pacinogf30sm.jpg

Resistance Is Futile

The Godfather / Agent Bedhead

Film Reviews | June 24, 2008 | Comments (71)


Based upon the bestselling novel by Mario Puzo, The Godfather (1972) is one of those rare film adaptations that perfectly captures every essential aspect of its source material. Directed by Francis Ford Coppola, who also co-wrote the screenplay with Puzo, The Godfather was the highest grossing film of the year, and it went on to receive ten nominations and three wins at the Academy Awards. This film, along with its two sequels, formed The Godfather Trilogy, which established Coppolla as a master director. Coppola was relatively young — his early 30s saw both Godfather I and II hit theaters — and he spent the remainder of his career attempting to live up to the cinematic standards and commercial success of his own creations. Perhaps the closest Coppola ever got to reaching some slight form of epic street cred again was with Bram Stoker’s Dracula, but even that paled in comparison to the incredible stature and achievement of The Godfather. It is similarly daunting to attempt to write a review of the film that many consider to be one of the greatest works of American cinema. Even without regard to the sequels, it’s still not possible to adequately do justice to all of the important aspects of The Godfather in this review’s context.

Upon its release, The Godfather quickly became the standard by which all gangster films are judged, and it deserves recognition as part of Pajiba Classic Week, but this review shall, inevitably, work an inevitable disservice in its scope. For instance, we could talk about the importance that Coppola placed upon atmosphere and mood or discuss the film’s cutting-edge cinematography or highly effective score. In the alternative, we could get slightly more academic and discuss the film’s operatic structure or its keen resemblance to Shakespeare’s King Lear. For a slightly frivolous turn, we could consider some of the symbolism involved in the film, such as the unsavory bedpartner that Hollywood producer Jack Woltz (John Marley) wakes up to when he refuses a favor to Don Vito or those citrusy angels of death otherwise known as oranges. Finally, we could bury ourselves within the countless sociological, economic, or ethical interpretations of The Godfather. The sheer volume of possibilities here are almost maddening, but the intricate richness of The Godfather is also the reason for its timeless endurance and almost universal appeal. It is a film capable of existing at so many different levels, and viewers can choose their complexity based on whether or not they wish to view it as pure entertainment, a statement upon society, or just as an example of great cinematic technique. Since I tend to be a total whore for wonderfully-drawn film characters, I find one of the most compelling aspects of The Godfather to be the story of Michael Corleone’s (Al Pacino) reluctant rise to power.

The Godfather is set in the latter part of 1940s in New York City, and is, nominally, a gangster epic about a turf war between five crime families. At its core, the film is an exploration of the corruption of power, in both the government and private sectors. Coppola tells the story of the Corleones, a crime family headed by Don Vito Corleone (Marlon Brando), and the troubled process by which power is passed onto the lower generation. Don Vito has raised three sons Sonny (James Caan), Fredo (John Cazale), and Michael (Al Pacino) as well as an adopted son, Tom Hagen (Robert Duvall), who acts as the family’s trusted consigliere and legal advisor. The Corleones are, at first glance, a very tight-knit family, but they are entirely unable to separate the notions of “family” and “business.” Religion also takes a backseat to the business practices that serve as the absolute morality for the Corleones. Business remains the unquestionable justification that drives members of one family to choose sides and become disloyal, and business also justifies the slaughter of such traitors. The unbreakable tenet, as Michael reminds Fredo, is this: “Don’t ever take sides with anyone against the family.”

Coppola opens the film at the wedding celebration of Don Vito’s only daughter, Connie (Talia Shire) and Carlo Rizzi (Gianni Russo). At this point, we are outsiders to the family and have much in common with Kay Adams (Diane Keaton), the WASP girlfriend of Michael. Kay is fascinated by the Corleones and their seemingly mythical power. Although she is shocked when the almost babyfaced Pacino relates the story about how Don Vito got his way with a music exec by “making him an offer he couldn’t refuse,” Kay is easily comforted when Michael assures her that he is not like his family. During the celebration, Don Vito carries out business in his darkened office. He grants favors to those who call him Godfather and promise a future service, and one such visitor asks Don Vito to provide justice where the court system has failed to punish his daughter’s rapists. Don Vito refuses payment for his service because, unlike politicians and law enforcement, the Godfather himself cannot be bought. Don Vito is also the only leader of the five families who resists the “dirty business” of drug trafficking introduced by rogue gangster, Sollozzo (Al Lettieri). This opposition results in an assassination attempt upon Don Vito, and, for the remainder of the film, Corleone brothers struggle to keep control of the situation.

