free counter with statistics Hitcher, The | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

sophia_bush.jpg

Tediously Matter of Fact

The Hitcher / Dustin Rowles

Film Reviews | January 19, 2007 | Comments (65)


Dave Meyer’s remake of 1986’s The Hitcher sets its tone immediately, once white letters on a black screen reveal that “42,000 people die each year on the highways in the United States.” The matter-of-fact tone permeates the entire film to such a degree that, upon leaving the theater, it’s impossible not to think in the same, nonchalant manner.

To wit:

The Hitcher starts on a dark and rainy night, the kind of sideways rain designed specifically to soak Grace Andrews’ (Sophia Bush) t-shirt while under attack. Grace and Jim (veteran television extra Zachary Knighton) are driving a 1970 Oldsmobile 442, heading toward a spring break vacation. At their intended destination, beer will be drunk, clothes will be removed, and roofies will run aplenty.

The ominous music of The All-American Rejects plays on the radio.

Grace is half-asleep; one leg is propped on the dashboard, threatening to expose her upskirt. She is content, having recently relieved her bladder of its contents. Jim’s eyes are on the road; he plucks, occasionally, from his Lillardesque tuft of chin-hair. It’s summer. Jim is wearing a t-shirt, though it is clear that he is more accustomed to the comforts of a popped-collar.

Jim and Grace are in love. The entire world is ahead of them.

Actually, a menacing man (Sean Bean) in a trench coat is standing ahead of them. Jim narrowly avoids the imposing figure standing next to a stalled vehicle, spinning the Oldsmobile 360 degrees and arriving, safely, in the middle of the road. He considers picking up the Hitcher, but — on Kate’s advice — drives on, resuscitating the flooded engine seconds before the Hitcher approaches them.

Minutes and miles later, Jim and Grace encounter the Hitcher again at a gas station. His name is John Ryder. His car is broken down. The nearest motel is 15 miles away. The convenience store clerk, a bumpkin who notes his own failure to milk donkeys, volunteers Jim’s services. Jim is taken aback. But Jim, clearly unfamiliar with Sean Bean’s filmography, reluctantly agrees.

In the car, few words are exchanged on the short drive, until Mr. Ryder asks Jim, “So, how long have you been fucking her?” directing his eyes toward the backseat, where Grace is listening to her iPod. Jim tells John that it’s none of his business. John seems irritated by Jim’s remark. So irritated, in fact, that John decides to end the lives of Grace and Jim with a knife. John fails; he is thrown from the car for his efforts.

John remains upset that Jim didn’t answer his question. A simple question, really: “How long have you been fucking her?” John thinks to himself, “This kind of snub will not stand. No sir. If an elder asks a question to a generic college kid, said kid best answer. Or else.”

Or else, John will kill an entire family traveling cross-country, take out 20 police officers, a helicopter, several automobiles, frame Grace and Jim for the murders, and otherwise wreak general, non-specific havoc on the road ways.

(Spoiler Alert)

Jim should have answered the question. If he had, Jim wouldn’t have had his body split in half, violently separated at the waist by two 18-wheelers driving in opposite directions.

It really was a simple question.

(Spoiler Ends)

Moviegoers attending the The Hitcher will jump from their seat exactly three times, twice because sudden loud noises will wake them from a light slumber. They will recoil once, from gore. The film will elicit 4.6 laughs, each the result of the film’s sheer absurdity. Seventy-three percent of moviegoers will shake their heads interminably, wondering quietly to themselves how they ended up seated in this particular theater watching this particular movie. Forty-three percent of female dates will turn to their boyfriends/husbands at some point and ask, “Why are we here?” Sixty-eight percent of the men will respond, “Just watch the film, OK?” Approximately 62 percent of college-aged men will feel guilty for dragging groups of friends to see The Hitcher at the Friday midnight screening. The other 38 percent will remark smugly, “Dude. That chick was hot. I’d tap that.” The same 38 percent will sleep alone that night reeking of burnt caterpillar, the signature scent of IHOP.

