web
counter
 

I Am Number 4: Finally, James Frey's Real Autobiography

By Steven Lloyd Wilson | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (32)



i-am-number-four.jpg

Well this is just disappointing. I spent the entire morning before going to the movie thinking of all the permutations of “I am number 2” that I could use in the headline to this review, and then the damned thing wasn’t half bad. I cultivate low expectations in order not to be disappointed and instead I get this, the no win scenario in which I’m disappointed by not being disappointed enough, but don’t enjoy the film enough to make up for it.

The novel version of I Am Number 4 was the next logical step for James Frey’s writing career. An artist’s natural progression throughout history has been to start with passing fiction off as biography and then to move on to adolescent half baked science fiction with a coauthor under a shared pen name. The book managed to sell the movie rights a year before it was published, so that filming actually began 3 months before any of the public had actually read the book. That’s why they’ve managed to put out a film version only six months after the book hit stores. The novel spent six weeks on the children’s subdivision of the New York Times best seller list. I have no idea if the novel is actually any good, but congratulations anyway universe. I didn’t think it was possible for me to be more cynical about the film and fiction industries, but there are always stories like this to prove me wrong.

The film is dreadfully competent, wrapping decent enough film making around a plot that has been lifted piecemeal from a dozen other science fiction stories. But it’s put together just well enough, that it’s actually entertaining. It’s infinitely derivative and has not the slightest spark of originality to it, which makes it quite infuriating to review. I have a strong urge to choke the life out of a film that takes scene after scene from other films, yet with every cliché it rolls out, it sidesteps the pitfalls just enough to avoid making the audience roll its eyes.

The film version of I Am Number 4 follows the same basic story as the book, although one assumes that the differences may be because the screenwriter was working off an early outline of the novel, as opposed to necessarily being deliberate departures from the story. There are a group of nine alien teenagers in hiding on Earth (Roswell). They’re the last survivors of their world and have superhuman powers (Superman). The invaders who destroyed their world have come to Earth and are hunting them (innumerable other science fiction stories). For no explained reason, the alien kids can only be killed in a particular order, which is why with the first three dead it is so titularly relevant that “John Smith” is number four.

The lifting from other stories isn’t just on the level of the broad strokes. John insists on going to high school in order to be normal (because of course he does), except that it actually manages to hit an emotional chord with the simple fact that he wants to because he’s lonely. He falls in love with a local girl who is both implausibly hot and an outcast like him (because of course he does), yet the film actually takes the time to show them genuinely connecting and sharing real moments instead of just expecting us to take brooding and lip chewing as love. He fights with his Olyphant over leaving yet another town behind (because of course he does), but it’s redeemed by the fact that the actors manage to pull off genuine father(figure)/son affection and John resigns himself to the necessity without being an enormous CW twat about it. Faster than you can say Ralph Macchio, John gets jumped by the local football assholes (because of course he does), but it feels right because the film is just skillful enough at douche painting to lend some catharsis to John hospitalizing them, and just nuanced enough to make him feel guilty instead of cocky. The entire film proceeds this way, with a fill-in-the-blanks structure just barely saved at every turn by a competent attention to detail.

The biggest problem with the film is that more than anything it feels like an extra long television pilot more than the tent pole of a new franchise. While it does a decent enough job with leaving enough mysteries to set up for another film, it feels like a story that would have been far better served developing over the course of many episodes. And there’s a fairly obvious explanation for that once you start looking at the credits. The screenplay is by Alfred Gough, Miles Millar, and Marti Noxon, which explains a lot about why so much of the film gave off an unhealthy deja vu of Smallville and Buffy. It also makes some sense out of the film’s odd grafting of genuine emotion onto derivative cliché. They were handed a generic skeleton without much flexibility for change, and layered on as much genuine flesh as they could. And DJ Caruso is just competent enough of a director to not strip out of the script what worked.

Worth seeing in theaters? Not if you’ve got something better to do, but it sure beats Martin Lawrence in a fat suit.


Steven Lloyd Wilson is a hopeless romantic and the last scion of Norse warriors and the forbidden elder gods. His novel, ramblings, and assorted fictions coalesce at www.burningviolin.com. You can email him here.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



BIG MOMMAS: LIKE FATHER LIKE SON Review: 25 Million People Are Unemployed in the United States and Martin Lawrence Isn't One of Them | Electric Literature No. 1 Stories from Michael Cunningham, Jim Shepard, T Cooper, Lydia Millet, Diana Wagman









Comments

Gods dammit, why does Olyphant continually get these terrible movie roles? I need my fix, and Justified being back on just isn't enough anymore. Somebody cast this man as the lead in something good. PLEASE. Don't make me keep rewatching the scene in Deadwood where he's building the store and he's shirtless...

and...

moustache...