Within Don Vito Corleone, Marlon Brando creates an iconic character that has endured as the subject of endless imitation and parody. Brando gives his usual impeccible performance with a voice modelled after gangster Frank Costello and subtle, purposefully understated body and hand gestures. Don Vito is a man of careful consideration, and, so, all of his actions carry particular significance. Quite simply, the man is so bloody intimidating that he never even has to raise his voice to get his point across. However, to be quite blunt, Brando could have done the part of Don Vito in his sleep. A larger challenge for Coppola, as a director, must have been to keep Pacino from making a tidy meal of the Sicilian scenery while demonstrating a deep intensity from within. Michael is the youngest son and a college-educated, highly decorated WWII veteran, who has always aimed to avoid the family business. We identify with his struggle to maintain his belief that that a life of violent crime is wrong, but we also empathize with Michael’s slow submission to the idea that his family’s acts are a necessary evil. This is a gradual transformation, achieved by Pacino’s masterful take on an excellent script, and Michael’s face slowly loses its humanity as he makes the voyage from relatively wide-eyed civilian to hardened leader of a mafia family.

One of many unforgettable scenes of the film occurs one evening when Michael visits Don Vito in the hospital, finds his father unprotected, and knows instantly that trouble is on the way. After Michael and a nurse move Don Vito down the hallway, Michael confronts a man looking for his father. It turns out to be Enzo, the baker, who feels endebted to the Corleones and insists on staying to help. Michael tells Enzo to wait outside and returns to his father’s bedside:

MICHAEL Just lie here, Pop. I’ll take care of you now. I’m with you now. I’m with you…

[Michael kisses the Don’s hand; the Don smiles, with a tear in his eye. Michael leaves to meet Enzo outside of the hospital.]

MICHAEL (grabbing and tossing the flowers that Enzo is still holding) Get rid of these. (then, as Michael turns Enzo’s collar up) Come ‘ere. Put your hand in your pocket like you have a gun. You’ll be alright. (then, after he sighs) You’ll be okay…

[A black sedan pulls up to the front of the hospital. The occupants look at Michael and Enzo, as Michael undoes a button of his coat and puts his hand in, as if he had a gun. The car then drives off.]

MICHAEL You did good.

Like most people, Enzo is pretty much scared shitless at this point and pulls out a cigarette, but his hands are shaking so violently that lighting up is an impossibility. Michael then takes the lighter, easily lights the cigarette, and, unavoidably, notices that his hands are as steady as they come. At that moment, Michael seems to realize that his life has irreversibly changed.

The notion of free will in The Godfather is a complex one, and a predominant issue is whether Michael ever truly has a choice but to eventually become the head of a violent crime family. Ideally, the eldest brother and heir apparent, Sonny, would succeed Don Vito upon his death. However, Sonny is quite the loose cannon, as is evident by James Caan’s smoldering performance, and Don Vito realizes that he must look to another successor. His second son, the awkward, cowardly Fredo, is pretty much a lost cause. Michael is a more levelheaded and logical decision maker, and he demonstrates this by taking charge of the situation. Michael recognizes that, as a civilian, he is the only one of the family who can gain access and kill Sollozzo and the corrupt police captain Captain McCluskey (Sterling Hayden). However, after Michael commits double murder, he still sees his violent act as an isolated act of vengeance for the assassination attempt against his father. As a result of the murders, Michael must hide out in Sicily for at least a year, but he still maintains the view that his involvement with the family business is a temporary affair. In Sicily, Michael falls in love with, quickly courts, and marries Appolonia (Simonetta Stefanelli). This happiness is short-lived, for, even in isolation, Michael cannot escape the dangers of the family business. News of Sonny’s assassination arrives, and Appollonia dies in a botched assassination attempt against Michael, who finally realizes that he is the only hope for maintaining the Corleone power.

