free counter with statistics Gridiron Gang | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

gridiron.jpg
Making the Formula Work Again

Gridiron Gang / Phillip Stephens

Film Reviews | September 16, 2006 | Comments (23)


Having grown up in a central hub of the Bible Belt, I feel like I understand to some degree the grassroots cultural obsession with high school football. Never particularly athletic myself, it was easy to fall into the frame of mind that was highly critical of the fervor surrounding the sport, especially when our school district could manage to fund seven coaches and a (fucking) athletic museum for a cadre of numbskulls who had little or no scholastic intentions and couldn’t win five games in a season.

Upon reflection, however, this hellbent youthful iconoclasm was probably just part and parcel of growing up and is heavily tempered by the realization that, for many of those people, football was all they had. Perhaps the coaches who screamed and tore at their hair, the fans who wept and cursed, and the players who concussed one another and vomited in the summer heat just understood that this was the best thing they could do when the rest of their lives didn’t offer much else. Maybe they poured their energies and egos into football because they knew outside of that, all they had to look forward to was a lifetime as a used car salesman or ticket-taker, probably mere blocks away from the same field of their glory days.

I guess my point in bringing this up is that Gridiron Gang, an otherwise by-the-numbers sports film, was actually quite good at elucidating what a positive role football can have, though in a much more literal way than the typical high school experience. For the real-life inmates of the Kilpatrick correctional institution and their cinematic equivalents, the game of football is both a utility to destroy their violent affiliations with gangs and a metaphor for the redemption of their lives. It’s a familiar story that uses the old sport-as-salvation modus painted in the overly operatic and cloying tones we’re used to, but Gridiron manages to put its dramatic qualities to good use and maintain a verity of presentation that makes it better than average.

As were Remember the Titans, Friday Night Lights, and more recently, Invincible, this football flick is based on a true story, though with dramatic embellishments tossed around, and was already filmed as a documentary of the same name by Lee Stanley in 1993. The story concerns juvenile correction officer Sean Porter (The Rock), who comes to the grim realization that juvenile corrections itself is worthless when 75 percent of the inmates end up right back in jail. Porter endeavors, with the requisite bit of bureaucratic wrangling and skepticism, to start a football team that he hopes will rejuvenate the inmates’ self-esteem and put their lives to right. Those he selects for the team are the predictably spunky misfits united by a criminal past but otherwise showing no predilection for either football or working with one another.

Gridiron as a sports film is the exact song and dance viewers will be expecting it to be, with all its quirky personalities, inspirational speeches, operatic score, and disappointments before that final crescendo to victory, but the cast kept me suitably distracted from the platitudes in the writing. For one, most of the film’s youths are unknowns, and they all look and portray the parts of the troubled and incarcerated to surprising success. Secondly, while The Rock and Xzibit aren’t as much thespians as they are forces of personality, they fit their roles as tough-but-nurturing counselors to a T — especially The Rock, whose physical presence and furious demeanor make him more convincing as a coach than any action hero.

The believable cast anchors the story and makes it endearing, for all its clichés. Director Phil Joanou also presents footage of the ‘93 documentary during the credits, so we can see that many of the seemingly melodramatic scenes in the film were actually based in real situations and dialogue. This bonus material managed to undermine my cynical assumptions that the film had no substantial goals beyond providing the predictable and sensational distraction characteristic of most sports films. At least this time the filmmakers seemed to have a point — in one of the movie’s final scenes, Coach Porter chides one of his players: “It’s only a game,” as if also to remind the audience that football isn’t the inherent point here, but the meaning it gives to those playing it. I wish more movies like this did the same.

Phillip Stephens is the lead critic for Pajiba. He lives in Fayetteville, AR.


Last Kiss, The | Fearless



Comments

Pity -- regardless of its merits, I would NEVER see this in a theatre, precisely because I'm so fucking tired of the formula. Well executed or not, there is something incredibly enervating about watching the same formula played out (no pun intended) time and again in this particular genre.

Can't remember the title at the moment, but that Samuel L. Jackson pic wherein he coaches an inner city basketball team pleased me no end precisely because the ending was NOT predictable. Nor, for that matter, was much else about the film, other than the inevitable heartwarmingness of it all.

And The ROCK??? Forgive me, but the day I pay good money to see a film he headlines is the day Kirsten Dunst, Katie Holmes or Kate Bosworth win a Best Actress Oscar.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at September 15, 2006 8:13 PM

hey now, dont bash all that hard on the rock, i thought he did well in the rundown (a movie i liked, personally...fault me if you want to). i wont see this in theaters either, maybe a rental on some distant friday night, beer and pizza in hand and couch cushions fluffed. but it's good to know that it wasnt as bad as i thought it was going to be.

