free counter with statistics Halloween II Review | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

halloween1sm.jpg
You're lucky, he's lucky, I'm lucky, we're all lucky!


Halloween II / Agent Bedhead

Film Reviews | August 29, 2009 | Comments (33)


Rob Zombie, who not only directed but also wrote this latest installment in the Halloween franchise, has clearly intended to separate his vision from that of the legendary John Carpenter. As such, this movie is not a remake of Carpenter’s Halloween II. Instead, this is Zombie’s sequel to his own Halloween (2007) remake, and Zombie takes much more, how do you say, artistic license, to both positive but mostly negative effect, in this installment of the Michael Myers story. Instead of merely placing his serial killer in stalk-and-kill mode, Zombie’s sequel picks up right after his last movie ended and deals with how the characters are coping in the aftermath of Myers’ recent slaughterfest. In this way, this sequel is better than the last movie for the mere fact that Myers doesn’t have his ass in every frame, so the story has room to let a little suspense unfold and allow the other central characters a chance to expand past their previous one-dimensional confines. By the time the ride is over, however, it’s hard to believe that these are the very same characters, for Zombie pretty much pretends that original version of this sequel never happened and runs in an entirely different direction. If Zombie entirely intended to abandon his predecessor’s themes and desecrate the souls of certain central characters, perhaps he should have passed on Halloween II and made an altogether different project instead. Ahh, but that would defeat the point of a sequel, which is to capitalize upon an already-established audience.

In Halloween II, all of the returning characters are still portrayed by the same actors (with the exception of young MIchael, who is now played by Chase Vanek). And, if you’ll remember, Zombie ended his remake with Michael Myers (Tyler Mane) being shot several times by Dr. Samuel Loomis (Malcolm McDowell) before also taking a gunshot to the face from Laurie Strode (Scout Taylor-Compton). Dude has got to be dead, right?

Yeah, you know the drill.

The sequel actually opens promisingly, with Zombie shooting with a Super 16 and giving the film a grainy, almost swampy feel as opposed to the 35mm saturation of the first film. Laurie staggers down the street holding Loomis’ gun and is discovered by Sheriff Lee Brackett (Brad Dourif, giving the film’s best performance), who takes her to the hospital, along with Annie Brackett (Danielle Harris). Myers is presumed dead (what, no pulse check?) and shuttled off towards the coroner by two idiot drivers, who grow so distracted with talk of screwing corpses that they smash into a cow. Myers emerges from the wreckage and shuffles off towards an ethereal vision of his mother, Deborah Myers (Sheri Moon Zombie), and a white horse. Yes, it looks just as stupid as it sounds.

From there, it becomes apparent that there aren’t any genuine scares in store for the audience but only false alarms resulting directly from sudden loud, thumping noises that Zombie uses in lieu of a score. The plot has little in common with the original Halloween II other than the same basic characters and an abbreviated version of the hospital setting, which features a very hands-on, clinical perspective to the sewing up of Myers’ victims. Of course, the man himself soon arrives and commences brutally slaughtering nurses (complete with realistically disgusting stabbing noises) while attempting to locate his intended target. As Laurie escapes through the pouring rain to an outdoor guard shack and Myers is a good way through tearing the shack apart, the audience thinks, “Gee, this will be a short movie… maybe I’ll have time to pop over and catch Inglourious Basterds again,” but Zombie quickly pulls the old “Sorry, it was just a dream” trick. This wouldn’t be so awful if this shit didn’t happen several more times before the final act. In fact, Laurie is within Michael’s reach several times before the inevitable confrontation, but Zombie sadistically toys with his audience with just these sort of endlessly repeated cheap tricks. This has the dual effect of providing minimal entertainment while also insulting our intelligence because, most of the time, it feels like Zombie thinks he’s the only person who’s ever watched a horror movie.

