away the cherry-flavored Icee spewing forth from their nostrils to recognize the emotional ache underlying the series of stunts — there were times, in fact, when this critic was so overcome with sick, adolescent joy that I, too, forgot what the film was really about. And that’s the real genius of Jackass: Number 2 — the message, undoubtedly, will filter down into the infantile subconscious of America. And little by little, these Jackasses will chip away at our collective prejudices. And when this group of “merry pranksters,” closing in on their 40s, makes a third or a fourth installment and someone finally succumbs to a painful, tragic demise, we may finally understand that lying beneath the goofy grins and perpetually unclothed torsos of these men are tortured souls begging to be set free. And once we realize the sacrifice he is willing to make for his art, maybe — just maybe — we will finally recognize that there is nothing at all wrong with one man’s love of another.

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. He lives in a blue house with his wife in a hippie colony/college town in upstate New York. You may email him, or leave a comment below.


Man of the Year | Shortbus





Comments

Brilliance. Sheer, unadulterated brilliance.

Posted by: Kate at September 22, 2006 3:19 PM

Wow, Dustin. I'm pretty much speechless. All I can do is remember this one VH1 special about the "mainstreaming" of homosexuality a few years ago, and think about how John Cameron Mitchell was talking about how "Jackass" is the gayest show on TV: "Next on Jackass--Johnny Knoxville gives it to Steve-O up the ass".

However, I'm guessing it will be a while until we see Johnny clutching a blood (and in this case, horse-splooge)-stained shirt while crying, eh?

Posted by: em at September 22, 2006 3:22 PM

I like the part where Bam cries.

Posted by: Christine's Boytoy at September 22, 2006 3:29 PM

You don't hear about illegal immigrants from Asia...

But Asians have been known flavor their meals with Soy Sauce.

And Soy is Spanish for "I am"

And Mexicans have been known to work in fields harvesting soy beans.

THINK ABOUT IT. There's a connection

Posted by: Christine's Boytoy at September 22, 2006 3:31 PM

I can't imagine the movie being any better than that.

-M

Posted by: wolfy at September 22, 2006 3:37 PM

Fabulous insight, Dustin. Answers the question as to why Knoxville eagerly returned to the Jackass genre when he previously said he was done with all that. And with the same people! It's like going back to old lovers you just can't quit thinking about. What about recruiting a new generation of Jackasses, Johnny?

Posted by: wavemaven at September 22, 2006 3:56 PM

"Borne out of those frustrations were the almost paganistic hazing rituals of fraternities, the jerk-circles, and the alcohol-fueled self-punishment and humiliation that Knoxville, et. al., have simply filmed and turned into a snuff-like form of entertainment, billed as "low-brow" to those not in the know."
i really, really wish i'd written that.

Posted by: Keith at September 22, 2006 4:00 PM

Wow, Mr. Rowles. You have once again used your telescopic eye to penetrate deep into the ethos of a particular film and deduce from what you see a picture's most intricate truth. I applaud you, yet again.

man those guys are gays. I despise that bam margera child. another great example of dicks becoming famous.

funny funny shit, though.

Posted by: Dmo at September 22, 2006 4:15 PM

Somehow I'm not seeing any irony in what you're saying. I guess I'll drop you as a trust-worthy critic, since I don't know what to make of this.

So to summarize, you are saying that Jackass is art? Damn, then Johny Knoxville may be the next Warhol. I guess America is not morally bankrupt, it's just intellectually bankrupt, and I don't really know which one is worse.

BTW if you're gonna bitch about my use of the English language, please consider I was born (and still live) in Guatemala.

Posted by: Steve at September 22, 2006 4:25 PM

... You're kidding right?

Posted by: Maria at September 22, 2006 4:31 PM

NEVER let it be said that film criticism cannot be an art unto itself. You have thoroughly disproved that terminological inexactitude

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at September 22, 2006 4:44 PM

Best. Review. Ever.

"...millions of fraternity brethren must spend their weekends with Greek letters affixed to their chests, self-destructively drinking themselves well past the point of inebriation simply to cope with the psychological torture of having to share a room with an attractive floppy-haired collegiate with a popped collar."

The single most brilliant summation of contemporary collegiate lifestyle.

Posted by: Bridget at September 22, 2006 4:52 PM

Dustin, you're a genius. I truly don't think I've thought of the Jackass genre in that way. It all fits, now - particularly Johnny Knoxville having an affair with Jessica Simpson of the big boobs and copious blonde hair. "I'm straight - see? Look at me - I'm having sex with Jessica Simpson!"

