hairspray-travolta.jpg


Say It, Don’t Spray It

Hairspray / Ranylt Richildis

Film Reviews | July 21, 2007 | Comments (59)


You can’t say you’ve paid your film-critic dues these days until you’ve reviewed a man-in-a-female-fat-suit movie. Don’t get me wrong — Eddie Murphy, Tyler Perry and Martin Lawrence were all mercifully absent. It could have been so, so, so much worse is the refrain that eventually formed itself into some kind of melody in my brain as I watched Hairspray, the twice-removed cousin of John Waters’ 1988 camp classic. I forced myself optimistic, in fact, by pointing out to my inner bitchmudgeon that, at the very least, John Travolta’s piggy-eyed smugness was concealed from view behind a hundred pounds of synthetic flab — it’s those small kindnesses that count, really, wouldn’t you say? You can take me to task all you want for focusing on either Travolta or the fat suit; stuff like this needs to be worked out of my system. It’s just — John Travolta, people. This is the man who made even Pulp Fiction unwatchable for me all those years ago and, as someone who can appreciate better Tarantino, it sticks in my craw. It doesn’t matter that Adam Shankman’s Hairspray retread is getting positive reviews elsewhere, or that John Waters was involved in the remake as both producer and pervy trenchcoat flasher (how perfectly Waters-ish!); it was still Travolta I was subjected to. In a musical. Camping it up.

As it turns out, neither the musical nor Travolta was onerous enough to kill me outright (the note with the name of my next of kin pinned to my shirt turned out to be unnecessary, as was the mop I’d toted along to scour up the regurgitated popcorn buds I fully expected to spew). In fact, there was only minimal seat-squirmage on my part, and I suspect fans of happy-happy-fun-world Broadway productions will be sufficiently suffonsified by Hairspray. The dancing is slick and energetic, the costumes are candy-coated, and Michelle Pfeiffer is screen-goddess radiant. Hairspray has the Broadway musical formula down, and the players are game to give it their all. Nikki Blonsky, stepping into Ricki Lake’s shoes as Tracy Turnblad, lives up to the role but doesn’t bring anything new to it. And while Travolta is no Divine, he does manage a performance quite a bit more dialed-down than I’d been expecting. Honestly, it’s hard for me to admit this. I was all set to parrot Pandagon’s excoriation of Travolta for mocking womanhood rather than merely being a woman (which Divine managed to transmit in the original version). While I still think Divine’s Edna Turnblad is more three-dimensional, Travolta was (at least until film’s end) surprisingly subtle and sweet — for a smarmy homophobe poured into a hundred pounds of faux femme, anyway.

Waters’ story about a chubby misfit who breaks onto the beautiful-people soundstage and kills segregation with kindness is mostly intact (although the second half of the film switches up several of the original film’s plot points). Tracy Turnblad and her best friend, Penny Pingleton (Amanda Bynes), habitually rush home from school to catch their favorite teen do-wop/dance program, the Corny Collins show. Tracy, apparently, can really dance, but the “thin” barrier, like the race barrier, prevents the overweight and the non-white from fully participating in the fun in 1960’s Baltimore. Despite the show’s sympathetic host (played by James Marsden), its producers are bent on “steering viewers in the white direction” and holding tight to 1950s American values. But Tracy’s enthusiasm wins her a spot on the show, a legion of fans, a dress-shop endorsement, and the admiration of the show’s staple heartthrob, Link Larkin (Zac Efron). Her on-camera presence also turns out to be a political catalyst that helps to usher in integration and, in the case of this version (which owes more to the Broadway production than to Waters’ original), inspires an alarming number of song-and-dance routines — some of which are, admittedly, halfway charming.

