free counter with statistics In the Name of the King: A Dungeon Siege Tale | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

king354.jpg

Yep…It Sucks!

In the Name of the King: A Dungeon Siege Tale / Phillip Stephens

Film Reviews | January 11, 2008 | Comments (65)


I don’t even know what to say anymore. Another January, another Toilet Boll fiasco lurching abominably into theaters, filled with an ill-fittingly large budget and a mix of good actors incomprehensibly slumming and bad actors happy that someone checked them out of rehab for the weekend and gave them enough ludes to get through their scenes. And guess what? It blows. And guess what? No one needed to be told that. And guess what some more? No one will go see it, and yet I’ll still be here come January 2009 weeping tears of sulfur for my lost youth and jamming needles into my Uwe Boll voodoo doll’s eyeballs and crotch while cursing this anathema to filmmaking and his German tax shelter.

So, really, what more can I tell you about the gauche mouthful that is In the Name of the King: A Dungeon Siege Tale? The films of Uwe Boll belong on VHS tapes in one of those quaint rental stores where they’re grouped with Deathstalker III, Hawk the Slayer, and Ator — The Fighting Eagle for those who appreciate delicious fantasy camp, not in theaters with budgets and actual actors, however low they’ve fallen.

Let’s get this over with: A farmer named Farmer (Jason Statham) lives the quiet life with his busty bride (Claire Forlani) and son. And he enjoys farming. One day, some nasty orc-pigs come a-raiding, killing Farmer’s sire and making off with his comely damsel. The orc-pigs are led by a wizard, Gallian (Ray Liotta), who is conspiring with Duke Fallow (Matthew Lillard) to take over King Konreid’s (Burt Reynolds) kingdom. Jesus, I wish I were making those casting choices up; rounding up the ensemble are John Rhys-Davies as a wizard, Leelee Sobieski as a wizard/whore, Ron Perlman as a warrior-ape, Brian J. White as a general, and Kristanna Loken as a telekinetic Amazon.

The plot oozes like toothpaste across 127 of the longest minutes you’ll ever endure, punctuated with fight scenes edited into a visual miasma. Boll continues to think that more violence = more entertainment, but watching bloodless beat ‘em ups involving characters to whom you’re palpably indifferent is more boring than I can describe. At least BloodRayne had cheesy violence. And I’m fairly certain that most of the cast is in on the joke: only Statham and Perlman assay their roles with the niche fun to be had in an awful movie, while everyone else either chews scenery unconvincingly (Forlani and Liotta) or is numbingly dull, except Lillard, who was so bad he may have given me cancer.

But that’s all the rancor I’m going to muster for Dungeon Siege, and I’m sorry if that disappoints on the scathing/bitchy front. The fact is everything about Uwe Boll has been said quite thoroughly by now. His films are achieving more and more technical competency as he progresses, but this actually works to the detriment of the films since they were only worth so-bad-it’s-good value in the first place. Hating on this guy has become old hat, and his publicity stunts, such as beating up his harshest decriers and making a film as self-consciously offensive as Postal informs a peculiar psychological malady: this man actually yearns to be hated, and every action in this vein smacks of a sad little man raging against his own obsolescence. Well, I’m through validating this imbecile with scorn; besides, anyone who’s capable of writing this to a critic makes it feel politically incorrect to make fun of their subnormal ass. The time for mocking Toilet Boll is over, and the time for ignoring him has begun.

Phillip Stephens is the lead critic for Pajiba. He lives in Fayetteville, AR, and says to hell with boxing Uwe Boll. He’ll come at the motherfucker with a chainsaw.


Pajiba Love 01/11/08 | Orphanage, The



Comments

"Yep... It Sucks!" was all I needed to read...

Posted by: Tsuru at January 11, 2008 9:04 PM

Funny, in Germany, where Uwe Boll is from, this movie had been marketed without even mention his name. No TV ad blaring "an Uwe Boll film". I mean, i could clearly see that this movie sucks like [insert catchy metaphor here] (Ray Liotta, please, no) but it wasn't until this atrocity, this unholy waste of celluloid came out in the states that i realized this is really another Uwe Boll masterpiece. Is it just me, or does his budget continues to raise? How does he do that? Who on earth is giving him money?

Posted by: Arthur Dent at January 11, 2008 9:09 PM

"The plot oozes like toothpaste across 127 of the longest minutes you'll ever endure, punctuated with fight scenes edited into a visual miasma."