I'm sorry, what was I saying? I went to my mental boudoir for a second there.

Posted by: littlelion at February 18, 2011 8:06 PM

Is Teresa Palmer any good in it? Does Agron show her boobies? This is important information that should not be left out.

Posted by: Illuminatus at February 18, 2011 8:07 PM

Also, it looks like Olyphant is checking out what's-his-name's ass in that picture. Which I'm sure is why it was chosen.

Hee.

Posted by: littlelion at February 18, 2011 8:07 PM

New York Magazine did a piece on Frey's production company Full Fathom Five, which is essentially a writers' sweatshop. The contract is pretty brutal, and from what I understand, that's where this movie came from. I don't care if it's good or not; Frey's an asshole, and I won't be seeing it.

Posted by: Nora Borealis at February 18, 2011 8:11 PM

The entire film proceeds this way, with a fill-in-the-blanks structure just barely saved at every turn by a competent attention to detail.

Something about the defeated tone of this sentence made me laugh out loud.

My co-workers are now watching me type this.

Shannon smells like butthole HAHAHAHA!

Posted by: superasente at February 18, 2011 8:22 PM

He fights with his Olyphant

This line made me feel good for some reason. I wish I had an Olyphant.

Posted by: elgarcon at February 18, 2011 8:27 PM

it sure beats Martin Lawrence in a fat suit.

The new tagline for every mediocre movie we'll watch anyway.

Posted by: Brenton at February 18, 2011 9:00 PM

An artist’s natural progression throughout history has been to start with passing fiction off as biography

Actually, I've known several writers who started out with passing off their life story as their first "novel"....

But that's neither here nor there. What's important is: where's *my* Olyphant? I would never fight with my Olyphant. I would love him and squeeze him and - well, you know the rest.

Posted by: MM at February 18, 2011 9:18 PM

I cultivate low expectations in order not to be disappointed and instead I get this, the no win scenario in which I’m disappointed by not being disappointed enough, but don’t enjoy the film enough to make up for it.

Do not, please I beg of you, start compromising your standards because the other major release is Martin Lawrence in a fat suit. This is Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People, for god's sake. If this morphs into lazy reviews for easily satisfied people I'm outta here.

Posted by: sittingpat at February 18, 2011 9:29 PM

sittingpat: Oh, I wouldn't worry. Expectations and standards are orthogonal. Otherwise cynics would be the happiest people on Earth.

Posted by: Steven Lloyd Wilson at February 18, 2011 9:41 PM

I have $10 at an AMC concession stand that expires on Feb. 28th. I don't want to lose it, but there has been nothing I've wanted to see. (sans Green Hornet, but it was only playing in 3D at my local AMC, and eff that)

I guess I'll be catching this at the early $6 show.

Posted by: calliope1975 at February 18, 2011 9:49 PM

I thought everyone understood, after the disaster that was Highlander 2, that everyone understood to never again bring outer space warriors to fight their duels on Earth.

Posted by: Fredo at February 18, 2011 10:26 PM

Obviously Fredo you have never seen Highlander: The Source. The most painful Scifi experience ever. My brain burns with the memories and I wallow in abject shame admitting to watching this pukeworthy turdtastic embarrassment to celluloid. Highlander 2 was amazing and epic in comparison.

I am just here for the Olyphant so I might go see this because of him.

Posted by: mc-rox at February 18, 2011 11:15 PM

If I had an Olyphant, I wouldn't let that laser sight target him under the arm.

What? I was staring, and there it was.

Posted by: Reba at February 18, 2011 11:35 PM

I would see this if they were giving away personal Olyphants.

Posted by: duckandcover at February 19, 2011 12:20 AM

If I had an Olyphant, I wouldn't let that laser sight target him under the arm.

I noticed that too. Now I can't stop staring at it.

If I had an Olyphant, he would be in focus, dammit.

Posted by: Jerce at February 19, 2011 12:47 AM

"I am not a number, I am a free man!"

...But it's a bit too much to ask that Frey has knowledge of British cult classics isn't it?

Posted by: SpacemanSpiff at February 19, 2011 1:03 AM

If it's any help, in the book (yes I read it, shut up) the nine children were being shuttled off the planet as it was being destroyed (Superman, anyone?) and one of the sorcerers (wizards? magic men? something like that) knew they would be pursued by the enemy and cast a spell so that they could only be killed if found in order. Why not just cast a spell that makes it so they can't be killed? Your guess is as good as mine.