The only moments of joy will come from a Nine Inch Nails song, which will transport 78 percent of attendees 28 and older to an earlier time when they remembered thinking Trent Reznor was “the shit.” They will suddenly remember why: They were consistently high during a three-year period in college.

When the credits finally roll, most moviegoers will think little of it. They will sigh and walk out unenthusiastically. However, hours later, they will wonder why they continue to speak in short, curt sentences. And they will remember, finally, that “42,000 people die each year on highways in the United States.” And it will all make sense. However, the film — as well as the motivation of the Hitcher — will still remain a mystery.

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. He lives with his wife in Ithaca, New York. You may email him, or leave a comment below.


Venus | Pajiba Love 01/22/07



Comments

The original Hitcher scarred me for life, what with Jennifer Jason Leigh getting drawn-and-quarted by 18 wheelers.

Sounds like the dude gets it this time, and no doubt they probably show buckets of blood and guts. The original left it to your imagination, a far more effective way to convey horror.

What I want to know is how Sean Bean sizes up to Rutger Hauer.

Posted by: Tritisan at January 19, 2007 6:52 PM

"The same 38 percent will sleep alone that night reeking of burnt caterpillar, the signature scent of IHOP."

Amazing.

Posted by: Bucko at January 19, 2007 7:12 PM

Is anyone else as annoyed as I am by the commercials for this garbage? "Strangers think I'm trustworthy, but I'm really not! HAR HAR I GOT A KNIFE"

Posted by: Trebba at January 19, 2007 7:15 PM

Is it weird that because this review was so hilarious, I rather want to see it, then promptly leave twenty minutes in to sneak into a better movie? I think I will. Thanks, Pajiba!

Posted by: Rachel at January 19, 2007 7:41 PM

First of all, this did not need to be remade. Second the original 80's version had Rutger Hauer, sorry, but Sean Bean just can't pull off psycho/unhinged the way RH could.
Third, C. Thomas and Jennifer Lee were ACTORS not MTV/A&F/WB cardboard models.
Fourth, in the original they dealt with the C. Thomas character actually losing his innocence and becoming a man.
Finally, the relationship between Rutger and C. Thomas had complexity (and maybe a little gay).

Anyway, this pile of shit has none of that and it's more generic product from, and for, Generation Douchebag, I weep for the future.

you suck Hollywood

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 19, 2007 7:54 PM

I love this review ... but I'm really stoned so Im not sure :P

I'll re-post tomorrow!

Posted by: Sandy at January 19, 2007 8:11 PM

Dude. That chick was hot. I'd tap that.

Posted by: apocalipstick at January 19, 2007 8:14 PM

Generation Douchebag...now that is beautiful.

Posted by: Smokin at January 19, 2007 8:21 PM

And 92% of movie critics who secretly read Pajiba will say, "I wish I'd thought to use clever statistics in my review."

Well done.

Posted by: superedna at January 19, 2007 8:35 PM

Are we really pining for the days of the open-mouthed thesping of C. Thomas Howell (if C. didn't stand for "Corey", it should have) now? I was 19 and stoned when I saw the original, so of course it was hilarious, but let's not call an out-of-nowhere "twist" ending complex.

Posted by: sansho1 at January 19, 2007 8:36 PM

This needs to be added to the list. I was hoping Sophia would pull it off and give Elisha a run for her money comparing to that other wonderful horror remake 'House Of Wax'. I mean they had Sopia in her low waist draws for goodness sake. If that couldn't pull it ahead of Wax then nothing could. Too bad.

Posted by: Candy at January 19, 2007 8:50 PM

C. Thomas Howell: he of Red Dawn (dated, but good) Soul Man (timeless), and of course, the Hitcher. was anybody else really, really, really, ridiculously upset to see him make a cameo during 24 last season? talk about not aging well. Kiefer must've owed him a huuuuuuuuuuuge favor.....