The original Hairspray found eternal life thanks to its unusual cast (Sonny Bono, Debbie Harry, Jerry Stiller, Pia Zadora), its sweet, if simplistic, discourse on racial politics and difference, and better do-wop like Lesley Gore’s “You Don’t Own Me.” It starts out a little weak but slowly wins you over despite its naivety and the fact that Tracy really doesn’t dance any better than any of the other kids on the soundstage (a curiosity that surfaces in the remake as well). There’s something genuine at the core of Waters’ freak-parade — it’s one of his least provocative films, so designed to prevent its subcultural elements from upstaging the film’s gentle message about acceptance. Shankman’s Hairspray, conversely, suffers from the contrast effect — not against the original version, so much, but within its own structure. Its very effort and proportion reveal just how tinny its message really is, and just how unrealistically tidy the struggle for integration is presented. Except for two or three characters, everyone appears to really really just want folks to get along — to which I say, if only. The politics in Waters’ version were never penetrating, either, but the understated approach to the film made the substance-vacuum seem less yawning. There, the political content felt more like a framework for all the campy delights Waters trotted out. The in-your-faceness of Shankman’s more corporate version turns the fragile backbone of the commentary to jelly. Now we really notice that, in Hairspray’s world, racism only seems to exist as an institution, not as a widespread character flaw; most everyone’s just so jim-dandy ready to put the fat and the dark on a lime-lit pedestal because (shucks) people are just so great and accepting when those mean old rules get lifted.

Apart from that (which probably won’t be much of an issue for its core demographic), the new Hairspray gives as much as it takes. On the one hand, the casting recommends itself to fans of Christopher Walken, Allison Janney and Jerry Stiller (who returns in the role, this time, of Mr. Pinky, owner of the Hefty Hideaway dress shop). Seaweed (Elijah Kelley) is, as in the original version, the most magnetic character onscreen; just like Clayton Prince, Kelley is a fine-lovely specimen of lean male youth who can dance like a whip and steal his scenes without trying. On the other hand, Queen Latifah struggles to live up to the imprint left by Ruth Brown, who incarnated Motormouth Maybelle in Waters’ film. Amanda Bynes’ skin is laughably orange (a peculiar sight when dialogue and song lyrics keep referring to her lily-whiteness as one half of an interracial love-affair). Hairspray the Second is a little too in love with itself for my taste; I kept waiting to buy into it and couldn’t quite get there. But still, as a rabid disdainer of remakes, Travolta and musicals, I could still spot some good through my tears of distress. Which probably means that Hairspray’s got something going for it, if you have a cast-iron show-tunes tummy and a love of vacuous glee. I’m not built to commit to this kind of film, but it’s got all the potential to be a dream-date for those who appreciate the genre.

Ranylt Richildis can be found sneezing in college libraries or dropping chalk in lecture halls. She’s somehow managed to squeeze in a film or two a day for the last decade.


I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry | Steaming as It Ever Was





Comments

I'm a born and raised Broadway fan, and a fan of Waters' films (and Divine by association). I've been huffing and puffing over Travolta's casting since the get-go, but now I'm seemingly losing my snarking ground.
I'm still not sure if I'll go see it, just on anti-Travolta principle, but it just may sneak onto my Netflix queue.

Posted by: Anne at July 21, 2007 11:54 AM

Well, although I have no intention of seeing this movie, your initial description of Travolta sounds like the look on my face every time I hear of him or see him in a movie. Thank you for that.

Posted by: Girl with Curious Hair at July 21, 2007 12:00 PM

I still can't believe it. Hairspray the remake?! The original film is one of my all time favourites and the fact that J Waters is involved in the remake BREAKS my heart :(

Posted by: jd at July 21, 2007 12:25 PM

not the biggest fan of travolta myself, but in no way is he a homophobe...

Posted by: alex at July 21, 2007 12:31 PM

I loved the original and generally like Broadway-type stuff, so normally, I'd probably go see this. But every time I've seen a trailer or ad for this movie, the mere sight of Travolta in drag creeps me out beyond belief. Even though this review leads me to believe that he's not as god-awful as I thought he'd be, I still don't think I can stomach 2 hours of fat-lady Travolta.

Posted by: meshell at July 21, 2007 1:08 PM

I took my grandmother and twelve-year old cousin to see this yesterday. Having been a fan of the original movie and a life-long lover of musicals, this was a little too sugary even for me. I had a headache at the end of it.

Posted by: Lexie at July 21, 2007 1:25 PM

Travolta's a member of the largest "ex-gay" cult in the world - Scientology (and here I'm leaving the Catholic church aside - the last few years have put the lie to any "ex-" inclinations there...Yikes.)

Self-hating homophobes are still homophobes. The more so, really.

Posted by: K at July 21, 2007 1:26 PM

I don't know if Travolta actually believes the anti-gay philosophy of Scientology's founder, L. Ron Hubbard, but Hubbard wrote extensively on his belief that homosexuality is an aberrant mental deviation. My understanding is that Scientology has not backed away from Hubbard's homophobic beliefs; so Travolta is a member of an anti-gay cult.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at July 21, 2007 2:23 PM

I've sworn off of Travolta. He's blown too many chances, and done too much garbage.