For a year, Myers lives the vagrant lifestyle outside and only decides to return when his mother’s ghost (and that damn white horse) tells him to prepare for Halloween once again. When he returns, he miraculously knows how to find the new place where Laurie lives. Does he have a bitchin’ iPhone with some Mapquest thing? Probably not, but remember, this is a villain who supposedly possesses self-healing gunshot wounds. What ever the case, Myers easily locates Laurie, who is now living with Sheriff Brackett and his daughter (Annie, who has responded to her near-death experience by transforming into a recluse). Meanwhile, Laurie is progressively heading into reprobate territory; she manages to hold down a job and maintain the illusion of normalcy but, although she looks smashing in her party costume (Magenta of Rocky Horror Picture Show fame), she generally cannot be bothered to even brush her hair. This is either Zombie’s way of running a cheap budget by not hiring a hairdresser or visually communicating the unravelling of his protagonist. Obviously, Laurie has slowly been going crazy while experiencing intense nightmares that mirror Michael’s own visions, which leads me to my main problem with Halloween II

In the first movie, Zombie appeared to sympathize with Myers, placing much of the blame for his propensity to commit evil deeds squarely upon his white-trash, stripper-mom, abuser-stepdad upbringing. With Halloween II, Zombie switches sides in the “nature vs. nurture” debate and, in doing so, he does away with the strong female character played by Jamie Lee Curtis in Carpenter’s version of the sequel. Instead, Zombie nails Laurie into her fate and only offers up a nihilistic view of humanity. And, while I’d like to believe that breaking the preexisting rules was, perhaps, a gutsy move on Zombie’s part, it probably had a lot more to do with scriptwriting laziness. After all, once a filmmaker slaps the “crazy” label onto a character, nothing that they do has to make any sense at all. Of course, I could have walked out of that theater respecting Zombie’s decision to move in a different direction than the old sequel, but, if characters are gonna change, their transformations should be at least somewhat plausible. Instead, Zombie has also largely contradicted his own remake by, essentially, taking the stance that Myers’ motivation to kill is not revenge for childhood abuse but, rather, something that’s merely “in his blood.” Hell, once one also considers the insufferable cameo by Weird Al Yankovic (as himself), Halloween II, as a whole, is nothing but a masochistically depressive’s wet dream.

Agent Bedhead lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She and her little black heart can be found at agentbedhead.com.


The Final Destination Review | Box Office Results August 30, 2009



Comments

The Kennedy funeral was so moving.

Posted by: Guess Who! at August 29, 2009 3:45 PM

You'd think that with all of the times you say "Zombie" in this review the subject would be ten times better. Meh.

Posted by: Erin S at August 29, 2009 3:46 PM

I wish Rob Zombie would go back to making catchy dancey goth rock and stop making the exact same movie over and over again.

Or at least stop slapping the names of other peoples' movies on his one same movie and stick to his own one same movie names.

I dunno, I can't even muster up the requisite anger at his shenanigans anymore. All that comes out is "Meh." I am also completely unsurprised that he managed to crowbar his daughter into this movie too.

Posted by: Nat at August 29, 2009 3:50 PM

I didn't know Rob Zombie made music. I just thought he made up his last name as a tribute to horror movies.

Posted by: Guess Who! at August 29, 2009 3:57 PM

"Does he have a bitchin’ iPhone with some Mapquest thing?..."


That would be the, Google Victim Tracker app.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 29, 2009 4:25 PM

Really? Awww fuck it, I'm going to go see it anyway. I've heard a few good things from friends, so I'm looking forward to it. If, for any reason at all, to see people die...lots of people, real bloody like.

Posted by: Deistbrawler at August 29, 2009 4:49 PM

I can't wait to see where Rob Zombie takes Halloween 3. How will he change the Silver Shamrock masks? What will his magic evil robots look like, considering he enjoys working with small budgets and practical effects? Will he update the classic, not at all repetitive Silver Shamrock commercial song?


I'M THE REALLY EXCITED YOU GUYS!

Posted by: A. Biro at August 29, 2009 5:24 PM

"Does he have a bitchin’ iPhone with some Mapquest thing?"

I said the same thing, almost verbatim, to my sister when he was able to just walk on over to her house after impersonating Sasquatch for a year in the woods.

Anyway, I liked the movie. I am a little biased though, I like Zombie as a director. I may be throwing myself into the lions den in admitting that but hey, what can you say...the guy knows his horror movies.

While the movie was in no way scary, the amounts of violence and gore in the movie were enough to satiate my fucked up little head, so I was happy with it.

Also, the hours of drinking that I did before going to the midnight screening, which included multiple Jagers, maybe... just maybe, influenced my opinion on this one.

Posted by: ashes at August 29, 2009 5:25 PM

"Does he have a bitchin’ iPhone with some Mapquest thing?..."
---
He can smell her. Smells like fear.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at August 29, 2009 6:00 PM

Rob Zombie can have at the Halloween franchise all he wants, but once that sonofabitch starts messing with Rocky Horror, heads are gonna roll!

