free counter with statistics Flicka | Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

flicka.jpg


She Sure as Hell Ain’t My Friend

Flicka / Dustin Rowles

Film Reviews | October 20, 2006 | Comments (49)


God, I don’t understand family films. I’m sure there must be an audience for them; they appear almost weekly and usually make scads of money. But that doesn’t make the appeal any less perplexing. Aside from the occasional Spielberg flick (which hardly counts), I sure as hell didn’t watch these films growing up as part of a family unit (Nate and Hayes, notwithstanding), and I sure as hell wouldn’t subject any of my children to them. You’ve gotta have a small amount of disdain for your offspring to put them through films about bonding with horses, talking animals, surfing penguins, and magic jeans. At least My Girl had a valuable lesson: Don’t fuck with bee’s nests. And I’ll even admit that last year’s Because of Winn-Dixie was wholesomely sweet and altogether harmless, a film so earnest and free of cynicism that even the most contemptuous hipsters couldn’t disparage its intentions.

But when you put yourself through four years of college, three years of law school, and then anoint yourself a film critic and convince a handful of people that you know what the hell you’re talking about, it’s easy to question those choices when you wind up watching a film like Flicka. And it’s not really that I didn’t like it because I’m not a 12-year-old princess with bows in my hair, or that I’m not a Lester Burnham kind of guy who’d love nothing more than to have sex with his daughter’s friends (the primary demographic for Flicka, I can only imagine). It’s that Flicka is a movie about a motherfucking horse. A horse, people. What preteen wants to sit for 90 minutes and watch an entire film that revolves around a wild mustang, and what kind of parent would want to suffer through it? Surely there aren’t any tweenage girls left who dream of growing up to be a rancher? Or want to break the will of a wild horse, saddle it, and relegate it to a lifetime of oats and the occasional rodeo? Hasn’t the American Humane Association filtered its way down into the middle-school ranks yet? It’s not that I’m an avid horse enthusiast, but any organization that might prevent a travesty like Flicka from being foisted into the theaters is an organization I’m willing to stand behind (and two horses did die tragically during filming).

Whatever. I’m sure there are fans of Mary O’Hara’s novel who are still alive, and/or father-daughters with weird, passive-aggressive controlling relationships that might find Flicka oddly relatable. And to anyone who wants to spend an afternoon watching panoramic Wyoming plains (here played by New Zealand) with horses running through them or Maria Bello and Alison Lohman frolicking through a meadow, Flicka is your film. But to any other families who might find it disturbing that a 27-year-old woman — who once appeared in a ménage a trois with Kevin Bacon in an NC-17 film — is playing an innocent 16-year-old rancher in a film about a horse, then I beckon you to sit down with your children and watch a more worthwhile film, say, 1996’s classic Hulk Hogan family film, Santa with Muscles.

Aside from being a film about a horse, Flicka is about Katy (Lohman), a 16-year-old who daydreams about horsies so much that she flunks out of her private school. But never mind that, she wants to be a rancher, anyhow. And when she returns home for the summer, she ventures out into the plains and finds a wild mustang (Flicka), who scares away a mountain lion. And what better way to win over the heart of a teenager?

So, Katy eventually manages to wrangle Flicka and bring it back to the ranch, where it just scares all the other horses away and hacks off her mustangophobic father, Rob (Tim McGraw), who refers to Flicka as “loco” enough to probably get him fired as a Fox baseball announcer. Rob is an angry man, having — apparently — tired of singing, “I Like It, I Love It,” every Monday for an entire football season. He’s pissed because his daughter flunked out, he’s pissed because of that goddamn horse (me too!), and he’s pissed (I assume) because there aren’t any stairwell sex scenes with Maria Bello, so he naturally takes it out on Katy. He’s totally a “my house, my rules,” kind of father and eventually gets so fed up with Flicka and Katy’s shenanigans that he sends the horse off to the rodeo.

