free counter with statistics Flash of Genius | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

genius1.jpg

Patent Law Enthusiasts, Now There’s a Movie for You Too!


Flash of Genius / Phillip Stephens

Film Reviews | October 6, 2008 | Comments (20)


Flash of Genius is one of those films that are almost impossible to critique, which ride a fine line between worthless and innocuous. As a piece of entertainment, it’s perfectly serviceable; nothing about the movie is actually bad at all, but nor is there anything to recommend. This is a standard yarn about David taking on Goliath and first-time director Marc Abraham never strays too far from the path, and yet what was probably an inspiring story in its original form makes a dull film in the rehashing.

This embellished tale is of engineering professor Robert Kearns (Greg Kinnear) who, in the late 1960s, invented the intermittent windshield wiper, one of those taken-for-granted, ubiquitous designs which should’ve made him millions. Kearns took his invention to Ford for licensing, hoping to manufacture the product himself. The higher-ups of the company all but slaver over Kearns’ ingenious device, but after absconding with it for “safety testing,” suddenly tell Kearns they aren’t interested. Kearns is stunned, but thinks chicanery is afoot when Ford’s new models (as well as the rest of the Big Three) are all outfitted with his intermittent wipers. Kearns is, understandably, incensed, but his attempts to gain recognition are met with discouragement by everyone involved, especially his long-suffering wife (Lauren Graham). Undeterred and becoming increasingly obsessive, Kearns suffers a nervous breakdown and is institutionalized.

This mental collapse is a bit of a leap in the logic of Flash of Genius’s narrative, and it’s here where Kearns’ character starts to show a bit of a troubling dichotomy: he appears as a bumbling goofball; strange, but basically endearing man who skirts madness more often than brilliance. Released from psychiatric care, Kearns is no less obsessed with getting Ford to fess up for the theft of his idea. He constantly wages patent litigation over the course of years, resulting in untold personal costs. The latter half of the film follows this unrelenting, uphill struggle as Kearns refuses to stop even when Ford throws piles of money at him. The film assumes a tacked-on homily of never sacrificing a moral truth in the face of insurmountable odds, but this gets a bit tangled in the realities of the script. Kearns’ fight against the wicked corpocracy is certainly a just one, but as obsessive as he is about securing recognition and oblivious to the suffering this fight is causing his loved ones (his wife eventually leaves him), Kearns becomes less of a hero than a parochial nutjob with right on his side.

Yet, even with a blurred protagonist, it’s hard to imagine who would get choked up about a film like Flash of Genius: motor vehicle historians? Patent attorneys? Other inventors? Maybe, but even they won’t be awed by the way this familiar story is told, nor by the victory we know David will wrest from Goliath in that triumphant final moment (if you considered that a spoiler…wow). Making things like this engaging is a difficult task, one that neither cast nor crew are quite up to. Flash of Genius is just competent; a host of OK individual parts whose sum is a blazing boatload of meh.

Phillip Stephens is the lead critic and book editor for Pajiba. He lives in Fayetteville, Arkansas and wastes his twenties in grad school(s).


AMC to Develop Red Mars | Sarah Palin Joe Biden Debate Ratings



Comments

Never been first...doesn't feel that different. Now to read the column

Posted by: Rubble44 at October 6, 2008 2:21 PM

I can identify with this. My family has also suffered the indignity of having a loved one's invention stolen by a giant corporation. Looking at that person descend into, madness.


My father invented the pulsating mechanism for double-headed dildos, he never saw a penny.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 6, 2008 2:28 PM

Great! Thanks for ruining the ending, Phillip. You know, I come to this site to read a review of the film, not have the entire movie spelled out in all its intricate details. God.

Posted by: Anna "Knife Pile" von Beaverplatz at October 6, 2008 2:31 PM

I come to this site to not have the entire movie spelled out in all its intricate details. God.

Posted by: Anna "Knife Pile" von Beaverplatz at October 6, 2008 2:31 PM
----------------------------------------------

You need to settle down madam. You are starting to sound CRAZY.

I said, SETTLE DOWN!

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 6, 2008 2:36 PM

What's the deal, Anna?
I knew this story from my college days.
We studied it in my Business Law class.
I thought everyone knew this story.
It's sort of like reading a review of Titanic and being pissed off because the reviewer tells you the ship sinks.