Posted by: Ariel at August 29, 2009 6:07 PM

The upside this boring useless movie? An A-Z marathon of the classic Halloween movies on Space last night.

Posted by: NoDice at August 29, 2009 6:33 PM

we just got home from seeing this film. holy shit, where to begin...

it sucked. there were so many actors in useless roles. and the main actors were really "actoring it up".

michael myers grows a beard and is some kind of vagabond. there were a ton of male characters with large teeth.

zombie's wife wears a lot of wigs. all the girls are skanky. the horse made us giggle.

if someone can explain the scene where the main character holds the baby pig, i will pay you money.

and the sort of dreadlocked hair.... who the hell has fake dreads in 2009? oh, wait, rob zombie does!

f this movie.

Posted by: glittergirl at August 29, 2009 8:47 PM

I didn't bother with this movie. Went to see Inglourious Basterds again. I regret nothing.

Posted by: Caillan at August 29, 2009 8:52 PM

You do know that the original "Halloween 2" was not directed by John Carpenter, but by Rick Rosenthal. Carpenter did write it (with Debra Hill). Carpenter was working on "The Fog" and wouldn't direct a sequel to one of his movies till "Escape from L.A."

Yeah, not a good choice.

As for Rob Zombie not getting the point...I think some other online review made the point that it sounds as if he picked the wrong horror series to remake. Giant killer that lives in the woods, picking off people and has mommy issues isn't Michael Myers. That's Jason Voorhees from Friday the 13th.

And the sad fact is that had Zombie gone with Friday the 13th, we might be applauding his ideas as innovative. By picking Halloween, he willingly put his work up against a master's work (in Carpenter's original) and he was found lacking.

Posted by: Fredo at August 29, 2009 11:03 PM

It was widely reported that Rob Zombie had no interest whatsoever in making Halloween 2.

It shows.

Yes, Mr. Zombie didn't want to do it. But he did it. Some sources claim that Dimension Films was going to go forth with their reboot of the franchise with or without Zombie's participation, so in the name of continuity and artistic integrity, Zombie caved and decided to complete his "extreme vision" of the Michael Myers saga.
As evidenced by the film I just saw, it's painfully apparent that they threw a shitload of money at him and he ran with the paycheck - artistic and franchise integrity be damned.

I am a Halloween purist. John Carpenter's iconic 1978 film is my all-time favorite in the genre. There is a "Hitchcockian" quality about that film that has rarely been surpassed. It is a stylish example of just how frightening a film can be with the right score, the right cast and the notion that what truly frightens is what you don't see - rather than what you do see in gruesome and gory detail. Halloween is a film that holds an audience in the throes of suspense - with a bare minimum of blood and gore.

Halloween is widely considered the granddaddy of the slasher genre. It was the film that launched a thousand maniacs - some that succeeded not on imitation, but in their ability to reinvent the wheel. However, in the face of new franchises, new masked and/or burned and deformed psychos, Halloween stood alone. In 1981, Halloween fell victim to it's own trap. It was inevitable there would be a sequel and as far as sequels go, the 1981 Halloween 2 was quite good. In fact, many franchise fans consider Halloween 1 and Halloween 2 to be one long film. After all, there is a seamless continuity to both films. H2 picks up right where H1 ends. Stylistically, it worked. H2 had far more gore than it's predecessor. It was almost a necessary evil. After all, from 1978 to 1981, the horror genre had begun to become more about upping the ante in the gore factor. More blood, more guts, more bucks.

When Zombie's H1 was released, I went into it with a great fear that we were about to see a total train wreck. Much to my surprise, it wasn't. Zombie had written a relatively cohesive backstory for young Michael Myers, showing a cycle of abuse, abandonment and dysfunction that led Michael down the proverbial "Psycho Path." Interesting? Somewhat. The only major flaw in that backstory is that it takes the mystery away from the Myers mythology. It's more frightening not to know what makes him so relentless rather than chalking it up to a textbook case of abuse. The main problem that Zombie encountered in making H1 was when the story moved from the original backstory to the remaking of Carpenter's film. The familiar characters became stilted and uninteresting. The storytelling became rushed and truncated. Moreover, the ending became too quick and far too much of a cop out. However, I actually found myself enjoying Zombie's new take on Halloween. No, it would never replace the original, but it wasn't a total failure. I knew it was going to be a difficult balancing act to remake such an iconic film, but I thought that Zombie put his spin on it and managed to be respectful to Carpenter and make the second half of the film more of an homage.