You claim not to be trying, but that line's still hilarious/perfect. I've had to stare at a poster for this every day for a month now in the subway, and this review feels like karmic payback for having to endure Leelee Sobieski undressing me listlessly with her dead, dead eyes every morning and evening. So thank you.

Posted by: be right back at January 11, 2008 9:21 PM

O.k. so this review was the kind where I read ever other line to my husband because I thought it was so hilarious and the poor guy is rolling his eyes as I crack up in the middle of what I'm reading... so basically, thanks for making me look like an ass, Phillip.

Posted by: lilianna28 at January 11, 2008 10:02 PM

That stuff from Wired is fantastic. They didn't like the movie, so Uwe thinks they hate independent film, weren't smart enough to get his vision, and like to fuck their movies.

He's so well informed. In an AV Club interview he said Michael Bay got a $100m budget for his first movie and that Eli Roth is only working because he's Joe Roth's son.

Posted by: Arran at January 11, 2008 10:04 PM

Um, I meant "fuck their mothers".

It's like I was using predictive texting or something.

Posted by: Arran at January 11, 2008 10:10 PM

So this is what Matthew Lillard's been up to.

Wait Eli Roth is Joe Roth's son? How did I not know this?

Posted by: Alabamapink at January 11, 2008 10:10 PM

He's not Joe Roth's son. Uwe is just an idiot.

Also, Michael Bay did not get a $100m budget for his first film (Bad Boys). It was about $20m.

Posted by: Arran at January 11, 2008 10:12 PM

It sucks? I'm ............shocked.

buuuuuuuut, it's the Transporter, and I might have some weird "gay" (if wanting to see everything Jason Statham is in. is considered gay, that's YOUR problem... KAY?..... YOUR PROBLEM! WANNA ARM WRESTLE? AH? AH? Anybody see the game last night? TK? Verm? see the game?

Anyway I'm seeing it, you all make me sick.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 11, 2008 10:35 PM

Farmer's wife doesn't even have a name? Or are they copying Q. T. by calling her Bride?

Posted by: the_wakeful at January 11, 2008 10:39 PM

Why the hell have I not heard of this movie? Judging from the review, I guess I should be happy about that fact.

Posted by: Kolby at January 11, 2008 10:41 PM

It gave you cancer, huh? Send my regards to Congo Jack.

Posted by: Jo 'Mama' Besser at January 11, 2008 10:47 PM

Congo Jack? Is he related to Congo Bongo?

Hmmmmm, where's my ColecoVision ?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 11, 2008 11:00 PM

Dammit. I just watched Basquiat the other day and Claire Forlani is so awesome. I wish she didn't have to do this crap. I was just talking about her TODAY wondering what she was up to. I wish I didn't know.

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at January 11, 2008 11:04 PM

"except Lillard, who was so bad he may have given me cancer."
Note to self: never drink while reading one of Phillips reviews! Almost choked to death and my monitor got wet!
I can't say I'm surprised it sucked balls but...Jason, Ray why do you do this to us?

Posted by: trixie at January 11, 2008 11:28 PM

This movie trailer has been all over TV for the last week and and after seeing it I said to myself 'This movie SUCKS'.
I am so glad to see my conversations with myself have reached such profoundly informed levels.
Seriously, I am so sorry you had to sit through the full-length feature, the trailer seriously made it look as though it was a cheesy sci-fi budget production - you know 'The eye of the beast' sort of thing with James Van Der Crap.

Posted by: gunter at January 11, 2008 11:36 PM

I'm a huge sucker for bad fantasy straight to DVD movies. I love them. I saw this commercial and it looked terrible. I can't even begin to imagine what most of the actors were thinking when they signed on to this crap. I can only imagine that Boll had them sign something in blood ...

Posted by: Maria at January 11, 2008 11:38 PM

Erm...

...is Pajiba going to review The Orphanage?

Sorry to hear about Matthew Lillard. Husband likes SLC Punk so much he bought the DVD.

And finally: Is it wrong of me to want to see Postal? I actually really do.

Posted by: Jerce at January 11, 2008 11:39 PM

Suckitude duly noted and fully expected. I'm seeing it anyway. Just sayin'.

Posted by: Daphne at January 12, 2008 12:53 AM

Slim, I love you. And yes, it is gay. Take from someone who will see this for the same reason.

