free counter with statistics Idlewild | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

idlewild.jpg


Why Are We So in Denial When We Know We’re Not Happy Here?

Idlewild / Jeremy C. Fox

Film Reviews | August 25, 2006 | Comments (24)


There’s no denying Outkast’s appeal. With a sound that blends rap with soul, R&B, jazz, and funk and lyrics that range from thoughtful to sexy to mind-bendingly surreal, André Benjamin and Antwan Patton have proven themselves two of the most unpredictably inventive writers and charismatic performers in hip-hop. And those videos — no matter how sick you may be of “Hey Ya!” now, you have to admit you loved it the first 30 times you saw it. So who better to make a musical — especially with a screenplay and direction by Bryan Barber, who directed the videos for “Roses,” “The Way You Move,” and “Hey Ya!” After Moulin Rouge’s gross excesses and utter lack of creativity and the bloated, logy, and inexplicably acclaimed Chicago (Where’s Bebe Neuwirth when you need her, really?), somebody needed to invade Hollywood and make a musical with some genuine vitality and wit. If anyone could do that, I thought, André and Big Boi could.

So maybe no one can. Maybe we should just give up on the genre. Because the evidence at hand just ain’t promising.

If only there were a backslash in the title — Idle/Wild — it would perfectly describe the two halves of the film. The musical numbers are everything you expect from Outkast videos, full of the swooping cameras, agile dancers, and generally over-the-top fun that’s become the hallmark of Barber’s collaborations with the duo. With fantastic choreography by Hinton Battle (a three-time Tony winner, though he’s still best known to many of us as the dancing demon Sweet on “Buffy the Vampire Slayer”), they have tremendous energy, sex appeal, and a good-time vibe that puts at least a couple of them up there with any of the best production numbers in recent films. But the excitement and the jazzy tempo they create is so badly undercut by the framing sequences that they almost might as well be Chicago-dull.

Outside of the musical numbers, Idlewild is nothing more than an old-fashioned crime melodrama, a generic jumble of Prohibition-era gangsters and aspiring musicians — any one storyline instantly recognizable from a dozen other films. Barber’s screenplay gives the performers nothing original or insightful to work with, forcing them to rely on their wits and their natural charm. Some succeed, but not all. As Rooster, a mid-level bootlegger and star attraction at Idlewild, Georgia’s speakeasy The Church, Patton is a fascinating and surprisingly sexual screen presence (though even more impressive is young Rooster, played by the disturbingly precocious 10-year-old Bobb’e J. Thompson). But Benjamin, miscast as a shy and demure pianist, squanders his superhuman charisma. Terrence Howard is chillingly effective as the soulless gangster Trumpy; Macy Gray puts her raspy voice to excellent use as the bawdy, blowsy singer Taffy; and Faizon Love is a convincing blend of desperation and self-importance as the upwardly immobile bootlegger Sunshine Ace. But Cicely Tyson, Ving Rhames, and Ben Vereen are wasted in roles that barely hint at what they can do, and Paula Patton, playing Benjamin’s love interest, has a phony Southern accent and over-the-top manner that would be instantly grating if she weren’t so damn beautiful.

Most of the film’s flaws can be laid at Barber’s feet, but he still has a lot on the ball, particularly for a director making his first feature. As in his videos, the visual stylization makes for consistently enjoyable eye candy, and it meshes seamlessly with the magic realism and historical mishmash that allow hip-hop and animated fantasies to exist comfortably alongside Prohibition and the most exuberant swing dancing I’ve seen since those old Gap ads. The problem with Idlewild is that it feels like for every opportunity Barber pursued he neglected two others.

Jeremy C. Fox is a founding critic of Pajiba and a member of the Online Film Critics Society.You may email him at jeremycfox[at]gmail.com.

ofcs.gif


Trust the Man | Quiet, The



Comments

awwe, I have to agree with alot of this review but I actually enjoyed the movie. It could've been brighter but I think that it was a decent film and it managed to exceed my expectations.

Posted by: alice at August 26, 2006 1:39 AM

Cool, that kid from That's So Raven in it! I'll check this movie out...when it comes to my college campus. Or DVD.

