free counter with statistics I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry | Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

adam_sandler3.jpg
King of Queers

I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry / Dustin Rowles

Film Reviews | July 20, 2007 | Comments (107)


Are you like me? Are you tired of the sudden growth of films that treat homosexuals as actual people with actual, complex emotions? Isn’t it disgusting? It’s vile, right? Hetero-torture porn. I mean the way, for instance, that Brokeback Mountain depicted two men not only falling in love with one another, but actually doing the anal tango? Blech! It’s an affront to God-fearing breeders like you and me, am I right? Can you believe the studios are cramming that shit down our throats? Subjecting us to an immoral, heathenistic lifestyle? Seriously: I think I just threw up in my sphincter a little. It’s uncalled for — the plumbing just doesn’t work. If God wanted men to use the rear door, he would’ve stitched on an ass labia. Am I right? There’s a reason God invented AIDS, and it wasn’t so that cubicle monkeys could guilt you into ponying up $5 to sponsor a co-worker’s effort to walk around a track a few miles and wear a pretty ribbon. (Clearly, the walk-a-thon industry was behind the spread of the disease).

That’s why a movie like I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry is so refreshing in today’s studio marketplace. It’s a classic comedy throwback to films like the side-splittingly funny Boat Trip or bit characters in Bruckheimer films, like Anthony Clark’s gay hairdresser in The Rock. Hell, I haven’t seen a take on the queer lifestyle this funny since Mr. Roper retired his limp wrist after “Three’s Company” ended its run. And what’s really smart about Chuck and Larry is that it doesn’t try to make us feel uncomfortable or squeamish by introducing gay characters that heterosexuals might find relatable — there’s no intimacy (thank God, too — I understand the MPAA gives R ratings to films that feature guys making out) or anything that really offers the sickening impression that gays are real people (shudder). Instead, gays are depicted as gays should be: Screaming queens, effeminate flamers who wear butterfly costumes, sing “I’m Every Woman” in the shower, and listen to George Michael and Queen. You know: Punchlines to sodomy jokes. People we can sort of shove off into society’s corner and laugh at occasionally during an episode of “Will and Grace,” but not anyone with whom we’d actually hang out or share a beer. I hope that doesn’t make me sound homophobic or anything, because really I’m not— seriously, I have a gay friend. And he told me that gays don’t drink beer, anyway.

The genius of I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry is in its premise: Two male firefighters, Chuck (Adam Sandler) and Larry (Kevin James), get hitched so that they can share domestic partner benefits. And therein lies the comedic gold: There are no gay firefighters in America. I mean, seriously: Who would believe that? Firemen shower together. They hold big hoses and shake them around merrily. They slide down freakin’ poles, people. Gay people don’t do that. And that’s why Chuck and Larry works — we’re never led to believe that homosexuality is an actual threat to our nation’s fire departments, because if there’s one thing that I couldn’t bear, it’s the notion that some muscle-bound chubby chaser might pull me from 20 foot flames and bring me to safety (seriously: If there are gay fireman out there and you’re called to my house, just let me and my family perish with a little dignity, please). The thought makes me sick, and it makes Bruce Springsteen sick, too.

Chuck is one of those awesome guys who hangs out at Hooters (have you tasted their wings!) and has sex with twins (Boo-Yah!) until his best friend at the fire department, Larry, saves his life. In exchange, Chuck agrees to marry him so that he can become the beneficiary of Larry’s estate in the event of his death, a measure he takes to protect his two kids, one of whom is every father’s worst nightmare: A preadolescent homo-chicken chaser who sings show tunes, dances, and squeals when he sees porn. After a sweetastic orgy with, like, 12 Hooters chicks and his bombshell doctor, Chuck reluctantly agrees, so long as their pact remains their secret shame.

Unfortunately, a gay inspector of some sort begins probing (ha! No pun intended) around into their arrangement, forcing the two to not only cohabitate but to make their partnership official, which they do by traveling to Canada and getting hitched in a civil ceremony conducted by a hilarious Japanese guy who can’t pronounce his Ls (I didn’t even realize, until the credits began to roll, that the Japanese guy was actually the Greatest Actor of Our Generation, Rob Schneider). They also hire a lawyer, played by Jessica Biel (woo hoo! Boobies! Boobies!), to help them defend their arrangement. Chuck, because he appreciates a nice rack when he sees one, actually ends up falling for the lawyer, which creates all sorts of friction in Chuck and Larry’s fake marriage, with expected comedic results. Later, even Chuck and Larry’s buddies at the fire department disown them, thinking that they’re actually gay (as they have every right to do — you don’t want some dude grabbing your ass while you’re in the trenches, am I right? And those gays are completely indiscriminate when it comes to men — a dick is a dick. That’s what my gay friend told me, anyway).

The script, rewritten by Alexander Payne and Jim Taylor (Sideways, About Schmidt, Election) is thankfully toned down considerably by Barry Fanaro’s mainstream handiwork. Unfortunately, around the time that Larry tries to prove a point with his fire department with some rhetorical sarcasm (don’t you hate that — it’s so fucking obnoxious), Chuck and Larry starts to unravel, as Payne’s original intent starts to seep through a little bit: Something about tolerance for gays, a sermonizing message I tried to block out, which wasn’t that hard to do because the film seemed to suggest that homos are only mildly tolerable if they’re of the masculine variety, like Ving Rhames, a sentiment I sort of agree with. I mean, if you have to ride the dude train, at least be a gay guy who watches baseball and wears track suits, am I right? That way, I don’t know about it and the property values in my neighborhood aren’t affected. The problem I had with the sermon, however, was that Sandler’s Chuck outright suggested that “faggot” wasn’t an acceptable way to refer to gays. Well, that’s bullshit. Just ask my gay friend.

