gr3.jpg
Crazy at Heart and Absolutely Stupid on Top

Ghost Rider / Daniel Carlson

Film Reviews | February 16, 2007 | Comments (62)


There’s an amount of suspended disbelief inherent in any movie based on a comic book: When Batman walks up to someone, no one ever says, “Why are you wearing all that creepy, fetishy rubber and a mask?” And that’s OK. Comic-book movies, even/especially the best of them, aren’t meant to be taken completely seriously but enjoyed in the moment as the pop spectacles they are. But oh, Ghost Rider could be the most taxing film I’ve seen in years when it comes to forfeiting your self-respect in order to glean whatever brief joy may be available in the nonsensical plot and idiotic dressing passing itself off as attitude or style. On that great continuum of comic-book flicks, writer-director Mark Steven Johnson’s ode to phallic supremacy and giant flaming skulls is closer to Captain America than Spider-Man; in fact, the trailer for Spider-Man 3 was attached to Ghost Rider, and those two or three minutes were more entertaining than the actual film I was there to see.

Nicolas Cage stars as the unfortunately named Johnny Blaze, a stuntman who makes a living driving his motorcycle very fast over large objects and almost dying in the process. Johnny Blaze — J.B. to his buds — drives so crazy because he’s trying to outrun the demons of his past, which in this case are actual demons: As a teenager, young J.B. (played with wooden confusion by Matt Long) sells his soul to Mephistopheles to save his dying dad from cancer. His dad gets better, but what with the devil being kind of a prick, J.B.’s dad winds up dying the next day during one of the flaming-hoop motorcycle jumps that he and his son perform at carnivals. This causes J.B. to hold an understandable grudge against the devil, who soon confronts J.B. and gives him the standard Corleone rigmarole: One day I will call upon you to perform a service, etc., etc. With his father’s semi-murder on his hands, J.B. blows out of town, abandoning his girlfriend, Roxanne, in the process.

Now that J.B.’s all grown up, he’s still riding bikes and trying to kill himself, assisted by his sidekick, Mack (Donal Logue), who’s J.B.’s pit crew chief and requisite less-attractive friend. One day, as J.B. prepares an ill-advised stunt to jump the length of a football field over several helicopters, Roxanne (Eva Mendes), now a reporter, shows back up to interview him for some arbitrary news outlet. J.B. sees this confluence of his past and present as a “sign,” and Cage amps up the cornpone charm and gruesome Southern accent as he gets all twitterpated and asks her out. Roxanne, being your typical spineless woman in a comic-book movie whose sole purpose is to offer emotional and sexual succor to the hero no matter how many times he does her wrong, accepts.

Predictably, this is when Satan reappears to cash in his marker. He assigns J.B. to be the Ghost Rider, a kind of gopher for the devil who does the dark lord’s bidding in hopes of earning a reprieve from the curse. Mephistopheles sticks J.B. on a chopper — an evil chopper — and sends him after Blackheart (Wes Bentley), Mephistopheles’ own kid who’s after some kind of contract that Mephistopheles has tried and failed to collect from previous Ghost Riders. Johnson plays fast and loose with the metaphysical specifics of said contract, but apparently it contains 1,000 evil souls, or ones that are eviler than usual anyway, and whoever gets the contract can use it to unleash those souls and become, um, super-evil. Why Blackheart or Mephistopheles needs that much extra juice is pretty vague, since Mephistopheles already has the power to enslave men’s souls in exchange for petty favors, and Blackheart can kill people just by touching them. But hey, in Hell, it’s all about ego. Ghost Rider is aided in his quest by a local cemetery caretaker (Sam Elliott), who pretty conveniently knows everything there is about Ghost Riders, and gives him clues to help him.