I wondered how long it was going to take for a sequel to rear it's head. I read Zombie state in multiple interviews that since Laurie had blown Michael's head off, there would be no H2 from him. I knew damn well that was a disingenuous statement. Few horror films have endings that are final or absolute. If there is gold to be mined from the masses, they'll find any way possible to resurrect the dead.

Zombie's H2 has none of the redeeming qualities of his H1. This is a mishmash. An unfocused, Headbanger's Ball video, chock full of jumpcuts, wrapped in a paper thin screenplay that bears little or no resemblance to the original H2. It turns familiar characters inside out and makes them unsympathetic, abrasive and flat-out annoying. The one absolute in the horror genre is that you must truly have some sort of empathy with the characters. I found myself rooting for Michael Myers. He's the only character that truly elicits any sort of pity. Why? Because Zombie is making a futile attempt to continue his backstory that he created in H1. While you should feel sorry for a child from an abusive home, it's rather difficult to feel anything for a 7 foot behemoth lurching around and hacking everyone in sight just because the world has been unjust and unfair. That's predictable and uninteresting. In an effort to explain and perhaps justify Michael's actions, Zombie brings back his wife, Sherri Moon Zombie as Michael's mother Deborah Myers. This time, she's not the tortured mother wondering where she went wrong. She's a guardian angel of death, dressed in white satin and perpetually accompanied by the young version of Michael and a white horse (???) She exhorts Michael to kill for her, as killing his sister is a surefire way to bring their broken family back together. The "Kill for Mommie" tactic totally emasculates Michael. It robs him of his malevolence and makes it seem as if Zombie couldn't come up with anything better than a redux of Jason Voorhees' old M.O. from Friday the 13th. Yes, you might feel pity for Michael in this state.. but for the totally wrong reasons.

Another huge misstep is the moral judgment of good and bad that figures into the majority of horror films. Most horror films have stock characters that you intuitively know should and WILL get their comeuppance. In H2, Zombie's screenplay makes it difficult to feel one way or the other about the people who are on the receiving end of the brutality. The wholesale butchering of the ancillary characters are largely unmotivated and seem like nothing more than a gore quotient filler. Zombie has always had a fascination with grotesques. Characters in all of his films seem to have some sort of grunge or physical oddity, H2 is no exception. It's practically a toothless redneck-fest at times. When those characters make Michael look almost normal, something goes terribly awry.

Scout Compton Taylor's Laurie is ostensibly supposed to be on this tortured emotional journey of survival. Taylor seems to stay on two levels throughout the film - she cries and screams or alternatively acts like a spoiled brat. The only moment in which you feel as if her character might have an epiphany is when she discovers that she is Michael's sister. In that moment, you hope she will find that Jamie Lee Curtis survivalist spunk - but she never does. Instead, she goes back into her established pattern. I won't spoil the half-assed ending, but Zombie's fate for Laurie was basically ripped from the finale of Halloween 4 - and it's just as unoriginal as Michael's "Kill for Mommie" directive.

The most horrific error in the screenplay was to turn Dr. Sam Loomis, once again played by Malcolm McDowell, into a huge punchline. Loomis is no longer the benevolent doctor, relentlessly pursuing the inner workings of Michael's mind. He's now a comic figure that has been transfigured into a media whore, selling sensationalist books on Michael and behaving like a diva. It's a pathetic attempt to inject humor into the script and it fails miserably. Loomis was always the moral compass of the Halloween franchise. He was the one factor that was a necessary constant. He knew that Michael was the personification of evil, and he was the only person who could remotely stop Michael and make him think. Now that Zombie's backstory voided the pure evil mythology, Loomis becomes extraneous. The screenplay does give Loomis a halfhearted attempt at redemption towards the end of the film, but it's too little, too late.

I'd like to take the sound effects editor for this film out into a field and horsewhip him. Every murder is punctuated by Foley overkill. I fully expected each slice of the knife or crunch to be accompanied by a 1960's Batman-style title card (Kerplunk! THUD! SHWAP!) There's also a massive failure on Zombie's part this time around with the film's scoring. The iconic Halloween theme and the Laurie's theme are nowhere to be heard until the last 60 seconds of the film. Carpenter's score is an essential element that makes or breaks any Halloween film. Even the most mediocre of them all feature that music - or variations thereof.