Posted by: Samantha T at September 22, 2006 5:00 PM

I too was grinning the entire way through this review. Is there a word for something that is at once ironic and sincere? There are times, I swear to god, when the camera cathes a fading grin on the face of one of the Jackasses, and you can read the "who am I and what the fuck am I doing?" sentiment behind the manic, juvenile exterior. Also, thank you for pointing out the incredible amount of latent homoeroticism that courses through that group. I am totally convinced that Pontius and Steve-O have fucked based on what I saw of Wildboys.

Posted by: Charlie at September 22, 2006 5:02 PM

Are you gay? Because a gay friend of mine tried to flip our conversation into something similar to what you've wrote. He wanted to get into my pants.

Posted by: ricehead at September 22, 2006 5:25 PM

Oh, that just made my day! Now it all make sense. Thanks Mr Rowles.

Posted by: Yo at September 22, 2006 6:23 PM

I don't remember a time when I've been so in awe of the pure genius that was this review. Poetic.

Although, I find it hard to reconcile the fact that I just described a piece of writing that references horse ejaculate as poetry.

Sigh.

Still, I bow before your brilliance sir.

Posted by: Dustinwillyoumarryme? at September 22, 2006 6:41 PM

I have to add my own admiration and congratulations for your putting your finger on the true tragedy of the White American Male.

(But I just hate to think of Johnny Knoxville as a closet case...Am I perverted for wanting to fuck Johnny Knoxville? Is it wrong of me to want that strangely disproportioned, reptilian body crawling over mine? To dream of clamping that sardonic go-to-hell grin between my thighs? Do other females have these dirty, dirty thoughts?)

Posted by: Jerce at September 22, 2006 7:28 PM

I've been a regular on this site for some time now, and I must say that this review captures what brought me back to this site for the second time. Hilarious and genius. Thanks.

Posted by: Kitty X at September 22, 2006 7:28 PM

Bless you for having the balls to say what we all thing. Simply wonderful.

Posted by: MaiGirl at September 22, 2006 7:33 PM

I meant, "think." But you all knew that.

Posted by: MaiGirl at September 22, 2006 7:36 PM

Just two days ago I was predicting to a friend that the next Jackass movie will be "Jackass: The Man Porn" and that it will climax with, well, a group climax. He didn't quite see where I was coming from and now he thinks I'm a huge pervert.
I can't wait to show him this review.

Posted by: missmle at September 22, 2006 7:48 PM

Jerce, yes. Steve, no.

Posted by: Anne at September 22, 2006 8:46 PM

Sorry to break up the party, but I think your take on 'Jackass' is totally wrongheaded. Shouldn't you be celebrating these guys? As goofed-up and stupid as their actions are, aren't they, after all, heterosexual men who are unafraid of homosexuality? If you asked them about gays, don't you think they'd say, "Well, it's not what I'm in to, but I don't have a problem with it"? As puerile as their stunts are, would you expect any of them to line up to vote down the rights of homosexuals? Do you expect them to go gay-bashing when they all explicitly or implicitly recognize the ambiguity of sexuality? (Having said that, I would also say--sorry boys--not every man who makes a "gay joke" is a closeted homosexual. If you honestly believe that every man who gets drunk or does something stupid, does it because he secretly wants to screw you, then you have a fairly narrow-minded view of sexuality). In your own effort to prove the complexity of human sexuality, you've actually stated the opposite: every man who doesn't act like a fag, is, in fact, a fag. Sounds like projection to me.

Posted by: JMM at September 22, 2006 9:10 PM

So, in lieu of a well-reasoned review, you called them gay. And tried to pass it off as progressive. And apparently most of the people on this message board bought it. Sigh.

Are you in fact suggesting that the entire jackass crew are closeted homosexuals? If that is true, is it anything to be smug about? I'm actually shocked at how many reviews refer to this film as homoerotic, given that there's nothing there that would turn on any self-respecting gay man. I find frat-boy antics as boring as most people, but have we moved from calling them "stupid" to "gay"? Is all this language just schoolyard insults dressed-up in references to Freud?

I was with you when you were making fun of Knoxville, but at the end when you tried to play the "a change is gonna come" card, I threw up in my mouth a little. Please please please do not try to dress up a bitchy review as an act of social conscience.

Posted by: the classical! at September 22, 2006 9:32 PM

I think I love you.


That was fucking beautiful, my friend. That was just fucking beautiful!

Posted by: anaxa at September 22, 2006 9:43 PM

Classical! and JMM

Are you serious? Do you actually take this review on its face? Haven't you ever heard of HYPERBOLE. I'm sure that the reviewer is not actually suggesting that JK or BM are really gay or that the film is making a real social statement. He's having a laugh at their expense. Get the giant, self-righteous sticks out of your asses.

Posted by: Lucinda81 at September 22, 2006 9:47 PM

This review was so good I almost cried.

But I didn't, because I was too busy KICKING MYSELF for not realizing this before.

OF COURSE they're gay. In the first Jackass, one of the guys stuck a car UP HIS ASS. But not before putting the car into a LUBED-UP CONDOM. COME ON.