Posted by: Penny Woods at August 26, 2006 9:07 AM

I agree with the review. Although not the perfect movie, still one that stands leagues apart from the rest of the pack. Finally a movie that lived up to its hype. We all expected a flop... this movie is no where close.

Posted by: Web O Naut at August 26, 2006 10:30 AM

"Just want to make you cum-aah"

Yeah, that's one real deep lyricist there.

Posted by: vincent at August 26, 2006 11:18 AM

Right... it succeeds in being different and in being cool, it just fails at being great.

Except the young Rooster. You're right--he was perfect. It was scary.

Posted by: Melissa at August 26, 2006 11:54 AM

Don't Parker and Stone make musicals with genuine vitality and wit all the time?

Also, I love rap. Old school, gangsta, underground, you name it, and I never really got the whole Outkast thing. I like a few of their older tunes, but I never liked Hey Ya, not even the first time I heard it. There's a tendency to equate "different" and "narrower appeal" with "better" and "more intelligent," and I just don't think it holds weight and Outkast is a perfect example why.

Posted by: Eep at August 26, 2006 12:20 PM

As a black person living in Canada, I've never understood the near-santification that has accompanied fictional accounts of the Prohibition era by black entertainers. Before you start, no one has to give me the speech about 'reclaiming', of the past and all, and I'm not saying that anyone should go to lengths to self-flagellate over it. People can do whatever they want with their art, but doesn't the spate of recent pieces of this ilk in different media (for lack of a better word)whitewash the past? It is fiction and all, but it's kind of jarring to see so many black entertainers seemingly feed into, and disseminate notions of history that don't do much more than toe the party line. God help us if a generation of kids grows up thinking that the period was little more in the way of struggle or historical zeitgeist than Cotton Club gloss and proto gansta-rapper braggadoccio and posturing.

That said, I guess no one's going to see a film like this for detailed study of the period, and there are any number of films, books et al., that deal with this material in other ways, so I give on that point. I wouldn't be naive enough to think that all entertainment should be edifying, or that it's anyone's job to conflate entertainment with reseach, but you know, I was thinking, is all. Maybe I'm too much a product of my own culture to be able to understand the fascination and trend.

Posted by: M at August 26, 2006 1:09 PM

Hmmmm...I really liked Chicago so maybe I'll like this too. But since I don't actually go see movies anymore, I'll look forward to the DVD.

Posted by: Katy at August 26, 2006 2:57 PM

Can I say that I actually enjoyed Moulin Rouge? Or is it a punishable offense?

Posted by: ~Moi~ at August 26, 2006 9:01 PM

Don't worry, Moi. I loved both Moulin Rouge and Chicago. I knew they weren't especially good, or edifying, but hot damn I loved them.


I'm such a musical whore. XP

Posted by: anaxa at August 26, 2006 9:21 PM

Moi, I loved Moulin Rouge! (mostly for Ewan, but eh, who's counting), but for the most part hated Chicago. Actually, no, what I hated was the fact that Moulin Rouge was the more original story, but Chicago got the buttload of Oscars.

Posted by: em at August 28, 2006 10:15 AM

For those Outkast haters up there (or just the "meh" sayers...oh, man. It's not like I can vouch for everything they've ever done (Stankonia kinda stank and even though I loved Speakboxx/The Love Below it does seem like there's already a ferment going on with Andre and Boi), but Southernplayalisticaddilacmusic and especially Aquemini were so exciting creatively...the skits, the music, the subjects they covered...the way they could be honest in their lyrics without sacrificing their creative joy...in fact that seemed to _be_ the point of their music, instead of trying to make money or get a serious message across. They never seemed to take themselves too seriously, but they took playing around in the studio very seriously and for that I have loooved them. I don't expect too much from Idlewild...they seem to have already lost their creative momentum as a duo, but they have put out some really great work in the past.

And while I'm sticking up for my boys, fuck you, Vincent. I shouldn't take your easy and inaccurate pot shot seriously, but the line you picked is from a song about a fear of intimacy. That's a pretty great topic for a pop song.

Posted by: Deanna at August 28, 2006 3:37 PM

Well said Deanna.

"Return of the Gangsta"

Posted by: B_A_N at August 28, 2006 5:39 PM

Chicago is OK and Moulin Rouge gets better upon successive viewings, but "Hedwig and the Angry Inch" is far superior.

