free counter with statistics Gracie | Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

goody2shoesab.jpg

Goody, Two Shues.

Gracie / Agent Bedhead

Film Reviews | June 1, 2007 | Comments (26)


Gracie is one of those “inspired by true events” films where writers are allowed encouraged ordered to take creative liberties by basically pulling crap out of their asses to make a more engaging and marketable film. Unfortunately, the writers of Gracie, either by direction or during a moment of conscience, molded the film into the predictable formula often employed for sports films. The result may not be realistic, but it is a very hurl-inducing and protracted ninety-five minutes produced, directed, and (to a large degree) acted out by the Shue family. Production was done by John Shue, along with siblings Elisabeth and Andrew, and the latter two appear in the movie, which is directed by Elisabeth’s husband, Davis Guggenheim. If you haven’t guessed, this is a rather incestuous affair.

The film is set up so that anyone who might criticize its apparent goals will immediately be deemed heartless. The story unfolds in South Orange, New Jersey in 1978, after Title IX had been legislated but before its impact was widespread. Young Gracie (Carly Schroeder) is a headstrong and feminist athlete whose soccer-playing stud of an older brother, Johnny (Jesse Lee Sofer), is killed in a car accident after a game. After Gracie decides to take Johnny’s place on the team, she must first convince pretty much all of humanity to allow her to play on the all-boys team (everyone from her parents to the school board of course thinks that a girl isn’t meant for soccer, unless her name is Beckham). Thematically, Title IX really just functions as an afterthought to loosely tie this storyline together. This isn’t a movie that spreads out the history and mission of gender equality — it just latches onto an overdone premise and uses it to advance the Shue family’s agenda. And, of course, the concept of “Girl Power” runs though our athletic departments and pop music heavy-rotation lists already. Men everywhere are now scared out of their wits to give a congratulatory backslap to female colleagues for fear of being sued for sexual harassment (or, worse yet, being zig-a-zig-ahed). This is shit we know already, without this film stuffing it down our throats.

Yet stuff it down our throats this film does, and we must suffer through the story as our heroine suffers. Poor Gracie gets knocked down for a few months by parents who refuse to let her play varsity soccer. She sulks through this requisite timeframe by engaging in a rousing game of juvenile delinquency. She smokes. She steals. She cheats. She flunks history class. The horror of it all! And she makes out with college boys until her father (Dermot Mulroney) uses his apparent Jedi powers to locate the family car on a beach, thereby disclosing a half-naked coed writhing atop his daughter. Only then does he decide that perhaps a girl on the varsity soccer team ain’t such a bad idea after all, and he goes so far as to quit his job so he can coach her to varsity level. This puts financial pressure on the family’s blue-collar lifestyle, which is a measure of sympathy written into the film in lieu of the rather affluent Shue family’s financial reality.

In fact, most of the significant aspects of this story are largely contrived. Although the film is dedicated to the memory of William Shue, who was the inspiration for the Johnny character, the movie’s character is made so much more tragic than is necessary. For example, when Johnny screws up what could have been the winning kick against their rival team, he falls dramatically onto the field in shame and disbelief … and then he promptly dies in a car wreck, no questions asked. While William Shue indeed was the captain of a high school soccer team that captured the New Jersey 1978 state championship trophy, he did not die in such a dramatic manner. He met his demise a decade later from injuries sustained in a tree-climbing accident. Likewise, Elisabeth Shue didn’t even play soccer in high school — she quit after her junior-high years (presumably to pursue certain adventures in babysitting). Gracie, however, continues to play soccer, complete with endless training sequences set to Bruce Springsteen tunes and a highly predictable ending.

Working with the assumption that most of the characters in Gracie are inspired by real people, boy howdy, did Elisabeth Shue hate her mother. Elisabeth portrays mother Lindsay Bowen as if Shue couldn’t stand the bitch, announcing every discouraging sentiment out of Bowen’s mouth in a sing-song voice. She tells Gracie soccer is out of the realm of possibility because “not everything is possible,” and “life is like a shit sandwich, and us girls all get to take a big bite.” While Gracie’s father coaches her through soccer drills and countless sets of pull-ups, mother Elisabeth appears on the porch for the sole purpose of cheerily announcing, “I think it’s too much for her,” before disappearing into the ether.