H2 has moments that attempt to be artistic - particularly in the multiple dream sequences - but all of them left me bored rather than visually engrossed. Yes, H2 has some massive failings, but none more tragic than Zombie's failure to maintain suspense. He telegraphs each intended shock so far in advance, there is simply no element of surprise. No jumps, no startles. You see it coming a mile away and all you have left is the mechanics of the method of dispatch. I think the only genuine startle I got in this film was to see Margot Kidder as Laurie's psychologist. It was shocking to see Lois Lane looking like a weathered leather handbag after 20 years in a combination meth lab and psych ward.

The the thing about Michael Myers that has made this character (and this franchise) endure for over 30 years lies in the simple fact that he IS the Boogeyman. He's the thing we fear most. He's the monster in the closet. He is pure evil. In this story, he's been reduced to a mama's boy with some deep emotional scars. What's most scary about H2 is what Rob Zombie has done to the boogeyman.

Fortunately, there IS hope for the franchise. John B.DeHaas has written a MUSICAL version of Halloween that is premiering in Orlando in October. This musical may be the only thing that will remove the bad taste that Rob Zombie's film has left in my mouth.


Posted by: Mike at August 30, 2009 1:41 AM

This movie was straight up Murder Porn. Zombie is convinced he's an auteur, a revolutionary film-making genius. You know what? I'm convinced that he's a fucking HACK. Each kill went about 30 seconds too long as Myers kills somebody, stops, then inexplicably continues to hack the sweet ungodly motherfuck out of his victim. I liked the first film, too, but like AB says, he basically abandoned anything that made the first film likable or good in favor of some psychological rejiggering of all the primary characters and weird ghostly hallucinations.

And not that I really care, but this movie should have been titled "Halloween II: Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fucking Fucker Fuck", what with all the exclamations of the word. I think they may have out"fuck"ed Scarface.

Posted by: Venture82 at August 30, 2009 1:44 AM

I was willing to give the dude a chance with one of my favorite franchises because I liked his 1000 Corpses and Rejects, but he didn't come through.
I think he had some good ideas, and had the ability to deliver a good couple of films, but he got excited and spasmed before he got the sock in place, and instead spurted us in the eye.

Posted by: Rykker at August 30, 2009 4:06 AM

Mike
Was that a review? I stopped about a paragraph in and went fuck it...

So...limit yourself...

I'm just saying.

Comment....

Posted by: Deistbrawler at August 30, 2009 5:18 AM

Jesus Christ Mike, “War and Peace” was a shorter read.

Posted by: Guess Who! at August 30, 2009 8:36 AM

I have absolutely no interest in reading the review or even entertaining the thought of seeing this movie.

However, I did giggle when I read the title, and then supplied the appropriate callback line. Out loud.

The banister is lucky, indeed.

Posted by: That Girl at August 30, 2009 11:43 AM

Mike,

Get a blog.

Posted by: Eyvi at August 30, 2009 11:50 AM

Scout Taylor-Compton? Dressed as Magenta?

The bannister is lucky.

Posted by: PissBoy at August 30, 2009 1:47 PM

Not that it matters, Nat, but Sherri Moon is Rob Zombie's wife, not his daughter. Carry on.

Posted by: puregonzo at August 30, 2009 2:07 PM

Alcohol causes you to lower your standards in other-than-sexual ways? Makes you a mumbling dolt? No way!

Posted by: Recondite at August 30, 2009 4:04 PM

zombies usually don't disappoint me this much.

you guys know i'll go to the slashing of a tire, but this was just a mess. even the bloody messes were bloody messes (aside from the bloody footprint on the girls' bathroom wall, which was awesome.)
brad dourif *should have been* in every scene, but no, zombie's wife had to ham it up.

and Do Not Get Me Started on the pissing on of canon.

i DID like what he did with the 1st movie. i liked the back story when michael was both at home/school and at the sanitarium. i liked the back end with laurie et all. it took the slowest parts of the original and sped them up for my now shorter attention span.

i can't believe i'm saying this, but i probably won't even buy this one.

Posted by: gp at August 30, 2009 4:53 PM

Yeah for the RHPS tagline....that's it...

Posted by: Luke at August 30, 2009 9:54 PM

Thanks puregonzo and co., I stand corrected on the daughter comment. Strike that, reverse it. Wife, he found another way to crowbar his wife in. ^_^ It may not matter, but being the stickler for details that I am, I like knowing if I got one wrong.