Cage, who draws his stage name from another Marvel character, has given some stunning performances in the past, namely Leaving Las Vegas and Adaptation. But his work here devolves into outright wackiness, complete with little character quirks that feel completely alien to the film: J.B.’s penchant for jelly beans and Carpenters tunes, or the bizarre scene in which he drinks hot coffee right from the pot before a jump. What’s worse, the decision to make J.B. so resolutely Southern turns him into a distracting caricature instead of a believable protagonist. Mendes isn’t called upon to do more than pout her lips and wear halfway-unbuttoned shirts, and acquits herself nobly. As Mephistopheles, Fonda hams it up all the way, and winds up being the only honest-feeling thing in the movie.

It’s J.B.’s mission to stop the contract from being collected, but Johnson can’t even imbue that flimsy carrot-and-stick setup with anything approaching tension. Part of the problem is that movies based on comic books are inherently predictable; Spider-Man or Batman or Superman may suffer setbacks, and may even watch their friends die, but they always win. Always. But the far greater problem weighing on Ghost Rider (and Ghost Rider) is Johnson’s fierce determination to avoid finding any kind of consistent tone. Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man series has goofy earnestness; Batman Begins revels in the dark depths of the hero’s fate; Superman Returns has an unhealthy messiah complex. But Ghost Rider straddles the line between pulp tale and self-mocking farce, which makes it impossible to take seriously, even on the light level demanded by comic-book movies.

For instance: When J.B. is out on his first night as Ghost Rider, doing good and avenging, he accidentally breaks his date with Roxanne, who first checks her cell phone to see if she’s missed any calls, then — and please pardon my dramatic italics — pulls a Magic 8 Ball from her purse and shakes it in hopes of finding an answer for why she’s been stood up. Johnson’s sudden and puzzling leap from low pop art to the kind of cheap sight gag you’d see in one of David Zucker’s overtired farces is off-putting and laughable. Is the viewer meant to believe that Roxanne actually carries around that novelty toy for occasions such as this one? Johnson is doing something deeply wrong here by refusing to give his fictional world its own constant reality, which in turn makes it impossible to believe in the characters, and their lives, and their actions, and their consequences.

Perhaps worst of all is Johnson’s curious take on the ins and outs of damnation. As J.B. says to the caretaker, “He may have my soul, but he doesn’t have my spirit.” The caretaker then responds, “Any man who sells his soul for love has the power to change the world,” before going on to pontificate that since J.B. sold his soul for the “right reason,” maybe that “puts God on [his] side.” Johnson’s wavering fictional universe is one where the devil is everywhere and God doesn’t show up much, and where Johnny Blaze hates the cursed monster he sees himself becoming but also won’t relinquish that curse when given the opportunity. Johnny pines for a second chance to fix his past, a shot at atonement to make things right, but he’d rather be the devil’s whipping boy than live free. If Johnson’s hero can’t even summon the courage to save himself, how can he save the world?

Daniel Carlson is the managing editor of Pajiba and a low-level employee at a Hollywood industry magazine. You can visit his blog, Slowly Going Bald.


Bridge to Terabithia | Ranting is Good for the Soul





Comments

Hot damn I was hoping for an ode to phallic supremacy and giant flaming vaginas.

Posted by: anikitty at February 16, 2007 8:09 PM

The thought of seeing Nick Cage lift himself from his current quagmire has suddenly been rubbed out. I realize that I may have been expecting a lot from this film (one whose universe I am not truly familiar with), but I always have hope for comic book adaptations. Alas, this will probably have to be Netflixed and viewed with an extra helping of guilt. At least it looked cool.

Posted by: ScarletKnight at February 16, 2007 8:09 PM

Oh. My. God. A Magic 8-Ball? Seriously?

The worst part is, I actually am a fan of the character, but considering I am a fan of Daredevil as well, and seeing the result from Johnson's attempt with that character, I should have expected this. He might not be Ratner bad, but he obviously isn't quite as competent as his fellow comic-book-movie directors.