Unfortunately, McGraw isn’t much of an actor. In fact, on a scale of country singers who cross over into acting — where Dwight Yoakum is at the top — McGraw falls somewhere around Ray Stevens’ appearance on “Hee Haw” (The one where he sang “Mississippi Squirrel Revival”). Anyway, Katy, clearly unhappy with the situation, rubs some charcoal on her face, dons a cowboy hat, and pulls a “Twelfth Night” in order to win her mustang back by riding Flicka in the wild horse competition, which leads to an unexpected result: Katy is thrown from the horse, Flicka stomps her to death, and Luke Perry runs in off the set of 8 Seconds and shoots the equine to save the day. Actually, that last part was just in my head, but it would’ve offered a far more entertaining ending than the one we’re given, which involves the reappearance of that mountain lion, a 105-degree fever, and Tim McGraw trying his damndest to convince us he’s weeping.

Written by the team that scripted Planet of the Apes and Mighty Joe Young (arguably, a film about apes may be as bad as one about a horse) and cobbled together by Michael Mayer to look like an extended Doublemint commercial without the sexual undertones, Flicka may not be the worst family film I’ve seen in a while, but the competition isn’t exactly fierce in a genre dominated by Tim Allen. And that’s why I’m looking so forward to The Santa Claus 3: The Escape Clause (14 days and counting!), because then I’ll finally get to see a family film that’ll rival Santa Claus and the Ice Cream Bunny as the worst of all time.

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. He lives in a blue house with his wife in a hippie colony/college town in upstate New York. You may email him, or leave a comment below.









Infamous | Flags of Our Fathers


Comments

So... with all the other flicks coming out this weekend (The Prestige, Coppola the Younger's Dunstfest, Private Ryan Part II, not to mention Infamous) you choose this one? One in which you probably had 90% of the review written before you saw the movie? One which maybe 2% of your audience will even pretend to want to see? I sincerely hope it's because you couldn't find a babysitter and this was the only movie you could take your offspring to.

Publisher's Note: Your sincere hopes are misplaced, Mike. Not having children, I only selected Flicka out of a deep-seated and narcissistic desire to inflict bodily harm upon myself. It's genetic. Can't be helped. All of the rest of the aforementioned reviews should be up this evening, however, quickly satisfying the other 98 percent of our audience who would prefer we only write "scathing reviews" about films we plan to like.

Posted by: Mike at October 20, 2006 4:34 PM

So... I'll agree with you that family films seem to carry their own brand of saccharine packaging (generally complete with bad acting, bad writing, etc.), but I think you're WAY off base in thinking there's no longer an audience for such a movie. Yes, it's a movie about a motherfucking horse, and there is not a single woman I know (myself included) who didn't go through a horse phase at some point during her preteen years. The fact that it's about a HORSE is the main draw! I mean, really, who DOESN'T want to watch a movie about a wild mustang? Cynics.

(In the spirit of guilty admission, my favorite movies as a child were The Black Stallion and The Black Stallion Returns. And the Rogue Stallion (New Zealand film). And Wild Hearts Can't Be Broken. And I like Sea Biscuit, too. Mmmm... horse movies...)

Posted by: pseudoliterati at October 20, 2006 4:43 PM

Psht... so fucking what, the Lohman is in it- with Maria Bello. The Gmoff is totally there, with his daughter's friends, of course.
The only way this movie could be better is if it was filmed in post-apocalyptic Detroit (or, just regular Houston), featured a steamy ménage trios between Lohman, Bello and Ellen Page, and was directed from beyond the grave by Sam Peckinpah, starring Steve McQueen.
In fact- fuck it, I'm now pitching "Robocop 4(?, what number is robo up to anyway?)" as a family flick featuring the eternally pubescent Lohman as Robocop's (McQueen) headstrong rancher daughter caught between the lecherous advances of Maria Bello (played by Ellen Page) and the love of her wild Mustang (played by Maria Bello). Directed by Sam Peckinpah in post-apacolyptic Houston, TX.
Fear me.

Posted by: Gmoff Tarkin at October 20, 2006 5:02 PM

"flicka" means "girl" in Swedish.

Posted by: beka at October 20, 2006 5:35 PM

It's that Flicka is a movie about a motherfucking horse. A horse, people.