Andrew Shue, meanwhile, takes up the very minor role of Assistant Coach Owen Clark, who is rather easy to confuse with Dermot Mulroney’s character. The striking physical similarities might be due to the Shue family’s ability to assimilate others for their cause, or perhaps the film’s makeup artist just really rocked the mascara wand. Mulroney comes off rather well as the angry, grieving father who slowly accepts his daughter’s athletic potential. Andrew Shue, however, does little but excel at glowering at the camera. His few lines are uttered in the same manner he employed on Melrose Place, and mostly, he just stands around with a very intense look on his face, perhaps wondering where the hell Heather Locklear is. Meanwhile, while the characters of Gracie and Johnny work well enough, their level of affection is exaggerated due to the short amount of time Johnny is actually alive during the story. The resulting vibe is reminiscent of Angelina Jolie and James Haven on the red carpet, so there is an unintentional tone of relief when Johnny bites it and ends up in his early grave because, otherwise, this film could have turned into Flowers In The Attic.

Ultimately, Gracie is a rather irrelevant movie that functions as little more than Elizabeth Shue’s way of recreating her own history, romanticizing her eldest brother’s death, and stamping her family’s legacy into the minds of future impressionable young female soccer players. When Gracie meets the celluloid screen, the phrase “loosely based” can be translated into “what Elisabeth Shue wished she would have accomplished as a teenager.” Which means that the film’s message isn’t really to stand tough and fight for your right to jockey. Rather, it’s more like this — Girls, it’s okay to screw around and choose not to follow your dreams because, someday, you can pursue you right to recreate your personal history. But make sure you remember to marry a successful film director who will indulge these whims.

Girl power!

Agent Bedhead lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma and tries to avoid reality at all costs. She also insults pop culture daily at agentbedhead.com.


Movies that Feel Like Life | Mr. Brooks



Comments

Goody, Two Shues.

Hee!

Posted by: Ranylt at June 2, 2007 4:30 PM

No offense to Agent Bedhead but the plot of this movie is having the same effect on me as the title of the review for Mr. Brooks so I think I'm gonna leave.

Posted by: Candy at June 2, 2007 5:30 PM

While I knew this movie would be a load of crap...I was at leaast hoping I could take my 10yr old daughter and a few friends. I can sit/sleep through pretty much anything (Shrek the Third).

But with the writhing co-ed, smoking, and "shit-sandwich" I am guessing that's a no.

Maybe I'll take them to see Knocked Up. Probably a better lesson learned there!

Posted by: wsapnin at June 2, 2007 5:57 PM

I have absolutely no interest in this film. Just wanted to say that Elisabeth was da'bomb in Adventures in Babysitting yo'.

Now, not so much.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at June 2, 2007 6:49 PM

Just a nitpicky thing...

I think it was Title VII of the Civil Rights act that included mentions of equal rights for women, not IV.

Posted by: Kate at June 2, 2007 8:00 PM

It was Title IX.

Posted by: sam at June 2, 2007 8:27 PM

I wasn't going to comment, because I don't care about this movie, but, Kate, just so's ya know...

Title IX pertains to sex and education, was passed in 1972, and states:
"No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance" and it typically is applied to school sports.

And, Bedhead, it is only in the movies that men are scared out of their wits of sexual harrassment lawsuits. In the real world, not so much. Have you ever had a (non-web-based) job?

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt --maybe watching this shitty movie made you stupid.

I wasn't going to reply, because I personally don't care much about you, but just for the benefit of the other readers, yes, I have worked extensively in the so-called real world. Thanks for asking. - AB

Posted by: Tracy at June 2, 2007 8:29 PM

And, Bedhead, it is only in the movies that men are scared out of their wits of sexual harrassment lawsuits. Have you ever had a (non-web-based) job?

And just where the hell do you work? Get another job, stat.

Posted by: Jerce at June 3, 2007 8:53 AM

Once upon a time, when someone might have given a rat's ass about him, I saw Andrew Shue on some late night show. He told an incredibly dull story.... about soccer. Apparently he went someplace in Africa to play, and was the only white boy on the team. They did some tribal ceremony, where he was the...ahem... least-well equipped player.

It was even more boring than you think.

Oh, Elizabeth... you should have married me. Maybe it was just a phase you went through, but I'd have been okay with you having half-naked coeds writhing atop you. Assuming that scene was autobiographical too, and not just a nod to equality for Title Roman Numeral Whatever It Was.