There is a scene during the last few minutes, however, when it looks like Chuck and Larry is about to go pear shape, during one of those awesome courtroom scenes that Sandler films have a tendency to utilize, when the gay inspector (Steve Buscemi) insists that Chuck and Larry kiss to prove their love to one another. And they almost do it, too — something that probably would’ve had me and half the audience in Ithaca’s new Regal 14 (today was the grand opening!) barfing up our very heterosexual breakfast foodstuffs onto the shiny new carpet. Fortunately, their lips never touch, saving the theater from a grand opening carpet-cleaning catastrophe. I go to the movies to escape the ails of this great country of ours, not to confront them. So, just to put all of your minds at ease, I offer this tiny spoiler: No men actually kiss in Chuck and Larry. As a nation, we’re just not ready for it — and God willing — we’ll never be.

Rick Santorum in ‘08!

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. Whenever Rob Schneider is in a film, he can’t help but to resort to hyperbole. He lives with his wife and son in Ithaca, New York. You may email him, or leave a comment below.









Sunshine | Hairspray


Comments

Simply brilliant, sir. Why did I think, at one time, that this film might not turn into a parade of stereotypes and actually be decent?

Posted by: Ben at July 20, 2007 3:58 PM

Dustin:

Your sarcasm is duly noted.

Posted by: Blackcapricorn at July 20, 2007 3:59 PM

I just peed myself laughing so hard. And not in a gay watersports kind of way either. Brilliant review, as always. Glad the lack of sleep hasn't gone to your head.

Posted by: Monkeyboy at July 20, 2007 3:59 PM

I guess this was kind of expected. Oh well.

Posted by: JustJoe at July 20, 2007 4:00 PM

Despite your love of the art of (and obvious gift for) writing, I am sooooo sorry you had to endure that film! It astonishes me that some people actually think that Adam Sandler will one day take his head out of his ass when in fact it's further in than ever before. On second thought, maybe that's why he keeps making these movies: he can't hear us!

I hope you took a long, relaxing and cleansing shower after seeing this!

Posted by: Scott at July 20, 2007 4:03 PM

Thank you. This was one of the best reasons to remain literate in the 21st century. I mean it, this review belongs in the "Best of Pajiba" section. And a very belated (I wasn't able to post the last few days) welcome to L'il Pajiba!

Posted by: Menelaos at July 20, 2007 4:10 PM

Even if you are a rancher, there is something to be said about not watching a horse defecate and expecting to see gold bricks.

Just saying.

Posted by: Jeremy, but not that Jeremy at July 20, 2007 4:12 PM

Talk about sacrifice. Thanks for taking the hit and watching this swill. Even the trailer made me want to vomit my bisexual breakfast foodstuffs onto my requisite "I'm in a lesbian relationship" two cats.

Posted by: Sharon at July 20, 2007 4:13 PM

I had said in a previous review I would feel bad for the guy having to watch this. Now, I don't have to anymore.

Two things that are bugging me:

1) How would marrying Chuck help Larry's kids? And why isn't the government saving these kids from the gays? I mean, that one kid is already gone, but the other one can still be salvaged right?

2) When did Queen get declared only for gays? I know about Freddie Mercury, but do I now have to question my masculinity whenever I start rocking out to "Princes of the Universe"? Thanks for letting me know this late in the game!

Posted by: Vermillion at July 20, 2007 4:16 PM

I get it, the movie was not sympathetic to the gay community. Were there funny parts? Redeeming values? All I take from this review is that if I were gay I'd be offended. Thanks for wasting my time, because I probably could have figured that out for myself.

Posted by: Patrick at July 20, 2007 4:17 PM

A nitpick - Mr. Furley, as played by Don Knotts, was the flamboyant landlord on Three's Company. Mr. Roper was married to a woman, and was simply too gruff to be even a closeted bi-sexual.

Pop culture references can be our friend, but only when we use 'em correctly.

*wink*

Very true, Mohaski. But it was Mr. Roper who mocked Jack for being gay with his own gay impersonation, which included the limp wrist and frequent references to Jack as "tinkerbell," among other things. The reference is as intended. -- DR

Posted by: Mohaski at July 20, 2007 4:21 PM

And those gays are completely indiscriminate when it comes to men -- a dick is a dick.

I'm glad you didn't forget to mention the other thing that ALL gay men ALWAYS do, which is suggestively eye all straight men like the pieces of meat that they are. Isn't that a hobby of theirs?

I hope you took a long, relaxing and cleansing shower after seeing this!

No, I hope you let Mrs. Pajiba-hyphenate take a long, relaxing shower like she probably much deserves ; )

Posted by: katy at July 20, 2007 4:28 PM

patrick,
to paraphrase the british version of the office, 'why is it that only gay people should be offended by gay jokes?' i think dustin's point was that the movie was offensive to everyone who isn't an asshat, and there are no redeeming qualities or funny parts. just ass-hat-ed-ness.

Posted by: groanygirl at July 20, 2007 4:32 PM

Dustin: You know how I know your gay? You like Chuck and Larry.

Posted by: jp at July 20, 2007 4:35 PM

Dustin: Hats off to you, sir. Brilliant.

I have been forced to sit through this trailer so many times before better movies. It gives me a burning sensation in my soul. I did not know that the phrase "seeing red" literally describes an actual phenomenon.