Okay, I thought I was the only one who felt this way and I have children.

Posted by: Candy at October 20, 2006 5:36 PM

All I know, I that I really want to see Gmoff's movie... when is it due to hit the screens?

Posted by: Spike at October 20, 2006 5:42 PM

I can't believe I'm saying this, but I think you're being a little too cynical here. I wasn't born and raised on family movies, but I saw (and loved) Homeward Bound (I loved any movie with talking animals) when it came out, and it wasn't a painful experience for my mom to sit through it, either. Also, I was (and still am, on occasion) a sucker for the old animated Disney movies. Is it so wrong to have a crappy childhood film phase? What exactly do you expect children to be watching, anyway?

Author's Note (cause he's feeling chatty): It probably doesn't say a lot about my childhood, but my preteen years consisted of mostly John Hughes, Troma Films, and late-night HBO. Oh, and that Yahoo Serious movie totally rocked when I was 13. And Babe was a fine talking animal movie.

Posted by: Lisa at October 20, 2006 6:12 PM

Am I the only one here who immediately thought this is yet ANOTHER of those movies made from old TV shows. I'm talking about that 50's Saturday morning classic "My Friend Flicka". Of course, the hero was a young boy but what the hell.

And yes, it, too, was about a motherfucking HORSE!

Posted by: Uncle JR at October 20, 2006 6:27 PM

I never went through a horse phase. I can't stand horse movies.

Posted by: Liz at October 20, 2006 6:27 PM

Quite a few preteen girls love horses. I was conned into running around in circles during recess on an invisible 'lunge line', subjected to the cruelest of taunts, and became an honorary member of the Pony Pal Club when I was ten or eleven. My sister and a number of the people I fell in with at my new school adored horses. We often saddled up our upside-down laundry basket and posted for hours. Practice, apparently. My point: Lots of young girls are going to go through a horse phase. Half of them will take lessons, become good riders, and be respected. The others will just cry and try to distance themselves as much as possible from their humiliating, laundry-basket humping days.
That doesn't change that Flicka probably isn't very good, but it's definitely got an audience.

Posted by: Lola at October 20, 2006 6:30 PM

Lisa, I think the point is that childhood films don't HAVE to be crappy. Hollywood just prefers to rehash every other horsie movie that preceded this one because it's easier than actually trying to produce a quality feature with an original idea, and because well, that's what Hollywood does. As the review pointed out, the actual quality of family-oriented fare seems to have little to do with profitability, so why should they go to the effort of making something good if it doesn't affect the bottom line either way? I've seen positive reviews for kiddie flicks on this site (though aside from Cars, I couldn't tell you what they were, maybe they were just positive sentences).

And Dustin, sorry for the bitching above - I know you are a masochist and that someone had to draw the short straw so that Pajiba can adhere to its completist aspirations. I was just hoping to see a review of a movie I might actually consider seeing this weekend before I knock off of work, and I inappropriately directed my frustrations towards you.

As a final aside, maybe you should bribe maryscott to resume her duties as kiddie-flick critic. She could at least provide a parental perspective, though I suspect her review would not be substantively different in this case.

Author's Note: I take no offense, Mike. And I certainly hope you make/made it to see Prestige, which - as Dan makes clear - is pretty fantastic. And no one on staff likes the children/family films. They're not only terrible to watch, but hard as hell to review, mostly because it's difficult to come up with something even remotely interesting to say about them (Tim Allen sucks. Tim Allen blows. Tim Allen really sucks, etc. etc.). In fact, I once tried to talk Phillip into changing out the title of one film and putting it into a review of another. It's basically the same thing the studios do. And I'm not sure anyone would've noticed.

Posted by: Mike at October 20, 2006 6:46 PM

You know, I went through a horse phase. A BIG one! I rode horses, in fact (English riding, natch, none of that bounce-around-in-the-saddle bullshit for this cowgirl). Still love them, still like to ride. Horse movies though? Fuckin' hate 'em! There is no point really: since horses don't quite have the on-screen personality and expressiveness of dogs or apes, horse movies are really usually about people. Really dull people.