Posted by: Natalie at September 22, 2006 9:49 PM

Generally love the reviews at Pajiba and was enthused to read this one. Unfortunately, I think you let this one get away from you, Dustin. You let your conceit/hook for the review override what should be job number 1 for every movie review: tell the viewer what you thought of the film. Use your conceit as a framework, fine. But don't devote 98% of the text to it.

Posted by: Roger at September 22, 2006 9:49 PM

I guess that review is kind of funny, but it just makes me think that you have some pent up, unfocused, agression or rage or love towards these men and men of their kind.

Do sky divers sky dive because they wanna suck a little cock?

And what about the folks on fear factor, I thought it was about money, not being "gay".

In fact I find your whole rant quite, quite offensive.

Eating horse shit is the alternative to being gay? The only way to be gay in a "soceity" that doesn't except gays?

Go figure.

Posted by: John at September 22, 2006 11:45 PM

To repeat Lucinda81, some of you on this board must look up HYPERBOLE. www.dictionary.com will help you in this respect. And if not, I suggest that you read "A Modest Proposal" by Jonathan Swift. Mr. Dahmer recommends it and besides, kids are nice...on rye bread with mayonnaise. Delish!!

Posted by: ScarletKnight at September 23, 2006 2:27 AM

there is a great article on this on afterelton.com

Posted by: Carrie at September 23, 2006 4:42 AM

great review...

...and my god is that movie hilarious

Posted by: joe at September 23, 2006 12:58 PM

knoxville has a kid, but whose the other one with a kid?

Posted by: jenn at September 23, 2006 1:43 PM

"In your own effort to prove the complexity of human sexuality, you've actually stated the opposite: every man who doesn't act like a fag, is, in fact, a fag."

"Please please please do not try to dress up a bitchy review as an act of social conscience."

"Use your conceit as a framework, fine. But don't devote 98% of the text to it."

You're all insane.

Do you have any idea what site this is? This is Pajiba, and Dustin is reviewing the SECOND JACKASS. GET YOUR HEADS OUT OF YOUR ASSES.

And Dustin, you are, incontrovertibly, the man.

Posted by: slick at September 23, 2006 2:35 PM

(guffaw, chortle) best review, ever. From moment one I suspected these dudes were suppressing deep urges to sample the man-batter and pack the fudge. Anyone who has a problem with this review is clearly lusting after Mr. Knoxville's member.

Posted by: fatso at September 23, 2006 4:08 PM

Fianaly Someone else who sees these brave tortured souls as the Forefrunt of the American Avant Guard. No words can express my thanks.


P.S. Funny, funny shit. Good Job.

Posted by: Festusio at September 23, 2006 7:50 PM

If Jackass is a comment on pent up homoerotic fantasies of closeted fraternity boys than maybe Paris Hilton is really a comment on the denigration of materialism on the human psyche and maybe ... maybe ... maybe ... or maybe they are both just retards :)

Posted by: Maria at September 23, 2006 7:55 PM

Incredible. I've read the review over four times now and I still can't figure out if Dustin liked the movie or not.

One thing's for sure though, and that's that no matter how much these guys got paid to do this, no amount of money is worth the world knowing you voluntarily drank pony jizz and having that action on film.

Posted by: Matt 2.0 at September 23, 2006 8:09 PM

>>>.Am I perverted for wanting to fuck Johnny Knoxville? Is it wrong of me to want that strangely disproportioned, reptilian body crawling over mine? To dream of clamping that sardonic go-to-hell grin between my thighs? Do other females have these dirty, dirty thoughts?

Posted by: any*mouse at September 23, 2006 8:11 PM

Haven't seen it, won't see it, couldn't care less about it. I'm just glad to hear Corona by the Minutemen in the trailer. The lyrics, should you care:

The people will survive
In their environment
The dirt, scarcity, and the emptiness
Of our South
The injustice of our greed
The practice we inherit
The dirt, scarcity and the emptiness
Of our South
There on the beach
I could see it in her eyes
I only had a Corona
Five cent deposit

Posted by: sansho1 at September 23, 2006 10:09 PM

Actually I believe that Bam Margera has a baby, in answer to the poster above.

Who knew that the Jackass movie would turn out to be better than the other one opening this weekend with all the Oscar winners?

Go figure.

Posted by: Hippo at September 23, 2006 11:52 PM

>>>.Am I perverted for wanting to fuck Johnny Knoxville? Is it wrong of me to want that strangely disproportioned, reptilian body crawling over mine? To dream of clamping that sardonic go-to-hell grin between my thighs? Do other females have these dirty, dirty thoughts?

>>Yes, yes we do.....

Oh yes. A lot. Except with Jason Statham. Ok Johnny Knoxville too.