With the death of his new bride, Michael, newly hardened, surrenders to his fate and returns to America, where he marries Kay and tries to bring peace and dignity to his father’s last years. Michael succeeds in protecting Don Vito from further gangster bloodshed, and the Godfather meets his end while engaging in grandfatherly pursuits. After Don Vito’s death, peace ends between the warring families. Michael is quickly propositioned by a traitor, who aims to arrange a “safe” meeting for the rival families to assassinate Michael. This leads Michael to engineer the spectacularly chilling “Baptism Bloodbath” scene and become recognized as the new Godfather. Throughout The Godfather, it’s difficult to not identify with Michael, and Pacino’s uncharacterisically controlled take on the role of Michael Corleone was the mark of one of the greatest antiheroes in cinema. Even more remarkable is Coppola’s relatively neutral presentation of Michael’s transformation, which allows us to form our own judgments about the film, and, most importantly, surrender to the The Godfather saga.

Agent Bedhead (a.k.a. “Kimberly”) lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She can also be found at agentbedhead.com.


Badlands | Pajiba Love 06/24/08



Comments

hat tip, agent beadhead for the guts to go for the mother of the 70's movies

another hat tip for making a good job of it.

James Caan's death scene is the greatest ad for EZ pass ever made

Posted by: thaf at June 24, 2008 3:38 PM

Well done, Bedhead.

There has not been a better movie that involves the mob made since The Godfather. You picked a very hard movie to review and did a nice job with it.

I will argue with anyone that The Godfather is the best movie made in Hollywood. Ever.

Posted by: Melody at June 24, 2008 3:40 PM

James Caan's death scene is the greatest ad for EZ pass ever made

Ha! Awesome.

Great review Bedhead, I would neve have the balls to tackle such an iconic film. Michael Corleone is one of the most fascinating film characters ever.

Posted by: Julie at June 24, 2008 3:46 PM

I second Melody...but don't forget Godfather 2.

Posted by: Amy at June 24, 2008 3:54 PM

Godfather 1 is one of the few movies that if I come across it when flipping channels, I have to watch until the end.

Posted by: Siddhartha at June 24, 2008 3:54 PM

James Caan's death scene is the greatest ad for EZ pass ever made

hahaha!
you should pitch that idea thaf, hee

excellent review Bedhead, I especially agree with the "greatest anitheros in cinema". anitheros are my favorite anyways, they force the writer/director/actor to give the character more depth and dimension
I think that is why I usually like the villians better than the good guys in movies
I it easy to write a 2-d hero, for some reason the villians are always much more interesting in the end

Posted by: Bethy at June 24, 2008 3:56 PM

Melody,

I'll see your Godfather and raise you Goodfellas.

Posted by: Ben at June 24, 2008 3:59 PM

Ben, Goodfellas is a great movie and one of my top five overall. Godfather I is still better.

Posted by: Melody at June 24, 2008 4:02 PM

There is a film called "Godfather III". Pacino is in it and Coppola directed it. But I say to you all there is no third Godfather movie.

Posted by: brouhaha at June 24, 2008 4:04 PM

I was talking to a guy recently who made the case that this is the Great American Film, for many reasons that he elaborated and now I can't remember because...

that was a KICK-ASS REVIEW. Seriously. I had to read it a second time just to truly relish the finer points. And I never do that. Great job, one of the best.

Now I know what the husband and I are watching tonight. In a darkened living room. With Thai takeout.

Posted by: Anastasia at June 24, 2008 4:04 PM

Jesus, you don't go for the easy picks, do you. Like I said before: balls, AB. Balls.

I don't know that I can agree that this is The Greatest Film ever, but that's mainly because I haven't seen every film. I can say that it is likely one of the best, if not THE best, of those I've seen.

Nicely done, particularly those first couple of paragraphs.

Posted by: TK at June 24, 2008 4:08 PM

Bra-fucking-vo Bedhead. A great review to go with a great movie. It's too bad that Pacino has become a walking caricature lately, because he is perfect in this movie.

Posted by: jM at June 24, 2008 4:12 PM

Reviewing this movie was a nearly impossible task, but this is a weak effort from the Pajiba staff. Dan Carlson or John Williams deserved this assignment.