Ugh. I saw the previews for this and wanted to bash my head in on the coffee table. Thanks for validating my hate!

Posted by: Horsey at October 20, 2006 7:04 PM

what's so bad about horse movies? ever seen Seabiscuit? it was nominated for quite a few Oscars and the people in charge of it did that movie right.

although, as a horse lover myself, this movie (where the main character is supposed to be a BOY thank you very much) looks disappointing, like "Dreamer" (with Dakota Fanning) which didn't even try to stick to the true story it was based on. plus, Dakota Fanning was in it.

maybe we need more horse movies not based in the family genre? guess so.

Posted by: Eileen at October 20, 2006 7:11 PM

The fascination that teen and pre-teen girls have with horses is big business here in the US--and probably the UK as well. I seem to have missed it, but a lot of my friends went through a mandatory horse phase that involved nagging their parents for riding lessons, reading endless crap novels about horses that had plots that make the one in this movie look brilliant and buying incredibly expensive models of horses. My ex-wife's daughter was so into it that she took riding lessons for years and worked in a stable to help pay for the boarding of the horse her dad bought her.




My guess is that most dads won't see this film, unless they go expecting to see Maria Bello dressed like a cheerleader--which is pretty much the only reason I'd see it. It's a mother-daughter movie where daughter can squee over horses and Mom can sigh over Tim McGraw and mourn her past youth. I suspect it'll do well in multiplexes attached to malls.

Posted by: telesilla at October 20, 2006 8:47 PM

gmoff Tarkin, way to lay it out there brother.maria bello can flicka this!!!

Posted by: pasadenamike at October 20, 2006 9:21 PM

Okay guys. I'd just like to say that I am a 16 year old girl, and I would actually shoot myself in the foot before I saw this movie. I went through a horse phase when I was about 9, and even then I didn't bother with peices of shit like this. A bad movie is a bad movie no matter what it's about, and there are quite a few teenage girls who realize that. You can find us in the theater for Little Children.

Posted by: kiki at October 20, 2006 9:36 PM

I read (or heard) somewhere once that all girls go through a horse phase or a Virgin Mary phase.

Wanting desperately, and misguidedly, to be a priest, I never cared about horses, but had a shrine to the VM and prayed the rosary every night. My best friend reread the Black Stallion books every couple of months, though, and was creepily (...I thought, anyway--but then again I talked to s statue every night) in to her grandmother's stables.

Of course, once we hit the double digits, out go the stables and religious statues, in come the recreational drugs and vandalism. Oh, my tween years!

Posted by: Alie at October 20, 2006 10:58 PM

If people have to make movies about animals, why can't they use cool animals? Like camels. Remember that scene in "Lawrence of Arabia" where Omar Sharif says "Thirty days without water and the camels begin to die. If the camels die, we die"? The camel behind him emits this very eloquent "Aaargh!" Like he's saying, "Fuck this. I don't want to die. And who the hell are these people anyway?" Fucking genius.

Like I said. If animal movies absolutely have to be made, they should be about camels. I'd take my nonexistant kids to that.

Posted by: Padma at October 21, 2006 12:46 AM

I have friends (in college, no less!) who are obsessed with horses, and would probably go apeshit for this movie.

Posted by: Deniz at October 21, 2006 1:53 AM

Y'know, I forget who suggested it, but I believe it was at some point suggested that the reasons preteen girls obsessions over horses had something to do with budding sexuality.
I forget if this was ever proven, but the review of this assuredly awful film brought it to mind.

Posted by: the hel at October 21, 2006 2:55 AM

Gmoff -

Peckinpah's 1972 "Junior Bonner" has taken over your subconcscious.

Posted by: boarwild at October 21, 2006 4:13 AM

Padma,

Fucking Hilarious! I'd see a movie about camels;I did see a documentary about camels, "Wheeping Camels" (I can't underline, so pardon me) to be exact. It was a kick ass documentary. i don't know if that counts.

I'm going to re-watch "Lawrence of Arabia" (again, underline) just so I can watch that scene.