But Ranylt, you continue to impress with your reviews. Keep it up!

Posted by: TK at July 21, 2007 2:30 PM

Most excellent review, Ranylt! I'm glad you've continued to write reviews for this site.

Your feelings on Travolta mirror mine almost exactly. I can't watch anything with him in it. Not even Pulp Fiction (though I love Tarantino films) or Get Shorty.

Posted by: stardust savant at July 21, 2007 3:43 PM

'Suffonsified' is now my new favorite word. Thank you.

I really like Hairspray. Even the musical - much to my my great shame and my neighbor's great dismay at hearing strains of 'Good Morning Baltimore' blasting from my apartment (Good morning, Baltimore/Everyday's like an open door!) Recently, I went to the Honfest in B-more to witness the fab beehives and groovy duds that inspired the costumes/era for Hairspray. Never once during the movie, musical or fest did I think, "You know who could really rock a beehive, fake breasts and a B-more hon attitude? John Travolta!"

So, after reading your snazztastic review, I think I feel ok about skipping this and not ruining one of my favorites.

Posted by: Constance at July 21, 2007 5:30 PM

"...and here I'm leaving the Catholic church aside - the last few years have put the lie to any 'ex-' inclinations there...Yikes."

Are you referring to the cases of sexual abuse within the Catholic Church, or to the programs that claim to be able to "de-gay" someone? To my knowledge, the latter are associated with evangelical and fundamentalist groups, and while I'm no fan of the Church, I think it's important to stress that pedophilia and homosexuality are two completely different things.

Posted by: Geetch at July 21, 2007 6:44 PM

Much to my own dismay, I have to admit that I absolutley love this musical and the original pretty equally though differently. I saw this yesterday in all my guilt ridden glory and enjoyed everything but Travolta. I just couldn't get past it. I tried to give him a chance but he was just still the runner up at a local gay club's amateur night drag show, trying hard but not quite there. Still, it is sugary sweet fun if that is your guilty pleasure.

Posted by: Jackers at July 21, 2007 6:52 PM

I enjoy watching Travolta even when he performs in crap (Swordfish anyone?), and really can't understand the hate...but then again most folks can't understand my absolute loathing of Tom "FemmeBitch" Cruise.

I'm from Baltimore originally, have watched all Water's films and loved all of them (even Serial Mom), so I went into this one with the understanding that I wouldn't like it as much as the original, but I probably would think it was at least okay. I really enjoyed it. Enough so, in fact that when my sister wanted to go and asked me if I wanted to see it again, I said sure and it wasn't even a matinee.

Posted by: Adam C at July 21, 2007 6:52 PM

Whether or not Travolta buys into the Scientology anti-gay stance, he certainly didn't have a problem requesting extra special massages while filming Hairspray in Toronto. In fact, it was also at that time that he was photographed kissing a man on the lips at the Hamilton Airport. For some reason, that seems to have been pushed aside.

In any case, I think I would see the movie if not for the fact that Travolta is so creepy looking with the fat suit that it's distracting. I will probably wait until the DVD so that I can fast forward his parts.

Posted by: Nicole at July 21, 2007 7:31 PM

Apparently, John Travolta missed the memo that Edna Turnblad was an obese housewife and instead channeled a retarded mid-western Captain Jack Sparrow when he spoke any line in the film. Insufferable unless he was dancing.

And compared to the stage musical, this was downright demented.

Posted by: Robert at July 21, 2007 10:14 PM

"bitchmudgeon"

Ha! That's the best new word I've heard today.

Posted by: lunabelle at July 21, 2007 10:19 PM

John Travolta was wearing a fat suit in this movie??!!!?? Isn't he fat enough already?

Posted by: Dano at July 21, 2007 10:30 PM

John Travolta refuses to enrol his autistic in any kind and all kinds of therapy either...so, bad actor, worse father.

Posted by: M at July 22, 2007 1:16 AM

At a Braves game last night, there was a guy sitting near me wearing a fat suit with a bikini who tried to get "the wave" started about every three seconds. I found him slightly less annoying than Travolta in the Hairspray trailers.