All I ask is that people stay on the movie's quality, and not transfer it into general comic book bashing. Of course, due to my comments on the Daddy's Little Girls thread, I may have some commenter's karma payback coming my way.

Posted by: Vermillion at February 16, 2007 8:33 PM

I'm in the middle of reading Faust right now and this movie sounds exactly like Goethe's classic. Except for the depth, humanity and beautiful lyric poetry.

Posted by: jbrader at February 16, 2007 8:41 PM

It seems like Donal Logue has the hardest job in this movie - no one's less attractive than Nicholas Cage.

Posted by: ormond at February 16, 2007 8:44 PM

I'm going just to see the magic that is Nick Cage's weave.

Posted by: ciji at February 16, 2007 9:21 PM

Everybody knows Nicolas Cage is a complete mong.

But I weep for Wes Bentley.

I weep.

Posted by: Jerce at February 16, 2007 9:30 PM

I second that Donal Logue comment. The LESS attractive friend? I've always thought he was adorable! And Nicholas Cage? Uuuuggh.

Posted by: Lizzy at February 16, 2007 10:10 PM

"Roxanne, being your typical spineless female in a comic-book movie whose sole purpose is to offer emotional and sexual succor to the hero no matter how many times he does her wrong, accepts."


Brilliant.

Posted by: eb at February 16, 2007 11:19 PM

"Johnson's wavering fictional universe is one where the devil is everywhere and God doesn't show up much, and where Johnny Blaze hates the cursed monster he sees himself becoming but also won't relinquish that curse when given the opportunity."

Honestly? That actually sums up the comic book perfectly. Maybe the movie accomplished it's goal,. and you were expecting something else? Don't get me wrong - Daredevil was awful, so I'm cutting Johnson any slack - but maybe he got this part right.

Posted by: TK at February 17, 2007 1:27 AM

uh...you guys think there are good Spiderman films? I can't trust you on this.

Posted by: seth at February 17, 2007 1:53 AM

You're right TK. I'm a fan and even I know the plot contrivances in the comic were just as loose and confused. Johnson, while obviously not the man to improve upon them, was really only working with what he had.

I heard he screwed the character of Blackheart up pretty bad though, if rumor should prove true.

As far as Spiderman is concerned, the first 2 movies were good. Not great considering the changes to the story and timelines, but good. In the context of comic book movies to date, I think that's pretty damn impressive.

Posted by: Smokin at February 17, 2007 2:57 AM

I don't know if I was the only one who noticed this, but I think Nic Cage took his love of Elvis a bit too far from various hand gestures to sunglasses and jumpsuits to a really rather dubious Souther accent that all screamed Elvis to me!

Posted by: Ann at February 17, 2007 4:52 AM

...little character quirks that feel completely alien to the film: J.B.'s penchant for jelly beans and Carpenters tunes, or the bizarre scene in which he drinks hot coffee right from the pot before a jump.

Oh, that drives me crazy! Lazy screenwriters who think they can give a character some completely random quirk and that will "flesh them out." Cheap and amateurish -- it just depresses me when I see that in a film and closes me off to any connection with it. (I'm assuming here that jelly beans and the Carpenters were not in the original comic book; if I'm mistaken, I apologize. But I'd say random quirks are cheap and lazy in any writing.)

Posted by: Lilly at February 17, 2007 7:31 AM

This movie could have been written by freakin' John Grisham, it's a fucking contract dispute.

The question then becomes, do I want to subject myself to Cage doing his idea of a southern accent?

No thanks

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 17, 2007 7:48 AM

The Magic 8 Ball thing? Totally REASONABLE. I always have mine on me, along with my favorite deck of tarot cards, my battered ouija board, my crystal ball, AND loose tea leaves suitable for reading. Oh, and my chicken foot... for luck, you know. What the hell do YOU all carry? Toothpicks? Pocket knives? GUM?

Losers.

Posted by: Demonic Pancake at February 17, 2007 11:06 AM

Demonic Pancake? Love the moniker. More of a waffle girl, myself.