Posted by: carrie at October 21, 2006 4:26 AM

"Ménage trios"? Please tell me you just invented that term in an effort to add a little bit of flair to a horse movie review. Please tell me nobody is actually using that terrible pseudo-Spanish-sounding bastardization of a French phrase.

Author's Note: No, MJ. It was a simple typo - but, I'm kind of fond of pseudo-Spanish-sounding bastardizations of French phrases.

Posted by: MJ at October 21, 2006 8:15 AM

Dustin, I didn't know you were a lawyer! So am I. Probably the explanation for why I check this site daily - it's the only dose of humor/insight I get all day until I head home around, oh, 10:30 or so to see my husband. Humorless profession.

Anyway, I must say that I absolutely detested movies about animals of any kind when I was a kid. Old Yeller? Bored the shit out of me. That said, I absolutely loved, loved, LOVED The Black Stallion. Am I correct in thinking there was no dialogue in that movie for its first 45 minutes or so? Anyway, I think the difference is that that movie was about more than a motherfucking horse - it was about the child's attachment to the horse, it was about class, it was about a child coping with a horrific and frightening tragedy, and it was about tension within a family. Sounds like Flicka was just about the motherfucking horse.

Posted by: Samantha T at October 21, 2006 8:22 AM

Am I somehow to be villified because I was, yes, one of those preteens who rode horses, loved horses, and loved horse movies?

::sigh::

I did, at least, realize that they were bad movies, but I watched them anyway.

Bad, except, of course, for the excellent Black Stallion... and I'm glad other people realize how cool it really was.

Posted by: pseudoliterati at October 21, 2006 2:03 PM

Fair enough, Dustin. :) I can't really appreciate them, they hit a bit too close to home for me.

Posted by: MJ at October 21, 2006 3:30 PM

First of all, I'm a 20-year-old female. I've been around horses since I was 7, been riding since I was 12, and bought my own horse at 17, both breaking and training him (his name is Riff Raff, and yes, I did name him after the character in RHPS).
There's no way I'd go to see this in the theatres, though I'd probably check it out if it was playing on TV when nothing else is on. However, I (respectfully) disagree with basically the entire second paragraph. This movie has plenty of audience, especially with horse-crazy preteen/teen girls. Have you ever spent some time with someone who's horse-crazy? It's not a misnomer. We are pretty damn insane; after all, we willingly hop onto 1000-pound prey animals and go really fast, jump things, and attempt to hold on when said prey animal decides it doesn't want you up there anymore. I myself have been thrown into trees, fences, walls, and once into a jump that broke three bones in my face. I still do it, even if I do admit to being completely out of my mind. I even make a living working in a horse barn.
Having said all that, I do realize that this site is dedicated to being scathing. It's right in the title. I also realize that most horse movies, especially recent ones attempting to capitalize on the whole ooh-horsey thing, are going to suck my (imaginary) left nut. Doesn't mean they aren't going to make oodles of cash, and doesn't mean there isn't any audience for them.
P.S the hel: I can't speak for the male riders out there, but there are certain positions and movements that you do on horseback (especially in dressage, with all that fancy stuff) that can feel quite nice to a girl. Then again, misjudging a jump and smashing into the pommel hurts like a bitch. Just thought I'd share.

Posted by: Cuno at October 21, 2006 5:54 PM

What I can't understand is why and when the screenwriters chose to make the main character a girl? In the book it was a boy, and the conflict between the irresponsible boy and his father.

And the book doesn't pull any punches. If you haven't read it, you might think it would be all about braiding clover in Flicka's mane. But it's not --- and all the better for it.

I'll probably catch up with this on HBO someday --- it sure doesn't look to be near the league of THE BLACK STALLION or THE MAN FROM SNOWY RIVER imho.

Posted by: ErosLane at October 22, 2006 3:14 AM

Dustin, you snobby puss(y), you're a little girl who never got your own horse when you wanted it, so you're a little bitter, your review is about as tough as a grizzly bears clit and just as tasty, so lighten up and quit a taking your "critquein'" too seriously. You're a high brow mutherfuckin' pussie who can't/won't be creative, so I say put up or shut up beeeeeaaaahhhhtch.