Honestly, I find this movie - concept, execution, everything - so offensive that I can't even be articulate about it. (Also: Yeah, because domestic partner benefits are so easy to get.) I'm just going to omit the rest of this comment because it'd be one [redacted] after another.

Posted by: alanna at July 20, 2007 4:38 PM

Grimly hilarious review, Dustin, and that ain't an easy combo. I watched "Reign Over Me" the other night and thought, "This Adam Sandler fella isn't such a bad guy." Turns out, he is in fact a total douchebag. Any modicum of humor or halfhearted "redeeming values" seems pretty irrelevant in the face of how destructive this kind of bullshit is to the rights of millions of people.

And heck, Vermillion, when did George Michael get declared only for gay folks? I still shake it to "I Want Your Sex" whilst barbecuing catapulted squirrel and swilling uber-hetero warm gin, much to Mrs. socalled's chagrin.

(BTW, Dustin, I'm ENDLESSLY tickled to see this in the sign-off: "He lives with his wife and son . . . .")

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at July 20, 2007 4:40 PM

You know what's so funny about this movie? That it features two straight actors playing straight guys who pretend to be gay! So funny that those straight actors can play gay! Now that's acting. Straight actors! Who like pussy and boobies. Did you know that Kevin James and Adam Sandler are straight? Yeah, it's true. And they play gay! Comedy gold.

Posted by: Cara at July 20, 2007 4:42 PM

The thought makes me sick, and it makes Bruce Springsteen sick, too.

(Just thought it deserved to be in print a second time.)

Posted by: superEdna at July 20, 2007 4:43 PM

Yeah, what someone up there said: how does being a gay couple help the one guy's kids? Is this some special nonexistent rule of the NYFD, something that only happens in movies so that movies can be made for the express purpose of pointing out how icky gay people are? Please advise.

Posted by: LL at July 20, 2007 4:45 PM

I can't wait to see the lesbian version of this movie. Surely a sequel will follow. "I Now Pronounce You Debbie and Sally," or something like that.

Posted by: LL at July 20, 2007 4:48 PM

Bwaa!

Posted by: Julie at July 20, 2007 4:52 PM

Does this also mean Melissa Etheridge is off limits for me?

Sandler has not been funny since Happy Gilmore and Billy Madison. Pretty much everything "funny" since has been nothing but a soul-killing experience. Will someone stop him from making another movie and take Ben Stiller out as well?

Excellent usage of sarcasm sir. Sarcasm is highly underrated tool in today's world and an oft-perfected one. I will not be seeing this but instead looking at my pre-purchased tickets for The Simpsons Movie (Midnight showing next Thursday!). I will likely save more brain cells that way.

Posted by: Melody at July 20, 2007 4:54 PM

Hopefully with this review, Santorum's campaign can pick up some steam! Wooo! Down with intelligent people like Dan Savage!

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at July 20, 2007 4:55 PM

Re the supposed reason they have to "act gay," I read that Larry forgot to change his pension beneficiary after his wife died, so his children would get nothing if he gets killed on the job. So he has to remarry, etc., etc., bobloblaw, just-shoot-me-in-the-fucking-face-already-dick-cheney.

Of course it's complete fucking nonsense -- if his wife were gone, the intestacy law of every jurisdiction in the U.S. would pass the benefits to their surviving children. It's just an IQ-of-15 construct that Citizen John Q. R-Tard will accept so that he can laugh at the flamers.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at July 20, 2007 4:57 PM

I don't get the whole premise of the movie. Can't hetero people marry for convenience? Why wouldn't a same-sex couple be able to do the same?

Am I just being to practical?

Posted by: seaturtles007 at July 20, 2007 5:02 PM

LL -- I also would like to see the lesbian version of this movie, since I have two cats, and I found out by reading this comment thread that this means I'm in a lesbian relationship. Can't wait to find out who with!

By the way, because of this website, "King of Wishful Thinking" has been stuck in my mind all week. Just wanted to say thanks!

Posted by: Wendi at July 20, 2007 5:09 PM

I've given up on Adam Sandler completely. I liked the Wedding Singer and 50 First Dates but I'm pretty sure it's only because Drew Barrymore was in them. When I read this review I can't help but think of Blades of Glory, where the homoeroticism was maybe once the butt of the joke and wonder if this movie is putting gay rights in America back another 20 years. I think Adam needs to pass the torch of wierdly-successful-despite-being-ugly male comedian with a brat-pack type entourage to Will Ferral. I mean, at least Will doesn't ALWAYS have to appeal to the lowest common comedic denominator.

Posted by: Starbuck at July 20, 2007 5:10 PM

True story: A few months ago I saw the trailer for this while on a date. My date laughed hysterically throughout the entire trailer while I sat there stone-faced, in shock at both the trailer and him. When it ended he turned to me and asked "didn't I think that was funny?", and oh, by the way, he couldn't wait to see it. At that precise moment the date ended for me.

So it turns out this is exactly what I thought it would be. Great review though.

Posted by: audrey at July 20, 2007 5:25 PM

Homosexuality is so gay!

Posted by: Sarah Cynthia Sylvia Stout at July 20, 2007 5:28 PM

I have really bad news for you Dustin. The sarcastic, pretending to like it review where you act like some idiot douchbag who likes this stuff, is getting pretty tired. In fact, I would go as far as to say that it's just as tired and annoying as the very film you are attempting to mock. Please, next time you review something like this just blast it in a straightforward kind of way and dispense with the cutsie/clever role playing. It really isn't bitchy or scathing.