Posted by: kimmyhula at July 22, 2007 12:47 PM

I'm not psyched that this was remade as a Broadway musical and then remade again as a movie based on the Broadway musical. But I can't hate on John Waters for allowing it one little bit because I think he should be insanely rich - like rolling around in huge piles of money, gold and jewels rich - because he totally fucking deserves it.

That being said, I don't know if I can bring myself to lay eyes on this movie. I feel like it would dishonor the memory of Divine. Although I'm sure he's in Heaven cracking up at how John Travolta clearly LOVES being in drag.

Posted by: chriso at July 22, 2007 1:03 PM

John Travolta refuses to enrol his autistic in any kind and all kinds of therapy either...so, bad actor, worse father.

And according to him, the kid isn't autistic, oh no. He had some kind of "allergic reaction" to a chemical their carpet cleaners used. I know I read this somewhere, am I right? Hee, I'm loving the Travolta bashing.

Posted by: Gudrun at July 22, 2007 3:09 PM

As Waters' put it in an interview, any money this mainstream movie makes for him will effectively go to a non-mainstream film budget. So if you can get past Travlota, see it!

Posted by: Crackers at July 22, 2007 4:03 PM

Dudes and dudettes, what's with the hate? I saw this movie earlier today, and no, it's not a flourishing W in the 'Films that Matter' column, but it is SO much fun, and that's the point, isn't it? I found it impossible not to sing along and tap my feet to the songs, not to think Wilbur Turnblad's dorkiness and Edna's obesity were endearing, and not to just appreciate the simplicity of it.


As for the Travolta bashing, I don't get that, either. I guess I can understand it- I'm sure there's someone I can't stand to watch in anything, although off the top of my head I can't think of anyone. As for him being a homophobe, there was an interview in the NY Times a few days ago in which he discussed Scientology's stance on homosexuality versus his own, and although I can't quote it for you, it made me personally feel better about his stance (the article is in the premium, pay-to-read section of the site now). As for his son's autism, this is the first I heard of that. I know I'm playing the devil's advocate here, but isn't it possible that he could be both a bad father and a good actor? Please note that's not an acceptance of bad parenting, just a comment that the two aren't tied together.

Posted by: Hannah at July 22, 2007 9:46 PM

I saw it last night, and I actually loved it. Although, any scenes involving Christopher Walken and John Travolta made me a little uncomfortable.

The singing and dancing were pretty good, Nikki Blonski is ADORABLE and there were some really great one-liners in there.

Posted by: KatyBelle at July 22, 2007 9:49 PM

So many people here are saying it's "OK"...why oh WHY would you spend near $10 going to see a movie that is only "ok"?

And no, I cannot see this, aside from the HUGE issue of Travolta in it.....I dont want to take anything good away from the original by watching this filth.

I wasnt happy about the Broadway either.

Posted by: Elizebeth at July 22, 2007 11:02 PM

I can't help, while reading this, thinking that you've sort of missed the point of the movie version of Hairspray. Comparing it to the John Waters original is pretty...stupid, actually, because it's not even directly based on that film! And really, why you couldn't give your opinion on the movie itself as opposed to the movie-as-a-descendant. Know what I mean?

I also find your fixation on John Travolta as "unwatchable" pretty childish. If musicals aren't your thing then you might have considered seeing if somebody else could've written the review for this one.

Hairspray the show -- which is what this movie is based on, by the by -- is intended to be a solidly fun romp with joyful singing and dancing, while still raising a point or two about equality and being different and how it's not really the end of the world.

Posted by: Telis at July 23, 2007 12:31 AM

^5 Telis! Hairspray is not great art; it is not meant to be. It is great fun and a pleasant distraction from the real world. I do not like Travolta as a person--given his self-hating homophobia--but he turns in consistently good performances, even in the usual dreck he chooses. Seriously Ranylt, if you do not like musicals and are so inherently biased against Travolta, why did you not ask someone else to review this movie? That said you still gave it an overall positive review, despite all your admitted prejudices. Michelle Pfeiffer and Christopher Walken by themselves were worth the price of admission. Add newcomers Efron, Blonsky and especially Prince and you have genuine talent abundantly on display. There are few better ways to spend a sultry summer afternoon.

Posted by: rudy at July 23, 2007 7:21 AM

I've never understood why people who hate movies or certain actors review movies. What's the point? A movie review should be like a good editorial. UNBIASED! The reviewer should review the movie on its own merits and leave their personal preferences out of the story. I realise that a little personal preference will seep into the review, but I had to dig through paragraphs full of Broadway Musical Travolta hate to figure out that this reviewer begrudgingly liked the movie.