Glad to know I'm not the only who thinks Donal Logue is way more attractive than Nicolas Cage. Although I will admit, in full disclosure, I thought he was a hottie in Face Off. Shut up. I was 18 or 19 when the movie hit the box office. And the photos I've seen of Nic lately promoting the movie? A little scary. I have nothing against balding men at all, but never should male pattern baldness and a mullet be combined. Just sayin'.

Posted by: Daphne at February 17, 2007 12:36 PM

I was expecting absolutely nothing from this film and I got in for free and I had a good time watching it. It was hilarious! There's a scene where a chubby gothy girl gets interviewed about G.R. saving her from a mugging and she does the Vampire LARPing hand signal for "invisible". It was so hilarious. This was not a good movie by any, ANY stretch of the imagination, but it was seriously funny. But not the kind of funny you should pay to see.

And yes, they fucked Blackheart up completely.

Posted by: Miranda at February 17, 2007 1:15 PM

I saw this as a free preview and I hadn't heard of the comic book so I had no expectations. We got there over an hour early and there were already people lined up triple wide to get in - always a sure sign of a comic book movie.

Overall I really liked the movie and was surprised when I saw what horrible reviews it got. The effects were amazing, but not overwhelming (unlike a Star Wars 'never-blink-or-you-miss-it-non-stop-special-effects-for-the sake-of-special-effects-and-no-plot fest) there was a definite sense of the Elvis-ishness, but overall the movie didn't take itself so seriously and to me, was funny when it meant to be) and thoroughly action packed. It did even more in that unlike most other movie directors these days, it was under 3 hours. For the record, I never looked at my watch once thinking 'is this over yet?'

On a side note, I had a completely different experience regarding Eva Mendes's role. Every time she took the screen there were audible moans, fidgeting and the sighs of manly appreciation for the duration of her scenes. So this movie is appreciated by the attendees, in this regard at least.

Overall, I'd say give this a try.

Posted by: rdelgratia at February 17, 2007 3:25 PM

"Put down the bunny . . ." says Cameron Poe in what was surely a worse Southern accent than the one Nic Cage wraps his mouth around here. Good lord. Whoever thought it would be a good idea to have Nicolas Coppola, for pete's sake, be from the South I have no idea. Matthew McConaughey was unavailable? He's as bad an actor as Cage, and surely less expensive . . .

Posted by: Kitty X at February 17, 2007 4:19 PM

I decided that the demonic band of hardy boys (Blackheart and his pals) should be re-named "The Hot Topic Crew" --this has to be the worst movie i've EVER seen...but laughing at it was certainly fun...

Posted by: Kate at February 17, 2007 7:16 PM

Thanks for letting me know my instincts about this movie (based purely on the trailer) were correct. I thought "so, he's CURSED with the HORROR of super-awesome magical powers that he loves to use? What a crock of shit." Maybe I'm psychic. Probably a genius too.

I hate Hate HATE that part in the ad where Eva Mendes says "So tonight, you'll... *pathetic noise coupled with hand swipe*?" and Nic Cage says "I believe so." But it makes it bearable if you imagine they're talking about Cage turning into Catwoman.

Posted by: Grumblecakes at February 17, 2007 8:19 PM

I had an inkling this would suck, Hollywood has been ruining so many comic book movies lately, maybe they should leave Marvel alone already...I'm so glad they haven't tackled Sandman comics yet...they're probably on the way tho, those bastards!

Posted by: paris at February 17, 2007 10:46 PM

If Mendes convinces viewers that *she* is a girl, she's probably doing some pretty fine work.

Posted by: Loob at February 18, 2007 2:22 AM

C'mon, it has Toola in it (the goth girl; Toola is a classic character from an Australian show called Fat Pizza) and therefore must be great. Well, not great, but entertainingly ridiculous. It's a comic book.