Posted by: jbrader at July 20, 2007 5:38 PM

I have really bad news for you jbrader-one person's opinion isn't exactly really bad news at all, not for someone who writes whatever the hell he wants on his own site, and especially not for those who visit this site for the type of humor demonstrated in the above review.

Posted by: Julie at July 20, 2007 5:46 PM

Rick Santorum can blow me.

Lovely review, matey!

Posted by: Bianca Reagan at July 20, 2007 5:55 PM

Damnit Dustin! I'm tired of you pushing your gay agenda here! We all know the Pajiblet birth was faked and you secretly live in San Francisco with Seth.

Who else would review Chuck and Larry? A gay.
Who would make a reference to Brokeback Mountain? A gay.
Who would choose the monicker "Dustin Rowles", knowing full well it's gay code for "I like to have large pieces of fruit crammed into my rectum followed by a whip cream enema"? A gay.

Posted by: Manny at July 20, 2007 6:12 PM

Who else would review Chuck and Larry? A gay.

etc. etc.

Says the guy who blogs about Ecstacy and glow sticks.

Posted by: Vermillion at July 20, 2007 6:24 PM

After reading the name "Rob Schneider," my curiosity to see just how bad this movie could get went right out the window. That man has absolutely no taste whatsoever.

Posted by: bonnie at July 20, 2007 6:37 PM

Oh, I'm all tingly. I do love the reviews dripping in sarcasm, although I admit that I went WTF? - just for a nanosecond! - when I read the first sentence, thinking that I had entered some sort of weird, alternative reality Pajiba (or would that be Abijab?).

I quickly came to my senses. Thanks for pinch-hitting, once again, not that I was going to see it anyway. My blinding, seething hatred of Adam Sandler eliminates all rational thought and desire to see anything with him in it. Kevin James had my goodwill in Hitch, but it's dissipating - quickly.

Posted by: Daphne at July 20, 2007 6:44 PM

For the record, Dustin, I thought this was the best example of the pretend-to-be-a-douche schtick you've ever used.

Posted by: Ricki at July 20, 2007 7:04 PM

Is it wrong that I want to see this just so I can look at Jessica Biel's ass?

I do have two cats...

Posted by: lunabelle at July 20, 2007 7:28 PM

Lunabelle took the words right out of my mouth. I don't think it's a coincidence that Ms. Biel's ridiculous body is featured in the trailers.

Posted by: bartap at July 20, 2007 7:37 PM

My best friend works as a background artist and is gay. But apparently he didn't "look gay enough" to work as an extra in this. Har har har.

Posted by: Gudrun at July 20, 2007 7:40 PM

This has looked lame from the get-go, but I shall have to go see it anyways, just to gaze longingly at Jessica Biel's exquisite ass.

Posted by: canology at July 20, 2007 7:59 PM

ROFLMAO and all sorts of l33t-speak for "cackling so hard I peed myself...twice." I can't wait have to sit through this dreck when my dear employers decide to put it in their video-on-demand service! If only "quality control" also applied to content...

On a more serious note, where can I get a t-shirt that says "Mrs. Gyllenhaal"?

Posted by: Eddo at July 20, 2007 8:54 PM

Heh. It wasn't until you "didn't recognize" a Rob Schneider performance in an Adam Sandler movie that I realized the total committment to the writing style.

Awesome.

Posted by: hoorah at July 20, 2007 9:23 PM

Wait, Ving Rhames is gay? Did I miss something? Or is that just a reference to his rather unfortunate meeting with the Gimp in Pulp Fiction? Just wondering...

Oh, and Alexander Payne - I am very disappointed in you.

Posted by: GreenMyEyes at July 20, 2007 9:31 PM

Goddammit. I am confused and conflicted. (Am I a gay???)

No seriously...it's movies like this shitty shit and then movies good/decent ones like Reign Over Me, Spanglish, Punch Drunk...that make Sandler all his money. He does shit like this and then a good movie. Shit. Good. Shit. Good. He endears himself to the meayneck fratboys during one half of the year, and then does something with a ilttle bit of heart and substance in it during the other half.

I was hoping this movie was going to be one of those ones that could pull both and that they only cut together the gay jokes into the trailor to attract the meatheads and that maybe another would surface showing good parts. I wanted this movie to be like that sooooooo badly. I pictures this movie and being a commentary about how your typical, machismo guy views the sterotypical homosexual male and then goes through a handful of emotions/experiences that show him nd the audience that everyone goes through the same experiences and emotions when it comes to being together and being in love. I still have to see this movie so that maybe if I try hard enough i can find that attempt in there to do just that...I dunno...help me. I'll just wait til video.

I fuckin hate it when what I hope a movie will be turns out not...fuck these fucking fuckers.

Posted by: PissBoy at July 20, 2007 9:31 PM

Dustin, you guys are on a roll. First, the fury-laden review of Captivity, the hilrious real time review of Rock of Love (or whatever it's called) and now the snarky-ness of Chuck and Larry. You guys are kicking ass with your reviews.

Adam Sandler is such a disappointment to me. I realize that I think about it, he's played the exact SAME character in all of his films, with Billy Madison and Happy Gilmore being the only funny ones, IMO. The rest, he usually has a great supporting cast (well, most of the time) but a shitty plot and an even shittier conclusion. It's just pathetic.

Manny, is that true? Dustin and Seth? Well, Seth's moniker is "The TV Whore." Perhaps that has something to do with it. LOL.

Posted by: Brie at July 20, 2007 10:09 PM

Nice use of irony for your review, Dustin. As a gay teenager, I was hoping this movie would be just a little more socially conscious, and be able to handle the issues of gay rights and homophobia in a way people my age could understand. But apparently, I was wrong. Mind you, I have a pretty good sense of humour about myself, but the balance between gay jokes and gay rights seems somewhat one sided. Oh Fucking Joy. That being said, we can at least give Sandler and James the participation ribbon for at least trying.