Posted by: Shooter at June 24, 2008 4:19 PM

I'll confess: I've never seen the Godfather. My husband would tell you though that this is just the beginning of a long list of "Movies My Wife Missed While Living Under Her Rock". I really enjoyed your review, and even though I've always meant to get around to seeing this one, you've definitely moved it up on my priority list.

Posted by: JTate at June 24, 2008 4:48 PM

Amazing job, Bedhead. Truly. You were right in limiting the scope of your critique, though; this is a film that could easily support whole books' worth of criticism and analysis.

The best compliment I can give you is this: Your review has given me a craving to watch this movie again, right now.

Posted by: Jerce at June 24, 2008 5:00 PM

Best review I've read of The Godfather. Maybe Shooter could write a better one, but I doubt it. ;)

Posted by: jvon at June 24, 2008 5:03 PM

The Godfather Parts I and II are THE American Saga. Love, betrayal, murder, the rise to power of Michael Corleone combined with the loss of everything that made him Mikey.

And 36 years later, still so quotable and mandatory Guy movie watching.

Posted by: BFFredo at June 24, 2008 5:08 PM

Nice treatment for a great film. Good job, AB.

JTate, go see the movie! What, are you still here?

Posted by: michelle at June 24, 2008 5:09 PM

Fantastic job, AB. If I may second Jerce, I have a strong urge to watch this right now.

Ah, JTate. It's okay. We don't judge. I think I was 9 or 10 the first time I saw this, but I'm an Eye-tal, so there you go.

Posted by: Nicole at June 24, 2008 5:25 PM

No question: this movie is one you can't watch too many time. It wears you down. Even if you hate it the first time you watch it, watch it a second time and you will not hate it. After the third time, you will hate yourself for hating it.

Posted by: hater in siloam springs at June 24, 2008 5:27 PM

"Perhaps the closest Coppola ever got to reaching some slight form of epic street cred again was with Bram Stoker's Dracula,"

*COUGH*Apocalypse Now*COUGH*

Posted by: NF at June 24, 2008 5:52 PM

I'm with JTate. I've never seen the Godfather. My boyfriend is always astonished at the number of "Movies Everyone Must Have Seen" that I haven't.

The upside is my employer loves it because I've never heard of 95% of our clients. They think it's funny to have me call the likes of Charlie Kaufmann and Frank Miller (I have since been told who these people are) and then talk to them like normal people. When I come home at night and tell my boyfriend what idiots I work with, he sits there stunned saying, "I can't believe you talked to insert famous name."

I enjoy the rock I live under. No idiots live there.

Posted by: Yen Gi at June 24, 2008 6:15 PM

I have also never seen this movie.

Posted by: Stew at June 24, 2008 6:31 PM

"Based upon the bestselling novel by Mario Puzo, The Godfather (1972) is one of those rare film adaptations that perfectly captures every essential aspect of its source material. "

Nonsense! The Godfather, the film, is far, far, FAR superior to its source material. One of the rare exceptions to an otherwise steadfast rule.

End of line.

Posted by: Armando at June 24, 2008 6:50 PM

Should I even bother seeing Godfather 3, for completeness sake? I hear such bad things.

Posted by: Mick J at June 24, 2008 7:13 PM

Mick J, let me tell you a little something about Godfather III.

It does not exist.

Sofia Coppolla did not appear in this film and give the worst acting performance this side of George W. Bush as President of the United States of America. It was merely a figment of my tortured imagination. It did not happen.

Go back to what you were doing. We never had this conversation.

Posted by: greer at June 24, 2008 7:36 PM

I'm with NF on this one.

Am I missing something? Is it part of the Pajiba code to dislike/ignore Apocalypse Now?

Nice review. However, this movie is so freaking perfect that it's pretty hard to mess up the review.

Posted by: mc at June 24, 2008 7:47 PM

I used to refuse the existence of Part III, but I've come to like it. Sofia does put in a horrible performance. But, if you keep an open mind when you watch it, it's good movie, EXCEPT the whole insestual relationship part. Without that, it would have been a truly good movie.

Posted by: Riles at June 24, 2008 8:01 PM

The first and only time I saw The Godfather was in 1983 when one of my dad's friends bought all three movies on VHS (and I can't even imagine how much he shelled out for them back then) and we went over for a marathon viewing. I was 19 at the time and I really don't think I appreciated what I was seeing.