Posted by: Frank at October 22, 2006 1:56 PM

there was only one girl i knew growing up who was into the horse/pony thing and everyone thought she was pretty weird.

dustin, i'm glad you have a biological need to inflict pain on yourself. it has enriched my life with comic relief on countless occasions. this review actually really makes me want to see tim mcgraw strain to cry.

Posted by: peace pipe at October 22, 2006 6:36 PM

Oh hell. When you wrote the bit at the end about the horse stomping the girl to death, I perked right up and thought - ho-lee-SHIT, I gotta see this flick(a)!! Damn it, it was all a dream. I don't think I could see this movie without taking half a bottle of Phenergan (a mildly sedating anti-nausea medication, for the pharmaceutically uninformed). And I am the most obsessed horse-freak on the face of this earth. Truly.

Posted by: Damned I Am at October 22, 2006 6:50 PM

I have no problem admitting that I loved horses as a girl, and still do in my late twenties (in fact, what woman doesn't love a stallion? ba-dum-dummmm). My Friend Flicka was a damned fine book, my friends, a damned fine book. That doesn't mean this movie doesn't suck, but for a lawyer Dustin, your argument lacked any solid logic. You just gave me a bunch of special pleading about "it's about a horse". SO WHAT? Movies don't suck because they are about animals. I'd rather watch a bunch of animals run around on screen than half of Hollywood...

Posted by: I like horsies at October 22, 2006 8:42 PM

Remember when Moe Syzlak (sp?) was reading 'My Friend Flicka' (can't underline) at the Helter Shelter? And then he cried that lone green tear? '...And truly, she was my friend Flicka.'

True Heart.

Posted by: M at October 23, 2006 1:16 AM

I would personally rather watch a film of horses grazing in a pasture for two hours than watch 90% of what Hollywood puts out.

What I take real offense to is them taking a great book, ripping its heart out, and making a movie out of the mangled remains.

Posted by: Shannon at October 23, 2006 8:48 AM

typo:

"It's not that I'm an avid horse enthusiast it, but any..."

(it, but)


Other than that, I think it's a fabulous review.

Author's Note: Noted and corrected. Cheers. I've apparently got a knack for littering my reviews with random pronouns.

Posted by: giraffe at October 23, 2006 2:11 PM

Someone forgot to dose Frank again.

Posted by: Craig at October 23, 2006 6:48 PM

And I thought it was just because I was a sucky reviewer.

: )

mwah

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at October 23, 2006 7:33 PM

Ok - so I actually saw this movie because I promised my 5 year old daughter I would take her to one and it was the only one playing that we had not yet seen that was appropriate for her age. (and this, Dustin, is one of the primary reasons why these crappy family do so well -- because there are few movies that you can take kids under 12 to nowadays).

The biggest problem was the cast. As you pointed out, Allison Lohman is only about 10 years younger than Maria Bello, who is supposed to be her mother. What casting director thought that just because she was small she could pull off playing a 16 year old? There was not one second in the movie when I believed she was 16. And Tim McGraw does rank up there as the most wooden actor of all time. And the son! I don't know any 18 year old boy who is that nice. Find me one and I'll trade my son with him AND throw in a hunk of cash.

With a better cast, one where I truly believed the passion that a 16 year old (but not a 27 year old) girl could have for a horse, it might have been an OK movie. But I kept looking at my watch and praying for the next Pixar flick to arrive soon and save me from this family crap...

Posted by: Suzy at October 23, 2006 8:30 PM

"an extended Doublemint commercial without the sexual undertones"


(and now for our moment of zen)

Posted by: Vi at October 24, 2006 4:20 AM

I have a confession:

Because my 8 year old's Nana would gladly sit in a pile of broken glass for two hours if it would add one iota to the child's happiness, on the rare occasions when we go to the megaplex I often send the two of them to see the family movie du jour and take myself to see the good stuff.

But even they won't be going to see this dreck.