BTW, "Faggot" is like the n-word, but for gays. That being said, we're pretty good at telling the difference between a joke and homophobia, so don't worry too much about using it.

Posted by: Jeremy at July 20, 2007 10:24 PM

almost Threw up in my sphcinter, great line as always great great writing

Posted by: pasadenamike at July 20, 2007 10:28 PM

Who could have read this script and given it the green light? Who could have read this script and signed a contract to perform in it? I mean, wasn't it obvious to rational folk that this movie would never end up being anything other than absolute shit?

Bueller? anyone?

Posted by: Que Barbara at July 20, 2007 10:41 PM

The disdain Hollywood holds for the "average American" is shameful.

Posted by: Chris at July 20, 2007 10:47 PM

I saw this movie a couple years ago when it was still called Strange Bedfellows.

Brilliant review. I need a cigarette.

Posted by: Mara at July 20, 2007 11:30 PM

Um, now I just want to know about Ving Rhames too.

Otherwise, I couldn't give two shits about this terrible movie. Adam Sandler needs to stay home and count his money and stop inflicting this stuff on innocent moviegoers.

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at July 20, 2007 11:33 PM

yeah i can totally relate with this, people just dont get that america doesnt need to be socially tollerant towards these people, and films like these proves how great that is- that we can come together and laugh about them, i mean what else could they ask us for? beautiful review, all my friends agree and we're going to see it tonight


(eddo- i want that shirt too, im betting the onyl way to get it is to get it custom made and buy a bunch in bulk if you need another person to pitch in, i'm in)

Posted by: MAx at July 20, 2007 11:44 PM

Green My Eyes & Anne, I think Dustin is talking about "Holiday Heart", an awful, borderline campy movie with Ving Rhames as a gay transvestite who takes in a homeless girl and her mother during the holidays. While he takes care of them, his heart and feelings open up, and blah, blah, blah. A sad piece of shit, really.

Posted by: Brie at July 21, 2007 1:14 AM

BRA-VO, Dustin.

I hope this movie crawls into the furthest corner of the dollar cineplex genre, withers and dies. (Painfully, if possible.)

Posted by: K at July 21, 2007 1:44 AM

I gotta say as a review this was a piece of shit, totally useless. As parody, this was amusing but I've read Jonathan Swift before, Dustin, and sarcasm only lasts so long before it loses it's point and just starts beating you over the head with its message, no matter now noble it is.

So yeah, try incoporating an actual review next time, not just a rant on intolerance, which anyone with any gray matter between their ears could have figured would have been heavily relied upon in a movie where the guy from the waterboy (another film that in no way stereotypes Canjuns as mentally challenged *sarcasm*wink*wink*did you catch that*nudge*nudge*) is your moral compass.

Just review the movie, fuck

Posted by: colin at July 21, 2007 1:59 AM

Being the die-hard optimist that I am, I was hoping beyond hope that there would be some weird parable in this movie that moved people towards acceptance of the gay community, and maybe someone would get his comeuppance in the end for being a heartless asshole by making a mockery of domestic partnerships. God, I just cringe at the fact that people have spent decades trying to get partner benefits (which are still not available to every gay couple) only to have some horrible movie ridicule the idea. Yeah, it's really funny when a person can't see his or her loved one on their deathbed because he or she is in a same sex relationship which some places still don't recognize as being legitimate. Yeah, really fucking funny.

And, I swear to sweet baby Jesus, that if I see one more movie with some crazy effeminate man as the single representation of the gay community, I am going to move to Canada. And, this time I mean it! Fuck, I hate Hollywood.

Posted by: Gigi Worthington at July 21, 2007 2:44 AM

Thanks for the review and the entertaining sarcasm. My only question about this whole offensive, stupid movie is how in the HELL did Alexander Payne and Jim Taylor write this? They are responsible for 4 of the best, smartest and most thoughtful comedies in the past 15 years (Citizen Ruth, Election, About Schmidt and Sideways) and now they are writing claptrap like this? How???? Why???? WTF????

Deep in my heart I want to believe that they originally wrote a hilarious, thought-provoking and deeply scathing script that somehow got severely fucked up by a movie studio who felt the inclusion of award-winning talents like Adam Sandler, Kevin James, Tom Shadyac and Dennis Dugan could only make an Alexander Payne & Jim Taylor script even better. Actually after seeing those names all beside each other, it´s obvious that 2 of these things are not like the other. Maybe my theory actually is what happened. Still though, I will be eyeing the next Payne & Taylor film release with extreme caution and trepidation.

Posted by: Tallsonofagun at July 21, 2007 5:16 AM

my politically polar opposite best friend wants to see this with me and after reading this I think I have to absolutely refuse it.

I was being SOOO stupid for thinking this could havee a chance of being good or real or Jessica Biel ass could save this one.

movie like this is the reason why writers should get more power. If only Alexander Payne had more say in this (Am I being optimistic?)

Posted by: yocean at July 21, 2007 5:40 AM

Is it me, or are Colin and Patrick completely missing the point of this site?

Boys, it's right there at the top - scathing and bitchy.

Posted by: Simon B at July 21, 2007 10:01 AM

I take it there's no anal Sandler on James action then.

That's a missed opportunity.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at July 21, 2007 10:35 AM

In the spirit of hilarity, apparently Eli Roth has written MSN a letter about their review of Captivity. Pretty amusing.