Posted by: BWeaves at July 23, 2007 9:55 AM

I've never understood why people who hate movies or certain actors review movies.

Um... maybe because any given member of the audience loves/hates certain genres or actors? I, for one, enjoy reading about a reviewer's personal tastes and how that colors their enjoyment of the movie.

This isn't Intro to Film Studies, people - a review is an opinion.

Posted by: alanna at July 23, 2007 10:33 AM

Thank you, alanna.

Also: A movie review should be like a good editorial. UNBIASED!

WTF?! Who told you this?

Posted by: Jerce at July 23, 2007 12:12 PM

New voices on Pajiba often get a tough time of it, but I've been really impressed with each review you've done so far here.


As someone who very much is a fan of musicals, they come very much in two genres. Some involve a bit more thinking and a relatively complex look at issues, Les Mis and Into the Woods are two of my favourites. Others are brain candy fun. While Hairspray tries to be one of the latter (and it definitely fits the light on brain power definition with it's simplistic take on issues and neat wrap endings) it simply not fun enough, catchy enough, or (pardon the expression) big enough to truly be brain candy fun.

Posted by: Tiki at July 23, 2007 12:25 PM

Hannah, as stated in my first comment, I have no idea what Travolta actually believes. But here are the facts: (a) Travolta is a devoted member of the cult of Scientology; (b) The cult's doctrine is founded on the writings of L. Ron Hubbard; (c) Hubbard's writings contain numerous homophobic statements that are still part of the cult's doctrine.

M and Gudrun are also correct that Travolta (along with Mother of the Year Kim Preston) has recklessly ignored his son's treatable autism because addressing the condition would conflict with Scientology's teachings that mental illness does not exist as a medical condition. I assume Travolta loves his son, so refusing to treat him on religious grounds means that Travolta is a pretty devout, albeit batshit crazy Scientologist.

Like many actor-Scientologists, Travolta also loves money. He understands that being openly anti-gay would be career suicide. As inept as Hollywood is at conveying messages about tolerance of gays, Hollywood itself is very tolerant of and reliant upon homosexual artists and professionals, some of whom hold positions of influence in movie studios. So it's hardly suprising (and not unprecedented) that Travolta tries to distance himself from bigoted Scientology doctrine. Various Scientologists have tried to run from Hubbard's anti-gay ranting to protect their image while still remaining true to the cult. (That was also the only way they could recruit Tom Cruise.)

(Note to BWeaves: An unbiased reviewer would be a poor one indeed. The best reviewers must have at least some expertise or fluency with the subject matter, which means long exposure to the subject matter, which inevitably means the development of preferences and opinions. The comparison to editorials is puzzling, because editorials are biased opinion pieces about news, not unbiased journalism -- that's why they're usually not on the front page as news. Bias is not, by itself, a negative thing -- it depends on what the target is. Neutrality and objectivity are illusions, and they wouldn't provide much guidance even if they were available.)

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at July 23, 2007 1:35 PM

Geez people, this is "Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People" and you don't even get sarcasm when you hear it. Obviously my comment when way over your head.

Posted by: Bweaves at July 23, 2007 2:49 PM

Yeah, that's obviously what happened, BWeaves, it was so great that li'l ol' me couldn't get it.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at July 23, 2007 5:11 PM

socalledonlycousins: I understand your point, and do not wish to disagree with it. That doesn't mean that I'm agreeing with it, though. Saying "Travolta is homophobic because he's a Scientologist, and it's part of their doctrine," is like saying no Catholics use contraceptives because it goes against Catholic doctrine. It's just a fallacy in argument. (I realize this was not your argument, just evidence; I'm just showing that it's not a valid point alone).


So, sure, the possibility for John Travolta as a homophobe is out there and seems somewhat likely. But I have never seen that affect his work (I certainly haven't seen all of his work, either). The day there's a conflict between what I'm paying to seem him for- his acting and believability as a character- and his beliefs, sure I'll lose faith in his work. I just haven't seen it.


As for BWeaves' point, I agree with what I think you're saying. Reviews are most definitely opinions, as are editorials. But no editorialist worth his salt judges President Bush's stance on the war in Iraq based on him being homophobic, or having big ears, or being unable to pronounce 'nuclear' correctly. It is my hope that a reviewer would not base their published opinion of a film on whether one of the actors followed tenets of his religion/cult that the reviewer did not agree with.