Posted by: Smokin at January 12, 2008 1:10 AM

I hope no one surprised that Boll's movies have gone from "Dumber than Shit" to "So Awful They Cause Cancer" to "Ending All Life As We Know It."

Someone somewhere can explain to me who exactly gives Boll money and how he's able to pay them back. Because outside the most self-effacing or self-hating of movie geeks, no one goes to see Uwe Boll's movies.

Oh and that thing with Wired News is hilarious. I love that he tells his lawyer that Wired "can't recognize genius." Imagine. So much talent and yet so humble...

Posted by: BFFredo at January 12, 2008 1:53 AM

There was a tax shelter available in Germany that was meant to be used to encourage German made films..Basically, for every dollar a movie lost the backers got 2 dollars in tax credits..the Germans revocked it because of Uwe, but he had a whole slew of films in pre-production so he can go a couple more years before his tax sheltering bad movie making life has to change

Posted by: Bob at January 12, 2008 2:33 AM

After seeing the preview for this the first time, I seriously thought it was a joke. It just looked....so, so bad. Your review title pretty much sums it up.

Posted by: Dingles at January 12, 2008 3:40 AM

You know what's funny? He doesn't want to be hated, or at least he came across that way at the NY Fangoria's Weekend of Horror last summer. He was genuinely excited to talk about all six (6!) of his upcoming projects and kind of won the crowd over.

Not that that makes him a good filmmaker, a decent person, or worth the German tax shelter (which, like Bob said, went bye bye for Mr. Boll, hence six (6!) forthcoming film projects) by any means. Just a horribly misguided filmmaker who sometimes knows how to shoot a really pretty scene. He's good with landscapes. Maybe he could stick to that.

Posted by: Robert at January 12, 2008 3:51 AM

"Funny, in Germany, where Uwe Boll is from, this movie had been marketed without even mention his name. No TV ad blaring "an Uwe Boll film"."

That's too bad...because I wish they did.

None of the Boll's trailers, teasers, or commercials from _anywhere_ will ever mention his name, and for good reason, naturally. They don't want ppl to connect the dots and correlate these terrible movies to a name, like we have. And it works. You can't decipher any how bad a Boll movie really is just from a minute trailer that's stuffed with a hundred 3 second cuts.

Posted by: daeyeth at January 12, 2008 3:54 AM

Funnily enough, the main character from the game this is supposedly based on is indeed a farmer (possibly named Farmer), who does look kinda like Statham does in the beginning. It was meant to be a customizable avatar for the player, not the actual character. But of course, Boll kinda misses that mark.

I made a Pro/Con list to see if I would go to this film:

Pros: Jason Statham, Kristanna Loken in something tight and leathery (to offset the gay; too bad Slim!), from a video game I actually enjoyed, and fantasy action.

Cons: Ray Liotta(?), as the evil wizard (???), shooting weird purple gooey mist out of his wrists (!!!!!), from a video game period, fantasy action without a decent budget, and from Uwe Boll.

Yeah, you can see how I narrowly avoided that trap.

Posted by: Vermillion at January 12, 2008 7:48 AM

I'm with you, Vermillion - This?

Leelee Sobieski as a wizard/whore

Almost sucked me in, along with Jason Statham! With a sword!

But BloodRayne was sooo bad, I'm pretty sure it destroyed what was left of Michael Madsen's soul. You could see it in his eyes.

So no.

Posted by: Meander at January 12, 2008 9:01 AM

I cannot wait for this thing to go on DVD! Actually the used bin, at Movie Gallery or GameStop. Either way, I'll save some money and enjoy watching Jason Statham kick some ass. Now this wizard/whore confuses me. Is it a multi-class character, or is that a prestige class?

Posted by: ScarletKnight at January 12, 2008 9:11 AM

I think it's time to have an intervention for Jason Statham. I share B-slim and Smokin's love for the guy but it's getting harder and harder to continue this relationship. Here's hoping Crank 2 (and i have no idea how that will work) gets the guy out the sewer for good. I think Boll must have a 2 foot stack of scandalous photos of half of Hollywood to continue to get even B list level people in his movies. Can't wait to see who pops up in Far Cry.