Posted by: sandy at September 24, 2006 12:25 AM

sandy, Jason Statham does not have a strangely-proportioned body. Jason Statham is a smoove-headed scary-ass Adonis, and I feel no awkwardness about my lust for him.

There's something about Johnny Knoxville's physique that's just...wrong...I can't put my finger on it. There's just something about the whole Knoxville presentation that says, "nasty, nasty fun which you will regret immediately, and for the rest of your life."

Posted by: Jerce at September 24, 2006 12:59 AM

I am friends with a guy who can't go see the Jackass movies because he won't be able to stop himself from masturbating in the movie theater.

I think that pretty much confirms the total and complete genius and truth of the above review.

Posted by: chriso at September 24, 2006 1:47 AM

Ain't it the truth? Genius. It is all very clear to me now.

Posted by: Christina at September 24, 2006 9:03 AM

Jerce,
Spot on about JS vs JK. No comparison. Frankly, based on the things that JK does, I wouldn't touch him with a ten-foot pole. I'm thinking there has to be some sort of unknown disease or something just festering within all of those guys....'cause sipping on horse ejaculate ain't natural, no matter how you look at it. Blech.

Posted by: Daphne at September 24, 2006 11:42 AM

Just because you can't appreciate quality entertainment doesn't mean you have to try and bash it. You seem like one of those kids who always got picked last in gym class, Dustin.

Posted by: Chris at September 24, 2006 2:46 PM

I don't know what's wrong with me. Everyone, I mean EVERYONE I know wants to see this. From frat-boys to hippity hipster music snobs to mcpunky punkerston. My stomach ain't strong enough.

Posted by: sparker at September 24, 2006 2:46 PM

As Freud said "sometimes a cigar is just a cigar"! For sure the JackAss'rs "Dare Devils" are explorers who are creating entertainmnet by smashing through the barriers of various taboos.

These movies could have been titled "Risky Business" because thats the point taking risks and taking the kind of foolish,sangerous risks that we've always,since childhood been warned about.So instead of Jack-Ass being some kind of unconsious methapor for homosexuality its actually more about daring,challenging and transgressing the limits of what used to be morally acceptable and physically prudent.Its comedy based on old time slap-stick and buffonery not on somekind of subliminal sexual repression.

Posted by: Ken Augustino at September 24, 2006 4:10 PM

Dustin, I think you are taking the behavior of these jackasses on too deep a freudian scale, I don't think that they have a desire to screw each other, although I have to say some of the things they do are homo-erotic in a way. I do not think their behavior is that deeply thought out, I think they are simply jackasses who do whatever will get them ratings, chicks, and money.

Posted by: Patrick at September 24, 2006 5:08 PM

You know what's really gay though? These comments you guys are leaving. Why don't you go ahead and jerk the guy off right now and we can all move on.

Posted by: Yeah... at September 24, 2006 5:11 PM

sipping on horse ejaculate ain't natural

I never said I would kiss him on the mouth.

Posted by: Jerce at September 24, 2006 5:31 PM

johhnny johnny whydidyabeatupthatquir? johnny pissoff??? I think jackass showed a deep pent up need to be mounted by a stallion, is that closet zoosex?wouln't even fit inna closet, more like storage container, yep, their all storage container queens....sheesh...

Posted by: hooty at September 25, 2006 12:25 AM

Ken reminded me of something -- there was a movie a few years ago in which a character attempted to deconstruct the shrewd humor of Freddy Got Fingered to a girl he was trying to impress. As I recall, it didn't work. Can anyone tell me what movie that was?

Posted by: sansho1 at September 25, 2006 12:28 AM

Eureka! It was Martin Starr, beloved at Pajiba for his role as Bill Haverchuck on Freaks and Geeks, in a guest appearance on Undeclared. Ken, you're Bill Haverchuck! Dude!!

Posted by: sansho1 at September 25, 2006 12:37 AM

FYI Chris Pontius has always been like that...it's not an act. Perhaps my mom should have returned that child rearing book Freedom Not License she borrowed from his dad 25 years ago!

Posted by: slogirl at September 25, 2006 1:19 AM

The Jackass crew appears to genuinly love each other, in spite of all the toture they put themselves through. I suspect that the reviewer is jealous of the love that men can have for each other in a non sexual way. Lets not project your daddy issues on the movie review, sir.

Posted by: jason at September 25, 2006 6:45 AM

It is so strange that you would consider grown men drinking sperm and ramming phallics up their butts art and yet you criticize movies that pass a true message of humanity and love thy neighbor and have actual film art (Fearless). I like reading your reviews, but this review not only disappoints me but makes me question myself. I actually like this guy? We are a strange group of Americans when grown men enjoy other grown men doing stupid, painful, and disgusting things to each other make more money than real movies.