So in conclusion, we can perhaps state that people in the Shue's white, upper-middle class neighborhood liked soccer. Except Mommy, who apparently was too busy doing other things to be a soccer mom, or even encourage her kids.

Posted by: Rob at June 3, 2007 9:43 AM

Great review, AB. When I first read about this project (on a trade round-up here, as it happens), it seemed majorly self-absorbed on the part of the Shues. Mockworthy, indeed, regardless of the subject matter. Put your personal life out there in a ridiculous way, and ridicule you shall receive.

To the other point: Men (and women) in the real world do (and should) think seriously about the possibility of sexual harassment claims against them. Investigating those claims is closely related to the work I do, and let me assure you that virtually every significant employer, web-based or not, spends large amounts of money to police the environment for this conduct and defend claims based on it. The men take it seriously or find out the hard way that they should have.

Tracy, at first you actually seemed to know a little something about gender-equality law, but demonstrating a jackass-level comprehension of a longstanding, nationwide workplace problem undermined you. Calling the reviewer "stupid," from an absolutely unjustified and unmerited platform of condescension, just made you an asshole.

AB, best not to feed the bears as you're driving through the park. It only encourages them to attack the other cars.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at June 3, 2007 2:06 PM

First, that is a f*ed up title. Not as bad as "When the Other Shue Dropped", but still pretty funny.

Second, thank you socalledonlycousins, for so clearly expressing what I was about to. Now I can save space and make fun of this movie.

Third, AB, you are truly proving your mettle here on the site. This review was excellent. And the jabs, particularly the "Elisabeth portrays mother Lindsay Bowen as if Shue couldn't stand the bitch" and the comparing of the siblings closeness to Jolie and Haven, were dynamite. There are pieces of fried shrimp that I must clean off my screen, I laughed so hard.

Fourth, you don't think that closeness was real, do you? That that whole family had some sort of weird Greek-tragedy-turned-Freudian-complex thing going on do you? Now I feel squicky.

Posted by: Vermillion at June 3, 2007 7:29 PM

I think what Tracy was trying to say is that there appears to be a perception that women regularly accuse men of sexual harrassment in the workplace for looking at them funny, or as a way to manipulate office politics.

While perhaps those things do occur, I would imagine that generally complaints arise from genuine grievances (whether the men involved meant it maliciously or not is another issue), and the perpetuation of the myth that women are "false accusers" is really doing them a disservice and undermining the complaints of those who really have been sexually harrassed. We've only just got over that mentality in the legal system, which not long ago used to require that judges give the jury a warning about children and women who've been sexually assaulted being "unreliable" witnesses.

As someone who's been on the receiving end of harrassment, I can't imagine a more dangerous and counterproductive stereotype than the hysterical, vindictive office bitch who wants to screw men over... just as damaging as the idea that all men are potential harrassers, I would imagine.

However, I don't think A.B. was really making a serious comment on the issue - so perhaps Tracy got a little bit too het up over it - but her point remains valid.

Posted by: L2 at June 3, 2007 10:05 PM

Wasn't this movie already reviewed? I think it was done by dan who was trying to think of a pun and then he thought of "The Other Shue". Are we doing double reviews now?

Posted by: Mehdi Hasan Sheikh at June 4, 2007 1:28 AM

Agent B, thanks for getting me through Monday morning without repeated head-thumping-against-desk incidents...

Posted by: cinekat at June 4, 2007 6:18 AM

His few lines are uttered in the same manner he employed on Melrose Place, and mostly, he just stands around with a very intense look on his face, perhaps wondering where the hell Heather Locklear is.

Snerk! Don't you mean Alissssson? God I fucking hated Billy. My dog has a better range of facial expressions.

Posted by: litelysalted at June 4, 2007 8:22 AM

now *that* was a scathing review for bitchy people. Welcome back Pajiba!

Huzzah!!

Posted by: Stella at June 4, 2007 9:02 AM

*My dog has a better range of facial expressions.*

... and at this point, just as much of a career. (Ba-bing!)

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at June 4, 2007 10:51 AM

Wait- was the "half-naked coed" a guy?

I can't be only person who has been brainwashed into automatically assuming that when the term "coed" is used, the user usually means "large-breasted, vacuous nympho?" Or, more specifically, "soon-to-be-boned-and/or-slashed, large-breasted, vacuous nympho?"
Because if that is the case here, that might make it worth sitting through this vomitous mess.