AB, thanks to your fantastic review, I'm putting both I and II on my Netflix queue. Thanks to the comments here, I'll give III a miss.

Posted by: telesilla at June 24, 2008 8:10 PM

great, great review! i love the godfather and its sequel so very much. i only own the third one because of the deal i got on the boxset on ebay. and despite the fact that i own them, i will watch them every single time they air on bravo...which, it seems lately, is quite a lot.

Posted by: kelley at June 24, 2008 8:38 PM

I'm with Riles. Godfather III is not THAT bad. It's a shadow of its predecessors, to be sure, but it's not as horrible as everyone says...so long as one ignores Sophia Coppola. I mean, DAMN!

I'm actually of the minority who finds Godfather I superior to Godfather II, which many think is the better film. It's good, but I just can't see through the weird, flashback heavy structure. Maybe I'm just weird.

And yes, Anastasia, your guy friend may be right. This may be THE American film par excellence. It may out-Citizen Kane Citizen Kane.

Posted by: Armando at June 24, 2008 9:14 PM

Hella good, AB.

I would never dream of the balls to take on a review such as this.

For those of you who have never seen the movie, as great a review as this is, there is so much more than can be expressed in so short a writing. You have to experience it for yourself, not once, but at least twice, because there are elements that you miss the first time while you are so focused on the story itself. The second time, you understand the plot and are allowed to simply sit back and enjoy the artistry.

For the women amongst the non-believers: The success and passion dedicated to these films has long been attributed to the bravado of the men and thus the 'booyah!' pounding of the chest of the men who are fans. Don't be fooled, I have seen The Godfather and Godfather II so many times that I've lost count. It has become a 'flypaper' movie which holds me like super-glue each time I come upon it while flipping the channels. Watch it when you can actually watch it...none of the catching a glimpse over your shoulder whilst doing the household chores for this one.

Great job, AB. Now, I wonder, how interesting might it be to read a 'he said/she said' review of this fine movie.

Posted by: jmflynny at June 24, 2008 9:25 PM

The first issue I have to take is with Armando. The book is fantastic. It really gets into the mind of Michael and what could almost be described as rancor for the family business. The relationship with Kay is better explained, Fredo is explained, Luca Brasi is spelled out. The whole angle with Jonny Fontaine is explained. You learn everything about the other families, as well as how Tessio and Clemenza came to be the Don's caporegimes.

For those that really love this movie, read the book, I guarantee you will not be disappointed.

As for GF3, it came out on my birthday of that year, and the HBO special on it at the time warned potential viewers of the rawness of Sophia Coppola. The rumor always was that Wynona Ryder was supposed to play the role, is there any truth to that and does it make the movie better?

Posted by: richmac at June 24, 2008 9:40 PM

Sofia Coppola is the Jar-Jar Binks of the Godfather franchise. I am waiting for someone to produce a digitally remastered version where all of the scenes where she speaks are edited out.

Diversion idea? What character would you digitally remove from a film to make it better?

Posted by: greer at June 24, 2008 9:48 PM

I love that even though I've watched this movie many times, I can still get completely lost in it - as if it was the first time.

My favorite Pacino performance though, will forever remain in Dog Day Afternoon.

Posted by: Cindy at June 24, 2008 10:07 PM

richmac - yes, Winona Ryder was originally slated for Sophia's role, but dropped out. Obviously there weren't any bad feelings since Francis Ford went on to cast her in Bram Stoker's Dracula as his female lead.

The problem with Sophia Coppola's performance is that she's going up against Al Pacino (top 5 movie actor of all time) and Andy Garcia (one of the underrated, under the radar actors of the last 20 years) for most of her screen time. Her lack of skills is blatantly obvious.

BTW, while I didn't include Godfather 3, I think that the backlash against it is indicative of just how high the previous 2 were and are held.

And a "Movies that Never Existed" would be a fun afternoon diversion (hint).

Posted by: BFFredo at June 24, 2008 10:23 PM

Although inferior, I still feel that The Godfather III is essential viewing. Yes Sofia Coppolla is painful to watch, but I feel that it brings closure to an already epic story. Besides, it's still a lot better than a lot of the shit that gets a green light in Hollywood these days. And it has provided the world with more than a few pop culture moments. The Godfather II will always be my favourite. The transitions between the current day Corleone family and the story of Vito's own rise to power are beautifully crafted and engaging.