That said, lack of good family fare was one of the main reasons we bit the bullet and treated ourselves to a really good home theater system. We rarely go out to the movies now. And while other kids are dragging their parents to the latest Tim Allen effort (effort?), mine will be propped in her movie spot by the merrily crackling woodstove with the dogs and her hot chocolate, enjoying something worthwhile. (Thank you Netflix!)

One of my proudest moments happened during an episode of "Zach and Cody" (we watch good movies, but bad TV) when all the characters piled one by one into the family coat closet. My 8 year old called me over and said, "Look Mommy... they're doing that scene from that Marx Brothers movie." She'd recognized an homage the Stateroom Scene from Night at the Opera.

Her favorite movie? "Some Like It Hot" - which is still somehow purer and more innocent than Alison Lohman pretending to be a teenager.

Posted by: mezzomom at October 24, 2006 10:31 AM

Oh, and Carrie, the kid and I really enjoyed "The Weeping Camel" too! Except that she really wants a yurt now. But not a camel, thank goodness!

Posted by: mezzomom at October 24, 2006 10:38 AM

"Her favorite movie? "Some Like It Hot" - which is still somehow purer and more innocent than Alison Lohman pretending to be a teenager."

Your little one's got good taste! That movie is hysterical.

Posted by: Samantha T at October 24, 2006 7:50 PM

My daughter really loves the horses, of course she's four and we live in Lexington, Ky, and my mom owns a farm with...horses. So there's some kind of innate prejudice, there. I had friends who were horse crazy when I was a kid, but I never got into it. I do remember seeing Black Beauty and crying my eyes out, though. However we will not be seeing Flicka, not because it's an awful film (I'll sit through anything horse-related if it makes my daughter happy--ok, I take that back, not Spirit) but because (as Dustin noted) two horses were killed in production. That about does it for me.

PS-You get bonus points for this review for being familiar enough with Ray Stevens to know the "Mississippi Squirrel Revival." Talk about childhood memories!

Posted by: Sally at October 25, 2006 10:38 AM

You are the most long winded writer I have ever read - not to mention self absorbed. You first line said it all. We know a family film could never be cool enough for you.

Posted by: Cgilreath at October 25, 2006 10:14 PM

Oh my god! pseudoliterati! I LOVED LOVED LOVED the Rogue Stallion, and I didn't know anyone else saw it. Totally forgot about that movie until just right now. Made my otherwise crappy day. Thanks.

Posted by: Abbey Road at October 26, 2006 3:51 PM

"And to anyone who wants to spend an afternoon watching panoramic Wyoming plains (here played by New Zealand)"

LOLZERZ

Posted by: ofthrees at October 27, 2006 7:45 PM

You're nuckin' futs! The movie was very enjoyable...though not probably for pseudo-intellectuals.

Posted by: KEVIN K at November 3, 2006 1:36 PM

I'm a 23 yo female and I have a weakness for movies aimed towards preteen girls, tweeners, whatever it is we call these days. Some flat out suck, i.e. Just my Luck and New York Minute, but I watched Aquamarine 3 times and I enjoyed it a lot more than I'd like to admit ::blushing:: so I'm thinking I'd like me some Flicka long time. Plus I have a passive aggressive father, and I was -- Ok, still am -- a wild child, so yeah I could relate to that and My Little Ponies rocked my socks off. So of course that would make me dimwitted or immature, but there is nothing wrong with grown men wiping the drool off their chin at Spidey or Batman come opening day/night? Double standards as always. Why are the juvenile male thrills socially acceptable, but females are expected to trash our Birtney CD's come a certain age. Fuck that! Hit me baby one more time- I'll never not want to sing that jumping on my bed and singing into my hairbrush. This makes oh so uncool; nothing I can't handle, but sometimes I think it'd be way more fun to be a dude. One could eat cold pizza for breakfast, getting crumbs in bed, wearing yesterday's clothes, and wouldn't get half of the flack. Gonna go put on my cherry glitter lip gloss yay! Hello Kitty- Don't ever leave me, don't let them win the culture war.

Posted by: heart of a child at November 7, 2006 5:13 PM

u need 2 post more apropiate stuff!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: hannah at March 28, 2007 1:13 PM



searchthesite.jpg