free counter with statistics Flags of Our Fathers | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

flags1.jpg
The Ashes of American Flags

Flags of Our Fathers / Phillip Stephens

Film Reviews | October 20, 2006 | Comments (12)


It was the image that said it all: Every sweetly pent-up emotion concerning American patriotism, war, and national identity could be expressed by the famous photograph of six soldiers hoisting up a flag on Mount Suribachi, Iwo Jima. The picture became the icon for the war, if not the entire American military, and helped inspire that final drive to victory. With Flags of Our Fathers, Clint Eastwood wants us to know that such images, though necessary, are probably missing the point.

Eastwood’s war biopic pays homage to the World War II veterans who endured the chaotic hell of the Pacific Theater and went on to become symbols of American heroism, three of whom: Ira Hayes (Adam Beach), “Doc” Bradley (Ryan Philippe), and Rene Gagnon (Jesse Bradford) went on to tour the States as celebrities. The story is based on the book by Ron Powers and James Bradley, the son of “Doc,” around whom the story somewhat listlessly revolves, jumping back and forth between the soldiers involved with the photograph and the unease with which the survivors deal with their newfound legendary status.

From the beginning of the soldiers’ portrait stateside and their flashbacks to the battle, Eastwood wants to show us that the truth behind the legend was more complicated and dark than popular imagination tends to credit. The flag raised in the picture was actually the second placed on Suribachi, and later it became apparent that one soldier was misidentified in the haste to venerate the participants. In addition, the three survivors from the picture react in remarkably different ways to their icon status: Gagnon revels in it, seeing his opportunity to become the hero that he was not; Bradley endures it, if uncomfortably; and Hayes despises the whole affair, becoming more and more tortured by the thought of being idolized. Regardless of these responses, it becomes obvious that the real force behind the picture was its manipulation by politicians and businessmen who saw it as a means to success instead of one born in harrowing tragedy.

It’s especially ironic, then, that Eastwood’s meditation on war becomes too mired in ideals to really allow a close connection to the human element it espouses. Of all the characters presented, only Hayes seems to evoke the core of tragedy involved. Hayes was an American Indian, constantly patronized for his heritage, and was plagued with guilt for being returned from the war for what he correctly saw as a farcical publicity campaign. Hayes descends into alcoholism and, after war’s end, a destitution that is truly saddening given the excellent performance by Beach. The rest of the characters are pushed to arm’s length, even Bradley, about whom the story revolves, as well as several noted ensemble players including Paul Walker, Robert Patrick, Jamie Bell, Barry Pepper, and Neal McDonough.

Eastwood’s filmmaking is consistent and technically admirable; he achieves in his combat sequences an understated realism that is remarkable to watch on the island’s foreboding, black landscape (filmed in Iceland). It’s true that combat in every WWII movie (if not every war movie) will exist to some degree in Saving Private Ryan’s shadow, but Eastwood finds a good middle-ground here between the dynamic brutality of that film and one just underwhelming enough not to feel melodramatic. Eastwood is a much more cautious filmmaker than Spielberg, and he’s able to bring a quietly disturbing element to war where Spielberg was chiefly sensuous.

But in spite of this impeccable presentation, the film is lacking an emotional presence that would really inspire awe and understanding. Eastwood’s narrative is much too grandiose to encompass everything he presents in a meaningful way. Though his heart and head are in the right place, it’s hard to really connect with a film in which the empathy is divided among so many: The soldiers who fought and died, the politicians who used them, the families who found hope and encouragement in them, and the nation that mythologized them, all united by a powerfully ambivalent symbol that, as Eastwood has it, polishes over the truth of the real heroes. Flags of Our Fathers does exactly that to its own characters, making it an easy film to admire, but a difficult one to love.

Phillip Stephens is the lead critic for Pajiba. He lives in Fayetteville, AR.