Posted by: Dexter Morgan at June 24, 2008 10:37 PM

Sonny beating the hell out of Carlo was the best fight scene ever. Trash Can + Face = Awesome.

Posted by: Lucas at June 24, 2008 10:44 PM

Hm. Decisions, decisions.

I guess I'll give it a whirl sometime. All I know is Pacino "gets pulled back in." How ominous.

Posted by: Mick J at June 24, 2008 10:47 PM

Sonny beating the hell out of Carlo was the best fight scene ever. Trash Can + Face = Awesome.

Awesome yes. But as awesome as the scene where Mo Green puts his glasses on just in time to see the last thing he ever will?

"I'm Mo Green!"... Comeuppance I say!

Posted by: Dexter Morgan at June 24, 2008 10:50 PM

I guess I'll give it a whirl sometime. All I know is Pacino "gets pulled back in." How ominous.

Just one of those pop culture moments I'm talking about that came from the third film.

Posted by: Dexter Morgan at June 24, 2008 10:53 PM

Loved the review. I'm hoping a review of Godfather II is soon to follow -- in my opinion an even greater achievement, and the best movie I'm sure I'll ever see. The Godfather, in its performances and its meticulous attention to detail, was just about the toughest act to follow that there ever was -- and yet Coppola managed to expand on everything that made the first film the quintessential movie experience by adding a scope that's just breathtaking in its immensity. It took huge balls to even try, and it's the best.

Posted by: sansho1 at June 24, 2008 11:13 PM

Never seen it.

*Hangs head*

Sorry ... Someday ...

Posted by: bucdaddy at June 24, 2008 11:14 PM

I agree with Armando.

This movie was 17 billion times better than Puzo's novel.

For those who haven't read it, he devotes several pages about a woman with an unnaturally deep vagina.

No really, I am not making that up.

Posted by: Siddhartha at June 24, 2008 11:51 PM

This is my second all time favorite movie (my favorite is Serenity). Anytime its on tv I have to stop and watch the whole thing. Brando's performance is just incredible. Pacino and Coppola make you identify with and feel sorry for a guy who essentially murders people for a living.

I think they achieve that because even though the family is pretty well off, they represent the struggle against the elites that keep people from achieving the American Dream. The Corleones haven't achieved that status yet. Michael was supposed to be the one who was a Senator or Governor, the legit one who could bring the family into that elite status. We empathize with Michael because like him, we can't make it into that elite status either.

Vito: "There just wasn't enough time Michael. Wasn't enough time"

Michael: "We'll get there pop. We'll get there."

That exchange speaks to what I was talking about. To me that is the core of what the movie is about.

Posted by: Dave at June 25, 2008 12:43 AM

I really think III is important to see for completeness.
As bad as Sofia Copala is, Talia Shire is brilliant. I love watching her in GFIII. And it is a beautiful looking film, lush rich colors.

Bram Stoker's Dracula...as amazing and oh, so hot Gary Olman is, Reeves is just so, so awful.
So awful...

Great Review, btw.

Posted by: Jules at June 25, 2008 1:05 AM

Like most people, Enzo is pretty much scared shitless at this point and pulls out a cigarette, but his hands are shaking so violently that lighting up is an impossibility. Michael then takes the lighter, easily lights the cigarette, and, unavoidably, notices that his hands are as steady as they come. At that moment, Michael seems to realize that his life has irreversibly changed.

I always thought that in this scene Michael was looking at the lighter for some reason and I could never figure out why. That's because he was looking at his hands and not the lighter. It definitely makes a lot more sense. Just goes to show you how bright I am.

Posted by: RAT at June 25, 2008 1:34 AM

Yeah..weird that you guys missed out Apocalypse Now for Coppola's achievements, that film is in many ways equal to the Godfather although I wouldn't for the life of me try to argue this opinion.

Great review, I clicked on the review wondering how you were going to tackle it, and was very please with how it was handled. One of the greatest movies of all time.

Posted by: Caillan at June 25, 2008 6:14 AM

Everything about The Godfather - the story, the characters, the casting, the performances, the cinematography, the score - is pretty much perfect. There's other movies I maybe enjoy slightly more - Raiders of the Lost Ark, Terminator, even Aliens, but if I was asked to pick the film I thought was the best, Godfather gets my vote.