Posted by: confused at September 25, 2006 9:34 AM

Come on. These guys were all staring at the giant bags of money that were suspended from the boom right behind the camera, with a dollar sign painted on them. Of course, they'd do it for free, to try to extend their 15 minutes just a few more seconds. However, when they are on, it really is funny.

Posted by: jason at September 25, 2006 10:07 AM

in my neck of the woods at least one man dies every year from having intercourse with a horse--as receiver. they don't die from the act itself, but from the horse's ejaculation (ruptured internal organs). it is some kind of club, full of young, straight, white men.

not totally on topic, but i like to share! (actually i get nightmares every time it is on the news and i'm a bit sadistic) oh, and it isn't illegal.

Posted by: pq at September 25, 2006 12:53 PM

"There's just something about the whole Knoxville presentation that says, 'nasty, nasty fun which you will regret immediately, and for the rest of your life.'"

...but which would leave you with memories of a damn good fuck to sweeten your regrets.

I'm one of the several hetero chicks that -- to my suprise -- would jump Knoxville in a heartbeat.

I don't know that it's homosexual energy that fuels these guys as much as just sexual energy and a lust for...life? death? There's something really really sexually appealing about people who don't take their own lives seriously, who -- no matter what nasty depths of the psyche it takes them to -- are determined to do the things that makes them giggle like school boys.

I'm a notoriously squeamish prude who would wrinkle my nose in distaste when one of my friends would describe "Jackass" episodes to me. Then I saw the first movie and was amazed at how long and hard and gleefully I laughed. I hardly knew who I was but I knew I had a respect for these guys who are probably assholes but have tapped into something vital that seems to be missing in today's society.

I say these guys aren't harbingers of a moral meltdown of our society, but beacons pointing towards something good. Well, maybe they are a little bit of both.

Posted by: Deanna at September 25, 2006 5:01 PM

It's a snooty, pretentious, wine-tasters' review of a friggin' Jackass movie, and yet it's amazing how few people realized the review itself was a joke. The fact that someone would wax so philosophical over retarded rodeo clowns with a video camera is funny! I hate to be Joke Explainy Guy, but GOD.

And as far as homosexual subtext goes, if they hadn't gotten their fifteen minutes for stapling their genitals to their foreheads, half the Jackass crew would probably be selling ass to rich old men for pot money and skate decals.

Posted by: Craig at September 25, 2006 5:46 PM

To Jenn, Ehren McGehee is the other member of the Jackass Crew with a kid (or two, possibly, can't quite remember). And as far as Johnny Knoxville goes, I could do some dirty, dirty things to that man. Sadly enough, there are a few guys in the Jackass crew who I wouldn't mind having my way with. Oh well. Call me sick, but at least they would make me laugh. =D

Posted by: SillyBecky at September 25, 2006 10:09 PM

Knoxville never drank the spooge. Your article is rife with lies.

Posted by: rxsheepxr at September 26, 2006 12:41 AM

Loved your review Dustin. I feel a little less guilty now for liking the original Jackass movie so much. I laughed all the way through it and there were times when it totally turned me on. I'm gay, so go figure. A straight guy sticking a toy car up his ass just does something for me. I thought it was the gayest movie I'd ever seen. Reading your review of Jackass Number Two convinced me I'm going to love this one even more than the first one.

Will the boys start fucking each other by the third or the fourth installment?

Posted by: Tom C at September 26, 2006 1:49 AM

Hilarious. Both the post and the comments. Thank you.

Posted by: Smith at September 26, 2006 8:52 AM

You my friend, are a fucking genius.

Posted by: Maria at September 26, 2006 12:55 PM

Well, as usual, misinterpretation of arts focus turns the lense inward.
Dustin, you are picking up a few things that are there. There is definately a homo-erotic undertone. However, instead of asking the sharper question of how it makes YOU feel about YOUR views, you are quick to assume you can surmise the motivations and deep psychological thoughts of the cast of Jackass.

At least you did think the movie was funny. For that, you earn much respect. It is very funny!

Painfully funny.

However, something I know, having some proximity to this gang, is that they simply want to make the world less homophobic.

Now before you launch into a debate, think of all those young men and women, many of whom are college aged, and perhaps in frats or sororities. Anyone who's been in that realm knows the homophobic ideas that abound. Some of those kids self hate, as they don't understand their own feelings. Jackass does more to relieve this nationally accepted hatred for alternative lifestyles than any other organization.

And they do it with humor.

So, go grab the latest Turbonegro album (they're from Demark) open up a Tom of Finland book, and have a beer with the closest gay frined you have.

And have a good laugh, knowing that sometimes the court jester speaks the loudest and fairest words...

LOL! It a very funny f-n movie!

Posted by: J. Montgo at September 26, 2006 1:17 PM

I think that the film hit a little too close to home for you.