(Yes, I realize the term is technically gender-neutral and not inherently derogatory, but I have never actually seen it used otherwise- so am still picturing it as described above. Happy Monday to me!)

Posted by: Go Big Red at June 4, 2007 11:49 AM

Great review, Agent Bedhead! You've thoroughly cleansed any curiosity I had about this movie.

Posted by: bonnie at June 4, 2007 12:37 PM

Actually, coed is not technically gender-neutral - it specfically refers to a female student at a coeducational institution.

Posted by: pedant at June 4, 2007 7:35 PM

Agent Bedhead

I don't want to argue about the relative merits of this feel-good semi-autobiographical film. Film criticism is a subjective field and reviews can range from being completely uninformative reflections of a critic's biases to more useful a nd interesting historical and relative analysis of a film's direction, cinematography and acting.

Your review reads as a highly invective and personal rant against the Shue family -- or the members of which were invovled in this film. As someone who has actually met some of the Shues, seen the film, and who has also read better researched reviews on this film (not necessarily positive reviews either), I stongly suggest you do your homework before you make false statements based more on your biases or hunches. At the least, write a review that imparts some knowledge if not better udnerstanding of the relative merits of the film...not the people behind it (well, your personal view of the people behind it). There is nothing wrong with "scathing" reviews if they are well founded on facts, well-reasoned logic or substaniated with relevant comparisons. Yours seems scathing for the sake fo beign scathing...and most of the actual criticism is aimed at the Shues not the movie. You do blogging and your readers a disservice with such low-quality writing.

Posted by: Reader at June 7, 2007 5:16 PM

Agent Bedhead

I don't want to argue about the relative merits of this feel-good semi-autobiographical film. Film criticism is a subjective field and reviews can range from being completely uninformative reflections of a critic's biases to more useful a nd interesting historical and relative analysis of a film's direction, cinematography and acting.

Your review reads as a highly invective and personal rant against the Shue family -- or the members of which were involved in this film. As someone who has actually met some of the Shues, seen the film, and who has also read better researched reviews on this film (not necessarily positive reviews either), I stongly suggest you do your homework before you make false statements based more on your biases or hunches. At the least, write a review that imparts some knowledge if not better understanding of the relative merits of the film...not the people behind it (well, your personal view of the people behind it). There is nothing wrong with "scathing" reviews if they are well founded on facts, well-reasoned logic or substantiated with relevant comparisons. Yours seems scathing for the sake fo beign scathing...and most of the actual criticism is aimed at the Shues not the movie. You do blogging and your readers a disservice with such low-quality writing.

Posted by: Reader at June 7, 2007 5:20 PM

Agent Bedhead

I don't want to argue about the relative merits of this feel-good semi-autobiographical film. Film criticism is a subjective field and reviews can range from being completely uninformative reflections of a critic's biases to more useful and interesting historical and relative analysis of a film's direction, cinematography and acting.

Your review reads as a highly invective and personal rant against the Shue family -- or the members of which were involved in this film. As someone who has actually met some of the Shues, seen the film, and who has also read better researched reviews on this film (not necessarily positive reviews either), I strongly suggest you do your homework before you make false statements based more on your biases or hunches. At the least, write a review that imparts some knowledge if not better understanding of the relative merits of the film...not the people behind it (well, your personal view of the people behind it). There is nothing wrong with "scathing" reviews if they are well founded on facts, well-reasoned logic or substantiated with relevant comparisons. Yours seems scathing for the sake of beign scathing...and most of the actual criticism is aimed at the Shues not the movie. You do blogging and your readers a disservice with such low-quality writing.

Posted by: Reader at June 7, 2007 5:25 PM

Forgive me if someone's already pointed this out, but I will have to give a bit of credit to Andrew Shue. At least he played soccer. Professionally, even. (See MLS inaugural season, where he played for the Los Angeles Galaxy. Yep, I'm a soccer geek.) And he was pretty good.

'K. Done now. Resume blasting.

Posted by: nadha at June 8, 2007 10:21 AM

I loved the movie. So did my 11 year old daughter. Elisabeth Shue impressed me once again.

Posted by: Jason at June 13, 2007 6:58 PM

This movie was very inspiring!

Posted by: Briana at October 26, 2007 10:18 PM