To get a real feel of what "Hey Ya" is really about, check out Mat Weddle's version of it on You Tube.

(can I link?


I'll probably see Idlewild for the dance numbers.

Posted by: pkitty at August 29, 2006 1:20 AM

Chicago is OK and Moulin Rouge gets better upon successive viewings, but "Hedwig and the Angry Inch" is far superior.

To get a real feel of what "Hey Ya" is really about, check out Mat Weddle's version of it on You Tube.

(can I link? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ioKEDgnfs8)


I'll probably see Idlewild for the dance numbers.

Posted by: pkitty at August 29, 2006 1:20 AM

Chicago was more entertaining than anything. Richard Gere and Catherine Zeta-Jones in a musical puhlease! I agree Moulin Rouge was better with successive viewings and I enjoyed the "Roxanne" cover. I kept rewinding it. Idlewild, I'll catch it on DVD being the Musical Whore I will always be.

Posted by: Neo at August 29, 2006 11:27 AM

Actually Catherine Zeta-Jones started out on stage in London doing musical theater...so puhlease, what?
I thought Richard Gere did pretty good considering.

But gone are the days of "Guys and Dolls" and "Singing in the Rain". I love the classics and the true talent that was seen in them.

I will definitely see this...it just looks fun.

Posted by: Nikigrl at August 29, 2006 2:29 PM

I totally forgot about Cicely Tyson playing basically Miss Jane Pittman!... I totally agree that they squandered the elder statesmen actors (I was praying that Ben Vereen got to at least SING something) but the movie is a good time. Macy Gray is awesome. Terrence Howard really leaves most of the rest of the cast in the dust, but the Kast themselves aren't too bad... the love story was extremely lame, though, and hard to get through. The musical sequences, though, are top-notch and the songs are great. For my black musicals, though, I'm going to stick with STORMY WEATHER, and just watch the Outkast videos and create my own storylines in my imagination instead.

Posted by: terebi at August 29, 2006 4:13 PM

I had a feeling this would be an overdone period piece. However, I bet the singing was good, and it is probably more bearable to watch then Moulin Rouge, which gave me a giant headache. Sorry, I can't appreciate movie renditions of cheezy 80s songs, it's just too horrible to contemplate...

Posted by: Gina at August 29, 2006 8:58 PM

There's a tendency to equate "different" and "narrower appeal" with "better" and "more intelligent," and I just don't think it holds weight.....

I agree with this in general, despite the fact that I love Outkast, but it's ironic such a statement is uttered on Pajiba.

Anyway, I do plan to check out Idlewild on DVD!

Also, I dare say that Moulin Rouge was no more original than Chicago. Both stories were more or less cliché.

Posted by: Daphne at August 30, 2006 5:50 PM

How can anyone say that Moulin Rouge was original? The story was ripped straight from La Boheme, then beaten so heavily with the knowing pop-culture / bright lights / music video stick it could barely crawl away weeping and limping.

Posted by: Smith at September 1, 2006 4:17 AM

Saw the preview for this the other night and two things might have made me insist on seeing it:
1. Billy Dee Williams
2. period music. It's all about context...let Macy Gray sing "A Pig's Foot and a Bottle of Beer". Now there's me some lyrics!

Posted by: justK at September 1, 2006 9:05 AM

"How can anyone say that Moulin Rouge was original? The story was ripped straight from La Boheme,"
-- yeah, so what? like cinema and opera (including the book for La Boheme) does all the time to good effect.

"then beaten so heavily with the knowing pop-culture / bright lights / music video stick it could barely crawl away weeping and limping."
---- So..if I understand it, you dont want fabulous, you want to watch "C.S.I.- the musical"?

The film is 'guilty' of a referenced, self-contained, believable fantasy aesthetic of its own - thats no crime for a musical, thats an essential foundation.

Posted by: art at September 3, 2006 7:02 PM

I found the movie entertaining with its high enery dance numbers. So what if the movie was somewhat lame in its storyline. It was still different from what is playing now in the theaters. And that is what outkast is different and I love them for it.

Posted by: Ms Lynn at September 6, 2006 6:18 PM