Posted by: overthinker at September 26, 2006 1:22 PM

I say when people can't tell when you're being ironic or not, it's time to put that little toy back in the war chest and give something else a try.

Posted by: Johnny Nashville at September 26, 2006 2:32 PM

My God Dustin - PUT DOWN THE THESAURUS. You're reviewing "Jackass" - not writing a dissertation on the cosmos.

The Jackass sequel was actually even funnier than the first. Absolutely freakin hilarious - most of the audience could be heard blowing their nose from tears of laughter during the few quiet moments of the movie.

Is there too much cock 'n balls? Definitely. But I don't think it's on a homosexual level. Your comparison of Knoxville getting slammed by a bull, constitutes his want for some sausage is completely asinine.

Does Top Gun have sexual overtones? yes. Goose was named that for a reason.
Does Jackass solicite homo erotic behavior? Hell no. Not unless you're wanting it to.

Posted by: Master Zen at September 26, 2006 4:39 PM

Is "Scathing Reviews For Some Bitchy People, As Well As Many Who Wouldn't Know Irony If It Fucked Them In the Eyeball" too big to fit on the title page?

Posted by: Craig at September 26, 2006 6:00 PM

Great review, what we need to understand is that these men aren´t gay, they just want to fuck each other, yes,in the ass and yes all the way up, that´s a guys thing and we need to respect that. Apparently they are pretty sensitive there, in a way that it seems frightening for all those gay implications but at the same time still a temptation, remember those stories of men in emergency rooms with broom sticks and bottles in their asses?, you know the story,"it was an accident".

All those movies marketed at "guys" and "dudes" are pretty homoerotic, just think about Harold and Kumar go to Whitecastle.

Posted by: goldend at September 26, 2006 7:56 PM

I am going to have to join the ranks of the women who would totally jump Johnny Knoxville. I'd make him wear a full-body condom, but I'd jump him all the same.

As for Jason Statham.... yuuuuuuuuuuuummmm. If I ever ran into him you couldn't pry me off him with a crowbar. And my husband would understand.

And the review... I loved it. Highly amusing. Mad props.

Posted by: AnnArrogance at September 26, 2006 8:32 PM

It's CRAZY that I like Jackass. I go to art museums. I read literature. I listen to really high quality music. I have a PhD. I'm not a snob, contrary to what I just wrote. I just don't generally get into low-brow stuff.

But guys who intentionally hurt themselves on camera? Can't get enough of it. It almost disturbs me that I like it so much. It's twisted. And I love it.

(Wanders off, scratching head...)

Posted by: Kathy at September 26, 2006 10:48 PM

Thank you Dustin.

Just when I think you're about to lose me, a review like this comes out and reaffirms my faith in your keen sense of irony.

To those of you who'd like to argue the point: Yes, you can shove a toy car up your ass and still be straight. But, you can't put a condom on it and lube it up and expect people to believe it.

Posted by: Smokin at September 27, 2006 3:48 PM

Not that anyone likely cares, but apparently Wee Man's got a baby on the way. I heard it on Love Line a few nights ago. I hate working so late I end up listening to Steve-O give love & sex advice on the way home . . .

Posted by: teehee at September 29, 2006 9:04 PM

I saw that movie today and came away thinking "Aha! I think know who the gay Jackass is!"

*cough* Pontius *cough*

That man does things that no straight guy would even consider

Posted by: Bongo at September 30, 2006 10:22 PM

I didn't really think it was funny until I saw the movie. Now I get it.

Posted by: jared at October 2, 2006 11:16 AM

Hey, not for nothing did I include the original Jackass in my book 101 Must-See Movies for Gay Men. Good post.

Posted by: Alonso Duralde at October 2, 2006 3:36 PM

Great review dude. I can't believe there are so many people who actually got offended by it. Makes you wish people were required to take some kind of 'humor/irony identification test' before they get on the internet.

Posted by: Grif at October 2, 2006 3:42 PM

i still don't get the multiplex comic.

http://www.multiplexcomic.com/

Posted by: jeff at October 2, 2006 5:37 PM

This movie waz the shizzle...fo' shu! Jackass Part Three has already been approved and we should see it around the same time 2007!

The Jackass crew waited a bit too long since the last movie and most of the fan base moved on too, but they are still funny as shit!

Gotta love the part where he drinks horse sperm and eats poop!!