Although, I would like to know why Eva Mendes' shirt gets more and more unbuttoned as the movie progresses. If the movie were any longer she'd be naked.

Posted by: Tina at February 18, 2007 4:14 AM

And we ALL know Eva Mendes is just a poor man's Roselyn Sanchez.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 18, 2007 7:21 AM

Johnson is doing something deeply wrong here by refusing to give his fictional world its own constant reality, which in turn makes it impossible to believe in the characters, and their lives, and their actions, and their consequences.

That summation is perfect... just perfect. It's an articulation that's useful to describe a problem in many movies that aren't even in the comic book genre. Very cool.

Posted by: brickgrrl at February 18, 2007 1:26 PM

So, Mephistopheles is played by a Fonda. Peter right?

Posted by: Sparker at February 18, 2007 2:25 PM

My friends keep wanting to see it, but I will not have my movie ticket be used as a statistic to encourage these horrible movies to be made because the opening weekend gross was huge. Sheesh. I guess Cage couldn't get into a Spiderman movie, or a Superman movie, so he was desperate enough to settle for this claptrap.
And Paris, I really hope the rumors I've heard regarding Gaiman's Death character having a movie never come about, I'm sure it'd be a piece of crap with Sienna Miller or whatever.

Posted by: naive_charm at February 18, 2007 9:17 PM

No, there are no good Spiderman films. They define suck.

Posted by: seth at February 19, 2007 12:26 AM

Sparker - They had to use Peter. Jane wasn't available.

Posted by: Uncle JR at February 19, 2007 7:23 AM

The devil made things even worse for Blaze and Roxanne, in that she aged 10 years more slowly than he did.

The thing that irked me most about the supposedly throwaway moments of absurdity were that they weren't (other than the 8-ball) thrown away. The Carpenters, the jelly beans, all of that could have been a clue that the director knew what you were watching was hokum, but we're all going to take this stupid ride together, so look for the fun parts. Instead, the characters had to comment on the quirks, which made it obvious that those behind the scenes thought they were so clever, they had to have attention called to them.

Posted by: Patrick at February 19, 2007 12:57 PM

Is this the same southern accent on J.B from Cage's Con Air, and does J.B. call Roxanne his "hummin'bird"?

Posted by: John at February 19, 2007 2:59 PM

Thanks, John. Perhaps I was too obtuse in my own reference to Con Air. But, then again, perhaps no one gave a shit. I'm going for option #2 . . .

Posted by: Kitty X at February 19, 2007 6:50 PM

I've never walked out on anything, because as bad as anything I've seen was--and I've seen "Godzilla", "Vampires", and "Van Helsing", I always thought--however misguided (s)he might've been--that the director had tried to make a good movie.

"Ghost Rider" was lazy beneath contempt. I stayed through the horrible trailer-style editing, a generic teen romance, Cage's non-acting/wavering accent... all expected. But the doctor's letter telling X that he had tumerous masses. What doctor's office writes a note instead of having you come in for news like that?
A fifth grader would know better than that. Then again, maybe fifth grade has changed since I was in school.

Posted by: Trick at February 20, 2007 10:40 AM

One of the large groups of Eastern Europeans that populate Aspen this time of year settled in the row behind me at the Ghost Rider showing I went to. They had among them an individual serving as a translator, loudly explaining the trailers for Spider Man 3 and other forgettable films to his eager companions. This continued into the first five minutes of the feature, at which point the monologue behind me and its excitable accompaniment trailed to a stop. Evidently a grasp of the English language was not required to "appreciate" the subtleties of this film.

Might I conclude with this lament...
Oh Wes Bentley, your sinister good looks have taken you to a dark place. Take time now and find solace in this otherwise disheartening truth-- because your star never truly rose, your fall from grace shall be a brief one.