Posted by: Keith at January 19, 2007 9:05 PM

Just in case I referred to the complexity of the relationship of the character's not C . Thomas' acting. Even though I've gotta say that this particular movie might have been his best work.

And let me just say how played-out this shitting on everything that's a week old has become. Oh, it's from the eighties so it MUST suck, oh it's the nineties wow it REALLY sucks, oh that's from 2000 it's teh suck!!

Really people it's lame.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 19, 2007 9:25 PM

"was anybody else really, really, really, ridiculously upset to see him make a cameo during 24 last season? talk about not aging well."

Oh my god, was that him? Reminds me of the last movie I saw Raul Julia in (some crap with Van Damme) and I wasn't sure that was him either. How sad.

Posted by: Mary at January 19, 2007 9:35 PM

All I can say, BarbadoSlim, is welcome to the comments section for the remake of The Hitcher.

Posted by: sansho1 at January 19, 2007 10:31 PM

Best. Review. Evar.

I especially loved the Spoiler Alert.

For some weird reason, I could picture John Cleese reading the review to me. It was scrumtrulescent.

Posted by: Vermillion at January 19, 2007 10:32 PM

Now this is how you review a craptacular horror film. One so bad it doesn't even draw merit to rent (not see in theaters) to simply laugh at its awfulness. Great interpretation of the cause of the chaos - if I'm forced to see this (which I would rather be spoiler alerted than do), I will make sure I expound upon the "brilliance" of this moment and how the thought of sex without any response turns the average pervert into a pscyho.

Posted by: Robert at January 19, 2007 11:27 PM

"Moviegoers attending the The Hitcher will jump from their seat exactly three times, twice because sudden loud noises will wake them from a light slumber."

Bwahhhahaha!!

The greatest thing about the movie, by the looks of it, is this review. And actually, that's probably saying a lot, because I thoroughly enjoyed reading it.

Posted by: zadzi at January 19, 2007 11:43 PM

brilliant review. Love it!!!!

Posted by: susan at January 20, 2007 12:45 AM

I really enjoyed the review and the comments! :D

I too am bummed and perplexed that they remade this movie. So many reasons.

It was fantastic the first time, and why oh why can't Hollywood put a pen to paper and write something new?
And I agree that Jennifer Jason Leigh, the Rutger, and *coff* C.Thomas, were the greatness.

And I can't really accept Boromir as the Hitcher. Because I want to bang Boromir, and you're not supposed to find The Hitcher attractive.

Megadittos on the open mouthed C.Thomas *emoting*! However I do have fond memories of "Secret Admirer", in which he has to make the not hard at all choice between the sweet, smart Lori Loughlin and the (comparatively) aging slapper Kelly Preston.
Extra points for added Corey Haim!

I dunno, I might see this new Hitcher movie, if my arm is twisted. But I'm not paying for it! :)

Posted by: Loob at January 20, 2007 1:10 AM

"Moviegoers attending the The Hitcher will jump from their seat exactly three times, twice because sudden loud noises will wake them from a light slumber."

Funny. That's when I jumped during 'The Blair Witch Project'.

Posted by: Mara at January 20, 2007 1:37 AM

@Sansho1

Oh gee, thanks! I'd say you were being condescending but you are way too classy for that.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 20, 2007 5:32 AM

""was anybody else really, really, really, ridiculously upset to see him make a cameo during 24 last season? talk about not aging well."

Oh my god, was that him? Reminds me of the last movie I saw Raul Julia in (some crap with Van Damme) and I wasn't sure that was him either. How sad."

That was Street Fighter the Movie with Julia and Van Damme.

Wasn't that comfortable either with seeing C. Thomas Howell junkified for those 2 episodes in 24. I barely noticed the casualties in the CTU headquarters, so distressing.

On Topic: Sean Bean is an excellent villain (Patriot Games, Fellowship, even GoldenEye) but to shove him into comparison with the almighty Rutger Hauer is frankly unfair. Bloody remakes: 95% are shite. In't there a new Revenge of the Nerds coming up? And what about Sledge Hammer the movie? I'd go stand in line for that.