Posted by: Hannah at July 23, 2007 5:49 PM

What is it with the female reviewers bearing the brunt of the bullshit condescension and/or passive-aggressive, although sometimes direct, demands to rewrite reviews?

Damn, I sure do miss the days when people would just disagree with a review without resorting to borderline insults. Pajiba must have some kind of power to coerce others into coming onto the site and reading the reviews. Can I get this power? Is it transferable?? I have a sugar daddy or two I need to influence so that I can relinquish this life of toil and suffering and live in the lap of luxury.

Posted by: Daphne at July 23, 2007 9:19 PM

Daphne, who exactly do you see wanting this review re-written? I can only speak for myself, but I sure hope you're not finding me guilty of that. As much as I don't think this review is fair to Travolta, I would never demand someone re-do their job because I don't agree with the way they did it. It's how they do things. I don't like it- so what?

And I almost missed the point of your second paragraph due to your generous coating of sarcasm, but once I reread it, I got it: we don't have to come here. Damn straight we don't. But does that mean that just because we choose to come here, we have to agree with everything the reviewers write? Because that is a site that will be removed from my bookmarks awfully quickly.

Posted by: Hannah at July 23, 2007 9:46 PM

Well, I can't say that would be any skin off my back, but do what you have to do.

For the record, no, Hannah, I wasn't referring to you. More like a responding to a trend I've noticed for the last few weeks (maybe couple of months?) as well as a couple of comments in this review. Also, for the record, I don't have a problem with someone disagreeing with a review. If you don't like a review, it's certainly your (or anyone else's) prerogative. It just burns my cookies to read things like, "You sort of missed the point of the movie" or "It's not high art." That's taking a step beyond "I disagree, because...." and implying, "I know better than you!" or "How dare you not love a summer blockbuster/musical/insert genre here, they're exempt from scathing bitchery because they're supposed to be mindless, fun, etc, don't cha know? Besides, I liked it, so what's wrong with you?" Which may or may not be valid points, but at least have the courtesy of linking your review of perfection, fun, and completely unbiased opinion (if such a thing exists) in the midst of the patronizing diatribe, so that we, as readers, can see how much more effective a reviewer you (general you, not specific) are.

Also, from an utterly biased POV, Ranylt is awesome, so I have to have her back. Yes, I realize that she is a fully functioning (hopefully?) adult and can take care of herself. Nevertheless, rants like these ensue.

Posted by: Daphne at July 23, 2007 11:22 PM

I'm a total pacifist/wimp, so I don't tend to engage in the back and forth ranting that I've seen here before (at least for the review of Captivity). But it's not me wimping out when I say: ok. I get your point. It's pretty pretentious to tell a reviewer they "missed the point" of a movie.

All the same, I stand by my previous comments. This movie, and any movie, should not be judged based on pre-existing biases against (or for) John Travolta. That's just not fair to the hundreds of other people who put a lot of hard work into this film.

Posted by: Hannah at July 24, 2007 2:55 AM

I fucking hate, loath, and detest Ben Stiller. The sight of that dweebsucker makes me want gouge my eyes out.

Non sequitur, you say? No, merely taking the previous point to an extreme. It would be of no value to anyone for me to review a (*$#*$#@*$!!!!) Ben Stiller movie. So the question is "how biased is too biased?" As someone who has a high tolerance for even the most caricatured of actors (e.g., Nicholson today), I do think this reviewer's feelings about Travolta detract modestly from the review.

Posted by: Denadn at July 24, 2007 7:54 PM

Apparently, John Travolta missed the memo that Edna Turnblad was an obese housewife and instead channeled a retarded mid-western Captain Jack Sparrow when he spoke any line in the film. Insufferable unless he was dancing.

Seriously, I thought I was the only one who noticed this. My companions at the screening saw the Broadway show and absolutely loved Travolta. I tried to point out that the wonderfulness that was Devine was her masculine feminity, something that I'm sure Fierstein also expressed with his deep, raspy voice. And why was he cross-eyed. (Production note: if you are going to dress a man in drag and have him dance, make sure his boobs bounce in time with the music.)

Otherwise, I found Hairspray fun, entertaining, and highly enjoyable. It was nice to see the many cameos of original cast members (Mink Stole and Motormouth Maybelle to name a few) as well as John Waters.