Posted by: VuhDanessa at February 20, 2007 11:46 AM

This movie was awesomely bad. Come On! I enjoyed every minute of it and almost slapped my opinionated date for his barely audible criticisms- because you can't seriously criticize or analyze a movie like this- you'd be dizzy. This is an entertaining suckfest, and I'd see it again in a heartbeat. Seriously, how well did Eva Mendes' rack out-act her?

Posted by: Lauren at February 20, 2007 4:10 PM

Oh Wes Bentley, your sinister good looks have taken you to a dark place. Take time now and find solace in this otherwise disheartening truth-- because your star never truly rose, your fall from grace shall be a brief one.
Damn, that was poetic. And I loves me some poetic humor.

Posted by: Daphne at February 20, 2007 6:19 PM

It's funny to think that Nick Cage has clearly forgotten certain things about acting that he knew WAaayyy back when he starred in Valley Girl (with excellent "Character Actor" Fred Woods!). Like, even when the script blows, make something good happen.

Maybe a Coppola Approved (patent pending) script will someday smack down on, and clear the dust, from his agent's desk.

Feh. After a decade of only Adaptation and Matchstick Men to look at, he should take a break. This one is so bad it's making "Lord of War" look like Dr. Zhivago.

Posted by: damien waldermachen at February 20, 2007 6:54 PM

Just saw this movie last night. The dialogue was cheesy. The villains were stupid and weak. But still, I don't think it's one of the worse comic book movies ever. Defintely in the bottom, but not the worse.

Also what kind of girl says she loves a guy after he ditched her and then sees him again within 5 (or less) days in over 10 years. It's like all of the sudden, now that she realizes that he was the Ghost Rider, she's in love with him again? I don't believe. And don't get me started with that cheesy setting where the "final" battle was taking place. Hahaha actually...the more I think about the movie the worse it gets.

Posted by: Dainty T at February 20, 2007 10:25 PM

I'm assuming you meant to title this "wild at heart," as in the film of the same name- In which Cage starred, totally killing my boner for David Lynch movies.

Posted by: error? at February 20, 2007 10:41 PM

does anyone noe what brand of sunglasses cage is wearing???

Posted by: amy at February 21, 2007 5:14 AM

Huh. I guess when I saw the trailer, I assumed this was one of those movies (along with Snakes On a Plane and (I think) National Treasure)that was a farce for those cool kids in the know and a head-scratcher for cats not with it enough to be in on the joke. I mean, Was the animated flaming skull crap supposed to actually be impressive? Was Cage's Nice 'n' Easy (however receding) coif actually supposed to look edgy? Was this film actually supposed to redeem itself with delightful lines like Cage's complaint that his skull felt like it was "on fire" (Get it!? Flaming skull! On fire! Ah haha!)? Is it not a joke? Well then. . . shoot.

Posted by: Vivien Holda at February 21, 2007 10:54 PM

Amy:

Generally I'm not one to make fun of people's spelling. I think it's a cheap shot--usually better insults are possible with the material provided.

But I have to ask, with all sincerity:

Do you really, really think it's spelled "noe"?

I mean in the real world, not your phone?

Posted by: Vi at February 23, 2007 12:24 AM

I went to see this and was actually shocked. It was so bad it was laughable, but it was also a little bit fabulous. Just a little bit. The over the top acting was a total laugh riot. Only a little fabulous in it's badness.

Posted by: libragirl at February 23, 2007 3:48 PM

Yeah, so Wes Bentley's character was extremely cheesy and a disappointment. But if anything it's good for Bentley's career that he's been officially put on the map as a hot bad guy by fangirls everywhere.

Posted by: Anna at February 24, 2007 8:37 PM

naive_charm, I heard that Cage wanted the role of Superman in the latest movie, but missed out (obviously) so he went for Ghost Rider.

And Tina, Toola is in The Wedge. Which is the suck. It's like comedy used to be a tall, skinny, happy-go-lucky guy. He used to impress you and make you laugh. Flash forward twenty years, and he's not even trying. Comedy is balding, fat and just ate Mexican for lunch. He spends all day searching the internet for porn and eating chip crumbs off his chest. When he finally gets off his arse, he goes to the toilet. What's left in there is "The Wedge".