Posted by: Jeff K at January 20, 2007 7:43 AM

Is it Grace or Kate? Or was Kate a different character altogether and I'm just confused? Or (and this is probably most likely) does it just not matter what their names are?

Posted by: Melly at January 20, 2007 1:51 PM

OK OK I was having some fun at your expense. I'll grant you RH and JJL in the original (how could I not). But I've been ridiculing C Thomas Howell for many years now -- what can I say, it gives me pleasure. I can just see him jumping up and down behind the more talented Brat Packers saying, "Hey guys, guys! Can I be in the next one, pleeeassee?!"

Posted by: sansho1 at January 20, 2007 3:01 PM

I'm sorry to highjack this discussion again, but C. Thomas Howell only turned 40 in Dec. Eek!

Posted by: Mary S. at January 20, 2007 5:05 PM

Jeff K., last I heard, the Nerds remake was canceled.

Posted by: Vermillion at January 20, 2007 7:05 PM

For some weird reason, I could picture John Cleese reading the review to me.
I had to read the whole thing again, imagining John Cleese reading the text announcer-style. Spot on!

Posted by: Sunsneezer at January 20, 2007 8:00 PM

It makes me sad that I adore Sean Bean but may never see any of his movies again. Sad sad sad. I have to admit here, I saw Troy and he was awesome in it. Even though it was awful. I just like to always think of him as Boromir pre-ring.

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at January 20, 2007 10:32 PM

Dustin and Barbadoslim are right on.

This movie is complete and utter proof that Phillip Stephens' "remakes" section of the Sh(it) List was right on.

Sean Bean needs a new agent...he deserves better than this and 99% of the other shit he's in. If he's not careful, he's going to become the new Cage or Travolta.

The original was a masterpiece of tension, excess, and gratuitous Hauer/Howell craziness.

Oh, and Eric Red is a fucking psychopath (even if he did give us "The Hitcher", "Body Parts", and "Near Dark"--which, by way of Satan, is also being remade). Check out this craziness:

http://www.laweekly.com/general/features/death-race-2000/12382/

Posted by: idiot dentist at January 21, 2007 12:30 AM

RE: Vermillions use of the word 'scrumtrulescent'... I F-ing LOVE YOU GUYS.

And this review, in the words of my neice, totally, like, rocked my socks.

Posted by: Eva at January 21, 2007 4:10 AM

Kudos BarbadoSlim!!!!! Your first post said it all!!!

Where's the fucking originality in Hollywood anymore? ANOTHER REMAKE??? WTF????

It's sad, man.

Posted by: boarwild at January 21, 2007 4:15 AM

at Vermillions: thx 4 the hedzup.

Posted by: Jeff K at January 21, 2007 5:31 AM

Why drag Reznor into this review? It's just all together wrong.

Posted by: jp at January 21, 2007 1:19 PM

How are they going to a spring break destination if, as you say, "it is summer"??

Posted by: Christine at January 21, 2007 2:26 PM

That was a great review, once again Pajiba explains it all.

Posted by: adrianne at January 21, 2007 5:26 PM

Is that a reference to the Actor's Studio skit on SNL?

Posted by: M at January 21, 2007 6:41 PM

I suppose he was in character for this role when I encountered him. I probably wouldn't have gone to see it anyway.

Posted by: Spherical Time at January 21, 2007 10:02 PM

"The same 38 percent will sleep alone that night reeking of burnt caterpillar, the signature scent of IHOP."

Amazing.

Posted by: Bucko at January 19, 2007 07:12 PM

same here, bud. too much. I almost weed there.


Why did they remake the minor classic original? Bean's always been Mr Irish Kool, I do not want to see him as a sociopathic villain. The original's french-fry scene with C T Howell still gives me the ickies, as does Leigh used as a tow rope. They just bastardized this one so the chick could run around in a wet t-shirt, spank material for HS boys.