Flicka | Marie Antoinette



Comments

The only thing I can think about now is that Johnny Cash song about "drunken Ira Hayes". Catchy as hell, but such a downer. MIght go listen to it instead of watching this.

Posted by: Anne at October 20, 2006 7:44 PM

I'm glad Adam Beach did so well in this movie. He's such an underrated actor. I'm hoping this exposure will generate roles not "Indian," but just about men. It's so typical of Hollywood to only cast Native-Americans/Canadians in roles that are within their ethnicity. And I'll end my diatribe, get one with what I'm saying.

I'm gonna see this in 4 days. Easwood's been consistent so far, aside from that dismal Absolute Power crap, he's been pretty good.
Plus, Pepper and Beach are in this movie and both are excellent actors.

Posted by: carrie at October 21, 2006 4:06 AM

Thursday - War all the Time.
I finally got a headline quote.

Movie looks great, but Eastwood also directed Blood Work and that movie was terrible (worse then Absolute Power) so we'll see.

Posted by: Rob at October 21, 2006 11:35 AM

Saw this last night, good movie. Adam Beach will receive an Oscar nomination, if not the award itself. Barry Pepper did an excellent job, too. I noticed some veiled criticism of the current administration and the Iraq war, particulary in the opening narration.

Posted by: Dan at October 21, 2006 1:00 PM

Its a Wilco song, not Thursday you twat.

Posted by: Keelan at October 21, 2006 9:48 PM

I was hoping this movie would be good, because I read this book in high school and it was so good. The book is definitely emotional and focuses more on how the war really bruised everyone's spirits and psyches. This film adaptation doesn't look like it'll really do that though...

Posted by: Dani at October 21, 2006 11:31 PM

Props for the Wilco song in the title.
I am still undecided on this movie, It'll probably end up being a rental.

Posted by: Matt R at October 22, 2006 3:59 AM

Keelan, it's also Thursday shithead.

Posted by: Rob at October 22, 2006 3:00 PM

Saw the movie last night. Totally visual experience in that I constantly recognized scenes drawn directly from movies or stills taken of the action at the time. Eastwood and the CG guys obviously had historic photos in their hands as they directed or produced scenes, not just of the flag raising.

The story telling seemed schizophrenic and you couldn't get involved in any part of the story long enough to gin up some emotion for the characters, except Ira Hayes. The story had flashbacks, flashforwards, flashsideways and was confusing. The movie editor should be run out of town. Why can't stories just be told from the beginning to the end like they used to do in the old days??

Posted by: Frank at October 23, 2006 9:29 AM

Good review - spot on. I was probably expecting too much and left the theater dissapointed.

Posted by: Craig at October 23, 2006 10:32 AM

I too was dissapointed. Eastwood film is beautifully shot, and edited with a wonderful score. Adam Beache's "Ira" was really moving. Outside of that, the story lacked personalization. Like the reviewer wrote, it just tried telling too many stories. It was hard for me to really invest in any characters beside "Ira Hayes." And even that wasn't enough.
Yawnnnnn.

Posted by: jeremy at October 23, 2006 12:59 PM

I find it strange that after shunning MDB for so long because I thought the hype was just that...(Come on...Paul Haggis!! ugh...I'm ashamed the man is also Canadian.) it wasn't too bad...and I think that had a lot to do with Clint Eastwood's direction...in the hands of a lesser man it would have been godawful...it would have been Crash! Anyway...I'm actually looking forward to seeing this one...not just for Clint but because I'm a long time fan of Adam Beach. He's been consistantly great in everything I can remember seeing him in from "Dance Me Outside" to a bit part in "Four Brothers" and I think it's about time he got recognized for it. Of course in the end I know that Forest Whitaker will win for his portayal of Idi Amin in Last King of Scotland...but the nomination will be enough. (BTW...run don't walk to see Last King of Scotland...it was possibly one of the best movies and best performances I've ever seen.)

Posted by: Ms. Parker at October 24, 2006 9:40 PM