Posted by: Melody at July 21, 2007 11:33 AM

But, BarbadoSlim, there is! At Pretty on the outside........

It's pretty gay though.

Posted by: CRB at July 21, 2007 11:37 AM

What the HELL is wrong with Alexander Payne?? I sure hope he made a lot of money, because ew...

Posted by: demondoll at July 21, 2007 11:46 AM

I'm going to come to colin and patrick's defense on this one.
As Dustin has demonstrated several times prior, there are many, many ways to be scathing and bitchy without doing what he has done above. Though the satire was brilliant and touches several important issues, I didn't have to sit through the whole movie to realize that Chuck and Larry might be offensive to the gay community. Though this review has buttressed that original assumption, it doesn't really cover any other scathing or bitchy territory that I might have anticipated (and enjoyed) - commentary on the man, Adam Sandler? Commentary on the writers' turn from more poignant films to this?

This wasn't an awful review, and I wouldn't even call it bad. It just didn't really tell me anything I couldn't already have realized just from simply knowing the premise of the film.

Posted by: Sharon at July 21, 2007 2:09 PM

Wendi said: I also would like to see the lesbian version of this movie, since I have two cats, and I found out by reading this comment thread that this means I'm in a lesbian relationship. Can't wait to find out who with!

I was the only one who knew this? Hell, I'll post it again, maybe it will be used as a plot point in another movie that I hate. THE STEREOTYPICAL LESBIAN EQUATION: 2 > cats = lesbian. There's also one dealing with flannel, but it's more complex.

Posted by: Sharon at July 21, 2007 3:12 PM

yocean said:

I was being SOOO stupid for thinking this could havee a chance of being good or real or Jessica Biel ass could save this one.

But... Jessica Biel's ass can save anything! I mean, it made Blade: Trinity bearable.

I figured this movie would be like "Blah, blah, blah [Adam Sandler pretends to be gay] blah, blah, blah [cue angelic chorus] Jessica Biel's ass, blah blah blah [Sandleresque non-hilarious hijinx] blah blah blah [cue angelic chorus] Jessica Biel's ass, etc etc...

Hmmm, maybe I should just wait for the DVD and skip the "blah, blah" parts...

Posted by: canology at July 21, 2007 4:50 PM

Great review Dustin!! Keep the reviews bitchy and sarcastic! I come here for something that is different from the regular movie review but also gets the point across. Still, I am sorry you had to suffer through this. Why does Hollywood think they can keep making comedies by hashing up worn out sterotypes?? Oh yeah, those people who buy the tickets...damnit!

Posted by: Jackers at July 21, 2007 7:10 PM

As if any self-respecting gay man would be caught dead with the likes of James or Sandler. Please.

Posted by: samantha t at July 21, 2007 8:24 PM

I SO did not know the Two Cats Rule for Determining Sexual Preference! Oddly enough, my husband and I adopted our second cat shortly after marrying. Hmmmmmmm....

Also very dismayed to learn that Messrs. Payne and Taylor manufactured this drek.

Speaking of unfunny trailers(and an inevitably unfunny full-length movie), why are people laughing so G-D hard at the trailer for that stupid movie about a wannabe stunt man played by the douche from SNL whose only claim to fame are those two mostly funny songs from the show?

Oh and canology, I believe it was Ryan Reynolds abs that really made Blade:Trinity bearable. YUM.

Posted by: Alabamapink at July 21, 2007 9:10 PM

The worst thing about it, as Mara said, is that it's exactly the same as Strange Bedfellows, except it has Rob Schneider in it. So not only trash, copied trash too.

Posted by: Tina at July 21, 2007 9:43 PM

colin & patrick, i think you're missing the point somewhat. The site is for bitchy & scathing reviews. Yeah sure Dustin could have just said 'the film is shit do not see', but we all know that anyway, and besides it would make for a very brief film review site!
And anyway if more people point out the hypocrisy and general stupidity of films like this maybe just maybe studio's might take note, well they would in my imaginary world anyway....

Posted by: CJ at July 22, 2007 6:29 AM

alabamapink and canalogy: It was actually Ryan Reynolds rubbing his rock-hard abs and watching Parker Posey and Jessica Biel make out in their skin-tight goth outfits that made "Blade: Trinity" tolerable. Or maybe that part of the film was only playing in my head ...

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at July 22, 2007 12:50 PM

This is the most serious review that I have ever read. Ever.

Posted by: Blake Curry at July 22, 2007 5:17 PM

Anyone want to take bets on how long it is before some Coulter-type right wing pundit writes an article citing this movie as a plausible reason for not extending equal benefits to gay couples? You know its coming.

On a seperate note, I like Kevin James. He's a pretty good stand up, and I always felt that it was unfair how his show was lumped in with Yes, Dear and Two and a Half Coke Fiends. That said, he's joined Will Arnett as this year's inductees into the luminous hall of funny comedians who go on to make shitty (but lucrative) comedies.

Posted by: Matt B at July 22, 2007 5:31 PM

That this movie outsold Harry Potter over the weekend makes me want to cry. And I've never even read a Harry Potter book or seen any of the films. *sigh*

Posted by: clarity at July 22, 2007 6:16 PM

This review reads as if you wrote it after gorging on a year's worth of Mark Morford columns.

:(

Posted by: juliagulia at July 22, 2007 6:43 PM

Dustin - I'd be interested to see what you think of the Australian movie "Strange Bedfellows", now that people are finally discussing which movie is a rip-off of which. It is also about a straight firefigher widower 'marrying' his straight buddy to scam money from the goverment so he can look after his kids, and then having to endure a public test of their union.