Posted by: matt at January 21, 2007 11:34 PM

I seriously thought that this had the possibility of a good horror movie. Not a psychological thriller, but at the very least not that PG-13 stuff. I was put off by the usual hot teenager set, but I was considering it because I like Sean Bean, and I'd see pretty much anything with someone from LotR in it.

But you guys saved me. Great review.

Posted by: Camille at January 22, 2007 1:13 AM

i knew this movie was shit from just one look-see at the preview.....no surprise here.

Posted by: Bea Gass at January 22, 2007 11:41 AM

trent reznor was, in fact, the shit, and one didn't need to be high to think so.

but that was then, and this is now, and aside from his continuing ability to pull off blistering live performances, he's sort of not the shit anymore. it sucks.

Posted by: jg at January 22, 2007 1:24 PM

Yay on all the Rutger Hauer love! He just appeals on so many levels, the smoldering eyes, the gravelly voice, the dangerous smirk, the name that is more fun to say than "Cecile Frot-Coutaz." I have secretly harbored this crush since 1985 when, at 14, I sat in a darkened theater (3 times) just wishing I could be a hawk by day to his wolf by night. Oh Rutger.

Posted by: Go Big Red at January 22, 2007 2:22 PM

Ahhh...Ladyhawke. Saw it again a few months ago for the first time in years. The Alan Parsons soundtrack didn't hold up too well (imo), but I still love that movie.

Posted by: pinkcheese at January 22, 2007 3:32 PM

Somebody, somewhere, find Sean Bean a new agent. Please, please, please. I want to see him in movies--just not in movies that suck.

Posted by: Jenna at January 22, 2007 5:46 PM

Go Big Red & pinkcheese, I share your love for "Ladyhawke." I will pop my tape (yes, VHS!) into my VCR and watch it a hundred-times over before I see this tripe on a 30-foot screen.

Even my husband, who likes "terror porn" a la "Saw" winces every time the trailer comes on TV.

Posted by: Ariel at January 22, 2007 7:32 PM

Gotta chime in on the lurve for Rutger Hauer, and also for 'Ladyhawke' which is just DEAD ROMANTIC...*sigh* (although the soundrack is howlingly bad).

Hauer fans, if you've never seen it, you gotta put 'Flesh & Blood' in your queue/on your list now:

http://imdb.com/title/tt0089153/

So over-the-top you will not believe your eyes. Jennifer Jason Leigh is incredibly young and, I must admit, looks good naked.

While you're at it, might as well pick up the original 'Hitcher' and make it a double bill.

Posted by: Jerce at January 22, 2007 7:48 PM

jg-
yes, Reznor still is the shit. Period. And if there are people who think he isn't, maybe they will enjoy this shit movie.

Posted by: jp at January 22, 2007 8:12 PM

Haurites, don't forget Split Second, that campy 80's dystopia SF flick which, sadly, appears to be currently out of print on DVD.

I never really listened to NIN but Reznor sure banged off a great video-game soundtrack with Alice. That said, we still used Reznor to mock this one extra-slimy toxic lookalike co-worker I once had, back in the day...

Posted by: ranylt at January 22, 2007 10:26 PM

ranylt, you mean "American McGee's Alice"? If so, Reznor didn't do the soundtrack, it was Chris Vrenna, who used to be in the NIN "band" apparently. And I agree, the music in that game was great.

Posted by: Jesse M. at January 22, 2007 10:43 PM

Dustin ur review rocks.
The statistics totally LMAO.
WHOA u lot should go into print.

I'll give The Hitcher a miss Ta a lot.

Remakes are the new black.
lol.

Posted by: Jean at January 23, 2007 8:57 AM

There you go, Jesse--I just proved my limited knowledge of the NIN-ites. I have heard Reznor does video game soundtracks these days--is that, at least, correct?

(Yes, that Alice--one of the all-time greats).

Posted by: ranylt at January 23, 2007 9:14 AM

didn't Reznor do Doom? or was it Halo?

Posted by: jp at January 23, 2007 12:16 PM

Am I the only one who had trouble breathing after "Lillardesque tuft of chin-hair"?