Posted by: ciji at July 25, 2007 3:25 AM

I loved it! I thought Nicki Blonsky was a more fun Tracy than Ricki Lake. I also thought Travolta was kind of touching in the role of Edna, he's less of a drag queen, but still a better actor than Divine.

Anyway, if you like musicals you can't go wrong with this one. Sure it's a fantasy, that's what makes it so joyous! It's not suppose to be taken seriously as a statement about segration, it's just a happy, fun musical, and I really loved Blonsky's performance (although I'm not really looking forward to her post-Hairspray career as the ugly best friend who gets killed by the serial killer)!

Posted by: Rose at July 25, 2007 5:41 PM

the original Motormouth Maybelle was played by the late Ruth Brown. I don't think she made a cameo.

Posted by: tuscadero at July 26, 2007 6:48 AM

"A movie review should be like a good editorial. UNBIASED! The reviewer should review the movie on its own merits and leave their personal preferences out of the story."

Really? That sounds awfully boring to me, as well as impractical, nonsensical and pointless.

I have not seen the movie yet, but I will because I am a singin' and dancin' fool.

Posted by: Fabiola Thing at July 26, 2007 12:31 PM

Nicki Blonsky, you are a really good actress and I think that you should get a grammy for your performance in Hairspray!!! Same with you John Travolta.

Posted by: shannon at July 27, 2007 7:52 PM

Nicki Blonsky, you are a really good actress and I think that you should get a grammy for your performance in Hairspray!!! Same with you John Travolta.

Posted by: shannon at July 27, 2007 7:53 PM

I had no desire to see this movie and John Travolta looked awful in the trailers...BUT, I ended up loving both the movie and Travolta. If you look and listen closely you'll see some John Waters type elements in the film and in some of the lyrics of the songs. Especially in the Good Morning Baltimore song where Tracey feeds the rats like pets and ends up riding on a trash truck while belting out the song. I found that very twisted like a Waters film. When I listened to the soundtrack after seeing the film I heard lots of satire in some of the song lyrics that I missed while watching the film. After a few minutes into the film I actually forgot Travolta wasn't a real woman and I found all the performances from both teens and adults wonderful. I was put into a good mood after viewing this film. If you have any problems with musicals then don't go, but if you like them then you will love "Hairspray". Check out RottenTomatoes.com , the film almost got 100% good reviews.

Posted by: NoVaDJ at July 29, 2007 9:09 PM

i seriously think that hairspray is one of the most amazing movies i have ever seen. the cast is perfect just for the fact that is literally an all star film. the songs are happy fun to sing to, the characters are all different and great for different reasons, and the message is positive. i think this is seriously the best movie ive seen since grease.

Posted by: megan at July 30, 2007 11:59 AM

I love the original Hairspray, I HATED the musical, and I love this new Hairspray.
Favorite quote from the movie:

"You two better brace yourselves for a whole lot of ugly coming from a parade full of STUPID!"

-MotorMouth Maybelle on learning of SeaWeed and Penny's inter-racial romance.

Posted by: Leon at July 31, 2007 12:40 PM

I find it sadly ironic that even though Tracy Turnblad finds acceptance over the course of the film Nikki Blonsky fails to find it IRL.

Every commercial I've seen for this movie touts Travolta, Walken, Queen Latiffa... Even freaking Amanda Bynes gets higher billing than the lovely and talented young lady WHO PLAYS THE MAIN CHARACTER!!! AAAAAAAARGH!!!!!

Posted by: Stussyman at August 6, 2007 11:31 AM

I really enjoyed this movie. I had a smile on my face for pretty much the entire movie. What is the harm in that? People pay lots more than $10 to smile for two hours.


If you are a perpetual grouch, go watch "The Departed" again. If you just want to feel good for a little while, then go see Hairspray. It's truly good, clean fun! (And I'm not even a red state conservative.)

Posted by: suzeeet at August 7, 2007 12:31 AM

I'm a big fan of the original Hairspray, and I have to admit that I did enjoy the Broadway-style re-lease.
For all the sugary sweetness, it really was a well done movie - quite a bit better than all the dreck that the studios have been releasing lately.
Not only did I like it, but my hubby thoroughly enjoyed it, and he usually doesn't take a liking to movies like this.
Nikki Blonsky was just too adorable for words, and I hope to see her in some more stuff.