Posted by: razh at September 15, 2006 8:19 PM

"Can you SMEEEEEEEEELLLLLL what the Rock...is cooking?" *arches eyebrow*

What else can I say, other than no, I will not see this in the theater (nor in a box, with a cat named Socks, or with a fox who happens to have a bag of rocks). However, I will be popping this one into the old Apex and viewing again and again. What can I say, I love me some football and most football movies (although, Adam Sandler will never, ever, again see play in my DVD collection!! Especially after that blasphemous remake of a classic.).

Posted by: ScarletKnight at September 15, 2006 8:40 PM

Being from the South myself, and having witnessed and participated in the madness that is high school football, there is one thing I HAVE to know before I'll pay to see this one. Does the Rock take off his shirt?

Posted by: Wendy at September 16, 2006 3:44 AM

I haven't seen this, Wendy, but he has to. I mean, what kind of world would we live in if there was a movie where The Rock DIDN'T take off his shirt?

Posted by: Daphne at September 16, 2006 10:06 AM

I, too, like the Rock, and think The Rundown is the best hangover film of all time. I'll probably see this on DVD if my liking of the Rock can outweigh my dislike of sports movies.

And he's got to take off his shirt. I think Daphne's right. He just has to.

Posted by: Jessica at September 16, 2006 4:37 PM

The Rock DOES NOT take off his shirt ladies, sorry.

Posted by: Silver at September 16, 2006 5:09 PM

Damn it! Damn it all to heck! Yes, melodramatic I know, considering I had no intention of actually going to see this in the theatre. But any desire to actually consider possibly thinking of renting this on DVD is greatly diminished.

Posted by: Daphne at September 16, 2006 5:39 PM

I have always thought he was the best wrestler in that farcical sport they call WWF. I couln't stand to see the natterings and poseur attitutudes... so much like daytime soap operas. A lot of hype and drama and head bashings that don't lead to nerve damage or broken bones. *sigh* Atleast football I somewhat understand the showmanship, but WWF is a mystery to me. (Sorry to digress)

Back to the film, I wouldn't mind watching this in screen when it's in half-price. Maybe in 6-8 months...most likely will see this in DVD.

Posted by: carrie at September 17, 2006 2:17 AM

sweet jesus this movie is the worst walking cliche of a movie EVER. in all the previews, every word out of every character's mouths is from a previous movie. FUCK am i the only one that sees how ridiculously unoriginal this is? another formulaic pile of shit that way too many people stepped right into.

Posted by: Jim at September 17, 2006 11:15 PM

I liked this movie better when it was called "The Longest Yard." And I mean the original version, not that piece of crap Adam Sandler/Chris Rock remake-a-thon.

Posted by: Steve at September 18, 2006 12:37 AM

You know what The Rock plays really well? A gay guy. If any of you saw the SNL skit I'm talking about, I think you'll agree. And that man can sing (kind of) I mean, he's not a thespian or anything, but he certainly doesn't take himself at all seriously and that is a huge plus in my book.

I was never going to see this movie, in theaters or out, but it's nice to know it's not a total waste of space.

Posted by: Malice Alice at September 18, 2006 3:42 AM

Got to give Rocky some credit here. I mean, the guy played Division I football , so he doesn't have to stretch much to "act" like a coach, which the reviewer pointed out in his article. Seriously, think of any other "action hero" around today cast in this part, and you relaize how quickly the movie would have been a total disaster (Jackie Chan, anyone?) It's nice to see a guy know his limits as an actor sometimes, and go with his strong points.

Posted by: jason at September 18, 2006 9:30 AM

Congratulations, Jason -- you've just won the Backhanded Compliment of the Millenium Award!

(And, for the record, I agree -- the Rock does indeed make a better football coach than Jackie Chan would have.)

Posted by: sansho1 at September 18, 2006 10:04 AM

I liked The Rundown as well. It's not gonna win any awards, but it was certainly fun. And sometimes, fun is all I need to kill a Sunday afternoon. And the Rock was pretty good in Be Cool - him and Andre Benjamin were the ONLY decent things in that crapfest.

The thing is, this guy has serious potential - he's huge, tough, has a ton of charisma and is actually a decent actor - with limits (as jason said). He actually has the potential to be a phenomenal action movie star - he's built like the governator, only taller and better looking, with more appeal than any of his lunkhead predecessors. He needs to choose better movies though - this looks passable (I'll watch it because I like Dwayne and I love football, and dammit, sometimes I'm a sucker for triumph-of-the-human-spirit shit), but Doom? Walking Tall? Egads, man, be a bit more selective, and you could be a superstar!