Posted by: Pimp_G_Dawg at October 4, 2006 5:20 PM

Reading both the review and the message board I must say I'm not a little perturbed. First of all, instead of actually discussing the high and low points of the movie i.e. reviewing it Dustin instead chooses to make people think that it is somehow a comment on society. Now, when I watched the movie I was sometimes horrified at what they were doing just due to the sheer depravity of it. However most of the time I was laughing so hard that I cried. This movie is, as the name describes, a bunch of guys being Jackasses. Mind you this is hilarious, so an entire movie of it works. Earlier a person mentioned how in the original Jackass one guy shoved a metal car in a heavily lubed condom up his ass, using this to further Dustin's point about them being Homosexual. This is most certainly not true. The car was in the tied off condom so the sharp metal parts would hurt the guy trying it. It was in his ass because otherwise he would have had to swallow it and then get his stomach pumped later to avoid extreme injury to himself. It was lubed because otherwise it would have most probably hurt like hell. This is not the men of Jackass being gay, it's them being smart. One final point is that Dustin remarked on how if you don't act in a homosexual manner, then you are a homosexual who is repressing his true desires while if you DO act homosexually then you are just a gay man who has found himself and we have been told in the media that everything that happens to a man happens to a woman. Thus in effect Dustin is effectively stating that everyone is homosexual, and anybody who is straight is just suppressing unnatural urges. And as any person who has a speck of common sense knows, that's just ridiculous.

Posted by: Magi at October 5, 2006 6:20 PM

blah blah blah...
too much analysis going on here, though Dustin the review was pitch-perfect.

I laughed and I almost puked four times. What a way to spend Saturday night when The Departed was sold out.

Posted by: Theresa at October 7, 2006 11:59 PM

you honestly cant take this artful satire and believe it's serious.

it's not "scathing reviews for goddamn crybabies".

jesus christ people.

Posted by: razh at October 11, 2006 9:11 PM

Am I the only person that finds your writing annoying? You could very well be right about Jackass but I think I'd rather stick needles in my eyes than read anymore of your utterly pedantic writing - yet I keep coming back to this site knowing it will provide some smart ideas only to leave me wanting to kill myself after reading it. Your sentences go on for about 75 years. I think the big issue here is your desire to have sex with yourself.

Posted by: R at October 20, 2006 10:38 AM

I sincerely hope you're joking...

Posted by: alexis at October 20, 2006 12:07 PM

"This is not the men of Jackass being gay, it's them being smart."

God bless you, Magi. God bless you.

Speaking of blessings, long live the pedantic 75-year-long sentence! If I was the reviewer I'd want to have sex with myself too, which come to think of it is pretty gay because a guy wanting to have sex with himself is a guy wanting to have sex with a guy. Dustin. You fag.

Posted by: circlejerk at October 20, 2006 1:13 PM

It's probably too late in the thread for anyone to be reading this, but I'm not convinced that Magi isn't being ironic, maybe in some uber-meta way. I mean, this is priceless, so let me get it straight: Putting a Matchbox car in a condom, to avoid sharp edges; lubing it up to avoid extra pain; and shoving it in your ass instead of swallowing it to avoid having your stomach pumped. This is "smart"? I'd love to see something you think is dumb.

Posted by: JMW at October 26, 2006 5:54 PM

The only thing I find more retarded than watching Jackass is the joy some of my mates get out of watching it.

Oh, and 'Wavemaven'... While Knoxville's return was much "like going back to old lovers you just can't quit thinking about", I think it may be more likely that idiots will do anything when you wave money in front of them.

Posted by: Jeremy at October 26, 2006 7:42 PM

Fantastic and eloquent!!
Really!
You are bookmarked.

Posted by: K at October 27, 2006 10:53 PM

I thought the review was very clever, really well written, ironic and just terribly funny.

I think the people on the message board that "don't get it" just don't get anything. Bitch bitch bitch. I feel bad for them, their sad, unintentional lives.

Nirradus

Posted by: NIRradus at October 30, 2006 6:11 PM

as a soon-to-be psychologist, i can only laugh really hard at the pathetic psychonanalysis of this movie. they dont even teach that approach anymore, welcome to 2006. steve-o once said he does this to fight homophobia. go watch the gumball movie, and hear pontius and him talk about girls all the time. this movie is about shocking the viewers, and doing some borderline homosexual stuff is a great way to do it, especially for such an homophobic crowd as the US'. sure they might be a bit deviant - i mean there is a lot sadism/masochism in there - but you know, its tempting for a writer to jump to conclusions even though the information is lacking... if it can make him seem intelligent to most people. personally i think this review is a failed attempt at that, rather than an objective and realistic review.