Hell, I volunteer to be SB's agent... I couldn't do any worse than his current one!

Posted by: mezzomom at January 23, 2007 12:36 PM

Reznor did all music for the Doom and Quake series good times. Good fucking times. I think I'm gonna re-install Quake2 now.

quake3world Rants&Raves was an awesome forum.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 23, 2007 2:50 PM

Bingo--it's the Halo set I'm thinking of for Reznor. Tx.

Posted by: ranylt at January 23, 2007 4:33 PM

Barbadoslim:

Quake2 Soundtrack was provided by Rob Zombie. My version at least.

Posted by: Jeff K at January 24, 2007 11:09 AM

Oof, you are correct sir, my bad.

I do know however that his( Reznor's) collaborations with ID games comes from them being close friends.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 24, 2007 4:05 PM

I would have found the film slightly more enjoyable as a concept if, instead, Sean Bean was a sort-of good guy, like a government agent or something, and the two young in-lovesters were like a new Bonnie and Clyde, so adept at avoiding police and such normally that he was send in by the FBI to kill them.

That would knock me flat on my ass with the sheer twistiness of it, given the same commercials.

But nooooooooo. It has to be exactly what it appeared to be.

Fuckers.

Posted by: Shadowen at January 25, 2007 3:31 AM

Guys, you are forgetting Hauer in Blade Runner when he made the best dying speech ever.

Posted by: Lizzie at January 26, 2007 6:49 AM

I was forced by my boyfriend to see the damn movie. I seriously want my money back. After like five minutes of watching it you space out because you lose all interest. I figured "hmm..maybe the people who die will die in a sick,violent matter in which I can laugh at"
..no luck
And honestly...why is the girl from "One Tree Hill" portraying the "hopelessly in love" scared shitless but has to "be a man" victim/hero?
Oh wait...guys think she's hot. Question answered.

Posted by: starr at January 28, 2007 1:24 PM

That was one of the most hilarious reviews I've ever read. Any statistics professor would give you an A+ for the math. And it's quotable math, to boot!

"But Jim, clearly unfamiliar with Sean Bean's filmography, reluctantly agrees."

...AHAHAHAHAHA. Wonderful!

I had no plans to see that movie, but a couple of my friends do, so I believe I'll direct them to this review. Poor Sean Bean. I quite like him, despite his habit of playing villains all the time when he's perfectly capable of doing more. What possessed him to take this role?

Posted by: Kate K. at January 29, 2007 12:36 AM

They filmed a large part of this piece of crap on the only road that goes to the area I live in. The film crew shut down this road several times a day without warning. They didn't bother informing us that they would be filming on this stretch of road or that they would closing of access to and from our homes. The production crew was rude to the locals, and when we complained about having our road blocked (which made me late to work) they claimed they didn't know anyone was living in the area, despite the fact that they set up camp 100 feet from our MAILBOXES. I have to wonder what they thought those mailboxes were for. Upon leaving, they left a ratty, torn up patch of earth where their trailers and trucks had been, and a huge semi-truck trailer full of garbage, which sat there for about another 3 months. Needless to say, there was no way in hell I was going to see this crappy movie even before I read this review. Thank you for letting me know I won't be missing anything.

Posted by: nikki at January 29, 2007 4:16 PM

Yah i live up that same road. What a bunch of pertentious pricks. WTF... if you're gonna be an ass about making a movie at least have the common courtesy to make it decent. the amount of crap i had to go through just to get to and from home everyday was horrendious. And in the end it still sucks goat balls... not that it could have done anything diffrent. In conclusion I will warn that if any Hollywood types try this crap anywhere near that area again I'm firebombing their whole setup.... and their first born children.

Posted by: joe at January 29, 2007 6:46 PM

Exactly what I thought when I finished watching it.

Luckily this will reach my home country (Italy) unnoticed and will end up on DVD unnoticed...

But it still exists. And that's an abomination in and of itself.

Posted by: marco at April 1, 2007 5:13 PM