Posted by: Rob at January 12, 2008 9:49 AM

I had never heard of Uwe Boll before, otherwise I don't think I would have bothered. My husband likes Jason Stratham and wanted to watch the film because of him. I just went along. What a waste of money!!! Seriously and entirely crappy!!! I actually felt insulted. The dialogs are unbearable, the fighting scenes are ridiculous, the shameless copying of LOTR-scenes got on my nerves big time. But the film came out in Germany four weeks ago, so unfortunately I didn't have any Pajiba to warn me. Luckily that doesn't happen very often!

Posted by: Ollie at January 12, 2008 11:37 AM

I am most hurt by the presence of Jason Statham here. I feel betrayed.

Posted by: greer at January 12, 2008 12:01 PM

I saw the movie this summer at the FantAsia festival in Montreal.

Uwe Boll was there to present that movie and Postal. I thought it was OK. Wasn't bad like House of the Dead or Alone in the Dark. Or Bloodrayne.

While not bad, it was pretty much a generic fantasy movie. Yet another farmer-turned-hero-save-the-world-movie.

Postal was most excellent, tho. Really enjoyed that one. The best movie from Uwe Boll so far.

And in person, Uwe Boll is a pretty cool guy.

Posted by: Yig at January 12, 2008 1:00 PM

If someone were to walk up to me and say, "TK, you can either have $200, or you can have 30 minutes to beat the holy bloody fuck out of Matthew Lillard, without consequence or reprimand..."

I mean, that's a genuine dilemma right there.

I'm still having trouble thinking about the cast without bursting into that kind of high-pitched, uncontrolled, spit-flying laughter that gets people committed. Kristanna Loken as a telepathic Amazon? For real?

Posted by: TK at January 12, 2008 1:28 PM

That cut of Fat Ray Liotta powering up and unleashing magic Jell-0 is wrong on many, many, levels. Also, I keep expecting Paul Sorvino and Joe Pesci to pop out the woodwork at some point.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 12, 2008 1:48 PM

BSlim, your are a genius. know one would have thought to reference Goodfellas.

Posted by: Pookie at January 12, 2008 2:30 PM

Would you rather I'd referenced his amazing turn on Muppets From Space?


Didn't think so.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 12, 2008 2:38 PM

Don't sass me!!

Posted by: Pookie at January 12, 2008 2:55 PM

Isn`t Lelee sloblojob already a wizard/whore /mess?

Posted by: pasadenamike at January 12, 2008 3:07 PM

I was reading the "let's get this over with" paragraph, and couldn't believe the casting choices. They got weirder and weirder and just when I thought it couldn't get any weirder, you throw in Burt Reynolds. HAHAHAHHAHA! This has MST3K and a keg party written all over it.

Posted by: BWeaves at January 12, 2008 3:14 PM

Are you surprised? I don't think a single good knights-and-wizards movie has been made in ages.

OK, fine. There was LOTR, but really, Liv Tyler is the original skank cancer, and Elijah Wood was just irritating as Frodo. (Let the hatefest against me begin.)

Posted by: KatyBelle at January 12, 2008 4:09 PM

If this movie buys Ron Perlman a car and nice vacation with his family, I'm ok with that. Uwe Boll still needs to stand trial for his crimes against cinema though.

He's our age's Ed Wood, but less interesting.

Posted by: Cory at January 12, 2008 6:31 PM

Don't sass me!!

Ah, that takes me back....to picking out my own switch. Good times.

(Let the hatefest against me begin.)

Why? Frodo was damn annoying. I half hoped that Sam would have just left his ass on the mountain to his fate. Can't speak to Liv Tyler as orginal recipe skank cancer, though. She was hardly in the films, yes?

Posted by: Daphne at January 12, 2008 7:10 PM

She was hardly in the films, yes?

I must concur. She was barely a blip in the whole shebang. She had like, what, a horse chase and a dream sequence? Now as far as her work outside of that, I can't say she has been as ubiquitous or annoying as the current Skank Cancer.

Plus, as I am a huge supporter of actual or even implied HLA in all forms of media, I cannot in good conscience demean the humongous contribution to the movement that she and Alicia Silverstone made via the "Crazy" video. It is simply not good cricket.

Posted by: Vermillion at January 12, 2008 7:35 PM

Ok, so maybe Skank Cancer is the wrong term. But I still say that Liv Tyler makes me ill.

Every scene that Liv Tyler was in in LOTR was melodramatic, overacted and completely unnecessary. Even as a 15 y/o girl who loved the melodrama, her presence made me cringe and gag.