Aaaaand... I just wrote two paragraphs supporting a guy named "The Rock". I'll be sending back my Pajiba t-shirt and membership card. Perhaps I'll head over to the Last Kiss and bitch about Zach Braff - maybe that'll restore my cred.

Posted by: TK at September 18, 2006 12:19 PM

I have to admit i will end up seeing this, likely as soon as it hits DVD. What's wrong with the whole feel-good march-to-the-finish of the typical sports film? Isn't the whole point just to enjoy it for what it is? Was this supposed to be the next Kane? NO. Is the Rock expected to make PERFECT movies every time out? NO. Every good actor has had the FORMULA movie. Action stars just have more of them. Then they make the transition to more serious fare.

Am I the only one who heard rumblings of a King Kamayha-mayha (sp?) biopic starring the Rock? i swear I heard something about it a year or so ago and admittedly got excited since it seems like a perfect transitional piece. Tongan roots...the BAD ASS!!! true tribal tattoo he has...seems like a natural fit and this dude, while yes a wrestler, is the ONLY athlete (if you think these guys aren't athletes then shame on your because they WORK) to make a genuine swap into acting. Brian Bosworth? Hulk Hogan?(sure hogan did a lot but c'mon...3 ninjas knuckle up??!! Mr. Nanny??!!) Howie Long? This one's the only one who shows promise.

Posted by: JohnyCorpseF*cker at September 18, 2006 1:19 PM

and i got way off the point...but in a nutshell...The Rock is more talented than a lot of the people who seem to have something coming out every 4 months and I'd pay to see him do some more serious stuff and this seems like it may be a step in the right direction.

Posted by: JohnyCorpseF*cker at September 18, 2006 1:22 PM

Someone had to mention "Be Cool"...

There is nothing redeeming in that movie. I dont know if I was linked the article from here or another site, but recently I read about how satire is getting harder and harder as celebrities go more over the top then any fiction. Thats exactly what happend with be cool, the only way that movie could have been funny if it was a stoner comedy about the poeple that made/wrote it. Unfourtunatly those poeple exist in real life, which is just depressing.

I know that was off topic but its the second time "be cool" has up in the last week..... man i hate that movie

Posted by: Matt at September 18, 2006 4:30 PM

I think the Samuel L. Jackson movie was called Coach Carter.

Posted by: M at September 18, 2006 4:47 PM

Actually, Matt, Be Cool the novel is excellent. And totally different (suprised? Hollywood wasn't faithful to source material? I know, I was shocked too.)

But part of what makes it work is that there is no famous face to associate with the characters in the book. Of course, the other part that works is that it's a kick-ass book. Give it a whirl, I'd be curious about your take on it.

That said, I did think that Andre was funny, and I liked seeing the Rock do something a little different. But you are correct - when an ex-pro-wrestler and a hip-hop performer are the best actors in a movie... that's not a good sign.

Posted by: TK at September 18, 2006 4:57 PM

My fondness for this formula started with Bad News Bears some time in the early 80s (when I first saw it at the dawning of its continuing HBO run), and it has not abated yet.

I won't see this in the theatres, because frankly, there's little chance it's good enough to warrant my $10 (nothing lately has been, save Cinderella Man, which was a wonderful - albeit also formulaic - surprise when I picked it up on DVD), but I'll rent it. Probably the day it comes out.

I don't understand why, but I'm a sucker for every "underdog does good" sports movie ever made. I know how they're going to start, how they're going to end, and all the dialogue in between, but still I enjoy them. It's truly baffling. Made more so by the fact that I am not at all into sports.

Also, I *loved* Friday Night Lights. LOVED it.

Posted by: S. at September 21, 2006 4:58 PM

I just realized that my favorite recent movie is ALSO an underdog sports movie! Ha!

Told you. It's a disease. :(

Posted by: S. at September 21, 2006 4:59 PM

"It's nice to see a guy know his limits as an actor sometimes, and go with his strong points."

I couldn't agree more - I don't think that's a back-handed compliment at all. Not everybody can be a brilliant actor, but there's plenty of room for middling actors. I have such respect for anybody who repeatedly plays a certain type, does it well, and doesn't profess to be doing anything more than that. There's something emotionally healthy about it to me. The Rock is no fool - he's really good in a certain capacity and has survived genre-switching pretty well.

I also saw a very funny snippet of him when he was asked on the red carpet which secret power he'd want. Without missing a beat he said "flight" and proceeded to explain why very lucidly. It was hysterical.

Posted by: Samantha T at September 24, 2006 1:26 PM