Posted by: er at November 5, 2006 7:20 AM

I don't remember a time when I've been so in awe of the pure genius that was this review.
wellwisher
tahir
00923345655007

Posted by: sweet tahir for u at November 7, 2006 3:07 AM

However, I'm guessing it will be a while until we see Johnny clutching a blood (and in this case, horse-splooge)-stained shirt while crying, eh?

thnx
tahir
00923345655007

Posted by: sweet tahir for u at November 7, 2006 3:10 AM

I Love the jackass gang i have double of the box set wildboyz every thing i am a huge fan i love the gang i cant wait until they make another one
thx

Posted by: sarah at November 11, 2006 4:54 PM

first... LOL
second... LOL
third... u all must have been picked on pritty bad by these "Frat Boys" i mean lol come on are u really that imature that u will now bundle every fun loving drinker into the frat boys image then mock? get over urself there just having fun and making shitloads of money doing it... taking risk is not being dumb its being adventures and there famous becaue of it why dont u get off ur 400 pound ass and get over ur retarded self...
thx for understanding thaat im right and i pitty it if u are in denial=(

Posted by: u all suck??? at November 21, 2006 11:59 PM

first... LOL
second... LOL
third... u all must have been picked on pritty bad by these "Frat Boys" i mean lol come on are u really that imature that u will now bundle every fun loving drinker into the frat boys image then mock? get over urself there just having fun and making shitloads of money doing it... taking risk is not being dumb its being adventures and there famous becaue of it why dont u get off ur 400 pound ass and get over ur retarded self...
thx for understanding thaat im right and i pitty it if u are in denial=(

Posted by: u all suck??? at November 22, 2006 12:00 AM

im 52 years old & as queer as a 3 dollar bill...ive never seen the tv show but ive seen both movies...i laughed i cried i crawled on my belly like a reptile...& i totally agree with your review...fucking brilliant!

Posted by: john a. drummond at January 6, 2007 4:52 PM

so fucking awesome dude

Posted by: a.b. at January 15, 2007 12:05 PM

johnny doesn't drink it-only chris does. :^D

Posted by: Jackass is awesome!! at February 4, 2007 9:50 PM

sometimes a cigar is just a cigar...but if the cigar is up your ass? I think the author has a very good point. Upon seeing jackass two my discomfort grew. and if you see the extras at the end of the DVD then you can see johnnys 'homophobic' disclaimer message. their prod. co. is called dickhouse with a rainbow above it. and if male on male nude activity isn't gay, then what is? I'm not saying anything against gays, but I'm sick of Americans living in denial and unable to call a spade a spade and a fag a fag. don't peg me as latent or as seeing something that's not there. I clearly can see by watching it, they are in fact gay, closet or in denial. yeah I laughed along with the rest, but it's clear now the author has some real insight into some troubled guys...

Posted by: aj at March 21, 2007 6:51 AM

You're not saying anything against gays, but you resent not being able to call them fags? Those paint chips were kinda tasty when you were a toddler, eh?

Posted by: Craig at March 31, 2007 9:48 PM

a number of points from me:
1. the review was written very well and was a pleasure to read.
2. i personally think that they are all just friends and not secret homosexual lovers, but even if they were, so what? why is everyone making such a big deal about whether they act gay or not? it really shouldnt matter either way. You dont have to be straight (or gay for that matter) to act like idiots and get paid for it. a lot of people on here act like they are educated, intelligent and articulate, when in fact they are placing so much importance on someones sexuality. im sure they wouldnt want to be pigeon-holed like that, the jackass crew just want people to watch their movie so that they can get paid.
3. about the whole "sticking a toy car in my ass" thing, the whole premise of the skit was to see the reaction of the doctor when he saw a miniature car in Dunn's rectum, which i think would be funny, and is a good idea for a skit. the fact that Dunn would prefer the insertion and removal or said car as easy and painless as possible is a moot point. wouldnt it be gayer if he stuck it up there without a condom on, then had to force his hand up his butt to get it out?

Posted by: ruby at April 17, 2007 11:09 AM


I see this is yet another website where minds of average intelligence and experience congregate and feverishly pander over some thesaurus thumping hypocrite's intellectual masturbation.

With each successive example Rowles provides, his searching for an answer to these peoples' sexuality, merely marks his incredulity with his own homoerotic fantasies verging pathetic. This combined with the detail in his illustrations only exemplifies just how much time Rowles has spent daydreaming of men. And none of this has anything to do with the movie of which he writes.

If a viewer ponders about the social morality of this movie, then the point has been missed and it is obvious they are female or like Mr. Rowles, unable to grasp why they find the members of Jackass sexually appealing instead of entertaining. The participants in the movie probably know themselves well enough to not read in the sexual connotations to ever stunt they perform, unlike the author of this review, who apparently sees homosexuality in everything. I wouldn't feel comfortable eating a hotdog, or ice cream cone around Rowles. As actor Ted Levine stated in an interview concerning his portrayal of a trans-sexual, with all the media hype fixated on female sexuality it is no wonder that male sexuality is virtually unknown.

There was nothing to be learned from the critique, but much to be learned about the author. Which leads me to my last point...the movie was by far more entertaining than Mr. Rowles will ever be.

Posted by: Dr. Knowitall at May 1, 2007 5:24 PM

Rowles, i love you, but you're wrong

Posted by: MAx at May 16, 2007 9:44 PM





Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.