Anyways, can anyone think of a knights-and-wizards movie that DOESN'T suck balls? The only one I can think of is "Lady Hawke" with Michelle Pfeiffer. But I haven't seen that one in years, so there's a good chance it's not actually as good as I remember.

Posted by: KatyBelle at January 12, 2008 9:50 PM

I knew this movie couldn't be good. I mean, my MOM pointed out what horrible actors the people were. This is the same woman who couldn't understand why I thought Charlie's Angels 2 was stupid or why no one liked Ghost Rider.

Posted by: Jamila at January 12, 2008 9:53 PM

Most mid-evil/knight movie's have a young set of people for the cast, in other words no one but the dying king look a day over 25. So when I saw Leelee Sobieski in the previews, and she looked like she was the main female character, I knew it would suck. Not to mention the fact that it had no discernable plot. I didn't even need the confirmation that it sucked, I just clicked the link to read the witty commentary.

On another note: Jamilla, your mom thought Ghost Rider was a good movie? That is wrong on so many levels....

Posted by: Kay at January 12, 2008 11:50 PM

My god. I usually have some hope for directors; that they can maybe, maybe, produce a movie that's really good after loads of bombs or average movies. Uwe Boll is not one of those people. I actually want to physically hurt the man. This isn't cinema, this is defecating on celluloid.

Posted by: Brooke at January 13, 2008 3:16 AM

I'm a long time visitor of the ole Pajiba and my hate for Uwe Boll has actually made me step out of the shadows. I know hating Boll isn't particularly unique but I just can't seem to make sense of how he continues to direct. It almost makes my brain shut down. I know he's taken a bit of my soul for sure.

On another note, considering how eager he is to defend his "genius" think we can lure him here? Oh God the possibilities!

Posted by: JDIII at January 13, 2008 6:08 AM

"Lady Hawke" with Michelle Pfeiffer. But I haven't seen that one in years, so there's a good chance it's not actually as good as I remember.

Posted by: KatyBelle at January 12, 2008 9:50 PM
------------------------------------------------

Saw it recently, it is as good as you remember, it is in fact, better.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 13, 2008 8:36 AM

I too am a follower of the mighty Statham...and have been dreading this movie's release. For as a good follower, I AM COMPELLED!!! to go see it no matter how big a pile of crap it is...

And yes, your Mom isn't alone, I liked Ghost Rider.

Posted by: Adam C at January 13, 2008 11:42 AM

Thanks BS!! I've not seen Lady Hawke since I was about 12, so I'm definitely going to go rent it now.

Posted by: KatyBelle at January 13, 2008 2:49 PM

A lot of the talk about Uwe Boll, I've noticed, is along the lines of "He's like the Ed Wood of the new millennium." And that's stated like it's a bad thing. I honestly believe that Uwe Boll is an auteur in the truest sense of the word. He is also the only filmmaker that works exclusively in the medium of video-game adaptations, and there's definitely something to be said for that. His seemingly complete lack of understanding of the reality that everyone else lives in and his bizarre earnestness make him someone to be admired (from a distance). I mean, he challenged his critics to a boxing match. How do you not love that?

Posted by: Mr. Awesome at January 13, 2008 3:21 PM

Hey Mr. Awes, It's the Pajiba drinking game, not the Pajiba crack smoking game. Baby on what are you tripping? I agree that there is "definitely something to be said for. . .work[ing] exclusively in the medium of video-game adaptations" but what needs to be said is that he should quit doing so. Herr Boll is an "otter" in the "truest sense" only in that he otter quit pursuing his delusion that he can direct a movie. He keeps foisting his cinematic inadequacies on a public that is not even informed that he was the "auteur" of such indefensible pustulence.

Posted by: rudy at January 13, 2008 4:01 PM

In watching the previews my thought always was "That looks stupid but amusing - I'll watch it on DVD." Of course now that you have brought the whole Boll situation, I just might need to reasess that position. Thank you for the warning

Posted by: Brian at January 13, 2008 9:30 PM

You lie sir, despite your disclaimer. You did make up that cast. There's no way that's for real. I somehow manage to avoid all talk of Uwe Boll movies except on Pajiba, and I'm happy to keep it that way.

Posted by: katy at January 14, 2008 12:46 AM

"The orc-pigs are led by a wizard, Gallian (Ray Liotta)"

Heh: Best. Plot. Ever.