As for part III, the thing that struck me most about Sofia Coppola's performance is that even in the scenes where she's just asked to stand there and has no dialogue, she's completely unconvincing.

Posted by: hendero at June 25, 2008 9:06 AM

If The Godfather were a pile of fall leaves I would joyously jump in and cover myself with it.

I love both the book and the movie, I love the subtle nuances of the characters, I love how you find yourself rooting for everything you grew up believing was bad, I love that even as a woman I can watch this masterpiece again and again and never grow tired.

And I want 700 year old Al Pacino to be my baby daddy. Have crushed on him all the way back to Dog Day Afternoon. So what if his balls are probably down to his knees?

Posted by: scorzi at June 25, 2008 10:00 AM

Super review! I and II are 2 of my favorite all-time films, but I give the ever so slight nod to II. I can't articulate a reason; I just like it slightly better. I think my favorite scene is in the ballroom in Havanna, when Michael fully realizes Fredo's betrayal, and he's standing in the background behind Fredo, and his head just drops into his hands. Unbelievable direction and acting. Perfect.

Posted by: hoof hearted at June 25, 2008 10:29 AM

Although a lot of people say that Godfather II is superior, I strongly disagree. I think that it and Godfather III had the same essential flaw, which ultimately weakens both more than Sofia Coppola alone could do.

In both, the linchpin to the conspiracy is someone who is a close family friend--so close we've never heard of them before. Now, I don't expect that a new film will have no major new characters. But to introduce someone as a significant, lifelong tie, when in fact that character has never even been mentioned? It doesn't work. In the first movie, you believed that those people had been together for years. It's part of what made the movie work. Both sequels lack that. Particularly in III, there were two much better choices for the traitor. I'll even stretch and say there was a third slightly better choice. But alas, Coppola didn't go there, and that hurt the movie more than the casting.

Posted by: KateNonymous at June 25, 2008 12:08 PM

I completely agree with Armando and Siddhartha, the movie was far, far superior to the book. Mario Puzo is a hack...one in a long line of hacks like Dan Brown, John Grisham et al who write terrific stories/page-turners, but have absolutely no ear for dialogue or idea of reality. Don't get me wrong, they all have more writing talent than I could ever have, but great writers/novelists they are not...more like great plotters.

As for the movie, far better than its source material deserved and an absolute classic. For a long time, my favorite movie ever and the best gangster movie of all time....that is until Goodfellas which, IMO, is cinematic perfection.

Great review though, AB.

Posted by: boogs at June 25, 2008 12:26 PM

In contrast, though, The Sicilian is much better in its original book form than it was as a movie. Which tells you quite a bit about the movie.

Posted by: KateNonymous at June 25, 2008 12:34 PM

I didn't see these GF I & II until 6-7 years ago. I avoided them because I thought they were just testosterone pumping "guy movies." I was very, very wrong. The two movies were on back to back one day while I was baking bread and the loaves turned to junk as I watched all 6+ hours in awed silence. After that day, Coppola made me an offer I cannot refuse: every time GF is on cable, I'm compelled to watch.

Posted by: ohgrl at June 25, 2008 1:26 PM

Fav scene that still gives me chills:

When Mikey kisses Fredo, recreating the Judas/Jesus betrayal and says "I know it was you Fredo...you broke my heart."

AWESOME!!!

Posted by: scorzi at June 25, 2008 1:32 PM

You didn't point out that it wasn't just Michael's desire to escape the family business, Don Vito wanted him to as well. When told that Michael has done the killing, Vito is visibly upset. Michael, the educated war hero, was his hope for a "respectable" legacy.

Posted by: Maxwell Edison at June 25, 2008 2:29 PM

Discussion question: When television took apart Book II and bookended The Godfather chronologically with the Young Vito (Robert DeNiro) and the Don Michael sections, was that a valid decision that successfully turned the two films into a unified, epic whole, or was it a crime against film?

I don't think of I and II as separate entities, and I'm surprised no one has yet mentioned the masterstroke of putting DeNiro in II. The added texture and symmetry brought by his performance and Vito's immigrant experience are what make the two films together just about the greatest total-immersion experience the movies have ever accomplished.