I saw Strange Bedfellows fully expecting a cringe-fest, but ended up enjoying it. Now I (sort of) want to see Adam Sandler's version, so I can see exactly where they broke it.

Posted by: Trowzers at July 22, 2007 8:05 PM

Darn, is any movie good enough this weekend for me to visit the new Regal theater and pay out the nose?

Posted by: Radal16 at July 22, 2007 9:11 PM

Is the new theater in the mall formerly known as Pyramid?

I hate Adam Sandler so much. SO much. I can just feel the blood pressure rising thinking about the general plague he is and how my airline will invariably show all his films on our flights.

Ithaca is gorges!

Posted by: Trent880 at July 23, 2007 12:36 AM

Is there a master list of plot lines that pass the enlightened liberal central committee screening process, and if so could that list be given to Hollywood (a bastion of neoconservative sexist racism if there ever was one)? Thanks!

Posted by: BMOC at July 23, 2007 9:22 AM

Well, I am glad to hear that Ithaca has a modern movie-viewing venue. When I was there, pterodactyls had to peck away at the film while mastodons walked in big wheels to spin the reel.

Sorry, I'm feeling old today.

Anyhow- I'm STILL wondering why Larry couldn't just fake-marry a female for the benefits. Of course, to even come close to the comedic gold they have here, they'd have to make her an UGLY female, right? So the firehouse buddies could still be completely confused by his choice. After all, we all know that shlubby, stupid, insensitive guys always get the hottest wives, right? (Jim Belushi, take a bow).

Posted by: Go Big Red at July 23, 2007 9:33 AM

I hear this film made more money this weekend than harry potter. that's just sad.

Posted by: Emily at July 23, 2007 10:33 AM

for crying out loud...just laugh.

Posted by: dre at July 23, 2007 11:02 AM

"That this movie outsold Harry Potter over the weekend makes me want to cry."

Same here...totally disgusted.

Posted by: Kolby at July 23, 2007 11:18 AM

As much as I would never see this movie because of the annoying tics of the actors and the stereotypical and unbelievable "plot," I am equally glad that it was made. The target audience might actually learn something radical, i.e., gays are human beings. The target audience for this movie is not that for Brokeback Mountain. Accordingly, it must be approached in a different manner. From what I have seen from the comments posted on this site over the course of the last year (both those with which I agree and those with which I take issue) Pajibans are too intelligent and sophisticated to be taken in by this lame attempt to update (slightly) fag-bashing comedy. Nevertheless, I am glad that the movie is making money because that is what movies are intended to do and I suspect many in the audience will have their pre-conceived notions challenged (albeit only slightly) rather than confirmed by this inept buddy picture. Dustin did his job admirably: he warned us away from this offensive (on many levels) movie but I am heartened that those lower on the learning/empathy curve will be exposed to something different than they likely expected.

Posted by: rudy at July 23, 2007 11:49 AM

I always thought that the stereotypical lesbian equation was, female + dog + truck = lesbian. Maybe it's just that way in my neck of the woods.

Posted by: katy at July 23, 2007 11:54 AM

I always thought that the stereotypical lesbian equation was, female + dog + truck = lesbian. Maybe it's just that way in my neck of the woods.

Don't forget the potlucks!

Posted by: Fabiola Thing at July 23, 2007 12:17 PM

Fabulous review.

By the way, Barry Fanaro has Writer and Exec Producer of "The Secret Diary of Desmond Pfeiffer" credits, so you know this will be good

Posted by: Brian at July 23, 2007 12:49 PM

In the spirit of hilarity, apparently Eli Roth has written MSN a letter about their review of Captivity. Pretty amusing.

Anyone have a link for this?

Posted by: Brian at July 23, 2007 1:09 PM

Lighten up, Frances.

Posted by: The Duke of Deception at July 23, 2007 3:21 PM

Wait a minute...Brokeback Mountain was about homos?

Posted by: MRod at July 23, 2007 4:26 PM

I can't believe you paid Regal prices to see this. I didn't realize the new theater was opening this weekend, though- I'm assuming the sound has improved, so it's actually better than Willard Straight?

Posted by: Phaeolus at July 24, 2007 1:27 PM

That's why a movie like I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry is so refreshing in today's studio marketplace.
--

That was the line that turned the review from humor into art. I was very afraid that the opening paragraph of the review was supposed to mean that this movie was LIKE Brokeback Mountain, in which case the world would stop making sense.

Posted by: Amelia at July 24, 2007 3:22 PM

There is a gay kiss at the end... just not Chuckles and Fairy.

Posted by: k_sra at July 24, 2007 4:33 PM

Dustin Rowles, you're a douche bag. For some reason you're pissed off that Sandler didn't pitch to James during the movie. Heaven forbid a comedy centered around a false premise be made, cuz that's never been done before. And how dare they try to find humor in a fake gay marriage! Get over yourself, shithead. Jeez, I can't stand people like you.

Posted by: Tony at July 24, 2007 8:49 PM

I love it....I love it...Brie...THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU for pointing out that Adam Sandler is THE SAME GUY from SNL in ALL of his TV skits, movies, and interviews. From the guy on Remote Control to Opera Man to Happy Gilmore, ALL THE SAME GUY...the stupid voice, the same 10th grade jokes, the same cast, the same everything. He started this shit and they kept pumping out more jerkoffs from SNL with BAD movies. He may not be a bad guy, he certainly makes a shitload of money, and every now and then tries to make a real movie, but it comes back to this garbage EVERY time...and the other hangers-on ( Yeah Rob Schneider I am talking to you!) gleefully jump aboard to cash the check....you think they kick back 10% to Sandler for casting them in this shit time after time? Now we get to see Adam Samberg try his luck at really bad movies that should be 6 minute skits on SNL. Maybe these guys should put this much "effort" into the skits and the TV show wouldn't suck so bad. Anyway...enough venom from me....BTW...With all this anger...I can't be gay right? I mean, I HAVE to be straight.....................right?