So glad that the marketing campaign hasn't made its way into my cultural radar - the first I'd heard of this movie was the fine folks of Pajiba questioning who drew the short straw.

Bad as you say it is I'm driven by some kind of morbid curiosity to find out if that opinion is justified or pure hyperbole... no doubt the movie will... somehow end up on a disc left on my desk... I may submit and watch it with friends while very, very drunk.

Or I may not.

Posted by: Alex the Odd at January 14, 2008 9:35 AM

What has always confused me is how he gets these actors to appear in his movies. I mean, they can't live in a vacuum...they have to know the stigma of a Uwe Boll movie. Nobody can need work that badly, can they? Do they know something we don't, or think they know something we don't?

I'm of the opinion that Uwe Boll movies aren't even worth the time spent illegally downloading them. They're too sad to even make fun of...it's embarrassing to laugh when the Down syndrome kid has trouble saying hello to you. I just find it safer to ignore and avoid altogether...pretend he doesn't exist, and the people he somehow compels to help his travesty of a career were improperly cloned substitutes that were immediately put to death after the movie was made.

Posted by: Shadows of Dakaron at January 14, 2008 12:46 PM

It was like a two-hour episode of Hercules.

My sister & I have a standing Friday movie date. There was nothing out we hadn't seen already, so we were like --eff it-- it'll be good for a laugh, and no one ese will be there. We were wrong on both counts. It wasn't even good for a laugh and the theater was freaking PACKED with RenFaire virgins.

Posted by: Mella at January 14, 2008 1:00 PM

For reasons that shall remain nameless,

I forced my cabin mates to watch Cannonball Run this weekend. And we were just wondering whether Burt Reynolds was still alive -- and here he is! Truly, the mind reels when contemplating this atrocious cast list. Although I suspect that not even this Boll bowel movement could compare to the craptacular mess of the Cannonball Run.

Posted by: CapnGravy at January 14, 2008 2:51 PM

Hey! The Cannonball Run movies were great! Cheesy, full of cars going fast, and Burt and Dom at their best.

Posted by: Shadows of Dakaron at January 14, 2008 3:49 PM

Hold on a second, Rudy. Did you read the second half of my comment. I didn't say I like Uwe because he makes good movies, I said I like him because he's out of his fucking mind. He totally believes in all of his shitty movies. I mean, you can say he's a hack, you can say he's a complete moron, but you can't say he's not dedicated.

Posted by: Mr. Awesome at January 14, 2008 5:43 PM

"except Lillard, who was so bad he may have given me cancer."

i laughed so, so very hard at this.

oh my.

Posted by: CAPSR4COOLKIDS at January 14, 2008 6:28 PM

Jerce - I [heart] SLC Punk so much that in my book - and despite plentiful evidence to the contrary - Matthew Lillard can do no wrong.

I deal with this by not seeing anything else that Lillard is in, ever. I don't think my psyche could take the shock.

Posted by: alanna at January 14, 2008 6:55 PM

It's got Leelee Sobieski, who's like crack to me -- I can't get enough of her, and Claire Forlani who is somehow getting work after Mallrats and remains hot. So I'm gonna punish myself and watch this anyway when it's on video.

Bad choice of words... eeew...

Posted by: Tony at January 14, 2008 7:44 PM

Uwe Boll must have the most dedicated army of yes-men/buttkissers in Hollywood, because despite his pathetic box office record and the near universal disdain for his movies by most major film critics, this guy still believes his movies are genius.

Either that, or he must make his movies so bad on purpose, as if he's trying to say through these bad films that our love for video games is misguided. Perhaps he's just showing us the oftentimes ridiculous nature of the plots and game play associated even the best of our video games, and is attempting to expose these pervasive traits by showing us what they look like when we have to watch them with no control over the action. Maybe he hopes these movies will effect a radical change in the video game world that will force game-makers to infuse their creations with deeper, more serious plots & characters and increasingly innovative & mature game play mechanics, thereby elevating video games from mere entertainment programs with no higher function than to elicit a momentary escape from reality before being sold back to the nearest strip-mall game dealer for store credit towards the next piece of over-hyped brain candy into the beginnings of an actual art form. In other words, perhaps Uwe Boll simply wants video games to grow up.


Nah... This is giving him WAY too much credit. He's just a douche!

Posted by: CarpePancakes! at January 15, 2008 10:15 PM