The only thing that I found to be really "jarring" about the movie is seeing Travolta in drag, and it's pretty much a GIVEN that he is NO Divine - not even close. I do think he did a halfway decent job, although I do think that it translated a little bit that he probably felt a little bit awkward in this getup. I imagine that anyone would.


Regardless though, the original was, and will always be the best. I would suggest that anyone new to Hairspray the Remake should at least view the original with Ricki Lake.

Posted by: KittenGoesAwoL at August 13, 2007 12:00 PM

I am still quite young, and i remember watching Hairspray as a little girl. although at the time i didnt understand much of it, i loved that movie to death, and i remember thinking that i loved Divine's eyebrows. Eyebrows aside, i wasnt even aware that there was a Hairspray musical on Broadway (i live in australia, guys) and i thought that this plastic movie would be a disgrace to the original.
if anyone reading this reads Dlisted (www.dlisted.com), Michael K describes hairspray perfectly *and im paraphrasing*:
"Hairspray was a beautiful black rose and now Hollywood has ruined it by covering it with glitter and rhinestones"

Posted by: ruby at August 14, 2007 9:43 AM

They were kind of lax on attitudes towards historical accuracy, but that's probably because musicals are camp anyway, with people breaking out in song and dance all the time. The buildings on that street in the opening ("Good Morning Baltimore") looked very old, as in the way they look in 2007 but just amended with 1962 signage, meaning it looked like this film was shot on location. Then when Michelle Pfeiffer threatens to fire a TV director, she says, "Baltimore is a small market. There's not many stations here." Well, in 1962 I don't think there were many stations anywhere. Three at most, I would guess - affiliates of CBS, NBC, and ABC, and that's it. Were independent stations around then? I kind of think independent stations didn't start until the 1970s. Correct me if I'm wrong. If I'm not, then her comment's context is all wrong. And Nikki Blonsky at the end coming out with a current highlighted hairstyle was just stupid. Her outfit was clever, as it was a "swinging '60s" outfit that would have been cutting edge as early as 1962, if an outfit like that was around at all. I normally equate an outfit like that with the mid-sixties, or at least post-Beatles invasion. Brittany Snow was back in familiar '60s territory, after playing a girl dancing on American Bandstand in 1964 in NBC's American Dreams. Unlike that show, in Hairspray, Snow (as a villian this time) actually had to don a '60s hairstyle. Her hair on American Dreams wasn't as outlandishly out of place as my describing of Blonsky above but I was always curious about Dreams' producers letting her keep that style - her real life hairstyle - on a show that, as a drama, otherwise got the historical accuracy aspect down to a tee. This was the second time I saw something like this. Gail O'Grady played Brittany Snow's mother on Dreams, and when Grady showed up on Hidden Palms this summer, on an early episode the parents attended a '60s party where they had to dress up like the '60s! So Grady was back in familiar American Dreams territory, too!

Posted by: Beau Hajavitch at August 20, 2007 4:04 AM

With todays explosive growth of childhood obesity this film should do well at the box office. It portrays obesity as a "good" thing, rather than to try to keep your body trim and fit.

Another movie where James Brown sings "Shout it loud, I'm black and I'm proud" while I sing "Shout it lame, I'm white and I'm ashamed."

It's about time the white put-downs are over.

Posted by: Martn at August 20, 2007 3:07 PM

Posted by: KittenGoesAwoL at August 13, 2007 12:00 PM
-------------

bull, i liked the original just fine...however...i saw the 2007 version and it quickly became my fav over the original. i just thought the original was not all that great.

Posted by: Naomi at January 8, 2008 12:14 AM

It's about time the white put-downs are over.

Posted by: Martn at August 20, 2007 3:07 PM
--------------------------------------------------------

yes, you poor white people, so oppressed. ignore the bad history, we've had enough with facing it!!

lol

Posted by: Naomi at January 8, 2008 12:15 AM

I really don't get why EVERYONE was making such a big deal out of John Travolta playing Edna...he's just another actor doing his job by playing a character. I actually enjoyed his more realistic and sympathetic take on Edna and the fact that he played a woman, not a man in a woman suit.

Also, I feel obliged to ask why the song "I Know Where I've Been" didn't make enough of an impression on you to even warrant a mention in your review? I thought that scene was one of the film's crowning achievements.

Posted by: Josh at January 10, 2008 12:03 AM





Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.