Posted by: Even Stevens at February 19, 2011 1:58 AM

I find it disturbing that the io9 review of this film was so much harsher than the Pajiba one; the former site usually gives a lot more leeway to genre movies.

Posted by: csb at February 19, 2011 9:33 AM

A friend and I are going to the movies this weekend (Canadian Family Day! Day off in February! Woot!) and she's seen EVERYTHING except this and Martin Lawrence/Fat Suit. I know based on this review that I can at least sit through it, plot-wise and with the eye candy factor I'll probably even enjoy it. That blond fellow has lovely cheekbones. I'm a sucker for cheekbones.

Posted by: malechai at February 19, 2011 12:24 PM

The sole reason I will be seeing this film is because of Alex Pettyfer and my unhealthy lust for him.
A dash of Olyphant doesn't hurt either.

Posted by: squeeziee at February 19, 2011 2:46 PM

Why does everyone seem to care about this movie?

Is it weird that he is an alien and is white and blonde?

Posted by: guy rossi at February 19, 2011 4:02 PM

All the sites I expected to tear this film to shreds are saying it's "ok, not great" and all the sites I expected to give lip service to the film hate it. My world has been turned upside down to the point that I might catch the $6 showing tomorrow to find out who is collaborating with who just to fuck with my expectations.

I'm betting on this being mediocre and middling in every sense but worthy of more derision than this review gives it. I mean, Glee's Quinn, who has all the charisma of a cheerleader's megaphone, is the romantic lead. What gives?

Posted by: Robert at February 19, 2011 5:37 PM

I actually think there's something about Diana agron that so charismatic and I don't even find her that attractive. She's definitely one of the better actors on Glee - the girl can put out so much emotion with just a single look.

Oh yea, and I will NOT be catching this...

Posted by: Denesteak at February 19, 2011 6:28 PM

I already watched this when it was called Jumper and hated it.

SLW: "Expectations and standards are orthogonal."

From now on, that shall be known as the Cynic's Law of Diminishing Returns.

Posted by: Big Softie at February 19, 2011 8:25 PM

That's not Glee's Quinn. At least, not the picture up top.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at February 19, 2011 10:00 PM

He fights with his Olyphant over leaving yet another town behind

You know, it doesn't help that every time I read this guy's name I see it as "Oliphant", like what Sam calls the Mumakil in LOTR. Now I imagine this kid fighting a giant elephant with tusks that he keeps as a pet and then...I...um...

Damn...I am a giant nerd.

Posted by: Figgy at February 19, 2011 11:46 PM

MY personal Oliphant will be perpetually shirtless, in focus and at the forefront of every picture. You will see me nestled cosily under his biceps gazing adoringly yet whimsically into his eyes; lounging vertically while he kneels (again whimsically and adoringly) by my side giving me foot- and other rubs; or alternatively, you will see neither of us except in brief flashes of - nay, not whimsical nor adoring but passionate and soulful flesh beneath red silk sheets.
I see your metal boudoir, madame de littlelion, and raise you a mental brothel...

Posted by: cinekat at February 21, 2011 7:32 AM

Somebody cast this man as the lead in something good.

Please tell me you are referring to his movie career because Justified is incredible. However, I do agree that it's not enough (because how can Olyphant on your TV one night a week ever be enough?)

Posted by: Mel C. at February 21, 2011 9:46 AM

The hubby and I saw this Saturday..mainly because it looked 'OK' and we were bored after spending all day at a baseball game and the cheap small theater down the road was play 4 movies and this was one of them. (And I went for Olyphant, hubby went for Quinn if we are being totally honest).

I went into it thinking it was going to be Twlight for Boys and it was...only it was sorta GOOD. I fully defend the review here about it because I too went into it hoping for it to just 'not suck' and my expections were exceeded.

Yes, full of cliches but there were some heartfelt moments and the action was pretty good too. Good soundtrack...made me feel hip because I already had several of the songs on my ipod. Overall enjoyable and we left feeling like we hadn't wasted our money, which is a rare feeling these days at the movies!

Posted by: beautifulgirl at February 21, 2011 5:47 PM

Screw you all. If I had an Olyphant, none of you bitches would ever see him again because he wouldn't be allowed out of the bedroom. The only exception being when I put him out into the hallway to walk. And watch him walk. Back and forth.

Posted by: sarahk at February 22, 2011 11:22 AM

You, boys and girls, are fucking HILarious!

You made my morning.

Much thanks.

Posted by: Valerie Klyman-Clark at February 24, 2011 7:00 AM