Posted by: pk at June 25, 2008 2:53 PM

I love this movie! I watched it for the first time about 2 years ago, totally expecting to not like it. I didn't think I was into gangster movies. As Bedhead pointed out, it is so much more! I became obsessed with I and II after watching them...and of course Al Pacino.

Thanks for the great review!

Posted by: justamanda at June 25, 2008 3:23 PM

The closest he ever got to the original street cred was "Dracula"?

How about "Apocalypse Now"???????????????????

Posted by: WhatThe? at June 25, 2008 6:19 PM

Scorzi:

That was in Godfather Part II

Posted by: Brett at June 25, 2008 6:22 PM

Make that "Apocalypse Now Redux" - !

BBC or someone surveyed film critics and historians and asked what was the best film in the last 25 yrs (this was ~2000) -- so as to get recent results since Citizen Kane always topped lists. Apoc. Now topped the lists.

The explanation for overlooking this movie should be interesting.

Posted by: Yowsers at June 25, 2008 10:52 PM

I'm going to have to agree with my briefly-monikered fellow readers defending [i]Apocalypse Now[/i].

No epic street cred!? Coppola: "We had access to too much money, too much equipment, and little by little we went insane." Although it has its inherent flaws, this is a big film, both in its ambition and its scope on the screen.

As for quality, I'd argue that [i]The Conversation[/i] is more representative of Coppola's talent than [i]Dracula[/i].

Posted by: fuzzy at June 25, 2008 11:44 PM

I think the De Niro flashback portions of II are much stronger than the closer-to-present-day Pacino sections.

Posted by: KateNonymous at June 26, 2008 1:24 AM

Aw, Fuzzy, you have to use the lessthan/greaterthan signs in html, not the brackets. Brackets only work on message boards- as much as we talk, we're not a true message board.

I've never seen any of the Godfather movies.

[prepares to get tomatoes chucked at her head.]

Posted by: Jaci at June 26, 2008 11:44 AM

Brett: very true. But still great!

Posted by: scorzi at June 26, 2008 12:34 PM

Yeah, I agree with Yowsers and Fuzzy. This review pretty much lost me, with the omission of "Apocalypse Now"...

If you're going to be reviewing one of the most famous American movies ever created by one of the most influential American directors in the last half century, you'd better know his cinematic back log.

Pretty disappointing, otherwise.

Posted by: WhatThe? at June 27, 2008 2:49 PM

Had it ever occurred to you rude types that this critic was perfectly aware of this "omission" and simply held a different opinion?

It seems fairly disappointing that you would automatically assume she was ignorant of such a "cinematic back log."

Check the production notes for Apocalypse Now. Not pretty.

Posted by: the Lad at June 28, 2008 2:14 PM

I'm commenting a little late on this one, but I'm convinced that Sophia Coppola's simpering smile-y and whiny performances in GIII and Peggy Sue Got Married are the reason that I hate every film she's directed. That and the fact that when I saw her interviewed on Oscar night a few years ago she had that same snarky, "I'm so much better than this" half-smile on her face. God she irritates me, and I don't want to spoil anything, but I cheered during the scene near the end on the church steps involving her. At least she was a little more convincing, physically, as Al Pacino's daughter than she was as Kathleen Turner's sister.

Posted by: Alexandra at June 29, 2008 9:04 PM

Likewise, my own differing opinion stands. Disagree away.

The fact that "Apoc. N" got off the ground and didn't flounder into doomed, large budget movie stinkers is an amazing feat. Coppola is such a mythical figure, one who has had a career of both brilliance and disappointments that it just made me a little ornery to see one of his greats left out, in favor of "Dracula". I just don't see that as being true (or even fair) to the director.

But again, that's just my viewpoint.

Posted by: WhatThe? at June 30, 2008 10:27 PM

I finally saw this movie tonight, together with my husband. Amazing.

Odd trivia: the Cadillac that Marlon Brando/Vito falls against as he's shot? My dad now owns that car. He bought it back in the 80s from a man who was a food critic for the Dallas Morning News. He even has the prop pane of windowglass with the bullet hole in it.

Posted by: Noelegy at August 15, 2008 11:39 PM