Posted by: Chantelle at February 25, 2007 5:27 AM

Bahahahahaha, oh man 'The Wedge' sucks.
i found myself in hysterics when J.B was first turning into a skull, that wasn't the only time i laughed too.
Does anyone think Roxy and J.B looked a million times better when they're seventeen. man Eva is hard to look at for long periods of time.

Posted by: Cassie at February 27, 2007 4:47 AM

In case ya'll were wunderin':

from Worstpreviews.com:

"Nicolas Cage is looking to take the lead role in the upcoming remake of David Cronenberg's 1986 cult classic, "The Fly," according to the director himself.

The original film revolved around a brilliant but eccentric scientist (Jeff Goldblum), who begins to transform into a giant man/fly hybrid after one of his experiments goes horribly wrong.

Cronenberg, who is working on an operatic version of the creepy man-insect story, will not be involved in the remake, but he has been kept abreast of developments. "From what I hear, Nic Cage wants the part," he tells E!"

A remake of a remake? My head hurts......

Posted by: Manny at February 28, 2007 2:35 PM

Posted by: Ben at March 2, 2007 10:46 AM

"Nicolas Cage is looking to take the lead role in the upcoming remake of David Cronenberg's 1986 cult classic, 'The Fly'."

That's it. Someone please take a contract out on this guy. Please.

Posted by: ranylt at March 2, 2007 12:34 PM

Ooh, Gaiman fans, don't be so quick to judge - the last couple of movies I have seen that he has been involved in have been of a very high quality, in my opinion. On his blog he mentions that a lot of people have discussed Sandaman with him and he still makes it sound like it's not happening. And don't judge Stardust for Sienna Miller just yet, she is cast as a pretty, vain, shallow bitch and I am guessing she can play that to a tee.

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at March 2, 2007 2:10 PM

I find it funny these posts commenting on the eight ball, and the letter from the doctor all being just "so unrealistic", Hello!!! The movie is about a man who turns into a flaming skeleton.

Posted by: Liz at March 2, 2007 11:41 PM

Wow... after reading most of the comments bashing the comic book genre, I have to say I'm a little disappointed. The fact that most of the people who bash them say that their plots aren't deep enough is the saddest part of it all. They are comic books, people. If you didn't ever notice, they were originally written for children... and 30-something-year-old virgins. When people start complaining about a non-existent, stable universe, I find it more laughable than how many times they misspell words and have grammatical errors; which is pretty funny in itself. For those who say that his accent was a butcher of the real "southern" accent... being FROM Texas, I'm sad to say that he was on the money with his portrayal. Roselyn Sanchez is a beautiful women, no one can argue against that statement and make said argument valid, but saying that Eva Mendez is the poor man's Roselyn... that's just ignorant. If you want to seem smart, try not comparing women based on looks in the first place. The Spider-Man movies were the best they could have possibly been with the almost-dead acting in the Peter Parker role. If you want to see a movie that is great while being based on something in a comic-ish feel, try "Sin City" or the upcoming "300"; both of which are based on the amazing graphic novels by Frank Miller, a visionary genius. But never go to a movie based on a Marvel comic and expect to see something groundbreaking, unless you're wanting to see amazing CGI. I don't know what to be more saddened by, the fact that most of the critics who have commented on here who hate the movie actually expected something more than a purely outrageous work of fiction, or the fact that the only bad things they have to say about the movie are the very things that made the comic a child-based form of entertainment. When you were all little kids, did you watch cartoons expecting to learn life lessons? I know I didn't. I watched them to see animal cruelty committed against cats.

Posted by: Laughing_at_you at March 6, 2007 9:13 PM

I need to make a correction, "woman" should have been typed above in one of the sentences. See? We're all make idiotic mistakes, but some of us don't are willing to admit it when we do.