Posted by: teebee at July 24, 2007 10:17 PM

Just for the record, Rob Schneider is 1/2 Filipino. So while it's annoying that Hollywood thinks all people of Asian descent are interchangeable (was anyone else annoyed that Memoirs of a Geisha had Chinese actresses portraying Japanese characters?), I suppose I should be happy for some evolution. It wasn't that long ago when John Wayne was donning yellowface to play Ghengis Khan in The Conqueror, so perhaps I should count my blessings. If I were Japanese, though, I would be pissed about portrayal of the whole "l"/"r" stereotype.

Posted by: LibraryChick at July 24, 2007 10:23 PM

In the spirit of hilarity, apparently Eli Roth has written MSN a letter about their review of Captivity. Pretty amusing.

Anyone have a link for this?


Brian, here ya go.

http://movies.msn.com/movies/torture_roth

I cannot believe I forgot to add the link. My apologies. Hope that you enjoy. Eli Roth also has his own myspace page. I meant to say review of Hostel Part 2, by the way. I was trying to type this very quickly before I left.

Posted by: Melody at July 25, 2007 1:37 PM

first time poster, long time reader..
let me just start by saying that this movie was absolutely terrible
e.g. chuck and larry are married, jewish barmitzvah (sp?) music begins playing, they start dancing, a random bum begins doing the russian kicks, then breakdancing
just a classic example of great film, well thought out after long nights with chinese food in the boardroom no doubt
re: first post by ben: calling dustin brilliant... just another little spoiler for you ben, this movie WAS indeed a bunch of cliched stereotypes, and NOT only homosexual ones
(and what is it with people kissing so much ass to the reviewers.. no offense, because you guys (and some girls) sometimes deserve a pat on the back)
in conclusion, this movie made me die a little inside. the end

Posted by: aleks at July 26, 2007 2:49 AM

I'm not disappointed in Adam Sandler. Guy's always been such a talent-less and shitty actor. And I won't even comment on Rob Schneider. Why bother??

No, it's Alexander Payne in whom I am disappointed. Dude, what the hell were you thinking having anything to do with this?

Hope that paycheck was worth it. And I guess we all know it was.

Posted by: Not Rob Schneider at July 27, 2007 11:11 AM

I gotta say as a review this was a piece of shit, totally useless. Colin

Colin - Writing these reviews is hard work. If you don't like a particular review, try being a little more diplomatic about it. Or...go set up your own web site, recruit some writers, and dazzle us with your brilliance.

And Tony, you're not getting that job at the UN. Please learn to play nicely in the sandbox or find another site. I'm sure Perez Hilton would be happy to have you.

That is all. We now return to our regularly scheduled bitchiness.

Posted by: OhSoCranky at July 28, 2007 5:19 PM

I was curious about the Eli Roth / MSN response, so I found it. It was in response to an article re: the death of torture porn, not a review of Captivity.

I haven't read it yet, so no spoilers. Yay! Enjoy.

//tv.msn.com/movies/torture_roth

Posted by: ReverendShannon at July 29, 2007 5:37 AM

some rhetorical sarcasm (don't you hate that -- it's so fucking obnoxious)

Aahahahdsgfdsfjh, I c wut u did thur.

Posted by: sia at July 29, 2007 10:36 AM

I'm desperate. I live in Korea and only the shittiest summer-blockbuster crap gets through to the movies in my small city. It was horrible. Horrible. You have to wonder if producers/directors/actors are proud of themselves after infecting society with a piece of filth such as this. Do they slap each other on the back and say "Good job, we really pulled out an intelligent, worthwhile use of 100 million bucks there?" Do they? I hate Hollywood. I hate it. The Koreans in the theatre loved this movie, except they didn't laugh at Schneider. Ugh. Why did I see this? Because there's ONE choice of English-language movie and every time I manage to convince myself it might be okay, just to be able to sit down and eat some popcorn in a theatre. I did that with Poseidon. Music and Lyrics. Die Hard. And now with Chuck and Larry. GOD.

Posted by: naomi at September 7, 2007 11:45 PM

I'm desperate. I live in Korea and only the shittiest summer-blockbuster crap gets through to the movies in my small city. It was horrible. Horrible. You have to wonder if producers/directors/actors are proud of themselves after infecting society with a piece of filth such as this. Do they slap each other on the back and say "Good job, we really pulled out an intelligent, worthwhile use of 100 million bucks there?" Do they? I hate Hollywood. I hate it. The Koreans in the theatre loved this movie, except they didn't laugh at Schneider. Ugh. Why did I see this? Because there's ONE choice of English-language movie and every time I manage to convince myself it might be okay, just to be able to sit down and eat some popcorn in a theatre. I did that with Poseidon. Music and Lyrics. Die Hard. And now with Chuck and Larry. GOD.

Posted by: naomi at September 7, 2007 11:46 PM

If you dont like it, dont watch it. It is that simple. You shouldnt go online just to complaine about what you dont like. Change the channel, go to a different movie, walk the other way. Those people have feelings to you know. Stop acting like you are better then they are, cause you are not.

Posted by: Shut up! at December 2, 2007 2:24 PM



searchthesite.jpg