Posted by: BWeaves at October 6, 2008 2:42 PM

(if you considered that a spoiler...wow).

I was just playing off this. i have read almost absolutely nothing about his film, and I already knew this ending. I was imagining someone, somewhere not knowing and having this reaction.

I've just gotten so good at sarcasm, even I don't know half the time if I'm being sarcastic...

Posted by: Anna "Knife Pile" von Beaverplatz at October 6, 2008 2:46 PM

I like Kinnear, I like Graham, I like cars, and when it rains, I enjoy my intermittent windshield wipers.

I've got no interest in seeing this. What's the point? I'd rather eat soup.

Posted by: Skittimus Maximus at October 6, 2008 2:49 PM

I already have a great idea for the sequel. They did the same thing to the guy who invented the coolant recovery system, the little reservoir that sits by the radiator and has a hose and two valves so that when the radiator boils over it goes into it and when the radiator cools and forms a vacuum the second valve opens up and sucks it all back into the system. Part of that guy's settlement, besides millions of dollars, was being named as the inventor and patent holder in every car manual for years after he won the suit. It's just thrilling even to think about let alone see it on the silver screen.

Posted by: OscarTamerz at October 6, 2008 3:01 PM

I just invented the 'Fuck-U-Drive'. It's an inflatable nun that fellates you at stop signs, as long as they're not crossroads, which would be sacrilegious. When GM steals the patent from me, I'd like you to know I have every Godless Pajiba-ite down for monkey points on the movie deal, because, like, it will be in every car ten years from now.

Posted by: Zuffle at October 6, 2008 3:18 PM

The movie will be shit, by the way.

Posted by: Zuffle at October 6, 2008 3:19 PM

Anna.....Rosebud......it's a sled.

Coming up next: Who was Keyser Soze????

As for Lauren Graham, I would like to intermittently motorboat her at a medium speed.

Posted by: Rubble44@socal.rr.com at October 6, 2008 3:26 PM

This actually sounds really interesting. Not the movie, per se, but I'm going to try to find stuff written about this guy. And the coolant recovery system guy. Oh my gosh, I'm such a nerd.

Posted by: Sabrina at October 6, 2008 4:24 PM

I'm with you Sabrina...I just stopped reading the review to read the guys wikipedia page. I guess that makes me a nerd, as well.

Posted by: jamiepants at October 6, 2008 4:41 PM

I've got nothing to say about the movie, I just wanted to send out a HUGE THANKS to BSlims dad.

Posted by: Phat girl at October 6, 2008 5:20 PM

i've retired from lurking to make off topic comments about other movies with the same leads.

I loved Autofocus. as in lubbed it loved it. it was like looking at a really creepy version of my own alternate dimension future. And it endeared me to Greg Kinnear forever.

but i wont be watching this. thank you for your time

Posted by: VinKong at October 6, 2008 6:29 PM

The idea of patent law is so interesting...yet the one time I was staffed to a patent case I seriously wanted to die because it was so tedious.

I don't know - I think this movie sounds great.

Posted by: samantha t at October 7, 2008 6:50 AM

I saw a trailer for this a few weeks ago and looked the guy up on Wikipedia, in a *flash* of fleeting interest. Even the Wiki entry is pretty meh. I don't drive, however, so perhaps I just can't feel the deep throb of windshield-wiper-appreciation that others might.

Posted by: b at October 7, 2008 8:34 AM

It's an inflatable nun that fellates you at stop signs, as long as they're not crossroads, which would be sacrilegious.

that's funny shit right there.

Posted by: Stella at October 7, 2008 4:08 PM

I think the voice over in the tv ad really cinched it for me. "You'll never look at windshield wipers the same way again!"

Um, yeah. Pass.

Posted by: Gudrun at October 7, 2008 4:41 PM

Having worked for a patent office, I can tell you that most Patent Lawyers would be horrified at the prospect of this movie in their real lives. Sure, it's great entertainment and myth, but most patent lawyers have no interest in defending the rights of the small inventor - they're there to defend the infringers and get a cut of the sweet, sweet profits being made.

Of course, I'm dying to see someone clever enough to make a film featuring patent squatters. There's one in Iowa who was an ENT doc who has spent thousands in Don Quixote missions while committing Medicare fraud.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at October 8, 2008 11:42 AM