Posted by: Nat at August 30, 2009 11:44 PM

All that I can say is I was trying desperately to find even ONE thing that I liked about this movie, but there is nothing here for Halloween series fans, original Halloween II fans, Rob Zombie fans, or slasher movie fans. This film was a total "You hated my last one, well eat this suckers" from Zombie. What a disgusting, pointless, non-entertaining piece of garbage. I love the Halloweens, when I heard Zombie was remking the original I couldn't wait to see it, then was disappointed. I saw this hoping to see a loose remake of the 1981 Hallowwen II, or at least something a little clever that was new if that's what Zombie was going for. Instead I feel like he held me at knifepoint for the price of admission. Even Halloween 6 was a better picture, fans of the series know what that means! The music was horrible (no recognizable themes until the final two minutes), the characters all did a complete 180, Michael was portrayed almost as a member of the Leatherface wannabe fan club, and the ending made NO sense. SPOILER ALERT (Don't read if you don't want the "plot" spoiled), after taking numerous close range direct gunshots, Michael is finally shot again by police snipers, then eventually dies by being impaled on sharp farm equipment. If the police hit him, why don't they storm the shack? And why is this farm stuff so fatal? And what's with the stupid white horse, does Zombie have endorsements from Columbia Tristar or something. The whole movie should have stayed on the editing room floor. Thank you

Posted by: Ryan T at August 30, 2009 11:47 PM

I have to say, H1 was not bad. It wasn't a great movie, but it wasn't a horrible film. H2, however, is the worst movie I have ever seen in my life, and I own American Psycho 2: All American Girl.

The plot made n o goddamn sense, the fucking characters weren't even the same! NOt just from the original, thought they certainly were different in that respect, but they were different characters than H1!

And special message to R. Zombie- having a character say the work fuck 20 times does not count as dialogue. Hire a decent writer, hack.

2nd special message to R. Zombie- if I ever see you I am going to kick you in the junk until you give me my $8 back. And the $8 for my brother. He has Mike Meyers tattooed on his arm, asshole.

Posted by: TWoP Fan at September 5, 2009 10:16 AM

watch Halloween II online

http://bit.ly/qeppb

Posted by: MegaMovies at September 7, 2009 7:03 AM

My friend tole me a great place ____ W E A L T H Y S O C I A L . C O M ____. The best club for seeking the rich singles, sexy beauties and even hot celebs..I think everyone need to meet some miracle after all the terrible stuff in the news and the economy.——____——

Posted by: happyone11 at September 8, 2009 12:50 PM

Review is spot on. Lazy storyline. As with all sequels, Halloween II is gorier....but plot is thinner than amy winehouse. This movie is a subtle as a sledgehammer, with zero intrigue. Zombie needs to read an idiots guide to movie plots. Not sure he has the finesse needed as a writer...maybe should stick to directing.
Roger

Posted by: roger at September 14, 2009 11:29 AM

I seriously have to question why many of you so-called horror fans even bother going to the trouble of watching films these days. It is due to gore hounds like yourselves that horror films have seen such a HUGE decline in quality over the years. I also have to question why so many of you LIKE seeing people suffer on-screen...

Point blank question: why do you like watching people killed? What makes you happy about watching people being stabbed, mutilated, pulled to bits, etc etc etc? Something about the gore must turn you on. Obviously many horror films contain the odd bit of violence/gore, but it's becoming increasingy THE reason to make/watch the film these days. Sod the story or anything else. There's no STYLE or CLASS. Maybe take a month or two out in Afganistan and see the real thing if you're that into seeing people suffer horrible deaths? Might change your tune about how coollll violence is...

Horror films used to be FUN because you WERE scared. You bareky needed any gore. There's a difference between being scared, and being grossed out. ANY goddamn hack can write a lame story and throw bucket loads of gore at the audience - it takes an intelligent writer/director to actually create suspense. The original Halloween was a classic for exactly these reasons. Plus the director knows how to make a good film, pacing, structuring, STORY-telling, MUSIC. There's hardly ANY gore in it, and yet it packs a punch and has more atmosphere than movie Zombie could conjure up. Same goes for Psycho, and any other number of classic horror flics out there (which all appear to be being remade - badly - by just upping the gore/torture levels).

I'm pretty freaked where this is all heading personally - a hole new generation to whom watching people suffer does nothing to them, and is the soul reason they goto see horror films. Sad. Very sad.

Posted by: Grim Reaper at September 23, 2009 4:27 PM