Posted by: Laughing_at_you at March 6, 2007 9:16 PM

Wow, today is just my day for typing-awareness. Once again, a correction needs to be made on my behalf. The "don't" in the last sentence needs to be taken out for it to even make sense. Sadly, here in Texas, that error might not have been caught. Oh, and when Nick Cage said "Do you still like Italian (pronounced eye-tal-yun)" I was shocked. Most people don't realize how often people in Texas pronounce it in that way... almost sickening. He must have done some research.

Posted by: Laughing_at_myself at March 6, 2007 9:21 PM

I like how everyone seem's to think they know so much about hollywood comic book movies. Then they bash hollywood. Little news flash, I was born and raised in hollywood. The comic book movies come mostly from Warner Brothers, which is in Burbank, probably 20 miles north of hollywood. They arent filmed in hollywood. Hollywood movie executives have nothing to do with them. Its either WB or Universal, also not in hollywood. I know the ads say Universal Studios Hollywood, but its actually in Universal City, which is an actual city, also north of hollywood. Hollywood has Paramount and New Line Cinema. The only comic book movies they have done are Hulk(which was truly awful, but still a far sight better than daredevil. If they wanted an asian director for Hulk, they should have gotten John Woo over Ang Lee. C'mon, crouching tiger VS. Face-off, or hardboiled? Its a no brainer.) Paramount did hulk, and New Line is responsible for TMNT, and we will have to wait for that one. New Line specializes in horror though, so dont expect much. BTW, for those of you who use other peoples opinions to judge whether or not you will like a movie. I dont like you. You're sheep. Decide for yourself. You are the same people who cry out for freedom of choice and expression, but refuse to make your own decisions. No one likes you, jesus hates, go kill yourself.

Posted by: mike at March 13, 2007 10:18 PM

wow ... this place is pessimistic ... I'm going for a lil walk outside .. anyone I can heat up with a lil fire skull ... oh wait .. when someone touces my burning skull he doesn't get burned ... that's cool ... I'll just go real quick light my ass on fire ...

Posted by: eX at March 14, 2007 2:31 PM

I just saw this movie at a birthday get together. I suppose some of my friends have quite different tastes...

I think that the dialogue was the worst part. I was looking for the screen writer on the credits. I don't remember, but it was definitely horrible. I hated that they pulled out Faust in the middle for some Mephistopholes information. I just read some stuff by Goethe so I guess I was sensitive.

Posted by: Camille at March 18, 2007 9:16 PM

eva Mendez is not all that! she ain't even close to being all that. I am not even going to mention nick cage, b/c he is balding and soooo washed up. back to that greasy moron who can't act and i heard even count. SHE LOOKS LIKE A CUBAN GUY!!!!!! she has a moustache shadow and side burns for crying out loud!!!!! she is huge, she looks crazy tall, and she looks like a bucket of grease. wash ur hair eva!!! she is not pretty, I think she was a boy before she came to hollywood, and her name is really EVA MANDES!!!!!

Posted by: bklyn baby at May 24, 2007 4:41 PM

"Oh Wes Bentley, your sinister good looks have taken you to a dark place. Take time now and find solace in this otherwise disheartening truth-- because your star never truly rose, your fall from grace shall be a brief one".

your such a poetic bitch,vaduhnessa.wheres your shooting star.. oh I know, blogging. get a job.

Posted by: cookiemonster at June 8, 2007 1:48 PM

Those than can, do.

Those that can't, teach.

Those that can't do either - well they just write sad little comments on films that are meant to be harmless fun and not a commentry on the meaning of life.

Try writing, producing, directing, etc. It seems you all know how to make a great movie. Oops, looks like we're back to the "those that can't do either" comment again.

Get a life you miserable losers.

Posted by: Flaming Skull at July 29, 2007 10:15 AM





Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.